Roseslugs Fact Sheet by Wayne Ohnesorg, Extension Educator Bristly Roseslug Larva Found Feeding on a Climbing Rose in Madison County, Nebraska

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Roseslugs Fact Sheet by Wayne Ohnesorg, Extension Educator Bristly Roseslug Larva Found Feeding on a Climbing Rose in Madison County, Nebraska Roseslugs Fact Sheet By Wayne Ohnesorg, Extension Educator Bristly roseslug larva found feeding on a climbing rose in Madison County, Nebraska. Pest Identification & Damage Common Name(s): Roseslug, bristly roseslug, and curled rose sawfly Scientific Name: Endelomyia aethiops (Fabricius) Hymenoptera: Family Tenthredinidae. There are two other species, bristly roseslug (Cladius difformis) and curled rose sawfly (Allantus cinctus), that feed on roses and could be confused with E. aethiops. Identifying Characteristics for damaging Stage(s): Larvae are yellow-green in color and partially translucent showing their digestive tracts as a dark olive green. The head is colored yellow to yellow-orange. May be confused for Lepidoptera larvae, but can be distinguished by the number of prolegs present. Roseslug, bristly roseslug, and curled rose sawfly larvae have 7-8 pairs of prolegs. Roseslug larvae are smooth and shiny and do not have rings of white spots encircling the body as curled rose sawfly larvae do. Bristly roseslug larvae have numerous bristles covering their bodies. Mature roseslug larvae are ½ inch in length. Damage/Nature and Symptoms: Larvae feed at night on the upper and lower surfaces of rose leaves in between veins effectively skeletonizing the leaves. Mature larvae can chew holes through leaves. Distribution and Life Cycle Distribution: Roses slugs can be commonly found along the west coast and in the eastern US north of Florida and south of New York. West of Iowa to the Rocky Mountains roseslugs are an Rose leaves that have been fed on by roseslugs from occasional pest. Cedar County, NE Summary of Life Cycle: Roseslugs overwinter in the soil as a pupa. In spring, the adults emerge. Females lay eggs in the leaves near the edge of the leaflets. When the larvae hatch they skeletonize the surfaces of the leaves. Mature larvae can also chew holes in the leaves. When the larvae are fully mature they will leave the plant and burrow into the soil. They construct an earthen cell in which to pupate. There can be one generation or multiple generations each year depending on the species. Management Methods Inspection/Survey Methods: Visual inspection of rose plants looking for feeding damage. Non-Chemical Management Strategies: Small infestations can be picked off by hand with the larvae thrown into a bucket with soapy water. Larvae can be sprayed off of plants as they will be unable to crawl back up onto the plant. Chemical Management Strategies: When using insecticides make sure to cover both the topside and underside of the leaves. Insecticides with labels for home use are: acephate, bifenthrin, carbaryl, cyfluthrin, esfenvalerate, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin and spinosad. Horticultural oils and insecticidal soaps can also be used. Read and follow all label directions when using insecticides. References: Anonymous A. Sawflies and rose slugs. Texas A&M University Pest Profiles:Wasps. Accessed 4/6/2009 http://hortipm.tamu.edu/pestprofiles/chewing/sawflie/sawflie.html Anonymous B. University of Maryland, Maryland Cooperative Extension HGIC Plant Diagnostic Web site. http://plantdiagnostics.umd.edu/level3.cfm?causeID=194 Anonymous. 1997. Insect Pests of Roses: Defoliators/leaf feeders. University of Minnesota Extension website FO-06953. http://www.extension.umn.edu/distribution/horticulture/components/6953_01.html Anonymous. 2003. University of Wisconsin Insect Highlights June 16,2003. http://www.entomology.wisc.edu/diaglab/03hilite/6_16.html Day,E. 1996. European Rose Slugs. Virginia Tech Cooperative Extension website. Accessed 4/6/2009. http://www.ext.vt.edu/departments/entomology/factsheets/euroslug.html Hahn, J. 2007. Watch Out For Roseslugs. University of Minnesota Yard and Garden News Vol. 9 No. 6, May 15, 2007. http://www.extension.umn.edu/yardandgarden/YGLNews/YGLNewsMay152007.html McLeod-Scott, J. and J. Williamson. 2007. Rose Insects and Related Pests. Clemson University Extension HGIC 2107. http://www.clemson.edu/extension/hgic/pests/plant_pests/flowers/hgic2107.html .
Recommended publications
  • ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES and PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS of SHRUB EXPANSION in WESTERN ALASKA by Molly Tankersley Mcdermott, B.A./B.S
    Arthropod communities and passerine diet: effects of shrub expansion in Western Alaska Item Type Thesis Authors McDermott, Molly Tankersley Download date 26/09/2021 06:13:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7893 ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES AND PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS OF SHRUB EXPANSION IN WESTERN ALASKA By Molly Tankersley McDermott, B.A./B.S. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks August 2017 APPROVED: Pat Doak, Committee Chair Greg Breed, Committee Member Colleen Handel, Committee Member Christa Mulder, Committee Member Kris Hundertmark, Chair Department o f Biology and Wildlife Paul Layer, Dean College o f Natural Science and Mathematics Michael Castellini, Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT Across the Arctic, taller woody shrubs, particularly willow (Salix spp.), birch (Betula spp.), and alder (Alnus spp.), have been expanding rapidly onto tundra. Changes in vegetation structure can alter the physical habitat structure, thermal environment, and food available to arthropods, which play an important role in the structure and functioning of Arctic ecosystems. Not only do they provide key ecosystem services such as pollination and nutrient cycling, they are an essential food source for migratory birds. In this study I examined the relationships between the abundance, diversity, and community composition of arthropods and the height and cover of several shrub species across a tundra-shrub gradient in northwestern Alaska. To characterize nestling diet of common passerines that occupy this gradient, I used next-generation sequencing of fecal matter. Willow cover was strongly and consistently associated with abundance and biomass of arthropods and significant shifts in arthropod community composition and diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduction 2. Caliroa Crypta Sp. Nov
    © Entomologica Fennica. 15 October 1999 A new sawfly species Caliroa crypta sp. nov. from Northern Europe (Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae) Mikk Heidemaa A new tenthredinid species Caliroa crypta sp. nov. is described on the basis of one female from Estonia and one male from Finland. The new species slightly resembles C. tremulae Chevin but the sculpture of its abdominal terga is alutaceous-coriaceous like that in Endelomyia aethiops (Fabricius). The host plant and larva of the species are unknown.- Entomologica Fennica 10: 183-186. Department ofApplied Zoology, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 27, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland Institute ofZoology and Hydrobiology, University ofTartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014 Tartu, Estonia For correspondence: Institute of Plant Protection, Estonian Agricultural Uni­ versity, Viljandi Road, Eerika, 50412 Tartu, Estonia Received 17 April1998, accepted 26 May 1999 1. Introduction the above-mentioned female collected in Estonia. These two specimens share some unique charac­ Five species of the Holarctic sawfly genus Cali­ ters that clearly differentiate them from all other roa A. Costa have been reported from Europe related species that have been described to date (Chevin 1974, Liston 1995). To date four of those, from Europe. excluding Caliroa varipes (Klug, 1816), have been recorded from Finland (Viitasaari 1981, Viitasaari & Vikberg 1985). 2. Caliroa crypta sp. nov. During a collecting excursion in the park of the Palmse estate, Lahemaa National Park, North­ Figs. 1,2,3,4a,4b,5 em Estonia, on 18 July 1993 I caught an interest­ cryptus (Gr.) - absconditus (Lat.) -hidden, shad­ ing Caliroa female by sweeping. I could not iden­ ed, cryptic. tify it using the published keys for that genus be­ Type material.
    [Show full text]
  • Chlorantraniliprole: Reduced-Risk Insecticide for Controlling Insect Pests of Woody Ornamentals with Low Hazard to Bees
    242 Redmond and Potter: Acelepryn Control of Horticultural Pests Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 2017. 43(6):242–256 Chlorantraniliprole: Reduced-risk Insecticide for Controlling Insect Pests of Woody Ornamentals with Low Hazard to Bees Carl T. Redmond and Daniel A. Potter Abstract. Landscape professionals need target-selective insecticides for managing insect pests on flowering woody orna- mentals that may be visited by bees and other insect pollinators. Chlorantraniliprole, the first anthranilic diamide insec- ticide registered for use in urban landscapes, selectively targets the receptors that regulate the flow of calcium to control muscle contraction in caterpillars, plant-feeding beetles, and certain other phytophagous insects. Designated a reduced- risk pesticide by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, it has a favorable toxicological and environmental profile, including very low toxicity to bees and most types of predatory and parasitic insects that contribute to pest sup- pression. Chlorantraniliprole has become a mainstay for managing turfgrass pests, but little has been published concern- ing its performance against the pests of woody ornamentals. Researchers evaluated it against pests spanning five different orders: adult Japanese beetles, evergreen bagworm, eastern tent caterpillar, bristly roseslug sawfly, hawthorn lace bug, ole- ander aphid, boxwood psyllid, oak lecanium scale (crawlers), and boxwood leafminer, using real-world exposure scenarios. Chlorantraniliprole’s efficacy, speed of control, and residual activity as a foliar spray for the leaf-chewing pests was as good, or better, than provided by industry standards, but sprays were ineffective against the sucking pests (lace bugs, aphids, or scales). Basal soil drenches in autumn or spring failed to systemically control boxwood psyllids or leafminers, but autumn drenches did suppress roseslug damage and Japanese beetle feeding the following year.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan
    Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan June 2005 Martin Nugent, Chair Wildlife Diversity Coordinator Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife PO Box 59 Portland, OR 97207 (503) 872-5260 x5346 FAX: (503) 872-5269 [email protected] Kev Alexanian Dan Hilburn Sam Chan Bill Reynolds Suzanne Cudd Eric Schwamberger Risa Demasi Mark Systma Chris Guntermann Mandy Tu Randy Henry 7/15/05 Table of Contents Chapter 1........................................................................................................................3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 What’s Going On?........................................................................................................................................ 3 Oregon Examples......................................................................................................................................... 5 Goal............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Invasive Species Council................................................................................................................. 6 Statute ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Functions .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ana Kurbalija PREGLED ENTOMOFAUNE MOČVARNIH
    SVEUČILIŠTE JOSIPA JURJA STROSSMAYERA U OSIJEKU I INSTITUT RUĐER BOŠKOVI Ć, ZAGREB Poslijediplomski sveučilišni interdisciplinarni specijalisti čki studij ZAŠTITA PRIRODE I OKOLIŠA Ana Kurbalija PREGLED ENTOMOFAUNE MOČVARNIH STANIŠTA OD MEĐUNARODNOG ZNAČENJA U REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ Specijalistički rad Osijek, 2012. TEMELJNA DOKUMENTACIJSKA KARTICA Sveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku Specijalistički rad Institit Ruđer Boškovi ć, Zagreb Poslijediplomski sveučilišni interdisciplinarni specijalisti čki studij zaštita prirode i okoliša Znanstveno područje: Prirodne znanosti Znanstveno polje: Biologija PREGLED ENTOMOFAUNE MOČVARNIH STANIŠTA OD ME ĐUNARODNOG ZNAČENJA U REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ Ana Kurbalija Rad je izrađen na Odjelu za biologiju, Sveučilišta Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku Mentor: izv.prof. dr. sc. Stjepan Krčmar U ovom radu je istražen kvalitativni sastav entomof aune na četiri močvarna staništa od me đunarodnog značenja u Republici Hrvatskoj. To su Park prirode Kopački rit, Park prirode Lonjsko polje, Delta rijeke Neretve i Crna Mlaka. Glavni cilj specijalističkog rada je objediniti sve objavljene i neobjavljene podatke o nalazima vrsta kukaca na ova četiri močvarna staništa te kvalitativno usporediti entomofau nu pomoću Sörensonovog indexa faunističke sličnosti. Na području Parka prirode Kopački rit utvrđeno je ukupno 866 vrsta kukaca razvrstanih u 84 porodice i 513 rodova. Na području Parka prirode Lonjsko polje utvrđeno je 513 vrsta kukaca razvrstanih u 24 porodice i 89 rodova. Na području delte rijeke Neretve utvrđeno je ukupno 348 vrsta kukaca razvrstanih u 89 porodica i 227 rodova. Za područje Crne Mlake nije bilo dostupne literature o nalazima kukaca. Velika vrijednost Sörensonovog indexa od 80,85% ukazuje na veliku faunističku sličnost između faune obada Kopačkoga rita i Lonjskoga polja. Najmanja sličnost u fauni obada utvrđena je između močvarnih staništa Lonjskog polja i delte rijeke Neretve, a iznosi 41,37%.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects That Feed on Trees and Shrubs
    INSECTS THAT FEED ON COLORADO TREES AND SHRUBS1 Whitney Cranshaw David Leatherman Boris Kondratieff Bulletin 506A TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFOLIATORS .................................................... 8 Leaf Feeding Caterpillars .............................................. 8 Cecropia Moth ................................................ 8 Polyphemus Moth ............................................. 9 Nevada Buck Moth ............................................. 9 Pandora Moth ............................................... 10 Io Moth .................................................... 10 Fall Webworm ............................................... 11 Tiger Moth ................................................. 12 American Dagger Moth ......................................... 13 Redhumped Caterpillar ......................................... 13 Achemon Sphinx ............................................. 14 Table 1. Common sphinx moths of Colorado .......................... 14 Douglas-fir Tussock Moth ....................................... 15 1. Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University Cooperative Extension etnomologist and associate professor, entomology; David Leatherman, entomologist, Colorado State Forest Service; Boris Kondratieff, associate professor, entomology. 8/93. ©Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. 1994. For more information, contact your county Cooperative Extension office. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
    [Show full text]
  • New Immigrant Insects in Hawaii: 1962 Through 197612
    Vol. XIII, No. 1, April 1979 35 New Immigrant Insects in Hawaii: 1962 through 197612 John W. Beardsley, Jr. DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII HONOLULU, HAWAII In December 1961,1 delivered a presidential address before this Society which was titled "On Accidental Immigration and Establishment of Terrestrial Ar thropods in Hawaii During Recent Years" (Beardsley, 1962). In it I reviewed and analyzed accidental insect immigration into Hawaii for the 25 year period of 1937 through 1961. I thought that this time around it might be of interest to review the same subject for the 15 year period since my earlier presentation, and to again analyze our accidental immigrants in an attempt to determine whether or not trends which were indicated in 1961 have continued, and if the inferences which were drawn then have been substantiated. The data on which these remarks are based are contained largely in the Proceed ings of this Society, mostly in the Notes and Exhibitions sections. The annual lists of new immigrant species contained in the "Proceedings" were a valuable starting point, but they do contain occasional errors and quite a few omissions. Omissions have resulted because not all new immigrant records for Hawaii are reported in the Notes and Exhibitions. Quite a few new records appear only in submitted papers published in the ''Proceedings," or occasionally, in other journals (e.g.: Pacific In sects). I have attempted to include all such records which have come to my atten tion. I would like to urge all of you who either publish or find records of immigrant insects or other terrestrial invertebrates new to Hawaii in other journals to submit notes on these organisms for inclusion in this Society's "Proceedings." By so doing you will help to make a more complete and readily accessible record avail able for Hawaiian entomologists.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature
    \M RD IV WV The Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature IGzjJxjThe Official Periodical of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature Volume 56, 1999 Published on behalf of the Commission by The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature c/o The Natural History Museum Cromwell Road London, SW7 5BD, U.K. ISSN 0007-5167 '£' International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 56(4) December 1999 I TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Notices 1 The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature and its publications . 2 Addresses of members of the Commission 3 International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature 4 The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature 5 Towards Stability in the Names of Animals 5 General Article Recording and registration of new scientific names: a simulation of the mechanism proposed (but not adopted) for the International Code of Zoological Nomen- clature. P. Bouchet 6 Applications Eiulendriwn arbuscula Wright, 1859 (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa): proposed conservation of the specific name. A.C. Marques & W. Vervoort 16 AUGOCHLORiNi Moure. 1943 (Insecta. Hymenoptera): proposed precedence over oxYSTOGLOSSiNi Schrottky, 1909. M.S. Engel 19 Strongylogasier Dahlbom. 1835 (Insecta. Hymenoptera): proposed conservation by the designation of Teiuhredo muhifascuim Geoffroy in Fourcroy, 1785 as the type species. S.M. Blank, A. Taeger & T. Naito 23 Solowpsis inviclu Buren, 1972 (Insecta, Hymenoptera): proposed conservation of the specific name. S.O. Shattuck. S.D. Porter & D.P. Wojcik 27 NYMPHLILINAE Duponchel, [1845] (Insecta, Lepidoptera): proposed precedence over ACENTROPiNAE Stephens. 1835. M.A. Solis 31 Hemibagnis Bleeker, 1862 (Osteichthyes, Siluriformes): proposed stability of nomenclature by the designation of a single neotype for both Bagrus neimirus Valenciennes, 1840 and B.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) in the Biotopes of Kopa^Ki Rit
    NAT. CROAT. VOL. 15 No 4 189–201 ZAGREB December 31, 2006 original scientific paper / izvorni znanstveni rad SAWFLIES (HYMENOPTERA, SYMPHYTA) IN THE BIOTOPES OF KOPA^KI RIT FRANJO PEROVI]1,ENRIH MERDI]2 &GORDANA PEROVI]3 1Hrvatski prirodoslovni muzej, Demetrova 1, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia 2Odjel za biologiju, Sveu~ili{te J. J. Strossmayera, Trg Lj. Gaja 6, 31000 Osijek, Croatia 3Bra}e Radi}a 21, HR-10360 Sesvete, Croatia Perovi}, F., Merdi}, E. & Perovi}, G.: Sawflies (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) in the biotopes of Kopa~ki rit. Nat. Croat., Vol. 15, No. 4., 189–201, Zagreb, 2006. During 2003, entomological investigations were carried out into the sawflies (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) of Kopa~ki rit Nature Park, supported by the Ministry of Culture, project Insect Re- search, and by the Ministry of Science, Education and Sports project Entomofauna of Kopa~ki rit. At three groups of stations: inundated, forest and open ground (a total of 8 stations) a total of 220 individuals were sampled selectively with a net and with sticky tablets. From this material, 73 species of sawfly were determined. There is a clear differentiation of the inundated area at which the presence of only 15 species was recorded, but with great abundance, 7 species being recorded only in such kind of habitat (they were recorded only in the inundated area). This investigation also demonstrated that the borderline area between forest and meadow was the best habitat for the sawfly. At this kind of station in Tikve{, the presence of 35 species was recorded. Key words: sawflies, Kopa~ki rit, biotic diversity Perovi}, F., Merdi}, E.
    [Show full text]
  • Bees, Wasps & Ants
    Sheringham and Beeston Regis Commons SSSI / SAC FAUNA: Hymenoptera INSECTA (Pterygota) Family/Order English Name. Scientific Name. Authority. Grid Ref. Tetrad/ Last Km sq. Common. Record. HYMENOPTERA. PAMPHILIDAE: Sawfly. Pamphilius inanitus (Villers, 1789) TG1642 1987? (Bees, Wasps and Ants) ARGIDAE: Elm Zig-zag Sawfly. Aproceros leucopoda Takeuchi, 1939 TG1642 14R/B 2020 Bramble Sawfly. Arge cyaneocrocea (Forster, 1771) TG1642 2016 Sawfly. Arge gracilicornis (Klug, 1814 ) TG1642 1987? CIMBICIDAE: Honeysuckle Sawfly. Abia lonicerae (Linnaeus) TG1641 14Q/B 2015 Club-horned Sawfly. Abia sericera (Linnaeus) TG1642 14R/B 2014 Club-horned Sawfly. Zaraea fasciata Linnaeus, 1758 TG1641/42 14R,14Q/B 2014 Birch Sawfly. Cimbex femoratus (Linnaeus, 1758) TG1642 14R/B 2017 SIRICIDAE: Greater Horntail Wasp. Urocerus gigas (Linnaeus, 1758) TG1642 14R/S 1992 CEPHIDAE: Sawfly. Calameuta pallipes (Klug, 1803) TG1642 1987? TENTHREDINIDAE: Willow Sawfly. Pontania proxima (Lepeletier, 1823) TG1642 14R/BS 2009 Willow Sawfly. Eupontania pedunculi (Hartig, 1837) TG1642 14R/B 1999 Willow Sawfly. Eupontainia viminalis (Linnaeus, 1758) TG1642 14R/B 2002 Willow Sawfly. Pontainia bridgemanii (Cameron, 1883) TG1642 14R/B 1999 Sawfly. Caliroa annulipes (Klug, 1816) TG1642 14R/S 2002 Hazel Sawfly. Craesus septentrionalis (Linnaeus, 1758) TG1641 14Q/B 2017 Sawfly. Blennocampa phyllocolpa Viitasaari & Vikberg, 1985 TG1642/41 14R,14Q/B 2003 Sawfly. Selandria serva (Fabricius, 1793) TG1642 14R/B 2013 Sawfly. Aneugmenus padi (Linnaeus, 1761) TG1642 1987? Bracken Sawfly. Strongylogaster multifasciata (Geoffroy, 1785) TG1642 14R/BS 2020 Sawfly. Dichrodolerus vestigialis (Klug, 1818) TG1642 1996 Sawfly. Dolerus germanicus (Fabricius, 1775) TG1642 1987? Sawfly. Eutomostethus ephippium (Panzer, 1798) TG1642 14R/BS 2020 Sawfly. Poodolerus aeneus Hartig, 1837 TG1642 1987? Sawfly. Dolerus brevitarus Hartig TG1642 1987? Sawfly.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIES of PHYTOPHAGOUS INSECTS ASSOCIATED with STRAWBERRIES in LATVIA Valentîna Petrova, Lîga Jankevica, and Ineta Samsone
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE LATVIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. Section B, Vol. 67 (2013), No. 2 (683), pp. 124–129. DOI: 10.2478/prolas-2013-0019 SPECIES OF PHYTOPHAGOUS INSECTS ASSOCIATED WITH STRAWBERRIES IN LATVIA Valentîna Petrova, Lîga Jankevica, and Ineta Samsone Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, Miera ielâ 3, Salaspils, LV-2169, LATVIA [email protected] Communicated by Viesturs Melecis The aim of the present study was to describe the phytophagous insect fauna of strawberries in Latvia. This study was carried out in 2000–2004 on strawberry plantations in Tukums, Rîga, Do- bele, and Limbaþi districts. Insects were collected from strawberry fields by pitfall trapping, sweep netting and leaf sampling methods. A total of 137 insect species belonging to seven orders and 41 families were identified to species. Of the phytophagous insects, the order Orthoptera was represented by one species, other orders by a larger number of species: Hymenoptera (3), Dip- tera (16), Lepidoptera (20), Thysanoptera (21), Hemiptera (39), and Coleoptera (37). Of the re- corded insects, 48 species have a status of general strawberry pests. Key words: Fragaria × ananassa, strawberry pests, insect diversity. INTRODUCTION planted in rows with 30-cm distance between plants and 100-cm distance between rows. In the period from June 1 to Strawberries are one of the commercially important crop September 30 in 2000–2004, random sweep netting plants in Latvia. Harmful phytophagous insect species on (monthly) and leaf sampling (twice a month) were performed strawberry have been studied during the period between for general collection of homopterans, thysanopterans, 1928 and 1989. Thirty-four phytophagous insect species lepidopterans and hemipterans.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathways Analysis of Invasive Plants and Insects in the Northwest Territories
    PATHWAYS ANALYSIS OF INVASIVE PLANTS AND INSECTS IN THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES Project PM 005529 NatureServe Canada K.W. Neatby Bldg 906 Carling Ave., Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6 Prepared by Eric Snyder and Marilyn Anions NatureServe Canada for The Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Wildlife Division, Government of the Northwest Territories March 31, 2008 Citation: Snyder, E. and Anions, M. 2008. Pathways Analysis of Invasive Plants and Insects in the Northwest Territories. Report for the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Wildlife Division, Government of the Northwest Territories. Project No: PM 005529 28 pages, 5 Appendices. Pathways Analysis of Invasive Plants and Insects in the Northwest Territories i NatureServe Canada Acknowledgements NatureServe Canada and the Government of the Northwest Territories, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, would like to acknowledge the contributions of all those who supplied information during the production of this document. Canada : Eric Allen (Canadian Forest Service), Lorna Allen (Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre, Alberta Community Development, Parks & Protected Areas Division), Bruce Bennett (Yukon Department of Environment), Rhonda Batchelor (Northwest Territories, Transportation), Cristine Bayly (Ecology North listserve), Terri-Ann Bugg (Northwest Territories, Transportation), Doug Campbell (Saskatchewan Conservation Data Centre), Suzanne Carrière (Northwest Territories, Environment & Natural Resources), Bill Carpenter (Moraine Point Lodge, Northwest
    [Show full text]