DOCSLIB.ORG

Geological Controls on Stratigraphy and Sedimentation of the Mississippian Marshall Formation, Michigan Basin, U.S.A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-2015 Geological Controls on Stratigraphy and Sedimentation of the Mississippian Marshall Formation, Michigan Basin, U.S.A. Joseph G. Adducci Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons, Geomorphology Commons, and the Sedimentology Commons Recommended Citation Adducci, Joseph G., "Geological Controls on Stratigraphy and Sedimentation of the Mississippian Marshall Formation, Michigan Basin, U.S.A." (2015). Master's Theses. 617. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/617 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GEOLOGICAL CONTROLS ON STRATIGRAPHY AND SEDIMENTATION OF THE MISSISSIPPIAN MARSHALL FORMATION, MICHIGAN BASIN, U.S.A by Joseph G. Adducci A thesis Submitted to the Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Geosciences Western Michigan University August 2015 Thesis Committee: David A. Barnes, Ph.D. (Chair) William B. Harrison, III, Ph.D. Peter J. Voice, Ph.D. GEOLOGICAL CONTROLS ON STRATIGRAPHY AND SEDIMENTATION OF THE MISSISSIPPIAN MARSHALL FORMATION, MICHIGAN BASIN, U.S.A. Joseph G. Adducci, M.S. Western Michigan University, 2015 An understanding of regional orogenic, climatic, and eustatic processes is critical to the interbasinal correlation of Paleozoic strata in eastern North America. Tectonic activity associated with the culmination of Appalachian Orogenic events has been shown to have regional influence on paleostructure and sediment dispersal in the Appalachian foreland basin and adjacent intracratonic Illinois and Michigan basins. The culmination of the Acadian Orogeny at the end of the Devonian represents the beginning of a period of general tectonic quiescence extending throughout the early and middle Mississippian in eastern North America. Early Mississippian strata in the Michigan basin is distinctive and marks the transition from marine shale and carbonate dominated sedimentation during much of the Late Ordovician through Late Devonian to siliciclastic dominated deposition throughout much of the Carboniferous. The Osagian, Marshall Formation constitutes an important coarse-grained siliciclastic formation in the Michigan basin. Despite numerous outcrop studies and early subsurface investigations, the Marshall remains poorly understood in terms of depositional controls and stratigraphic relationships to related Mississippian strata in Michigan and correlative strata in adjacent basins. This work documents sedimentological and sequence stratigraphic relationships in Early-Middle Mississippian, generally clastics-dominated strata of the Marshall and lower Michigan formations (as described in previous literature). New stratigraphic relationships are presented suggesting that the Marshall Formation and informal Stray sandstone units are genetically related and reflect tectonic, eustatic and climatic processes that occurred in the Michigan basin during the early Carboniferous in the Michigan basin. Copyright by Joseph G. Adducci 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to sincerely thank my thesis committee chair, Dr. David Barnes for his unwavering support, unflinching confidence in my ability and fond characterization of myself as “the most cautious geologist”. Without his encouragement, I would not have had the courage to attempt this work. I also thank the other members of my committee, Dr. William B. Harrison III and Dr. Peter Voice for their guidance and attentiveness to my research. My parents Melinda Adducci, Gregory Adducci, Rebecca Adducci and Joseph DuMouchelle will forever have my gratitude and thanks for their encouragement and support throughout this research, having been there with me every step of the way. Lastly, I thank my girlfriend, Marie Samson for her compassion, kindness and monumental effort in helping me complete this work. From cooking late-night dinners at home to spending anniversaries professionally photographing cored rock samples, she has endured this work with me and for this; I dedicate this thesis to her. Joseph G. Adducci ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................. ii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................. vii CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 1 Michigan Basin Structure and Subsidence .................................. 2 Early Carboniferous Regional Tectonics and Eustasy ................. 3 Regional Stratigraphy of the Early Mississippian ....................... 6 Michigan Basin: Kinderhookian-Osagian Stratigraphy and Deposition .................................................................................... 10 Research Questions ...................................................................... 13 II. DATA AND METHODOLOGY ....................................................... 15 Core Materials .............................................................................. 15 Wireline Log Data........................................................................ 18 Thin Sections ............................................................................... 18 III. SEDIMENTOLOGY ......................................................................... 21 Depositional Facies ...................................................................... 21 Facies D1: Fossiliferous Mudstone ........................................ 21 Facies D2-A: Cross Bedded Lithic Sandstone ....................... 23 Facies D2-B: Intraclastic Lithic Sandstone............................ 26 Facies D3: Bioturbated Lithic Sandstone .............................. 26 Facies D4: Finely Laminated Lithic Sandstone ..................... 30 iii Table of Contents-continued CHAPTER Facies D5: Structureless Sandstone ....................................... 30 Facies D6: Heterolithic Sandstone/Mudstone ........................ 32 Facies D7: Dolomitic Mudstone/Wackestone ....................... 33 Facies D8: Laminated Dolomite/Anhydrite ........................... 34 Wave-Dominated Clastic Depositional Systems ......................... 37 Barrier Shoreface and Strandplain Environments ........................ 38 Coastal Sabkhas and Shallow Marine Evaporites ........................ 40 Western Canada Sedimentary Basin: Triassic Analogue ............. 42 Facies Associations and Interpretation ........................................ 47 Facies D1: Offshore Marine................................................... 47 Facies D2-A: Middle-Lower Shoreface ................................. 49 Facies D2-B: Middle Shoreface ............................................. 49 Facies D3: Middle-Upper Shoreface ..................................... 50 Facies D4: Foreshore ............................................................. 50 Facies D5: Backshore ............................................................ 51 Facies D6: Intertidal ............................................................... 51 Facies D7: Restricted Lagoon ................................................ 52 Facies D8: Coastal Sabkha ..................................................... 53 Depositional Model ...................................................................... 57 iv Table of Contents-continued CHAPTER Flooding Surfaces and Associated Ravinement ........................... 59 IV. PETROPHYSICAL ROCK MATRIX ANALYSIS .......................... 64 Core-to-Log Correlation/Calibration ........................................... 67 Facies Association Mapping ........................................................ 70 Log Facies L1-A/B ................................................................ 72 Log Facies L2 ........................................................................ 73 Log Facies L3 ........................................................................ 73 Facies Mapping ............................................................................ 74 Isopach Map L1-A ................................................................. 75 Isopach Map L1-B ................................................................. 75 Isopach Map L2 ..................................................................... 76 Isopach Map L3 ..................................................................... 80 V. SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY ....................................................... 83 VI. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................. 90 Early Mississippian Paleoclimate, Tectonics and Eustasy .......... 90 Paleoclimate ........................................................................... 91 Eustasy ................................................................................... 92 Tectonics ................................................................................ 93 v Table of Contents-continued CHAPTER The Michigan “Stray” Problem ................................................... 95 Conclusions .................................................................................. 97 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................
Recommended publications

  • Hydrogeologic Framework of Mississippian Rocks in the Central Lower Peninsula of Michigan

    Hydrogeologic Framework of Mississippian Rocks in the Central Lower Peninsula of Michigan By D.B. WESTJOHN and T.L. WEAVER U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4246 Lansing, Michigan 1996 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm name in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey, WRD Earth Science Information Center 6520 Mercantile Way, Suite 5 Open-File Reports Section Lansing, Ml 48911 Box 25286, MS 517 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Abstract .......................................................... 1 Introduction ....................................................... 1 Geology .......................................................... 3 Coldwater Shale ................................................ 3 Marshall Sandstone .............................................. 6 Michigan Formation .............................................. 7 Hydrogeologic framework of Mississippian rocks ................................ 8 Relations of stratigraphic units to aquifer and confining units .................... 8 Delineation of aquifer- and confining-unit boundaries ......................... 9 Description of confining units and the Marshall aquifer ........................ 9 Michigan confining
  • PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1418 USGS Cience for a Changing World AVAILABILITY of BOOKS and MAPS of the U.S

    PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1418 USGS Cience for a Changing World AVAILABILITY of BOOKS and MAPS of the U.S

    PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1418 USGS cience for a changing world AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the current- year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publica­ tions released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that may be listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" may be no longer available. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books and Maps Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books and maps of the U.S. Geological Survey are available niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications over the counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey Earth of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single Science Information Centers (ESIC's), all of which are authorized copies of Preliminary Determination of Epicenters, and some mis­ agents of the Superintendent of Documents: cellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are ANCHORAGE, Alaska Rm. 101,4230 University Dr. obtainable by mail from LAKEWOOD, Colorado Federal Center, Bldg. 810 U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services MENLO PARK, California Bldg. 3, Rm.
  • Cambrian Ordovician

    Cambrian Ordovician

    Open File Report LXXVI the shale is also variously colored. Glauconite is generally abundant in the formation. The Eau Claire A Summary of the Stratigraphy of the increases in thickness southward in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan where it becomes much more Southern Peninsula of Michigan * dolomitic. by: The Dresbach sandstone is a fine to medium grained E. J. Baltrusaites, C. K. Clark, G. V. Cohee, R. P. Grant sandstone with well rounded and angular quartz grains. W. A. Kelly, K. K. Landes, G. D. Lindberg and R. B. Thin beds of argillaceous dolomite may occur locally in Newcombe of the Michigan Geological Society * the sandstone. It is about 100 feet thick in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan but is absent in Northern Indiana. The Franconia sandstone is a fine to medium grained Cambrian glauconitic and dolomitic sandstone. It is from 10 to 20 Cambrian rocks in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan feet thick where present in the Southern Peninsula. consist of sandstone, dolomite, and some shale. These * See last page rocks, Lake Superior sandstone, which are of Upper Cambrian age overlie pre-Cambrian rocks and are The Trempealeau is predominantly a buff to light brown divided into the Jacobsville sandstone overlain by the dolomite with a minor amount of sandy, glauconitic Munising. The Munising sandstone at the north is dolomite and dolomitic shale in the basal part. Zones of divided southward into the following formations in sandy dolomite are in the Trempealeau in addition to the ascending order: Mount Simon, Eau Claire, Dresbach basal part. A small amount of chert may be found in and Franconia sandstones overlain by the Trampealeau various places in the formation.
  • Stratigraphic Succession in Lower Peninsula of Michigan

    Stratigraphic Succession in Lower Peninsula of Michigan

    STRATIGRAPHIC DOMINANT LITHOLOGY ERA PERIOD EPOCHNORTHSTAGES AMERICANBasin Margin Basin Center MEMBER FORMATIONGROUP SUCCESSION IN LOWER Quaternary Pleistocene Glacial Drift PENINSULA Cenozoic Pleistocene OF MICHIGAN Mesozoic Jurassic ?Kimmeridgian? Ionia Sandstone Late Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Conemaugh Grand River Formation Geological Survey Division Late Harold Fitch, State Geologist Pennsylvanian and Saginaw Formation ?Pottsville? Michigan Basin Geological Society Early GEOL IN OG S IC A A B L N Parma Sandstone S A O G C I I H E C T I Y Bayport Limestone M Meramecian Grand Rapids Group 1936 Late Michigan Formation Stratigraphic Nomenclature Project Committee: Mississippian Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos, Co-chairman Mark S. Wollensak, Co-chairman Osagian Marshall Sandstone Principal Authors: Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos Early Kinderhookian Coldwater Shale Dr. William Harrison III Robert Reynolds Sunbury Shale Dr. Dave B.Westjohn Mark S. Wollensak Berea Sandstone Chautauquan Bedford Shale 2000 Late Antrim Shale Senecan Traverse Formation Traverse Limestone Traverse Group Erian Devonian Bell Shale Dundee Limestone Middle Lucas Formation Detroit River Group Amherstburg Form. Ulsterian Sylvania Sandstone Bois Blanc Formation Garden Island Formation Early Bass Islands Dolomite Sand Salina G Unit Paleozoic Glacial Clay or Silt Late Cayugan Salina F Unit Till/Gravel Salina E Unit Salina D Unit Limestone Salina C Shale Salina Group Salina B Unit Sandy Limestone Salina A-2 Carbonate Silurian Salina A-2 Evaporite Shaley Limestone Ruff Formation
  • XRF Workshop Book

    XRF Workshop Book

    Workshop Materials (1 of 2) Table of Contents Workshop Materials (book 1 of 2) Page Agenda 1 Welcome Presentation (Steve Kaczmarek) 3 Lectures Introduction to the Chemistry of Rocks and Minerals (Peter Voice) 7 Geology of Michigan (Bill Harrison) 22 XRF Theory (Steve Kaczmarek) 44 Student Research Posters Silurian A-1 Carbonate (Matt Hemenway) 56 Silurian Burnt Bluff Group (Mohamed Al Musawi) 58 Classroom Activities Powder Problem 60 Fossil Free For All 69 Bridge to Nowhere 76 Get to Know Your Pet Rock 90 Forensic XRF 92 Alien Agua 96 Appendices (book 2 of 2) Appendix A: MGRRE Factsheet 105 Appendix B: Michigan Natural Resources Statistics 107 Appendix C: CoreKids Outreach Program 126 Appendix D: Graphing & Statistical Analysis Activity 138 Appendix E: K-12 Science Performance Expectations 144 Appendix F: Workshop Evaluation Form 179 Workshop Facilitators Bridging the Gap between Geology & Chemistry Sponsored by the Western Michigan University, the Michigan Geological Repository for Research and Education, and the U.S. National Science Foundation This workshop is for educators interested in learning more about the chemistry of geologic materials. Wednesday, August 9, 2017 (8 am - 5 pm) Tentative Agenda 8:00-8:20: Welcome (Steve Kaczmarek) Agenda, Safety, & Introductions 8:20-8:50: Introduction to Geological Materials (Peter Voice) An introduction to rocks, minerals, and their elemental chemistry 8:50-9:00: Questions/Discussion 9:00-9:30: Introduction to MI Basin Geology (Bill Harrison) An introduction to the common rock types and economic
  • Summary of Hydrogelogic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan. Apple, B.A., and H.W. Reeves 2007. U.S. Geological Surve

    Summary of Hydrogelogic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan. Apple, B.A., and H.W. Reeves 2007. U.S. Geological Surve

    In cooperation with the State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan Open-File Report 2007-1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan By Beth A. Apple and Howard W. Reeves In cooperation with the State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality Open-File Report 2007-1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation Beth, A. Apple and Howard W. Reeves, 2007, Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michi- gan. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1236, 78 p. Cover photographs Clockwise from upper left: Photograph of Pretty Lake by Gary Huffman. Photograph of a river in winter by Dan Wydra. Photographs of Lake Michigan and the Looking Glass River by Sharon Baltusis. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1
  • Description of the Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon Quadrangles

    Description of the Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon Quadrangles

    DESCRIPTION OF THE HOLLIDAYSBURG AND HUNTINGDON QUADRANGLES By Charles Butts INTRODUCTION 1 BLUE RIDGE PROVINCE topography are therefore prominent ridges separated by deep SITUATION The Blue Ridge province, narrow at its north end in valleys, all trending northeastward. The Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon quadrangles are adjoin­ Virginia and Pennsylvania, is over 60 miles wide in North RELIEF ing areas in the south-central part of Pennsylvania, in Blair, Carolina. It is a rugged region of hills and ridges and deep, The lowest point in the quadrangles is at Huntingdon, Bedford, and Huntingdon Counties. (See fig. 1.) Taken as narrow valleys. The altitude of the higher summits in Vir­ where the altitude of the river bed is about 610 feet above sea ginia is 3,000 to 5,700 feet, and in western North Carolina 79 level, and the highest point is the southern extremity of Brush Mount Mitchell, 6,711 feet high, is the highest point east of Mountain, north of Hollidaysburg, which is 2,520 feet above the Mississippi River. Throughout its extent this province sea level. The extreme relief is thus 1,910 feet. The Alle­ stands up conspicuously above the bordering provinces, from gheny Front and Dunning, Short, Loop, Lock, Tussey, Ter­ each of which it is separated by a steep, broken, rugged front race, and Broadtop Mountains rise boldly 800 to 1,500 feet from 1,000 to 3,000 feet high. In Pennsylvania, however, above the valley bottoms in a distance of 1 to 2 miles and are South Mountain, the northeast end of the Blue Ridge, is less the dominating features of the landscape.
  • Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes

    Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes

    35133_Geo_Michigan_Cover.qxd 11/13/07 10:26 AM Page 1 “The Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes” is written to augment any introductory earth science, environmental geology, geologic, or geographic course offering, and is designed to introduce students in Michigan and the Great Lakes to important regional geologic concepts and events. Although Michigan’s geologic past spans the Precambrian through the Holocene, much of the rock record, Pennsylvanian through Pliocene, is miss- ing. Glacial events during the Pleistocene removed these rocks. However, these same glacial events left behind a rich legacy of surficial deposits, various landscape features, lakes, and rivers. Michigan is one of the most scenic states in the nation, providing numerous recre- ational opportunities to inhabitants and visitors alike. Geology of the region has also played an important, and often controlling, role in the pattern of settlement and ongoing economic development of the state. Vital resources such as iron ore, copper, gypsum, salt, oil, and gas have greatly contributed to Michigan’s growth and industrial might. Ample supplies of high-quality water support a vibrant population and strong industrial base throughout the Great Lakes region. These water supplies are now becoming increasingly important in light of modern economic growth and population demands. This text introduces the student to the geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes region. It begins with the Precambrian basement terrains as they relate to plate tectonic events. It describes Paleozoic clastic and carbonate rocks, restricted basin salts, and Niagaran pinnacle reefs. Quaternary glacial events and the development of today’s modern landscapes are also discussed.
  • ECONOMIC GEOLOGY of the SAND and SANDSTONE RESOURCES of MICHIGAN

    ECONOMIC GEOLOGY of the SAND and SANDSTONE RESOURCES of MICHIGAN

    ECONOMIC GEOLOGY of the SAND and SANDSTONE RESOURCES of MICHIGAN Geological Survey Division Report of Investigation 21 By E. William Heinrich Copyright © 2001 by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Geological Survey Division (GSD). The DEQ GSD grants permission to publish or reproduce this document, all or in part, for non-profit purposes. The contents of this electronic document (whole or in part) can be used if, and only if, additional fees are not associated with the use or distribution of this document and credit is given to the DEQ GSD and the author(s). This copyright statement must appear in any and all electronic or print documents using this file or any part thereof. Contents of this Report PREFACE ............................................................................4 MARSHALL SANDSTONE ............................................... 20 ABSTRACT..........................................................................4 Grindstone Industry................................................... 20 INTRODUCTION..................................................................4 Napoleon Sandstone................................................. 20 MIDDLE PRECAMBRIAN QUARTZITES ...........................5 Previous Work................................................... 20 General Geology ............................................... 21 General........................................................................5 Quarries............................................................. 21 Mesnard Quartzite .......................................................5
  • Type Kinderhook Ammonoids

    Type Kinderhook Ammonoids

    Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 80 Number Article 6 1973 Type Kinderhook Ammonoids W. M. Furnish University of Iowa Walter L. Manger University of Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1973 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Furnish, W. M. and Manger, Walter L. (1973) "Type Kinderhook Ammonoids," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 80(1), 15-24. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol80/iss1/6 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Furnish and Manger: Type Kinderhook Ammonoids 15 Type Kinderhook Ammonoids W. M. FURNISH1 and WALTER L. MANGER FURNISH, W. M. and WALTER L. MANGER. Type Kinderhook Am­ and the associated conodont faunal data. The Kinderhookian monoids. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci., 80( 1): 15-24, 1973. Wassonville Member of the Hampton Formation in southeastern SYNOPSIS: Lower Mississippian rocks in the type area of North Iowa and the Chouteau Limestone of Missouri fall within the America have produced only a few scattered ammonoid cephalo­ lower "Pericyclus-Stufe" of the upper Tournaisian Stage as these pods. Those specimens from southeastern Iowa and northwestern units are designated for the early Lower Carboniferous of Western Missouri lie within the general vicinity of the designated type Europe.
  • MIDCONTINENT RIFT SYSTEM BIBLIOGRAPHY by Steven A

    MIDCONTINENT RIFT SYSTEM BIBLIOGRAPHY by Steven A

    MIDCONTINENT RIFT SYSTEM BIBLIOGRAPHY By Steven A. Hauck December 1995 Technical Report NRRI/TR-95/33 Funded by the Natural Resources Research Institute In Preparation for the 1995 International Geological Correlation Program Project 336 Field Conference in Duluth, MN Natural Resources Research Institute University of Minnesota, Duluth 5013 Miller Trunk Highway Duluth, MN 55811-1442 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................... 1 THE DATABASE .............................................. 1 Use of the PAPYRUS Retriever Program (Diskette) .............. 3 Updates, Questions, Comments, Etc. ......................... 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................... 4 MIDCONTINENT RIFT SYSTEM BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................... 5 AUTHOR INDEX ................................................. 191 KEYWORD INDEX ................................................ 216 i This page left blank intentionally. ii INTRODUCTION The co-chairs of the IGCP Project 336 field conference on the Midcontinent Rift System felt that a comprehensive bibliography of articles relating to a wide variety of subjects would be beneficial to individuals interested in, or working on, the Midcontinent Rift System. There are 2,543 references (>4.2 MB) included on the diskette at the back of this volume. PAPYRUS Bibliography System software by Research Software Design of Portland, Oregon, USA, was used in compiling the database. A retriever program (v. 7.0.011) for the database was provided by Research Software Design for use with the database. The retriever program allows the user to use the database without altering the contents of the database. However, the database can be used, changed, or augmented with a complete version of the program (ordering information can be found in the readme file). The retriever program allows the user to search the database and print from the database. The diskette contains compressed data files.
  • Geology of Fairfield County, Ohio

    Geology of Fairfield County, Ohio

    This dissertation has been 61—5134 microfilmed exactly as received WOLFE, Edward Winslow, 1936- GEOLOGY OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1961 Geology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan GEOLOGY OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Edward Winslow Wolfe, B. A. The Ohio State University 1961 Approved by Department of Geology ! ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks are due Mr. R. J. Bernhagen, State Geologist, who suggest­ ed the need for an investigation of the geology of Fairfield County. The writer is particularly indebted to Dr. Aurele La Rooque who di­ rected the investigation and guided the writer throughout the prepara­ tion of this report. Many others gave freely of their time in dis­ cussing with the writer the geology of Fairfield County. Among these, special thanks are due Dr. Jane L. Forsyth of the Ohio Division of Geological Survey, Mr. George J. Franklin, who is presently completing a report on the geology of Licking County, and the writer's colleagues in the Department of Geology at the College of Wooster. The writer thanks several members of the Ohio Division of Geological Survey, in­ cluding Miss Pauline Smyth, Mr. Karl V. Hoover, and Mr. Harold J. Flint, for their valuable assistance. Most helpful, too, was the as­ sistance of Mr. Jon S. Galehouse during the summer of i960. The field work was sponsored and financed by the Ohio Division of Geological Survey. Additional financial aid, in the form of a William H.