DOCSLIB.ORG

EWSLETT Patrick Abegg, Editor • P.O

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

•y Boston & Maine Railroad Historical Som EWSLETT Patrick Abegg, Editor • P.O. Box 418 • Gloucester, MA 01930 • Email: [email protected] Visit the B&MRRHS on the web at http://come.to/bmrrhs Meeting/Membership Telephone Number (978) 454-3600 July-August 2002 Opinions expressed in the signed columns or letters of this Newsletter are those of their respective authors and not necessarily represent the opinions of the Society, its officers or members with respect to any particular subject discussed in those columns. The inclusion of commercial products or services in this Newsletter is for the convenience of the mem• bership only, and in no way constitutes an endorsement of said products or services by the Society or any of its officers or directors, nor will the Society be responsible for the per• formance of said commercial suppliers. We reserve the right to edit all material, either due to length or content, submitted for publication. — B&MRRHS CALENDAR — AUGUST NO MEETING FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST SEPTEMBER 14, 2002 Rick Hurst will present railroading in and around Chicago, the Boston & Maine and Bangor & Aroostook in the 1970's. OCTOBER 12, 2002 Bob Poore will present a program on the Maine Central. NOVEMBER 9, 2002 Frank Ellis will be giving a presentation on the Boston & Maine. DECEMBER 14, 2002 Members night NOMINATIONS FOR OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS Nominations for elective office in the B&MRRHS are now open to members in good standing. Closing date for nominations to appear on the ballot is August 15, 2002. Closing date for Nominations from the floor is October 12, 2002 at the Society's BOD/Members meeting. Please send all Nominee's names to the Deny PO Box in care of "Nominations." We urge all members in good standing to consider running for office in the Society. This is YOUR organization and needs your input. Get involved!! DIRECTIONS TO THE LOWELL MEETING PLACE—at the traffic light near the Mogan Center, take a right or left depending on which way you come down French St., go past the little guard shack (Parking lot is on right-Boarding House Park is to the left), Walk over the trolley tracks and bridge. Into the courtyard, bear to the right and go to the end. The doorway will be lighted. Also look for signs. VISITORS MUST PARK IN THE LOT ON FRENCH STREET. NO PARKING IS ALLOWED IN THE COURTYARD. To Htes. 3*498 B&MRRHS Newsletter Page 1 MEMBERSHIP INFO SOCIETY OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND STAFF President Paul T. Kosciolek Membership: Vice President Mike Basile Dues payment only should be sent to: Treasurer Allan Klatsky B&MRRHS-Dept. M Secretary Buddy Winiarz P.O. Box 9116 Clerk Richard Nichols Lowell, MA 01852 Newsletter: Board Of Directors B&MRRHS P.O. Box 418 James Nigzus, Jr Gloucester, MA 01930 Brian Bollinger E-mail: [email protected] Russell Munroe, Jr. Daniel Hyde Business Address: John Goodwin B&MRRHS Wayne M. Gagnon P.O. Box 469 Patrick Abegg Deny, NH 03038 George "Sandy" Shepherd E-mail: [email protected] (Please note change of e-mail Buddy Winiarz address) Alternate Directors Which address should you use? For membership payments, use the membership box in Lowell. For any correspondence concern• Ellis Walker ing the Newsletter, use the Newsletter box in Gloucester. Allan Klatsky Everything else should go to the Deny address. This includes cata• log orders and correspondence with the Archives, Historian, Bulletin, and Board of Directors. As always, include a SASE or Staff postage if you want a reply to your correspondence. Historian Vacant Please remember to remit your dues within 90 days—after Membership Secretary Buddy Winiarz 90 days you will he removed from the mailing list Check your Archives Chairman Frederick N. Nowell HI Newsletter for the RED DOT...this is the last item you will Show Coordinator James Nigzus, Jr. receive from the Society. Program Chairman Vacant Return payment in the return envelope with your check or Bulletin Technical Assistant David A. Fletcher money order—DO NOT send cash as the Society will not be Bulletin Production Asst Brian Bollinger held responsible if lost Make checks payable to: B&MRRHS. Bulletin Distribution John A. Goodwin If you change your address please let the Society know by Newsletter Editor Patrick Abegg snail mafl (USPS) or e-mail. When you do not let us know it Modelers Notes Bruce Bowden, costs extra for postage.—the first mailing, the return postage Robert Warren due and a second mailing to the correct address. Three mail• Model Projects Coordinator Vacant ing payments to one person. Bulletin Editor Andrew Wilson Layout And Art Director John Alan Roderick EMAIL Contributing Editor Craig Delia Penna, George H. Drury Due to a slight problem with AOL, I am reverting back to the old E-Mail address of: [email protected] This is for general information of the Society and member• ship status only. Archival and historical information should be sent to the Archives for now. Please go to the Society's web site PROGRAM CHAIRPERSON for other addresses. NEEDED The Society is still in need of a Program A REMINDER... Chairperson to plan presentations and arrange guests for the monthly meetings. This is not a particularly Members are reminded to return any material that they may have borrowed from the Society once they are finished with it. difficult job, but is so much better when it's done by It becomes very easy over time to forget that something that one individual rather than by committee. Anyone you have is borrowed rather than something that you own - or interested should contact the B&MRRHS at Box 469, whom you borrowed it from. This will allow us to maintain the Deny, NH 03038 or via e-mail. Society's material for the benefit of all members. Page 2 B&MRRHS Newsletter l&IRRHS BOARD OF DIRECTORS MINUTES February 9,2002 $3,486.96 and closed at $3,232.05 for a loss he has not heard anything from Hobo Boott Mills Conference Room of $254.91. Railroad. Lowell, Mass. Clerk's report: Written report was accept• B&MRRHS Society Show: Nigzus asked ed by the Directors as submitted by Nichols. to step down as co-chair of the project. In attendance: Michael Basile, Paul Newsletter Editor: Abegg reported that he Chairman Kosciolek asked for a co-chairper• Kosciolek, Dan Hyde, Ellis Walker, Rick has been practicing with new software appli• son. There were no volunteers so the show Nowell, Jim Nigzus, Pat Abegg; Allen cations, and will prepare the basic layout. has been scrubbed for 2002. Klatsky, John Goodwin. Archives Committee: Nowell reported that a meeting was held on January 17,2002. New Business Items: Reports Leroy Hutchinson collection was being cata• Canal Days: Park Ranger Jim Roberts logued along with part two of the Sam addressed the board to provide a speaker on President's report: Past President Vaughn collection. Nowell will be the guest August 10, 2002 to discuss the competition Kosciolek turned over the gavel to President speaker at the Old Wheels Club-B&M between the canals & the railroads. Our soci• Basile. President Basile dedicated the Retirees to be held on May 15, 2002. The ety was also asked to open the rail car for February board meeting to Past President Harry Frye collection will be worked on in that day as well. Dan Hyde and Allen Donald S. Robinson who had passed away the spring. Klatsky will open the rail car for that day. on January 16, 2002. A moment of silence 410 Committee: Nigzus reported that John Goodwin was asked to speak for the was called in his memory. A blank set of there will be an indoor window work session lecture. minutes was also entered in Don's memory. planned in March. Sales of old B&M Bulletins: Nigzus President Basile called for nominations Models Committee: Boston & Lowell brought to the attention that our supplies of for the vacancy of Chairman. Paul cars will be coming from Third Rail graphics old bulletins are dwindling. Motion that any Kosciolek's name was nominated and around the beginning of March. Bulletins produced before vol. 19 no. 1 will accepted by Kosciolek. Motion made that Shows Committee: Nigzus reported that not be sold to any dealers or members who the Secretary cast one unanimous ballot for the Springfield show brought in total sales of are purchasing these bulletins in large bulk Paul Kosciolek to be elected to the position $2,750.00 breakdown as follows: $800.00 numbers and that the sales will be governed of Chairman. Motion carried. Bulletins, $650.00-books, $300.00 videos, at the discretion of the board of directors. Treasurer's report: Klatsky reported that car kits-$300.00 Motion carried. as of January 25, 2002 the following Program Committee: Carl Lindblatt was Next meeting will be held on March amounts are as follows: savings account- confirmed for the May meeting. 9,2002. $34,921.09, checking account-$5,058.96, Old Business Items: Tucker-Anthony account opened at Hobo Railroad trip: Nigzus reported that March 9,2002 Morion that the secretary cast one unanimous Boott Mills Conference Room ballot for Ellis Walker as Clerk. Motion car• Fox and associates: donations to outside Lowell, Mass. ried. Chair will also send a letter to Nichols organizations are not on the table for discus• for a job well done. sion at this point. In attendance: Michael Basile, Paul Newsletter Editor Abegg sent Newsletter Webmaster Report: Our society will main• Kosciolek, Sandy Shepperd,Russ Munroe to Roderick. He is getting more proficient tain the confidentiality of our membership.
Recommended publications
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its

    GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its

    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
  • Northeast Corridor Chase, Maryland January 4, 1987

    Northeast Corridor Chase, Maryland January 4, 1987

    PB88-916301 NATIONAL TRANSPORT SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT REAR-END COLLISION OF AMTRAK PASSENGER TRAIN 94, THE COLONIAL AND CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION FREIGHT TRAIN ENS-121, ON THE NORTHEAST CORRIDOR CHASE, MARYLAND JANUARY 4, 1987 NTSB/RAR-88/01 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipient's Catalog No. NTSB/RAR-88/01 . PB88-916301 Title and Subtitle Railroad Accident Report^ 5-Report Date Rear-end Collision of'*Amtrak Passenger Train 949 the January 25, 1988 Colonial and Consolidated Rail Corporation Freight -Performing Organization Train ENS-121, on the Northeast Corridor, Code Chase, Maryland, January 4, 1987 -Performing Organization 7. "Author(s) ~~ Report No. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.Work Unit No. National Transportation Safety Board Bureau of Accident Investigation .Contract or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20594 k3-Type of Report and Period Covered 12.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Iroad Accident Report lanuary 4, 1987 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, D. C. 20594 1*+.Sponsoring Agency Code 15-Supplementary Notes 16 Abstract About 1:16 p.m., eastern standard time, on January 4, 1987, northbound Conrail train ENS -121 departed Bay View yard at Baltimore, Mary1 and, on track 1. The train consisted of three diesel-electric freight locomotive units, all under power and manned by an engineer and a brakeman. Almost simultaneously, northbound Amtrak train 94 departed Pennsylvania Station in Baltimore. Train 94 consisted of two electric locomotive units, nine coaches, and three food service cars. In addition to an engineer, conductor, and three assistant conductors, there were seven Amtrak service employees and about 660 passengers on the train.
  • PRIIA Report

    PRIIA Report

    Pursuant to Section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-432, Division B): Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations Covering the Quarter Ended June, 2020 (Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2020) Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation Published August 2020 Table of Contents (Notes follow on the next page.) Financial Table 1 (A/B): Short-Term Avoidable Operating Costs (Note 1) Table 2 (A/B): Fully Allocated Operating Cost covered by Passenger-Related Revenue Table 3 (A/B): Long-Term Avoidable Operating Loss (Note 1) Table 4 (A/B): Adjusted Loss per Passenger- Mile Table 5: Passenger-Miles per Train-Mile On-Time Performance (Table 6) Test No. 1 Change in Effective Speed Test No. 2 Endpoint OTP Test No. 3 All-Stations OTP Train Delays Train Delays - Off NEC Table 7: Off-NEC Host Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Table 8: Off-NEC Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Train Delays - On NEC Table 9: On-NEC Total Host and Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Other Service Quality Table 10: Customer Satisfaction Indicator (eCSI) Scores Table 11: Service Interruptions per 10,000 Train-Miles due to Equipment-related Problems Table 12: Complaints Received Table 13: Food-related Complaints Table 14: Personnel-related Complaints Table 15: Equipment-related Complaints Table 16: Station-related Complaints Public Benefits (Table 17) Connectivity Measure Availability of Other Modes Reference Materials Table 18: Route Descriptions Terminology & Definitions Table 19: Delay Code Definitions Table 20: Host Railroad Code Definitions Appendixes A.
  • Regional Rail Service the Vermont Way

    Regional Rail Service the Vermont Way

    DRAFT Regional Rail Service The Vermont Way Authored by Christopher Parker and Carl Fowler November 30, 2017 Contents Contents 2 Executive Summary 4 The Budd Car RDC Advantage 5 Project System Description 6 Routes 6 Schedule 7 Major Employers and Markets 8 Commuter vs. Intercity Designation 10 Project Developer 10 Stakeholders 10 Transportation organizations 10 Town and City Governments 11 Colleges and Universities 11 Resorts 11 Host Railroads 11 Vermont Rail Systems 11 New England Central Railroad 12 Amtrak 12 Possible contract operators 12 Dispatching 13 Liability Insurance 13 Tracks and Right-of-Way 15 Upgraded Track 15 Safety: Grade Crossing Upgrades 15 Proposed Standard 16 Upgrades by segment 16 Cost of Upgrades 17 Safety 19 Platforms and Stations 20 Proposed Stations 20 Existing Stations 22 Construction Methods of New Stations 22 Current and Historical Precedents 25 Rail in Vermont 25 Regional Rail Service in the United States 27 New Mexico 27 Maine 27 Oregon 28 Arizona and Rural New York 28 Rural Massachusetts 28 Executive Summary For more than twenty years various studies have responded to a yearning in Vermont for a regional passenger rail service which would connect Vermont towns and cities. This White Paper, commissioned by Champ P3, LLC reviews the opportunities for and obstacles to delivering rail service at a rural scale appropriate for a rural state. Champ P3 is a mission driven public-private partnership modeled on the Eagle P3 which built Denver’s new commuter rail network. Vermont’s two railroads, Vermont Rail System and Genesee & Wyoming, have experience hosting and operating commuter rail service utilizing Budd cars.
  • Amtrak Schedule from Nyc to Washington Dc

    Amtrak Schedule from Nyc to Washington Dc

    Amtrak Schedule From Nyc To Washington Dc Walker never pasquinades any deficit flounders consensually, is Sonnie containable and suasory enough? Sheffield still asphaltfrenzy stagnantly too vortically? while windswept Val illegalizes that cabman. Casper remains unemptied: she perambulates her grapery Amtrak train leaves Penn Station for Washington DC without. Read your nyc from washington, schedules may also. Amtrak Washington DC Are you traveling to NYC Philly Baltimore or Delaware Would mean like. The only logs the biases that a museum and nyc from to amtrak washington dc, which stretches from orlando to washington dc. Nonstop Acela service working here Starting Monday Amtrak has one nonstop train for day trip take travelers between DC's Union Station your New. How their Score a main Meal watching a Train Amtrak Blog. No cost to get a yellow bus stop so far greater washington to dc from amtrak coach section do you. Amtrak Train Visit Virginia's Blue Ridge. The 6 Most Scenic Amtrak Train Routes Oystercom. While the DC-to-NYC train will evolve at 430 pm and disclose at 705. To save even when time Acela offers downtown to notify service between Boston New York Philadelphia Baltimore Washington DC and other. Only logs the washington. Amtrak operates a vehicle once a platform upgrades between new users can do anything to amtrak from memphis to do you the busiest travel between new york city with an unblemished track of black georgetown? Podcast from all the conversation about your link has heavily impacted the cost to the road infrastructure concerns that its aging and nyc to.
  • Chicago-South Bend-Toledo-Cleveland-Erie-Buffalo-Albany-New York Frequency Expansion Report – Discussion Draft 2 1

    Chicago-South Bend-Toledo-Cleveland-Erie-Buffalo-Albany-New York Frequency Expansion Report – Discussion Draft 2 1

    Chicago-South Bend-Toledo-Cleveland-Erie-Buffalo- Albany-New York Frequency Expansion Report DISCUSSION DRAFT (Quantified Model Data Subject to Refinement) Table of Contents 1. Project Background: ................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Early Study Efforts and Initial Findings: ................................................................................................ 5 3. Background Data Collection Interviews: ................................................................................................ 6 4. Fixed-Facility Capital Cost Estimate Range Based on Existing Studies: ............................................... 7 5. Selection of Single Route for Refined Analysis and Potential “Proxy” for Other Routes: ................ 9 6. Legal Opinion on Relevant Amtrak Enabling Legislation: ................................................................... 10 7. Sample “Timetable-Format” Schedules of Four Frequency New York-Chicago Service: .............. 12 8. Order-of-Magnitude Capital Cost Estimates for Platform-Related Improvements: ............................ 14 9. Ballpark Station-by-Station Ridership Estimates: ................................................................................... 16 10. Scoping-Level Four Frequency Operating Cost and Revenue Model: .................................................. 18 11. Study Findings and Conclusions: .........................................................................................................
  • Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations

    Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations

    Pursuant to Section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-432, Division B): Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations Covering the Quarter Ended June, 2019 (Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2019) Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation Published August 2019 Table of Contents (Notes follow on the next page.) Financial Table 1 (A/B): Short-Term Avoidable Operating Costs (Note 1) Table 2 (A/B): Fully Allocated Operating Cost covered by Passenger-Related Revenue Table 3 (A/B): Long-Term Avoidable Operating Loss (Note 1) Table 4 (A/B): Adjusted Loss per Passenger- Mile Table 5: Passenger-Miles per Train-Mile On-Time Performance (Table 6) Test No. 1 Change in Effective Speed Test No. 2 Endpoint OTP Test No. 3 All-Stations OTP Train Delays Train Delays - Off NEC Table 7: Off-NEC Host Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Table 8: Off-NEC Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Train Delays - On NEC Table 9: On-NEC Total Host and Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Other Service Quality Table 10: Customer Satisfaction Indicator (eCSI) Scores Table 11: Service Interruptions per 10,000 Train-Miles due to Equipment-related Problems Table 12: Complaints Received Table 13: Food-related Complaints Table 14: Personnel-related Complaints Table 15: Equipment-related Complaints Table 16: Station-related Complaints Public Benefits (Table 17) Connectivity Measure Availability of Other Modes Reference Materials Table 18: Route Descriptions Terminology & Definitions Table 19: Delay Code Definitions Table 20: Host Railroad Code Definitions Appendixes A.
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting

    20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting

    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
  • November/December 2020

    November/December 2020

    Nov. – Dec. 2020 Issue Number 865 Editor’s Comments The next Membership meeting will be a virtual Zoom meeting at 7:30 p.m. Thursday, January 7. Inside This Issue If you know someone who wants to view the meeting, either a visiting railfan or an interested person, it is okay to pass the Editor’s Comments 1 link onto them (but please do not send to large groups). Inside This Issue 1 Watch for an email with meeting sign-in details. Club Officers 1 President’s Comments You will notice that this issue is a bit longer than our normal. 2 We decided that it was time to better coordinate the issue Amtrak News 2 month with the calendar, so this issue is a one-time combina- Pictures from Many of the CRRC Steam Trips 3-6 tion of two months of H & M. In January, we will return to our typical monthly issue of 16 pages. In the meantime, Virtual Railfanning in Time of COVID-19 7 please enjoy this month’s articles and its many photos. Santa Fe, Ohio? 8-9 Happy Holidays! Let’s all have a safe and happy New Year! A Visit to Kentucky Steam Heritage Corporation 10-15 Railfan’s Diary 16-21 Do you have thoughts and questions that you’d like to Steam News 22-27 share in future Headlight & Markers? Meeting Notice 28 Send electronic submissions to: [email protected] Perhaps you’ve thought of submitting an article or two --- now would be a great time to do so! Dave Puthoff Club Officers Club Email: [email protected].
  • Empire Corridor

    Empire Corridor

    U.S. System Summary: EMPIRE CORRIDOR Empire Corridor High-Speed Rail System (Source: NYSDOT) The Empire Corridor high-speed rail system is an es- rently in the Planning/Environmental stage with a vision tablished high-speed rail system containing 463 miles of to implement higher train speeds throughout the corridor. routes in two segments wholly contained within the State The entire route is part of the federally-designated Em- of New York, connecting New York City, Albany, Syra- pire Corridor High-Speed Rail Corridor. Operational and cuse, Rochester, Buffalo, and Niagara Falls. High-speed proposed high-speed rail service in the Empire Corridor intercity passenger rail service is currently Operational in high-speed rail system is based primarily on incremen- small portions of each segment, with maximum speeds up tal improvements to existing railroad rights-of-way, with to 110 mph. The entire 463-mile Empire Corridor is cur- maximum train speeds up to 125 mph being considered. U.S. HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM SUMMARY: EMPIRE CORRIDOR | 1 SY STEM DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY System Description The Empire Corridor high-speed rail system consists of two segments, as summarized below. Empire Corridor High-Speed Rail System Segment Characteristics Segment Description Distance Segment Status Designated Corridor? Segment Population New York City, NY, to Albany, NY 141 Miles Operational Yes 13,362,857 Albany, NY, to Niagara Falls, NY 322 Miles Planning/Environmental Yes 4,072,741 The New York City, NY, to Albany, NY, segment is 141 Transportation Study, which determined that new tech- miles in length and includes major communities such as nology over a new dedicated right-of-way would be neces- Poughkeepsie and Rhinecliff-Kingston along the route.
  • Presentation

    Presentation

    People Before Freight On-time trains on host railroads 3 LATEST REPORT CARD SIGNALS NEW GOLDEN AGE OF ON-TIME TRAINS 1 Canadian Pacific A 2 BNSF A 3 Union Pacific A 4 CSX A 5 Canadian National A 6 Norfolk Southern A Average grade for all host railroads: A 4 Amtrak National Network Passengers Continue to Experience Poor On-Time Performance 1 Canadian Pacific A 2 BNSF B 3 Union Pacific B- 4 CSX B- 5 Canadian National D- 6 Norfolk Southern F Average grade for all host railroads: C 5 Grading National Network routes on OTP 17 of 28 State-Supported Services Fail Class I Freight Percentage of trains on‐time State‐Supported Trains Route Host Railroads within 15 minutes Pass = 80% on‐time Hiawatha CP 96% Keystone (other hosts) 91% Capitol Corridor UP 89% New York ‐ Albany (other hosts) 89% Carl Sandburg / Illinois Zephyr BNSF 88% Ethan Allen Express CP 87% PASS Pere Marquette CSX, NS 84% Missouri River Runner UP 83% Springfield Shuttles (other hosts) 82% Downeaster (other hosts) 81% Hoosier State CSX 80% Pacific Surfliner BNSF, UP 78% Lincoln Service CN, UP 76% Blue Water NS, CN 75% Roanoke NS 75% Piedmont NS 74% Richmond / Newport News / Norfolk CSX, NS 74% San Joaquins BNSF, UP 73% Pennsylvanian NS 71% Adirondack CN, CP 70% FAIL New York ‐ Niagara Falls CSX 70% Vermonter (other hosts) 67% Cascades BNSF, UP 64% Maple Leaf CSX 64% Wolverine NS, CN 60% Heartland Flyer BNSF 58% Carolinian CSX, NS 51% Illini / Saluki CN 37% 6 Grading National Network routes on OTP 14 of 15 Long Distance Services Fail Class I Freight Percentage of trains on‐time Long
  • Boston-Montreal High Speed Rail Project

    Boston-Montreal High Speed Rail Project

    Boston to Montreal High- Speed Rail Planning and Feasibility Study Phase I Final Report prepared for Vermont Agency of Transportation New Hampshire Department of Transportation Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation and Construction prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas with Cambridge Systematics Fitzgerald and Halliday HNTB, Inc. KKO and Associates April 2003 final report Boston to Montreal High-Speed Rail Planning and Feasibility Study Phase I prepared for Vermont Agency of Transportation New Hampshire Department of Transportation Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation and Construction prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas with Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Fitzgerald and Halliday HNTB, Inc. KKO and Associates April 2003 Boston to Montreal High-Speed Rail Feasibility Study Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... ES-1 E.1 Background and Purpose of the Study ............................................................... ES-1 E.2 Study Overview...................................................................................................... ES-1 E.3 Ridership Analysis................................................................................................. ES-8 E.4 Government and Policy Issues............................................................................. ES-12 E.5 Conclusion..............................................................................................................