Translation 3076

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Translation 3076 FISHERIES AND MARINE SERVICE Translation Series No. 3076 Some new terms in seston research by Einar. Naumann. Original title: Ueber einige neue Begriffe der Sestonkunde. Lunds Universitets Arsskrift From: Acta Universitatis Lundensis 20(3) . 3-]5, 1924 Translated by the Translation Bureau(HC'C:) Multilingual Services Division Departmènt of the Secretary of.State of Canada Department of the Environment Fisheriès and Marine Service Canada Centre for Inland Waters Burlington, Ont. 1974 20 pages typescript D.EPARTMENT OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE eM11 SECRÉTARIAT D'ÉTAT TRANSLATION BUREAU BUREAU DES TRADUCTIONS „<suiyil-A MULTILINGUAL SERVICES dge.Zat DIVISION DES SERVICES DIVISION CANADA MULTILINGUES Fe-A4 30 7 • CLIENT'S NO. ' DEPARTMENT DIVISION/BRANCH CITY N 0 DU CLIEnr MINISTRE DIVISION/DIRECTION VILLE 534609 Ezwironment Inland Waters Branch Burlington BUREAU NO. LANGUAGE TRANSLATOR (INITIALS) NO DU BUREAU LANGUE • • TRADUCTEUR (INITIALES) . 4 - ' • • .German . • 1. - (. ./ ' 1 . HGC . .1!Yi ... SOME NEW TERMS IN SESTON RESEARCH •• By Einar Naumann (Ueber einige neue Begriffe der Sestonkunde. Lunds Universitets Arsskrift. N.F. Avd. 2 Bd 20. Nr. 3. Acta Universitatis Lundensis. 1924.) . • e?* The term** esSestonn was introduced into limnology by R. • Kolkwit z (1912). Under- s est on - we- understand-. the- t otality- of bodies contained in water, whether in suSpension or floating in its surface • fi2m. • . • • Thus seston embraces several formation classes of animals and plants. In addition, it includes every kind of inanimate matter contained in free water -- detritus or tripton 1916). • The following . formation classes comprise seston: plankton (Hensen,.1887)„ nekton (Haeckel, 1891), pleuston (Schrdter and Kirchner, 1896), and neuston (Naumann, 1917). • * Figures in the margin give page nuMbers in the original. —1. TRANSL. ** IlBegriffil may mean both nterm” and ?concept." Both words are used in .. this translation, according to apparent context. • -- TRANSL. • UNEDITM TRANSLAT;ON For Informeion only • • TRADUC..TION NON REVISEE Aon—zoo. 0-31 • Informan soulemon• , As regards a more deta iled definition of these terms, we shall .confine ourselves to the following remarks. 1. In accordance with Kolkwitz (1912), plankton is defined as the organism formation of free mater. The initial term, as defined by Hensen, was extremely broad and could even be compared to the current term seston. Modern researchers e however, view plankton as a component part] of seston... 2. Nekton s according to Haeckel (1891) embracesienerally the larger water fauna that is relatively unaffected by external influences, divide nekton into planktonekton and neustonekton. The latter includes above all the insects of the mater surface studied by Brocher. 3. In accordance with SchrUter and Kirchner (1896), pleuston means the higher floating flora of the water. 4. Neuston. Organisms belonging thereto, in accordance with E. Naumann (1917), are defined as micro—organic formations found in the surface film of the water. Neuston, of course, also embraces all in- animate bodies found 'suspended in the surface film. The introduction of these definitions of the main term seston and its component terms has been very useful for the further treatment of limnological problems. This is especially true of certain branches of applied limnology. A further study of these matters, however, will probably lead to the need for a more detailed definition of the above noted mainl •• terms. This paper May be seen as a contribution in that direction. H • . 'I. ! . i . I. SIZE CLASSES OF SESTON Initially, seston may simply be divided into the Size classes of . .megâ10—, macro—, meso—, micro— and nannotypes. These are terms which have found wide application in plankton research for some time, through the witingn SchUtt (1892) and Lehmann (1911). The lable that follows Provides. information as to the current size relationships and technical characteristics denoted by these terms. 1 %.. To these terms 1 should now like toadd \the new term ultra- seston„ which is also included in the Table. By it 1 understand that part of the seston ranging in size from a fee microns to microscopie it is characterized by the fact that with invisibility. Technically the present state of technology it cannot be quantified completely. The term ultraseston is..based pr. imarilyi on technical considerations. Its purpose is, first of all, to indicate that this size class is outside . the research possibilities of modern investigational techniques, whose Units are defined by the bacteria and the finer detritus. Partly, however, ultraseston is also composed of bodies that are genuinely ultramicroscopic, i.e.: that are situated on or beyond the borderline of direct microscopic Observation. 1 This is easily demonstrated with dark—field illumination of water samples from waters with abundant seston. however, knowle%e on the ultramicroscopic conditions of natural bodies of water is still incomplete. .1 Ultraseston is composed of a highly heterogeneous material. The following elements predominate: • .(Text cont. on page 5) gze class Characteristics Technical Data Megaloseston Minimum size several centimeters Maybe caught with coarse nets and , Eacroseston and other filters • • Mesoseston Minimum size apprOx. 500-1,000 May be caught with coarse nets and nierons. (Tissue-building animDls et.) other filters Microseston Minimum size apprôx. 60 microns • May be caught r1..th finer nets and (The larger Protista; detritus flakes, other filters etc.) Nannoseston Minimum size approx, 5 microns Cannot be,calight with nets. Complete (Smaller Protista; finer detritus, etc.) quantitative determination possible 'only with centrifuge methods or with. chadber. • Ultraseston Size ranging from 5 microns at most to At besé, qualitatively determinable :microscopic invisibility. (Bacteria; with centrifuge or. chamheï-=---quantitatively the finest detritus, .etc.) . not fully determinable. .,,.,..v..^ • Aquatic bacteria • Peritripton resulting from the call.aborAtion of limnic organisms Colloidal f7.occula,tes of assimilates that Autochthonous I have entered the water elements Other colloidal flocculates Colloidal solutions a Allochthonous ^ Bacteria, peritripton and colloidal flocculates elements introduced from the outside None of these elements can be deter-mined quantitative77 i-r3,th present limnological methodology. We have as yet very few details con- cerning their h ature. This is especially true of bacteria. Although bacteriology of water has become tremendously important in' practical tezms, in theoretical terms it carries little weight. This is a disadvan- tage,'tahich results from the fact that bacteriolog<y is confined largely- -to the method of obtaining its material by concentration. ' Given Ithe present state of li.mnologg, we are.almost cer"in7y justified in characterizing ultraseston as one of.the most important factors in the total metabolism of freshwater bodies. 1 This element lof the total seston is the Unk in the total budget that represents the transition between dissolved nutrients and I the higher production of the water. It is here that the bacterial processing of expired vorganisms takes place, and it is also here that we find the source of colloidal flocculates. From this point, two paths diverge; one leads-vialthe further separation of organic substances ,1 into the realm of solutions; the other leads directly to a reincarnation in the 13.fe of the xoop:Lankton. In pure:y schematic terms, the position of ultraseston in the total spectrum of aquatic life may be represented appro^dm.ate],y as fol.l.o^rs. Y.^^►ldnuki^^s► (4,1641%. \i{Ihrnlnf(p Dïssolved ..nutrients 6 In advancing this scheme,.1 base myself primarily on the . resurks of ;vLy- investigations of the nutritive biology of ara_.?ma1 limno- plankton, on which I have reported in greater detail in several special publipations (1910, 1421,' y92.31). As described thereiln,, the productive biol4gy of the entire zooplankton of the filtrating and sedimentatinR .type. is dependent primarily on the nanno- and ûltraseston.in the water. This is true above all for the non-predatory Cladocera, where ultrasest^on is of the greatest importance, as wexl as for Diaptomidsa and, thirdly,- for the Rotifera. The important ro1,e thus being played by ultraseston in the total metabolism of freshwater makes more detailed investigationsof this subject highly desirable. Thus far, study of ultraseston has been confined to hygieniç bacteriology. Theoretical ^ interest must now focus I on biological bacteriology and tr3.pton research in the area of ultraseston. • • . II DETAILED GROUPING OF NEUSTON The . term neuston was introduced by me for the firet time in 1917. I used it to refer to the organism formation of the surface fila of water, in distinction to plankton, which defines the organisms of free water. The term has found wide acceptance. The further differentiation of the old plankton concept resulting therefrom should contribute to a continued development of various concepts and terms in the field of theoretical and applied limnology. A grouping of this formation class within the systematics of plant sociology,which I believe is not quite. correct, has been undertaken • y Gams (1918). He compares neuston with pleuston e and even classifies thu former as a subseries of the actual pleuston e which he terms micropleuston. This, hogever, is misleading. Pleuston is e after all, a Tr/holly different - formation ) since e according to the original definition
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report for the College of Marine Science Dean Jacqueline E. Dixon
    ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE COLLEGE OF MARINE SCIENCE DEAN JACQUELINE E. DIXON JANUARY 1 – DECEMBER 31, 2015 Locally Applied, Regionally Relevant, Globally Significant! TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents The View from the Bridge ____________________________________________________________ 2 College of Marine Science Snapshot_______________________ __________________________________3 College of Marine Science Leadership Team_______________________________________________4 Events and Highlights _______________________________________________________________ 7 Highlighted Research ______________________________________________________________ 10 Research Overview ________________________________________________________________ 15 Faculty Highlights _________________________________________________________________ 19 Facilities ________________________________________________________________________ 28 Graduate Education and Awards _____________________________________________________ 29 Education and Outreach ____________________________________________________________ 34 Development_____________________________________________________________________ 37 Publications ______________________________________________________________________ 39 Active Research Awards ____________________________________________________________ 49 Page | 1 THE VIEW FROM THE BRIDGE The View from the Bridge Florida is an ocean state. In Florida, coastal tourism contributes over 200,000 jobs and $50 billion annually. Seafood sales contribute more than $30 billion annually. The
    [Show full text]
  • Meiobenthos of the Discovery Bay Lagoon, Jamaica, with an Emphasis on Nematodes
    Meiobenthos of the discovery Bay Lagoon, Jamaica, with an emphasis on nematodes. Edwards, Cassian The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author For additional information about this publication click this link. https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/522 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] UNIVERSITY OF LONDON SCHOOL OF BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL SCIENCES Meiobenthos of The Discovery Bay Lagoon, Jamaica, with an emphasis on nematodes. Cassian Edwards A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2009 1 ABSTRACT Sediment granulometry, microphytobenthos and meiobenthos were investigated at five habitats (white and grey sands, backreef border, shallow and deep thalassinid ghost shrimp mounds) within the western lagoon at Discovery Bay, Jamaica. Habitats were ordinated into discrete stations based on sediment granulometry. Microphytobenthic chlorophyll-a ranged between 9.5- and 151.7 mg m -2 and was consistently highest at the grey sand habitat over three sampling occasions, but did not differ between the remaining habitats. It is suggested that the high microphytobenthic biomass in grey sands was related to upwelling of nutrient rich water from the nearby main bay, and the release and excretion of nutrients from sediments and burrowing heart urchins, respectively. Meiofauna abundance ranged from 284- to 5344 individuals 10 cm -2 and showed spatial differences depending on taxon.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep-Sea Life Issue 8, November 2016 Cruise News Going Deep: Deepwater Exploration of the Marianas by the Okeanos Explorer
    Deep-Sea Life Issue 8, November 2016 Welcome to the eighth edition of Deep-Sea Life: an informal publication about current affairs in the world of deep-sea biology. Once again we have a wealth of contributions from our fellow colleagues to enjoy concerning their current projects, news, meetings, cruises, new publications and so on. The cruise news section is particularly well-endowed this issue which is wonderful to see, with voyages of exploration from four of our five oceans from the Arctic, spanning north east, west, mid and south Atlantic, the north-west Pacific, and the Indian Ocean. Just imagine when all those data are in OBIS via the new deep-sea node…! (see page 24 for more information on this). The photo of the issue makes me smile. Angelika Brandt from the University of Hamburg, has been at sea once more with her happy-looking team! And no wonder they look so pleased with themselves; they have collected a wonderful array of life from one of the very deepest areas of our ocean in order to figure out more about the distribution of these abyssal organisms, and the factors that may limit their distribution within this region. Read more about the mission and their goals on page 5. I always appreciate feedback regarding any aspect of the publication, so that it may be improved as we go forward. Please circulate to your colleagues and students who may have an interest in life in the deep, and have them contact me if they wish to be placed on the mailing list for this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Oceanography - Legendre, Louis and Rassoulzadegan, Fereidoun
    OCEANOGRAPHY – Vol.II - Biological Oceanography - Legendre, Louis and Rassoulzadegan, Fereidoun BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY Legendre, Louis and Rassoulzadegan, Fereidoun Laboratoire d'Océanographie de Villefranche, France. Keywords: Algae, allochthonous nutrient, aphotic zone, autochthonous nutrient, Auxotrophs, bacteria, bacterioplankton, benthos, carbon dioxide, carnivory, chelator, chemoautotrophs, ciliates, coastal eutrophication, coccolithophores, convection, crustaceans, cyanobacteria, detritus, diatoms, dinoflagellates, disphotic zone, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved organic matter (DOM), ecosystem, eukaryotes, euphotic zone, eutrophic, excretion, exoenzymes, exudation, fecal pellet, femtoplankton, fish, fish lavae, flagellates, food web, foraminifers, fungi, harmful algal blooms (HABs), herbivorous food web, herbivory, heterotrophs, holoplankton, ichthyoplankton, irradiance, labile, large planktonic microphages, lysis, macroplankton, marine snow, megaplankton, meroplankton, mesoplankton, metazoan, metazooplankton, microbial food web, microbial loop, microheterotrophs, microplankton, mixotrophs, mollusks, multivorous food web, mutualism, mycoplankton, nanoplankton, nekton, net community production (NCP), neuston, new production, nutrient limitation, nutrient (macro-, micro-, inorganic, organic), oligotrophic, omnivory, osmotrophs, particulate organic carbon (POC), particulate organic matter (POM), pelagic, phagocytosis, phagotrophs, photoautotorphs, photosynthesis, phytoplankton, phytoplankton bloom, picoplankton, plankton,
    [Show full text]
  • Meiofaunal Responses to Sedimentation from an Alaskan Spring Bloom
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 57: 137-145, 1989 Published October 5 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. I Meiofaunal responses to sedimentation from an Alaskan spring bloom. I. Major taxa John W. ~leeger',Thomas C. shirley2,David A. ziemann3 'Department of Zoology and Physiology. Louisiana State University. Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803. USA 'Juneau Center for Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Juneau, Alaska 99801. USA 30ceanic Institute. Makapuu Point. PO Box 25280. Honolulu, Hawaii 96825, USA ABSTRACT: Metazoan meiofaunal comnlunity dynamics and spring phytoplankton bloom sedimenta- tion rates were measured concurrently in Auke Bay, Alaska. from 1985 to 1988. We test the null hypothesis that recruitment and density maxima are unrelated to sedimentation events. Springtime chlorophyll a sedimentation was predictable and episodic, occurring annually at peak rates during mid- May at 35 m; carbon sed~mentationwas continuous through the spring. Cumulative sedimentation varied from year to year, ranging from lowest to highest by a factor of 2. At a 30 m station, seasonal variation in major taxon density was not identifiable, however interannual variations in meiofaunal densities &d occur No consistent relationship between meiofaunal abundances and spring chl a or carbon sedimentation was found, i.e. years with the highest or lowest nematode and harpacticoid abundances did not correspond to years with the highest or lowest values for sedimentation. Other factors must regulate the interannual variation in meiofauna, at least over the range of values for sedimentation in Auke Bay. INTRODUCTION tions may settle quickly to the bottom (Billett et al. 1983, Townsend & Canlmen 1988), and settled cells Although there have been many recent ecological may be in good physiological and nutritional condition studies of the meiobenthos (Coull & Bell 1979), most (Lenz 1977).
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance of Gelatinous Carnivores in the Nekton Community of the Antarctic Polar Frontal Zone in Summer 1994
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 141: 139-147, 1996 Published October 3 ' Mar Ecol Prog Ser I Abundance of gelatinous carnivores in the nekton community of the Antarctic Polar Frontal Zone in summer 1994 'Alfred-Wegener-Institut fiir Polar- und Meeresforschung. ColumbusstraBe, D-27568 Bremerhaven, Germany 'British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road. Cambridge CB3 OET, United Kingdom ABSTRACT The species composition, abundance, vertical distribution, biovolume and carbon content of gelatinous nekton in the Antarctic Polar Frontal Zone are described from a series of RMT25 hauls collected from a series of 200 m depth layers between 0 and 1000 m. In total. 13 species of medusa, 6 species of siphonophore, 3 species of ctenophore and 1 species of salp and nemertean were ~dentified. On average gelatinous organisms contributed 69 3% to the biovolume and 30.3% to the carbon content of the samples, although the ranges were high (0 to 98.9":) and 0 to 62 G"/;,respectively). The most important contributor to the biovolume and carbon content was the scyphomedusan Pel-iphylla peri- phylla. Some specific assoc~ationsand restricted vertlcal d~stl-ibut~ons\vcrc related to trophic interac- tions among ostracods, amphipods and cnidarians. Observations made near South Georgla showed that medusae ancl ctenophores were preyed upon by albatrosses and notothen~oidflsh respectively. The results support the premise that gelatinous organisms are a major and, at tlmes, are the main compo- nent of the oceanic macroplankton/nekton community 111 the Southern Ocean KEY WORDS: Gelatinous nekton Southern Ocean Wet biomass Carbon content. Assemblages INTRODUCTION suspension feeding pelagic tunicates (salps), become dominant (Huntley et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Censusing Non-Fish Nekton
    WORKSHOP SYNOPSIS Censusing Non-Fish Nekton Carohln Levi, Gregory Stone and Jerry R. Schubel New England Aquarium ° Boston, Massachusetts USA his is a brief summary of a "Non-Fish SUMMARIES OF WORKING GROUPS Nekton" workshop held on 10-11 December 1997 at the New England Aquarium. The overall goals Cephalopods were: (1) to assess the feasibility of conducting a census New higher-level taxa are yet to be discovered, of life in the sea, (2) to identify the strategies and especially among coleoid cephalopods, which are components of such a census, (3) to assess whether a undergoing rapid evolutionary radiation. There are periodic census would generate scientifically worth- great gaps in natural history and ecosystem function- while results, and (4) to determine the level of interest ing, with even major commercial species largely of the scientific community in participating in the unknown. This is particularly, complex, since these design and conduct of a census of life in the sea. short-lived, rapidly growing animals move up through This workshop focused on "non-fish nekton," which trophic levels in a single season. were defined to include: marine mammals, marine reptiles, cephalopods and "other invertebrates." During . Early consolidation of existing cephalopod data is the course of the workshop, it was suggested that a needed, including the vast literatures in Japanese more appropriate phase for "other invertebrates" is and Russian. Access to and evaluation of historical invertebrate micronekton. Throughout the report we survey, catch, biological and video image data sets have used the latter terminology. and collections is needed. An Internet-based reposi- Birds were omitted only because of lack of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystems Mario V
    Ecosystems Mario V. Balzan, Abed El Rahman Hassoun, Najet Aroua, Virginie Baldy, Magda Bou Dagher, Cristina Branquinho, Jean-Claude Dutay, Monia El Bour, Frédéric Médail, Meryem Mojtahid, et al. To cite this version: Mario V. Balzan, Abed El Rahman Hassoun, Najet Aroua, Virginie Baldy, Magda Bou Dagher, et al.. Ecosystems. Cramer W, Guiot J, Marini K. Climate and Environmental Change in the Mediterranean Basin -Current Situation and Risks for the Future, Union for the Mediterranean, Plan Bleu, UNEP/MAP, Marseille, France, pp.323-468, 2021, ISBN: 978-2-9577416-0-1. hal-03210122 HAL Id: hal-03210122 https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03210122 Submitted on 28 Apr 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Climate and Environmental Change in the Mediterranean Basin – Current Situation and Risks for the Future First Mediterranean Assessment Report (MAR1) Chapter 4 Ecosystems Coordinating Lead Authors: Mario V. Balzan (Malta), Abed El Rahman Hassoun (Lebanon) Lead Authors: Najet Aroua (Algeria), Virginie Baldy (France), Magda Bou Dagher (Lebanon), Cristina Branquinho (Portugal), Jean-Claude Dutay (France), Monia El Bour (Tunisia), Frédéric Médail (France), Meryem Mojtahid (Morocco/France), Alejandra Morán-Ordóñez (Spain), Pier Paolo Roggero (Italy), Sergio Rossi Heras (Italy), Bertrand Schatz (France), Ioannis N.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Marine Biodiversity
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292115665 Arctic marine biodiversity CHAPTER · JANUARY 2016 READS 142 12 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Lis Lindal Jørgensen Philippe Archambault Institute of Marine Research in Norway Université du Québec à Rimouski UQAR 36 PUBLICATIONS 285 CITATIONS 137 PUBLICATIONS 1,574 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Dieter Piepenburg Jake Rice Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel Fisheries and Oceans Canada 71 PUBLICATIONS 1,705 CITATIONS 67 PUBLICATIONS 2,279 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Andrey V. Dolgov letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 19 February 2016 Chapter 36G. Arctic Ocean Contributors: Lis Lindal Jørgensen, Philippe Archambault, Claire Armstrong, Andrey Dolgov, Evan Edinger, Tony Gaston, Jon Hildebrand, Dieter Piepenburg, Walker Smith, Cecilie von Quillfeldt, Michael Vecchione, Jake Rice (Lead member) Referees: Arne Bjørge, Charles Hannah. 1. Introduction 1.1 State The Central Arctic Ocean and the marginal seas such as the Chukchi, East Siberian, Laptev, Kara, White, Greenland, Beaufort, and Bering Seas, Baffin Bay and the Canadian Archipelago (Figure 1) are among the least-known basins and bodies of water in the world ocean, because of their remoteness, hostile weather, and the multi-year (i.e., perennial) or seasonal ice cover. Even the well-studied Barents and Norwegian Seas are partly ice covered during winter and information during this period is sparse or lacking. The Arctic has warmed at twice the global rate, with sea- ice loss accelerating (Figure 2, ACIA, 2004; Stroeve et al., 2012, Chapter 46 in this report), especially along the coasts of Russia, Alaska, and the Canadian Archipelago (Post et al., 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12 Lecture
    ChapterChapter 1 12 Clickers Lecture Essentials of Oceanography Eleventh Edition Marine Life and the Marine Environment Alan P. Trujillo Harold V. Thurman © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Overview • Living organisms, including marine species, are classified by characteristics. • Marine organisms are adapted to the ocean’s physical properties. • The marine environment has distinct divisions. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Classification of Life • Classification based on physical characteristics • DNA sequencing allows genetic comparison. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Classification of Life • Living and nonliving things made of atoms • Life consumes energy from environment. • NASA’s definition encompasses potential for extraterrestrial life. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Classification of Life • Working definition of life • Living things can – Capture, store, and transmit energy – Reproduce – Adapt to environment – Change over time © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Classification of Life • Three domains or superkingdoms • Bacteria – simple life forms without nuclei • Archaea – simple, microscopic creatures • Eukarya – complex, multicellular organisms – Plants and animals – DNA in discrete nucleus © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Classification of Living Organisms • Five kingdoms – Monera – Protoctista – Fungi – Plantae – Animalia © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Five Kingdoms of Organisms • Monera – Simplest organisms, single-celled – Cyanobacteria, heterotrophic bacteria, archaea • Protoctista – Single- and multicelled with nucleus –
    [Show full text]
  • Translation Series No.1839
    FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Translation Series No 1839 Marine neustbnology by Yu. P. Zaitsev Original title: - Morskaya Neistonologiya From: Marine Neustonology, Academy of Sciences of the . Ukrainian SSR, Kiev, : 5-262 '1970 Translated by the Translation Bureau(P. • Foreign Languages Division Department of the Secretary of State of Canada Fisheries Research Board of Canada Marine Ecology Laboratory Dartmouth, N. S. 1971_ 401 pages typescript , yu, ID. Zaltriev: arine -NoustonoIoGy, '.aukova duka",10v,.19 ri 2i Introduction ....... 1.44 •ed ' y .... .... »,. • Part .one. Peculiarity of ecoloi3ical conditions of th fflost u,pper reGion of the seas and oceans . ...... ;11 Qhapter I. Illumination, temperature and salinity of water..11 Chapter II. NonlivinG oranic matter 17• Chapter rh e Mololcal activity of sea. foam . • . • chapter IV. Enviroament biotic factors .55 ' Chapter V. co1oica1 peculiarity of "the near-surface sca 1 biotope as the cause of delopin speciai biolQe;ical . structure in it • • e• * 4 4, léte•e. •44 , •....42 Part two. :2éthods of neustonolo&ical research • • • . • Chapter VI. npDssibility of usin existin plFÂnton nct models for neustonoloical purooses . .4*;- Chaoter ome principals upon which the workinG out of .,' the method. of col ec 1rç ond studyin e:; sea neuston cre-bas .47 Direction of haulin and the up,it of_quantittiyo - Calculation , A A C C a 3 C AA•CAAC A A * ('s 47 Optimal se.:)ced of haulins by iaeans of a net . 143 I'animusa disturbance in the natural ;.ater stratification': 'and quantity of population in the net haulinÉ, sono . .51 • . Some technical properties of nets considered While • •roducini; gears for haulin hyponeuston .....
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15 Marrone
    Chapter 15 Life Near the Surface Pelagic Zone • Pelagic Zone – The vast open sea – Contains almost all of the liquid water on earth Pelagic Zone • Pelagic zone benefits – Regulates our climate – Provides food. • Pelagic organisms live suspended in the water • Lacks the solid substrate provided by the bottom • No place for attachment, no bottom for burrowing, nothing to hide behind Epipelagic Zone • Epipelagic – Upper pelagic – Zone from the surface down to a given depth commonly 200 m (650 ft) – Warmest – Best lit • The photic zone - area where photosynthesis can occur Epipelagic Zone • The epipelagic zone has two main components • Coastal or Nertic – epipelagic waters that lie over the continental shelf – Lies close to shore – Supports most of the world’s marine fisheries production • Oceanic part – Waters beyond the continental shelf The Organisms of the Epipelagic The Epipelagic Zone • Fueled by solar energy captured in photosynthesis • Nearly all primary production takes place within the epiplagic zone. • Supplies food to other communities The Epipelagic Zone • Lacks deposit feeders • Suspension feeders are very common • There are also many large predators like fishes, squids and marine mammals • Plankton is abundant Plankton Plankton • Plankton - live in the water column and cannot swim against the current. • Phytoplankton are autotrophs. – Perform photosynthesis • Zooplankton – are heterotrophs • Plankton can be grouped based on their size – Picoplankton – smallest – Nanoplankton – Microplankton – Mesoplankton – Macroplankton –
    [Show full text]