Matthew and the Rabbis: Symbol and Scripture in Gospel and Midrash By

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Matthew and the Rabbis: Symbol and Scripture in Gospel and Midrash By Matthew and the Rabbis: Symbol and Scripture in Gospel and Midrash By Nicholas J. Schaser Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Religion May, 2017 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Amy-Jill Levine, Ph.D. Phillip I. Ackerman-Lieberman, Ph.D. Richard McGregor, Ph.D. Shaul Kelner, Ph.D. Lenn E. Goodman, D.Phil. David B. Levenson, Ph.D. Copyright © 2017 Nicholas J. Schaser All rights Reserved ii To my parents Jim and Sarah $ma trwt vjt law $yba rswm ynb [mv and to my wife Melissa yl ydwdw ydwdl yna iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply grateful for the wisdom and encouragement of my dissertation committee throughout my time at Vanderbilt. As my masters and doctoral advisor, Amy-Jill Levine has provided me with her knowledge of the New Testament and Jewish literature, honed my writing, and affirmed my abilities as a teacher. I applied to Vanderbilt in the hopes of working with A.-J., and it has been a joy and a privilege to have realized that goal. Phillip Lieberman has been a constant source of support and friendship. He strengthened my proficiency in rabbinic Hebrew and Aramaic, and also allowed me to co-teach a course with him at Congregation Micah, which led to further teaching opportunities. I wish to extend special thanks to Phil for pronouncing the Aaronic blessing during my wedding at Vanderbilt Divinity School’s Benton Chapel. I have benefited from Lenn Goodman’s mentorship, and I value the time I spent as his research assistant for the past several years. I thank Lenn and his wife Roberta for being so kind and accommodating to my wife Melissa and me. Richard McGregor has been a very helpful and attentive HACTOR advisor, and he has deepened my understanding of critical theory and comparative method. Shaul Kelner was particularly helpful to me during his time as director of the Jewish Studies Program, and ensured that I was supported both academically and financially. Finally, I thank David Levenson for being willing to meet with me at the Florida State University Graduate Student Symposium, to read a paper I gave at FSU, and to offer his expertise in both Matthew and Genesis Rabbah. At Vanderbilt, I also benefited from the teaching and support of Jay Geller, Bryan Lowe, Martina Urban, and Meike Werner. My professors at Luther Seminary provided me with biblical and linguistic foundations for my future graduate work, particularly Terence Fretheim, Mark Throntveit, Craig Koester, and Rolf Jacobson. My correspondences with Craig Keener were very iv helpful as I researched my dissertation. I also wish to thank Nicholas Piotrowski for our discussion at SBL in 2016, as well as our continued email correspondence. Although we disagree on some aspects of Matthew, Nicholas has provided me with both research sources and personal encouragement over the past several months, and I have the utmost respect for him as a scholar and discussion partner. In the Vanderbilt Department of Religion, I thank James Byrd and Karen Eardley for their attentiveness throughout my coursework, qualifying exams, and dissertation defense. Special thanks goes to Karen for scheduling the defense and being so patient with my many questions. Marie McEntire was especially helpful throughout my masters degree and greatly facilitated my matriculation into the doctoral program. From the Vanderbit Divinity Library, I thank Eileen Crawford, Chris Benda, Jill Brown, and Charlotte Lew for being such wonderful supervisors during my time as a Jewish Studies bibliographer. I also am grateful for the administrative support and friendship of Lindsey Bunt and Lynne Perler in the Vanderbilt Jewish Studies Program. I have been fortunate to surround myself with friends and peers at Vanderbilt who have made my academic experience more enjoyable, and from whom I have learned much—most particularly, Jacob and Taylor DeBoer, Will Livingston, Sean Bortz, Ekaputra Tupamahu, Sung Uk Lim, Aaron Howard, Joe Chen, Nathan Bloodworth, Tim Giesy, Tamesha Derico, and Rachel Whitley. My friend and colleague Reed Carlson, now at Harvard Divinity School, has been an invaluable conversation partner since we met as masters students at Luther Seminary. Josh Urich at UT Austin has promoted the twin virtues of humor and intelligence in our discussions of religious studies. I am also grateful to Flip and Laurie Rice, Julie Greenberg, Ken Alpern, Guy D. Griffith, and Stan Mitchell, each of whom graciously provided me with teaching v opportunities at churches and synagogues in the Nashville area. John and Linda Shafer were like second parents to me while I lived in Nashville and I extend my warmest thanks and love to both of them. My father- and mother-in law, Phil and Karen Reginelli, have been loving and encouraging beyond measure. I am also grateful for the wonderful relationships I have with my sister-in-law Jen and her husband Matt, along with my niece and nephew Marilyn and M. J., and with my brother-in-law Michael, his wife Heather, and my niece Vivian. My parents, Jim and Sarah, have supported me in every way imaginable, and I could not have accomplished my academic and personal goals without them. I am blessed to have grown up in a home that values the Bible and faith, and I could never thank my parents enough for their love and care. My brothers, Ian and Wilson, have provided me with constant joy and amusement, as well as discussions that have strengthened my understanding of the biblical text. Finally, all my love and gratitude goes to my wife and best friend Melissa. She remained a source of strength and comfort through every step of my degree, and was deeply invested in my success—right down to the bibliography that she compiled at the conclusion of this work. Melissa’s sacrifices and encouragements have made this dissertation possible. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DEDICATION............................................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................iv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS.........................................................................................................ix Chapter I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................1 II. Atomistic vs. Contextual Exegesis in the New Testament and Rabbinic Literature ...............31 Atomism vs. Contextuality in Christian Scholarship ..............................................................34 Rabbinic Atomism in Jewish Scholarship ...............................................................................57 Rabbinic Contextuality in Jewish Scholarship ........................................................................64 Conclusion ...............................................................................................................................76 III. Commemorative Symbols, Comparative Method, and Narrative Patterning..........................78 Commemorative Narratives and Symbols...............................................................................80 Comparative Method: Preventing Parallelomania...................................................................93 Narrative Patterning: Citation, Allusion, and Metalepsis......................................................104 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................114 IV. Challenging “Ongoing Exile” in Matthew and Rabbinic Literature .....................................116 The Definition of Exile in Israel’s Scriptures........................................................................118 N. T. Wright and Ongoing Exile ...........................................................................................119 Matthew’s Genealogy (Mt 1:1-17)........................................................................................128 Matthew’s Scriptural Citations in 1:23-4:16 .........................................................................133 Mt 1:23: Jesus as Immanuel ...............................................................................................134 Mt 2:6: Jesus as David........................................................................................................136 Mt 2:15: Jesus’ Exile and Exodus ......................................................................................141 Mt 2:18: Children in Exile..................................................................................................143 Mt 2:23: Jesus as the Branch ..............................................................................................144 Mt 3:3: Jesus Appears to Zion............................................................................................147 Mt 4:15-16: Jesus’ Light in Israel.......................................................................................150 Exile in Rabbinic Literature...................................................................................................153 Exile in Genesis Rabbah........................................................................................................161 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................165 V. The People of Israel’s Sin and Forgiveness
Recommended publications
  • Congregation Torah Ohr 19146 Lyons Road, Boca Raton, FL 33434 (561) 479-4049 ● ● [email protected] Rabbi Benjamin S
    February 5 — 11, 2021 23 — 29 Shevat 5781 Congregation Torah Ohr 19146 Lyons Road, Boca Raton, FL 33434 (561) 479-4049 ● www.torahohrboca.org ● [email protected] Rabbi Benjamin S. Yasgur President, Jonas Waizer Office Hours Monday - Thursday 9:00am - 3:00pm, Friday 9:00am - 12noon WEEKDAY TIMES Earliest Davening (Fri-Thurs) 5:53am* Mishna Yomit (in Shul & online) 15 min. before Mincha Earliest Tallit/Tefillin (Fri-Thurs) 6:20am* Mincha/Ma’ariv (Shul & Tent) (S-Th) Shacharit at Shul (starting with Pesukai D’Zimra) 7:30am Shacharit in the Tent (starting with Pesukai D’Zimra) 8:30am Daven Mincha (S-Th) prior to 6:08pm Daf Yomi (online) 8:30am Repeat Kriat Shema after 6:46pm* Chumash Class (online) 9:30am *These are the latest times during the week BS”D CONGREGATION TORAH OHR NEW - UPDATED POLICIES FOR KEEPING OUR COMMUNITY SAFE We enjoy the seasonal return of our cherished congregants, friends, and neighbors. At the same time, let us acknowledge that the Corona-19 pandemic is not yet over. We cannot afford complacency in our sheltered senior community until the pandemic is fully controlled. Considering the situation of pikuach nefesh, the Shul will continue policies that protect all our members. We want you in Shul ASAP. But first, individuals returning to Florida, even from short out-of-state stays, must adhere to the CDC, Florida State and Shul rules: a) Self-isolate for 12 days; DO NOT ATTEND SHUL, including outdoor minyanim. If you have no symptoms after 12 days, please SHABBAT YITRO register to attend shul minyanim.
    [Show full text]
  • The Generic Transformation of the Masoretic Text of Qohelet 9. 7-10 in the Targum Qohelet and Qohelet Midrash Rabbah
    Durham E-Theses Wine, women and work: the generic transformation of the Masoretic text of Qohelet 9. 7-10 in the Targum Qohelet and Qohelet Midrash Rabbah Hardy, John Christopher How to cite: Hardy, John Christopher (1995) Wine, women and work: the generic transformation of the Masoretic text of Qohelet 9. 7-10 in the Targum Qohelet and Qohelet Midrash Rabbah, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/5403/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 WINE, WOMEN AND WORK: THE GENERIC TRANSFORMATION OF THE MA50RETIC TEXT OF QOHELET 9. 7-10 IN THE TARGUM QOHELET AND QOHELET MIDRASH RABBAH John Christopher Hardy This tnesis seeks to understand the generic changes wrought oy targum Qonelet and Qoheiet raidrash rabbah upon our home-text, the masoretes' reading ot" woh.
    [Show full text]
  • Zeraim Tractates Terumot and Ma'serot
    THE JERUSALEM TALMUD FIRST ORDER: ZERAIM TRACTATES TERUMOT AND MA'SEROT w DE G STUDIA JUDAICA FORSCHUNGEN ZUR WISSENSCHAFT DES JUDENTUMS HERAUSGEGEBEN VON E. L. EHRLICH BAND XXI WALTER DE GRUYTER · BERLIN · NEW YORK 2002 THE JERUSALEM TALMUD Ή^ίτ τΐίΛη FIRST ORDER: ZERAIM Π',ΙΓΙΪ Π0 TRACTATES TERUMOT AND MA'SEROT ΓτηελΡΏΐ niQnn rnooü EDITION, TRANSLATION, AND COMMENTARY BY HEINRICH W. GUGGENHEIMER WALTER DE GRUYTER · BERLIN · NEW YORK 2002 Die freie Verfügbarkeit der E-Book-Ausgabe dieser Publikation wurde ermöglicht durch den Fachinformationsdienst Jüdische Studien an der Universitätsbibliothek J. C. Senckenberg Frankfurt am Main und 18 wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken, die die Open-Access-Transformation in den Jüdischen Studien unterstützen. ISBN 978-3-11-017436-6 ISBN Paperback 978-3-11-068128-4 ISBN 978-3-11-067718-8 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-090846-6 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-067726-3 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-067730-0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. For This work is licensed under the Creativedetails go Commons to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Attribution 4.0 International Licence. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Das E-Book ist als Open-Access-Publikation verfügbar über www.degruyter.com, Library of Congresshttps://www.doabooks.org Control Number: 2020942816und https://www.oapen.org 2020909307 Bibliographic informationLibrary published of Congress by the Control Deutsche Number: Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek DeutscheThe Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data detailedare available bibliographic on the data Internet are available at http://dnb.dnb.de.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinful Thoughts: Comments on Sin, Failure, Free Will, and Related Topics Based on David Bashevkin’S New Book Sin•A•Gogue: Sin and Failure in Jewish Thought
    Sinful Thoughts: Comments on Sin, Failure, Free Will, and Related Topics Based on David Bashevkin’s new book Sin•a•gogue: Sin and Failure in Jewish Thought Sinful Thoughts: Comments on Sin, Failure, Free Will, and Related Topics Based on David Bashevkin’s new book Sin•a•gogue: Sin and Failure in Jewish Thought (Boston: Academic Studies Press, 2019) By Rabbi Yitzchok Oratz A Bashevkin-inspired Bio Blurb:[1] Rabbi Yitzchok Oratz is Rabbi of the Monmouth Torah Links community in Marlboro, NJ. His writings can be found in various rabbinic and popular journals, including Hakira, Ohr Yisroel, Nehoroy, Nitay Ne’emanim, and on Aish, Times of Israel, Torah Links, Seforim Blog, and elsewhere. His writings are rejected as often as they are accepted, and the four books he is currently working on will likely never see the light of day. “I’d rather laugh[2] with the sinners than cry with the saints; the sinners are much more fun.”[3] Fortunate is the man who follows not the advice of the wicked, nor stood in the path of the sinners, nor sat in the session of the scorners. (Psalms 1:1) One who hopes is always happy [and] without pain . hope keeps one alive . even one who has minimal good deeds . has hope . one who hopes, even if he enters Hell, he will be taken out . his hope is his purity, literally the Mikvah [4] of Yisroel . and this is the secret of repentance . (Ramchal, Derush ha-Kivuy) [5] Rabbi David Bashevkin is a man deeply steeped in sin.
    [Show full text]
  • HERMENEUTICAL CRITICISMS: by Mark E
    Issues of Interpretation Ozark Christian College, GB 216-2 Professor Mark E. Moore, Ph.D. Table of Contents: 1. Hermeneutical Constructs .......................................................................................................2 2. A Chart of the History of Hermeneutics .................................................................................5 3. History of Interpretation .........................................................................................................7 4. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, 1.1.10.......................................................................29 5. Allegory of 153 Fish, Jn 21:11 .............................................................................................30 6. How the Holy Spirit Helps in Interpretation .........................................................................31 7. Problem Passages ..................................................................................................................32 8. Principles for Dealing with Problem Passages .....................................................................33 9. Cultural vs. Universal ...........................................................................................................34 10. Hermeneutical Constructs .....................................................................................................36 11. Hermeneutical Shifts .............................................................................................................38 12. Hermeneutical Constructs:
    [Show full text]
  • Poem from "Bechadarav” וירדחב, Trans. Yaakov
    TORAT BAVEL, TORAT ERETZ YISRAEL LEAH ROSENTAL I [email protected] trans. Yaakov David Shulman ,בחדריו ”Poem from "Bechadarav The Clarity of The Land Of Israel My heart yearns for the clarity of the land of Israel For the faith of the land of Israel For the holiness of the land of Israel Where can I find the joy of the land of Israel The inner calm of the land of Israel The closeness to the Divine of the land of Israel The truth of the land of Israel The might and power of the land of Israel The trust of the land of Israel Have mercy, Hashem, have compassion Compassionate and gracious God Be merciful Make it possible for me to come back to you totally Bring me back to Your beautiful land Make it possible for me to see the joy of Your people To rejoice with Your heirs Have compassion, have compassion Compassionate Father Have mercy, liberate, liberating God 1|7 TORAT BAVEL, TORAT ERETZ YISRAEL LEAH ROSENTAL I [email protected] תלמוד בבלי - מסכת סנהדרין Babylonian Talmud - Sanhedrin 24a דף כד עמוד א אמר רבי אושעיא: מאי דכתיב R. Oshaia said: What is the meaning of the verse, And I (זכריה י"א) "ואקח לי )את( שני took unto me the two staves; the one I called No'am מקלות לאחד קראתי נועם — ?[graciousness] and the other I called 'hoblim' [binders] ולאחד קראתי חובלים", נועם - No'am' refers to the scholars of Palestine, who treat each' אלו תלמידי חכמים שבארץ ישראל, שמנעימין זה לזה other graciously [man'imim] when engaged in halachic בהלכה.
    [Show full text]
  • From Falashas to Ethiopian Jews
    FROM FALASHAS TO ETHIOPIAN JEWS: THE EXTERNAL INFLUENCES FOR CHANGE C. 1860-1960 BY DANIEL P. SUMMERFIELD A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON (SCHOOL OF ORIENTAL AND AFRICAN STUDIES) FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PhD) 1997 ProQuest Number: 10673074 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10673074 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT The arrival of a Protestant mission in Ethiopia during the 1850s marks a turning point in the history of the Falashas. Up until this point, they lived relatively isolated in the country, unaffected and unaware of the existence of world Jewry. Following this period and especially from the beginning of the twentieth century, the attention of certain Jewish individuals and organisations was drawn to the Falashas. This contact initiated a period of external interference which would ultimately transform the Falashas, an Ethiopian phenomenon, into Ethiopian Jews, whose culture, religion and identity became increasingly connected with that of world Jewry. It is the purpose of this thesis to examine the external influences that implemented and continued the process of transformation in Falasha society which culminated in their eventual emigration to Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Narratives in the Septuagint: a Discourse on Method1
    READING NARRATIVES IN THE SEPTUAGINT: A DISCOURSE ON METHOD1 Dichk M. Kanonge North-West University, Potchefstroom A. INTRODUCTION The interpretation of texts depends greatly upon their literary genres. Narratives are the predominant genre in the Septuagint. More than a third of the Hebrew Bible, even without the Apocrypha, consists of narratives.2 Despite its abundance however, this literary genre is often interpreted without taking its distinctiveness into account. Narrative interpretation is still dependent either on grammatical- historical3 or on historical-critical analysis.4 It is the contention of this article that, with regard to narrative analysis, these two approaches are limited, unless they are coupled with rhetorical analysis. Principles “for dealing with the literary form of the text as part and parcel of the 1 This article is a version of a paper read at the annual conference of the Association for the Study of the Septuagint in South Africa, held at the University of Stellenbosch in 2008 (August 14 to 15). It is a part of the author’s Ph.D. thesis at North-West University, Potchefstroom campus, under the supervision of Prof P. J. Jordaan. 2 Bar-Efrat, Narrative art in the Bible (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2000), 9; W. C. Kaiser and M. Silva, An Introduction to Biblical Hermeneutics: The Search for Meaning (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1994), 54. 3 The grammatical-historical approach was the preferred method of the reformers because “they were concerned to recover the original sense, which they felt had been buried under centuries of spiritual interpretation” K. J. Vanhoozer, Is There a Meaning in This Text? The Bible, the Reader, and the Morality of Literary Knowledge (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1998), 118.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Jewish Commentaries and Patristic Literature on the Book of Ruth
    A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF JEWISH COMMENTARIES AND PATRISTIC LITERATURE ON THE BOOK OF RUTH by CHAN MAN KI A Dissertation submitted to the University of Pretoria for the degree of PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR Department of Old Testament Studies Faculty of Theology University of Pretoria South Africa Promoter: PIETER M. VENTER JANUARY, 2010 © University of Pretoria Summary Title : A comparative study of Jewish Commentaries and Patristic Literature on the Book of Ruth Researcher : Chan Man Ki Promoter : Pieter M. Venter, D.D. Department : Old Testament Studies Degree :Doctor of Philosophy This dissertation deals with two exegetical traditions, that of the early Jewish and the patristic schools. The research work for this project urges the need to analyze both Jewish and Patristic literature in which specific types of hermeneutics are found. The title of the thesis (“compared study of patristic and Jewish exegesis”) indicates the goal and the scope of this study. These two different hermeneutical approaches from a specific period of time will be compared with each other illustrated by their interpretation of the book of Ruth. The thesis discusses how the process of interpretation was affected by the interpreters’ society in which they lived. This work in turn shows the relationship between the cultural variants of the exegetes and the biblical interpretation. Both methodologies represented by Jewish and patristic exegesis were applicable and social relevant. They maintained the interest of community and fulfilled the need of their generation. Referring to early Jewish exegesis, the interpretations upheld the position of Ruth as a heir of the Davidic dynasty. They advocated the importance of Boaz’s and Ruth’s virtue as a good illustration of morality in Judaism.
    [Show full text]
  • Iying¹wxt¹lretd¹z@¹Xkeyd
    IYING¹WXT¹LRETD¹Z@¹XKEYD ])8U| vO)[{Nz8[(T{C)[{Nz8.wTwSRLxLzD)2yU ])8U| vOOxU)5|G]wC[xN)9|G :@¹DPYN¹¹fol. 44c )[{Nz8P)Z{QzOP)Z{2yQ.wTwSRLxLOw:]LyD{JLyO[xDvUvG)O[|Q{Cw:Ly5O|UV|C]w[wJ|CG{NC{OzQ)2yU [{<(Q Mishnah 1: If somebody hires a worker to work for him on libation wine, his wages are forbidden1. If he hired him for other work, even though he told him, transport an amphora of libation wine for me from one place to another, his wages are permitted2. 1 If a Gentile hires a Jewish worker fact that libation wine is forbidden for specifically to work on his wine, the wages usufruct for a Jewish owner. are forbidden to the worker for all usufruct. 2 The moment that libation wine was not The rule which makes it impossible for the mentioned at the time of the hiring, there is Jewish worker to be hired in this way is no obligation on the worker to refrain from purely rabbinical; it is not implied by the being occupied with libation wine. i¦A¦x m¥W§a Ed¨A©` i¦A¦x .Fl o¥zFp `Ed Fx¨k§U `Ÿl§e .'lek l¥rFRd © z¤` x¥kFVd © :@¹DKLD (44c line 50) .EdEq¨p§w q¨p§w .o¨p¨gFi zFxi¥t§A .`xi ¨r§ ¦ f i¦A¦x x©n¨` .zi¦ria§ ¦ U o¨x¨k§U zi¦ria§ ¦ X©A oi¦UFrdÎl¨ ¨ k§e mit¨ ¦ Y©M©d§emi¦ x¨O©g©d .i¥P©Y x¨k¨W oi¦l§hFp Ed§i `ŸNW ¤ i`©P©i i¦A¦x zi¥a§C oi¥Ni¦`§l o¨p¨gFi i¦A¦x i¥xFdc § `i¦d©d§e .`¨zi¦p§z©n `id ¦ x¥zid ¥ d¨x¨f d¨cFa£r zFxi¥t§A .i©li¦i iA¦ ¦ x x©n¨` .oFd§li¥ xFd d¨i§n¤g§p i¦A¦x§kE dcEd§i ¨ i¦A¦x§M zFr¨n `¨N¤` o¦i©i o¤dici ¥ A ¦ .EdEq¨p§w q¨p§w K¤q¤p o¦i©i§A .o¨p¨gFi i¦A¦x m¥W§a Ed¨A©` i¦A¦x x©n¨c§M .`¨zi¦p§z©n `i¦d Halakhah 1: “If somebody hires a worker,” etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Bible Characters Mentioned Outside the Bible (See History.)
    Last updated: 12-Dec-2018 at 18:15 Bible chronology main page Bible Characters Mentioned Outside the Bible (See History.) © Richard P. Español in Contemporary Sources Aschmann Rick Aschmann Contents 1. Lists of Identified Individuals 2. Why are none found earlier than the kings? 2.1. The Pharaohs 2.1.1. Couldn’t we identify unnamed pharaohs based on the Egyptian king lists? 2.1.2. Can we identify the later named pharaohs? 2.2. The Four Kings of the East 2.3. Other Theories 1. Lists of Identified Individuals Many individuals mentioned in the Bible are also mentioned outside the Bible in contemporary (or fairly contemporary) archaeological sources. The following two links give a fairly complete list of these. List of biblical figures identified in extra-biblical sources 50 people in the bible confirmed archaeologically The interesting thing is that both of these sites evidently have the perspective that the Bible is not the inerrant, inspired Word of God, whereas I believe it is.1 So it might seem like such lists are not useful for the Bible-believer. On the contrary, they are quite useful: these are names that everyone can agree have been confirmed from extra-biblical sources, so they serve to confirm the reliability of the Bible in spite of having been compiled by unbelievers! If you look at the chart near the top of the first site, you can sort it from earliest to latest by clicking twice in the title of the Date (BCE) column. This chart shows that the earliest attested name (according to the compiler of this list) is Omri the father of Ahab, whose reign (and dynasty) started in 880 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • (Re)Discovering a Midrashic Biblical Imagination for the Progressive-Liberal Community
    Luther Seminary Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary Doctor of Ministry Theses Student Theses 5-20-2018 (Re)Discovering a Midrashic Biblical Imagination for the Progressive-Liberal Community Elisabeth R. Jones Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/dmin_theses Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, and the Liturgy and Worship Commons Recommended Citation Jones, Elisabeth R., "(Re)Discovering a Midrashic Biblical Imagination for the Progressive-Liberal Community" (2018). Doctor of Ministry Theses. 32. https://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/dmin_theses/32 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctor of Ministry Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. (RE)DISCOVERING A MIDRASHIC BIBLICAL IMAGINATION FOR THE PROGRESSIVE-LIBERAL CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY by ELISABETH R. JONES A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Luther Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF MINISTRY ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 2018 © 2018 by Elisabeth R. Jones All rights reserved ABSTRACT (Re)Discovering a Midrashic Biblical Imagination for the Progressive-Liberal Community by Elisabeth R. Jones This thesis presents the case for the development of a sustainable community practice of midrashic biblical imagination as a catalyst for transformative engagement with the Bible in progressive Christian congregations. Notes that a midrashic imagination applied to the polyvalent testimonies of the biblical canon is an apt partner for post- modern, progressive congregations, whose theology embraces diversity, plurality, and critique of hegemonic structures.
    [Show full text]