Risk Identification in Megaprojects As a Crucial Phase of Risk Management: PAPERS a Literature Review
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by idUS. Depósito de Investigación Universidad de Sevilla Risk Identification in Megaprojects as a Crucial Phase of Risk Management: PAPERS A Literature Review Alvaro Sanchez-Cazorla, University of Seville, Spain Rafaela Alfalla-Luque, University of Seville, Spain Ana Isabel Irimia-Dieguez, University of Seville, Spain ABSTRACT ■ INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to perform megaproject is a large-scale project characterized by complexity, a literature review of risk management in uncertainty, ambiguity, dynamic interfaces, significant political megaprojects and systematize the risks stud- or external influences, and time periods extending to ten years or ied in the literature. A systematic search of longer (Floricel & Miller, 2001). Megaprojects are considered to Abe the most complex of all the various types of projects, since their overall the main databases has been performed. The contributions include: (1) a bibliometric behavior is difficult to understand, predict, and keep under control, even analysis of articles; (2) the systematization when reasonably complete information about the megaproject system has and classification into nine categories of been provided (Vidal, Marle, & Bocquet, 2011). the risks found in a content analysis of the The characteristics of megaprojects make them an interesting research topic, articles; and (3) the identification of possible because according to Esty (2004), they provide a decision-making environment areas of interest for research and practice. in certain areas of project management that cannot be found in any other type Risks are comprehensively categorized to of project. The differences between megaproject management and project man- assist practitioners during the identification agement include (Zhai, Xin, & Cheng, 2009): (1) a higher volume of investment, phase, while potential areas for future lines which means more sponsors and/or shareholders, which in turn contributes of research are presented for academics. toward the complexity of the project; (2) greater community involvement, due to the high impact that these projects usually have on the environment where KEYWORDS: megaproject; complex they are implemented (although the impact differs depending on the type of con- project; risk management; risk identification struction), which may result in public sector participation; (3) a more complex decision-making process, due to the size of the budget and amount of resources involved, since each decision made in a megaproject can drastically change its direction; and (4) a higher number of stakeholders involved, meaning that there is also a larger number of interests and expectations that have to be fulfilled, thereby increasing the complexity of the project. In addition, Flyvbjerg, Bruzelius, and Rothengatter (2003) state that the principal difference is that when megaprojects fail, they can cause the collapse of the agents that have been funded and some- times even the governments that are behind them, thus escalating the risk factors. Risk management is currently considered to be a mandatory part of proj- ect management in general (including megaprojects), and also an integral part of successful project management (Burcar, Radujkovic´, & Vukomanovic´, 2013). Risk management can be defined as the systematic process of identify- ing, analyzing, and responding to risks (Dey, 2010). It includes maximizing the likelihood and outcomes of positive events and minimizing the likeli- hood and outcomes of events that are detrimental to the project’s objectives (Project Management Institute, 2013a, 2013b). The best projects display an ability to manage risks more effectively, which in turn contributes toward positive outcomes and results in safer projects, lower costs, and projects Project Management Journal, Vol. 47, No. 6, 75–93 being completed on time (Greiman, 2013). © 2016 by the Project Management Institute The risk management of small- and medium-scale projects has been the sub- Published online at www.pmi.org/PMJ ject of research on numerous occasions (e.g., Marcelino-Sádaba, Pérez-Ezcurdia, December/January 2017 ■ Project Management Journal 75 Risk Identification in Megaprojects Echeverría Lazcano, & Villanueva, 2014). against loss, but also as a way to achieve third section describes the methodology PAPERS However, the number of articles on this greater rewards (Dey, 2012). It is also employed; the fourth section sets out the subject falls considerably when only stud- significant as, among other things, ana- analysis and discussion of the results; and ies on megaprojects are considered, since, lyzing and assessing potential risks in finally, conclusions, further research, and as this article demonstrates, this contin- the early stages of a megaproject help the implications of this study for practi- ues to be an area of research that is still to determine whether the megaproject tioners and academics are presented. developing and expanding. Furthermore, should be executed at all. The identifica- risks are more complex and have a greater tion phase is considered to be the most Prior Studies impact on megaprojects, which makes important stage of risk management, Megaprojects and Risk Management risk management even more important. because once a risk has been identified, The term megaproject was coined in the Be that as it may, there is no evidence that it can be managed (Chapman & Ward, 1970s to characterize the size and cost the literature has addressed risk man- 2003; Cooper & Chapman, 1987; Courtot, of large-scale energy development proj- agement in megaprojects, specifically, 2001; Haifang, Shimiao, & Danfeng, 2010; ects being undertaken around the world or differently than risk management in Perry & Hayes, 1986; Wideman, 1992). (Altshuler & Luberoff, 2003) and used to small- and medium-scale projects. Furthermore, the sooner risks are identi- describe very large capital projects cost- Studying risk management in mega- fied, the more the cost and effort of miti- ing millions of U.S. dollars (Dimitriou projects is justified by the growing inter- gating them can be reduced (Fukayama, et al., 2013). est being shown in megaprojects as a Fernandes, & Ebecken, 2008). No single definition as to what consti- research area due to their unique charac- This fundamental role of risk man- tutes a megaproject can be found in the teristics (Esty, 2004; Fiori & Kovaka, 2005); agement in megaprojects leads us to literature. According to van Marrewijk the important role that risk management establish the following objectives: (1) a et al., 2008), a megaproject is a mega- plays in the management of megaproj- systematic literature review of risk man- infrastructure project that costs many ects (Dimitriou, Ward, & Wright, 2013; agement in megaprojects and (2) the billions of dollars (Flyvbjerg et al., 2003; Greiman, 2013; Lehtiranta, 2014); the need systematization of the risks studied in Koppenjan, 2005; Turner, 1999); is usu- to address all types of risks so as to take the literature, since risk identification is ally delivered by private enterprises on a more holistic view (Lehtiranta, 2014); a crucial phase of the risk management behalf of a government; and is a venture the increasing growth in number and process. To achieve these goals, a system- involving uncertainty, complexity, and value of megaprojects (Flyvbjerg, 2014); atic literature review of major databases a wide range of partners that is highly and the great heterogeneity detected in (WoK, Scopus, and ABI/Inform) was con- sensitive in political terms (Clegg, Pitsis, recent studies on megaprojects, which ducted between the years 2000 and 2013, Rura-Polley, & Marosszeky, 2002). do not seem to adopt a framework that is including quantitative and qualitative The characteristics that may classify any different from smaller-scale projects. analyses of the selected articles using a project as a megaproject include: an As the size and complexity of a proj- ATLAS.ti software and a checklist. investment over US$1 billion, high uncer- ect increase, however, the associated risk These objectives contribute to the tainty, possible intangible benefits, and management effort increases exponen- previous literature by providing: (1) a attractive long-term outcomes (Eweje, tially (Kwak, 2003). bibliometric analysis of articles focus- Turner, & Müller, 2012; Miller & Lessard, Risk management is considered to ing on risk management in mega- 2000). The effects of a megaproject are be a major success factor for all types of projects; (2) the systematization and considerable and can have a highly visible projects and an attractive research and classification into nine categories of the positive or negative impact. Along with development topic (Lehtiranta, 2014), risks found in a content analysis of the the uncertainty inherent in megaprojects, especially with respect to megaprojects articles with a detailed description of these effects generate a wide range of risks because it can help project managers each risk; and (3) the identification of that need to be taken into account over anticipate any delays that might lead possible areas of interest for risk man- the life cycle of a megaproject. Research to projects not being delivered on time agement research and practice in mega- studies (Cooper, Edgett, & Kleinschmidt, (Grant, Cashman, & Christensen, 2006). projects (current weaknesses and future 2001; Torok, Nordman, & Lin, 2011) have The success of a megaproject