INT Montecitorio 1 23 ING:Via Montecitorio

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

INT Montecitorio 1 23 ING:Via Montecitorio A DAY AT MONTECITORIO Camera dei deputati Dear Guests, Welcome to Palazzo Montecitorio. Today you will be visiting a very special build- A democracy is nourished by its past and by its present, but most of all by its fu- ing: the seat of the Chamber of Deputies, one of the most important venues of ture. Your presence here is a sign of attachment to democratic values and it is al- Italian democracy. This is where the laws that govern the life of our society are pro- so through a better knowledge of the workings of parliamentary institutions that duced. Each law is the result of the exchange of opinions between the women and one can prepare for tomorrow’s democracy. men chosen by the people every five years as their representatives in Parliament. Palazzo Montecitorio is a solemn, but also an open, free and fascinating place. I hope that it will arouse your curiosity and interest as well. This place belongs to the history of Italy and its democracy. It is important to un- derstand how it works. I am sure that you will be impressed and surprised by many features and that this will allow you to make useful comparisons with your own parliamentary institutions and help you to gain a more comprehensive understanding of our country. Gianfranco Fini The heart of the building is the Plenary Hall, which is where the sessions involving The President of the Chamber of Deputies all the Deputies are held. The Deputies’ benches are arranged in the form of a hemicycle. This place is especially evocative because it represents one of the his- toric symbols of the politics of our country. But the visit does not end there, be- cause Montecitorio contains many other meeting venues, where the preparatory work is conducted. The Chamber of Deputies performs a broad and complex range of activities, which is not limited to producing laws, but also includes debating and voting on confi- dence for governments, addressing parliamentary questions and all the other busi- ness which is part and parcel of the workings of a representative assembly in a modern democracy. An important role in this activity is also carried out by Parlia- mentary Committees and you will be able to read something about the way they work in practice. The building is also of great historical and cultural value, not only because of its architecture and the works of art it houses, but also because it bears witness to the past history of our country and the passions and ideas that have marked it in recent and earlier decades. The halls and corridors of Montecitorio witnessed crucial moments in our nation- al history as well as dramatic events that have left their mark on our country. These memories remind us of the way Italy’s representative institutions have developed through history and the process through which they have become a central part of the nation’s life. PARLIAMENT INTRODUCES ITSELF First things first The Houses: basics PARLIAMENT The Italian Constitution, which is the basis of the Italian State, The Chamber of Deputies meets in Rome at Palazzo Mon- ARLIAMENT P establishes that sovereignty is vested in the people, meaning tecitorio. Members of the Chamber are elected for 5 years all citizens, who exercise it according to the forms and within unless Parliament is dissolved before the end of its term (the the bounds laid down by the Constitution itself. One of the same applies to Members of the Senate). There are 630 most important ways in which the people’s sovereignty is Deputies, elected by citizens who are 18 and over. To be eli- expressed is the election of Parliament, where all Italian cit- gible for election, the minimum age is 25. A day at Montecitorio izens are represented. The Senate also meets in Rome, at Palazzo Madama. 315 Senators are elected by citizens who are 25 A job for two or over. To be eligible for election, Senators must ZOOM The Italian Parliament is made up of two Houses: the be at least 40. There are also a few Senators As of 2006, 12 Deputies Chamber of Deputies and the Senate of the Republic. who are not elected but who have been appointed and 6 Senators are The system they operate in is termed “perfect bicameralism”, Senators for Life. They are former Presidents of elected by Italian citizens because the two Chambers have equal powers and identical the Republic or citizens of outstanding merit in who are resident abroad. tasks, although they differ in the number of members they have the social, scientific, artistic or literary fields. and in the mechanism by which their members are elected. elects 2/3Higher Council chaired byPresident of appoints Judiciary of the Judiciary the Republic can dissolve appoints 1/3 elects 1/3 elects elects 1/3 votes confidence Constitutional Court elects 1/3 Parliament Government elect Parliament A view of the Plenary Hall and the powers People of the Chamber of Deputies, designed by Ernesto Basile. of the State 4 5 WHAT PARLIAMENT DOES Democracy lives here Parliament is the very symbol of democracy, the place where those who have been chosen by citizens through free elec- tions engage in debate to settle the country’s problems. The Italian Parliament thus serves an essential function in the political management of the State. Its main tasks are to enact laws and to provide guidance and exercise scrutiny over Government action. The legislative function Bills can be introduced by individual Members, by the Gov- ernment or by other entities which are recognized as hav- ing the power of legislative initiative under the Consti- tution (Regional Councils and CNEL – the National Coun- cil for Economy and Labour). Citizens can also introduce bills as long as they are signed by at least 50,000 electors. The legislative function is exercised collectively by both Hous- es. This means that bills become laws only if they have been passed by both Houses. The Chamber of Deputies can generally approve a law by a majority of Members present on the Floor of the House, as long as one half of all Mem- bers plus one are present. On Wednesdays, with direct TV coverage, question time is held, when the Government Views of exterior and façade provides immediate answers of Palazzo Montecitorio. to questions from Deputies. 6 7 WHAT PARLIAMENT DOES Confidence and No Confidence PARLIAMENT Parliament has a function of guidance with regard to Government which is first and foremost exercised through the instrument of political confidence. Before beginning its activity, every Government needs to secure the confi- dence of Parliament, which decides whether to grant it or not by voting on a confidence motion. A day at Montecitorio Confidence must be granted by both Houses. This is a par- ticularly important moment in the political life of the coun- The velarium covering try. For this reason, the vote is conducted in a particularly the Plenary Hall of the Chamber of Deputies, solemn manner with the Members of Parliament pro- an Art Nouveau work nouncing an aye or a nay vote as they proceed one by one by Giovanni Beltrami. before the President’s bench. If it fails to secure the confi- dence of Parliament, the Government must resign. Parliamentary Committees and which possess the same pow- If the Houses fail to express a majority which can support ers and are subject to the same constraints as the judiciary. a Government, the President of the Republic can dissolve them before the end of their term and call new elec- Amendments to the Constitution tions. Deputies and Senators can at any time propose a Amendments to the Constitution are so sensitive and im- no-confidence vote in the Government. The no-confi- portant, in view of the consequences they may have on the dence vote must be signed by at least a tenth of the Mem- very structure of democracy, that Parliament can decide on bers of one of the two Houses. them only through procedures which guarantee the broad- est possible support. They are therefore required Scrutiny over Government to be approved – in the same text – twice by In order to exercise its function of scrutiny over Govern- each House. An interval of at least three months ZOOM ment, Parliament has a number of instruments available to it: must elapse between the first and second approval, Every seven years, the • Questions are written requests for information addressed and the second approval requires, as a minimum, two Houses of Parliament to the Government on the part of Members of Parliament that an absolute majority of Deputies and Sen- meet in joint session to elect the President of the in order to seek information on specific facts and the in- ators vote in favour. It is also possible to submit Republic. In addition to tended action in response thereto. amendments to a referendum if at least 500,000 Members of Parliament, • Interpellations are written questions seeking clarifica- electors or a fifth of the Members of a House or three delegates from each Region (Valle tion on the reasons for Government policy. five Regional Councils request one. A referendum d’Aosta only has one) One of the powers vested in Parliament is its right to con- cannot however be sought if the second approval also take part in the duct investigations into issues of public interest, by estab- of the amendment received a two-thirds majority vote. lishing Inquiry Committees, which can also be bicameral in both Houses. 8 9 THE HISTORY OF THE ITALIAN PARLIAMENT Before the establishment of the Italian Parliament United Italy PARLIAMENT The forerunner of the Italian Parliament was the one es- On 14 March 1861, after the unification of the country, tablished by King Charles Albert in 1848 with the Statu- the first Italian Parliament proclaimed the birth of the King- to Albertino or Albertine Statute.
Recommended publications
  • Vom Abstellgleis Zur Nebenregierung1
    05_Hornig Seite 454 Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007 9:06 09 Eike-Christian Hornig »Camera obscura« – Der italienische Senat und seine Mitglieder auf Lebenszeit: Vom Abstellgleis zur Nebenregierung1 Das italienische Parlament gilt im internationalen Vergleich als eine Besonderheit, da es mit dem Abgeordnetenhaus und dem Senat über zwei gleichberechtigte und direkt gewählte Kammern verfügt. Dieser »bicameralismo perfetto« ist seit den Umbrüchen der 1990er Jahre verstärkt in das Fadenkreuz institutioneller Reformen gerückt, da er als Quelle der Instabilität der Regierungen schnell auszumachen war. Da aber eine Kopplung des Senats an eine Dezentralisierung bzw. Föderalisierung Italiens bislang ausblieb, ist der Senat nach wie vor der »machtvolle Zwillingsbruder der Abgeordnetenkammer«2. Seit der Parlamentswahl im April 2006 steht er beson- ders im Mittelpunkt der Aufmerksamkeit, da die Regierung Prodi hier nur über eine hauchdünne Mehrheit verfügt. Bei einer symbolträchtigen Abstimmung über die Außenpolitik im Februar 2007 kam diese Mehrheit nicht zu Stande und stürzte die Regierung in die Krise. Dafür ausschlaggebend waren, neben der Abwesenheit zweier kommunistischer Senatoren der Regierungskoalition, auch zwei Senatoren auf Lebenszeit (SaL). Insbesondere der Pate der italienischen Politik, der mehrfache Ministerpräsident Giulio Andreotti sorgte mit einem kurzfristigen Stimmungs- wechsel für Kritik an der Rolle der Senatoren auf Lebenszeit als Zünglein an der Waage3. Diese war zuvor schon im Dezember 2006 laut geworden, da der Haushalt der Regierung nur Dank der massiven Unterstützung der Senatoren auf Lebenszeit verabschiedet werden konnte, was Oppositionspolitiker wie der Vorsitzende der Oppositionspartei »Alleanza Nazionale«, Gianfranco Fini als undemokratisch kri- tisierten4. 1 Für ihre Hinweise danke ich Ralf Kleinfeld, Anna Lena Etzbach und David Grewe. 2 Jörg Seisselberg, »Der italienische Senat: Machtvoller Zwillingsbruder der Abgeordne- tenkammer«, in: Gisela Riescher / Sabine Ruß / Christoph Haas (Hg.), Zweite Kam- mern, München 2000, S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Populism in Europe Can Be Traced Through Online Behaviour...”
    “The rise of populism in Europe can be traced through online behaviour...” THE NEW FACE OF DIGITAL POPULISM Jamie Bartlett Jonathan Birdwell Mark Littler Demos is a think-tank focused on power and politics. Our unique approach challenges the traditional, 'ivory tower' model of policymaking by giving a voice to people and communities. We work together with the groups and individuals who are the focus of our research, including them in citizens’ juries, deliberative workshops, focus groups and ethnographic research. Through our high quality and socially responsible research, Demos has established itself as the leading independent think-tank in British politics. In 2011, our work is focused on five programmes: Family and Society; Public Services and Welfare; Violence and Extremism; Public Interest and Political Economy. We also have two political research programmes: the Progressive Conservatism Project and Open Left, investigating the future of the centre-Right and centre-Left. Our work is driven by the goal of a society populated by free, capable, secure and powerful citizens. Find out more at www.demos.co.uk. THE NEW FACE OF DIGITAL POPULISM Jamie Bartlett Jonathan Birdwell Mark Littler First published in 2011 © Demos. Some rights reserved Magdalen House, 136 Tooley Street London, SE1 2TU, UK ISBN 978-1-906693-86-2 Copy edited by Susannah Wight Series design by modernactivity Typeset by modernactivity Set in Gotham Rounded and Baskerville 10 Open access. Some rights reserved. As the publisher of this work, Demos wants to encourage the circulation of our work as widely as possible while retaining the copyright. We therefore have an open access policy which enables anyone to access our content online without charge.
    [Show full text]
  • El MSI Y El Lugar Del Fascismo En La Cultura Política Italiana = the Msi and the Role of Fascism in Italian Political Culture
    El msi y El luGar DEl Fascismo En la cultura Política italiana The msi and the role of fascism in Italian political culture Ferran GallEGo Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona Fecha de recepción: 17 de febrero; revisión: 17 de mayo; aceptación definitiva: 23 de octubre rEsumEn: En este trabajo se analiza el papel del movimiento social italiano en la política del país transalpino del siglo xx. la clave de su influencia estaría en las peculiaridades del régimen político surgido de las ruinas del fascismo. con la proclamación de la república muchos fascistas se enrolaron en las filas de la Democracia cristiana y otros partidos de la derecha, dejando al msi como único heredero del fascismo. Eso no le impidió colaborar con la Democracia cristiana a través de la estrategia del «inserimento». cuando la Democracia cristiana empezó su aproximación al Partido socialista italiano, el msi se vio claramente excluido y situado en una posición relativamente marginal. su resurgimiento estará relacio- nado con los cambios radicales ocurridos en la política italiana en las décadas de los sesenta y setenta que propiciaran la llegada al liderazgo de Giorgio almirante en 1969. El msi se presentará como un partido restaurador del orden y dispuesto a combatir por sí mismo la subversión. Durante los años 80 el msi se moverá entre la estrategia del Partido-Protesta de almirante y la idea de un partido de la sociedad civil defendido por rauti. al final, el msi, tras el cambio de liderazgo de almirante por Gianfranco Fini, inició un nuevo camino donde se afirmaba la lealtad a los valores del fascismo, corroborado por la crisis del comunismo.
    [Show full text]
  • October 22, 1962 Amintore Fanfani Diaries (Excepts)
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified October 22, 1962 Amintore Fanfani Diaries (excepts) Citation: “Amintore Fanfani Diaries (excepts),” October 22, 1962, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Italian Senate Historical Archives [the Archivio Storico del Senato della Repubblica]. Translated by Leopoldo Nuti. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/115421 Summary: The few excerpts about Cuba are a good example of the importance of the diaries: not only do they make clear Fanfani’s sense of danger and his willingness to search for a peaceful solution of the crisis, but the bits about his exchanges with Vice-Minister of Foreign Affairs Carlo Russo, with the Italian Ambassador in London Pietro Quaroni, or with the USSR Presidium member Frol Kozlov, help frame the Italian position during the crisis in a broader context. Credits: This document was made possible with support from the Leon Levy Foundation. Original Language: Italian Contents: English Translation The Amintore Fanfani Diaries 22 October Tonight at 20:45 [US Ambassador Frederick Reinhardt] delivers me a letter in which [US President] Kennedy announces that he must act with an embargo of strategic weapons against Cuba because he is threatened by missile bases. And he sends me two of the four parts of the speech which he will deliver at midnight [Rome time; 7 pm Washington time]. I reply to the ambassador wondering whether they may be falling into a trap which will have possible repercussions in Berlin and elsewhere. Nonetheless, caught by surprise, I decide to reply formally tomorrow. I immediately called [President of the Republic Antonio] Segni in Sassari and [Foreign Minister Attilio] Piccioni in Brussels recommending prudence and peace for tomorrow’s EEC [European Economic Community] meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaderni D'italianistica : Revue Officielle De La Société Canadienne
    ANGELO PRINCIPE CENTRING THE PERIPHERY. PRELIMINARY NOTES ON THE ITALLVN CANADL\N PRESS: 1950-1990 The Radical Press From the end of the Second World War to the 1980s, eleven Italian Canadian radical periodicals were published: seven left-wing and four right- wing, all but one in Toronto.' The left-wing publications were: II lavoratore (the Worker), La parola (the Word), La carota (the Carrot), Forze nuove (New Forces), Avanti! Canada (Forward! Canada), Lotta unitaria (United Struggle), and Nuovo mondo (New World). The right-wing newspapers were: Rivolta ideale (Ideal Revolt), Tradizione (Tradition), // faro (the Lighthouse or Beacon), and Occidente (the West or Western civilization). Reading these newspapers today, one gets the impression that they were written in a remote era. The socio-political reality that generated these publications has been radically altered on both sides of the ocean. As a con- sequence of the recent disintegration of the communist system, which ended over seventy years of East/West confrontational tension, in Italy the party system to which these newspapers refer no longer exists. Parties bear- ing new names and advancing new policies have replaced the older ones, marking what is now considered the passage from the first to the second Republic- As a result, the articles on, or about, Italian politics published ^ I would like to thank several people who helped in different ways with this paper. Namely: Nivo Angelone, Roberto Bandiera, Damiano Berlingieri, Domenico Capotorto, Mario Ciccoritti, Elio Costa, Celestino De luliis, Odoardo Di Santo, Franca lacovetta, Teresa Manduca, Severino Martelluzzi, Roberto Perin, Concetta V. Principe, Guido Pugliese, Olga Zorzi Pugliese, and Gabriele Scardellato.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Parliamentary Delegation
    The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia Australian Parliamentary Delegation to the Russian Federation and the Italian Republic 17 April – 1 May 2005 REPORT June 2005 ii © Commonwealth of Australia 2005 ISBN 0 642 71532 7 This document was printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Department of the Senate, Parliament House, Canberra. iii MEMBERS OF THE DELEGATION Leader Senator the Hon. Paul Calvert President of the Senate Senator for Tasmania Liberal Party of Australia Deputy Leader Ms Jill Hall, MP Member for Shortland (NSW) Australian Labor Party Members Senator Jacinta Collins Senator for Victoria Australian Labor Party Mrs Kay Elson, MP Member for Forde (QLD) Liberal Party of Australia Senator Jeannie Ferris Senator for South Australia Liberal Party of Australia The Hon. Jackie Kelly, MP Member for Lindsay (NSW) Liberal Party of Australia Senator Ross Lightfoot Senator for Western Australia Liberal Party of Australia Delegation secretary Mr John Vander Wyk Department of the Senate Private Secretary to the Mr Don Morris President of the Senate iv The delegation with the Archimandrite of the Holy Trinity-St Sergius Lavra monastery at Sergiev Posad, Father Savva. From left, the Deputy Head of Mission and Counsellor at the Australian Embassy, Mr Alex Brooking, Senator Jacinta Collins, Mrs Kay Elson, MP, Senator the Hon. Paul Calvert (Delegation Leader), Father Savva, Senator Ross Lightfoot, Senator Jeannie Ferris, the Hon. Jackie Kelly, MP, and Mrs Jill Hall (Deputy Leader). v TABLE OF CONTENTS MEMBERS OF THE DELEGATION iii PREFACE
    [Show full text]
  • Italy's Atlanticism Between Foreign and Internal
    UNISCI Discussion Papers, Nº 25 (January / Enero 2011) ISSN 1696-2206 ITALY’S ATLANTICISM BETWEEN FOREIGN AND INTERNAL POLITICS Massimo de Leonardis 1 Catholic University of the Sacred Heart Abstract: In spite of being a defeated country in the Second World War, Italy was a founding member of the Atlantic Alliance, because the USA highly valued her strategic importance and wished to assure her political stability. After 1955, Italy tried to advocate the Alliance’s role in the Near East and in Mediterranean Africa. The Suez crisis offered Italy the opportunity to forge closer ties with Washington at the same time appearing progressive and friendly to the Arabs in the Mediterranean, where she tried to be a protagonist vis a vis the so called neo- Atlanticism. This link with Washington was also instrumental to neutralize General De Gaulle’s ambitions of an Anglo-French-American directorate. The main issues of Italy’s Atlantic policy in the first years of “centre-left” coalitions, between 1962 and 1968, were the removal of the Jupiter missiles from Italy as a result of the Cuban missile crisis, French policy towards NATO and the EEC, Multilateral [nuclear] Force [MLF] and the revision of the Alliance’ strategy from “massive retaliation” to “flexible response”. On all these issues the Italian government was consonant with the United States. After the period of the late Sixties and Seventies when political instability, terrorism and high inflation undermined the Italian role in international relations, the decision in 1979 to accept the Euromissiles was a landmark in the history of Italian participation to NATO.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Final MASTERS THESIS
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Carlo Fontana and the Origins of the Architectural Monograph A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Art History by Juliann Rose Walker June 2016 Thesis Committee: Dr. Kristoffer Neville, Chairperson Dr. Jeanette Kohl Dr. Conrad Rudolph Copyright by Juliann Walker 2016 The Thesis of Juliann Rose Walker is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements I would first like to start by thanking my committee members. Thank you to my advisor, Kristoffer Neville, who has worked with me for almost four years now as both an undergrad and graduate student; this project was possible because of you. To Jeanette Kohl, who was integral in helping me to outline and finish my first chapter, which made the rest of my thesis writing much easier in comparison. Your constructive comments were instrumental to the clarity and depth of my research, so thank you. And thank you to Conrad Rudolph, for your stern, yet fair, critiques of my writing, which were an invaluable reminder that you can never proofread enough. A special thank you to Malcolm Baker, who offered so much of his time and energy to me in my undergraduate career, and for being a valuable and vast resource of knowledge on early modern European artwork as I researched possible thesis topics. And the warmest of thanks to Alesha Jeanette, who has always left her door open for me to come and talk about anything that was on my mind. I would also like to thank Leigh Gleason at the California Museum of Photography, for giving me the opportunity to intern in collections.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Lega Nord
    TILBURG UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO MSc Sociology An integrated and dynamic approach to the life cycle of populist radical right parties: the case of Lega Nord Supervisors: Dr Koen Abts Prof. Mario Diani Candidate: Alessandra Lo Piccolo 2017/2018 1 Abstract: This work aims at explaining populist radical right parties’ (PRRPs) electoral success and failure over their life-cycle by developing a dynamic and integrated approach to the study of their supply-side. For this purpose, the study of PRRPs is integrated building on concepts elaborated in the field of contentious politics: the political opportunity structure, the mobilizing structure and the framing processes. This work combines these perspectives in order to explain the fluctuating electoral fortune of the Italian Lega Nord at the national level (LN), here considered as a prototypical example of PRRPs. After the first participation in a national government (1994) and its peak in the general election of 1996 (10.1%), the LN electoral performances have been characterised by constant fluctuations. However, the party has managed to survive throughout different phases of the recent Italian political history. Scholars have often explained the party’s electoral success referring to its folkloristic appeal, its regionalist and populist discourses as well as the strong leadership of Umberto Bossi. However, most contributions adopt a static and one-sided analysis of the party performances, without integrating the interplay between political opportunities, organisational resources and framing strategies in a dynamic way. On the contrary, this work focuses on the interplay of exogenous and endogenous factors in accounting for the fluctuating electoral results of the party over three phases: regionalist phase (1990-1995), the move to the right (1998-2003) and the new nationalist period (2012-2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Quando Pivetti Sloggiò Sironi. “
    Quando Pivetti sloggiò Sironi. “Discriminazione erotica e non politica” L’intrigante racconto che qui ha fatto Franco Miracco sul restauro del grande affresco (“L’Italia tra le arti e le scienze”) di Mario Sironi mi ha fatto tornare alla mente un episodio di cui fu vittima non solo il grande pittore che fu tra gli iniziatori del movimento artistico del Novecento ma, con lui, tutte o quasi le grandi firme dell’arte del secolo breve. Tutto accadde improvvisamente, all’indomani di quel 15 aprile 1994 quando, per uno di quei paradossi del contrappasso, la presidenza della camera, dopo appena due anni (causa scioglimento anticipato della legislatura) era passata da Giorgio Napolitano a Irene Pivetti, ventinove anni, prima legislatura, leghista. Berlusconi aveva vinto le elezioni grazie anche ai voti leghisti e restituì la cortesia con uno spropositato regalo a Bossi che al più alto scranno di Montecitorio piazzò la sua figlioccia-rivelazione. Che si tradusse in un torto alla camera: forse neppure quei due immaginavano che la terza carica dello Stato sarebbe finita nelle mani di una matricola integrista, austera nei suoi tailleurini che lasciavano scoperta solo quella parte del collo sul quale doveva brillare sempre la croce di Lorena. Ma, quel che più conta, una ragazza del tutto ignara dei meccanismi, delle regole, persino del bon ton parlamentare: poco male, l’importante era che sul ponte di comando ci fosse un garante leghista dei desiderata del Cavaliere. Di lei come presidente le cronache non registrano atti politici di un qualche rilievo
    [Show full text]
  • Il Parlamento E L'evoluzione Degli Strumenti Della Legislazione
    Tavola rotonda su IL PARLAMENTO E L’EVOLUZIONE DEGLI STRUMENTI DELLA LEGISLAZIONE promossa dal Comitato per la legislazione in conclusione del secondo ciclo di Presidenza 12 gennaio 2010 Sala della Lupa Camera dei deputati Roma La tavola rotonda, promossa dal Comitato per la legislazione a conclusione del secondo ciclo di presidenza, riunisce personalità politiche che rivestono, o hanno rivestito, diverse posizioni di responsabilità nello svolgimento del processo legislativo. La tavola rotonda pone al centro della riflessione il ruolo fondamentale del Presidente di Assemblea, nell’esperienza dei presidenti della Camera dei deputati che si sono succeduti nelle ultime quattro legislature e che hanno tutti dovuto far fronte a rilevanti difficoltà nel procedimento legislativo. Nelle stesse quattro legislature il Comitato per la legislazione, istituito nel gennaio 1998, ha operato a supporto di tale impegnativa funzione presidenziale, svolgendo i suoi compiti di vigilanza sulla qualità dei testi legislativi, con particolare riferimento alle forme prevalenti di legislazione (deleghe e decreti legge). Presso entrambe le Camere, le Commissioni Affari costituzionali svolgono anch’esse un delicato ruolo di controllo con riferimento agli aspetti di costituzionalità, che investe non solo i contenuti ma anche le procedure e il sistema delle competenze. Inoltre, le due Commissioni sono al centro dei processi di riforma costituzionale. Sul versante governativo, il Ministro per i rapporti con il Parlamento svolge un ruolo altrettanto complesso nel misurarsi con le difficoltà del processo legislativo collegando un doppio fronte: l’insieme dei rapporti interni al Governo e quello con i diversi organi parlamentari in entrambe le Camere. Come base della discussione si offrono le analisi delle tendenze della legislazione elaborate di recente nell’ambito del Comitato: la “nota di sintesi” del Rapporto sulla legislazione 2009, edito dalla Camera dei deputati, e “Tendenze e problemi della decretazione d’urgenza”, presentato al Comitato per la legislazione il 12 novembre 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • English Version of This Report Is the Only Official Document
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 4 March 2018 ODIHR Election Assessment Mission Final Report Warsaw 6 June 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 II. INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................... 3 III. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................... 3 IV. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................. 4 V. ELECTORAL SYSTEM .............................................................................................................. 5 VI. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION .............................................................................................. 6 VII. VOTER REGISTRATION .......................................................................................................... 8 VIII. CANDIDATE REGISTRATION ................................................................................................ 9 IX. ELECTION CAMPAIGN .......................................................................................................... 11 X. CAMPAIGN FINANCE............................................................................................................. 12 XI. MEDIA .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]