Battle of Luzon - Wikipedia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Battle of Luzon - Wikipedia 11/5/2017 Battle of Luzon - Wikipedia Battle of Luzon The Battle of Luzon, fought 9 January – 15 August 1945, was a land battle of the Pacific Theater of Operations of Battle of Luzon World War II by the Allied forces of the U.S., its colony the Philippines, and allies against forces of the Empire of Part of World War II, Pacific Japan. The battle resulted in a U.S. and Filipino victory. Theater The Allies had taken control of all strategically and economically important locations of Luzon by March 1945, although pockets of Japanese resistance held out in the mountains until the unconditional surrender of Japan.[6] While not the highest in U.S. casualties, it is the highest net casualty battle U.S. forces fought in World War II, with 192,000 to 205,000 Japanese combatants dead (mostly from starvation and disease),[7] 10,000 American combatants killed, and between 120,000 to 140,000 Filipino civilians and combatants killed. A squad leader points out a Contents suspected Japanese position at 1 Background edge of Baleta Pass, near Baguio 2 Prelude where troops of the 25th Inf. Div. 2.1 Deception operations 3 Battle are in fierce combat with the 4 Aftermath enemy. 23 March 1945. 5 See also 6 References Date January 9th, 1945 – 7 Further reading August 15th, 1945 8 External links Location Luzon, Philippines Result Decisive Allied Background victory The Philippines were considered to be of great strategic importance because their capture by Japan would pose a Territorial Allies liberate the significant threat to the U.S. As a result, 135,000 troops changes Luzon island group and 227 aircraft were stationed in the Philippines by October 1941. However, Luzon—the largest island in the Belligerents Philippines—was captured by Imperial Japanese forces in 1942 during their campaign to capture the Philippines. United States Japan General Douglas MacArthur—who was in charge of the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Luzon 1/5 11/5/2017 Battle of Luzon - Wikipedia defense of the Philippines at the time—was ordered to Commonwealth Second Australia, and the remaining U.S. forces retreated to the Bataan Peninsula.[8] of the Philippines Philippine Republic A few months after this, MacArthur expressed his belief Australia that an attempt to recapture the Philippines was necessary. Mexico[1] The U.S. Pacific Commander Admiral Chester Nimitz and Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Ernest King both Commanders and leaders opposed this idea, arguing that it must wait until victory was certain. MacArthur had to wait two years for his wish; Douglas Tomoyuki it was 1944 before a campaign to recapture the Philippines MacArthur Yamashita was launched. The island of Leyte was the first objective of the campaign, which was captured by the end of December Walter 1944. This was followed by the attack on Mindoro, and Krueger later, Luzon.[8] Sergio Prelude Osmeña Before U.S. forces could launch the attack on Luzon, a base Luis Taruc of operation needed to be established close to the island. Strength Airbases in particular had to be established in order to provide the advancing troops with air support. Troops 280,000[2] 275,000[3] under Brigadier General William C. Dunckel captured the [4] island of Mindoro, with the assistance of the 7th Fleet. By 232 tanks 28 December, two airbases were controlled by the U.S. and Casualties and losses were ready to assist in the attack on Luzon, which was [a] scheduled to be launched on 9 January 1945. With the 47,190 214,585 capture of Mindoro, U.S. forces were positioned south of (10,380 killed, (205,535 dead, Luzon. However, MacArthur intended to land his forces at Lingayen, further north.[9] This would place his troops close 36,550 9,050 captured) to several roads and railways on Luzon, which led to Manila wounded, 260 (Mostly from —the main objective—through the plains in the center of the island.[6] died of diseases and disease)[5] starvation) Deception operations 232 tanks lost U.S. aircraft constantly made reconnaissance and bombing flights over southern Luzon, intending to deceive the Japanese forces into believing that the attack on Luzon would come from the south. In addition, transport aircraft were used to make parachute drops with dummies. Minesweepers were used to clear the bays of Balayan, Batangas, and Tayabas, located to the south of Luzon, and Filipino resistance fighters conducted sabotage operations in southern Luzon. These deception operations failed to convince General Yamashita, the leader of the Imperial Japanese Army in the Philippines, and he built significant defensive positions in the hills and mountains surrounding the Lingayen Gulf in Northern Luzon.[9] Battle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Luzon 2/5 11/5/2017 Battle of Luzon - Wikipedia The assault on Luzon was launched, as planned, on 9 January 1945, codenamed S-day. The Japanese forces reported more than 70 Allied warships entering the Lingayen Gulf. Pre-assault bombardment of Japanese shore positions from these ships began at 7:00. The landings were commenced an hour later.[10] The landing forces faced strong opposition from Japanese kamikaze aircraft. The escort carrier Ommaney Bay was destroyed by a kamikaze attack, while a destroyer and several other warships were also sunk.[9] Aircraft from the 3rd Fleet assisted the landings with close air support, strafing and bombing Japanese gun positions.[11] The battleships Pennsylvania and The landings at the Lingayen Gulf on 9 January were carried out by the 6th Colorado lead three heavy cruisers Army under the command of General Walter Krueger. Approximately into the Lingayen Gulf for the pre- 175,000 troops from the 6th Army landed along the 20-mile (32 km) assault bombardment of Japanese beachhead within a few days, while the I Corps protected their flanks. XIV shore positions Corps under General Oscar Griswold then advanced south toward Manila, despite Krueger's concerns that his eastern flank was unprotected and vulnerable if the Japanese forces attacked. However, no such attack occurred, and the U.S. forces did not meet much resistance until they reached the Clark Air Base on 23 January. The battle there lasted until the end of January, and after capturing the base, XIV Corps advanced toward Manila.[6] A second amphibious landing took place on 15 January, 45 mi (72 km) southwest of Manila. On 31 January, two regiments of the 11th Airborne Division made an airborne assault, capturing a bridge, and later advanced toward Manila. On 3 February, the 1st Cavalry Division captured the bridge across Tullahan River leading to the city. They advanced into the city that evening, Captain Andrade of Escuadrón 201 stands in front and the battle for the capture of Manila began. On 4 February, of his P-47D with his maintenance team after the paratroopers of the 11th Airborne—approaching the city returning from a combat mission over Luzon. from the south—came to the main Japanese defences south of the city of Manila where their advance was halted by heavy resistance. General Yamashita had ordered his troops to destroy all bridges and other vital installations as soon as the U.S. forces entered the city, and Japanese forces entrenched throughout the city continued to resist U.S. forces. General MacArthur announced the imminent recapture of Manila on the same day. On 11 February, the 11th Airborne Division captured the last Japanese outer defences, thus encircling the whole city. U.S. and Filipino forces carried out clearing operations in the city in the following weeks.[6] Military casualties totalled 1,010 Americans, 3,079 Filipinos and 12,000 Japanese. The first wave of troops approaching Aftermath the beaches of Luzon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Luzon 3/5 11/5/2017 Battle of Luzon - Wikipedia Battles continued throughout the island of Luzon in the following weeks, with more U.S. troops having landed on the island. Filipino and American resistance fighters also attacked Japanese positions and secured several locations.[12] The Allies had taken control of all strategically and economically important locations of Luzon by early March. Small groups of the remaining Japanese forces retreated to the mountainous areas in the north and southeast of the island, where they were besieged for months. Pockets of Japanese soldiers held out in the mountains—most ceasing resistance with the unconditional surrender of Japan, but a scattered few holding out for many years afterwards.[6] Casualties were stunningly high for the Japanese. Japanese losses were 205,535 dead, with 9,050 taken prisoners.[13] U.S. losses were far lower, with 10,640 dead and 36,550 wounded. Civilian casualties are estimated at 120,000 to 140,000 dead. See also Battle of Bessang Pass Battle of Balete Pass Battle of Manila (1945) List of American guerrillas in the Philippines Escuadrón 201 Japanese holdout Manila massacre William R. Shockley References 1. Escuadrón 201, a Mexican fighter–bomber squadron that participated during the last phase of the battle. 2. Manchester: American Caesar pg. 406 3. Manchester: American Ceaser pg. 406 4. Taki, THE HISTORY OF BATTLES OF IMPERIAL JAPANESE TANKS (http://www3.plala.or.jp/takihome/history2.ht m). 5. "Luzon" (http://www.history.army.mil/brochures/luzon/72-28.htm) Retrieved 25 Oct. 2015. 6. "Luzon 1944–1945" (http://www.history.army.mil/brochures/luzon/72-28.htm). Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/ 20081215091059/http://www.history.army.mil/brochures/luzon/72-28.htm) from the original on 15 December 2008. Retrieved 6 December 2008. 7. Spector, Eagle Against the Sun pg. 529 8. "The Philippines" (https://web.archive.org/web/20090222190510/http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/2WWphilippi nes.htm).
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

—— Preview end. ——

Recommended publications
  • Record of the Istanbul Process 16/18 for Combating Intolerance And
    2019 JAPAN SUMMARY REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS EVENT SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 3 PLENARY SESSIONS ................................................................................................................................. 7 LAUNCHING THE 2019 G20 INTERFAITH FORUM.......................................................................... 7 FORMAL FORUM INAUGURATION – WORKING FOR PEACE, PEOPLE, AND PLANET: CHALLENGES TO THE G20 ............................................................................................................... 14 WHY WE CAN HOPE: PEACE, PEOPLE, AND PLANET ................................................................. 14 ACTION AGENDAS: TESTING IDEAS WITH EXPERIENCE FROM FIELD REALITIES ........... 15 IDEAS TO ACTION .............................................................................................................................. 26 TOWARDS 2020 .................................................................................................................................... 35 CLOSING PLENARY ............................................................................................................................ 42 PEACE WORKING SESSIONS ................................................................................................................ 53 FROM VILE TO VIOLENCE: FREEDOM OF RELIGION & BELIEF & PEACEBUILDING ......... 53 THE DIPLOMACY OF RELIGIOUS PEACEBUILDING ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lawsuit Seeks Japanese Government Compensation for Siberian Detention
    Volume 7 | Issue 48 | Number 1 | Article ID 3261 | Nov 30, 2009 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Lawsuit Seeks Japanese Government Compensation for Siberian Detention: Who was Responsible for Abandoning Japanese Soldiers and Settlers in Mainland Asia After World War II? 連載特集 法廷で裁かれる日本の戦争責任40。賠償起訴の 始まり シベリア抑留国家賠償請求起訴日本政府の棄兵、棄民政策を問 う。 Murai Toyoaki Lawsuit Seeks Japanese Government Declaration—August 15, 19453—the Soviet Compensation for SiberianUnion declared war against Japan on August 8, Detention: Who was Responsible for 1945, renouncing the Japan-Soviet Neutrality Treaty of 1941. The USSR immediately crossed Abandoning Japanese Soldiers and the borders of northeast China (Manchuria), Settlers in Mainland Asia After northern Korea, and southern Sakhalin (which World War II? were all Japanese colonies), and the Kuril Islands. They engaged in combat with the Japanese army in these areas. Even after the Murai Toyoaki Potsdam Declaration’s de facto ending of World War II, fighting between Japan and the Soviet Nobuko ADACHI translator Union continued through early September until Why Compensation? a cease fire was declared. 4 We submitted a “Request for Compensation for Joseph Stalin, the leader of the Soviet Union Siberian Detention” to the Kyoto Local Court and the Head of the National Defense on December 26, 2007, seeking redress from Committee of the USSR, on August 23, 1945 the Japanese government. We are asking for issued the top secret order “Regarding the ¥30,000,0001 for each plaintiff as compensation Arrest of Half a Million Japanese Soldiers: How (and accepting ¥10,000,0002 compensation as and Where to Detain Them, and How to Utilize partial settlement).
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads of Technical Information
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2018 Nuclear Spaces: Simulations of Nuclear Warfare in Film, by the Numbers, and on the Atomic Battlefield Donald J. Kinney Follow this and additional works at the DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact lib-ir@fsu.edu FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES NUCLEAR SPACES: SIMULATIONS OF NUCLEAR WARFARE IN FILM, BY THE NUMBERS, AND ON THE ATOMIC BATTLEFIELD By DONALD J KINNEY A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2018 Donald J. Kinney defended this dissertation on October 15, 2018. The members of the supervisory committee were: Ronald E. Doel Professor Directing Dissertation Joseph R. Hellweg University Representative Jonathan A. Grant Committee Member Kristine C. Harper Committee Member Guenter Kurt Piehler Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii For Morgan, Nala, Sebastian, Eliza, John, James, and Annette, who all took their turns on watch as I worked. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the members of my committee, Kris Harper, Jonathan Grant, Kurt Piehler, and Joseph Hellweg. I would especially like to thank Ron Doel, without whom none of this would have been possible. It has been a very long road since that afternoon in Powell's City of Books, but Ron made certain that I did not despair. Thank you. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract..............................................................................................................................................................vii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese Geopolitics and the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere
    64-12,804 JO. Yung-Hwan, 1932- JAPANESE GEOPOLITICS AND THE GREATER EAST ASIA CO-PROSPERITY SPHERE. The American University, Ph.D., 1964 Political Science, international law and relations University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Copyright by Yung-Hwan Jo 1965 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. JAPANESE GEOPOLITICS AND THE GREATER EAST ASIA CO-PROSPERITY SPHERE by Yung-Hwan Jo Submitted to the Faoulty of the Graduate School ef The Amerioan University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Dootor of Philosophy in International Relations and Organization Signatures of Committee: Chairman LiwLi^^ sdt-C'Ut'tUVC'Uo-iU i L’yL ■ ; June 1964 AMERICAN UNIVERSITY The Amerioan University LIBRARY Washington, D. C. JUL9 1964 WASHINGTON. D. C. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. PREFACE This is a study of the Greater East Asia Co- Prosperity Sphere with emphasis on the influence of geo­ political thought in the formation of its concept. It is therefore a rather technical study of one aspect of Japanese diplomacy. Practically no studies have been made con­ cerning the influence of geopolitics on Japanese foreign policy. It is not the purpose of this study to attaok or defend the geopolitics or the concept of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere at any stage of its development, but rather to understand it. The principal data used in preparing this work are: (l) Various records of the International Military Tribunal of the Far East; (2) microfilmed arohives of the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 1868-1945; (3) materials written by Japanese geopoliticians as well as Haushofer; and (4) letters from authorities in the different aspects of this work.
    [Show full text]
  • 202 May 2016 New Jersey’S Foremost Philatelist
    NJPH The Journal of the NEW JERSEY POSTAL HISTORY SOCIETY ISSN: 1078-1625 Vol. 44 No. 2 Whole Number 202 May 2016 New Jersey’s Foremost Philatelist The story of Hiram E. Deats explores the contributions of this Flemington philatelist and bibliophile, told in postal cards. See page 66. ~ CONTENTS ~ President’s Message ................................................................................ Robert G. Rose ............... 64 World Stamp Show NY2016! ................................................................. ........................................ 65 Postal Cards and Hiram E. Deats ................................................................... Larry T. Nix ...................... 66 Bamberger’s Department Store and the Graf Zeppelin ............................ Linda B. Forgosh ............ 75 NJ Straight Line Handstamps: Westfield, NJ ................................................ Robert G. Rose ................. 80 The Last U.S. Warship Sunk On 28 July 1945: NJ-Built Battleship, USS Indianapolis (CA 35), Part I .................................................................................... Capt. Lawrence B. Brennan, USN (Ret.) ..... 83 N.J. Local Posts #9: Newark Dispatch Post ............................................. Larry Lyons .................. 104 Franklin Furnace: A Look Back ............................................................... Jean Walton .................. 107 May 2016 Web Update ............................................................................ Warren Plank ................ 113
    [Show full text]
  • The Changkufeng and Nomonhan Incidents – the Undeclared Border War and Its Impact on World War Ii
    University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2014-01-01 The hC angkufeng And Nomonhan Incidents - The Undeclared Border War And Its Impact on World War II Tobias Block University of Texas at El Paso, tblock@miners.utep.edu Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Asian History Commons, Asian Studies Commons, Military History Commons, Slavic Languages and Societies Commons, and the Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Commons Recommended Citation Block, Tobias, "The hC angkufeng And Nomonhan Incidents - The ndeU clared Border War And Its Impact on World War II" (2014). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 1588. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/1588 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact lweber@utep.edu. THE CHANGKUFENG AND NOMONHAN INCIDENTS – THE UNDECLARED BORDER WAR AND ITS IMPACT ON WORLD WAR II TOBIAS BLOCK DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY APPROVED: __________________________________________ Joshua Fan, Ph.D., Chair __________________________________________ Paul Edison, Ph.D. __________________________________________ Jose Villalobos, Ph.D. __________________________________ Bess Sirmon-Taylor, Ph.D. Interim Dean of the Graduate School THE CHANGKUFENG AND NOMONHAN INCIDENTS - THE UNDECLARED BORDER WAR AND ITS IMPACT ON WORLD WAR II by Tobias Block, BA Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department Of HISTORY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS OF EL PASO May 2014 Table of Contents Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • The Red Armys Victory That Shaped World War II PDF Book
    NOMONHAN, 1939: THE RED ARMYS VICTORY THAT SHAPED WORLD WAR II PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Stuart D Goldman | 240 pages | 15 Oct 2013 | Naval Institute Press | 9781591143390 | English | Annopolis, United States Nomonhan, 1939: The Red Armys Victory That Shaped World War II PDF Book A great work on an event of far greater importance than its fame in history suggests. Voroshilov, and Part of the Soviet—Japanese border conflicts. The film was inspired by the allegedly [98] true tale of a Korean named Yang Kyoungjong who was captured by the Americans on D- Day. Two characters who were in the Imperial Japanese Army during the war, relate their experiences in the Mongolian border area at a much later date to the protagonist, which seems to profoundly affect his later adventures. In comparison, at the point of contact, the Kwantung Army had only General Komatsubara's 23rd Infantry Division, which with various attached forces was equivalent to two light-infantry divisions. The Japanese air-force suffered dead and 66 severely wounded. Views Read Edit View history. It does a great job of putting the events in perspective for both countries and their role in the international scene and decisions leading up to WWII. Very interesting and I do believe his conclusion of the importance of this battle on the alliances and outbreak of WWII. The Soviet Union and Japan agreed to a cease-fire on 15 September, which took effect the following day at pm. The Diplomat. In , the two countries signed agreements respecting the borders of Mongolia and Manchukuo [76] and pledging neutrality towards each other.
    [Show full text]
  • The Digital Transformation of Labor; Automation, the Gig Economy And
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Larsson, Anthony (Ed.); Teigland, Robin (Ed.) Book — Published Version The digital transformation of labor: Automation, the gig economy and welfare Routledge Studies in Labour Economics Provided in Cooperation with: Taylor & Francis Group Suggested Citation: Larsson, Anthony (Ed.); Teigland, Robin (Ed.) (2020) : The digital transformation of labor: Automation, the gig economy and welfare, Routledge Studies in Labour Economics, ISBN 978-0-429-31786-6, Routledge, London, http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429317866 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/213906 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese Intelligence in WWII: Successes and Failures
    Japanese Intelligence in WWII: Successes and Failures KOTANI Ken* Summary This report considers the role Imperial Japanese Army intelligence played in the early stages of the Pacific War. In European and American intelligence research, a failure in intelligence, namely underestimation of the Imperial Japanese Army, is stressed as the reason for the defeat of the Allied forces in the early stages of the Pacific War. However, this conclusion differs somewhat from Japanese research, in which the general perception of the situation is that the Imperial Japanese Army triumphed thanks to repeatedly training for those early stages, coupled with the fact that its enemies were colonial gar- risons comprised mainly of local soldiers. Nevertheless, there exist many cases of failure in terms of intelligence by the Imperial Japanese Army during the Pacific War. This report will probe the details of this, based on examples of intelligence management by the Imperial Japanese Army. Introduction World War II was an all-out war. At the same time though, it was heavily colored by the element of information warfare. In this war in particular, it is no exaggeration to suggest that signals intelligence (SIGINT) to monitor enemy correspondence held the key to victory on the battlefield. Methods of reading the intentions of the enemy by intercepting encrypted communications, and furthermore of concealing the plans of partners were fundamentally reflected in the prosecution of the War. How- ever, in reality there was a considerable degree of trouble accompanying efforts to implement this. A high level of ability was required in all areas, beginning with the ability to gather information on matters such as decryption, then to analyze and develop the raw information into a processed form, the process involved in intelligence, as well as other abilities including operations planning capabili- ties to facilitate the application of such information in strategies and tactics.
    [Show full text]
  • China-Burma-India Rep
    US Japan China-Burma-India Rep. of China The forgotten front of World War 2 Great Britain India Burma Introduction CBI had two separate but related wars: o The Second Sino-Japanese War (1937 – 1945) o The War for Burma (1942 – 1945) However, to fully understand the impact on the post-war world we also have to look at the Chinese Civil War (1927- 1937 & 1945-1950) Main Combatants and their objectives Japan- Complete control of China as a colony; Resources and o isolation of China (Burma) o China - Self-preservation (KMT & CCP to take control of China) US – Protect China, keep her in the war, and tie up Japan there as o much as possible o Britain – Protect India and recover Burma (preserve the empire). o Thailand – Support Japan (Asia for Asians). What we’re going to do • The emergence of modern Japan up to 1933 • The emergence of modern China up to 1937 • The runup to and Phase one of the Second Sino-Japanese War • The Japanese strategic shift to South-East Asia and the conquest of Burma • Japanese invasion of India • Phase Two of the Sino-Japanese War (Operation Ichi-Go) • The Allied re-conquest of Burma • The end of World War Two in the CBI • The Chinese Civil War (1945-1949) • The impact of CBI on WW2 & the post-war world Opening Comments •Strategic level emphasis •Facts vs. Opinions •Questions •Why was it the “forgotten front”? C. W. Riffer Why am I interested in CBI? 3d Pursuit Squadron • Flying Tigers January 1942 Chinese/English • Wade-Giles vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert C. Wedemeyer Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf3x0n99pv No online items Register of the Albert C. Wedemeyer papers Finding aid prepared by Rebecca J. Mead Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 1998 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 hoover-library-archives@stanford.edu URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Register of the Albert C. 83007 1 Wedemeyer papers Title: Albert C. Wedemeyer papers Date (inclusive): 1897-1988 Collection Number: 83007 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 149 manuscript boxes, 1 card file box, 14 oversize boxes, 1 oversize folder, 2 motion picture film reels, 19 sound discs, 1 sound cassette, 2 maps, memorabilia(87.2 Linear Feet) Abstract: Orders, plans, memoranda, reports, correspondence, speeches and writings, clippings, printed matter, photographs, and memorabilia relating to Allied strategic planning during World War II, military operations in China, American foreign policy in China, and post-war American politics and foreign relations. Creator: Wedemeyer, Albert C. (Albert Coady), 1896-1989 Hoover Institution Library & Archives Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Library & Archives. Acquisition Information Materials were acquired by the Hoover Institution Library & Archives in 1983, with increments received in later years. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Albert C. Wedemeyer papers, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Library & Archives. 1896 July 9 Born, Omaha, Nebraska 1918 Commissioned Second Lieutenant, U. S. Army 1919 Graduated from United States Military Academy, West Point, New York 1919-1922 Assigned to Infantry School and 29th Infantry, Fort Benning, Georgia 1920 Promoted to First Lieutenant 1922-1923 Aide-de-Camp to Brigadier General Paul B.
    [Show full text]
  • Military History Anniversaries 1 Thru 15 MAR
    Military History Anniversaries 1 thru 15 MAR Events in History over the next 15 day period that had U.S. military involvement or impacted in some way on U.S military operations or American interests Mar 01 1781 – American Revolution: Articles of Confederation are ratified » The Articles are finally ratified. They were signed by Congress and sent to the individual states for ratification on November 15, 1777, after 16 months of debate. Bickering over land claims between Virginia and Maryland delayed final ratification for almost four more years. Maryland finally approved the Articles on March 1, 1781, affirming the Articles as the outline of the official government of the United States. The nation was guided by the Articles of Confederation until the implementation of the current U.S. Constitution in 1789. The critical distinction between the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution —the primacy of the states under the Articles—is best understood by comparing the following lines. The Articles of Confederation begin: “To all to whom these Present shall come, we the undersigned Delegates of the States” By contrast, the Constitution begins: “We the People of the United Statesdo ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” The predominance of the states under the Articles of Confederation is made even more explicit by the claims of Article II: “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.” Less than five years after the ratification of the Articles of Confederation, enough leading Americans decided that the system was inadequate to the task of governance that they peacefully overthrew their second government in just over 20 years.
    [Show full text]