Lajos Kossuth Sent Word
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hungary's Policy Towards Its Kin Minorities
Hungary’s policy towards its kin minorities: The effects of Hungary’s recent legislative measures on the human rights situation of persons belonging to its kin minorities Óscar Alberto Lema Bouza Supervisor: Prof. Zsolt Körtvélyesi Second Semester University: Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Budapest, Hungary Academic Year 2012/2013 Óscar A. Lema Bouza Abstract Abstract: This thesis focuses on the recent legislative measures introduced by Hungary aimed at kin minorities in the neighbouring countries. Considering as relevant the ones with the largest Hungarian minorities (i.e. Croatia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia and Ukraine), the thesis starts by presenting the background to the controversy, looking at the history, demographics and politics of the relevant states. After introducing the human rights standards contained in international and national legal instruments for the protection of minorities, the thesis looks at the reasons behind the enactment of the laws. To do so the politically dominant concept of Hungarian nation is examined. Finally, the author looks at the legal and political restrictions these measures face from the perspective of international law and the reactions of the affected countries, respectively. The research shows the strong dependency between the measures and the political conception of the nation, and points out the lack of amelioration of the human rights situation of ethnic Hungarians in the said countries. The reason given for this is the little effects produced on them by the measures adopted by Hungary and the potentially prejudicial nature of the reaction by the home states. The author advocates for a deeper cooperation between Hungary and the home states. Keywords: citizenship, ethnic preference, Fundamental Law, home state, human rights, Hungary, kin state, minorities, nation, Nationality Law, preferential treatment,Status Law. -
A TRANSYLVANIAN INTERLUDE on 11 June 1848 Dumitru Brătianu Had
A TRANSYLVANIAN INTERLUDE On 11 June 1848 Dumitru Brătianu had received his accreditation as diplomatic agent in troubled Austria-Hungary, as the first diplomatic representative of modern Romania.221 Until then, Romanian interests abroad had been represented by officials of the Ottoman suzerain power. He travelled via Vienna, where the situation was confused after the collapse of the interim government led by Karl Ludwig von Fic- quelmont, and reached Pest in late June. Since March, under popular pressure, the Habsburg monarchy appeared to have imploded. Vienna as the official centre of power in the Empire was now challenged by Central European “staging-points in the multilateral contestation” during the events of 1848–49:222 Milan, Buda-Pest,223 Prague, Lemberg, Cracow, Timişoara, Braşov, Blaj and Cluj – to mention just a few of the cities engulfed by the protests – were all bursting with revolu- tionary ferment, political and territorial demands and potential multi- ethnic strife. Only one element in the confusing political landscape of 1848–49 remained stable: the now beleaguered Habsburg dynasty and the principle of dynastic loyalty as the pivotal centre of an otherwise explosive multi-national conundrum. After March and especially after the enactment of the April Laws by the Hungarian Diet, the new Hungarian regime had been operat- ing on the basis of a virtual, if brittle, parliamentary sovereignty and autonomy from Austria. A reformist Hungarian government led by Lajos Batthyány comprised the liberal István Széchenyi, the ‘roman- tic hero’ Lajos Kossuth and the ‘man of the future’, Ferenc Deák.224 Embedded within, and extending beyond, the complex network of constitutional, political, economic and military difficulties facing the empire was the thorny nationalities question. -
A Nemzetiségi Kérdés Kossuth És Kortársai Szemében
A nemzetiségi kérdés Kossuth és kortársai szemében BELVEDERE Kiskönyvtár 15. A nemzetiségi kérdés Kossuth és kortársai szemében KISKÖNYVTÁR 15. A nemzetiségi kérdés Kossuth és kortársai szemében Szerkesztette: Kiss Gábor Ferenc Zakar Péter BM#EDERE Szeged, 2003 A kötet megjelenését támogatták Nemzeti Kulturális Örökség Minisztériuma ^ y Oktatási Minisztérium Szegedi Tudományegyetem SZTE Juhász Gyula Tanárképző Főiskolai Kar SZTE JGYTFK HÖK SZTE EHÖK Kulturális Bizottság IV. Béla Kör Magyar Történelmi Társulat Csongrád megyei és Szegedi Csoportja Szegedért Alapítvány Szegedi Román Kisebbségi Önkormányzat Magyarországi Románok Országos Szövetsége NEMZETI KULTURÁLIS ÖRÖKSÉG MINISZTÉRIUMA Kossuth Emlékév Titkársága ! SZTE Egyetemi Könyvtár ISBN 963 8624 6 X ISSN 1217-3495 © Belvedere Méridionale, 2003 Beköszöntő Számtalan példa volt rá, hogy amikor Rákóczi kiáltványáról felelt a hallga- tó, a hangzatos fordítással - „Megújultanak a dicső magyar nemzet se- bei"-adta vissza a „Recrudescunt inclitae gentis Hungáriáé vulnera" kez- dő szavakat. Ilyenkor mindig ki kellett javítanom, hogy az eredetiben bizony másképpen van. Rákóczi ugyanis nagyon is tisztában volt az ország etnikai sokszínűségével, ezért választékosan és precízen fogalmazott, ami- kor Hungária „dicső népének" sebeiről beszélt. Ez a - középkorból jól adatolható, öntudatos - Hungarus szemlélet azonban a nemzetiségek „ön- tudatra" ébredésének időszakában elhalványult, sőt - egyesek szemében - teljesen korszerűtlenné vált. Erről a változásról azonban a magyar poli- tikusi garnitúra sem -
Habsburg History Habsburg
Gerő András–Tormássy Zsuzsanna (szerk.) HABSBURG TÖRTÉNETI INTÉZET 2003–2010 INSTITUTE OF HABSBURG HISTORY 2003–2010 by András Gerő–Zsuzsanna Tormássy (eds.) Habsburg-kori Kutatások Közalapítvány Habsburg Történeti Intézet Cím: 1054 Budapest, Báthory u. 20. Telefon: 36-1-225-3348 Fax: 36-1-225-3349 E-mail: [email protected] Honlap: www.habsburg.org.hu Felelős kiadó: Gerő András Szerkesztő: Gerő András–Tormássy Zsuzsanna Fordítás: Alen Campbell Támogató: Oktatási és Kulturális Minisztérium Public Foundation for Habsburg Studies Institute of Habsburg History Address: 1054 Budapest, Báthory u. 20. Tel: 36-1-225-3348 Fax: 36-1-225-3349 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.habsburg.org.hu Editor-in-chief: András Gerő Editors: András Gerő–Zsuzsanna Tormássy Translated by Alen Campbell Supported by the Ministry of Education and Culture ISBN 978-963-287-035-9 TARTALOM • CONTENTS ELŐSZÓ PREFACE ÁLLAMI SZÁMVEVŐSZÉK JELENTÉSE REPORT BY ÁLLAMI SZÁMVEVŐSZÉK A KÖZALAPÍTVÁNYNÁL 2009-BEN (STATE AUDIT OFFICE) ON ITS 2009 VÉGZETT VIZSGÁLATÁRÓL INSPECTION OF THE FOUNDATION HABSBURG-KORI KUTATÁSOK PUBLIC FOUNDATION FOR HABSBURG KÖZALAPÍTVÁNY STUDIES Kuratórium Board Felügyelőbizottság Supervisory Board A Közalapítvány titkársága Foundation offi ce staff HABSBURG TÖRTÉNETI INTÉZET INSTITUTE OF HABSBURG HISTORY Igazgató Director Tudományos tanácsadók Academic Advisers A HABSBURG TÖRTÉNETI INTÉZET ACADEMIC ACTIVITIES OF THE INSTITUTE OF TUDOMÁNYOS MŰKÖDÉSE HABSBURG HISTORY Ösztöndíjak Scholarships Kutatási programok Research programmes Könyvkiadás belföldön és külföldön Book publishing in Hungary and abroad Rendezvények Events Intézményes szakmai együttműködés Collaboration with other institutions Életműdíjak Lifetime achievement awards 3 ELŐSZÓ özép-Európa történetírását és a történelemről való gondolkodását so- káig egyfajta bezárkózás jellemezte. Üdítő kivételektől eltekintve az itt élő népek, nemzetek főként saját etnikumukkal foglalkoztak, és nagy- jából-egészében fi gyelmen kívül hagyták azt a tényt, amit történelmük Kkölcsönös egymásrautaltsága jelentett. -
56 Stories Desire for Freedom and the Uncommon Courage with Which They Tried to Attain It in 56 Stories 1956
For those who bore witness to the 1956 Hungarian Revolution, it had a significant and lasting influence on their lives. The stories in this book tell of their universal 56 Stories desire for freedom and the uncommon courage with which they tried to attain it in 56 Stories 1956. Fifty years after the Revolution, the Hungar- ian American Coalition and Lauer Learning 56 Stories collected these inspiring memoirs from 1956 participants through the Freedom- Fighter56.com oral history website. The eyewitness accounts of this amazing mod- Edith K. Lauer ern-day David vs. Goliath struggle provide Edith Lauer serves as Chair Emerita of the Hun- a special Hungarian-American perspective garian American Coalition, the organization she and pass on the very spirit of the Revolu- helped found in 1991. She led the Coalition’s “56 Stories” is a fascinating collection of testimonies of heroism, efforts to promote NATO expansion, and has incredible courage and sacrifice made by Hungarians who later tion of 1956 to future generations. been a strong advocate for maintaining Hun- became Americans. On the 50th anniversary we must remem- “56 Stories” contains 56 personal testimo- garian education and culture as well as the hu- ber the historical significance of the 1956 Revolution that ex- nials from ’56-ers, nine stories from rela- man rights of 2.5 million Hungarians who live posed the brutality and inhumanity of the Soviets, and led, in due tives of ’56-ers, and a collection of archival in historic national communities in countries course, to freedom for Hungary and an untold number of others. -
Kmety Györgyre Kiművelt Emberfők Fullerének: Szépség És Hasznosság
Magyar Tudomány A Római Birodalom ökológiai hatásai Hetvenéves fehér folt Emlékezés Guyon Richárdra és Kmety Györgyre Kiművelt emberfők Fullerének: szépség és hasznosság 13•9511 Magyar Tudomány • 2013/9 A Magyar Tudományos Akadémia folyóirata. Alapítás éve: 1840 174. évfolyam – 2013/9. szám TARTALOM Tanulmány Grüll Tibor: A Római Birodalom ökológiai hatásai ………………………………… 1026 Hargittai István: Hetvenéves fehér folt ……………………………………………… 1035 Hóvári János: Honvédtábornokok a késői oszmán haderőben. Főszerkesztő: Emlékezés Guyon Richárdra és Kmety Györgyre ……………………………… 1046 Csányi Vilmos Hermann Róbert: Két honvédtábornok, akikből török pasa lett – kétszáz éve született Guyon Richárd és Kmety György …………………………… 1056 Szerkesztőbizottság: Lovász László: Kiművelt emberfők ………………………………………………… 1071 Bencze Gyula, Bozó László, Császár Ákos, Hamza Gábor, Gángó Gábor: Eötvös József a „materialisták” ellen. Kovács Ferenc, Ludassy Mária, Solymosi Frigyes, A magyar orvosok és természetvizsgálók vándorgyűlésének újraengedélyezése Spät András, Szegedy-Maszák Mihály, Vámos Tibor és a Gondolatok keletkezése ……………………………………………………… 1081 Gyarmathy Éva: Diszlexia, a tanulás/tanítás és a tudományok a digitális kultúrában. A lapot készítették: Egy tranziens korszak dilemmái ……………………………………………… 1086 Elek László, Gazdag Kálmánné, Halmos Tamás, Holló Virág, Baranyi József – Jóźwiak Ákos – Varga László – Mézes Miklós – Majoros Klára, Makovecz Benjamin, Matskási István, Beczner Judit – Farkas József: A hálózatkutatás, a bioinformatika Perecz László, Sipos Júlia, Szabados -
A Monumental Debate in Budapest: the Hentzi Statue and the Limits of Austro-Hungarian Reconciliation, 1852–1918
A Monumental Debate in Budapest: The Hentzi Statue and the Limits of Austro-Hungarian Reconciliation, 1852–1918 MICHAEL LAURENCE MILLER WO OF THE MOST ICONIC PHOTOS of the 1956 Hungarian revolution involve a colossal statue of Stalin, erected in 1951 and toppled on the first day of the anti-Soviet uprising. TOne of these pictures shows Stalin’s decapitated head, abandoned in the street as curious pedestrians amble by. The other shows a tall stone pedestal with nothing on it but a lonely pair of bronze boots. Situated near Heroes’ Square, Hungary’s national pantheon, the Stalin statue had served as a symbol of Hungary’s subjugation to the Soviet Union; and its ceremonious and deliberate destruction provided a poignant symbol for the fall of Stalinism. Thirty-eight years before, at the beginning of an earlier Hungarian revolution, another despised statue was toppled in Budapest, also marking a break from foreign subjugation, albeit to a different power. Unlike the Stalin statue, which stood for only five years, this statue—the so-called Hentzi Monument—had been “a splinter in the eye of the [Hungarian] nation” for sixty-six years. Perceived by many Hungarians as a symbol of “national humiliation” at the hands of the Habsburgs, the Hentzi Monument remained mired in controversy from its unveiling in 1852 until its destruction in 1918. The object of street demonstrations and parliamentary disorder in 1886, 1892, 1898, and 1899, and the object of a failed “assassination” attempt in 1895, the Hentzi Monument was even implicated in the fall of a Hungarian prime minister. -
HSR Vol. XLV, Nos. 1-2 (Spring-Fall, 2018)
Hungarian Studies Review, Vol. XLV, Nos. 1-2 (Spring-Fall, 2018) In this volume: Jason Kovacs reviews the history of the birth of the first Hungarian settlements on the Canadian Prairies. Aliaksandr Piahanau tells the story of the Hungarian democrats’ relations with the Czechoslovak authorities during the interwar years. Agatha Schwartz writes about trauma and memory in the works of Vojvodina authors László Végel and Anna Friedrich. And Gábor Hollósi offers an overview of the doctrine of the Holy Crown of Hungary. Plus book reviews by Agatha Schwartz and Steven Jobbitt A note from the editor: After editing this journal for four-and-a-half decades, advanced age and the diagnosis of a progressive neurological disease prompt me to resign as editor and producer of this journal. The Hungarian Studies Review will continue in one form or another under the leadership of Professors Steven Jobbitt and Árpád von Klimo, the Presidents res- pectively of the Hungarian Studies Association of Canada and the Hungarian Studies Association (of the U.S.A.). Inquiries regarding the journal’s future volumes should be directed to them. The contact addresses are the Departments of History at (for Professor Jobbitt) Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, RB 3016, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada, P7B 5E1. [email protected] (and for Prof. von Klimo) the Catholic University of America, 620 Michigan Ave. NE, Washing- ton DC, USA, 20064. [email protected] . Nándor Dreisziger Hungarian Studies Review, Vol. XLV, Nos. 1-2 (Spring-Fall, 2018) Contents Articles: The First Hungarian Settlements in Western Canada: Hun’s Valley, Esterhaz-Kaposvar, Otthon, and Bekevar JASON F. -
Szemere Bertalan És Leánya, Szemere Mária Családtagjaikról Szóló Írásai* the Writings of Bertalan Szemere and His
1 Történelem és Muzeológia – Internetes Folyóirat Miskolcon 5. (2018–2019)/1–2. History & Museology: Online Journal in Miskolc, Hungary, 5 (2018–2019)/1–2. Szemere Bertalan és leánya, Szemere Mária családtagjaikról szóló írásai* GYULAI ÉVA The writings of Bertalan Szemere and his daughter: Maria Szemere on their family members Szemere Bertalan szépírói munkái 150 évvel ezelőtt jelentek meg először és utoljára leánya, Szemere Mária szerkesztésében és hathatós közreműködésével, és az utolsó irodalomkritika is több mint 110 évvel ezelőtt foglalkozott velük. Azóta szinte feledésbe merültek, vagy, ami még rosszabb, közönybe fulladtak. Az utókor Szemere írásainak csak három, műfajában is elkülönülő csoportjával foglalkozik: reformkori útinaplójával, beszédeivel és emigrációban született naplóival, ezekkel is inkább mint tör- téneti forrásokkal, semmint irodalmi alkotásokkal. A politika csúcsára jutott Szemere Bertalant keve- sen, köztük Kiss Ernő (1868–1931), a piarista szerzetes tanárból lett irodalomtörténész tekintette szép- írónak az Erdélyi Múzeumban 1908-ban megjelent tanulmányában,1 illetve Csorba Zoltán Miskolc és Borsod irodalmi múltjáról írt tanulmánykötetében elemzi szépirodalmi tevékenységét, igaz, családtag- jaira való emlékezéseivel alig foglalkozik. 2 1. SOMOGYI László: Szemere Bertalan borsodi követ, 1836 Ceruzarajzról készült üvegnegatív (HOM FN Ltsz. 10235) *A tanulmány és a kutatás az EFOP-3.6.1-16-00011 jelű Fiatalodó és Megújuló Egyetem – Innovatív Tudásváros – a Miskolci Egyetem intelligens szakosodást szolgáló intézményi fejlesztése című projekt részeként – a Széchenyi 2020 keretében – az Európai Unió támogatásával, az Európai Szociális Alap társfinanszírozásával valósul meg. 1 KISS 1908; KISS 1912. 218.; 224. 2 CSORBA 1961, újraközlése: CSORBA 1994. Porkoláb Tibornak köszönöm, hogy Csorba Zoltán tanulmányára felhívta a figyelmemet. Csorba Zoltán a Mária emlékezete c. írás alapján Szemere Mária halálának és sírjának helyszíneként Csobaj helyett, tévesen, Tokajt nevezi meg. -
Download This Report
STRUGGLING FOR ETHNIETHNICC IDENTITYC IDENTITY Ethnic Hungarians in PostPostPost-Post---CeausescuCeausescu Romania Helsinki Watch Human Rights Watch New York !!! Washington !!! Los Angeles !!! London Copyright 8 September 1993 by Human Rights Watch All Rights Reserved. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN 1-56432-115-0 LCCN: 93-80429 Cover photo: Ethnic Hungarians, carrying books and candles, peacefully demonstrating in the central Transylvanian city of Tîrgu Mure’ (Marosv|s|rhely), February 9-10, 1990. The Hungarian and Romanian legends on the signs they carry read: We're Demonstrating for Our Sweet Mother Tongue! Give back the Bolyai High School, Bolyai University! We Want Hungarian Schools! We Are Not Alone! Helsinki Watch Committee Helsinki Watch was formed in 1978 to monitor and promote domestic and international compliance with the human rights provisions of the 1975 Helsinki Accords. The Chair is Jonathan Fanton; Vice Chair, Alice Henkin; Executive Director, Jeri Laber; Deputy Director, Lois Whitman; Counsel, Holly Cartner and Julie Mertus; Research Associates, Erika Dailey, Rachel Denber, Ivana Nizich and Christopher Panico; Associates, Christina Derry, Ivan Lupis, Alexander Petrov and Isabelle Tin- Aung. Helsinki Watch is affiliated with the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, which is based in Vienna, Austria. HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Human Rights Watch conducts regular, systematic investigations of human rights abuses in some sixty countries around the world. It addresses the human rights practices of governments of all political stripes, of all geopolitical alignments, and of all ethnic and religious persuasions. In internal wars it documents violations by both governments and rebel groups. Human Rights Watch defends freedom of thought and expression, due process of law and equal protection of the law; it documents and denounces murders, disappearances, torture, arbitrary imprisonment, exile, censorship and other abuses of internationally recognized human rights. -
POPORULUI Lmnineazâ-Fe
Lmnineazâ-fe ţfi vei fi! — Voest« şi vei putea! POPORULUI o. A. Лшшсгт 1 1K1UA NICOLAE ІОКСІА 6. A» CL Uli. ,4-Klíí. 75 ГЛІ^ Prim-weacwr: H BEUACŢIA : STHIDA ЛІСОІЬАК IuRttA Urni в. B 4 | •« S II11mîliai'U *> 4піУІі<і# IQ^M I Ai»SII*lSlbA 11\ : ft TELEFON No. 15-75. Apare In flecare Dumineci Avram Iancu şi I¥. Bălcescu Avram Iancu şi M. SL Regele Ferdinand Dosarele trecutului Aceste două figuri luminoa Alba-Iulia, ducea scrisoarea ur Acolo nade simţirea naţionale delà 1848, Am petrecut şi eu îu vara aceasta unei vieţi de sat din Ardealul anilor se ale istoriei noastre au ajuns, mătoare lui Kossuth: romanească vibrează în Ardeal, omul pro câteva zile la o baie modestă din revoluţiei Iui Iancu. bi toiul evenimentelor măreţ* „Văzând propunerile de pace, puternic şi se mani videnţial care a Ardeal. Baie cunoscută şi pe vremea Acum în preajma marilor serbări festă cu emoţia ce trecut la fapte pe din anul 1849 să stea alături. pe cari ni le-a adus d-1 Băl Romanilor vechi, dar mai puţin cu de prăznuire a memoriei lui Iancu, am numai îu moment? le I ' calea armelor şi prin noscută acum în vremea Românilor cetit cu deosebit interes paginile preo Inflăcăratul naţionalist de peste cescu, agentul emigraţiei româ ne din partea guvernului un hotăiîtoare din viaţa 1 el, poporul român — noui. Aci puţina lume^ce se adună, tului de sub poala munţilor lui Iancu, Carpaţi după-ce a luptat cu to gar, trebue să ne exprimăm pă* паеі naţiuni le pot I deşi de puţină înde- de dragul isvoarelor rermale, cu un şi nu fără mulţămire. -
STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS MOLDAVIAE, 2018, Nr.10(120) Seria “{Tiin\E Umanistice” ISSN 1811-2668 ISSN Online 2345-1009 P.76-82
STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS MOLDAVIAE, 2018, nr.10(120) Seria “{tiin\e umanistice” ISSN 1811-2668 ISSN online 2345-1009 p.76-82 CZU: 94(498) „1848/1849” RĂZBOAIELE UITATE ALE ROMÂNILOR LA 1848-1849 Ela COSMA Institutul de Istorie „George Barițiu” al Academiei Române din Cluj-Napoca Istoriografia română a considerat în mod tradițional că revoluțiile de la 1848 din Țările Române (ca teritorii cuprinse în cadrul și în afara hotarelor României de astăzi) se reflectă cel mai bine prin programele create de revoluționarii transilvăneni, moldoveni și munteni. Dacă istoriografia rusă neagă însăși existența unei revoluții pașoptiste românești, istoriografia maghiară o consideră o contrarevoluție. Între timp, insistând asupra evidentei unități programatice a revolu- țiilor de la 1848 în toate teritoriile românești (dar uitând constant să abordeze „pete albe”, precum Basarabia, Bucovina, Banatul Sârbesc), istoriografia noastră nu a acordat aproape deloc atenție altor aspecte importante. Astfel, componenta militară a revoluțiilor românești de la 1848-1849, în general neglijată de istorici, este prezentată în studiul de față. Acesta abordează operațiunile militare românești desfășurate în cursul anilor pașoptiști în Țările Române, de la bătălii singulare la războiul clasic, de la acțiuni de înarmare populară și de instrucție în tabere militare la lupte de gherilă în munți. În Transilvania, așa-numitul „război civil” româno-ungar a fost, de fapt, un război în toată regula, definit de curând ca fiind un război național de apărare purtat de românii ardeleni. Sunt evidențiate episoade belice mai puțin cunoscute din Valahia Mare și Valahia Mică (Oltenia), precum și rezistența armată din Moldova și tabăra militară de la Grozești (azi Oituz), în Carpații de Curbură.