Operation and Safety of Tramways in Interaction with Public Space Analysis and Outcomes Detailed Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Operation and Safety of Tramways in Interaction with Public Space Analysis and Outcomes Detailed Report Operation and safety of tramways in interaction with public space Analysis and Outcomes Detailed Report COST is supported by the EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020 TU1103 Action final report September 2015 Operation and safety of tramways in interaction with public space Analysis and Outcomes Detailed Report Colophon Authors : COST TU1103 Chair : Laetitia FONTAINE - Service Technique des Remontées Mécaniques et des Transports Guidés (STRMTG – France). All participants of this COST Action have contributed to the report (see complete list at www.tram-urban-safety.eu and on chapter 7 of this report). Reviewers : Laetitia FONTAINE, Dominique BERTRAND, Carlos GAIVOTO, Giuseppe INTURRI, Marine MILLOT, Reddy MORLEY, Margarita NOVALES, Reinhold SCHROETER, Matus SUCHA, Manuel TEIXEIRA, David WALMSLEY, Johannes YEZBEK, Tony YOUNG. Version : Final Date : September, 2015 Contact : E-mail : [email protected] Website : www.tram-urban-safety.eu COST is supported by the EU Framework Programme TU1103 Action final report Horizon 2020 September 2015 COST Foreword This publication is supported by COST. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) is a pan-European intergo- vernmental framework. Its mission is to enable break-through scientific and techno- logical developments leading to new concepts and products and thereby contribute to strengthening Europe’s research and innovation capacities. It is the oldest and widest European intergovernmental network for cooperation in research. Established by the Ministerial Conference in November 1971, COST allows researchers, engineers and scho- lars to jointly develop their own ideas and take new initiatives across all fields of science and technology, while promoting multi- and interdisciplinary approaches. COST aims at fostering a better integration of less research intensive countries to the knowledge hubs of the European Research Area. The COST Association, an International not-forprofit Association under Belgian Law, integrates all management, governing and administrative functions necessary for the operation of the framework. The COST Association has currently 36 Member Countries. The funds provided by COST - less than 1 % of the total value of the projects - support the COST cooperation networks (COST Actions) through which, with EUR 30 million per year, more than 30 000 European scientists are involved in research having a total value which exceeds EUR 2 billion per year. This is the financial worth of the European added value, which COST achieves. A « bottom up approach » (the initiative of launching a COST Action comes from the European scientists themselves), « à la carte participation » (only countries interested in the Action participate), « equality of access » (participation is open also to the scientific communities of countries not belonging to the European Union) and « flexible structure » (easy implementation and light management of the research initia- tives) are the main characteristics of COST. As precursor of advanced multidisciplinary research COST has a very important role for the realisation of the European Research Area (ERA) anticipating and complementing the activities of the Framework Programmes, constituting a « bridge » towards the scientific communities of emerging countries, in- creasing the mobility of researchers across Europe and fostering the establishment of « Networks of Excellence » in many key scientific domains such as : Biomedicine and Molecular Biosciences ; Food and Agriculture ; Forests, their Products and Services ; Ma- terials, Physical and Nanosciences ; Chemistry and Molecular Sciences and Technologies ; Earth System Science and Environmental Management ; Information and Communica- tion Technologies ; Transport and Urban Development ; Individuals, Societies, Cultures and Health. It covers basic and more applied research and also addresses issues of pre-normative nature or of societal importance. For further information, http://www.cost.eu. COST is supported by the EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020. The Legal notice by COST Association : Neither the COST Association nor any person acting on its behalf is responsible for the use that might be made of the information contained in this publication. The COST Asso- ciation is not responsible for the external websites referred to in this publication. Operation and safety of tramways in interaction with public space - TU1103 page 2/211 Chair’s foreword on TU1103 Action – Operation and safety of tramways in interaction with public space Tramway and Light Rail Transit systems were reduced in the 1950s, but since 1990 they have been reintroduced or extended in many cities all over Europe. And therefore, the multiplication of lines has multiplied their interaction with other public space users. However in spite of this great spread, and even though accidents involving tramways usually have a big impact on the public’s emotions, the International Association of Public Transport (UITP) has demonstrated1 that statistics indisputably show that the tram is safer than private cars. A large proportion of accidents with trams are caused by third parties ignoring or overlooking rules and recommendations. Tramway/LRT urban insertion is the key interaction with third parties. Bad or non-adapted layouts can be reasons for bad understanding or disrespect. Common problems are encountered all over Europe and all tram networks are facing difficulties, having bad or good experiences, trying successful solutions, and all looking for improving more and more their safety level. Their experience could be useful for others, in order to get best practices and adapt them to their local context, thanks to access to the knowledge and experience. It is a pioneering work: it brings together for the first time in a study of this scale experts from across Europe and from across the spectrum of tramway involvement: operators, designers, researchers and national authorities, to share their experience on tram safety issues. The sharing of information, feedback, and experience is one of the best ways to improve tram safety in urban spaces. Urban insertion of tramways and LRTs is not an exact science but the sharing of ideas and practical solutions is a good way to give the best clues to a tram network to find the best layouts for one dangerous interaction place or a new insertion. This is what the TU1103 group has achieved here: to share with you our experiences. This is the aim of this final document: not guidance as such, but the sharing of suggestions, good experiences and best practices which TU1103 members can give to the profession on safe tram urban insertion. Laetitia FONTAINE, Chair of the COST Action TU1103 Service Technique des Remontées Mécaniques et des Transports Guidés (STRMTG – France) 1 UITP 2009 Core Brief “Light Rail Transit – a safe mean of transport” UITP information sheet Operation and safety of tramways in interaction with public space – TU1103 page 3/211 Availability of deliverables of the Action This Report is the deliverable for final Working Phases 2 and 3 of the TU1103 Action. It is a Public Report, and is available on the public part of the Action’s website www.tram-urban-safety.eu. The Report includes summaries of working group outcomes and general outcomes of the Action. The Memorandum of Understanding of the Action presents our methodology, aims and deliverables: all details in Appendix A. The report of Working Phase 1 is available at: http://www.tram-urban-safety.eu/spip.php?article329 and in Appendix B. Detailed information about each topic and the entities involved in the Action will be covered in the Working Group reports (for each Working Phase). These will be restricted to the members` part of the Action website, but specified parts of this detailed information can be made available on demand, which will be expressed by request to the Action webmaster Mr. Dominique BERTRAND ([email protected]). Operation and safety of tramways in interaction with public space – TU1103 page 4/211 Executive Summary The insertion of tramways and Light Rail Transit into an urban area so that they can operate safely and efficiently while interacting with other public space users is one the most important challenges to the planning principles on urban rail infrastructure design. To find the best adapted and safest infrastructure design for optimising interactions between tramways and other users of urban space, is for public transport operators and authorities one of the means to improve the level of service, and thus help to grow the modal shift in favour of Public Transport. Dealing with this issue, this Action enhances this strategy by examining how operators and city authorities can collect, process and analyse accident data and assess safety management improvements, and it gives the opportunity to hold a debate about some main safety experiences in several European countries and cities. Rather than providing conclusive guidance, the report of COST Action TU1103 seeks to share suggestions, successful experiences and good practices, which can contribute to enhancing a safer insertion of trams into urban areas. While the tram is generally a safe mode of transport, all tram networks are facing the task of maintaining and improving safety, and similar issues are encountered all over Europe. Then, there are both good and sometimes bad experiences, successful stories, appropriate solutions and efficient practices. Various countries’ feedback and knowledge could be useful for others, if sharing
Recommended publications
  • Ashton-Under-Lyne Tram Stop 12 March 2019
    Rail Accident Report Passenger injury at Ashton-under-Lyne tram stop 12 March 2019 Report 15/2019 November 2019 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2019 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.gov.uk/raib. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Website: www.gov.uk/raib Derby UK DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Preface Preface The purpose of a Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) investigation is to improve railway safety by preventing future railway accidents or by mitigating their consequences. It is not the purpose of such an investigation to establish blame or liability. Accordingly, it is inappropriate that RAIB reports should be used to assign fault or blame, or determine liability, since neither the investigation nor the reporting process has been undertaken for that purpose. The RAIB’s findings are based on its own evaluation of the evidence that was available at the time of the investigation and are intended to explain what happened, and why, in a fair and unbiased manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Design Implications from Traffic Safety Evaluation for Tramway Systems
    Ulla Saari Planning and design implications from traffic safety evaluation for tramway systems Thesis submitted for examination for the degree of Master of Science in Technology. Espoo 18.2.2019 Supervisor: Asst. Prof. Milos N. Mladenovic, PhD Advisor: M. Sc. Davy Beilinson Aalto University, P.O. BOX 11000, 00076 AALTO www.aalto.fi Abstract of master's thesis Author Ulla Saari Title of thesis Planning and design implications from traffic safety evaluation for tramway systems Master programme Spatial Planning and Transportation Code ENG26 Engineering Thesis supervisor Milos Mladenovic Thesis advisor(s) Davy Beilinson Date 18.2.2019 Number of pages 99 Language English Abstract Modern tramways are a part of traffic system for urban and densifying city structure. First modern tramways are planned nowadays in Finland. Planning and design create a base for a safe traffic system. Traffic safety influences on our everyday life and is a requirement for a well-functioning and efficient transport system and city structure. This thesis concentrates on planning and design of tramway systems from traffic safety point of view. In this thesis, traffic safety for tramway systems is studied by using accident data from Helsinki, Gothenburg and Dublin. GIS-analysis, data analysis, conflict point maps and previous studies are used to identify design factors influencing tramway safety. Based on the accident data, specific points of infrastructure are considered in terms of safety. Planning and design solutions are considered for motor vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists. Safety in design is studied for intersections, crossing points and tram stop areas. Clarity of the traffic system is a key factor for safe environment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Connectivity and Accessibility Between Tram Stops and Public Facilities: a Case Study in the Historic Cities of Europe
    Urban Street Design & Planning 73 A study on connectivity and accessibility between tram stops and public facilities: a case study in the historic cities of Europe Y. Kitao1 & K. Hirano2 1Kyoto Women’s University, Japan 2Kei Atelier, Yame, Fukuoka, Japan Abstract The purpose of this paper is to understand urban structures in terms of tram networks by using the examples of historic cities in Europe. We have incorporated the concept of interconnectivity and accessibility between public facilities and tram stops to examine how European cities, which have built world class public transportation systems, use the tram network in relationship to their public facilities. We selected western European tram-type cities which have a bus system, but no subway system, and we focused on 24 historic cities with populations from 100,000 to 200,000, which is the optimum size for a large-scale community. In order to analyze the relationship, we mapped the ‘pedestrian accessible area’ from any tram station in the city, and analyzed how many public facilities and pedestrian streets were in this area. As a result, we were able to compare the urban space structures of these cities in terms of the accessibility and connectivity between their tram stops and their public facilities. Thus we could understand the features which determined the relationship between urban space and urban facilities. This enabled us to evaluate which of our target cities was the most pedestrian orientated city. Finally, we were able to define five categories of tram-type cities. These findings have provided us with a means to recognize the urban space structure of a city, which will help us to improve city planning in Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Current and Future Accident and Impact Scenarios for Pedestrians and Cyclists WP Number: 4
    N Current and future accident and impact scenarios for pedestrians and cyclists WP Number: 4 WP Title: Vulnerable Road User Protection Deliverable D4.1 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 768960. Current and future accident and impact scenarios for pedestrians and cyclists Work Package 4, Deliverable 4.1. Please Refer to this Report as Follows: Klug, Corina; Leo, Christoph; Schachner, Martin; Rizzi, Maria; Grumert, Ellen; Davidse, Ragnhild; Heinzl, Philipp; Iancovici, Sava; Wågström, Linus; Lindman, Magdalena; Thomson, Robert; Linder, Astrid (2020). Current and future accident and impact scenarios for pedestrians and cyclists, Deliverable 4.1. of the H2020 project VIRTUAL. Project details: Project start date: 01/06/2018 Duration: 48 months Project name: Open access virtual testing protocols for enhanced road user safety – VIRTUAL Coordinator: Astrid Linder, Adj Prof, PhD – Research Director Traffic Safety Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI) Regnbågsgatan 1, 417 55 Gothenburg, Sweden This project has received funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No. 768960. Deliverable details: Version: Final Dissemination level: PU (Public) Due date: 31/07/2019 Submission date: 31/03/2020 Online location: - Lead Contractor for this Deliverable: VTI, TU Graz Report Author(s): Corina Klug, Christoph Leo, Martin Schachner (TU Graz) Ellen Grumert, Maria Rizzi, Astrid Linder (VTI) Philipp Heinzl (Siemens) Ragnhild Davidse (SWOV) Sava Iancovici, Linus Wågstöm, Magdalena Lindman, (Volvo) Reviewer: Robert Thomson (Chalmers), Sweden VIRTUAL | Milestone Report D4.1 | WP 4 | Final i Legal Disclaimer All information in this document is provided "as is" and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Area Map Buses and Trams Taxis
    Ashton-Under-Lyne Station i Onward Travel Information Buses and Trams Local area map Rail replacement buses depart from the Station car park. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2018 & also map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, CC BY-SA Main destinations by bus (Data correct at December 2019) DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP 7 Stand B 231 Stand A Ridge Hill Estate 389 Stand F Hartshead Ashton Moss 217 Stand D 232 P Wellington Road Rochdale 409 Stand C Metrolink Tram Stop 396, 419 Stand A Royton 409 Stand C Hathershaw 7 Stand B 409 Stand C St Anne's Estate 335 Stand A 216 M Gas Street Hattersley 387 Stand F Salford Quays/MediaCityUK Metrolink Tram Stop Audenshaw 217 Stand D Haughton Green 347 K Katherine Street 231 Stand A Smallshaw 219 L Gas Street Hazelhurst 336, 337 P Wellington Road 232, 336, 337 P Wellington Road Metrolink Tram Stop Hey Farm Estate 350 Stand G 216 M Gas Street Bredbury 330 R Gas Street Heyrod 353, 354, 355** Stand D 217 Stand D Carrbrook 348 Stand G Hollingworth 236, 237 Stand E Sportcity 230 Stand B Chadderton 419 Stand A Hollinwood 396 Stand A 231 Stand A Copley 348 Stand G 216 Stand M Metrolink Tram Stop Coppice 419 Stand A Holt Town 231 Stand A 7 Stand B Stockport Crowhill 339 Stand A Metrolink Tram Stop 330 R Gas Street Dane Bank 7 Stand B 231 Stand A 231 Stand A Hurst Cross 335 Stand A 232, 336, 337 P Wellington Road Tameside General Hospital 350 Stand G Denton 345 R Gas Street 330 R Gas Street 387, 389 Stand F 347
    [Show full text]
  • Albo-AEC-PIETRANGELI-18-02-2019
    Associazione Europea Ferrovieri – Italia ALBO DELLE ASSOCIAZIONI FERROVIARIE E CULTURALI DELL’AREA DELLE FERROVIE TURISTICHE a cura di: Mario Pietrangeli Con il patrocinio di: _____________________________________________________________________________ Pubblicazione prodotta sotto l’egida della: Edizione: febbraio 2019 2 PREFAZIONE Il 16 settembre 2017 si costituisce a Pesaro – nell’ambito delle iniziative degli Stati Generali della Mobilità Nuova - l’Alleanza per la Mobilità Dolce. Essa nasce dal desiderio delle più importanti Associazioni Nazionali, impegnate sul tema, di collaborare per promuovere e far crescere la mobilità dolce, attraverso una serie di azioni e attività da sviluppare congiuntamente. La rete sul territorio per la mobilita dolce promuove il piacere del viaggio a bassa velocità e la mobilità attiva, integrando percorsi ciclabili, reti di cammini, ferrovie turistiche, linee ferroviarie locali, riutilizzando e qualificando il patrimonio esistente, in una visione integrata con il trasporto collettivo: una rete dolce, semplice da utilizzare da parte di tutti. Obiettivo principale è la promozione, di una Rete Nazionale (nel futuro si pensa di estendere tale promozione anche a livello Europeo) di Mobilità Dolce e Sostenibile (Integrata con le realtà Turistiche, Artistiche, Gastronomiche delle Località e dei Piccoli Borghi Attraversati) che abbia come requisiti fondamentali: il recupero delle infrastrutture territoriali dismesse (ferrovie, infrastrutture ferroviarie, funivie, canali e vie fluviali, strade arginali, percorsi
    [Show full text]
  • FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE the Disability Resources Centre
    DISABILITY RESOURCES CENTRE (INC.) 3rd Floor, Ross House 247 Flinders Lane MELBOURNE 3000 Ph. 9671 3000 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE The Disability Resources Centre welcomes Tram Stop Upgrades 9th May 2018 The DRC congratulates the Victorian Government on the announcement to upgrade the existing tram system, making it more accessible for people with disabilities. We are pleased that new island platforms will enable people with wheelchairs and mobility aids to travel independently to several Melbourne hospitals, cultural centres and places of education. The Disability Resources Centre (DRC) is a member-driven organisation that is managed and staffed by people with disabilities. We promote the rights of people with disabilities through individual and systemic advocacy. We are currently conducting an Accessible Public Transport project investigating the major transport issues faced by Victorians with disabilities. Throughout our consultation process we have recorded several examples of people with disabilities being unable to access essential services or popular destinations due to inaccessible trams. A mother living in a regional area shared that she regularly travels by train to Melbourne for hospital appointments with her son, yet there is no accessible public transport from the CBD train station to the hospital. She recalled being unable to exit the tram at the hospital, not knowing where the next accessible stop would be and whether she would arrive in time for the appointment, after travelling hours to get there. The new raised platforms will enable them to take the full journey from home to the hospital on public transport reducing the uncertainty, stress and cost they currently face.
    [Show full text]
  • Project of Territorial Governance of Tourism in Venice
    Project of territorial governance of tourism in Venice Project of territorial governance of tourism in Venice 2 Project of territorial governance of tourism in Venice Table of Contents FOREWORD.............................................................................................................................................................7 FIRST PART:...........................................................................................................................................................11 THE START OF A PARTICIPATORY ROUTE.................................................................................................................11 1. The functions of tourism and the regulatory framework...............................................................................13 2. Tourism in Venice..........................................................................................................................................15 3. The resident population................................................................................................................................22 4. The stages of the participatory route.............................................................................................................25 5. Principal mission statements of the projects presented and adopted by the Technical Working Group..........27 SECOND PART:.......................................................................................................................................................43 OPERATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Accidents and Injuries to Road Transport Drivers TE--WE-10-004-EN-N
    ISSN 1831-9351 A review of accidents and injuries to road transport drivers TE--WE-10-004-EN-N TE--WE-10-004-EN-N Authors European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) Sarah Copsey (project manager) Members of EU-OSHA Topic Centre – Working Environment Nicola Christie, RCPH, UK Linda Drupsteen, TNO, The Netherlands Jakko van Kampen, TNO, The Netherlands Lottie Kuijt-Evers, TNO, The Netherlands Ellen Schmitz-Felten, KOOP, Germany Marthe Verjans, Prevent, Belgium Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers, or these calls may be billed. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found on the cover of this publication. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2010 ISBN -13: 978-92-9191-355-8 doi:10.2802/39714 © European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, 2010 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. A REVIEW OF ACCIDENTS AND INJURIES TO ROAD TRANSPORT DRIVERS A review of accidents and injuries to road transport drivers Table of contents 1. Introduction....................................................................................................................................3 1.1. Objective of this report............................................................................................................3 1.2. Methodology ...........................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • What Light Rail Can Do for Cities
    WHAT LIGHT RAIL CAN DO FOR CITIES A Review of the Evidence Final Report: Appendices January 2005 Prepared for: Prepared by: Steer Davies Gleave 28-32 Upper Ground London SE1 9PD [t] +44 (0)20 7919 8500 [i] www.steerdaviesgleave.com Passenger Transport Executive Group Wellington House 40-50 Wellington Street Leeds LS1 2DE What Light Rail Can Do For Cities: A Review of the Evidence Contents Page APPENDICES A Operation and Use of Light Rail Schemes in the UK B Overseas Experience C People Interviewed During the Study D Full Bibliography P:\projects\5700s\5748\Outputs\Reports\Final\What Light Rail Can Do for Cities - Appendices _ 01-05.doc Appendix What Light Rail Can Do For Cities: A Review Of The Evidence P:\projects\5700s\5748\Outputs\Reports\Final\What Light Rail Can Do for Cities - Appendices _ 01-05.doc Appendix What Light Rail Can Do For Cities: A Review of the Evidence APPENDIX A Operation and Use of Light Rail Schemes in the UK P:\projects\5700s\5748\Outputs\Reports\Final\What Light Rail Can Do for Cities - Appendices _ 01-05.doc Appendix What Light Rail Can Do For Cities: A Review Of The Evidence A1. TYNE & WEAR METRO A1.1 The Tyne and Wear Metro was the first modern light rail scheme opened in the UK, coming into service between 1980 and 1984. At a cost of £284 million, the scheme comprised the connection of former suburban rail alignments with new railway construction in tunnel under central Newcastle and over the Tyne. Further extensions to the system were opened to Newcastle Airport in 1991 and to Sunderland, sharing 14 km of existing Network Rail track, in March 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • RIHSAC Presentation January 2019
    1 ORR protects the interests of rail and road users, improving the safety, value and performance of railways and roads today and in the future Health and safety priorities 2019/20 and outcomes from the annual Risk Assessment and Risk Ranking (RARR) exercise Ian Prosser 2 Top priorities for 2019-20 – internal focus ■ Developing our staff and ensuring that we have a succession plan. We have a number of staff who are likely to leave us over the next year and currently 20 staff who are in training posts ( with 3 more to join) ■ Organisational effectiveness and capability – continuously improve core process of investigation and enforcement, QMS and data for planning ■ Embedding team approach to supervising heritage and tram sector ■ Introduction of new technology and trains – creating a new rolling stock post to aid this, improving understanding of automation and human factors ■ Supervision of Sandilands RAIB recommendations; moving from enablers to operational delivery ■ Brexit and bilateral engagement – legislative change to our criteria and procedures - developing new relationships 3 Top priorities for 2019-20 (following RARR and themes in 2017/18 annual health and safety report) ■ Poor performance creates pressure on the system – pressure on staff, priority of managing safety, degraded modes and recovery, PTI, station overcrowding ■ Network Rail: Operating Irregularities; Vegetation Management; SPAD Management; Trespass; Workforce safety. ■ Safe introduction into use of the Crossrail Central Operating Section (CCOS) ■ The challenges of CP6 – increased route devolution and route MD ownership and route / center accountabilities; focus on punctuality, performance and delivery of volumes on time and to cost – create the conditions where (unconscious) prioritisation of other factors can allow safety standards to slip… 4 RARR review 2018 .
    [Show full text]
  • A White Paper)
    Indian Railways Lifeline of the nation (A White Paper) February 2015 Government of India Ministry of Railways NEW DELHI Contents FOREWORD ________________________________________________________________ 1 1. Introduction______________________________________________________________ 3 4. Customer Engagement ____________________________________________________ 20 5. Rolling Stock ____________________________________________________________ 29 6. Financial Status _________________________________________________________ 32 7. Alternate Financing Options _______________________________________________ 41 8. Conclusion______________________________________________________________ 47 9. Annexes ________________________________________________________________ 48 10. Glossary of common terms in use in Railway Statistics __________________________ 58 Indian Railways Lifeline of the nation List of Tables Table 1: Share of Transport Sector in Overall GDP (%) .............................................................4 Table 2: Key Parameters .............................................................................................................4 Table 3: Financing the Railway Plan ..........................................................................................7 Table 4: Passenger Service Yields in some Major Economies ......................................................7 Table 5: Freight Yields in some Major Economies ......................................................................8 Table 6: Benchmarking Indian Railways
    [Show full text]