DOCSLIB.ORG

The 6:53 July 78

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The 6:53 July 78 THE 6:53 ISSUE NO. 25 JULY 78 A$0CIRION OF A41LR04D 94$ENGERS Post Office Box 653 • Xenia, Ohio 45385 Thomas R. Pulsifer- President AUGUST lst DEADLINE FOR PUBLIC INPUT ON U.S.D.O.T. A!VlTRAK RESTRUCTURING REPORT see page J for details . , . ~ Ar k Ridership Figures- Dayton, 0, OARP OFFICERS TO IYJEET ON ill.2 l.2..'ZQ 1.212 1.21.§_ JULY 22 IN WORTHINGTON, 0. JANUARY 526 476 905 FEBRUARY JJ1 J47 1147 MARCH J52 568 APRIL 605 67J * MAY 449 1555 JUNE 747 JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER and no air- NOVEMBER DECEMBER sold to revenue Full-Year Both sleepers full to capacity, ten passengers in coach holding sleeping car space not available due to over­ booking; Two coaches hot; No place for dining car crew to rest; Could not handle all people in diner; 22 passen­ gers standing out of Dayton- no seats available; Group tour Dayton to Indianapolis and return in computer, but no space available. ~ 06-J0-78 #31: All coaches hot; 176 on board; Sleeper full, ten others wanted space; No place for diner crew to rest; Not enough room or help to feed all the people. 06-J0-78 #JO: Train sold out; extra coach added, but has no air-cond­ itioning; reportedly had no air-conditioning out of Kansas City. DIRECTORY of the OHIO ASSOCIATION OF RAILROAD PASSENGERS corrected to July l, 1978 PRESIDENT THOMAS R. PULSIFER 1751 Wilshire Drive, Box 371, Xenia 45385 513-372-9868 VICE PRES IDE NT RODGER J. SILLARS 2521 Euclid Heights Blvd., Cleveland Heights 44106 216-932-2781 SECRETARY JOSEPH F. BROVE 3902 Valley View Drive, Lorain 44053 216-282-2130 TREASURER DAVID S. MARSHALL 1024-A Courtney Drive, Dayton 45431 513-252-0481 MEMBERSHIP GARY D. AMATORE 527-H Berlin Road, Huron 44839 419-433-3279 REGIONAL COORDINATORS: Your local contact person representing the organization as a whole. NORTHEASTERN REGION: CLEVELAND AREA JAMES STEVENSON 6069 W. 54th Street, Parma 44129 216-888-2259 AKRON-CANTON AREA J. HOWARD HARDING 489 Qverwood Road, Akron 44313 216-867-5507 YOUNGSTOWN-WARREN AREA G. DOUGLAS HUDSON 3981 Greenmont Drive, S.E., Warren44484 216-856-2557 ASHTABULA-CONNEAUT AREA BILL HUTCHISON 5851 South Ridge West, Ashtabula 44004 216-969-136~ NORTHWESTERN REGION: TOLEDO AREA WILLARD B. EDSON 1008 Eton Road, Toledo 43615 419-536-0643 LIMA AREA JOHN H. KELLER 721 Woodward Avenue, Lima 45805 419-224-9936 CENTRAL REGION: MANSFIELD AREA RICHARD A. FRY P.O. Box 381, Bellville 44813 419-886-2875 COLUMBUS AREA KARL J, GELFER Apt. 6, 67 W. 10th Ave., Columbus 43201 614-421-7080 HOCKING-SCIOTO AREA DAVID LEBOLD 577 Riverview Dr., #204, Columbus 43202 614-261-1549 SOUTH11JESTERN REGION: WESTERN OHIO AREA JAMES W, LEWIS 3134 E. Leffel Lane, Springfield 45505 513--325-4727 OHIO VALLEY AREA RONALD D. GARNER R.R. #2 - Box 105, Mt. Orab 45154 513-444-3098 CINCINNATI AREA ROBERT D. GOLDSTEIN 3315 Jefferson - #22, Cincinnati 45220 513-861-2864 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RAILROAD PASSENGERS 417 New Jersey Avenue, S.E., Washington, DC 20003 Orren Beaty, President; Ross Capon, Executive Director 202-546-1550 NARP REGIONAL DIRECTORS (Region VI) from OHIO: DEAN E. DENLINGER Smith & Schnacke, 2000 Courthouse Plaza NE, PO Box 1817, Dayton 45401 513-226-6527 WILLIAM SNORTELAND 2122 Overbrook Avenue, Lakewood 44107 216-221-1722 ROBERT G. WICKENS 637 North Abbe Road, Elyria 44035 216-365-8231 ::J CD CD c+ Ill'<: P.f-d <: ::E f-d ill 0 f-dZ:'illlO'ti2: c+O'ti H ::E Ul f-'• 0 Ill 8 ::;: f-'•f-d :00 0 f-'• Ill HJ z: (J) 0 10 CD t-' tv HJ Ho c+ 8 ::Yio' : 8 f-'· HJ ;J> Ill ::Y ::J 0 0 CD Ill ::Y Ill ::J C ;J> CD CD CD f-d CD ::Y OOc+!llf-d::Jc+::J::E f-'• :::s 'i <D :::s :::s a' 0 trl ::J <D tv f-'• 0 0 Ill CD 0 c+ ::Y ~0 0 HJ ::>J 0 CD C N 'i f-'• f-'• Ul P, 'i :00 :::s 0 0 c+ f-'• c+ Ul f-'• CD ::Y P, 0 c+O'ti <D Ul 0 'i Oc+::JOrj Kl-'c+::Y'i o:.. CDO>-Q::Y O'iCD 1-'c+Ul >-Q ::YCDI-'c+l-' 0 ::E 1-:iUlCD~ ::Y f-dc+c+OCc+ ;J> CD P.<D o'CD'd ::Y<D 0 c::::oo 'i • O;J>m:::SS!llCDCDP,:::S Ill 0 f-'•0 f-'•CD 0 CD Ill f-'• f-'• ~ 1-:i Ul c+ Ill 'i ::r !-'· c+ >cJ C· ')P,CD C t-<>u P,c+O 0:00 Co' :::SCD!llO aq>c:J<:aq::J <::::Sm::Sc+ Ulo'c+ =o'iC<D:::S c+ o f-'• Ul (1l f-'• Ill Ul 0 0'-()q tJ : CD Ul 0 Ul >c! C 1-'0'ti I-'Q1:1 Q1:J Ul S 0 Ill CD CD f-'•()q ::E CD 0 ::J ::E CD CD +:-<DO Oc+O t-' :::s ~·mo ro:.. .. :::c f-'• P, N CD Ul • >-rJ K c+ f-d CD • CD 1-' CD f-'· CD >-rJ 1-j C •Q1:1 p, CD HJ f-'• ::J \J\ Ill p, c+ c::: f-'• ::r 0 P'i"tJ O::JO<D::>:J\.r\0 Z:<: ::J::J CDc+ aqc+oc o:=so ol-' >:::· ::J<Dm 0 c+:::SCDSCCD::Y >-QUC trim ~ ~ g aq ~ f-'• ~ a' ~ 'i C§ ~ ~ 0 f-d ::;: 1-j aq f-'• OHJ ::YO. c+ ::r • 01-'llJ'i(J)::J 'd H ::Y 0 c+ CD Ul Ill f-'• : c+ 0 ~ t:rl 1-:i 0 CD ::J • 2:'<: Ul c+ Ill t:rl c+ Ill c+ CD f-'• ::Y p, I-' CD I-' 0 f-'• • Ill "-i 'i N f-'• ::;: Ill <D Ul 0 :::s HJ Ill 0 >cJ 8 CD c+ CD ~'i 0 P, f-'• 0 p, 'i f-'• 'i f-d P, Ul CD :OCJl::J c+CCD trl m >-'·c+>-'·HJQ1:J :::s::;: c+ ~ 2S: p, Ul f-'- s Ill HJ P.I2S: c+:::S ::;: CD ;l>::E 0 CD') CD ::r :x: • ;l>f-d oq tJ f-'• 1-' Ill • '<; I-' f-'• 0 CD ::E P, CD ::Y ;J>O >cJ CD C::: 0 ::J CD H <: Ill Ill f-'• 'i C::: Oc+c+OUl ,_,.Ill 0 Ill 1-'·f-d ::;: N::>JCD 0 '<;P, • ::s s 0 Ul :::s :::s c+ • <D f-'• Z::Y 1-''<; <;) ::J p,aq ::J HJ CD f-'•1-j ::J Ill CD <;) ::Y'iC UP,P,'ic+c+::JCDCD f-'• >cJ () :00 8 Ill • Ill>:: CJq :::c o::rw <;) f-'• Ill (J) Ill 0 >-'' 1-' CD Ul (J) 1-'00P,O Olll P'i"OOc+::J'i 'D f-'• CD ::J ::Y c+ :::SCD c+::Eolll«;aq ~sm CDOUl 0 c+')<D lll<D Ul::Till trio a' ::;: f-'• 'i 1-' !-'· p, <D S lll'D :..o.ro ::Y::YH c+ 1-' 0 c+ 8 ::r f-'• <: f-'• c+ <: ::r f-'• :::s 'i ~ 0 0 HJ Ul a' 0 ~ HJ :.. c+ >cJ CD 0 CD ::JI-'<D::S P,::JCD O<DI-'OS lllCD!ll::J <Df-dUl:::S c+::YOO<DUl CDCDCDO Cc+Oc+I-'P, CD f-'• C CD lll<D aq::;: Q1:J:::Sc+ :..:oo OS 'ic+tJ'i Ul 'i 'i <D c+ 0 f-'• ,::: :.. Ul 0>-Q 1-:i :::S 1-' ::J c+ P. 0 'i f-'• C CD 1-' Ill f-'• CD ::E c+ p, s a' <D c+ c+'<; p, a' s c+ 'i Ill f-'• ::;: c+ Ill >-" <D ::;: "-i ::Y'D Ul 1-' :00 ,::: ,::: :00 : Ul >cJ Ul 0 >-'' 'i >cJ 1-' CD 'i 0 c+ c+Ul :::c~ <DO!llO ::YS f-d <D<D!ll~ lll'<:::JO'<: HJ ::Y C CD f-'• p, >cJ Cll <D 0 •• s Ul >-'' -t::--Ei>-1-' :::s aq ,::: • 0 f-'• (1l 0 'i 'i ,::: <D Ill ,::: <D Ul 'i f-'• Pi" c+aq 'i <: CD CD 1-' 0 f-'• <D ~Ill 0 HJ~ Ill 0 \.,.) 0 0 'i ::r ::E:::S f-d <D p, Ul () f-d p, Clli-'::E OUlP,<D<D 'i'i'<:omm c+o.o Pi" ,::: 0 [\) 1-' c+ Pi" • Ill ~ f-'• :::s Ill CD f-'• 1-' CD <D ::Y 0 lCD ~~HJI-j I<D HJ 0 HJ <D'<;')P, I::J ~~ CD'i'i• ~ I ~ f-d ., I'<; I .., I Ul z: 8 f-'•8 'iEJCI-' :00 ~ ~o:r> :::s 0 To~f-'' c+ 'i c+ CDOZ oq H ;J> ) c+ 1-j ::Y :::s 'd tJ Ho c+llJSO 8 8 c+'<~ oqlll roK<DC (1l ,::: 0 8 - 0 f-'' f-'•f-''p,l-' t:rl (J) ::YHJHJ 0 0 CD Ill CD f-'• 0 ,::: 1-j c+ :z: <: '< f-'• 1-'c+ "r~'!'isc+m::Y CD 0 c+ f-'•lll :00 8 CD <D ,::: . ::Jc+ H Ill 'i (1l CD CD (J) Q 1-' (1l c+c+P.C 8 1-j 'i :::s •• c+ -t mf-1 d ~ CD CD 0 ::Y ,::: Ho 1-' ;J> CD ~r·o 8 -t llJSc+ c+ 0 1-j f-'• 8 P.lll :00 H (J) 8C::: 0 c+ f-'•0 - «:f-1c+ trJ ·- KO ::Y .. ,::: <D ~ c:r f~~ ~ ~~ ~ Ill H:-1~ '<? == ~- IT'S NOT I TOO LATE • THAT'S RIGHT! IT I s NOT TOO LATE FOR YOU TO SUBMIT WRITTEN STATEMENTS ON THE USDOT AMTRAK REPORT! Although the public hearings in Ohio are now concluded, there's still time for our members and friends to submit written comments on the Reexamination of the Amtrak Route Structure Report. You have until August l, 1978, to send your--­ written comments to: RAIL SERVICES PLANNING OFFICE ATTN: EX PARTE lli_ 1900 L STREET I N.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Corridor Chase, Maryland January 4, 1987
    PB88-916301 NATIONAL TRANSPORT SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT REAR-END COLLISION OF AMTRAK PASSENGER TRAIN 94, THE COLONIAL AND CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION FREIGHT TRAIN ENS-121, ON THE NORTHEAST CORRIDOR CHASE, MARYLAND JANUARY 4, 1987 NTSB/RAR-88/01 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipient's Catalog No. NTSB/RAR-88/01 . PB88-916301 Title and Subtitle Railroad Accident Report^ 5-Report Date Rear-end Collision of'*Amtrak Passenger Train 949 the January 25, 1988 Colonial and Consolidated Rail Corporation Freight -Performing Organization Train ENS-121, on the Northeast Corridor, Code Chase, Maryland, January 4, 1987 -Performing Organization 7. "Author(s) ~~ Report No. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.Work Unit No. National Transportation Safety Board Bureau of Accident Investigation .Contract or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20594 k3-Type of Report and Period Covered 12.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Iroad Accident Report lanuary 4, 1987 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, D. C. 20594 1*+.Sponsoring Agency Code 15-Supplementary Notes 16 Abstract About 1:16 p.m., eastern standard time, on January 4, 1987, northbound Conrail train ENS -121 departed Bay View yard at Baltimore, Mary1 and, on track 1. The train consisted of three diesel-electric freight locomotive units, all under power and manned by an engineer and a brakeman. Almost simultaneously, northbound Amtrak train 94 departed Pennsylvania Station in Baltimore. Train 94 consisted of two electric locomotive units, nine coaches, and three food service cars. In addition to an engineer, conductor, and three assistant conductors, there were seven Amtrak service employees and about 660 passengers on the train.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Rail Service the Vermont Way
    DRAFT Regional Rail Service The Vermont Way Authored by Christopher Parker and Carl Fowler November 30, 2017 Contents Contents 2 Executive Summary 4 The Budd Car RDC Advantage 5 Project System Description 6 Routes 6 Schedule 7 Major Employers and Markets 8 Commuter vs. Intercity Designation 10 Project Developer 10 Stakeholders 10 Transportation organizations 10 Town and City Governments 11 Colleges and Universities 11 Resorts 11 Host Railroads 11 Vermont Rail Systems 11 New England Central Railroad 12 Amtrak 12 Possible contract operators 12 Dispatching 13 Liability Insurance 13 Tracks and Right-of-Way 15 Upgraded Track 15 Safety: Grade Crossing Upgrades 15 Proposed Standard 16 Upgrades by segment 16 Cost of Upgrades 17 Safety 19 Platforms and Stations 20 Proposed Stations 20 Existing Stations 22 Construction Methods of New Stations 22 Current and Historical Precedents 25 Rail in Vermont 25 Regional Rail Service in the United States 27 New Mexico 27 Maine 27 Oregon 28 Arizona and Rural New York 28 Rural Massachusetts 28 Executive Summary For more than twenty years various studies have responded to a yearning in Vermont for a regional passenger rail service which would connect Vermont towns and cities. This White Paper, commissioned by Champ P3, LLC reviews the opportunities for and obstacles to delivering rail service at a rural scale appropriate for a rural state. Champ P3 is a mission driven public-private partnership modeled on the Eagle P3 which built Denver’s new commuter rail network. Vermont’s two railroads, Vermont Rail System and Genesee & Wyoming, have experience hosting and operating commuter rail service utilizing Budd cars.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago-South Bend-Toledo-Cleveland-Erie-Buffalo-Albany-New York Frequency Expansion Report – Discussion Draft 2 1
    Chicago-South Bend-Toledo-Cleveland-Erie-Buffalo- Albany-New York Frequency Expansion Report DISCUSSION DRAFT (Quantified Model Data Subject to Refinement) Table of Contents 1. Project Background: ................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Early Study Efforts and Initial Findings: ................................................................................................ 5 3. Background Data Collection Interviews: ................................................................................................ 6 4. Fixed-Facility Capital Cost Estimate Range Based on Existing Studies: ............................................... 7 5. Selection of Single Route for Refined Analysis and Potential “Proxy” for Other Routes: ................ 9 6. Legal Opinion on Relevant Amtrak Enabling Legislation: ................................................................... 10 7. Sample “Timetable-Format” Schedules of Four Frequency New York-Chicago Service: .............. 12 8. Order-of-Magnitude Capital Cost Estimates for Platform-Related Improvements: ............................ 14 9. Ballpark Station-by-Station Ridership Estimates: ................................................................................... 16 10. Scoping-Level Four Frequency Operating Cost and Revenue Model: .................................................. 18 11. Study Findings and Conclusions: .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • November/December 2020
    Nov. – Dec. 2020 Issue Number 865 Editor’s Comments The next Membership meeting will be a virtual Zoom meeting at 7:30 p.m. Thursday, January 7. Inside This Issue If you know someone who wants to view the meeting, either a visiting railfan or an interested person, it is okay to pass the Editor’s Comments 1 link onto them (but please do not send to large groups). Inside This Issue 1 Watch for an email with meeting sign-in details. Club Officers 1 President’s Comments You will notice that this issue is a bit longer than our normal. 2 We decided that it was time to better coordinate the issue Amtrak News 2 month with the calendar, so this issue is a one-time combina- Pictures from Many of the CRRC Steam Trips 3-6 tion of two months of H & M. In January, we will return to our typical monthly issue of 16 pages. In the meantime, Virtual Railfanning in Time of COVID-19 7 please enjoy this month’s articles and its many photos. Santa Fe, Ohio? 8-9 Happy Holidays! Let’s all have a safe and happy New Year! A Visit to Kentucky Steam Heritage Corporation 10-15 Railfan’s Diary 16-21 Do you have thoughts and questions that you’d like to Steam News 22-27 share in future Headlight & Markers? Meeting Notice 28 Send electronic submissions to: [email protected] Perhaps you’ve thought of submitting an article or two --- now would be a great time to do so! Dave Puthoff Club Officers Club Email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Boston-Montreal High Speed Rail Project
    Boston to Montreal High- Speed Rail Planning and Feasibility Study Phase I Final Report prepared for Vermont Agency of Transportation New Hampshire Department of Transportation Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation and Construction prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas with Cambridge Systematics Fitzgerald and Halliday HNTB, Inc. KKO and Associates April 2003 final report Boston to Montreal High-Speed Rail Planning and Feasibility Study Phase I prepared for Vermont Agency of Transportation New Hampshire Department of Transportation Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation and Construction prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas with Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Fitzgerald and Halliday HNTB, Inc. KKO and Associates April 2003 Boston to Montreal High-Speed Rail Feasibility Study Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... ES-1 E.1 Background and Purpose of the Study ............................................................... ES-1 E.2 Study Overview...................................................................................................... ES-1 E.3 Ridership Analysis................................................................................................. ES-8 E.4 Government and Policy Issues............................................................................. ES-12 E.5 Conclusion..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ms 711 Rg 1 National Railroad Passenger Corporation / Amtrak : James L
    MS 711 RG 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION / AMTRAK : JAMES L. LARSON OPERATIONS AND PLANNING FILES 1971-2003, bulk 1976-2003. 16.5 linear ft. Original order has been maintained. The James L. Larson files are arranged in the following series: 1. REPORTS 2. CHRONOLOGICAL FILES 3. LAWSUITS PROVENANCE Gift of Mrs. Mary Larson (387-2090), 2011. HISTORICAL INFORMATION James Llewellyn Larson was born on March 27, 1935 in Madison, Wisconsin to Ruth (Thurber) and LeRoy Larson. While attending high school, Mr. Larson spent many hours at the Chicago and North Western Railway Company's interlocking tower in Madison, Wisconsin where he learned telegraphy. He went to work for the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, and Pacific Railroad in 1952 as an agent, telegrapher, and tower operator. In 1953, Mr. Larson began working for the Chicago and North Western Transportation Company as a telegrapher, then as a wire changer. During his 20-year tenure with C&NW, he worked in the Operating Department, was a Train Dispatcher from 1957 to 1959, and then spent eight years as an Assistant Trainmaster and a Trainmaster. He was a System Rules Examiner from 1966 to 1968, an Assistant Division Superintendent from 1968 to 1969, Assistant Superintendent -Transportation from 1969 to 1972, where he managed Operations Center in Chicago. From 1972 to 1973, he was an Assistant Division Master of Transportation on the Twin Cities Division. Mr. Larson was recruited by Amtrak in 1973. During his 25-year tenure with Amtrak he served as Manager of Station Operations, Director of Personnel, Assistant Vice President of Administrative Staff, and Assistant Vice President of Contracts.
    [Show full text]
  • Ii Ii Will There Be Two Daily Amtrak Trains in the Cleveland-Pittsburgh Corridor? Oarp Continues Work for New Services!
    II II JUNE 1989 OHIO ASSOCIATION OF RAILROAO PASSENGERS ISSUE #83 WILL THERE BE TWO DAILY AMTRAK TRAINS IN THE CLEVELAND-PITTSBURGH CORRIDOR? OARP CONTINUES WORK FOR NEW SERVICES! A Cleveland- Pittsburgh Update by KEN PRENDERGAST, Coordinator of OARP's new Cleveland­ Pittsburgh Corridor Special Project ! This is the first column I am writing as Coordinator for ,I II the newly-established Cleveland-Pittsburgh Corridor Pro­ 1 1 II ject. At the OARP Board Meeting on May 20th, the Board II :, approved the creation of an OARP Special Project for the II II CLE-PIT Corridor, and whereby I would be the Coordinator I 'I for this Project. I appreciate this opportunity to lead this worthwhile and successful effort! This new Special Project will not drain on OARP's Treasury. Expenses will li 1i II I be incurred only as Project-specific contributions are re­ I' ceived. OARP has made requests for contributions ranging II II :1 I from $500 ot $4000 from various on-line communities and businesses. As the grant money comes in, Project expenses il will be incurred, but not before. If you have ideas of ,,I who should be approached for grant money, let me know. : ~ Enough talk of what we're going to do. I would like to update some of what OARP and Amtrak have been doing in the last two months ... Foremost, the Amtrak study on the PENNSYLVANIAN extension is essentially complete. However, it has not been released to the public as of this writing. I am disappointed that Amtrak is dragging their feet on the completion and release of the study's final results.
    [Show full text]
  • Montrealer Gets Amfleet Equipment, ____------, I Refurbished Electric Sleepers
    VoI. 5, No. 3 March 1978 Montrealer Gets Amfleet Equipment, ____------, I Refurbished Electric Sleepers Amtrak's Montrealer, which with the inauguration of the new "Soup, etc." This includes a large connects Washington, New York and equipment. bowl of soup, a loaf of hot French Montreal with overnight service via Dinner entrees include breast of bread with butter, a wedge of cheese Vermont, has begun operating with Cornish hen with wild rice and filet and an apple. new Amfleet coach es and refurbished mignon with Parisienne potatoes. Wines, beers and ales and distilled electric sleeping cars. Both include vegetables, salad and spirits are also available. The first newly-equipped train ran desert. The Montrealer traditionally is a northbound on Monday, February Lighter fare is also available, in­ train with a multi-faceted personality. 27, with the first southbound trip for cluding hot sandwiches and quiche A large number of its passengers the new equipment the next evening. Lorraine. One special light food travel only on the segment between For the train's passen gers the choice on the train is an item called (Continued on page 7) conversion from the older steam­ heated rail cars to Amtrak's newest Amfleet equipment means obvious improvements in comfort, reliability Sixth San Diegan Begins Service and decor. Coach passengers now travel in A sixth train in each direction has 8:20 a.m. It leaves Los Angeles, new 60-seat, long-distance Am­ been added to the Los Angeles-San Sunday through Friday, at 4:30 p.m., coaches with wide, reclining seats Diego corridor beginning February with arrival in San Diego at 7:04 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Skiis and Ie Pub Ahracl Riders 10 Monlrealer
    A Newsletter for Amtrak Employees VOLUME 2-ISSUE 5 March 19,1973 Le Pub passengers (left) enjoy themselves under the w atching eye of an ABC camera filming the Montrealer for a network news show. At right, Penn Central Conductor W. A. Kra usse directs ski-lad en passengers to the train's spe­ cial baggage car. skiis and Ie pub aHracl riders 10 monlrealer Pub combines comfort, romance and nostalgia with The scene is a familiar one-reminiscent of many a origi na Ii ty of decor (a su rprisi ngly subtl e blend of red, " good time" Friday or Saturday night. Dimly lit room; orange and purple). The result is a very obvious exam­ low intimate tables; chai rs that curl comfortably around ple of an important advantage of rail travel. Traveling their occupants. A bar is tucked into one corner of the by train is fun. Montrealer passengers can party their room, balanced at the other end by a piano. The piano way to their destinations; half their enjoyment is de­ player breaks into "Raindrops keep falling on my head" rived from the trip itself. to the enthusiastic reaction of a group of four at the Skiiers are taking advantage this winter season of the nearest table. Their harmonizing blends with the rhythm good time the Montrealer offers. Besides the addition of th~ piano, the murmur of many conversations, and of Le Pub to the train for the ski season, Amtrak has the click of flanged wheels against steel rail as Amtrak's gone out of its way to make skiiers welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Knowledge Corridor Passenger Rail Project FRA Award and Next Steps
    Introduction to the Knowledge Corridor Passenger Rail Project FRA Award and Next Steps March 23, 2010 White House Press Release on HSIPR Funding Awards “This corridor has one train per day connecting communities in central Connecticut and Massachusetts to the Northeast Corridor and Vermont. The vision for this corridor is to restore the alignment to its original route via the Knowledge Corridor in western Massachusetts, improving trip time and increasing the population base that can be served.” Historical Timeline of Project { 1971 – Amtrak takes over operation of passenger service in the US { 1972 – Montrealer service resumed under Amtrak { 1989 – Montrealer moved to Central Vermont Railroad via New London { 1995 – Last run of Montrealer { 1995 – First run of Vermonter as state supported train between Springfield & St. Albans, Vermont { 2000 – Hartford Regional Transit Strategy renewed discussion of Springfield to New Haven Commuter Service Historic Timeline (continued) { 2000 – Knowledge Corridor created as economic and cultural partnership between Springfield & Hartford { 2003 – Initial meetings with Mayors of Northampton & Holyoke on rail service on Conn River Line { 2005 – Knowledge Corridor Feasibility Study funded through Federal Transportation Bill { 2008 – Knowledge Corridor Feasibility Study Begun (Completed 2009); Passenger Rail Infrastructure and Investment Act { 2009 – July 10 – HSIPR Pre-Application submitted; Track 1A and Track 2 Applications submitted { 2010 – January 28 Track 2 Project Award Grant Application to Federal
    [Show full text]
  • Vermont State Rail Plan 2015
    Vermont State Rail Plan 2015 Prepared for: Vermont Agency of Transportation October 2015 Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff Cambridge Systematics Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc. Vermont State Rail Plan – 2015 Table of Contents ES.1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... I ES.1.1.Vermont Rail Network ................................................................................................................................ I ES.1.2.Usage of the Vermont Rail Network ......................................................................................................... IV ES.1.3.Vision, Goals, and Objectives .................................................................................................................... VI ES.1.4.Passenger Rail Issues, Needs and Initiatives.............................................................................................. VI ES.1.4.1. Performance and Cost of Current Service .......................................................................................... VI ES.1.4.2. Proposed New Services .................................................................................................................... VII ES.1.4.3. Long-Term Goal: FRA Track Class 4 on All Passenger Rail Routes ...................................................... VIII ES.1.4.4. Vermont Passenger Rail Priorities .................................................................................................... VIII ES.1.5.Freight
    [Show full text]