DOCSLIB.ORG

Amtrak “Montrealer” on Georgia High Bridge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

APRIL 22, 2019 ■■■■■■■■■■■ VOLUME 39 ■■■■■■■■■■ NUMBER 4 Amtrak “Montrealer” on Georgia High Bridge 13 17 The Semaphore David N. Clinton, Editor-in-Chief CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Southeastern Massachusetts…………………. Paul Cutler, Jr. “The Operator”………………………………… Paul Cutler III Cape Cod News………………………………….Skip Burton Boston Herald Reporter……………………… Jim South 24 Boston Globe & Wall Street Journal Reporters Paul Bonanno, Jack Foley Western Massachusetts………………………. Ron Clough Rhode Island News…………………………… Tony Donatelli “The Chief’s Corner”……………………… . Fred Lockhart Mid-Atlantic News……………………………. Doug Buchanan PRODUCTION STAFF Publication…………….………………… …. … Al Taylor Al Munn Jim Ferris Bryan Miller Web Page …………………..………………… Savery Moore Club Photographer……………………………. Joe Dumas Guest Contributor……………………………… Peter Palica The Semaphore is the monthly (except July) newsletter of the South Shore Model Railway Club & Museum (SSMRC) and any opinions found herein are those of the authors thereof and of the Editors and do not necessarily reflect any policies of this organization. The SSMRC, as a non-profit organization, does not endorse any position. Your comments are welcome! Please address all correspondence regarding this publication to: The Semaphore, 11 Hancock Rd., Hingham, MA 02043. ©2019 E-mail: [email protected] Club phone: 781-740-2000. Web page: www.ssmrc.org VOLUME 39 ■■■■■ NUMBER 4 ■■■■■ APRIL 2019 CLUB OFFICERS BILL OF LADING President………………….Jack Foley Vice-President…….. …..Dan Peterson Treasurer………………....Will Baker Chief’s Corner ...... ……. .3 Secretary……………….....Dave Clinton Contests ................ …….….3 Chief Engineer……….. .Fred Lockhart Clinic……………..……..…4 Directors……………… ...Bill Garvey (’20) ……………………….. .Bryan Miller (‘20) Editor’s Notes. ….….....….10 ……………………… ….Roger St. Peter (’19) Members ............... …….....10 …………………………...Gary Mangelinkx (‘19) Memories .............. ………...4 Potpourri ............... ..…..…...6 ON THE COVER: Northbound Montrealer in Ride the Rails ....... ………..11 Georgia, Vermont. Summer 1981. (DNC photo) Running Extra....... .….……11 2 weirdest, or the one you remember most of FORM 19 ORDERS AMTRAK’S PROMOTIONAL SLOGANS over the years. You’ve heard them on the Radio; saw them on TV or on posters and in train stations; there BUDGET COMMITTEE MEETING were many of them the past 48 years. Use the contest entry forms available on the old display Monday, April 22nd 8 p.m. case inside the train room door or any piece of APRIL B.O.D. MEETING th paper but don’t forget your name. Should be fun to Monday, April 29 8 p.m. make a whole poster of them for 48 years of DECODER/EQUIPMENT TUNE-UP CLINIC progress? nd Thursday, May 2 8 p.m. MAY BUSINESS MEETING th Monday, May 6 8 p.m. Fred Lockhart MAY NEWSLETTER DEADLINE th Saturday, May 25 MAY B.O.D. To start off this month I will give you all my Monday, 27th 8 p.m. progress report for the railroad. First off, the new staging yard is now up and running! Some of the features are eight storage tracks ranging from CONTESTS approximately sixteen to twenty feet in length and each track can be shut off so as not to overload the circuit breakers, but to also quiet sound Congratulations to Will Baker on winning this locomotives. Also, indicator LED’s to month’s 50/50 raffle! indicate when a train is about a foot away from the bumpers, as the last At this month’s Business Meeting, we had a record three feet of the yard is under the 21 entries for Al Taylor’s “word-find” puzzle “Steam Boston Division and is difficult to see Loco 6”, with some unusual part names; obviously, (LED’s will be installed when Boston a favorite type of contest: benchwork is in place); a model board with LED’s to show turnout position Steve Wintermeier Bob Farrenkropf and if track power is on, similar to Cedar Hill Bryan Miller Ron Clough passenger terminal model board. We also added Barry Doland Jim South detection on the lead track because when the Fred Lockhart Dan Peterson existing Boston/Great Lakes staging yard is Will Baker Jim Ferris replaced with the new sections of the railroad, Al McCarty Bill Garvey about two thirds of the ramp will be hidden; it is a Skip Burton Paul Cutler, Jr. long grade and it will be beneficial to know if your Savery Moore Doug Buchanan train is still making progress up the grade. We will Paul Cutler III Joe Dumas have to run some tests to see how much power a “Gunny” Roger St. Peter train will need for different length trains. This yard Don Pierce will be an asset during shows for the extra storage Drawing was for the just released Bowser and capacity. When all the new work is done, this Walthers New Haven Boxcars and here’re the staging yard will be a walk in, no crawling on the winners: floor to get in to it. The scenery work in Cedar Hill Bryan Miller, Bill Garvey, Paul Cutler III continues, some re-worked rolling stock has been Congrats and thanks to all for playing the game! transformed into yard buildings, roads are being th added and of course ballasting continues--it never For MAY, in celebration of Amtrak’s 48 ends does it? There is still a lot to do in Cedar Hill, Anniversary, everyone wins even if it’s just a piece but each month it is looking better. Scenery work is of cake! For the contest: Give your favorite, 3 also being done in White River Jct. (the wye area). dressed in B&M maroon. This unit had a motor over That is why you will see more of the backdrop one truck with “rubber band” drive from the motor to removed in that area. Not far from White River Jct., the gear powering both axles. It did have “all-wheel” around the curve near the crossing with the Larson pickup, though! He used the basic DH123D and Branch, work is being done to create a base for was successful in hard-wiring and replacing the scenery to be finished in that area, as it has been headlight with an LED. Doodle Bug runs very untouched for a long time. The benchwork for the slowly, though. Boston Division that will be in the staging area is being built off the railroad, near the Model Shop. Paul Agnew brought two ECL locos. The first, an Roadbed is in progress and trackwork has been Athearn GP50, which had burned out a sound started; the Electrical Committee will wire it and decoder. He found the problem and replaced the after that we will install it. It will sit idle until all the decoder in the loco. The second was also an new work is done and connected to it, but we need Athearn but one of the old GP38s. So old, that the that level done because above that will be motor mount had dried out and the motor was loose benchwork for the narrow gauge railroad. Going in the chassis! He installed a new mount and away forward, I have a couple of small jobs for the the unit went, ready for another 100,000 miles! Benchwork Committee to do and then they will be ready to start the benchwork for the new sections Paul Cutler III brought a Bochmann Spectrum that will replace the Boston/Great Lakes staging, unlettered 4-4-0, which the owner wanted lettered which by the way will be re-located and re-used to for B&M. He installed a TCS “Wow Sound” decoder accommodate the end of the line and make for #121, with a B-MB4 “motherboard” in the tender. All “continuous running” for shows. Work will also be worked out successfully. starting on adding a track to reach a new trolley barn that will be located near the Moxie factory, this Ye Ed installed a DH165AO into an old Atlas is something that was planned years ago but never “Classic” RS3, decorated in Rutland’s nice green got built; it will complete that end of the trolley with yellow striping. The decoder is a direct infrastructure on that end of the trolley. There are a replacement for the factory board. I replaced the lot of members that have been involved in all the bulbs with 3mm LED’s at each end. Many of the work mentioned above, but I hesitate to try to new decoders are coming with on-board current- mention everyone by name because if I leave resistors, so that it is not necessary to add resistors someone out, well, no one likes to be left out. for lighting, if you’re using a 1.5v mini-bulb or an Thanks to everyone for all your efforts. LED for each direction. I found that it is very That is it for this month. As usual, your questions important, though, to press the wires into the “wire and comments are always welcome. channels” in the weights at each end, as there is no Fred Lockhart extra clearance between the top of the weights and Chief Engineer the body shell. In fact, I had to Dremel both channels larger, as the heat shrink over the ends of DCC & EQUIPMENT TUNE-UP CLINIC the LEDs was thicker than the original light wires. I used tape over the top of the weights to keep the wires in the channels. Dan Peterson brought an “original” P2K E8 decorated in C&NW’s handsome green and yellow Thanks to Paul Cutler III for all his assistance with scheme. Without a decoder plug, these units the clinic. Our next Clinic will be Thursday, May nd became “hard-wire jobs”. He used the NCE D135R, 2 . Sign-up sheet on Bulletin Board. All are which is a 4-function decoder. He needed the extra welcome! functions because of the MARS light.
Recommended publications
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its

    GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its

    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
  • Tickets and Fares

    Tickets and Fares

    New York Fares Connecticut Fares Effective January 1, 2013 New York State Stations/ Zones Fares to GCT/ Harlem-125th Street Sample fares to GCT/ Harlem-125th Street Select Intermediate Fares to Greenwich On-board fares are indicated in red. On-board fares are indicated in red. On-board fares are indicated in red. 10-Trip One-Way Monthly Weekly 10-Trip 10-Trip One -Way One -Way 10-Trip One-Way Destination Monthly Weekly 10-Trip Zone Harlem Line Hudson Line Zone Senior/ Senior/ Stations Monthly Weekly 10-Trip 10-Trip Senior/ One -Way One -Way Senior/ Commutation Commutation Peak Off -Peak Disabled/ Peak Off -Peak Disabled/ Commutation Commutation Peak Off -Peak Disabled/ Peak Off -Peak Disabled/ Origin Station(s) Station Commutation Commutation Intermediate One-Way Medicare Medicare Medicare Medicare $6.75 $5.00 $3.25 1 Harlem -125th Street Harlem -125th Street 1 $154.00 $49.25 $67.50 $42.50 $32.50 Greenwich INTRASTATE CONNECTICUT $13.00 $11.00 $3.25 Melrose Yankees-E. 153rd Street Cos Cob $12.00 $9.00 $6.00 $2.50 $263.00 $84.25 $120.00 $76.50 $60.00 Stamford thru Rowayton Greenwich $55.50 $17.25 $21.25 Tremont Morris Heights $7.50 $5.75 $3.75 Riverside $18.00 $15.00 $6.00 $9.00 2 $178.00 $55.50 $75.00 $49.00 $37.50 Old Greenwich Tickets Fordham University Heights $14.00 $12.00 $3.75 $2.50 Glenbrook thru New Canaan Greenwich $55.50 $17.25 $21.25 Botanical Garden Marble Hill 2 $9.25 $7.00 $4.50 $9.00 Williams Bridge Spuyten Duyvil 3 $204.00 $65.25 $92.50 $59.50 $45.00 Stamford $15.00 $13.00 $4.50 $3.25 Woodlawn Riverdale Noroton Heights
  • Northeast Corridor Chase, Maryland January 4, 1987

    Northeast Corridor Chase, Maryland January 4, 1987

    PB88-916301 NATIONAL TRANSPORT SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT REAR-END COLLISION OF AMTRAK PASSENGER TRAIN 94, THE COLONIAL AND CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION FREIGHT TRAIN ENS-121, ON THE NORTHEAST CORRIDOR CHASE, MARYLAND JANUARY 4, 1987 NTSB/RAR-88/01 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipient's Catalog No. NTSB/RAR-88/01 . PB88-916301 Title and Subtitle Railroad Accident Report^ 5-Report Date Rear-end Collision of'*Amtrak Passenger Train 949 the January 25, 1988 Colonial and Consolidated Rail Corporation Freight -Performing Organization Train ENS-121, on the Northeast Corridor, Code Chase, Maryland, January 4, 1987 -Performing Organization 7. "Author(s) ~~ Report No. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.Work Unit No. National Transportation Safety Board Bureau of Accident Investigation .Contract or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20594 k3-Type of Report and Period Covered 12.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Iroad Accident Report lanuary 4, 1987 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, D. C. 20594 1*+.Sponsoring Agency Code 15-Supplementary Notes 16 Abstract About 1:16 p.m., eastern standard time, on January 4, 1987, northbound Conrail train ENS -121 departed Bay View yard at Baltimore, Mary1 and, on track 1. The train consisted of three diesel-electric freight locomotive units, all under power and manned by an engineer and a brakeman. Almost simultaneously, northbound Amtrak train 94 departed Pennsylvania Station in Baltimore. Train 94 consisted of two electric locomotive units, nine coaches, and three food service cars. In addition to an engineer, conductor, and three assistant conductors, there were seven Amtrak service employees and about 660 passengers on the train.
  • Regional Rail Service the Vermont Way

    Regional Rail Service the Vermont Way

    DRAFT Regional Rail Service The Vermont Way Authored by Christopher Parker and Carl Fowler November 30, 2017 Contents Contents 2 Executive Summary 4 The Budd Car RDC Advantage 5 Project System Description 6 Routes 6 Schedule 7 Major Employers and Markets 8 Commuter vs. Intercity Designation 10 Project Developer 10 Stakeholders 10 Transportation organizations 10 Town and City Governments 11 Colleges and Universities 11 Resorts 11 Host Railroads 11 Vermont Rail Systems 11 New England Central Railroad 12 Amtrak 12 Possible contract operators 12 Dispatching 13 Liability Insurance 13 Tracks and Right-of-Way 15 Upgraded Track 15 Safety: Grade Crossing Upgrades 15 Proposed Standard 16 Upgrades by segment 16 Cost of Upgrades 17 Safety 19 Platforms and Stations 20 Proposed Stations 20 Existing Stations 22 Construction Methods of New Stations 22 Current and Historical Precedents 25 Rail in Vermont 25 Regional Rail Service in the United States 27 New Mexico 27 Maine 27 Oregon 28 Arizona and Rural New York 28 Rural Massachusetts 28 Executive Summary For more than twenty years various studies have responded to a yearning in Vermont for a regional passenger rail service which would connect Vermont towns and cities. This White Paper, commissioned by Champ P3, LLC reviews the opportunities for and obstacles to delivering rail service at a rural scale appropriate for a rural state. Champ P3 is a mission driven public-private partnership modeled on the Eagle P3 which built Denver’s new commuter rail network. Vermont’s two railroads, Vermont Rail System and Genesee & Wyoming, have experience hosting and operating commuter rail service utilizing Budd cars.
  • Chicago-South Bend-Toledo-Cleveland-Erie-Buffalo-Albany-New York Frequency Expansion Report – Discussion Draft 2 1

    Chicago-South Bend-Toledo-Cleveland-Erie-Buffalo-Albany-New York Frequency Expansion Report – Discussion Draft 2 1

    Chicago-South Bend-Toledo-Cleveland-Erie-Buffalo- Albany-New York Frequency Expansion Report DISCUSSION DRAFT (Quantified Model Data Subject to Refinement) Table of Contents 1. Project Background: ................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Early Study Efforts and Initial Findings: ................................................................................................ 5 3. Background Data Collection Interviews: ................................................................................................ 6 4. Fixed-Facility Capital Cost Estimate Range Based on Existing Studies: ............................................... 7 5. Selection of Single Route for Refined Analysis and Potential “Proxy” for Other Routes: ................ 9 6. Legal Opinion on Relevant Amtrak Enabling Legislation: ................................................................... 10 7. Sample “Timetable-Format” Schedules of Four Frequency New York-Chicago Service: .............. 12 8. Order-of-Magnitude Capital Cost Estimates for Platform-Related Improvements: ............................ 14 9. Ballpark Station-by-Station Ridership Estimates: ................................................................................... 16 10. Scoping-Level Four Frequency Operating Cost and Revenue Model: .................................................. 18 11. Study Findings and Conclusions: .........................................................................................................
  • Sustainable Communities in the Bronx: Melrose

    Sustainable Communities in the Bronx: Melrose

    Morrisania Air Rights Housing Development 104 EXISTING STATIONS: Melrose SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES IN THE BRONX 105 EXISITING STATIONS MELROSE 104 EXISTING STATIONS: Melrose SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES IN THE BRONX 105 MELROSE FILLING IN THE GAPS INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION SYNOPSIS HISTORY The Melrose Metro-North Station is located along East 162nd Street between Park and Courtlandt Av- The history of the Melrose area is particularly im- enues at the edge of the Morrisania, Melrose and portant not only because it is representative of the Concourse Village neighborhoods of the Bronx. It is story of the South Bronx, but because it shaped the located approximately midway on the 161st /163rd physical form and features which are Melrose today. Street corridor spanning from Jerome Avenue on the The area surrounding the Melrose station was orig- west and Westchester Avenue on the east. This cor- inally part of the vast Morris family estate. In the ridor was identified in PlaNYC as one of the Bronx’s mid-nineteenth century, the family granted railroad three primary business districts, and contains many access through the estate to the New York and Har- regional attractions and civic amenities including lem Rail Road (the predecessor to the Harlem Line). Yankee Stadium, the Bronx County Courthouse, and In the 1870s, this part of the Bronx was annexed into the Bronx Hall of Justice. A large portion of the sta- New York City, and the Third Avenue Elevated was tion area is located within the Melrose Commons soon extended to the area. Elevated and subway Urban Renewal Area, and has seen tremendous mass transit prompted large population growth in growth and reinvestment in the past decades, with the neighborhood, and soon 5-6 story tenements Courtlandt Corners, Boricua College, Boricua Village replaced one- and two-family homes.
  • November/December 2020

    November/December 2020

    Nov. – Dec. 2020 Issue Number 865 Editor’s Comments The next Membership meeting will be a virtual Zoom meeting at 7:30 p.m. Thursday, January 7. Inside This Issue If you know someone who wants to view the meeting, either a visiting railfan or an interested person, it is okay to pass the Editor’s Comments 1 link onto them (but please do not send to large groups). Inside This Issue 1 Watch for an email with meeting sign-in details. Club Officers 1 President’s Comments You will notice that this issue is a bit longer than our normal. 2 We decided that it was time to better coordinate the issue Amtrak News 2 month with the calendar, so this issue is a one-time combina- Pictures from Many of the CRRC Steam Trips 3-6 tion of two months of H & M. In January, we will return to our typical monthly issue of 16 pages. In the meantime, Virtual Railfanning in Time of COVID-19 7 please enjoy this month’s articles and its many photos. Santa Fe, Ohio? 8-9 Happy Holidays! Let’s all have a safe and happy New Year! A Visit to Kentucky Steam Heritage Corporation 10-15 Railfan’s Diary 16-21 Do you have thoughts and questions that you’d like to Steam News 22-27 share in future Headlight & Markers? Meeting Notice 28 Send electronic submissions to: [email protected] Perhaps you’ve thought of submitting an article or two --- now would be a great time to do so! Dave Puthoff Club Officers Club Email: [email protected].
  • Brewster Yard & Southeast Station and Parking Improvements

    Brewster Yard & Southeast Station and Parking Improvements

    Brewster Yard & Southeast Station and Parking Improvements Capital Engineering - Shops and Yards & Strategic Facilities Date: February 2020 Metro-North Railroad Program Goals: Brewster Yard & Southeast Station Parking Improvements Currently Brewster train yard is at capacity and cannot accommodate the future fleet and operations required to support Metro-North (MNR) Harlem Line long-term ridership growth. MNR sets forth to accomplish the following goals to meet the demand: Relocate the existing Southeast Station parking into a new parking facility, east of the station within the Metro-North’s, 52-acre property: Improve customer service and traffic circulation with more convenient, expanded parking and intermodal access. Expand and modernize Brewster Yard to support long-term ridership growth: Extend the existing yard to the north into the current Southeast Parking footprint after the new parking facility is complete. Improve Southeast Station’s overpass, platform, and canopy to enhance its aesthetics, safety and amenities. 2 Three-Phased Program Approach Phase I Parking and Access Improvements Brewster Yard Station Improvements Phase II North Yard CONSTRUCTION / Construction MAINTENANCE ACCESS ROAD PEDSTRIAN ACCESS East Parcel Phase III South Yard Reconfiguration 3 PHASE I – Parking Facility, Access and Station Improvements Major project elements: Construct a new 1,000 plus - space garage to replace the existing surface parking lots at Southeast Station. Construct a new fly-over bridge that will connect Independent Way to the new parking facility. Extend the existing pedestrian overpass to the new parking facility. Pedestrian Access from the parking facility to the northern end of island platform is being planned; existing track curvature may have an impact.
  • Boston-Montreal High Speed Rail Project

    Boston-Montreal High Speed Rail Project

    Boston to Montreal High- Speed Rail Planning and Feasibility Study Phase I Final Report prepared for Vermont Agency of Transportation New Hampshire Department of Transportation Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation and Construction prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas with Cambridge Systematics Fitzgerald and Halliday HNTB, Inc. KKO and Associates April 2003 final report Boston to Montreal High-Speed Rail Planning and Feasibility Study Phase I prepared for Vermont Agency of Transportation New Hampshire Department of Transportation Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation and Construction prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas with Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Fitzgerald and Halliday HNTB, Inc. KKO and Associates April 2003 Boston to Montreal High-Speed Rail Feasibility Study Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... ES-1 E.1 Background and Purpose of the Study ............................................................... ES-1 E.2 Study Overview...................................................................................................... ES-1 E.3 Ridership Analysis................................................................................................. ES-8 E.4 Government and Policy Issues............................................................................. ES-12 E.5 Conclusion..............................................................................................................
  • Ms 711 Rg 1 National Railroad Passenger Corporation / Amtrak : James L

    Ms 711 Rg 1 National Railroad Passenger Corporation / Amtrak : James L

    MS 711 RG 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION / AMTRAK : JAMES L. LARSON OPERATIONS AND PLANNING FILES 1971-2003, bulk 1976-2003. 16.5 linear ft. Original order has been maintained. The James L. Larson files are arranged in the following series: 1. REPORTS 2. CHRONOLOGICAL FILES 3. LAWSUITS PROVENANCE Gift of Mrs. Mary Larson (387-2090), 2011. HISTORICAL INFORMATION James Llewellyn Larson was born on March 27, 1935 in Madison, Wisconsin to Ruth (Thurber) and LeRoy Larson. While attending high school, Mr. Larson spent many hours at the Chicago and North Western Railway Company's interlocking tower in Madison, Wisconsin where he learned telegraphy. He went to work for the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, and Pacific Railroad in 1952 as an agent, telegrapher, and tower operator. In 1953, Mr. Larson began working for the Chicago and North Western Transportation Company as a telegrapher, then as a wire changer. During his 20-year tenure with C&NW, he worked in the Operating Department, was a Train Dispatcher from 1957 to 1959, and then spent eight years as an Assistant Trainmaster and a Trainmaster. He was a System Rules Examiner from 1966 to 1968, an Assistant Division Superintendent from 1968 to 1969, Assistant Superintendent -Transportation from 1969 to 1972, where he managed Operations Center in Chicago. From 1972 to 1973, he was an Assistant Division Master of Transportation on the Twin Cities Division. Mr. Larson was recruited by Amtrak in 1973. During his 25-year tenure with Amtrak he served as Manager of Station Operations, Director of Personnel, Assistant Vice President of Administrative Staff, and Assistant Vice President of Contracts.
  • Ii Ii Will There Be Two Daily Amtrak Trains in the Cleveland-Pittsburgh Corridor? Oarp Continues Work for New Services!

    Ii Ii Will There Be Two Daily Amtrak Trains in the Cleveland-Pittsburgh Corridor? Oarp Continues Work for New Services!

    II II JUNE 1989 OHIO ASSOCIATION OF RAILROAO PASSENGERS ISSUE #83 WILL THERE BE TWO DAILY AMTRAK TRAINS IN THE CLEVELAND-PITTSBURGH CORRIDOR? OARP CONTINUES WORK FOR NEW SERVICES! A Cleveland- Pittsburgh Update by KEN PRENDERGAST, Coordinator of OARP's new Cleveland­ Pittsburgh Corridor Special Project ! This is the first column I am writing as Coordinator for ,I II the newly-established Cleveland-Pittsburgh Corridor Pro­ 1 1 II ject. At the OARP Board Meeting on May 20th, the Board II :, approved the creation of an OARP Special Project for the II II CLE-PIT Corridor, and whereby I would be the Coordinator I 'I for this Project. I appreciate this opportunity to lead this worthwhile and successful effort! This new Special Project will not drain on OARP's Treasury. Expenses will li 1i II I be incurred only as Project-specific contributions are re­ I' ceived. OARP has made requests for contributions ranging II II :1 I from $500 ot $4000 from various on-line communities and businesses. As the grant money comes in, Project expenses il will be incurred, but not before. If you have ideas of ,,I who should be approached for grant money, let me know. : ~ Enough talk of what we're going to do. I would like to update some of what OARP and Amtrak have been doing in the last two months ... Foremost, the Amtrak study on the PENNSYLVANIAN extension is essentially complete. However, it has not been released to the public as of this writing. I am disappointed that Amtrak is dragging their feet on the completion and release of the study's final results.
  • Grand Central to Greenwich Connecticut Train Schedule

    Grand Central to Greenwich Connecticut Train Schedule

    Grand Central To Greenwich Connecticut Train Schedule Penetrant and slimier Piotr maturates so lankly that Carroll denaturises his Pavlov. Worried Niven signifiedintertangle easterly. some spoilage after boneless Marlin lowers commendable. Frumentaceous Sawyere Walk right onto scarsdale and great northern is grand central to greenwich schedule from? It crosses over on their commuter and prices tend to. Oregon health and the best part of town offers many other landmarks, harlem line as connecticut to grand central commuter trains on train schedule grand central terminal and. Other entrances at every Terminal authorities be closed for health precautions. The Night Strangers A Novel. Saturday schedule grand central to greenwich station building is a map of connecticut? List of Metro-North Railroad stations Wikipedia. All train schedule from greenwich, as a gradual return to present your account confirmation email for grand central depot, with them and terminate trains already stop between mt. Stamford Connecticut AmtrakMetro North Station Washington Blvd and South commercial Street Stamford CT 06902 Train Station. Anything that can raise their income levels and job growth in the greater Danbury community like going to flash the growth of seven state as a powerful and reduce the internal burden in Fairfield County. Ever be used in line train serve grand central commuter service. The vastness of it out of dragging around new haven by march day school in public schools aim to. Does Metro North either to Greenwich CT? If you are page for example great deal on but train tickets or just want extra harm to stretch to, consider traveling on Sunday instead, mold it tends to strict the least crowded day book the week.