DOCSLIB.ORG

Jerusalem,1969-1974

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jerusalem,1969-1974 THE NIXON ADMINISTRATION BETWEEN CAIRO AND JERUSALEM, 1969-1974: CONCEPTS, STRATEGIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION CONTENTS Contents ........................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................... v Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................. vii A note on terminology ..................................................................................................................... ix Abstract ............................................................................................................................................ x Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1. 1969: The Rise and Fall of the ‘Rogers Plan’ ................................................................ 12 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 12 Entering the Arena: Nixon and the Middle East, January 1969 ................................................. 14 Early Invitations: Prelude to the Two-Power Talks .................................................................... 18 The First Draft ‘Rogers Plan’, February 1969 .............................................................................. 23 Nasser’s War of Attrition and Golda Meir’s Israel, March 1969 ................................................ 26 The ‘Striptease’: Revealing the ‘Rogers Plan’ to the Russians, March-May 1969 ..................... 31 The Phantom Menace, Summer 1969 ........................................................................................ 36 When Richard Met Golda, Autumn 1969 ................................................................................... 41 The Joint Working Paper, October 1969 .................................................................................... 45 A Lead Balloon: The ‘Rogers Plan’ Unveiled, December 1969 ................................................... 50 Conclusion: The Legend of the ‘Rogers Plan’ ............................................................................. 58 Chapter 2. Paradigm Shift or Coming Out? The Nixon administration, the War of Attrition, and the Jordan Crisis, January – September 1970 ......................................................................... 61 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 61 Deep penetration Bombing and Kosygin’s Warning, January-February 1970 ........................... 64 Operation Blossom ..................................................................................................................... 64 The Kosygin Letter ...................................................................................................................... 67 From Complacency to Apprehension: Soviet Intervention and Israeli Arms Requests in Abeyance, March – May 1970 .................................................................................................... 71 Stop Shooting, Start Talking ....................................................................................................... 80 The Jordan Crisis ......................................................................................................................... 88 The Hostage Crisis ...................................................................................................................... 96 Civil War ................................................................................................................................... 100 Syrian Intervention ................................................................................................................... 103 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 107 Chapter 3. Chasing Phantoms? The Failed Interim Agreement, 1971 ......................................... 111 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 111 A Post Nasser Middle East, Autumn 1970 ................................................................................ 114 The Jarring Interlude, January – February 1971 ....................................................................... 121 Reaching Out to the White House: Sadat’s Peace Initiative .................................................... 126 Rogers’ Middle East Tour and the Egyptian-Soviet Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation, May – June 1971 ....................................................................................................................... 131 Chasing Phantoms: The Failure of Interim Diplomacy, July – August 1971 ............................. 136 Meir Prevails? Winter 1971 – 1972 .......................................................................................... 146 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 154 Chapter 4. Misconceived Diplomacy February 1972 – October 1973: Bound to be Stillborn? ... 157 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 157 A Year of Decisions: 1972 ......................................................................................................... 159 The National Security Advisors: Ismail meets Kissinger ........................................................... 168 A Familiar Visitor ...................................................................................................................... 175 The Wolf at the Door: Summer 1973 ....................................................................................... 181 Superpower Crisis By Design? Sadat’s War Plans..................................................................... 191 Conclusion: Bound to be Stillborn? .......................................................................................... 199 Chapter 5. Taking Sadat Seriously: The October War ............................................................. 203 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 203 The View From Washington: American Considerations at the Outbreak of War .................... 206 Aligning with Cairo, 6 – 8 October ............................................................................................ 209 The Ceasefire/Resupply Dilemma, 9 – 13 October .................................................................. 213 The Failed Ceasefire and Nixon’s Resupply Decision ............................................................... 219 Interlude: The Oil Weapon ....................................................................................................... 228 De-Linkage – Kissinger’s Ceasefire, 19 – 22 October ............................................................... 229 The Endgame: Finalising the Ceasefire ..................................................................................... 234 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 242 Chapter 6. US - Egypt Common Strategy? Kilometre 101, The Geneva Peace Conference, and the First Disengagement Agreement ....... 248 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 248 Restoring Relations: Kilometre 101 and the Six Point Agreement ........................................... 250 Who’s Agreement and Whither Palestine? .............................................................................. 254 Together at Last: When Anwar Met Henry .............................................................................. 259 A Separate Peace Process: Preparing for Geneva, November – December 1973.................... 260 Assembling the Cast: Kissinger’s Second Middle East Tour ..................................................... 266 Egypt-Israel disengagement, January 1974 .............................................................................. 278 The Geneva Negotiations ......................................................................................................... 278 The Aswan-Jerusalem Shuttle .................................................................................................. 283 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 288 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 291 Bibliography .......................................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined. Primary sources consulted ....................................................................................................... 308 Archives ...................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Case #2 United States of America (Respondent)
    Model International Court of Justice (MICJ) Case #2 United States of America (Respondent) Relocation of the United States Embassy to Jerusalem (Palestine v. United States of America) Arkansas Model United Nations (AMUN) November 20-21, 2020 Teeter 1 Historical Context For years, there has been a consistent struggle between the State of Israel and the State of Palestine led by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). In 2018, United States Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that the U.S. embassy located in Tel Aviv would be moving to the city of Jerusalem.1 Palestine, angered by the embassy moving, filed a case with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 2018.2 The history of this case, U.S. relations with Israel and Palestine, current events, and why the ICJ should side with the United States will be covered in this research paper. Israel and Palestine have an interesting relationship between war and competition. In 1948, Israel captured the west side of Jerusalem, and the Palestinians captured the east side during the Arab-Israeli War. Israel declared its independence on May 14, 1948. In 1949, the Lausanne Conference took place, and the UN came to the decision for “corpus separatum” which split Jerusalem into a Jewish zone and an Arab zone.3 At this time, the State of Israel decided that Jerusalem was its “eternal capital.”4 “Corpus separatum,” is a Latin term meaning “a city or region which is given a special legal and political status different from its environment, but which falls short of being sovereign, or an independent city-state.”5 1 Office of the President, 82 Recognizing Jerusalem as the Capital of the State of Israel and Relocating the United States Embassy to Israel to Jerusalem § (2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: What Went Wrong on October 6?: the Partial Report of the Israeli Commission of Inquiry Into the October War Source: Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol
    Israel: What Went Wrong on October 6?: The Partial Report of the Israeli Commission of Inquiry into the October War Source: Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. 3, No. 4 (Summer, 1974), pp. 189-207 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the Institute for Palestine Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2535473 . Accessed: 09/03/2015 16:05 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press and Institute for Palestine Studies are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Palestine Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 66.134.128.11 on Mon, 9 Mar 2015 16:05:41 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions SPECIAL DOCUMENT ISRAEL: WHAT WENT WRONG ON OCTOBER 6 ? THE PARTIAL REPORT OF THE ISRAELI COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO THE OCTOBER WAR [This was officiallyissued in Israel on April 2, 1974 as a reporton the mostpressing issuesraised duringthe generalinvestigation by the AgranatCommission of the prepared- ness of Israel for the October War. It comprisesa preface on the terms of reference and proceduresof the Committee(below); an account of the evaluationsmade by the Israeli IntelligenceServices up to October 6 (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Song, State, Sawa Music and Political Radio Between the US and Syria
    Song, State, Sawa Music and Political Radio between the US and Syria Beau Bothwell Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2013 © 2013 Beau Bothwell All rights reserved ABSTRACT Song, State, Sawa: Music and Political Radio between the US and Syria Beau Bothwell This dissertation is a study of popular music and state-controlled radio broadcasting in the Arabic-speaking world, focusing on Syria and the Syrian radioscape, and a set of American stations named Radio Sawa. I examine American and Syrian politically directed broadcasts as multi-faceted objects around which broadcasters and listeners often differ not only in goals, operating assumptions, and political beliefs, but also in how they fundamentally conceptualize the practice of listening to the radio. Beginning with the history of international broadcasting in the Middle East, I analyze the institutional theories under which music is employed as a tool of American and Syrian policy, the imagined youths to whom the musical messages are addressed, and the actual sonic content tasked with political persuasion. At the reception side of the broadcaster-listener interaction, this dissertation addresses the auditory practices, histories of radio, and theories of music through which listeners in the sonic environment of Damascus, Syria create locally relevant meaning out of music and radio. Drawing on theories of listening and communication developed in historical musicology and ethnomusicology, science and technology studies, and recent transnational ethnographic and media studies, as well as on theories of listening developed in the Arabic public discourse about popular music, my dissertation outlines the intersection of the hypothetical listeners defined by the US and Syrian governments in their efforts to use music for political ends, and the actual people who turn on the radio to hear the music.
    [Show full text]
  • Trend Analysis the Israeli Unit 8200 an OSINT-Based Study CSS
    CSS CYBER DEFENSE PROJECT Trend Analysis The Israeli Unit 8200 An OSINT-based study Zürich, December 2019 Risk and Resilience Team Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich Trend analysis: The Israeli Unit 8200 – An OSINT-based study Author: Sean Cordey © 2019 Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich Contact: Center for Security Studies Haldeneggsteig 4 ETH Zurich CH-8092 Zurich Switzerland Tel.: +41-44-632 40 25 [email protected] www.css.ethz.ch Analysis prepared by: Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich ETH-CSS project management: Tim Prior, Head of the Risk and Resilience Research Group, Myriam Dunn Cavelty, Deputy Head for Research and Teaching; Andreas Wenger, Director of the CSS Disclaimer: The opinions presented in this study exclusively reflect the authors’ views. Please cite as: Cordey, S. (2019). Trend Analysis: The Israeli Unit 8200 – An OSINT-based study. Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich. 1 Trend analysis: The Israeli Unit 8200 – An OSINT-based study . Table of Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Historical Background 5 2.1 Pre-independence intelligence units 5 2.2 Post-independence unit: former capabilities, missions, mandate and techniques 5 2.3 The Yom Kippur War and its consequences 6 3 Operational Background 8 3.1 Unit mandate, activities and capabilities 8 3.2 Attributed and alleged operations 8 3.3 International efforts and cooperation 9 4 Organizational and Cultural Background 10 4.1 Organizational structure 10 Structure and sub-units 10 Infrastructure 11 4.2 Selection and training process 12 Attractiveness and motivation 12 Screening process 12 Selection process 13 Training process 13 Service, reserve and alumni 14 4.3 Internal culture 14 5 Discussion and Analysis 16 5.1 Strengths 16 5.2 Weaknesses 17 6 Conclusion and Recommendations 18 7 Glossary 20 8 Abbreviations 20 9 Bibliography 21 2 Trend analysis: The Israeli Unit 8200 – An OSINT-based study selection tests comprise a psychometric test, rigorous Executive Summary interviews, and an education/skills test.
    [Show full text]
  • Envelope No. 3 • Gunnar Jarring (Special Representative of the Secretary-General to the Middle East) Reports (With One Item from 1972) - Jarring's Reports
    UN Secretariat Item Scan - Barcode - Record Title Page 10 Date 22/05/2006 Time 4:37:27 PM S-0865-0001 -10-00001 Expanded Number S-0865-0001 -10-00001 Title items-in-Peace-keeping operations - Middle East - envelope No. 3 • Gunnar Jarring (Special Representative of the Secretary-General to the Middle East) reports (with one item from 1972) - Jarring's Reports Date Created 21/08/1970 Record Type Archival Item Container S-0865-0001: Peace-Keeping Operations Files of the Secretary-General: U Thant - Middle East Print Name of Person Submit Image Signature of Person Submit '*s f- New York, 21 August 1970 Sir, I should be grateful if you would forward the following message to your Minister for Foreign Affairs: "CM-'JIT HJ "I have the honour to refer to my conversation of 0 August 1970 with .Ambassador El-Farra, at which I requested him to ascertain the views of your Government concerning the site, timing and other arrangements.for the forthcoming discussions to be held under my auspices, and to my letter of 12 August 1970, in which I expressed certain views concerning the site of, and level of representation at, cuch meetings. "I have now had the opportunity to consider the views of the parties on this question, including the information concerning your position provided "by Ambassadors Lil-Forra and Sharafj and feel that I should now make a recommendation to the parties as to the place and timing of the meetings. 1 therefore propose that the place for the initial meetings should be New York and that the opening date should be Tuesday, 215 August 1970.
    [Show full text]
  • The Labor Party and the Peace Camp
    The Labor Party and the Peace Camp By Uzi Baram In contemporary Israeli public discourse, the preoccupation with ideology has died down markedly, to the point that even releasing a political platform as part of elections campaigns has become superfluous. Politicians from across the political spectrum are focused on distinguishing themselves from other contenders by labeling themselves and their rivals as right, left and center, while floating around in the air are slogans such as “political left,” social left,” “soft right,” “new right,” and “mainstream right.” Yet what do “left” and “right” mean in Israel, and to what extent do these slogans as well as the political division in today’s Israel correlate with the political traditions of the various parties? Is the Labor Party the obvious and natural heir of The Workers Party of the Land of Israel (Mapai)? Did the historical Mapai under the stewardship of Ben Gurion view itself as a left-wing party? Did Menachem Begin’s Herut Party see itself as a right-wing party? The Zionist Left and the Soviet Union As far-fetched as it may seem in the eyes of today’s onlooker, during the first years after the establishment of the state, the position vis-à-vis the Soviet Union was the litmus test of the left camp, which was then called “the workers’ camp.” This camp viewed the centrist liberal “General Zionists” party, which was identified with European liberal and middle-class beliefs in private property and capitalism, as its chief ideological rival (and with which the heads of major cities such as Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan were affiliated)­.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle East -1971 (See List of Items Appendix No. 7)
    UN Secretariat Item Scan - Barcode - Record Title Page 4 Date 22/05/2006 Time 4:43:51 PM S-0865-0003-04-00001 Expanded Number S-0865-0003-04-00001 Title items-in-Peace-keeping operations - Middle East -1971 (see list of items appendix No. 7) Date Created 01/01/1971 Record Type Archival Item Container s-0865-0003: Peace-Keeping Operations Files of the Secretary-General: U Thant - Middle East Print Name of Person Submit Image Signature of Person Submit x/, 7 Selected Confidential Reports on OA-6-1 - Middle East 1971 Cable for SG from Goda Meir - 1 January 1971 2 Notes on meeting - 4 January 1971 - Present: SG, Sec. of State Rogers, 0 Ambassador Charles Yost, Mr. Joseph Sisco, Mr. McClosky and Mr. Urquhart t 3) Middle East Discussions - 5 January 1971 - Present: Ambassador Tekoah Mr. Aphek, Ambassador Jarring, Mr. Berendsen 4 Letter from Gunnar Jarrint to Abba Eban - 6 January 1971 x i Letter to Gunnar Jarring from C.T. Crowe (UK) 6 January 1971 *6 Notes on meeting - 7 January 1971 - Present: SG, Sir Colin Crowe 7 Notes on meeting - 7 January 1971 - Present: SG, Mr. Yosef Tekoah 8 "Essentials of Peace"(Israel and the UAR) - 9 January 1971 9 "Essentials of Peace" (Israel and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordon - 9 January 1971 Statement by El Tayalt - 13 January 1971 Minutes of meeting - 13 January 1971 - Present: M. Masmoudi, El-Goulli, Mr. Fourati, Mr. Jarring, Mr. Berendsen^ Letter from William P. Rogers - 15 January 1971 Letter - Middle East - 15 January 1971 Implementation of Security Council Resolution 242 of 22 November 1967 For The Establishment of a Just and Lasting Peace in the Middle East - 18 January 1971 C H-^-^ ?-«-r-"~) Comparison of the papers of Israel and the United Arab Republic 18 January 1971 L " Notes on meeting - 19 January 1971 - Present: SG, Ambassador Yost, USSR - 1 January 1971 - Middle East Communication from the Government of Israel to the United Arab Republic through Ambassador Jarring - 27 January 1971 France - 27 January 1971 - Middle East Statement by Malik Y.A.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Israel Studies, 8:1, Spring 2003 INTERVIEW with ABBA EBAN, 11
    1 Israel Studies, 8:1, Spring 2003 INTERVIEW WITH ABBA EBAN, 11 MARCH 1976 Avi Shlaim INTRODUCTION Abba Eban was often referred to as the voice of Israel. He was one of Israel’s most brilliant, eloquent, and skillful representatives abroad in the struggle for independence and in the first 25 years of statehood. He was less effective in the rough and tumble of Israeli domestic politics because he lacked the common touch and, more importantly, because he lacked a power base of his own. Nevertheless, he played a major role in the formulation and conduct of Israel’s foreign policy during a crucial period in the country’s history. Born in South Africa, on 2 February 1915, Eban grew up in London and gained a degree in Oriental languages from Cambridge University. During the Second World War he served with British military intelligence in Cairo and Jerusalem and reached the rank of major. After the war he joined the political department of the Jewish Agency. In 1949 he became head of the Israeli delegation to the United Nations. The following year he was appointed ambassador to the United States and he continued to serve in both posts until 1959. On his return to Israel, Eban was elected to the Knesset on the Mapai list and kept his seat until 1988. He joined the government in 1960 as minister without portfolio and later became minister of education and culture. Three years later he was promoted to the post of deputy by Prime Minister Levi Eshkol. In 1966 Eban became foreign minister and he retained this post after Golda Meir succeeded Levi Eshkol in 1969.
    [Show full text]
  • Forgotten in the Diaspora: the Palestinian Refugees in Egypt
    Forgotten in the Diaspora: The Palestinian Refugees in Egypt, 1948-2011 Lubna Ahmady Abdel Aziz Yassin Middle East Studies Center (MEST) Spring, 2013 Thesis Advisor: Dr. Sherene Seikaly Thesis First Reader: Dr. Pascale Ghazaleh Thesis Second Reader: Dr. Hani Sayed 1 Table of Contents I. CHAPTER ONE: PART ONE: INTRODUCTION……………………………………………...…….4 A. PART TWO: THE RISE OF THE PALESTINIAN REFUGEE PROBLEM…………………………………………………………………………………..……………..13 B. AL-NAKBA BETWEEN MYTH AND REALITY…………………………………………………14 C. EGYPTIAN OFFICIAL RESPONSE TO THE PALESTINE CAUSE DURING THE MONARCHAL ERA………………………………………………………………………………………25 D. PALESTINE IN THE EGYPTIAN PRESS DURING THE INTERWAR PERIOD………………………………………………………………………………………………..…….38 E. THE PALESTINIAN REFUGEES IN EGYPT, 1948-1952………………………….……….41 II. CHAPTER TWO: THE NASSER ERA, 1954-1970 A. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND…………………………………………………………………….…45 B. THE EGYPTIAN-PALESTINIAN RELATIONS, 1954-1970……………..………………..49 C. PALESTINIANS AND THE NASEERIST PRESS………………………………………………..71 D. PALESTINIAN SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS………………………………………………..…..77 E. LEGAL STATUS OF PALESTINIAN REFUGEES IN EGYPT………………………….…...81 III. CHAPTER THREE: THE SADAT ERA, 1970-1981 A. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND……………………………………………………………………….95 B. EGYPTIAN-PALESTINIAN RELATIONS DURING THE SADAT ERA…………………102 C. THE PRESS DURING THE SADAT ERA…………………………………………….……………108 D. PALESTINE IN THE EGYPTIAN PRESS DURING THE SADAT ERA……………….…122 E. THE LEGAL STATUS OF PALESTINIAN REFUGEES DURING THE SADAT ERA……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…129 IV. CHAPTER FOUR:
    [Show full text]
  • President's Report-18.Indd 1 1/28/09 11:52:40 AM President's Report-18.Indd 2 1/28/09 11:52:43 AM Table of Contents
    PRESIDENT’S REPORT 2007-2008 President's Report-18.indd 1 1/28/09 11:52:40 AM President's Report-18.indd 2 1/28/09 11:52:43 AM TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Letters 6 Features 14 Public Lectures 20 Highlights 24 Sponsored Programs 28 Financials 30 President’s Club 38 Board of Trustees President's Report-18.indd 3 1/28/09 11:52:44 AM This year we witnessed the realization of what could be described as the single biggest achievement in AUC’s history: after 10 years of planning and construction, the university successfully relocated to its new campus in New Cairo. It is fitting that this monumental relocation occurred on the eve of the university’s 90th anniversary, reminding us that the new campus is not just a new beginning, it also represents the continuation of a rich legacy spanning nearly a century. While the completion of the campus and the complicated logistics of the move presented us with multiple challenges — not atypical of an undertaking of this magnitude — they also created a wealth of opportunities that will propel AUC to a new level of excellence. As we are confronted with new challenges, we have a rare opportunity to re-examine all areas of operation, rethinking and refining many of our systems and programs. Yet, the most exciting opportunities for the institution are still unfolding and will continue in the years to come. The building of the New Cairo Campus is about creating a world- class university from the inside out. The campus has given us the most modern facilities needed to create that university, but it is AUC’s dedicated faculty and quality students President’s Letter who have always been the guiding force behind its success.
    [Show full text]
  • Perception, Misperception and Surprise in the Yom Kippur War: a Look at the New Evidence
    Perception, Misperception and Surprise in the Yom Kippur War: A Look at the New Evidence by Abraham Ben-Zvi INTRODUCTION: THE LIMITATIONS OF STRATEGIC SURPRISE THEORY During the years following the Second World War, intensive research was undertaken on the subject of response to threat. Confronted with the baffling, yet recurrent inability of nations to respond adequately to warnings of an impending attack, many scholars concentrated on such events as the Pearl Harbor attack, the Barbarossa Operation, and the outbreak of the Korean War, and produced a voluminous body of literature. Alongside the plethora of works which sought explanations solely in terms of the specific conditions operating at the time of the event analyzed, a few other inquiries attempted to integrate the case under scrutiny into a broader theoretical framework in order to better elucidate the inherent patterns by which nations cope with situations of crisis and threat.1 On the whole, the literature dealing with the failure of national actors to stand up to the challenge of an imminent assault can be divided into two major categories, which differ widely from one another in terms of the explicit and implicit premises, the specific nature of the explanation advanced, and the level of abstraction. These may be termed the analytic-revisionist and the cognitive-perceptual categories.2 In most of their basic premises, analytical-revisionist studies comprise an extension of the logic of the rational theory of decision. Convinced that actions taken by national actors reflect
    [Show full text]
  • Ambassador Gunnar Jarring's Mission to the Middle East As Special Representative of the Secretary-General
    S-0865-0002-26-00001 Expanded Number S-0865-0002-26-00001 Title Items-in-Peace-keeping operations - Middle East - Ambassador Gunnar Jarring's Mission to the Middle East as Special Representative of the Secretary-General Date Created 2211111967 Record Type Archival Item Container S-0865-0002: Peace-Keeping Operations Files of the Secretary-General: U Thant - Middle East Print Name of Person Submit Image SgaueoSignature of PersonesnSbi Submit --------------------------- "<1' Ck" -Th . Cs .CtA.&u - - CC.- v4 I - 1ý S NI fýaT44 AliEN 4 if fleet PC A I £2 A [CC i'¾ C4 'SW A' - "CCC' S Stc -p -, -A C if ,,.C' :1. C* . 1' UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM MEMORANDUM INTERIEUR TO: U Tta~nt r,,nDATE: 22 November 1967 A: ~The Secretary-General)vvý1ýREEENE THROUGH:A S/C DE.- FR~OM: C . A. Stavropoulos DE: The Legal Counsel SUBJ ECT-- OBJET: Terms of Reference of the- Sertr Gnrls Representative for the Middle East 1. At your req~uest I am submitting herewith a preliminary analysis of the terms of reference of the Secretary-Generalts Representative for the Middle East. In this memorandum I am confining my comments to two important issues: (1) the functions of the Special Representative, and (2) the meaning of the term "States concerned". I have not in the present paper attempted. to analyze the "provisions and principles" in the resolu- tion which ý-provide the framework within which the Special Representative will operate. Functions of the Special Reoresentative 2. Security Council resolution 81/242?, adopted on 22 November 1967, in paragraph 3 "Reuet the Secretary-General to designate a Special Representative to proceed to the Middle East to establish and maintain contacts with the States concerned in order to promote agreement and.
    [Show full text]