DRAFT International Section 214 Authorizations

Copy Link

PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 1919 M STREET N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 News media information 202/418-0500. Recorded listing of releases and texts 202/418-2222. DA 96-986 Report No. 1-8183 June 20, 1996 COMMISSION SEEKS COMMENT ON THE ATTACHED EXCLUSION LIST FOR GLOBAL SECTION 214 AUTHORIZATIONS COMMENTS DUE: July 8, 1996 REPLIES DUE: July 15, 1996 Effective June 13, the Office of Management and Budget has approved the Commission©s new procedures for the international Section 214 authorization process and tariff requirements. The new procedures were adopted in the Report and Order, Streamlining the International Section 214 Authorization Process and Tariff Requirements, IB Docket No. 95-118, FCC 96-79 (re. March 13, 1996). As part of the new procedures, the Commission has drafted an exclusion list identifying restrictions on providing service using particular facilities or to particular countries for those carriers receiving a global Section 214 authorization. Attached is a draft of the exclusion list. The Commission seeks comments on the countries and facilities listed. The deadline for filing comments is July 8, 1996. The deadline for filing Replies is July 15, 1996. Comments should be filed in duplicate with the secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20554. A copy of the comments also should be sent to Troy Tanner, Chief, Policy and Facilities Branch, Federal Communications Commission 2000 M St. N.W., Room 840, Washington, DC 20554. - FCC- 11833 DRAFT 1. ^9^,? International Section 214 Authorizations © USA © - Exclusion List as of (date) The following is a list of countries and facilities not covered by grant of global Section 214 authority under Section 63.18(e)(l) of the Commission©s Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 63.18(e)(l). In addition, the facilities listed shall not be used by U.S. carriers authorized under Section 63.01 of the Commission©s Rules, unless the carrier©s Section 214 authorization specifically lists the facility. Carriers desiring to serve countries or use facilities listed as excluded hereon shall file a separate Section 214 application pursuant to Section 63.18(e)(6) of the Commission©s Rules. Countries Cuba (applications for service to this country shall comply with the separate filing requirements of the Commission©s Public Notice Report No. 1-6831. dated July 27, 1993, "FCC to Accept Applications for Service to Cuba.") Facilities CANUS-1 Cable System All non-U.S. licensed Cable and Satellite Systems Except: Foreign Cable Systems Aden-Djibouti ITUR APC KAFOS APCN KATTEGAT-1 APHRODITE 2 Kuantan-Kota Kinabalu ARIANNE 2 LATVIA-SWEDEN ASEAN Malaysia-Thailand B-M-P Marseille/Palermo Link Brunei-Singapore MAT-2 CADMOS ODIN CANTAT-3 PENCAN-5 CARAC R-J-K CELTIC RIOJA 11834 China-Japan SAT-2 CIOS SEA-ME-WE 2 Denmark-Russia 1 T-V-H ECFS TAGIDE 2 EMOS-1 TASMAN 2 EURAFRICA UGARJT Germany-Denmark 1 UK-BEL 6 Germany-Sweden No. 4 UK-Germany 5 Germany-Sweden No. 5 UK-Netherlands 12 H-J-K " UK-Spain 4 HONTAI-2 UNISUR This list is subject to change by the Commission when the public interest requires. Before amending the list, the Commission will first issue a public notice giving affected parties the opportunity for comment and hearing on the proposed changes. The Commission will then release an order amending the exclusion list. This list also is subject to change upon issuance of an Executive Order. See Streamlining the Section 214 Authorization Process and Tariff Requirements, IB Docket No. 95-118 FCC 96-79, released March 13, 1996 <j!8. For additional information, contact the International Bureau©s Policy & Facilities Branch. (202)418-1460. 11835.

Recommended publications

Regulatory, Infrastructure and Tariff Aspects of Electronic

MM www.idate.org The European way to think the Digital World Regulatory, infrastructure and tariff aspects of electronic communications and broadband connectivity in the Outermost Regions (OR) A comparison of the current situation with that in the rest of the Community and neighbouring countries Prepared for the European Commission DG Regional Policy December 2005 This study was financed by the European Community and was performed by IDATE and LL&A in partnership with INESC PORTO (Portugal) and MM (Spain). The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors only and under no circumstances are to be construed as those of the European Commission. IDATE – BP4167 – 34092 Montpellier cedex 5 – Tel : +33(0)467 144 444 – Fax : +33(0)467 144 400 – [email protected] Regulatory, infrastructure and tariff aspects of electronic communications and broadband connectivity in the ORs: A comparison of the current situation with that in the rest of the Community and neighbouring countries Final report Contents Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 7 1. State of the art of telecommunications in the ORs....................................................................... 9 1.1. Networks and services............................................................................................................. 9 1.2. Regulation and competition ................................................................................................... 12
SUPPLY RECORD - REPEATERED SYSTEM ( 1 ) 1St Generation (Regenerator System Using 1.31 Micron Wavelength)

SUPPLY RECORD - REPEATERED SYSTEM ( 1 ) 1st Generation (Regenerator System using 1.31 micron wavelength) System Landing Countries Capacity Route Length Delivery Japan, U.S.A. (Guam, TPC-3 (Note 1) 560Mbps (280Mbps x 2fp) 3,760km Dec. 88 Hawaii) Hong Kong, Japan, Hong Kong-Japan-Korea 560Mbps (280Mbps x 2fp) 4,700km Apr. 90 Korea Kuantan-Kota Kinabaru Malaysia 840Mbps (420Mbps x 2fp) 1,570km Dec. 90 Japan, U.S.A. North Pacific Cable (NPC) 1680Mbps (420Mbps x 4fp) 9,400km Apr. 91 (Mainland) Surabaya-Banjarmasin Indonesia 280Mbps (280Mbps x 1fp) 410km Dec. 91 N. ote 1:The very first Branching Units deployed in the Pacific 1 SUPPLY RECORD - REPEATERED SYSTEM ( 2 ) 2nd Generation (Regenerator System using 1.55 micron wavelength) System Landing Sites Capacity Route Length Delivery UK-Germany No.5 (Note 2) UK, Germany 3.6Gbps (1.8Gbps x 2fp) 500km Oct. 91 Brunei-Singapore Brunei, Singapore 1120Mbps (560Mbps x 2fp) 1500km Nov. 91 Brunei, Malaysia, Brunei-Malaysia-Philippines (BMP) 1120Mbps (560Mbps x 2fp) 1500km Jan. 92 Philippines Japan, U.S.A. TPC-4 1680Mbps (560Mbps x 3fp) 5000km Oct. 92 (Mainland) Japan, Hong Kong, APC Taiwan, Malaysia, 1680Mbps (560Mbps x 3fp) 7600km Aug. 93 Singapore Malaysia-Thailand Malaysia, Thailand 1120Mbps (560Mbps x 2fp) 1500km Aug. 94 (incl. Petchaburi-Sri Racha) Russia-Japan-Korea (RJK) Russia, Japan, Korea 1120Mbps (560Mbps x 2fp) 1700km Nov. 94 Thailand, Vietnam, Thailand-Vietnam-Hong Kong (T-V-H) 1120Mbps (560Mbps x 2fp) 3400km Nov. 95 Hong Kong N. ote 2: The very first giga bit submarine cable system in the world 2 SUPPLY RECORD - REPEATERED SYSTEM ( 3 ) 3rd Generation (Optical Amplifier System) System Landing Sites Capacity Route Length Delivery Malaysia Domestic (Southern Link) Malaysia 10Gbps (5Gbps x 2fp) 2,300km Jul.
Optical Fibre Submarine Systems

Optical fibre submarine GREENLAND systems D N ALASKA A (USA) ICELAND L Umeå N Vestmannaeyjar BOTNIA I Vaasa F Faroes SWEDEN Rauma RUSSIA 6 x 622 Turku Hallstavik Whittier Valdez Karst 2 + 1 x 2.5 Gbit/s Norrtälje Kingisepp Seward Tallin NORWAY ESTONIA U N Lena I 2 x 560 LATVIA CANTAT-3 T point AC-1 E DENMARK CANADA D Westerland LITHUANIA Northstar 2 x 4 (WDM) x 2.5 Gbit/s TAT-14 K I N REP. OF IRELAND G BELORUSSIA TAT-10 2 + 1 x 560 D S D Norden/ N O LA Grossheide ER POLAND M TH NE GERMANY Gemini North 2 x 6 (WDM) x 2.5 Gbit/s BELGIUM CZECH Dieppe REP. Port UKRAINE Alberni NPC 3 + 1 x 420 St Brieuc SLOVAK REP. M O KAZAKHSTAN L FRANCE D Seattle AC-1 AUSTRIA A V TPC-5 2 x 5 Gbit/s HUNGARY I Tillamook PTAT-1 3 + 1 x 420 Gbit/s SWITZ. I A A Odessa DM) x 2.5 St Hilaire de Riez SLOVEN 2 x 6 (W MONGOLIA i South FLAG Atlantic-1 160 Gbit/s emin CROATIA ROMANIA Pacific G Y I U Novorossijsk City Pennant Point HERZEGOVINABOSNIA- G s T O 2.5 SochiGbit/s PC-1 Medway Harbour Gbit/ S x 5 L TAT-11 3 DxM 560) A Varna Shirley x 3 (W A V Nakhodka TAT-12 2 x 3 (WDM) x 5 Gbit/s 2 I GEORGIA Ishikati TAT-13 A BULGARIA UZBEKISTAN Rhode Island F L PC-1 L ALBANIA Poti A KYRGYZSTAN N Long Island G Y TAT-9 2 + 1 x 560 ARMENIA AZERBAIJAN New York MACEDONIA TURKMENISTAN NORTH Bandon TAT-8 2 x 280 Istanbul KOREA FLAG Atlantic-1 160 Gbit/s Azores SPAIN E R-J-K C 2 x 560 0 EE 6 R 5 G Dalian A CANUS-1 TAT-14 PORTUGAL TURKEY JIH CableProject Japan-US Manasquan Lisbon UNITED STATES 3x TAJIKISTAN Point Sesimbra PC-1 Arena Tuckerton Marmaris Yantaï SOUTH P TPC-4 2 x 560 A S
Creating Trust in Critical Network Infrastructures: Korean Case Study

INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION ITU WORKSHOP ON Document: CNI/05 CREATING TRUST IN CRITICAL 20 May 2002 NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURES Seoul, Republic of Korea — 20 - 22 May 2002 CREATING TRUST IN CRITICAL NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURES: KOREAN CASE STUDY Creating trust in critical network infrastructures: Korean case study This case study has been prepared by Dr. Chaeho Lim <[email protected]>. Dr Cho is Visiting Professor at the Korean Institute of Advanced Science & Technology, in the Infosec Education and Hacking, Virus Research Centre. This case study, Creating Trust in Critical Network Infrastructures: Korean Case Study, is part of a series of Telecommunication Case Studies produced under the New Initiatives programme of the Office of the Secretary General of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Other country case studies on Critical Network Infrastructures can be found at <http://www.itu.int/cni>. The opinions expressed in this study are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Telecommunication Union, its membership or the Korean Government. The author wishes to acknowledge Mr Chinyong Chong <[email protected]> of the Strategy and Policy Unit of ITU for contributions to the paper. The paper has been edited by the ITU secretariat. The author gratefully acknowledges the generous assistance of all those who have contributed information for this report. In particular, thanks are due to staff of Ministry of Information and Communication and Korean Information Security Agency for their help and suggestions. 2/27 Creating trust in critical network infrastructures: Korean case study TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction.............................................................................................................................................................
KDDI Global ICT Brochure

https://global.kddi.com KDDI-Global Networks and IT Solutions Networking, Colocation, System Integration around the world BUILDING YOUR BUSINESS TOGETHER KDDI solutions are at the cutting-edge in all fields of information and communications KDDI, a Fortune Global 500 company, is one of Asia’s largest telecommunications providers, with approximately US$48 billion in annual revenue and a proven track record extending over many years and around the world. We deliver all-round services, from mobile phones to fixed-line communications, making us your one-stop solution provider for telecommunications and IT environments. The high praise and trust enjoyed by our TELEHOUSE data centers positioned around the world have kept us at the forefront of service and quality. Since our establishment in 1953, we have expanded our presence into 28 countries and 60 cities, with over 100 offices around the world supporting the success of our international customers through our high quality services. KDDI’s mobile telephone brand “au” has achieved significant market share in Japan, one of the world’s most comprehensive KDDI Quick Facts communications markets. KDDI’s relationship with over 600 carriers worldwide enables us to provide high-quality international network services in over 190 countries. Our exciting ventures, built on extensive experience, include investment in the “South-East Asia Japan 2 Cable”, which connects 11 locations in 9 countries and territories in Asia. Moreover, as the world moves toward the age of IoT and 5G, KDDI is taking steps to promote IoT business, such as connected cars, support for companies engaged in global business, and the creation of new value for our society.
March 30, 2015 by ELECTRONIC FILING Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12Th Street, S.W. Washin

(202) 223-7323 (202) 204-7371 [email protected] March 30, 2015 BY ELECTRONIC FILING Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Joint Application for Transfer of Control of Cable Landing Licenses from Columbus Networks, Limited to Cable & Wireless Communications Plc, File Nos. SCL-T/C-20141121-00013 and SCL-T/C-20141121-00014; Applications for Transfer of Control of Section 214 Authorizations from Columbus Networks, Limited to Cable & Wireless Communications Plc, File Nos. ITC-T/C-20141121-00304 and ITC-T/C-20141121-00307 Dear Ms. Dortch: On Thursday, March 26, 2015, the undersigned counsel and representatives of Cable & Wireless Communications Plc (“C&W”) and Columbus Networks, Limited (“CNL”) met with members of the Commission’s staff to discuss the above-cited pending applications, and in particular Digicel’s pleadings and ex parte filing in the proceeding. Doc#: US1:9949275v3 Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary 2 Attending this meeting on behalf of Cable & Wireless Communications Plc were Belinda Bradbury, General Counsel, and Simeon Irvine, Chief Executive, Wholesale. C&W outside counsel Patrick Campbell and Diane Gaylor of Paul,Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP also attended. Attending on behalf of Columbus Networks, Limited were Paul Scott, President and Chief Operating Officer, Columbus Networks USA, Inc., and Victor A. Lago, Vice President of Legal Affairs, Columbus Networks USA, Inc. CNL outside counsel Ulises Pin of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP also attended. Commission staff in attendance were, from the International Bureau, Nese Guendelsberger, Deputy Bureau Chief (by phone); Kathleen Collins, Assistant Bureau Chief; Walt Strack, Assistant Bureau Chief and Chief Economist; Howard Griboff, Acting Division Chief, Policy Division; David Krech, Associate Division Chief, Policy Division; Mark Uretsky, Senior Economist, Policy Division; Jodi Cooper, Senior Attorney, Policy Division; and, from the Office of General Counsel, James Bird.
Broadband Infrastructure in the ASEAN-9 Region

BroadbandBroadband InfrastructureInfrastructure inin thethe ASEANASEAN‐‐99 RegionRegion Markets,Markets, Infrastructure,Infrastructure, MissingMissing Links,Links, andand PolicyPolicy OptionsOptions forfor EnhancingEnhancing CrossCross‐‐BorderBorder ConnectivityConnectivity Michael Ruddy Director of International Research Terabit Consulting www.terabitconsulting.com PartPart 1:1: BackgroundBackground andand MethodologyMethodology www.terabitconsulting.com ProjectProject ScopeScope Between late‐2012 and mid‐2013, Terabit Consulting performed a detailed analysis of broadband infrastructure and markets in the 9 largest member countries of ASEAN: – Cambodia – Indonesia – Lao PDR – Malaysia – Myanmar – Philippines – Singapore – Thailand – Vietnam www.terabitconsulting.com ScopeScope (cont(cont’’d.)d.) • The data and analysis for each country included: Telecommunications market overview and analysis of competitiveness Regulation and government intervention Fixed‐line telephony market Mobile telephony market Internet and broadband market Consumer broadband pricing Evaluation of domestic network connectivity International Internet bandwidth International capacity pricing Historical and forecasted total international bandwidth Evaluation of international network connectivity including terrestrial fiber, undersea fiber, and satellite Evaluation of trans‐border network development and identification of missing links www.terabitconsulting.com SourcesSources ofof DataData • Terabit Consulting has completed dozens of demand studies for
Taiwan Earthquake Fiber Cuts: a Service Provider View

Taiwan Earthquake Fiber Cuts: a Service Provider View Sylvie LaPerrière, Director Peering & Commercial Operations nanog39 – Toronto, Canada – 2007/02/05 www.vsnlinternational.com Taiwan Earthquake fiber cuts: a service provider view Building a backbone from USA to Asia 2006 Asian Backbone | The reconstruction year Earthquake off Taiwan on Dec 26, 2006 The damage(s) Repairing subsea cables Current Situation Lessons for the future www.vsnlinternational.com Page 2 USA to Asia Backbones | Transpac & Intra Asia Cable Systems China-US | Japan-US | PC-1 | TGN-P Combined with Source Flag 2006 APCN-2 C2C EAC FNAL www.vsnlinternational.com Page 3 2006 Spotlight on Asia | Expansion Add Geographies Singapore (2 sites) Tokyo Consolidate presence Hong Kong Upgrade Bandwidth on all Segments Manila Sydney Planning and Design Musts Subsea cables diversity Always favour low latency (RTD …) Improve POP meshing intra-Asia www.vsnlinternational.com Page 4 AS6453 Asia Backbone | Physical Routes Diversity TransPac: C-US | J-US | TGN-P TOKYO Intra-Asia: EAC FNAL | APCN | APCN-2 FLAG FNAL | EAC | SMW-3 Shima EAC J-US HONG KONG EAC LONDON APCN-2 TGN-P APCN-2 Pusan MUMBAI SMW-4 J-US Chongming KUALA APCN-2 PALO ALTO LUMPUR Fangshan MUMBAI CH-US APCN-2 SMW-3 Shantou TIC APCN SMW-3 CH-US LOS ANGELES EAC SINGAPORE APCN-2 EAC LEGEND EXISTING MANILLA IN PROGRESS www.vsnlinternational.com As of December 26 th , 2006 Page 5 South East Asia Cable Systems – FNAL & APCN-2 TOKYO EAC FLAG FNAL Shima EAC J-US HONG KONG EAC LONDON APCN-2 TGN-P APCN-2 Pusan MUMBAI
Forum Second Issue

An international forum for the expression of ideas and First Quarter 2002 opinions pertaining to the submarine telecoms industry 1 Contents List of Advertisers Editors Exordium 3 Undersea Intelligence on the Costa del Sol International Cable Protection Committee 5 EMEA Conference 30 Emails to the Editor 4 Global Marine Systems Ltd 5,6 The State of the Industry Network Maintenance 5 Europe, the Middle East, Africa and India TMS International 16 Christian Annoque 31 Sub Tech 7 Offshore Site Investigation Conference 18 Tracking the Cableships Sub Tell 8 Latest locations of the world’s cableships 36 International Subsea & Telecom Services 22 Ventures 9 Technology in Long-span Smit-Oceaneering Cable Systems 29,39,47 Submarine Systems Vessels 10 CTC Marine Projects 35 Tony Frisch 40 Searching for a light in the fog A future for the submarine cable industry? Fibre Optics in Offshore Michael Ruddy 11 Communications Jon Seip 45 Bandwidth ORGANISING A The State of the Market Letter to a friend CON ERENCE? Rex Ramsden 19 Jean Devos 52 Give your exhibition or conference Countdown to Apollo Launch maximum exposure to the submarine Australasian Communications Conference The world’s most advanced cable system telecoms industry. Advertise your event in A once-only chance to hear from influential Katherine Edwards 23 Submarine Telecoms Forum strategists and CEOs 56 The State of the Industry and reach all the key people. The Americas Diary Dates Email: [email protected]@subtelforum.com John Manock 27 Upcoming Conferences 2002 57 2 An international forum for the expression of ideas and opinions pertaining to the submarine telecom industry Exordium Submarine Telecoms Forum is published quarterly by WFN Strategies, L.L.C.
DOC-367222A1.Pdf

PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12th STREET S.W. WASHINGTON D.C. 20554 News media information 202-418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov (or ftp.fcc.gov) TTY (202) 418-2555 Report No. SCL-00284NS Wednesday September 30, 2020 Non-Streamlined Submarine Cable Landing License Applications Accepted For Filing Unless otherwise specified, the following procedures apply to the applications listed below: The applications listed below have been found, upon initial review, to be acceptable for filing. Pursuant to the Submarine Cable Landing License Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 34-39, and Executive Order No. 10530, reprinted as amended in 3 U.S.C. § 301, each applicant seeks: (a) the grant of a cable landing licensee; (b) the modification of a cable landing license; and/or (c) the assignment or transfer of control of an interest in a submarine cable landing license. These applications are not subject to the streamlined processing procedures set forth in Section 1.767 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR § 1.767. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. These applications are being coordinated with the Department of State and other Executive Branch agencies pursuant to section 1.767(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.767(b), and consistent with procedures established with the Department of State. See Review of Commission Consideration of Applications under the Cable Landing License Act, IB Docket No.
Joufsofu!Lpsfb

Attachment 5 XIJUF!QBQFS! JOUFSOFU!LPSFB As the leading agency for national informatization, the National Computerization Agency provides policies and state of the art technology that will guide us to the successful construction of e-Korea. For more than ten the people of National Computerization Agency(NCA) have kept helping the public and private sector to make the best of new and exciting opportunities brought by information and communication technology all over the country. N ational Computerization Age n cy Ministry of Inform ation and Communication XIJUF!QBQFS! JOUFSOFU!LPSFB As the leading agency for national informatization, the National Computerization Agency provides policies and state of the art technology that will guide us to the successful construction of e-Korea. For more than ten the people of National Computerization Agency(NCA) have kept helping the public and private sector to make the best of new and exciting opportunities brought by information and communication technology all over the country. Message From the Minister Korea has established a world-class information and communication infrastructure thanks to the joint efforts of the government and private sectors to build an IT powerhouse during the 1990s. Korea's leading infrastructure in the information and communication sector has enabled Korea to achieve unprecedented developments in all areas including political, economic, social and cultural spheres. As of the end of 2003, 11.18 million households - more than 73% of the total number of households - subscribed to broadband Internet and 29.22 million people - 66% of the total population - had access to the Internet. According to the "ITU 2003 Internet Report," Korea ranks first in terms of broadband Internet penetration rate, has the third largest population of Internet users, and has the fourth highest PC penetration rate in the world.
Asia-America Gateway (AAG) Cable Network, South Lantau

210mm_FO-English_4194.ai 10/5/2007 11:01:15 AM Asia-America Gateway (AAG) Cable Network, South Lantau PROJECT PROFILE October 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Basic Information.....................................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Title........................................................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose and Nature of the Project ....................................................................................1 1.3 Name of Project Proponent ...............................................................................................1 1.4 Location and Scale of Project............................................................................................1 1.5 Cable Route Selection Process.........................................................................................2 1.6 Designated Projects to be Covered by the Project Profile.................................................2 1.7 Name and Telephone Number of Contact Person.............................................................2 2. Outline of Planning, Implementation Programme & Features of Environment..................3 2.1 Project Planning and Implementation................................................................................3 2.2 Programme........................................................................................................................5 2.3 Major Elements of the Surrounding Environment..............................................................6