DOCSLIB.ORG

Amtrak Cascades

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amtrak Cascades Amtrak International Operations to Canada Eastern Border Transportation Coalition May 25, 2011 Brief History • First Amtrak operations to Canada and Mexico ordered by Congress 1972 – Seattle – Vancouver – “Pacific International” – Washington – Montreal – “Montrealer” – Ft. Worth – Laredo – “Inter-American” • Later additions – New York – Detroit – “Niagara Rainbow” – Chicago – Port Huron – Sarnia – Toronto – “International” – New York – Toronto – “Maple Leaf” • Only one operating today in original form 1 Current Operations • “Amtrak Cascades” – Portland – Seattle – Vancouver BC – First train since 1995; second train since 2009 • “Maple Leaf” – New York – Niagara Falls – Toronto – Since 1981 replacing a former VIA Rail Canada connection • “Adirondack” – New York – Rouses Point – Montreal – Since 1974 • All are current or prospective state corridor trains under Section 209 of PRIIA • All but second Vancouver train pre-date 9/11 2 Potential Future Operations • “Vermonter” extension north of St. Albans to Montreal – Tentatively late 2012 – High priority for Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin – Would reconstitute former “Montrealer” but on a daytime schedule • Continental Rail Gateway – New Detroit – Windsor tunnel – After 2014 – Potential Chicago – Detroit – Toronto – Montreal combined Amtrak / VIA Rail Canada corridor 3 Adirondack Maple Leaf Cascades International Ridership (Montreal) (Toronto) (Vancouver) Annual *through *through March *through *through March *through *through March 10,000 150 8,000 100 6,000 Northbound Thousands 50 Southbound Riders 4,000 0 2,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011* 0 Northbound Southbound Jul-07 Jul-08 Jul-09 Jul-10 Jan-07 Apr-07 Jan-08 Apr-08 Jan-09 Apr-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Oct-06 Oct-07 Oct-08 Oct-09 10,000 70 60 8,000 50 40 6,000 30 Northbound Thousands 20 Southbound Riders 4,000 10 0 2,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011* 0 Monthly Northbound Southbound Jul-07 Jul-08 Jul-09 Jul-10 Jan-07 Apr-07 Jan-08 Apr-08 Jan-09 Apr-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Oct-06 Oct-07 Oct-08 Oct-09 10,000 100 80 8,000 60 6,000 40 Northbound Thousands Southbound 20 Riders 4,000 0 2,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011* 0 Northbound Southbound Jul-07 Jul-08 Jul-09 Jul-10 Jan-07 Apr-07 Jan-08 Apr-08 Jan-09 Apr-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Oct-06 Oct-07 Oct-08 Oct-09 4 Lack of Process for Border Security • Customs and Immigration inspection processes evolved locally and independently following 9/11 • Before 9/11 informal on-train screening was satisfactory • Passenger rail does not fit air or highway models • Issues other than terrorism • On train inspection no longer satisfactory from the perspective of border agencies – Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) – U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 5 Agency Issues with On-Board Inspection • Lacks the privacy to properly interview travelers especially about sensitive issues • Inability to clearly match every item of baggage to its owner • Poor connectivity with agency information technologies • Safety and security risks with potentially unruly passengers and officer firearms • Inability to inspect a completely empty train 6 Amtrak Issues with Enroute Off-Board Inspection • Serious inconvenience to passengers • Unsafe at low platforms especially in bad weather – Elderly and ADA passengers – Passengers carrying infants and small children • Long border dwell times cause longer trip times • All passengers must wait until the last passenger has cleared • Frequent delays would exacerbate poor on-time performance at down-line stations • In conflict with intent of PRIIA to improve on-time performance 7 Possible Solutions • End point customs and immigration processing in Canada with non-stop closed-door operation north of the border – Vancouver – Montreal • New methods for on-board processing that mitigate concerns of border authorities – Niagara Falls for Toronto 8 More Immediate Issues • “Amtrak Cascades” at Vancouver – CBSA funding for the second train ends October 31 – New funding must be obtained to avoid discontinuance • “Maple Leaf” at Niagara Falls – Canadian National abandoning Whirlpool Bridge rights – Bridge Commission seeking agreement with new operator – Quick resolution needed before service must be discontinued • “Adirondack” at Montreal – Both CBSA and Amtrak want to do C&I in Montreal – Tentative conceptual plan developed by Amtrak – Funding required to validate concept in Canada – Alternative could be a full offload of passengers and baggage at the border 9 High Speed Rail Overview Federal Investment Highlights (2009-2011) 11 Summary of Federal Investments (2009-2011) 12 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Route Maps & Schedules
    Route Maps & Schedules oregon-point.com/route-landing/ Cascades (Portland-Eugene) The Cascades Route provides daily bus service between Downtown Portland and the University of Oregon in Eugene, serving 5 cities and making a total of 6 stops. Click address for map 5541 5501 5503 5545 5517 5547 5507 Schedule Notes Mon-Fri Sat, Sun, Only Holiday Portland 6:00 am 11:10 12:25 1:30 pm 3:15 pm 7:00 pm 10:00 pm Union Station am pm 800 NW Sixth Ave. Portland, OR 97209 Woodburn 12:05 1:25 pm 2:25 pm 4:10 pm 8:10 pm Memorial Transit pm Facility 2895 Newberg Hwy. Woodburn, OR 97071 Salem 7:15 am 12:30 1:55 pm 2:55 pm 4:35 pm 8:35 pm 11:25 pm Amtrak Station pm 500 13th St. SE Salem, OR 97301 Albany 7:50 am 1:10 pm 2:30 pm 3:25 pm 5:30 pm 9:15 pm 12:05 pm Amtrak Station 110 10th Ave. SW Albany, OR 97321 Eugene 8:40 2:00 3:20 4:05 6:20 10:05 12:40 Amtrak Station am* pm* pm* pm* pm* pm* am* 433 Willamette St. Eugene, OR 97401 1/3 Click address for map 5541 5501 5503 5545 5517 5547 5507 University of Oregon 8:50 am 2:15 pm 3:35 pm 4:20 pm 6:35 pm 10:20 pm 12:50 am Hayward Field 1515 Agate St. Eugene, OR 97403 * = No boardings at this stop. Bus will only stop to drop off passengers and may leave before the time shown.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • Leading Marines"
    Vol. 23 no. 14 Serving Marine Forces Pacific, MCB Hawaii, Ill Marine Expeditionary Forces, Hawaii and 1st Radio Battalion April 13, 1995 Commandant unveils "Leading Marines" packed passages. Each anecdote is fbl- Fred Carr lowed by a provocative 1QMC Information Office.' summary that leads the reader in a search of his or her General Carl E. Mundy, Jr., is own analysis of leadership traits, ulti- bequeathing the Corps of Marines he mately causing one to ask, "How would commanded for the past four years with I have responded to the situation'?" a poignant reminder of what he views Although "Leading Marines" could as the most important responsibility of easily be a one-sitting perusal for fast The Easter Bunny is here. Find everyone who wears the uniform - readers, it should be viewed as a living out what it takes to have one Leadership. reference," always available to re-kin- of your own...See B-1. The Commandant, who is scheduled dle the motivation and inspiration that to retire July 1, has authorized the pub- define the Marine Corps brand of lead- Retired Activities lication of Fleet Marine Force Manual ership in action. 1-0, "Leading Marines," with instruc- "Our actions as Marines every day tions that every Marine, regardless of must embody the legacy of those who A Retired Activities Office has been rank, receive a personal copy. went before us," Mundy continues in established in building 216 aboard try 1)n Winferstet. "If we expect Marines to lead and if we the foreword. "Their memorial to us MCB Hawaii, Kaneohe Bay to pro- - expect Marines to follow, we must pro- their teaching, compassion, courage.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue of Play on October 4 & 5 at the "The 6 :,53"
    I the 'It, 980 6:53 OCTOBER !li AMTRAK... ... now serving BRYAN and LOVELAND ... returns to INDIA,NAPOLIS then turns em away Amtrak's LAKE SHORE LIMITED With appropriate "first trip" is now making regular stops inaugural festivities, Amtrak every day at BRYAN in north­ introduced daily operation of western Ohio. The westbound its new HOOSIER STATE on the train stops at 11:34am and 1st of October between IND­ the eastbound train stops at IANAPOLIS and CHICAGO. Sev­ 8:15pm. eral OARP members were on the Amtrak's SHENANDOAH inaugural trip, including Ray is now stopping daily at a Kline, Dave Marshall and Nick new station stop in suburban Noe. Complimentary champagne Cincinnati. The eastbound was served to all passengers SHENANDOAH stops at LOVELAND and Amtrak public affairs at 7:09pm and the westbound representatives passed out train stops at 8:15am. A m- Amtrak literature. One of trak began both new stops on the Amtrak reps was also pas­ Sunday, October 26th. Sev­ sing out OARP brochures! [We eral OARP members were on don't miss an opportunity!] hand at both stations as the Our members reported that the "first trains" rolled in. inaugural round trip was a OARP has supported both new good one, with on-time oper­ station stops and we are ation the whole way. Tracks glad they have finally come permit 70mph speeds much of about. Both communities are the way and the only rough supportive of their new Am­ track was noted near Chicago. trak service. How To Find Amtrak held another in its The Station Maps for both series of FAMILY DAYS with BRYAN qnd LOVELAND will be much equipment on public dis­ fopnd' inside this issue of play on October 4 & 5 at the "the 6 :,53".
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Rail I
    Canadian Rail i No. 328 MAY 1919 ..:, -~IAN ISSN 0006 - 46.75 Published monthly by The Canadian Railroad Historical Association P.O. Bo x 22, Station B Montreal Quebec Canada H3B 3J5 EDITOR: M. Peter Murphy EDITOR EMERITUS: S. S. Worthen BUSINESS CAR: J. A. Beatty OFFICIAL CARTOGRAPHER: William A. Germani uk LAYOUT: Michel Paul et CALGARY & SOUTH WESTERN L. M. Unwin, Secretary 60-6100 4th Ave. NE Calgary, Alberta T2A 5Z8 OTTAWA D. E. Stoltz, Secretary P. O. Box 141, Station A, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 8V1 FRONT COVER: PACIFIC COAST This is AMTRAK train #64 the R. Keillor, Secretary 'Niagara Rainbow' crossing P. O. Box 1006, Station A, Vancouver the Falls View Bridge over the British Columbia V6C 2P1 Ni aga ra Ri ve r between Ontari 0 ROCKY MOUNTAIN and New York State. The photo C. K. Hatcher, Secretary was taken on December 29, 1978 P. O. Bo x 6102, Station C, Edmonton and this passenger service was A1 berta T5B 2NO discontinued on January 31, 1979. Note the CN. RDC's in the back­ WINDSOR-ESSEX DIVISION ground as well as the CN freight R. Ballard, Sr., Secretary about to cross their bridge. 300 Cabana Road East, Windsor, Ontario N9G 1A2 OPPOSITE: TORONTO & YORK DIVISION This is a typi cal train before J. C. Kyle, Secretary discontinuation of the 'Niagara P. O. Box 5849, Terminal A, Toronto Rainbow' which operated between Ontario M5W 1P3 Detroit (Windsor), Niagara Falls, NIAGARA DIVISION Buffalo and New York. The train Peter Warwick, Secretory usually consisted of one diner, P.O. Box 593 two coaches and a baggage car.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Corridor Chase, Maryland January 4, 1987
    PB88-916301 NATIONAL TRANSPORT SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT REAR-END COLLISION OF AMTRAK PASSENGER TRAIN 94, THE COLONIAL AND CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION FREIGHT TRAIN ENS-121, ON THE NORTHEAST CORRIDOR CHASE, MARYLAND JANUARY 4, 1987 NTSB/RAR-88/01 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipient's Catalog No. NTSB/RAR-88/01 . PB88-916301 Title and Subtitle Railroad Accident Report^ 5-Report Date Rear-end Collision of'*Amtrak Passenger Train 949 the January 25, 1988 Colonial and Consolidated Rail Corporation Freight -Performing Organization Train ENS-121, on the Northeast Corridor, Code Chase, Maryland, January 4, 1987 -Performing Organization 7. "Author(s) ~~ Report No. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.Work Unit No. National Transportation Safety Board Bureau of Accident Investigation .Contract or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20594 k3-Type of Report and Period Covered 12.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Iroad Accident Report lanuary 4, 1987 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, D. C. 20594 1*+.Sponsoring Agency Code 15-Supplementary Notes 16 Abstract About 1:16 p.m., eastern standard time, on January 4, 1987, northbound Conrail train ENS -121 departed Bay View yard at Baltimore, Mary1 and, on track 1. The train consisted of three diesel-electric freight locomotive units, all under power and manned by an engineer and a brakeman. Almost simultaneously, northbound Amtrak train 94 departed Pennsylvania Station in Baltimore. Train 94 consisted of two electric locomotive units, nine coaches, and three food service cars. In addition to an engineer, conductor, and three assistant conductors, there were seven Amtrak service employees and about 660 passengers on the train.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Rail Service the Vermont Way
    DRAFT Regional Rail Service The Vermont Way Authored by Christopher Parker and Carl Fowler November 30, 2017 Contents Contents 2 Executive Summary 4 The Budd Car RDC Advantage 5 Project System Description 6 Routes 6 Schedule 7 Major Employers and Markets 8 Commuter vs. Intercity Designation 10 Project Developer 10 Stakeholders 10 Transportation organizations 10 Town and City Governments 11 Colleges and Universities 11 Resorts 11 Host Railroads 11 Vermont Rail Systems 11 New England Central Railroad 12 Amtrak 12 Possible contract operators 12 Dispatching 13 Liability Insurance 13 Tracks and Right-of-Way 15 Upgraded Track 15 Safety: Grade Crossing Upgrades 15 Proposed Standard 16 Upgrades by segment 16 Cost of Upgrades 17 Safety 19 Platforms and Stations 20 Proposed Stations 20 Existing Stations 22 Construction Methods of New Stations 22 Current and Historical Precedents 25 Rail in Vermont 25 Regional Rail Service in the United States 27 New Mexico 27 Maine 27 Oregon 28 Arizona and Rural New York 28 Rural Massachusetts 28 Executive Summary For more than twenty years various studies have responded to a yearning in Vermont for a regional passenger rail service which would connect Vermont towns and cities. This White Paper, commissioned by Champ P3, LLC reviews the opportunities for and obstacles to delivering rail service at a rural scale appropriate for a rural state. Champ P3 is a mission driven public-private partnership modeled on the Eagle P3 which built Denver’s new commuter rail network. Vermont’s two railroads, Vermont Rail System and Genesee & Wyoming, have experience hosting and operating commuter rail service utilizing Budd cars.
    [Show full text]
  • FROM BULLDOGS to SUN DEVILS the EARLY YEARS ASU BASEBALL 1907-1958 Year ...Record
    THE TRADITION CONTINUES ASUBASEBALL 2005 2005 SUN DEVIL BASEBALL 2 There comes a time in a little boy’s life when baseball is introduced to him. Thus begins the long journey for those meant to play the game at a higher level, for those who love the game so much they strive to be a part of its history. Sun Devil Baseball! NCAA NATIONAL CHAMPIONS: 1965, 1967, 1969, 1977, 1981 2005 SUN DEVIL BASEBALL 3 ASU AND THE GOLDEN SPIKES AWARD > For the past 26 years, USA Baseball has honored the top amateur baseball player in the country with the Golden Spikes Award. (See winners box.) The award is presented each year to the player who exhibits exceptional athletic ability and exemplary sportsmanship. Past winners of this prestigious award include current Major League Baseball stars J. D. Drew, Pat Burrell, Jason Varitek, Jason Jennings and Mark Prior. > Arizona State’s Bob Horner won the inaugural award in 1978 after hitting .412 with 20 doubles and 25 RBI. Oddibe McDowell (1984) and Mike Kelly (1991) also won the award. > Dustin Pedroia was named one of five finalists for the 2004 Golden Spikes Award. He became the seventh all-time final- ist from ASU, including Horner (1978), McDowell (1984), Kelly (1990), Kelly (1991), Paul Lo Duca (1993) and Jacob Cruz (1994). ODDIBE MCDOWELL > With three Golden Spikes winners, ASU ranks tied for first with Florida State and Cal State Fullerton as the schools with the most players to have earned college baseball’s top honor. BOB HORNER GOLDEN SPIKES AWARD WINNERS 2004 Jered Weaver Long Beach State 2003 Rickie Weeks Southern 2002 Khalil Greene Clemson 2001 Mark Prior Southern California 2000 Kip Bouknight South Carolina 1999 Jason Jennings Baylor 1998 Pat Burrell Miami 1997 J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago-South Bend-Toledo-Cleveland-Erie-Buffalo-Albany-New York Frequency Expansion Report – Discussion Draft 2 1
    Chicago-South Bend-Toledo-Cleveland-Erie-Buffalo- Albany-New York Frequency Expansion Report DISCUSSION DRAFT (Quantified Model Data Subject to Refinement) Table of Contents 1. Project Background: ................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Early Study Efforts and Initial Findings: ................................................................................................ 5 3. Background Data Collection Interviews: ................................................................................................ 6 4. Fixed-Facility Capital Cost Estimate Range Based on Existing Studies: ............................................... 7 5. Selection of Single Route for Refined Analysis and Potential “Proxy” for Other Routes: ................ 9 6. Legal Opinion on Relevant Amtrak Enabling Legislation: ................................................................... 10 7. Sample “Timetable-Format” Schedules of Four Frequency New York-Chicago Service: .............. 12 8. Order-of-Magnitude Capital Cost Estimates for Platform-Related Improvements: ............................ 14 9. Ballpark Station-by-Station Ridership Estimates: ................................................................................... 16 10. Scoping-Level Four Frequency Operating Cost and Revenue Model: .................................................. 18 11. Study Findings and Conclusions: .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific International Lines Chinese Shipping Company Benefits from Having Unit4 Aboard
    Unit4 Financials case study Pacific International Lines Chinese shipping company benefits from having Unit4 aboard Pacific International Lines operates from 23 sites across China and Singapore and it is crucial that every operation is working from the same up-to-the-minute management information. Unit4 Financials (formerly Coda) provides key performance data instantly across the entire organization, including 15 sites in China alone, so the company can optimize profitability and competitiveness. Overview Multi-site Chinese operations require Pacific International Lines (PIL) was established in specialist, world-leading financial software 1967 and has developed from a coastal ship-owner/ As a truly diverse organization, PIL has to collate and operator in Singapore to become one of the largest deliver performance information about its cargo and ship owners in Asia. Today, it is ranked among the shipments to whoever may require it, in a relevant top container ship operators in the world. PIL has form for the person requesting it. Mr. Ronald Koh, diversified into logistics related activities, such as Chief Accountant at PIL explains: “We recognize that supply chain management, consolidation/distribution delivering this kind of information is the responsibility facilities, warehousing, container depot operations of the financial accounting function and we must and trucking, as well as having interest in ship- have systems in place to support that. As part of the agencies worldwide, container manufacturing, marine organization’s e-business program, we wanted to engineering and real estate. improve the speed of information delivery to ensure we could report, on request, up-to-date numbers As a pioneer foreign shipping line that entered the relating to our Asian shipping business.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway History Chronology
    St. Thomas Railway History Chronology 1834 - The plan for the Great Western Railway (GWR) is conceived. An economic depression delays implementation for several years. 23 October 1847 - Sod-turning commences for the GWR. It becomes the largest system in Southwestern Ontario. 1850s - Surveying for railway lines is conducted in the St. Thomas area by different railroad companies. Among those reported in the St. Thomas Weekly Dispatch are routes to Simcoe and Amherstburg. 1854 - Citizens of St. Thomas are disappointed that the GWR decided to build through London from Windsor to Niagara Falls instead of St. Thomas. St. Thomas’s leading citizens had been campaigning for years for a railway. 1856 - The London and Port Stanley Railway (L&PS) is inaugurated. Though it was initially supported by St. Thomas, it turned out to be a financial disaster, as St. Thomas merchants lost customers to London. The city purchased shares in the company for $125,000.00 a piece and later sold them to the City of London, who owned the line, for $25,000.00 per share. 1868 - The Erie and Niagara Extension Railway is chartered and the following year it is renamed the Canada Southern Railway (CASO). Late 1860’s - William A. Thomson rallies support for the CASO run between Amherstburg and Fort Erie to connect to St. Thomas. He is successful. 1871 - The CASO Station is built in anticipation of the railroad’s arrival the following year. It still stands today. 1872- The GWR, afraid of losing traffic to the CASO, constructed a rival St. Thomas to Glencoe line, thereby affording St.
    [Show full text]