Rome in Bernini's Footsteps
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Antikenrezeption Im Hochbarock
Antikenrezeption im Hochbarock Herausgegeben van Herbert Beck und Sabine Schulze GEBR. MANN VERLAG· BERLIN lRVTNG LAVIN Bernini and Antiquity - The Baroque Paradox A Poetical View* My chief purpose in this paper is to bring together and consider under one heading two papers by earlier scholars on apparently quite different subjects that are fundamcntnl to some of our current views on the relationship of Baroque art to antiquity. In a brief note entitled ··Rhetoric and Baroque Art". published in 1955 . Giulio Carlo Argan for the first time offered what has since become perhaps the prevalent interpretation of Ba roque art. base d on the classical tradition of rhetoric'. The primary source book on the subject. Arist0tle's treatise on rhetoric. became available in Italian translation in 1570. The wide influence of Argan ·s essay was very salubrious. suggesting as it did that Baroque style. often regarded as a decadent superabundance of ornament and conceit. could better be under stood positively as a deliberate and sophisticated technique of persuasion. T he second paper. published by RudolfWiukower in 1963, compared the use ofanciem models by Poussin. the arch classicist of France. and Bernini, the outstanding representative of Italian Baroque 2 exuberance . With great perspicuity Wittkower showed from preparatory studies how classical sources functioned in diametrically opposite ways in the development of their works. Poussin would typicall y start with a dynamic. ··Baroque" design. into which ancient models would then intervene to produce a restrained. classicizing final version: Bernini. on the other hand. would often start with a classical prototype. which he would then transform into a free and volatile ·'Baroque'· solution. -
1-Day Rome City Guide a Preplanned Step-By-Step Time Line and City Guide for Rome
1 day 1-day Rome City Guide A preplanned step-by-step time line and city guide for Rome. Follow it and get the best of the city. 1-day Rome City Guide 2 © PromptGuides.com 1-day Rome City Guide Overview of Day 1 LEAVE HOTEL Tested and recommended hotels in Rome > Take Metro Line A to Ottaviano San Pietro station 09:00-10:10 St. Peter's Basilica Largest Christian Page 5 church in the world 10:10-10:40 Piazza di San Pietro One of the best known Page 5 squares in the world Take Metro Line A from Ottaviano San Pietro station to Termini station (Direction: Anagnina) Change to Metro Line B from Termini station to Colosseo station (Direction: Laurentina) - 30’ in all 11:10-12:40 Colosseum Iconic symbol of Page 6 Imperial Rome Take a walk to Arch of Constantine - 5’ 12:45-12:55 Arch of Constantine Majestic monument Page 6 Lunch time Take a walk to Piazza Venezia 14:30-14:50 Piazza Venezia Focal point of modern Page 7 Rome Take a walk to the Pantheon - 15’ 15:05-15:35 Pantheon The world's largest Page 7 unreinforced concrete Take a walk to Piazza Navona - 10’ dome 15:45-16:15 Piazza Navona One of the most Page 7 beautiful squares in Take a walk to Trevi Fountain - 25’ Rome 16:40-17:10 Trevi Fountain One of the most familiar Page 8 sights of Rome Take a walk to Spanish Steps - 20’ 17:30-18:00 Spanish Steps Rome's most beloved Page 8 Rococo monument END OF DAY 1 © PromptGuides.com 3 1-day Rome City Guide Overview of Day 1 4 © PromptGuides.com 1-day Rome City Guide Attraction Details 09:00-10:10 St. -
A Political Interpretation of a Proscenium Arch Designed by Francesco Romanelli for the Opera “San Bonifazio” (1638) Leila Zammar
ISSN 2421-2679 146 A political interpretation of a proscenium arch designed by Francesco Romanelli for the opera “San Bonifazio” (1638) Leila Zammar description might ft in part to the character as some of its attributes are usually associated to the personifcation of Justice, I will propose another ome years ago, while I was looking for reading, which better matches the programmatic information about the artists who were meaning the Barberini family wanted to convey hired by the Barberini to stage their operas with the opera San Bonifazio for which his arch Sin Rome for the Carnival season 1638, I found was very likely designed. Romanelli was in fact an interesting drawing by the painter Giovanni one of the artists chosen by the noble family to Francesco Romanelli (c.1610-1662). Te drawing, design works of art that could be a good means held in the Metropolitan Museum of New York, of conveying their political propaganda (about shows an incomplete proscenium arch of a stage the role of Francesco Romanelli see Oy-Marra with the crest of the Barberini placed at the centre 2007: 303-16). of the architrave. Born in Viterbo, Romanelli, also known as Il Viterbese, from his birth city, or Il Rafaellino, afer Rafaello, was trained in Rome where he studied with Il Domenichino (Domenico Zampieri, 1581-1641) frst, and then with Pietro da Cortona (Pietro Berettini, 1596-1669). It is probable that the latter introduced him to the court of the Barberini family since Romanelli was his collaborator in painting the frescos for the chapel inside Palazzo Barberini (1631-32). -
Patrocinium of Calasanz
The Patrocinium of St. Joseph Calasanz November 27 Although the Feast of St. Joseph Calasanz is celebrated on August 25, this date often falls at the end of summer vacation for most Piarist Schools. As a result, the religious order has designated November 27, which is the day he opened Europe’s first free public school, as the Patrocinium, a special day to honor and celebrate St. Joseph Calasanz. Joseph was born on September 11, 1557 in a tiny village called Peralta de la Sal. He was a Spanish priest from Aragon, Spain, who went to Rome at the end of the sixteenth century and started schools for poor and homeless children. He also started a religious congregation to serve these schools which is today spread throughout the world. He was well educated in philosophy, law and theology at the Spanish universities of Estadilla, Lerida, and Valencia. His family initially did not support his religious calling. His father wanted him to marry and to continue the family, but after recovering from an illness which brought him close to death, Calasanz was ordained as a priest on December 17, 1583. He subsequently became vicar general of Tremp. He later relinquished much of his inheritance and resigned his vicariate. For the next ten years, he held various posts as a secretary, administrator and theologian in the Diocese of Albarracín in Spain. In 1592, Joseph went to Rome, where he became a theologian in the service of Cardinal Marcoantonio Colonna and a tutor to his nephew. He worked alongside St. Camillus de Lellis during the plague, which hit Rome at the time. -
Australian Parliamentary Delegation
The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia Australian Parliamentary Delegation to the Russian Federation and the Italian Republic 17 April – 1 May 2005 REPORT June 2005 ii © Commonwealth of Australia 2005 ISBN 0 642 71532 7 This document was printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Department of the Senate, Parliament House, Canberra. iii MEMBERS OF THE DELEGATION Leader Senator the Hon. Paul Calvert President of the Senate Senator for Tasmania Liberal Party of Australia Deputy Leader Ms Jill Hall, MP Member for Shortland (NSW) Australian Labor Party Members Senator Jacinta Collins Senator for Victoria Australian Labor Party Mrs Kay Elson, MP Member for Forde (QLD) Liberal Party of Australia Senator Jeannie Ferris Senator for South Australia Liberal Party of Australia The Hon. Jackie Kelly, MP Member for Lindsay (NSW) Liberal Party of Australia Senator Ross Lightfoot Senator for Western Australia Liberal Party of Australia Delegation secretary Mr John Vander Wyk Department of the Senate Private Secretary to the Mr Don Morris President of the Senate iv The delegation with the Archimandrite of the Holy Trinity-St Sergius Lavra monastery at Sergiev Posad, Father Savva. From left, the Deputy Head of Mission and Counsellor at the Australian Embassy, Mr Alex Brooking, Senator Jacinta Collins, Mrs Kay Elson, MP, Senator the Hon. Paul Calvert (Delegation Leader), Father Savva, Senator Ross Lightfoot, Senator Jeannie Ferris, the Hon. Jackie Kelly, MP, and Mrs Jill Hall (Deputy Leader). v TABLE OF CONTENTS MEMBERS OF THE DELEGATION iii PREFACE -
The Role of Prints in the Bernini's Anima Beata and Anima Damnata
Originalveröffentlichung in: Print quarterly, 33 (2016), Nr. 2, S. 135-146 The Role of Prints in the Artistic Genealogy of Bernini’s Anima beata and Anima damnata Eckhard Leuschner The two marble busts by Gianlorenzo Bernini resentations of the Quattuor Novissima from the late fif (1598-1680) known as the Blessed Soul (Anima Beata or teenth century including, among others, works by Salvata) and the Damned Soul (Anima Damnata) are today Hieronymus Bosch, Maerten van Heemskerck and in the Spanish Embassy to the Holy See in Rome (figs. Hendrick Goltzius.5 102 and 103). They feature prominendy in all mono Most art historians identify the patron of Bernini’s graphs on the artist.' In addition, they are discussed in Blessed Soul and Damned Soul as the Spanish cleric Pedro books and articles dealing with images related to the de Foix Montoya (1556-1630), in whose possession, ac so-called Quattuor Novissima (Four Last Things).2 cording to Irving Lavin, the two works might have been The genre of written meditations on the Quattuor No as early as 1619 when ‘dos medios cuerpos de piedra de vissima- Death, the Last Judgment, Hell, Heaven/Par- statuas’ (two half-length [!] bodies of stone, sculptures) adise or, in a later grouping, Death, Purgatory, Hell, were listed among his belongings.6 In 1632 the busts Heaven/Paradise - was inaugurated in the early fif were placed in the sacristy of S. Giacomo degli Spagnoli teenth century by Gerard van Vliederhoven’s Cor diale and have belonged to Spanish institutions in Rome ever quattuor novissimis, although Purgatory was still miss- since. -
Revised Final MASTERS THESIS
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Carlo Fontana and the Origins of the Architectural Monograph A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Art History by Juliann Rose Walker June 2016 Thesis Committee: Dr. Kristoffer Neville, Chairperson Dr. Jeanette Kohl Dr. Conrad Rudolph Copyright by Juliann Walker 2016 The Thesis of Juliann Rose Walker is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements I would first like to start by thanking my committee members. Thank you to my advisor, Kristoffer Neville, who has worked with me for almost four years now as both an undergrad and graduate student; this project was possible because of you. To Jeanette Kohl, who was integral in helping me to outline and finish my first chapter, which made the rest of my thesis writing much easier in comparison. Your constructive comments were instrumental to the clarity and depth of my research, so thank you. And thank you to Conrad Rudolph, for your stern, yet fair, critiques of my writing, which were an invaluable reminder that you can never proofread enough. A special thank you to Malcolm Baker, who offered so much of his time and energy to me in my undergraduate career, and for being a valuable and vast resource of knowledge on early modern European artwork as I researched possible thesis topics. And the warmest of thanks to Alesha Jeanette, who has always left her door open for me to come and talk about anything that was on my mind. I would also like to thank Leigh Gleason at the California Museum of Photography, for giving me the opportunity to intern in collections. -
Autograph Collection
http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8pv6ps6 No online items Autograph Collection Mario A Gallardo, Clay Stalls William H. Hannon Library Loyola Marymount University One LMU Drive, MS 8200 Los Angeles, CA 90045-8200 Phone: (310) 338-5710 Fax: (310) 338-5895 Email: [email protected] URL: http://library.lmu.edu/ © 2015 Loyola Marymount University. All rights reserved. Autograph Collection 007 1 Autograph Collection Collection number: 007 William H. Hannon Library Loyola Marymount University Los Angeles, California Processed by: Mario A Gallardo, Clay Stalls Date Completed: July 2015 Encoded by: Mario A Gallardo, Clay Stalls © 2015 Loyola Marymount University. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Autograph collection Dates: 1578-1959 Collection number: 007 Collector: Charlotte E. Field Collection Size: 4 autograph albums Repository: Loyola Marymount University. Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections. Los Angeles, California 90045-2659 Abstract: This collection consists of autographs of ecclesiastical figures, presidents, entertainers, and other personages, from the late sixteenth century to the mid twentieth century. Languages: Languages represented in the collection: English Access Collection is open to research under the terms of use of the Department of Archives and Special Collections, Loyola Marymount University. Publication Rights Materials in the Department of Archives and Special Collections may be subject to copyright. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, Loyola Marymount University does not claim ownership of the copyright of any materials in its collections. The user or publisher must secure permission to publish from the copyright owner. Loyola Marymount University does not assume any responsibility for infringement of copyright or of publication rights held by the original author or artists or his/her heirs, assigns, or executors. -
Gallieo and the Catholic Church
Galileo and the Catholic Church PROF BOB DAVIS, DEPT OF RELIGIOUS EDUCATION Galileo and the Catholic Church • Narrating the Galileo Affair • Understanding the nature of the conflict between Galileo and the Church authorities • Understanding its sequel and its legacy for the interaction of science and religion • Beyond simple dichotomies and stereotypes GALILEO: A Life in Context • 1564-92: Early years • 1616: Condemnation in Padua & Florence of Copernicanism (law of pendulum & • 1616-23: Controversy falling bodies) with Grassi • 1592-1610: Padua/ • 1623-32: Wrote Venice years (a Dialogue Copernican by 1597); • 1633: 2nd Trial use of telescope 1609 • 1633-42: Last years • 1616: 1st Trial under house arrest 3 The Church and Heliocentrism: Pope Paul V and the condemnation of 1616 • initial ecclesiastical sponsorship of Copernicus and the New Science––tacit approval through the reigns of nine popes • Heliocentrism first denounced by Protestant reformers Luther and Melanchton on biblical grounds: the attack on Kepler • Galileo in Rome (1611)––the ‘ridicule of the mathematicians’ v ‘the curiosity of the teachers’ (Clavius) • After receiving counsel from several theologians on the orthodoxy of heliocentrism, the Congregation of the Index officially condemned Copernicanism in 1616 as “false and as completely contradictory to Divine Scriptures.” Endorsed by Paul V, but only ‘for the prevention of the circulation of writings’ and refusing to term it ‘heresy’. • Donec corrigatur––permission for those ‘learned and skilful in the science’ to go on -
556251Syl .Pdf
PROPOSAL (REVISED) FOR RUTGERS SAS CURRICULUM COMMITTEE PAPAL ROME AND ITS PEOPLE, 1500-PRESENT: A SELECT HISTORY ARTS & SCIENCES INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES 01:556:251 Online course, proposed for spring semester 2014 T. Corey Brennan (Department of Classics; Rutgers—NB) DESCRIPTION (FOR CATALOG) A case-study approach toward select aspects of the social, cultural, intellectual and political history of the early modern and modern Popes, with a particular focus on their relationship to the city of Rome. Highlights the reigns of Popes Gregory XIII Boncompagni (1572-1585) and Gregory XV Ludovisi (1621-1623), and their subsequent family history to the present day. Some course lectures pre-recorded on-site in Rome. COURSE OBJECTIVES 1) Gain a fundamental understanding of the history of the Papacy in outline and the significance of that institution from the early modern period to the present day, in the context especially of Italian and wider European history 2) Understand on a basic level the implications of Papal urban interventions in Rome, and the Popes’ more significant patronage and preservation efforts in that city 3) Gain a broad familiarity with the most important Italian families of the Papal nobility who have made a substantial physical contribution to the city of Rome 4) Appreciate the range of primary sources that can be critically employed and analyzed for Papal history, including iconographic material that ranges beyond painting and sculpture to include numismatic evidence, historic photographs and newsreels LEARNING GOALS (THEORETICAL) -
The Pontifical Decrees Against the Doctrine of the Earth’S Movement and the Ultramontane Defence of Them
The Pontifical Decrees Against the Doctrine of The Earth’s Movement and the Ultramontane Defence of Them By Rev. William W. Roberts (1885) Introductory commentary by a Catholic layman in 2002 1543 Nicolaus Copernicus published De Revolutionibus Orbium Cœlestium (On the Revolutions of Spheres). 1534-1549 Reign of Pope Paul III, who was quite aware of Fr. Copernicus’ work. The two were actually friends. 1605-1621 Reign of Pope Paul V, who issued a 1616 decree condemning pro-heliocentricity work of Galileo Galilei. 1623-1644 Reign of Pope Urban VIII, who issued a 2nd decree [1633] condemning Copernicanism. 1655-1657 Reign of Pope Alexander VII, who issued a Bull [1664] reinforcing that Copernicanism was heretical. 1740-1758 Reign of Pope Benedict XIV, who removed the Copernican books from the Index in 1740. 1846-1878 Reign of Pope Pius IX, who called Vatican Council [1869-70] wherein Papal Infallibility was defined. In 1870 the Vatican Council promulgated the dogma of Papal Infallibility. Until then, the infallibility of the Catholic Church’s teachings had never been defined explicitly although accepted by the Fathers throughout its history. This definition brought criticism from those outside the Church and even from some within. There were at least three reasons for this: (1) It decreed that God Himself dictated the teachings of the Catholic Church, a notion that other religions were prone to deny; (2) some did not want to elevate the papacy to an infallible level, even when declaring matters of faith and morals; (3) some believed the Church had erred on previous occasions and that therefore the definition was erroneous. -
Papacy by Richard G
Papacy by Richard G. Mann Encyclopedia Copyright © 2015, glbtq, Inc. Entry Copyright © 2005, glbtq, inc. Reprinted from http://www.glbtq.com The papacy is the monarchy by which the Roman Catholic Church is governed. The head of the Church is called papa--that is, father--in Latin because he is believed to be the spiritual parent of all the faithful. The Pope is entrusted with absolute authority over all aspects of the Catholic Church, including temporal as well as spiritual matters. Pope John Paul II (top) and his successor Like his immediate predecessor John Paul II, the current pope, Benedict XVI, fiercely Benedict XVI (above) denounces homosexual acts. Both John Paul and Benedict have claimed that their have vigorously declarations on homosexuality accord with papal pronouncements over the course of condemned homosexual many centuries. However, no popes prior to John Paul condemned same-sex love with acts. the vigor and consistency that he and Benedict have. Image of Pope Benedict XVI was created by Wikimedia Commons It was only in the twelfth century that popes began to encourage systematic contributor blues_brother enforcement of prohibitions against homosexual acts. Even after that time, the and appears under the papacy often revealed, in practice, a more tolerant attitude toward sexual "deviance" GNU Free than did secular authorities and the general membership of the Church. Among the Documentation License 1.2. popes, there are a few who can be described in modern terminology as being notably "gay friendly." In addition, at least four pontiffs seem to have enjoyed the physical, as well as spiritual, love of other men.