Importance of Wireless Connectivity in Offshore Digitalisation Industry Pain Point: Connectivity How Do We Address It?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Importance of Wireless Connectivity In Offshore Digitalisation Industry Pain Point: Connectivity How do we address it? Offshore Offshore International Infrastructure 4G LTE Carrier Magnus Trondheim Eider Thistle Snorre A Tern North Cormorant Gullfaks C Cormorant A Brent Gullfaks A Heather Ninian Kvitebjørn Stockholm Clair Ridge N Alwyn Kollsnes Oslo Veslefrikk Troll A The Martin Linge Oseberg Brage Glen Lyon Kraken Norway Bruce Tveiten Tampnet North Sea Beryl B Mariner Heimdal Kårstø Beryl A Alvheim Jotun A Green Mountain Gryphon Ringhorne Infrastructure Grane Stavanger Harding Ivar Aasen Egersund Stølen Brae E Gudrun Edv.Grieg Brae B Gina Lista Brae A Krog Claymore Piper B Sleipner Tartan Tiffany Balmoral Draupner Bulbjerg Scott Andrew Alba Armada YME Britannia Forties B Aberdeen Forties Unity Everest Forties C Scotland Nelson Culzean Montrose Lomond Ula Denmark Kittiwake Erskine Gannet Gyda ETAP Triton Elgin/Franklin King Lear Shearwater Judy Copenhagen Jade Ekofisk USA Clyde Esbjerg Edinburgh Fulmar Valhall Syd Arne The North Sea Cygnus Murdoch Hamburg LEGEND: Hornsea Leeds Tampnet LOS Germany Optical Fiber England Tampnet POP Lowestoft Netherlands Amsterdam USA Slough Belgium London France 4G/LTE Marine Coverage 4G/LTE Marine Coverage North Sea Baton 4G/LTE Coverage GoM Rouge Data Pascagoula . Existing (outlined in blue) Cable Landing Center Station . Planned (outlined in yellow) . Exclusive access to BP’s Deepwater Fiber (white line offshore) Freeport Cable Landing Station Houston Data Center ~250 000 km² Tampnet Core Carrier Network • London – Stockholm Ultra Low Latency • Denmark Connectivity • Major Norwegian DC On-Net • Cloud provider online • Optical restoration ready New Routes 2018 • Frankfurt Q3 • US – Houston and Dallas • Availability 2N+N Destination from Stavanger: • Route to London (12,8ms) • Route to Aberdeen (9,67ms) • Route to Amsterdam (13ms) • Route to Frankfurt (16,5ms) • Route to Oslo (6,8ms) • Route to Stockholm (15ms) Tampnet Carrier - Transatlantic Network London- Houston: Trondheim 90ms Stavanger Stockholm Oslo Amsterdam London Aberdeen -Houston: Halifax 101ms Chicago New York Dallas Houston Stavanger -Houston: 101ms 8 Tampnet Privat APN Gateways/CPE Oil Company WWW Internet APN Tablets Service Private 4G LTE Company WWW Internet Network APN Sim Card Service Container Internet of Things solutions for offshore platforms Predictive maintenance by monitoring Track and trace containers vibrations in central machinery Assisted maintenance (tablets, sensors, video, VR) Optimize and secure lift operations Monitoring condition of Automatic ordering of construction (e.g. spare parts jacket) Reduce CO2 emissions by optimizing energy Indoor climate and noise monitoring usage on the platform (smart lighting, smart for improved employee health and ventilation etc.) productivity Selected examples Internal 4G LTE Coverage Enabling Digitalization for Offshore fields Ex certified 4G/LTE Enabled Devices New narrowband technologies to support IoT Tampnet key enabler of Digitalisation offshore How do we address it? 1) Industry pain Point: Connectivity (available everywhere at all times) 2) How do we address it: (Fiber, LTE, International Connectivity) 3) Value Proposition: Better, cheaper and more reliable than anyone else. Painless and always available. 4) Differentiators: Experience, infrastructure, end-to-end responsibility, flexibility 5) What are we looking for: For the industry to really start leveraging the endless opportunities and alternative uses of LTE in offshore digitalisation. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

1 Introduction
Notes 1 Introduction 1. Donald Macintyre, Narvik (London: Evans, 1959), p. 15. 2. See Olav Riste, The Neutral Ally: Norway’s Relations with Belligerent Powers in the First World War (London: Allen and Unwin, 1965). 3. Reflections of the C-in-C Navy on the Outbreak of War, 3 September 1939, The Fuehrer Conferences on Naval Affairs, 1939–45 (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1990), pp. 37–38. 4. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 10 October 1939, in ibid. p. 47. 5. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 8 December 1939, Minutes of a Conference with Herr Hauglin and Herr Quisling on 11 December 1939 and Report of the C-in-C Navy, 12 December 1939 in ibid. pp. 63–67. 6. MGFA, Nichols Bohemia, n 172/14, H. W. Schmidt to Admiral Bohemia, 31 January 1955 cited by Francois Kersaudy, Norway, 1940 (London: Arrow, 1990), p. 42. 7. See Andrew Lambert, ‘Seapower 1939–40: Churchill and the Strategic Origins of the Battle of the Atlantic, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 17, no. 1 (1994), pp. 86–108. 8. For the importance of Swedish iron ore see Thomas Munch-Petersen, The Strategy of Phoney War (Stockholm: Militärhistoriska Förlaget, 1981). 9. Churchill, The Second World War, I, p. 463. 10. See Richard Wiggan, Hunt the Altmark (London: Hale, 1982). 11. TMI, Tome XV, Déposition de l’amiral Raeder, 17 May 1946 cited by Kersaudy, p. 44. 12. Kersaudy, p. 81. 13. Johannes Andenæs, Olav Riste and Magne Skodvin, Norway and the Second World War (Oslo: Aschehoug, 1966), p.
[Show full text]
Rowland Kenney and British Propaganda in Norway: 1916-1942
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository ROWLAND KENNEY AND BRITISH PROPAGANDA IN NORWAY: 1916-1942 Paul Magnus Hjertvik Buvarp A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2016 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/8647 This item is protected by original copyright Rowland Kenney and British Propaganda in Norway: 1916-1942 Paul Magnus Hjertvik Buvarp This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 18 September 2015 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, ……, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately ….. words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in [month, year] and as a candidate for the degree of …..…. in [month, year]; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between [year] and [year]. (If you received assistance in writing from anyone other than your supervisor/s): I, …..., received assistance in the writing of this thesis in respect of [language, grammar, spelling or syntax], which was provided by …… Date …… signature of candidate ……… 2.
[Show full text]
Total E&P Norge AS
ANNUAL REPORT TOTAL E&P NORGE AS E&P NORGE TOTAL TOTAL E&P NORGE AS ANNUAL REPORT 2014 CONTENTS IFC KEY FIGURES 02 ABOUT TOTAL E&P NORGE 05 BETTER TOGETHER IN CHALLENGING TIMES 07 BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ REPORT 15 INCOME STATEMENT 16 BALANCE SHEET 18 CASH FLOW STATEMENT 19 ACCOUNTING POLICIES 20 NOTES 30 AUDITIOR’S REPORT 31 ORGANISATION CHART IBC OUR INTERESTS ON THE NCS TOTAL E&P IS INVOLVED IN EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION O F OIL AND GAS ON THE NORWEGIAN CONTINENTAL SHELF, AND PRODUCED ON AVERAGE 242 000 BARRELS OF OIL EQUIVALENTS EVERY DAY IN 2014. BETTER TOGETHER IN CHALLENGING TIMES Total E&P Norge holds a strong position in Norway. The Company has been present since 1965 and will mark its 50th anniversary in 2015. TOTAL E&P NORGE AS ANNUAL REPORT TOTAL REVENUES MILLION NOK 42 624 OPERATING PROFIT MILLION NOK 22 323 PRODUCTION (NET AVERAGE DAILY PRODUCTION) THOUSAND BOE 242 RESERVES OF OIL AND GAS (PROVED DEVELOPED AND UNDEVELOPED RESERVES AT 31.12) MILLION BOE 958 EMPLOYEES (AVERAGE NUMBER DURING 2013) 424 KEY FIGURES MILLION NOK 2014 2013 2012 INCOME STATEMENT Total revenues 42 624 45 007 51 109 Operating profit 22 323 24 017 33 196 Financial income/(expenses) – net (364) (350) (358) Net income before taxes 21 959 23 667 32 838 Taxes on income 14 529 16 889 23 417 Net income 7 431 6 778 9 421 Cash flow from operations 17 038 15 894 17 093 BALANCE SHEET Intangible assets 2 326 2 548 2 813 Investments, property, plant and equipment 76 002 67 105 57 126 Current assets 7 814 10 506 10 027 Total equity 15 032 13 782 6 848 Long-term provisions
[Show full text]
Rowland Kenney and British Propaganda in Norway: 1916-1942
ROWLAND KENNEY AND BRITISH PROPAGANDA IN NORWAY: 1916-1942 Paul Magnus Hjertvik Buvarp A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2016 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/8647 This item is protected by original copyright Rowland Kenney and British Propaganda in Norway: 1916-1942 Paul Magnus Hjertvik Buvarp This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 18 September 2015 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, ……, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately ….. words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in [month, year] and as a candidate for the degree of …..…. in [month, year]; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between [year] and [year]. (If you received assistance in writing from anyone other than your supervisor/s): I, …..., received assistance in the writing of this thesis in respect of [language, grammar, spelling or syntax], which was provided by …… Date …… signature of candidate ……… 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of ……… in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
[Show full text]
Molde Og Romsda L Il~Rigstiden 1940
N ils Parelius: Molde og Romsda l i l~rigstiden 1940 - 1945 Try kt med støtte fra Norges Hjemmefrontmuseum og Møre og Romsdal fylke. Nils Parelius Molde og Romsdal i krigstiden / 1940 - 1945 En. bibliografi Med noen. utdrag fra bøkene Utgitt av Romsdalsmuseet «Kongen Omslagetog Kronprinsen viser et ved utsnitt Molde av 1940> Axel Revolds maleri (Tilh�rer Oslo Handelsstands Forening) Klisj eene velvillig utlant av H. Aschehoug & Co. E. K. Hansens trykkeri Molde 1970 Mens de spilte gamle stykker i vår blodige april , /!ertes teppet for et ann et, vilt og ukjent skuespill, aldr i øvet, aldri prøvet , jagende fra sted til sted - det var Norges skjebnedrama . Nordah l Grieg. Innledning Bibliografien tar sikte på å registre re den litt erat ur som fore ligger om Molde og Romsdal i krigstiden 9. april 1940 til 8. mai 1945. Litteratur hvor Molde og Romsdal bare nevnes uten nær mere omtale, er ikke tatt med. Det samme prinsipp er fulgt når det gjelder lokale publik asjoner som innskr enker seg til å nevn e krigstiden. Bibliografien omfatter ikke avisartikler, unntatt i de tilfelle hvor de er inntatt i samleverker . I ett tilf elle har en imid ledtid funn et grun n t il å ta med en større serie avisartikler . Så vidt mulig er også billedstoff angitt. Molde og Rom sdal har fått en forhol dsvis bred plass i litte rat uren om kri gsbegiven hetene i 1940. Det skyldes for det første den militære rolle distriktet kom til å spille. Alt 8. april kom Romsdalsk ysten i bren npunkt et.
[Show full text]
Ian Herrington November 2002
DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY, LEICESTER THE SPECIAL OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE IN NORWAY 1940-1945: POLICY AND OPERATIONS IN THE STRATEGIC AND POLITICAL CONTEXT A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SCHOOL OF HISTORICAL AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES BY IAN HERRINGTON June 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract.……………………………………………………………………..i Acknowledgements.………...……………………………………………….ii Abbreviations.……..………………………………………………………. iii Maps………..…………………………………………………………..viii-xii CHAPTERS Introduction……..… ………………………………………………….1 1. The Formation of SOE and its Scandinavian Section: A New Strategic Tool and a Nordic Opportunity …………………………………….. .26 2. SOE’s Policy in Norway 1940-1945: The Combination of Short and Long-Term Aims …………………………………….……………... 55 3. SOE and the Norwegian Government and its Military Authorities 1940-1945: Control through Collaboration………….………….……84 4. SOE and the Military Resistance in Norway 1940-1945: Direction, Separation and finally Partnership…………………………………..116 5. SOE and the other New Organisations Operating in Norway 1940- 1945: A Military Alliance..………………………………………….146 6. SOE and the Regular Armed Forces Operating in Norway 1940-1945: an Unexpected Partnership…………………………………….……185 7. SOE Operations in Norway 1940-1944: The Combination of Sabotage and the Organisation of a Clandestine Army ……………………….221 8. SOE and the Liberation of Norway 1944-1945: Operations in the Shadow of Overlord....……………………………………………..257 Conclusion…………………………………………………………..289 APPENDICES Appendix A: List
[Show full text]
Telavåg I Tid Og Rom Erindringen Om Et Krigsherjet Fiskerisamfunn
Telavåg i tid og rom Erindringen om et krigsherjet fiskerisamfunn Mastergradsoppgave i historie Eirik Gurandsrud Høgskolen i Bergen – Universitetet i Bergen Vår 2005 Innhold Forord s. 5 Kapittel 1 Innledning s. 6 1.1 Tema og problemstilling s. 6 1.1.1 Problemstilling s. 7 1.2 Kilder s. 8 1.2.1 Krigslitteratur s. 8 1.2.2 Aviser og radio s. 9 1.2.3 Dikt, memoarer og skjønnlitteratur s. 10 1.2.4 Muntlige kilder s. 10 1.2.5 Kilder knyttet til Nordsjøfartmuseet s. 11 1.3 Metode s. 11 Kapittel 2 Historie og offentlighet – teoretisk grunnlag s. 13 2.1 Maurice Halbwachs: Kollektiv erindring s. 13 2.1.1 Hvordan kollektiverindring oppstår s. 13 2.1.2 Autobiografisk minne og historisk minne s. 15 2.1.3 Kollektiv erindring i tid og rom s. 16 2.2 Jan Assmann: Kommunikativ og kulturell erindring s. 16 2.3 Pierre Nora: Lieux de memoire s. 19 2.4 Historiekultur s. 20 2.5 Okkupasjonstiden som kollektiv erindring s. 21 2.5.1 Den norske okkupasjonstiden som kollektiv erindring s. 21 2.5.2 Den danske okkupasjonstiden som kollektiv erindring s. 25 2 2.6 Museet og dets presentasjon av fortiden s. 27 2.6.1 Hva er et museum? s. 27 2.6.2 Historieformidling i museet s. 29 2.7 Teori og praksis s. 30 Kapittel 3 Kilder og forskning om Telavåghistorien s. 32 3.1 Kilder til Telavåghistorien s. 32 3.1.2 Skriftlige kilder s. 32 3.1.3 Muntlige kilder s. 33 3.2 Forskningsfronten s.
[Show full text]
I Skyggen Av 9. April
I skyggen av 9. april - Forsvarets Overkommando i London og planleggingen av etterkrigsforsvaret Av Johan Fredrik Holst Høsten 2008 Institutt for arkeologi, konservering og historie Universitetet i Oslo 1 Innhold: FORORD..................................................................................................................................................................3 INNLEDNING.........................................................................................................................................................4 BAKGRUNN OG OPPGAVENS STRUKTUR...............................................................................................................4 FORSVARET SOM FORSKNINGSFELT .....................................................................................................................6 KILDER OG METODE .............................................................................................................................................8 METODOLOGI - AKTØR/STRUKTUR ....................................................................................................................10 PROBLEMSTILLING OG TEORI .............................................................................................................................13 KAPITTEL 1: GJENOPPRETTELSEN AV FORSVARETS OVERKOMMANDO I LONDON ........15 1.1 SAMARBEIDSPROBLEMER OG BRITISK SKEPSIS .......................................................................................16 1.2 NY FORSVARSMINISTER OG NYORDNING AV FORSVARSLEDELSEN........................................................20
[Show full text]
Vedtak Om Tillatelse Til Boring, Produksjon Og Drift for Martin Linge
Equinor Energy AS Postboks 8500 Forus 4035 Stavanger Oslo, 24. juli 2020 Deres ref.: Vår ref. (bes oppgitt ved svar): Saksbehandler: AU-TPD-PM701-00037-001 2019/444 Bjørn Christensen Vedtak om tillatelse til boring, produksjon og drift for Martin Linge Vi viser til søknad datert 25. april 2019. Vi viser også til tilleggsinformasjon gitt i brev av 19. februar 2020 og 15. juni 2020, samt annen korrespondanse om saken. 1 Vedtak Miljødirektoratet gir tillatelse til boring, produksjon og drift på Martin Linge. Tillatelsen erstatter tillatelsen til produksjonsboring med siste endring av 19. mars 2018 og den midlertidige tillatelsen til bruk og utslipp av kjemikalier fra ferskvannssystem på Martin Linge B gitt i vedtak av 13. mai 2020. Tillatelsen med krav og vilkår ligger vedlagt. Innen 31. desember 2021 skal Equinor redegjøre for muligheter for å øke injeksjonen av produsert vann, jf. vilkår 14 i tillatelsen. Tillatelsen gis etter forurensningsloven § 11 jf. § 16, jf. HMS-forskriftene for petroleums- virksomheten. Krav til beredskap mot akutt forurensning er gitt etter forurensningsloven § 40, jf. HMS- forskriftene for petroleumsvirksomheten. Equinor skal betale et gebyr for Miljødirektoratets saksbehandling. Gebyret fastsettes til 166 500 kroner. Vedtaket om gebyr fastsettes med hjemmel i forurensningsforskriften § 39-4. Dersom Equinor ikke tar i bruk tillatelsen eller deler av tillatelsen innen fire år, må operatøren informere Miljødirektoratet om dette. Vi vil da vurdere om tillatelsen fortsatt skal gjelde, eller om den skal endres eller trekkes tilbake. Postadresse: Postboks 5672, Sluppen, 7485 Trondheim | Telefon: 03400/73 58 05 00 | Faks: 73 58 05 01 E-post: [email protected] | Internett: www.miljødirektoratet.no | Organisasjonsnummer: 999 601 391 Besøksadresser: Brattørkaia 15, 7010 Trondheim | Grensesvingen 7, 0661 Oslo| 1 Side 2 av 14 2 Kort om bakgrunnen for saken Martin Linge-feltet er lokalisert i den nordvestre delen av Nordsjøen (blokk 29/6, 29/9, 30/7 og 30/4) og omfatter produksjonslisensene PL043, PL043BS og PL040.
[Show full text]
Av Jon Hole INNHALDSLISTE
GJENNOM KRIG TIL FRIDOM Utgitt av Bygdesogenemnda i Sykkylven — 1985 — Av Jon Hole INNHALDSLISTE APRILDAGANE 11940................................................................................................................................... 3 Blir det krig?................................................................................................................................ 3 Ut i krigen ................................................................................................................................... 3 Krig............................................................................................................................................. 4 Englandsfararane ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Til Sverige ............................................................................................................ ..................................... 5 E I N M E R K J E D A G ....................................................................................................................................... 6 DAGBOKA TIL BJARNE TUSVIK............................................................................................................ 6 KRIGSDELTAKARANE .............................................................................................................................. 7 DEI FALL FOR FEDRELANDET .............................................................................................................
[Show full text]
THE NORWEGIAN PETROLEUM SECTOR Cover: the First Oil Field in the North Sea, the Ekofisk Field, Started Production in 1971
2014 2014 THE NORWEGIAN PETROLEUM SECTOR Cover: The first oil field in the North Sea, the Ekofisk field, started production in 1971. The field has been developed and expanded through- out the years. Old facilities have been removed and new ones installed in order to enable production for another 30–40 years. This picture shows the field as it emerges today, after three new facilities were installed in the summer of 2013 (Photo: Kjetil Alsvik/ConocoPhillips) New native apps for Android and Windows Phone are now available • All the fields • All the wells • All the production • All the operators • All the licenses • News, maps and more www.oilfacts.no 2014 THE NORWEGIAN PETROLEUM SECTOR What do you think about Facts 2014? Please send your comments to [email protected]. PB • FACTS 2014 Editor: Yngvild Tormodsgard, Ministry of Petroleum and Energy Design: Artdirector/Klas Jønsson Paper: Cover: Galerie art silk 250 g, Inside pages: Arctic silk 115 g Graphic production: 07 MEDIA Printing: 07 MEDIA Circulation: 13 500 New Norwegian / 12 000 English Publication number: Y-0103/15 E Cover: The Ekofisk Field in the North Sea (Photo : Kjetil Alsvik/ConocoPhillips) ISSN 1504-3398 4 • FACTS 2014 Tord Lien Minister of Petroleum and Energy Minister of Petroleum and Energy 2013 was yet another good year in the Norwegian petroleum sector. profitability of both projects and companies. The industry must take The activity level is high; the shelf is explored, resources discovered, action to control these costs. Succeeding with this will be crucial in fields developed and hydrocarbons produced and sold.
[Show full text]
231: Wwii and Norway’S Resistance
Sons of Norway Information Bank #231: WWII AND NORWAY’S RESISTANCE Image: The surrender of Akershus Fortress in Oslo, Norway. The German garnison’s com- mander Major Josef Nichterlein and his aide Captain Hamel handing the fortress over to the Norwegian resistance movement’s Terje Rollem in May 1945. INTRODUCTION GERMAN INVASION OF NORWAY Following the unstable culmination of World War I (1914-1918) and Germany’s invasion of Poland meant the start of World War II. The the Versailles Treaty, Germany’s economy and postwar climate was Norwegian Labor Party at the time was very much a supporter of equal- bleak. Two decades later it seemed as though another war was immi- ity and pacifism so their decision to remain neutral during WWI into nent and Germany was out for vengeance. Struggling to rebuild, Ger- WWII was no surprise. The doctrine of neutrality was to protect that many appointed Adolf Hitler as Reich Chancellor in 1933. With Hitler right. However, Hitler’s demand for power overrode any attempt at as the country’s leader, Germany writhed to harness world domination. neutrality. He knew that by taking control of Norway the Nazi’s were in Hitler and the National Socialist Party (Nazi Party) convinced the Ger- control of the North Atlantic and most importantly access to Sweden’s man people that the country needed him in order to secure a superior iron ore supplier through Norway’s port of Narvik. Hitler’s plan was future. However, greed and power led the war down a devastating path to take control of Norway but remain friendly in order to align the two of destruction.
[Show full text]