THE NORWEGIAN PETROLEUM SECTOR Cover: the First Oil Field in the North Sea, the Ekofisk Field, Started ­Production in 1971

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE NORWEGIAN PETROLEUM SECTOR Cover: the First Oil Field in the North Sea, the Ekofisk Field, Started ­Production in 1971 2014 2014 THE NORWEGIAN PETROLEUM SECTOR Cover: The first oil field in the North Sea, the Ekofisk field, started production in 1971. The field has been developed and expanded through- out the years. Old facilities have been removed and new ones installed in order to enable production for another 30–40 years. This picture shows the field as it emerges today, after three new facilities were installed in the summer of 2013 (Photo: Kjetil Alsvik/ConocoPhillips) New native apps for Android and Windows Phone are now available • All the fields • All the wells • All the production • All the operators • All the licenses • News, maps and more www.oilfacts.no 2014 THE NORWEGIAN PETROLEUM SECTOR What do you think about Facts 2014? Please send your comments to [email protected]. PB • FACTS 2014 Editor: Yngvild Tormodsgard, Ministry of Petroleum and Energy Design: Artdirector/Klas Jønsson Paper: Cover: Galerie art silk 250 g, Inside pages: Arctic silk 115 g Graphic production: 07 MEDIA Printing: 07 MEDIA Circulation: 13 500 New Norwegian / 12 000 English Publication number: Y-0103/15 E Cover: The Ekofisk Field in the North Sea (Photo : Kjetil Alsvik/ConocoPhillips) ISSN 1504-3398 4 • FACTS 2014 Tord Lien Minister of Petroleum and Energy Minister of Petroleum and Energy 2013 was yet another good year in the Norwegian petroleum sector. profitability of both projects and companies. The industry must take The activity level is high; the shelf is explored, resources discovered, action to control these costs. Succeeding with this will be crucial in fields developed and hydrocarbons produced and sold. Norwegian order to live up to the results from 2013. oil and gas is finding its way to customers all over the world. Norwegian petroleum activities have been the dominant domestic The objective of our petroleum policy is to generate the greatest industry for decades and have contributed to huge value creation, possible values from the resources on the Norwegian shelf in the a substantial number of jobs and wide-ranging effects in local best interest of the Norwegian society. This will require the best communities. efforts of everyone involved. Within a clear regulatory framework, we will work together in a smarter, more efficient and well organ- In other words, we have plenty of reasons to be proud. An effective, ised manner. We must develop knowledge, innovation and new well-founded regulatory framework stimulates the companies on technology. Then, and only then, will we be equipped for the future. the shelf to make decisions that maximize the value for the Norwe- gian society. Our service and supply industry is competitive, highly knowledgeable and in the forefront in many areas. We have an envi- ronmentally sound petroleum production, and our reputation as a stable, secure supplier of oil and gas to the markets is strong. Nevertheless, current realities do not allow us to ease our efforts. In order to generate the greatest possible values from our oil and gas resources, we must continue to improve. We must address future challenges in a serious manner. We will do so with a set of clear ground rules and continuous access to new, promising acreage. A predictable regulatory framework, including taxes and fees, contribute to sound resource management and facilitate both improved recovery from existing fields and development of smaller discoveries. The cost level on the Norwegian shelf has increased in recent years. In spite of new acreage and exciting discoveries, sectors of the Norwegian continental shelf are maturing. This puts pressure on the 4 • FACTS 2014 FACTS 2014 • 5 6 • FACTS 2014 CONTENT Minister’s Introduction 5 Emissions and discharges from the petroleum activities 47 Greenhouse gas emissions 48 1. Norway’s largest industry 9 Other emissions to air 49 Norwegian petroleum history 10 Operational discharges to sea 50 Current petroleum activities 12 Acute discharges 51 Significance to the Norwegian economy 12 The companies on the shelf 13 5. The service and supply industry 53 Production 13 Development and employment 54 Costs 14 Revenues 54 Deliveries throughout the value chain 55 2. The Norwegian continental shelf 15 International success 56 Areas on the Norwegian shelf 16 The southern North Sea 17 6. The future petroleum industry 57 The central North Sea 18 R&D in the oil and gas industry 58 The northern North Sea 19 PETROMAKS 2 58 The Norwegian Sea 21 DEMO 2000 58 The Barents Sea 21 PETROSENTER - Petroleum research centres 59 Petroleum resources 22 Other research programmes 59 Reserves 23 An industry geared towards the future 59 Contingent resources 23 Undiscovered resources 23 Appendix 61 The North Sea 23 Appendix 1: Historical statistics 62 The Norwegian Sea 23 Appendix 2: The petroleum resources 65 The Barents Sea 24 Appendix 3: Pipelines and onshore facilities 74 Appendix 4: Conversion factors 77 3. Framework and organisation 27 Legal framework 28 State organisation 29 The State’s revenues from petroleum activities 30 4. The Norwegian Petroleum Industry – from well to market 33 Exploration activity 34 Exploration policy in mature and frontier areas 34 Development and operation 38 Efficient production of petroleum resources 38 Improved recovery in mature areas 39 Improved recovery 39 Efficient operations 40 New discoveries – efficient utilisation of infrastructure 40 Decommissioning after production ends 42 The energy market 42 Price development 43 Oil 43 Natural gas 44 Gas exports from the Norwegian shelf 45 Organisation of the gas transport system 47 Regulated access to the transport system 47 6 • FACTS 2014 FACTS 2014 • 7 8 • FACTS 2014 NorwaY’S largest INDUSTRY 1 The Troll A platform has its foundation 303 meters below sea level. The natural gas produced at Troll A is sent to Kollsnes in Hordaland County for processing (Photo: Harald Pettersen, Statoil) PB • FACTS 2014 FACTS 2014 • 9 The petroleum activities have been key to the emergence of Norway’s 1965 on the basis of the equidistance principle. The first licensing current welfare state. Few believed the industry would have such an round was announced on 13 April 1965. 22 production licences immense impact on the Norwegian economy when the first pro- were awarded, covering 78 blocks. The first exploration well was duction licences were awarded in the mid-1960s. Fifty years later, the drilled in the summer of 1966, but turned out to be dry. activity level on the Norwegian shelf remains high, and the industry is The Norwegian oil era started with the discovery of Ekofisk in currently the largest and most important sector of our economy, 1969. Production from the field started on 15 June 1971, and several measured in value creation, State revenues and exports. This chapter large discoveries were made in the following years. In the 1970s, will provide an account of the incredible Norwegian petroleum exploration activities were concentrated in the North Sea. The area pioneers and what is currently happening on the Norwegian shelf. north of the 62nd parallel was opened for petroleum activity in 1979 and exploration was gradually initiated. Only a limited number of blocks were announced for each licensing round, and the most pro- Norwegian petroleum history mising areas were explored first. This led to world-class discoveries, and production from the Norwegian continental shelf has been About 50 years have passed since petroleum activities commen- dominated by these large fields. They were given names such as ced on the Norwegian shelf, and many of the early fields are still Ekofisk, Statfjord, Oseberg, Gullfaks and Troll. These fields have been, producing. The adventure started in the North Sea and has gradu- and are still, very important for the development of petroleum activi- ally moved north as the knowledge has increased. ties in Norway. Development of these large fields has also led to the establishment of infrastructure, enabling tie-in of a number of other At the end of the 1950s, few people imagined that the Norwegian fields. Production from several of the major fields is now in decline, continental shelf concealed a wealth of oil and gas. However, the and the trend is now development of and production from new, gas discovery in Groningen in the Netherlands in 1959 led to new- smaller fields. Current Norwegian petroleum production is therefore found optimism regarding the North Sea’s petroleum potential. divided among a larger number of fields than before. In October 1962, Philips Petroleum sent a letter to the Norwegian In the early days, the authorities chose a model where the petro- authorities requesting permission to explore for oil in the North Sea. leum activities were primarily carried out by foreign companies. They The company wanted a licence for the parts of the North Sea situa- dominated exploration activities and developed the first oil and gas ted on the Norwegian continental shelf. The offer was USD 160 000 fields. Norwegian participation gradually grew over time with the per month, and was regarded as an attempt to acquire exclusive addition of Norsk Hydro, Saga Petroleum. Statoil was established in rights. The Norwegian authorities refused to sign over the entire 1972 with the State as sole owner. A principle was also established to shelf to a single company. If the areas were to be opened for explora- give the State a 50 per cent ownership interest in each production tion, more than one company would be needed. licence. In 1993, this principle was changed so that an assessment is In May 1963, the Government proclaimed sovereignty over the made in each individual case as to whether there will be State partici- Norwegian continental shelf. A new act established that the State pation, and whether the ownership interest will be higher or lower. was the landowner, and that only the King (Government) could In 1999, Saga was acquired by Norsk Hydro, and Statoil was partially grant licences for exploration and production.
Recommended publications
  • Weekly Edition 11 of 2018
    Notices 1188--1293/18 ADMIRALTY NOTICES TO MARINERS Weekly Edition 11 15 March 2018 (Published on the ADMIRALTY website 05 March 2018) CONTENTS I Explanatory Notes. Publications List II ADMIRALTY Notices to Mariners. Updates to Standard Nautical Charts III Reprints of NAVAREA I Navigational Warnings IV Updates to ADMIRALTY Sailing Directions V Updates to ADMIRALTY List of Lights and Fog Signals VI Updates to ADMIRALTY List of Radio Signals VII Updates to Miscellaneous ADMIRALTY Nautical Publications VIII Updates to ADMIRALTY Digital Services For information on how to update your ADMIRALTY products using ADMIRALTY Notices to Mariners, please refer to NP294 How to Keep Your ADMIRALTY Products Up--to--Date. Mariners are requested to inform the UKHO immediately of the discovery of new or suspected dangers to navigation, observed changes to navigational aids and of shortcomings in both paper and digital ADMIRALTY Charts or Publications. The H--Note App helps you to send H--Notes to the UKHO, using your device’s camera, GPS and email. It is available for free download on Google Play and on the App Store. The Hydrographic Note Form (H102) should be used to forward this information and to report any ENC display issues. H102A should be used for reporting changes to Port Information. H102B should be used for reporting GPS/Chart Datum observations. Copies of these forms can be found at the back of this bulletin and on the UKHO website. The following communication facilities are available: NMs on ADMIRALTY website: Web: admiralty.co.uk/msi Searchable Notices to Mariners: Web: www.ukho.gov.uk/nmwebsearch Urgent navigational information: e--mail: [email protected] Phone: +44(0)1823 353448 Fax: +44(0)1823 322352 H102 forms e--mail: [email protected] (see back pages of this Weekly Edition) Post: UKHO, Admiralty Way, Taunton, Somerset, TA1 2DN, UK All other enquiries/information e--mail: [email protected] Phone: +44(0)1823 484444 (24/7) Crown Copyright 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    Notes 1 Introduction 1. Donald Macintyre, Narvik (London: Evans, 1959), p. 15. 2. See Olav Riste, The Neutral Ally: Norway’s Relations with Belligerent Powers in the First World War (London: Allen and Unwin, 1965). 3. Reflections of the C-in-C Navy on the Outbreak of War, 3 September 1939, The Fuehrer Conferences on Naval Affairs, 1939–45 (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1990), pp. 37–38. 4. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 10 October 1939, in ibid. p. 47. 5. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 8 December 1939, Minutes of a Conference with Herr Hauglin and Herr Quisling on 11 December 1939 and Report of the C-in-C Navy, 12 December 1939 in ibid. pp. 63–67. 6. MGFA, Nichols Bohemia, n 172/14, H. W. Schmidt to Admiral Bohemia, 31 January 1955 cited by Francois Kersaudy, Norway, 1940 (London: Arrow, 1990), p. 42. 7. See Andrew Lambert, ‘Seapower 1939–40: Churchill and the Strategic Origins of the Battle of the Atlantic, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 17, no. 1 (1994), pp. 86–108. 8. For the importance of Swedish iron ore see Thomas Munch-Petersen, The Strategy of Phoney War (Stockholm: Militärhistoriska Förlaget, 1981). 9. Churchill, The Second World War, I, p. 463. 10. See Richard Wiggan, Hunt the Altmark (London: Hale, 1982). 11. TMI, Tome XV, Déposition de l’amiral Raeder, 17 May 1946 cited by Kersaudy, p. 44. 12. Kersaudy, p. 81. 13. Johannes Andenæs, Olav Riste and Magne Skodvin, Norway and the Second World War (Oslo: Aschehoug, 1966), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Services Guide and Independent Expert's Report
    Roc Oil Company Limited (ROC) 16 June 2014 ASX RELEASE INDEPENDENT EXPERT'S REPORT ROC recently commissioned Grant Samuel & Associates Pty Ltd to prepare an Independent Expert's Report on the proposed merger with Horizon Oil. The Independent Expert has concluded that the merger is in the best interests of ROC shareholders. ROC shareholders will have recently received a Notice of an Extraordinary General Meeting to be held on 11 July 2014 (EGM). The meeting has been requested by fund manager Allan Gray to consider a resolution to change ROC’s Constitution and to frustrate the Merger. The Board's view is that this is clearly not in the best interests of ROC shareholders. ROC's directors unanimously recommend that ROC shareholders VOTE AGAINST the resolution proposed at the EGM enabling the merger with Horizon Oil to proceed. A copy of the Independent Expert's Report and a summary prepared by Grant Samuel are attached to this announcement. Copies of these documents are also available on ROC's website at http://www.rocoil.com.au/Investor--Media-Centre/Announcements/. Alan Linn For further information please contact: Executive Director Renee Jacob & Chief Executive Officer Group Manager Investor Relations & Corporate Affairs Tel: +61-2-8023-2096 Email: [email protected] For personal use only GRANT SAMUEL & ASSOCIATES LEVEL 6 1 COLLINS STREET MELBOURNE VIC 3000 T: +61 3 9949 8800 / F: +61 3 9949 8838 www.grantsamuel.com.au 15 June 2014 The Directors Roc Oil Company Limited Level 18, 321 Kent Street SYDNEY NSW 2000 Dear Directors Proposed Merger with Horizon Oil Limited 1 Introduction On 29 April 2014, Roc Oil Company Limited (“ROC”) and Horizon Oil Limited (“Horizon”) announced that they had reached agreement for a “merger of equals” (“Merger”), to be effected via a scheme of arrangement between Horizon and its shareholders (“Scheme”).
    [Show full text]
  • Rowland Kenney and British Propaganda in Norway: 1916-1942
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository ROWLAND KENNEY AND BRITISH PROPAGANDA IN NORWAY: 1916-1942 Paul Magnus Hjertvik Buvarp A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2016 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/8647 This item is protected by original copyright Rowland Kenney and British Propaganda in Norway: 1916-1942 Paul Magnus Hjertvik Buvarp This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 18 September 2015 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, ……, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately ….. words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in [month, year] and as a candidate for the degree of …..…. in [month, year]; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between [year] and [year]. (If you received assistance in writing from anyone other than your supervisor/s): I, …..., received assistance in the writing of this thesis in respect of [language, grammar, spelling or syntax], which was provided by …… Date …… signature of candidate ……… 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Petroleum Directorate
    Norwegian Petroleum Directorate ANNUAL REPORT 1998 NPD Annual Report 1998 1 The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate shall provide for a highest possible creation of value and contribute to a safe conduct of the petroleum activities and a sound exploitation of the resources, while having due consideration for the environment. The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate was established in 1972 and has approximately 350 positions. The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate answers to the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy with regard to resource management and administrative matters, and to the Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development for matters relating to safety and working environment. Within the area of CO2 tax, the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate exercises authority on behalf of the Ministry of Finance. The most important tasks of the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate are to have the best possible knowledge concerning discovered and undiscovered petroleum resources on the Norwegian continental shelf, to carry out supervision to ensure that the licensees manage the resources in an efficient and prudent manner and to supervise regulatory compliance so that a responsible safety level and working environment are established, maintained and further developed. The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate also has an important role with regard to influencing the industry to develop solutions which serve the best interests of society as a whole. The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate provides advice to supervising ministries and has been delegated the authority to issue regulations and make decisions regarding consents, orders, deviations and approvals pursuant to the regulations. Through its activities, the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate shall contribute towards making Norway a leader in environmental issues. The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate shall also provide neutral information concerning the petroleum activities to the industry, the media and to society at large.
    [Show full text]
  • Total E&P Norge AS
    ANNUAL REPORT TOTAL E&P NORGE AS E&P NORGE TOTAL TOTAL E&P NORGE AS ANNUAL REPORT 2014 CONTENTS IFC KEY FIGURES 02 ABOUT TOTAL E&P NORGE 05 BETTER TOGETHER IN CHALLENGING TIMES 07 BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ REPORT 15 INCOME STATEMENT 16 BALANCE SHEET 18 CASH FLOW STATEMENT 19 ACCOUNTING POLICIES 20 NOTES 30 AUDITIOR’S REPORT 31 ORGANISATION CHART IBC OUR INTERESTS ON THE NCS TOTAL E&P IS INVOLVED IN EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION O F OIL AND GAS ON THE NORWEGIAN CONTINENTAL SHELF, AND PRODUCED ON AVERAGE 242 000 BARRELS OF OIL EQUIVALENTS EVERY DAY IN 2014. BETTER TOGETHER IN CHALLENGING TIMES Total E&P Norge holds a strong position in Norway. The Company has been present since 1965 and will mark its 50th anniversary in 2015. TOTAL E&P NORGE AS ANNUAL REPORT TOTAL REVENUES MILLION NOK 42 624 OPERATING PROFIT MILLION NOK 22 323 PRODUCTION (NET AVERAGE DAILY PRODUCTION) THOUSAND BOE 242 RESERVES OF OIL AND GAS (PROVED DEVELOPED AND UNDEVELOPED RESERVES AT 31.12) MILLION BOE 958 EMPLOYEES (AVERAGE NUMBER DURING 2013) 424 KEY FIGURES MILLION NOK 2014 2013 2012 INCOME STATEMENT Total revenues 42 624 45 007 51 109 Operating profit 22 323 24 017 33 196 Financial income/(expenses) – net (364) (350) (358) Net income before taxes 21 959 23 667 32 838 Taxes on income 14 529 16 889 23 417 Net income 7 431 6 778 9 421 Cash flow from operations 17 038 15 894 17 093 BALANCE SHEET Intangible assets 2 326 2 548 2 813 Investments, property, plant and equipment 76 002 67 105 57 126 Current assets 7 814 10 506 10 027 Total equity 15 032 13 782 6 848 Long-term provisions
    [Show full text]
  • TYNDP 2017 FID Status (Final Investment Decision) White Sea PCI Status (Project of Common Interest) Submission
    SHTOKMAN SNØHVIT Pechora Sea ASKELADD MELKØYA KEYS ALBATROSS Hammerfest Salekhard Cross-border points / intra-country or intra balancing zone points Transport by pipeline LNG Import Terminals Storage facilities Compressor stations Barents KILDIN N Acquifer Sea 1ACross-border interconnection point Cross-border interconnection point Pipeline diameters : LNG Terminals’ entry point within Europe within Europe Diameter < 600 mm intro transmission system Salt cavity - cavern or export point to non-EU country or export point to non-EU country Operational Under construction or Planned Diameter 600 - 900 mm Depleted (Gas) eld on shore / oshore MURMAN Diameter > 900mm Other type Unknown Cross-border interconnection point Cross-border third country (import) with third country (import) Under construction or Planned Pomorskiy Project categories : Project categories : Project categories : Project categories : Strait Intra-country or Murmansk Third country cross-border FID projects FID projects FID projects intra balancing zone points interconnection point FID projects Non-FID, advanced projects Non-FID, advanced projects Non-FID, advanced projects REYKJAVIK Non-FID, advanced projects Non-FID, non-advanced projects Non-FID, non-advanced projects Non-FID, non-advanced projects Gas Reserve areas Countries Non-FID, non-advanced projects ENTSOG Member Countries ICELAND Project is part of 2nd PCI list : Project is part of 2nd PCI list : Project is part of 2nd PCI list : Project is part of 2nd PCI list : Drilling platform ENTSOG Associated Partner P ENTSOG
    [Show full text]
  • 10Fields in Production
    eng_fakta_2005_kap10 12-04-05 15:26 Side 66 10 Fields in production eng_fakta_2005_kap10 12-04-05 15:26 Side 67 Keys to tables in chapters 10–12 Interests in fields do not necessarily correspond with interests in the individual production licences (unitised fields or ones for which the sliding scale has been exercised have a different composition of interests than the production licence). Because interests are shown up to two decimal places, licensee holdings in a field may add up to less than 100 percent. Interests are shown at 1 January 2005. “Recoverable reserves originally present” refers to reserves in resource categories 0, 1, 2 and 3 in the NPD’s classification system (see the definitions below). “Recoverable reserves remaining” refers to reserves in resource categories 1, 2 and 3 in the NPD’s classification system (see the definitions below). Resource category 0: Petroleum sold and delivered Resource category 1: Reserves in production Resource category 2: Reserves with an approved plan for development and operation Resource category 3: Reserves which the licensees have decided to develop FACTS 2005 67 eng_fakta_2005_kap10 12-04-05 15:26 Side 68 Southern North Sea The southern part of the North Sea sector became important for the country at an early stage, with Ekofisk as the first Norwegian offshore field to come on stream, more than 30 years ago. Ekofisk serves as a hub for petroleum operations in this area, with surrounding developments utilising the infrastructure which ties it to continental Europe and Britain. Norwegian oil and gas is exported from Ekofisk to Teesside in the UK and Emden in Germany respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Rowland Kenney and British Propaganda in Norway: 1916-1942
    ROWLAND KENNEY AND BRITISH PROPAGANDA IN NORWAY: 1916-1942 Paul Magnus Hjertvik Buvarp A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2016 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/8647 This item is protected by original copyright Rowland Kenney and British Propaganda in Norway: 1916-1942 Paul Magnus Hjertvik Buvarp This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 18 September 2015 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, ……, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately ….. words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in [month, year] and as a candidate for the degree of …..…. in [month, year]; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between [year] and [year]. (If you received assistance in writing from anyone other than your supervisor/s): I, …..., received assistance in the writing of this thesis in respect of [language, grammar, spelling or syntax], which was provided by …… Date …… signature of candidate ……… 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of ……… in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Edition 07 of 2018
    Notices 762--875/18 ADMIRALTY NOTICES TO MARINERS Weekly Edition 07 15 February 2018 (Published on the ADMIRALTY website 05 February 2018) CONTENTS I Explanatory Notes. Publications List II ADMIRALTY Notices to Mariners. Updates to Standard Nautical Charts III Reprints of NAVAREA I Navigational Warnings IV Updates to ADMIRALTY Sailing Directions V Updates to ADMIRALTY List of Lights and Fog Signals VI Updates to ADMIRALTY List of Radio Signals VII Updates to Miscellaneous ADMIRALTY Nautical Publications VIII Updates to ADMIRALTY Digital Services For information on how to update your ADMIRALTY products using ADMIRALTY Notices to Mariners, please refer to NP294 How to Keep Your ADMIRALTY Products Up--to--Date. Mariners are requested to inform the UKHO immediately of the discovery of new or suspected dangers to navigation, observed changes to navigational aids and of shortcomings in both paper and digital ADMIRALTY Charts or Publications. The H--Note App helps you to send H--Notes to the UKHO, using your device’s camera, GPS and email. It is available for free download on Google Play and on the App Store. The Hydrographic Note Form (H102) should be used to forward this information and to report any ENC display issues. H102A should be used for reporting changes to Port Information. H102B should be used for reporting GPS/Chart Datum observations. Copies of these forms can be found at the back of this bulletin and on the UKHO website. The following communication facilities are available: NMs on ADMIRALTY website: Web: admiralty.co.uk/msi Searchable Notices to Mariners: Web: www.ukho.gov.uk/nmwebsearch Urgent navigational information: e--mail: [email protected] Phone: +44(0)1823 353448 Fax: +44(0)1823 322352 H102 forms e--mail: [email protected] (see back pages of this Weekly Edition) Post: UKHO, Admiralty Way, Taunton, Somerset, TA1 2DN, UK All other enquiries/information e--mail: [email protected] Phone: +44(0)1823 484444 (24/7) Crown Copyright 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Molde Og Romsda L Il~Rigstiden 1940
    N ils Parelius: Molde og Romsda l i l~rigstiden 1940 - 1945 Try kt med støtte fra Norges Hjemmefrontmuseum og Møre og Romsdal fylke. Nils Parelius Molde og Romsdal i krigstiden / 1940 - 1945 En. bibliografi Med noen. utdrag fra bøkene Utgitt av Romsdalsmuseet «Kongen Omslagetog Kronprinsen viser et ved utsnitt Molde av 1940> Axel Revolds maleri (Tilh�rer Oslo Handelsstands Forening) Klisj eene velvillig utlant av H. Aschehoug & Co. E. K. Hansens trykkeri Molde 1970 Mens de spilte gamle stykker i vår blodige april , /!ertes teppet for et ann et, vilt og ukjent skuespill, aldr i øvet, aldri prøvet , jagende fra sted til sted - det var Norges skjebnedrama . Nordah l Grieg. Innledning Bibliografien tar sikte på å registre re den litt erat ur som fore­ ligger om Molde og Romsdal i krigstiden 9. april 1940 til 8. mai 1945. Litteratur hvor Molde og Romsdal bare nevnes uten nær­ mere omtale, er ikke tatt med. Det samme prinsipp er fulgt når det gjelder lokale publik asjoner som innskr enker seg til å nevn e krigstiden. Bibliografien omfatter ikke avisartikler, unntatt i de tilfelle hvor de er inntatt i samleverker . I ett tilf elle har en imid­ ledtid funn et grun n t il å ta med en større serie avisartikler . Så­ vidt mulig er også billedstoff angitt. Molde og Rom sdal har fått en forhol dsvis bred plass i litte ­ rat uren om kri gsbegiven hetene i 1940. Det skyldes for det første den militære rolle distriktet kom til å spille. Alt 8. april kom Romsdalsk ysten i bren npunkt et.
    [Show full text]
  • Fields in Production
    12 Fields in production Southern North Sea sector Ekofisk area (Ekofisk, Eldfisk, Embla and Tor) . 71 Glitne . 74 Gungne . 75 Gyda (incl Gyda South) . 76 Hod . 77 Sigyn . 78 Sleipner West . 79 Sleipner East . 80 Tambar . 81 Ula . 82 Valhall ( incl Valhall flanks and Valhall water injection) . 83 Varg . 84 Northern North Sea sector Balder (incl Ringhorne) . 86 Brage . 87 Frigg . 88 Gullfaks (incl Gullfaks Vest) . 90 Gullfaks South (incl Rimfaks and Gullveig) . 92 Heimdal . 94 Huldra . 95 Jotun . 96 Murchison . 97 Oseberg (Oseberg, Oseberg West, Oseberg East, Oseberg South) . 98 Snorre (incl Snorre B) . 101 Statfjord . 103 Statfjord North . 105 Statfjord East . 106 Sygna . 107 Tordis (incl Tordis East and Borg) . 108 Troll phase I . 110 Troll phase II . 112 Tune . 114 Vale . 115 Veslefrikk . 116 Vigdis . 117 Visund . 118 Norwegian Sea Draugen . 120 Heidrun . 121 Njord . 122 Norne . 123 Åsgard . 124 Fields which have ceased production . 126 12 Explanation of the tables in chapters 12–14 Interests in fields do not necessarily correspond with interests in the individual production licences (unitised fields or ones for which the sliding scale has been exercised have a different composition of interests than the production licence). Because interests are shown up to two deci- mal places, licensee holdings in a field may add up to less than 100 per cent. Interests are shown at 1 January 2003. Recoverable reserves originally present refers to reserves in resource categories 0, 1, 2 and 3 in the NPD’s classification system (see the definitions below). Recoverable reserves remaining refers to reserves in resource categories 1, 2 and 3 in the NPD’s classification system (see the definitions below).
    [Show full text]