Final Report on Elements of Work Plan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Ref. Ares(2017)3520569 - 12/07/2017 TEN-T Core Network Corridors Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor 2nd Phase Final Report on the Elements of the Work Plan Final version: 12.07.2017 12 July 2017 1 Study on Scandinavian-Mediterranean TEN-T Core Network Corridor 2nd Phase (2015-2017) Final Report on the Elements of the Work Plan Information on the current version: The draft final version of the final report on the elements of the Work Plan was submitted to the EC by 22.05.2017 for comment and approval so that a final version could be prepared and submitted by 06.06.2017. That version has been improved with respect to spelling and homogeneity resulting in a version delivered on 30.06.2017. The present version of the report is the final final version submitted on 12.07.2017. Disclaimer The information and views set out in the present Report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for any potential use which may be made of the information contained herein. 12 July 2017 2 Study on Scandinavian-Mediterranean TEN-T Core Network Corridor 2nd Phase (2015-2017) Final Report on the Elements of the Work Plan Table of contents 1 Executive summary ............................................................................... 13 1.1 Characteristics and alignment of the ScanMed Corridor .............................. 13 1.2 Traffic demand and forecast ................................................................... 18 1.3 Actions already accomplished ................................................................. 19 1.4 Plan for the removal of physical and technical barriers .............................. 23 1.5 Administrative and operational barriers ................................................... 26 1.6 Urban nodes ........................................................................................ 27 1.7 Analysis of wider elements of the Work Plan............................................. 31 2 Introduction ......................................................................................... 32 3 Characteristics of the Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor ....................... 35 3.1 Background information......................................................................... 35 3.2 Corridor alignment ................................................................................ 35 3.3 Corridor characteristics .......................................................................... 37 3.4 Compliance with the technical infrastructure parameters of the TEN-T guideline ............................................................................................. 37 4 Traffic demand and forecast ................................................................... 41 4.1 Results from the Multimodal Transport Market Study ................................. 41 4.2 Continued observation of traffic demand (KPI) ......................................... 41 5 Actions already accomplished ................................................................. 42 5.1 Rail Infrastructure and ERTMS ................................................................ 45 5.2 Road Infrastructure ............................................................................... 53 5.3 Air transport Infrastructure (Airports)...................................................... 59 5.4 Maritime Infrastructure (Seaports) and MoS ............................................. 67 5.5 Rail-Road Terminals .............................................................................. 75 6 Plan for the removal of physical and technical barriers .............................. 85 6.1 Rail Infrastructure and ERTMS ................................................................ 87 6.1.1 TEN-T infrastructure requirements – KPI ‘Electrification’ ............................ 87 6.1.2 TEN-T infrastructure requirements - KPI ‘Line speed ≥ 100 km/h’ ............... 90 6.1.3 TEN-T infrastructure requirements - KPI ‘Axle load ≥ 22.5 tonnes’ .............. 93 6.1.4 TEN-T infrastructure requirements - KPIs ‘(Standard) Track gauge’ and ‘Train length ≥ 740 m’........................................................................... 96 6.1.5 Operational bottlenecks ......................................................................... 98 6.1.6 Missing links ........................................................................................ 99 6.1.7 Summary of main results and conclusions .............................................. 100 6.2 Road Infrastructure ............................................................................. 104 6.3 Air Infrastructure (Airports) ................................................................. 113 6.4 Maritime Infrastructure (Ports) and MoS ................................................ 130 6.5 Rail-Road Terminals ............................................................................ 149 7 Potential administrative and operational barriers .................................... 165 7.1 Rail Infrastructure ............................................................................... 166 7.2 Road Infrastructure ............................................................................. 169 7.3 Air Infrastructure (Airports) ................................................................. 170 7.4 Maritime Infrastructures (Ports) and MoS .............................................. 171 7.5 Rail-Road Terminals ............................................................................ 172 12 July 2017 3 Study on Scandinavian-Mediterranean TEN-T Core Network Corridor 2nd Phase (2015-2017) Final Report on the Elements of the Work Plan 8 Analysis of urban nodes ....................................................................... 173 8.1 Introduction and objectives .................................................................. 175 8.2 Methodological approach ..................................................................... 176 8.3 Analysis results .................................................................................. 180 8.3.1 Helsinki ............................................................................................. 180 8.3.2 Turku ................................................................................................ 184 8.3.3 Oslo .................................................................................................. 189 8.3.4 Göteborg ........................................................................................... 195 8.3.5 Malmö ............................................................................................... 197 8.3.6 Stockholm ......................................................................................... 201 8.3.7 København ........................................................................................ 206 8.3.8 Hamburg ........................................................................................... 209 8.3.9 Bremen ............................................................................................. 213 8.3.10 Hannover ........................................................................................... 215 8.3.11 Berlin ................................................................................................ 218 8.3.12 Leipzig, Halle ..................................................................................... 221 8.3.13 Nürnberg ........................................................................................... 224 8.3.14 München ............................................................................................ 226 8.3.15 Bologna ............................................................................................. 229 8.3.16 Roma ................................................................................................ 232 8.3.17 Napoli ............................................................................................... 236 8.3.18 Palermo ............................................................................................. 241 8.3.19 Valletta ............................................................................................. 242 8.3.20 Conclusions ........................................................................................ 244 9 Wider elements of the Work Plan .......................................................... 250 12 July 2017 4 Study on Scandinavian-Mediterranean TEN-T Core Network Corridor 2nd Phase (2015-2017) Final Report on the Elements of the Work Plan List of tables Table 1: Generic supply-side KPI – baseline 2014, status 2016, 2017 and target 2030 ...................................................................................... 17 Table 2: Generic demand-side KPI, baseline 2014, status 2016 and 2017............. 18 Table 3: Corridor modal share, baseline 2014, status 2016 and 2017 .................. 19 Table 4: Corridor lines compliance check on the Scandinavian-Mediterranean urban nodes ..................................................................................... 28 Table 5: Connection analysis of the access points to the corridor network ............ 30 Table 6: Socio-economic indicators of the ScanMed Corridor in the year 2013 ....... 35 Table 7: Characteristics of the ScanMed Corridor in the year 2016......................