DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Copy of Dissertation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Copy of Dissertation The Talmudic Zohar: Rabbinic Interdisciplinarity in Midrash ha-Ne’lam ​ by Joseph Dov Rosen A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Joint Doctor of Philosophy with Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley in Jewish Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Daniel Boyarin, Chair Professor Deena Aranoff Professor Niklaus Largier Summer 2017 © Joseph Dov Rosen All Rights Reserved, 2017 Abstract The Talmudic Zohar: Rabbinic Interdisciplinarity in Midrash ha-Ne’lam ​ By Joseph Dov Rosen Joint Doctor of Philosophy in Jewish Studies with the Graduate Theological Union University of California, Berkeley Professor Daniel Boyarin, Chair This study uncovers the heretofore ignored prominence of talmudic features in Midrash ​ ​ ha-Ne’lam on Genesis, the earliest stratum of the zoharic corpus. It demonstrates that Midrash ​ ​ ha-Ne’lam, more often thought of as a mystical midrash, incorporates both rhetorical ​ components from the Babylonian Talmud and practices of cognitive creativity from the medieval discipline of talmudic study into its esoteric midrash. By mapping these intersections of Midrash, Talmud, and Esotericism, this dissertation introduces a new framework for studying rabbinic interdisciplinarity—the ways that different rabbinic disciplines impact and transform each other. The first half of this dissertation examines medieval and modern attempts to connect or disconnect the disciplines of talmudic study and Jewish esotericism. Spanning from Maimonides’ reliance on Islamic models of Aristotelian dialectic to conjoin Pardes (Jewish ​ ​ esotericism) and talmudic logic, to Gershom Scholem’s juvenile fascination with the Babylonian Talmud, to contemporary endeavours to remedy the disciplinary schisms generated by Scholem’s founding models of Kabbalah (as a form of Judaism that is in tension with “rabbinic Judaism”), these two chapters tell a series of overlapping histories of Jewish inter/disciplinary projects. The section’s juxtaposition of medieval and contemporary models of talmudic-esoteric interdisciplinarity provides a framework for overcoming the models of disciplinarity that the field of Zohar Studies inherited from Scholem’s pioneering scholarship and clears theoretical space for rethinking the disciplinary commitments of Midrash ha-Ne’lam. ​ ​ The second half of the dissertation demonstrates that Midrash ha-Ne’lam uses talmudic ​ ​ reasoning and rhetoric for three purposes: (1) to formulate a model of divine cosmogenesis that is akin to talmudic creativity; (2) to advocate for applying talmudic reasoning to secrets as a way to expand esoteric knowledge; (3) and to represent a scholastic community in which rabbis search for secrets together and debate each other’s esoteric lore. 1 Dedicated to my Zeidy of blessed memory - Rabbi Marvin Luban מים עמוקים עצה בלב איש ואיש תבונות ידלנה i Acknowledgments This work could not have reached fruition without the support, encouragement, friendship, and guidance rendered by several people and departments, to whom I wish to express immense gratitude. Daniel Boyarin has been an exemplar of a scholar who cares equally about the past and the present, and has constantly reminded me that “if there is no flour there is no Torah.” Deena Aranoff has made herself available for endless hours of conversation and has constantly challenged me to be as clear and gracious in my writing as possible. And Niklaus Largier has opened my work to new horizons of mystical thought and critical imagination. Without the financial and administrative support of Jewish Studies Joint Doctoral program and its staff—Sandy Richmond, Shorena Kurtsikidze, Erica Roberts, Etta Heber—this doctorate would surely have taken double the time and fourfold the toll. That the final chapter of my dissertation addresses “scholastic sociality” and the centrality of friendship to a spiritual life has only underscored my indebtedness to my own community of scholar-friends. My local peers at UC Berkeley—Jerilyn Sambrooke, Jennifer Valentina Mackenzie, Raphael Magarik, Eli Rosenblatt, Eyal Bassan—have incredulously made my time on campus a time wherein sociality does not come at the cost of scholarship. And the many friends and mentors who have offered support, insight, edits, and a listening ear—Avishai Bar- Asher, Jonatan Benarroch, Hillel Broder, Eitan Fishbane, Amit Gvaryahu, Joel Hecker, Gilah Kletenik, Jana Jett Loeb, Ronit Meroz, Moulie Vidas, Nathan Wolski—have transformed the solitariness of dissertation writing into a time of convocation. Finally, over the past two years, my partner, Amy Rae Ruben, has reminded me daily that, “you got this.” Her trust and love are an undercurrent present throughout these pages. ii Table of Contents Introduction Toward a Bibliographical History of Midrash ha-Ne'lam………………………………...1 A Heap of Nuts: On Rabbinic Interdisciplinarity………………………………………..11 Summary of Chapters…………………………………………………………………....14 Part I Chapter 1 Jewish Esotericism and Talmudic Studies in Modern Jewish Scholarship………………....16 “Don’t Become Frum”: Scholem’s Talmud Studies (1913-1921).....................................17 Models of Interdisciplinarity in the Contemporary Study of Jewish Esotericism……....33 Chapter 2 Maimonides’ Pardes: A Medieval Model of Jewish Interdisciplinarity…………………….39 The Pardes in the Talmud………………………………………………………………..39 Jadal in Early Islamic Fiqh (Jurisprudence) and Kalam (Theology).................................42 Dialectics and Dissensus in Maimonides’ Legal Theory………………………………...45 Entering the Pardes: Dialectics and Dissensus in Maimonidean Esotericism…………...48 Conclusion: Talmud/Jadal/Padres………………………………………………………..55 Part II Chapter 3 The Logic of Binah: A Genealogy of Generative Cognition in Pre-Modern Jewish Literature………………………………………………………………………………………..59 “Davar mi-Davar”: Analogical Inferences in Tannaitic Midrash……………………....60 Talmud as Inferential Reasoning in Amoraic and Early Medieval Literature…………...69 “Sod mitokh Sod”: A History of Inferential Esotericism………………………………...74 Celestial Inferences: Binah as a Method of Cosmogony in Midrash ha-Ne'lam………...82 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….98 Chapter 4 The Temporalities of Sevara: Talmudic Models of Innovation in Midrash ha-Nelam…….101 The Talmudic Elements of Midrash ha-Ne'lam………………………………………...101 Sevara and Esoteric Creativity………………………………………………………….103 Contesting Esoteric Sevara……………………………………………………………..109 Sevara as a Literary Form……………………………………………………………....115 Midrash ha-Ne'lam and the Zoharic Renaissance………………………………………118 iii Chapter 5 Scholastic Sociality: The Talmudic Rhetoric of Midrash ha-Nelam……………………….123 Jewish Collectivities and Zoharic Literature…………………………………………...123 Social Esotericism: A History of the Hevraya………………………………………….125 The Amoraic Anachronism: Amoraic Rabbis and Rhetoric in Midrash ha-Ne'lam……131 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………142 iv Introduction I. Toward a Bibliographical History of Midrash ha-Ne'lam Printed in the sixteenth-century, partly in Sefer ha-Zohar (Cremona and Mantua, 1558-1560) and partly in Zohar Hadash (Salonika, 1597), Midrash ha-Ne'lam on Genesis is an eclectic and often esoteric midrash on the first thirty-two chapters of Genesis. The relationship between Midrash ha-Ne'lam and the Zohar is an historical enigma. The early-modern editions of the Zohar present Midrash ha-Ne'lam as a vertical column with its own title, configured alongside a parallel column that is simply titled, Zohar (or Zohar Hadash). Although they share narratological1 and rhetorical features,2 modern scholars have identified stylistic and theological differences between Midrash ha-Ne'lam on Genesis and other strata of zoharic literature.3 Stylistically, Midrash ha- Ne'lam contains a heteroglossic mixture of Aramaic and Hebrew (almost all other sections of zoharic literature are written solely in Aramaic), an assemblage of short midrashim (in contrast to the longer homilies of “Zohar”), and references to a wide, dispersed network of rabbinic sages (many other sections of zoharic literature revolve around “the hevraya,” an intimate cohort of ten rabbis). Theologically, Midrash ha-Ne'lam on Genesis is devoid of the kabbalistic theosophy and erotic mythology that defines other zoharic strata. Instead, its pericopes feature philosophical allegoresis and pre-kabbalistic traditions on a (comparably) small set of themes: cosmogony, the nature of the soul, the afterlife, eschatology, and the angelic realm. This dissertation introduces an additional quality that distinguishes Midrash ha-Ne'lam4 from other sections of zoharic literature, namely, the talmudic orientation of Midrash ha-Ne'lam. I contend that both the Babylonian Talmud and the medieval discipline of talmud study inform multiple features of Midrash ha-Ne'lam: its disputational rhetoric, its advocacy of creativity, its representation of rabbinic sociality, its model of divine cosmogenesis, and (in at least one instance) its compositional style. Because these talmudic features cut across stylistic, cultural, and theological registers, they encourage a historiography of Midrash ha-Ne'lam that incorporates both the formal and ideational developments of medieval Judaism. Given its unusual textual form (as a text within a text, so to speak), a bibliographical history of Midrash ha-Ne'lam is required before a formal-intellectual history of “the talmudic 1 See David Greenstein, Roads to Utopia: The Walking Stories of the Zohar (Stanford: Stanford University
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TALMUDIC STUDIES Ephraim Kanarfogel
    chapter 22 TALMUDIC STUDIES ephraim kanarfogel TRANSITIONS FROM THE EAST, AND THE NASCENT CENTERS IN NORTH AFRICA, SPAIN, AND ITALY The history and development of the study of the Oral Law following the completion of the Babylonian Talmud remain shrouded in mystery. Although significant Geonim from Babylonia and Palestine during the eighth and ninth centuries have been identified, the extent to which their writings reached Europe, and the channels through which they passed, remain somewhat unclear. A fragile consensus suggests that, at least initi- ally, rabbinic teachings and rulings from Eretz Israel traveled most directly to centers in Italy and later to Germany (Ashkenaz), while those of Babylonia emerged predominantly in the western Sephardic milieu of Spain and North Africa.1 To be sure, leading Sephardic talmudists prior to, and even during, the eleventh century were not yet to be found primarily within Europe. Hai ben Sherira Gaon (d. 1038), who penned an array of talmudic commen- taries in addition to his protean output of responsa and halakhic mono- graphs, was the last of the Geonim who flourished in Baghdad.2 The family 1 See Avraham Grossman, “Zik˙atah shel Yahadut Ashkenaz ‘el Erets Yisra’el,” Shalem 3 (1981), 57–92; Grossman, “When Did the Hegemony of Eretz Yisra’el Cease in Italy?” in E. Fleischer, M. A. Friedman, and Joel Kraemer, eds., Mas’at Mosheh: Studies in Jewish and Moslem Culture Presented to Moshe Gil [Hebrew] (Jerusalem, 1998), 143–57; Israel Ta- Shma’s review essays in K˙ ryat Sefer 56 (1981), 344–52, and Zion 61 (1996), 231–7; Ta-Shma, Kneset Mehkarim, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Exegetical Craft of the Zohar: Toward an Appreciation
    THE EXEGETICAL CRAFT OF THE ZOHAR: TOWARD AN APPRECIATION ELIEZER SEGAL As a consequence of the specialization that thrives in current humanistic studies, it is not surprising that scholarship has tended to classify the literary creations of the past into fixed compartments. In the study of medieval Judaism, it is particularly common to follow the traditional division of disci- plines into philosophy, Kabbalah, and rabbinism-a categorization that was indeed promoted by the medievals themselves.' Following this way of thinking, the study of Rashi's biblical commentaries would be assigned to one class of scholars devoted to the study of rabbinic Judaism; Maimonides' Guide of the Perplexed to experts in Jewish philosophy; and the Zohar to yet a third group consisting of specialists in Jewish mysticism. As helpful as such a division of labor may be, we should not lose sight of 1. Some aspects of the interrelationships between the three medieval Jewish disciplines of "talmudism," philosophy, and Kabbalah are explored by I. Twersky, "Talmudists, Philoso- phers, Kabbalists: The Quest for Spirituality in the Sixteenth Century," in Jewish Thought in the Sixteenth Century, ed. B. Cooperman (Cambridge, Mass., and London, 1983), pp. 431-457. The classification underlies the fourfold division employed in R. Bahya b. Asher's commentary to the Pentateuch (to which he adds the method of peshat interpretation). 32 ELIEZER SEGAL the fact that these kinds of classifications tend to obscure the individuality of sources which can often, when taken on their own terms, prove notoriously difficult to pigeonhole. In the specific context of medieval Judaism, we must bear in mind that philosophers and mystics alike saw themselves as operat- ing within the tradition defined by the Talmud and Midrash, whose more profound or mysterious contents they were venturing to expound.
    [Show full text]
  • Shabbat-B'shabbato – Parshat Behaalotecha No 1577: 19 Sivan 5775 (6 June 2015)
    Shabbat-B'Shabbato – Parshat Behaalotecha No 1577: 19 Sivan 5775 (6 June 2015) AS SHABBAT APPROACHES Testimony for All of Humanity - by Rabbi Oury Cherki, Machon Meir, Rabbi of Beit Yehuda Congregation, Jerusalem This week's Haftarah begins with the return of the Shechina – the holy Presence – to Zion and with the significance of this process for mankind: "Sing and be happy, daughter of Zion, for I am coming, and I will dwell within you – this is what G-d says. And many nations will join together with G-d on that day." [Zecharia 2:14-15]. The end of the Haftarah describes the Shechina as an image of a Menorah, similar to the one in the Temple. The proximity of the two images is taken by the sages as proof that the Menorah will serve as testimony for all of humanity that the Shechina dwells within Bnei Yisrael. It is true that the Menorah is placed outside of the Holy of Holies, such that at first glance it would seem that it is at a lower level of sanctity than the Ark of the Covenant, where the Torah is kept. This corresponds to the notion that the nation of Yisrael, including the appearance of the Shechina within it, is of minor importance when compared to the Torah. However, Rav Kook explains that this is only true from an external point of view, but that from an internal viewpoint – since the Torah was given for the sake of Yisrael and Yisrael preceded the Torah – the Menorah is indeed holier than the Ark.
    [Show full text]
  • Moses Hayim Luzzatto's Quest for Providence
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 'Like Iron to a Magnet': Moses Hayim Luzzatto's Quest for Providence David Sclar Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/380 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] “Like Iron to a Magnet”: Moses Hayim Luzzatto’s Quest for Providence By David Sclar A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in History in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The City University of New York 2014 © 2014 David Sclar All Rights Reserved This Manuscript has been read and accepted by the Graduate Faculty in History in satisfaction of the Dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Prof. Jane S. Gerber _______________ ____________________________________ Date Chair of the Examining Committee Prof. Helena Rosenblatt _______________ ____________________________________ Date Executive Officer Prof. Francesca Bregoli _______________________________________ Prof. Elisheva Carlebach ________________________________________ Prof. Robert Seltzer ________________________________________ Prof. David Sorkin ________________________________________ Supervisory Committee iii Abstract “Like Iron to a Magnet”: Moses Hayim Luzzatto’s Quest for Providence by David Sclar Advisor: Prof. Jane S. Gerber This dissertation is a biographical study of Moses Hayim Luzzatto (1707–1746 or 1747). It presents the social and religious context in which Luzzatto was variously celebrated as the leader of a kabbalistic-messianic confraternity in Padua, condemned as a deviant threat by rabbis in Venice and central and eastern Europe, and accepted by the Portuguese Jewish community after relocating to Amsterdam.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fifth Passover Cup and Magical Pairs: Isaac Baer Levinsohn and the Babylonian Talmud
    European Journal of Jewish Studies 15 (2021) 84–103 brill.com/ejjs The Fifth Passover Cup and Magical Pairs: Isaac Baer Levinsohn and the Babylonian Talmud Leor Jacobi Abstract The Fifth Passover Cup is mentioned in a textual variant of a baraita in Tractate Pesaḥim of the Babylonian Talmud (118a), attributed to Rabbi Ṭarfon and another anonymous Palestinian tanna. Scholars have demonstrated that the variant is primary in talmu- dic manuscripts and among the Babylonian Geonim. Following a nineteenth-century proposition of Isaac Baer Levinsohn, it is argued that the fifth cup was instituted in Babylonia due to concern for magical evil spirits aroused by even-numbered events [zugot]. Objections to Levinsohn’s theory can be allayed by critical source analysis: the Talmud’s attribution of the fifth cup to the Palestinian tanna Rabbi Ṭarfon in a baraita is pseudoepigraphic, based upon Rabbi Ṭarfon’s teaching regarding the recitation of Hallel ha-Gadol in Mishnah Ta‘anit 3:9. A special appendix is devoted to Levinsohn’s separate study on zugot in the ancient and medieval world. Keywords Talmud – Passover – magic – Haskalah – source criticism – Halakhah – Levinsohn – magical pairs © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/1872471X-bja10020.0102883/ 3..8.31893: The Fifth Passover Cup and Magical Pairs 85 1 Introduction1 If the four Passover cups were created during the six days of creation, then the fifth was conjured up at twilight on the eve of the Sabbath.2 The saga of the mysterious fifth cup stretches from its origins in a phantom talmudic tex- tual variant to its alleged metamorphosis into the ubiquitous “cup of Elijah” to latter-day messianic revival attempts incorporating the visual arts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Generic Transformation of the Masoretic Text of Qohelet 9. 7-10 in the Targum Qohelet and Qohelet Midrash Rabbah
    Durham E-Theses Wine, women and work: the generic transformation of the Masoretic text of Qohelet 9. 7-10 in the Targum Qohelet and Qohelet Midrash Rabbah Hardy, John Christopher How to cite: Hardy, John Christopher (1995) Wine, women and work: the generic transformation of the Masoretic text of Qohelet 9. 7-10 in the Targum Qohelet and Qohelet Midrash Rabbah, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/5403/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 WINE, WOMEN AND WORK: THE GENERIC TRANSFORMATION OF THE MA50RETIC TEXT OF QOHELET 9. 7-10 IN THE TARGUM QOHELET AND QOHELET MIDRASH RABBAH John Christopher Hardy This tnesis seeks to understand the generic changes wrought oy targum Qonelet and Qoheiet raidrash rabbah upon our home-text, the masoretes' reading ot" woh.
    [Show full text]
  • The Participation of God and the Torah in Early Kabbalah
    religions Article The Participation of God and the Torah in Early Kabbalah Adam Afterman 1,* and Ayal Hayut‑man 2 1 Department of Jewish Philosophy and Talmud, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel 2 School of Jewish Studies and Archaeology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: All Abrahamic religions have developed hypostatic and semi‑divine perceptions of scrip‑ ture. This article presents an integrated picture of a rich tradition developed in early kabbalah (twelfth–thirteenth century) that viewed the Torah as participating and identifying with the God‑ head. Such presentation could serve scholars of religion as a valuable tool for future comparisons between the various perceptions of scripture and divine revelation. The participation of God and Torah can be divided into several axes: the identification of Torah with the Sefirot, the divine grada‑ tions or emanations according to kabbalah; Torah as the name of God; Torah as the icon and body of God; and the commandments as the substance of the Godhead. The article concludes by examining the mystical implications of this participation, particularly the notion of interpretation as eros in its broad sense, both as the “penetration” of a female Torah and as taking part in the creation of the world and of God, and the notion of unification with Torah and, through it, with the Godhead. Keywords: Kabbalah; Godhead; Torah; scripture; Jewish mysticism; participation in the Godhead 1. Introduction Citation: Afterman, Adam, and Ayal The centrality of the Word of God, as consolidated in scripture, is a central theme in Hayut‑man.
    [Show full text]
  • Oneg 6 – Toldos 2018
    1 Oneg! A collection of fascinating material on the weekly parsha! Rabbi Elchanan Shoff Parshas TOLDOS Avraham begat Yitzchak (Gen. 25:19). The Or Hachaim and R. Shlomo Kluger (Chochmas Hatorah, Toldos p. 3) explain that it was in Avraham’s merit that G-d accepted Yitzchak’s prayers and granted him offspring. Rashi (to Gen. 15:15, 25:30) explains that G-d had Avraham die five years earlier than he otherwise should have in order that Avraham would not see Yitzchak’s son Esau stray from the proper path. I saw in the name of R. Yosef Chaim Sonnenfeld (Chochmas Chaim to Toldos) that if Yitzchak had not campaigned vigorously in prayer to father a child, G-d would have granted him children anyways after five years. So in which merit did Yitzchak father his children, in Avraham’s merit or in the merit of his own prayers? Both are true: It was only in Avraham’s merit that Yitzchak deserved to father Yaakov and Esau, but the fact that the twins were born earlier rather than later came in merit of Yitzchak’s prayers. R. Sonnenfeld adds that the Torah’s expression equals in Gematria the (748 = ויעתר לו י-ה-ו-ה) that denotes G-d heeding Yitzchak’s prayers .The above sefer records that when a grandson of R .)748 = חמש שנים) phrase five years Sonnenfeld shared this Gematria with R. Aharon Kotler, he was so taken aback that he exclaimed, “I am certain that this Gematria was revealed through Ruach HaKodesh!” Yitzchak was forty years old when he took Rivkah—the daughter of Besuel the Aramite from Padan Aram, the sister of Laban the Aramite—as a wife (Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Science in Abraham Ibn Ezra's Sefer Ha-Olam
    RELIGION AND SCIENCE IN ABRAHAM IBN EZRA'S SEFER HA-OLAM (INCLUDING AN ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF THE HEBREW TEXT) Uskontotieteen pro gradu tutkielma Humanistinen tiedekunta Nadja Johansson 18.3.2009 1 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Abraham Ibn Ezra and Sefer ha-Olam ........................................................................ 3 1.2 Previous research ......................................................................................................... 5 1.3 The purpose of this study ............................................................................................. 8 2 SOURCE, METHOD AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ....................................... 10 2.1 Primary source: Sefer ha-Olam (the Book of the World) ........................................... 10 2.1.1 Edition, manuscripts, versions and date .............................................................. 10 2.1.2 Textual context: the astrological encyclopedia .................................................... 12 2.1.3 Motivation: technical handbook .......................................................................... 14 2.2 Method ....................................................................................................................... 16 2.2.1 Translation and historical analysis ...................................................................... 16 2.2.2 Systematic analysis .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Polymorphism and Polysemy in Images of the Sefirot
    Portland State University PDXScholar Systems Science Faculty Publications and Presentations Systems Science Winter 3-16-2021 Polymorphism and Polysemy in Images of the Sefirot Martin Zwick Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/sysc_fac Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, Computer Sciences Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Zwick, Martin (2021). Polymorphism and Polysemy in Images of the Sefirot. Western Judaic Studies Association 25th Annual Conference, online. This Presentation is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Systems Science Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Polymorphism and Polysemy in Images of the Sefirot (Martin Zwick) Polymorphism and Polysemy in Images of the Sefirot Martin Zwick Portland State University, Portland OR 97207 [email protected] Western Judaic Studies Association 25th annual meeting Virtual, University of Nevada, Las Vegas March 16, 2021 web: https://works.bepress.com/martin_zwick/205 (Included in categories ‘Systems Theory and Philosophy’ and ‘Jewish Thought’) https://sites.google.com/view/ohrchadash/home 1 Abstract (1/2) • The resurgence of interest in Kabbalistic diagrams (Segol, Busi, Chajes) raises the question of how diagrams function in religious symbolism. This question can be approached via methods used in the graphical modeling of data. Specifically, graph theory lets one define a repertoire of candidate structures that can be applied not only to quantitative data, but also to symbols consisting of qualitative components.
    [Show full text]
  • Torah Portions for Shabbat & Haggim 2011
    TORAH PORTIONS FOR SHABBAT & HAGGIM 2011 – 2012 Bet Am Shalom follows the triennial cycle for Torah readings. This is the second year of the cycle; the actual verses to be chanted on each Shabbat and on certain holidays are listed below. October – 2011 Saturday 10/01 Shuvah Deuteronomy 32:1 – 52 Saturday 10/08 Yom Kippur Morning Leviticus 16:1 – 34 Numbers 29:7 – 11 Afternoon Leviticus 19:1 – 18 Thursday 10/13 Sukkot Day 1 Leviticus 23:22 – 44 Numbers 29:12 – 16 Saturday 10/15 Chol Ha-Mo’ed Exodus 33:12 – 34:26 Sukkot Numbers 29:17 – 25 Thursday 10/20 Shemini Atzeret Deuteronomy 33:1 – 34:12 Simchat Torah Genesis 1:1 – 2:3 Numbers 29:35 – 30:1 Saturday 10/22 Beresheet Genesis 2:4 – 4:26 Saturday 10/29 Noach / Rosh Chodesh Genesis 8:15 – 10:32 Numbers 28:9 – 15 November Saturday 11/05 Lech Lecha Genesis 14:1 – 15:21 Saturday 11/12 Vayeira Genesis 19:1 – 20:18 Saturday 11/19 Chayei Sarah Genesis 24:10 – 52 Saturday 11/26 Toldot Genesis 26:23 – 27:27 December Saturday 12/03 Vayetze Genesis 30:14 – 31:16 Saturday 12/10 Vayishlach Genesis 34:1 – 35:15 Saturday 12/17 Vayeishev Genesis 38:1 – 30 Saturday 12/24 Miketz / Chanukah Genesis 41:53 – 43:15 Numbers 7: 42 - 47 Saturday 12/31 Vayigash Genesis 45:28 – 46:27 January – 2012 Saturday 01/07 Vayechi Genesis 49:1 – 26 50:23 – 26 Saturday 01/14 Shemot Exodus 3:1 – 4:17 Saturday 01/21 Va-ayrah Exodus 7:8 – 8:15 Saturday 01/28 Bo Exodus 11:4 – 12:28 February Saturday 02/04 Beshelach / Shirah Exodus 14:15 – 16:10 Saturday 02/11 Yitro Exodus 19:1 – 20:23 Saturday 02/18 Mishpatim / Shekalim Exodus
    [Show full text]
  • Adas Israel Congregation June 2017 / Sivan–Tammuz 5777 Chronicle
    Adas Israel Congregation June 2017 / Sivan–Tammuz 5777 Chronicle Join us for our annual cantorial concert featuring the Argen-Cantors Chronicle • May 2017 • 1 The Chronicle Is Supported in Part by the Ethel and Nat Popick Endowment Fund clergycorner From the President By Debby Joseph Rabbi Lauren Holtzblatt In my early years of learning meditation I studied with Rabbi David Zeller (z”l), at Yakar, a wonderful synagogue in the heart of Jerusalem. I would go to his classes once a week and listen with strong intention to try to understand the practice of meditation, a practice that was changing my everyday life. During the past two years, when people Rabbi Zeller would talk often about the concept of devekut (attachment to learned that I was president of Adas Israel God) that the Hasidic masters had brought alive from teachings in the Zohar: Congregation, they inevitably cracked a “If you are already full, there is no room for God. Empty yourself like a vessel.” joke about feeling sorry for me. Never has I would try my hardest to understand what this meant, but I could not grasp that sentiment been further from the truth. I how to embody this concept, how to make it true to my own experience. have relished serving in this role. I have met How do you empty yourself? What does that feel like? many people, shared many experiences, For many years, in my own spiritual practice, I committed myself to learning and the feelings that permeated all that has meditation, sitting for 5, 10, 20, 30 minutes in silent meditation several times happened during my tenure make up one of a week.
    [Show full text]