DOCSLIB.ORG

(Hessen). Untersuchungszeitraum 1999- 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Hessen). Untersuchungszeitraum 1999- 2001 BLICK, T. & DOROW, W. H. O. 2014. Weitere Tiergruppen im Naturwaldreservat Kinzigaue (Hessen). Untersuchungszeitraum 1999- 2001. In: BLICK, T.; DOROW, W. H. O. & KÖHLER, G.: Kinzigaue. Zoologische Untersuchungen 1999-2001, Teil 2. Naturwaldreservate in Hessen 13: 161-192. Weitere Tiergruppen im Naturwaldreservat Kinzigaue (Hessen). Untersuchungszeitraum 1999–2001 Theo Blick & Wolfgang H. O. Dorow Kurzfassung Dank zahlreicher überwiegend ehrenamtlicher Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter konnte eine ganze Reihe weitere Tiergruppen auf unterschiedlichem Niveau (vollständig, Teilgruppen, Stichproben) bearbeitet werden. Die Amphibia, Amphipoda, Branchiopoda, Ephemeroptera, Hirudinea, Isopoda, Mammalia, Maxillopoda, Neuroptera, Opiliones, Orthoptera, Pseudoscorpiones, Plecoptera, Psocoptera, Psylloidea, Raphidioptera und Trichoptera wurden vollständig bearbeitet und werden hier, ebenso wie bemerkenswerte Arten aus unvollständig bearbeiteten Gruppen, vorgestellt. Es wird kurz die Biologie der betreffenden Gruppe präsentiert, danach wird auf Arten- und Individuenzahlen, bemerkenswerte Arten sowie die Repräsentativität der Erfassungen eingegangen und Vergleiche mit Ergebnissen aus den zuvor untersuchten hessischen Naturwaldreservaten gezogen. Zahlreiche bemerkenswerte Arten und interessante ökologische Zusammenhänge liefern wertvolle Ergänzungen für ein umfassendes Bild der Fauna des Naturwaldreservats Kinzigaue. Alle nachgewiesenen Arten der Opiliones, Pseudoscorpiones, Isopoda und Syrphidae wurde bezüglich ihrer Waldbindung eingestuft. Für Loewia erecta Bergström, 2007 (Diptera: Tachinidae) gelang der Erstnachweis für Deutschland, für Stenopsocus stigmaticus (Imhoff & Labram, 1846) (Psocoptera: Stenopsocidae) und Coniopteryx hoelzeli H. Aspöck, 1964 (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae) die Erstnachweise für Hessen. Die Forschungsarbeiten wurden in Kooperation mit dem „Landesbetrieb Hessen-Forst“ durchgeführt und durch diesen finanziell gefördert. Abstract Further animal groups of the Strict Forest Reserve Kinzigaue (Hesse, Germany). Investigation period 1999–2001 With the help of numerous mainly voluntary contributors it was possible to incorporate further animal groups in the study, investigated at different levels of intensity (completely, subgroups, random samples). Of these, the Amphibia, Amphipoda, Branchiopoda, Ephemeroptera, Hirudinea, Isopoda, Mammalia, Maxillopoda, Neuroptera, Opiliones, Orthoptera, Pseudoscorpiones, Plecoptera, Psocoptera, Psylloidea, Raphidioptera and Trichoptera were studied completely and the results are presented here together with remarkable species from incompletely studied groups. After a short description of the biology of each group, numbers of species and individuals, remarkable species and the representativeness of the assessment are discussed. Finally the results are compared to those from forest reserves in Hesse that had been previously studied. Numerous remarkable species and interesting ecological relationships represent valuable additional aspects of the larger picture of the fauna of the Kinzigaue forest reserve. All recorded species of the Opiliones, Pseudoscorpiones, Isopoda and Syrphidae were categorized concerning their relationship to forests. Loewia erecta Bergström, 2007 (Diptera: Tachinidae) was recorded for the first time for Germany, Stenopsocus stigmaticus (Imhoff & Labram, 1846) (Psocoptera: Stenopsocidae) and Coniopteryx hoelzeli H. Aspöck, 1964 (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae) for the first time for Hesse. Research was conducted in cooperation with and financially supported by “Landesbetrieb Hessen-Forst”. Keywords: Amphibia, Amphipoda, biodiversity, Branchiopoda, Central Europe, Coniopteryx hoelzeli, Crustacea, Diptera, faunistics, Hirudinea, Isopoda, long term studies, lowland forest, Loewia erecta, Mammalia, Neuroptera, Opiliones, Orthoptera, Pseudoscorpiones, Plecoptera, Psocoptera, Psylloidea, Quercus robur, Stenopsocus stigmaticus, Syrphidae, Raphidioptera, Trichoptera Kontakt: Theo BLICK, Dr. Wolfgang H. O. DOROW, Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum, Projekt Hessische Naturwaldreservate, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, E-Mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 161 Naturwaldreservate in Hessen, Band 13 Kinzigaue. Zoologische Untersuchungen 1999–2001, Teil 2 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Einleitung ..................................................................................................................................................................................164 2 Waldbindungseinstufung ..........................................................................................................................................................164 3 Hirudinea (Egel) ........................................................................................................................................................................165 4 Opiliones (Weberknechte) ........................................................................................................................................................166 4.1 Waldbindung ...................................................................................................................................................................167 4.2 Bemerkenswerte Arten ..................................................................................................................................................168 5 Pseudoscorpiones (Pseudoskorpione).....................................................................................................................................170 5.1 Waldbindung ..................................................................................................................................................................171 5.2 Bemerkenswerte Arten ..................................................................................................................................................172 6 Crustacea (Krebse) ...................................................................................................................................................................173 6.1 Isopoda (Asseln) .............................................................................................................................................................173 6.1.1 Waldbindung .....................................................................................................................................................174 6.2 Amphipoda (Flohkrebse) ................................................................................................................................................175 6.3 Branchiopoda (Blattfußkrebse) und Maxillopoda (Kieferfüßer) ....................................................................................175 7 Plecoptera (Steinfliegen)...........................................................................................................................................................175 8 Orthoptera (Heuschrecken) ......................................................................................................................................................176 9 Sternorrhyncha: Psylloidea (Blattflöhe) ....................................................................................................................................177 10 Psocoptera (Staubläuse) ........................................................................................................................................................177 11 Megaloptera (Schlammfliegen), Neuroptera (Echte Netzflügler) und Raphidioptera (Kamelhalsfliegen) .............................179 12 Trichoptera (Köcherfliegen) und Ephemeroptera (Eintagsfliegen) .........................................................................................181 13 Diptera (Zweiflügler, Fliegen und Mücken) .............................................................................................................................183 13.1 Bemerkenswerte Arten .................................................................................................................................................184 13.2 Wald- und Totholzbindung der Syrphidae....................................................................................................................185 14 Amphibia (Lurche) und Reptilia (Kriechtiere)..........................................................................................................................185 15 Mammalia (Säugetiere) ...........................................................................................................................................................186 15.1 Kleinsäuger ...................................................................................................................................................................186 15.2 Fledermäuse ................................................................................................................................................................186 15.3 Jagdbares Wild .............................................................................................................................................................187 16 Dank ......................................................................................................................................................................................187 17 Literatur ...................................................................................................................................................................................187
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PSOCOPTERA – BARKFLIES by Alan R
    NEGLECTED INSECTS IN BEDFORDSHIRE Beds Natural History Society Conference PSOCOPTERA – BARKFLIES by Alan R. Outen & Ian K. Dawson PSOCOPTERA Barkflies and Booklice (also sometimes referred to as Psocids) Small insects (1.5 – 7mm) with a domed postclypeus (the area at the front of the head between antennae and mouth); long filiform antennae; simple wing venation with two ‘triangular’ cells at tip of forewing; tendency to run rather than fly. Winged barkflies usually hold their wings tent-wise over their abdomens like miniature lacewings. These species can be confused with Psyllids but can be distinguished by gently touching them – psyllids jump away, barkflies don’t. Stenopsocus immaculatus – a common species in Beds. Note the strongly domed postclypeus and long filiform antennae Barkflies - Variations on a theme Some species don’t have full-sized (macropterous) wings but have them much reduced (brachypterous) or absent (apterous). They can be confused with springtails (which however will jump away when touched). Cerobasis guestfalica has been Embidopsocus enderleini recorded from several Beds sites An uncommon species not (yet) found in Beds Available Resources • Excellent British Barkflies website which via the gallery has been brilliant in facilitating identification of this group making them accessible to all. • 2005 RES Handbook is also very good. • Keith Alexander who runs the National Recording Scheme is very helpful. Graphopsocus cruciatus – a common and distinctive Bedfordshire species THE 2005 RES handbook is also excellent with keys that are much easier to follow than many mycological ones ! …….. A Stereo zoom binocular microscope is very useful though not essential ….. …….It is remarkable what can be achieved with the aid of digital photography !! Stenopsocus immaculatus PSOCOPTERA – BARKFLIES 98 British spp in total of which 69 live outdoors, the rest are synanthropic.
    [Show full text]
  • Univerzita Palackého V Olomouci PÍrodov Decká Fakulta Katedra Zoologie a Ornitologická Laborato 
    UNIVERZITA PALACKÉHO V OLOMOUCI PÍRODOV DECKÁ FAKULTA KATEDRA ZOOLOGIE A ORNITOLOGICKÁ LABORATO Význam a ochrana bezlesí Hrubého Jeseníku z hlediska biodiverzity brouk (Coleoptera) DOKTORSKÁ DISERTA NÍ PRÁCE Josef Kašák Vedoucí práce: doc. RNDr. Jaroslav Starý, Ph.D. Konzultant: RNDr. Tomáš Kuras, Ph.D. Olomouc 2015 Bibliografická identifikace: Jméno a p íjmení autora: Josef Kašák Název práce: Význam a ochrana bezlesí Hrubého Jeseníku z hlediska biodiverzity brouk (Coleoptera) Typ práce: doktorská diserta ní práce Pracovišt : Katedra zoologie a ornitologická laborato , P írodov decká fakulta, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci Vedoucí práce: doc. RNDr. Jaroslav Starý, Ph.D. Konzultant: RNDr. Tomáš Kuras, Ph.D. Studijní program: P1527 Biologie Studijní obor: Zoologie Rok obhajoby práce: 2015 Abstrakt: Biodiverzita jako variabilita života poskytuje lidské spole nosti adu nezbytných zdroj , ekosystémových služeb a p edstavuje také významnou kulturní hodnotu. Na druhé stran však dochází sou asn k jejímu ochuzování v souvislosti s rozvojem lidské spole nosti. Z pohledu ochrany p írody se proto horské ekosystémy adí mezi jedno z nejcenn jších a nejohrožen jších prost edí v globálním m ítku. V rámci p edložené doktorské práce byly studovány vybrané potenciáln významné antropické vlivy na biodiverzitu horských bezlesí Hrubého Jeseníku prost ednictvím modelové bioindika ní skupiny brouk (Coleoptera). V prostoru primárního bezlesí arkto- alpinní tundry byl studován vliv sjezdových tratí a invazivní d eviny borovice kle e ( Pinus mugo ) na spole enstva brouk . Na území sekundárních bezlesí podhorských luk a pastvin byl hodnocen vliv zem dlského hospoda ení na brouky a další bezobratlé. Studium vlivu lyža ského areálu prokázalo, že p estože jsou sjezdové trat v alpínské zón zájmového území provozovány zp sobem šetrným k vegetaci, tak pr kazn m ní pvodní spole enstva epigeických brouk .
    [Show full text]
  • Entomologist's Record
    NOTES 11 Peripsocus consobrinus Pearman, 1951 (Psoc.: Peripsocidae) in Scotland The identification characters of Peripsocus consobrinus were based on the single female holotype collected by J. V. Pearman at Brockley Combe, Somerset in 1930. The main features are: 1. Forewings with darker marks within cells, particularly the apical cells (Fig. 1). 2. The apical lobe of the subgenital plate short and truncated. The pigmented arms that normally form a distinct V shape in Peripsocus species are reduced to wedge shaped remnants (Fig. 2). The variability of these characters has remained unknown for many years since no further specimens of the species were found. The species accounts in New (1974. Handbooks for the identification of British Insects 1 (7): 1-102) give the impression that P. consobrinus is the only Peripsocus species having the distinctively marked forewings. Consequently, when the author found a female Peripsocus specimen with a very similar wing pattern at Coalbrookdale, Shropshire on 3.viii.2004 it was initially considered as a potential second specimen. However, the features of the subgenital plate were clearly that of P. didymus and the identification as this latter species was confirmed by Charles Lienhard (Geneva Natural History Museum). He also mentioned that Roesler (1939. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Copeognathenfauna Deutschlands. Zoologischer Anzeiger 125(7/8): 157-176) had observed this aberrant wing pattern and it was noted in the original description of P. didymus: ‘… bisweilen in den Aussenzellen des Vorderflügels zwischen der Radialgabel und den Aesten der Media schwärzliche Keilflecke.’ On 23.viii.2007, I collected several Peripsocus specimens from a Sitka Spruce plantation near Auchindrain, Argyll, Scotland (O.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Psocid Taxocenoses (Insecta: Psocoptera) in the Forest Ecosystems of the Querci-Fageta S
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS AGRICULTURAE ET SILVICULTURAE MENDELIANAE BRUNENSIS Volume LXI 70 Number 3, 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201361030637 PSOCID TAXOCENOSES (INSECTA: PSOCOPTERA) IN THE FOREST ECOSYSTEMS OF THE QUERCI-FAGETA S. LAT. ZONE IN THE WESTERN CARPATHIAN MTS. AND POLONIC SUBPROVINCY Otakar Holuša Received: January 4, 2013 Abstract HOLUŠA OTAKAR: Psocid taxocenoses (Insecta: Psocoptera) in the forest ecosystems of the Querci-fageta s. lat. zone in the Western Carpathian Mts. and Polonic subprovincy. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 2013, LXI, No. 3, pp. 637–646 Structure of psocid taxocenoses (Psocoptera) were intensively studied in forest ecosystems of the Western Carpathian Mts. and Polonic biogeographical subprovincy during 1997–2001 in the Czech Republic. Vegetation tiers (= altitudinal vegetation zones) were used as a study frame. Only a part of material, i.e. individuals that was found in the forest ecosystems of Querci-fageta s. lat. communities (= the 3rd oak-beech vegetation tier) was evaluated for purpose of this work. This vegetation tier is widespread in large part of the Opavská pahorkatina hills, in large parts of Podbeskydská pahorktina hills, in the Bílé Karpaty hills and in the foothills of the Vsetínské vrchy hills. 1201 adults comprising 29 species were found in total in the 3rd vegetation tier. As eudominant species, the following ones were found: Peripsocus subfasciatus, Caecilius fl avius and Stenopsocus lachlani, as dominant species, the following ones were found: Philotarsus parviceps and Caecilius piceus. In natural geobiocenoses with the level of naturalness of 1 or 2, the following species were found: as eudominant species: Caecilius fl avidus, Peripsocus phaeopterus, as dominant species, the following ones were found: Caecilius piceus, Peripsocus subfasciatus, Philotarsus parviceps and Elipsocus moebiusi.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta: Psocoptera) in Forests in the Drahanská Vrchovina Hills (Czech Republic)
    JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 62, 2016 (5): 211–222 doi: 10.17221/97/2015-JFS The first contribution to the fauna of psocids (Insecta: Psocoptera) in forests in the Drahanská vrchovina Hills (Czech Republic) D. Mazáč Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic ABSTRACT: Taxocenosis of psocids (Psocoptera) was studied in the territory of the Drahanská vrchovina Hills in the Czech Republic. Representative research plots were selected in forest ecosystems with natural species composition and spatial structure (small-scale strictly protected areas) as well as in forest ecosystems with altered tree species composi- tion and spatial structure. Research was conducted in three altitudinal vegetation zones (AVZ): in 2nd communities of Fagi-querceta s. lat. (beech-oak forests), 3rd Querci-fageta s. lat. (oak-beech forests) and 4th Fageta abietis (beech forests with fir). Research plots are situated at altitudes ranging between 275 and 540 m a.s.l. In the 2013 growing season, totally 3,474 imagoes and 2,532 nymphs of 32 psocid species were collected. Of those, 748 imagoes of 25 psocid species were collected in Fagi-querceta. The occurrence of Caecilius burmeisteri, Caecilius flavidus and Graphopsocus cruciatus was eudominant. 2,194 imagoes of 23 psocid species were found in Querci-fageta, eudominant were there Caecilius flavidus and Caecilius burmeisteri. 532 imagoes of 18 psocid species were found in Fageta abietis, eudominant were there: Caecilius flavidus, Peripsocus subfasciatus and Caecilius burmeisteri. In respect to the species composition, 3rd AVZ and 4th AVZ are similar to each other while 2nd AVZ is less similar.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Distribution of Arthropods in Native Forests of the Azores Archipelago
    Diversity and distribution of arthropods in native forests of the Azores archipelago CLARA GASPAR1,2, PAULO A.V. BORGES1 & KEVIN J. GASTON2 Gaspar, C., P.A.V. Borges & K.J. Gaston 2008. Diversity and distribution of arthropods in native forests of the Azores archipelago. Arquipélago. Life and Marine Sciences 25: 01-30. Since 1999, our knowledge of arthropods in native forests of the Azores has improved greatly. Under the BALA project (Biodiversity of Arthropods of Laurisilva of the Azores), an extensive standardised sampling protocol was employed in most of the native forest cover of the Archipelago. Additionally, in 2003 and 2004, more intensive sampling was carried out in several fragments, resulting in nearly a doubling of the number of samples collected. A total of 6,770 samples from 100 sites distributed amongst 18 fragments of seven islands have been collected, resulting in almost 140,000 specimens having been caught. Overall, 452 arthropod species belonging to Araneae, Opilionida, Pseudoscorpionida, Myriapoda and Insecta (excluding Diptera and Hymenoptera) were recorded. Altogether, Coleoptera, Hemiptera, Araneae and Lepidoptera comprised the major proportion of the total diversity (84%) and total abundance (78%) found. Endemic species comprised almost half of the individuals sampled. Most of the taxonomic, colonization, and trophic groups analysed showed a significantly left unimodal distribution of species occurrences, with almost all islands, fragments or sites having exclusive species. Araneae was the only group to show a strong bimodal distribution. Only a third of the species was common to both the canopy and soil, the remaining being equally exclusive to each stratum. Canopy and soil strata showed a strongly distinct species composition, the composition being more similar within the same stratum regardless of the location, than within samples from both strata at the same location.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised Bibliography of the Psocoptera (Arthropoda: Insecta)
    ISSN 1031-8062 ISBN 0 7305 9889 6 A Revised Bibliography of the Psocoptera (Arthropoda: Insecta) C.N. Smithers & C. Lienhard Technical Reports of the Australian Museum Number6 TECHNICAL REPORTS OF THE AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM Director: Technical Reports of the Australian Museum is D.J.G. Griffin a series of occasional papers which publishes Editor: bibliographies, catalogues, surveys, and data bases in J.K. Lowry the fields of anthropology, geology and zoology. The Production Editor: journal is an adjunct to Records of the Australian J.E. Gates Museum and the Supplement series which publish original research in natural history. It is designed for Associate Editors: the quick dissemination of information at a moderate Anthropology: cost. The information is relevant to Australia, the J.R. Specht South-west Pacific and the Indian Ocean area. Invertebrates: Submitted manuscripts are reviewed by external W.B.Rudman referees. A reasonable number of copies are distributed to scholarly institutions in Australian and Geology: F.L. Sutherland around the world. Submitted manuscripts should be addressed to the Vertebrates: Editor, Australian Museum, P.O. Box A285, Sydney A.E. Greer South, N.S.W. 2000, Australia. Manuscripts should ©Copyright Australian Museum, 1992 preferably be on 3V2 or 514 inch diskettes in DOS No part of this publication may be reproduced without format and should include an original and two copies. permission of the Editor. Technical Reports are not available through Produced by the Australian Museum subscription. New issues will be announced in the 8July, 1992 Records. Orders should be addressed to the $16.00 bought at the Australian Museum Production Editor (Community Relations), Australian $18.50 posted within Australia or New Zealand Museum, PO Box A285, Sydney South, NSW 2000, $21 .00 posted airmail to other countries Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Psocid News the Psocidologists’ Newsletter No
    ISSN 1348–0359 (print edition) ISSN 1348-1770 (online edition) Sapporo, Japan Psocid News The Psocidologists’ Newsletter No. 7 (Feb. 28, 2005) Lichenomima sp. (Ryukyus, Japan) ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS (PART 4) TO LIENHARD & SMITHERS, 2002: "PSOCOPTERA (INSECTA) - WORLD CATALOGUE AND BIBLIOGRAPHY" Charles Lienhard (Geneva Natural History Museum, Switzerland) 1. Introduction This is the fourth part of a series of "Additions and Corrections to the World Catalogue and Bibliography" which will be published in "Psocid News". Please remember to send me copies of your papers on Psocoptera, and indicate to me all the errors you find in the 2002-book (=Lienhard & Smithers, 2002). If papers which came to your notice are not treated in the "Additions", please send me the bibliographical references by e-mail. In the "Additions to the Bibliography", references to the papers which I have not yet seen are marked with "(Not seen)". Please send me a copy of these papers if you feel concerned. Only papers which I have seen are analysed for the "Additions to the Catalogue", except those "(Not seen)"-papers where the matter they deal with is clearly indicated in the title or in the abstract. The other papers will be analysed in a future part of the "Additions to the Catalogue", as soon as a copy of them becomes available to me. In general, these "Additions" present the information in the style of the 2002-book, according to the criteria mentioned there (pp. ix-xli) and using the same abbreviations (cf. pp. xl-xli). Families (and higher categories, if mentioned) are listed according to Table 1 of the 2002-book (for Amphipsocidae see Yoshizawa, 2001b; cf.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records and Detailed Distribution and Abundance of Selected Arthropod Species Collected Between 1999 and 2011 in Azorean Native Forests
    New records and detailed distribution and abundance of selected arthropod species collected between 1999 and 2011 in Azorean native forests Borges, Paulo A. V.; Gaspar, Clara; Crespo, Luís Carlos Fonseca; Rigal, François; Cardoso, Pedro; Pereira, Fernando; Rego, Carla; Amorim, Isabel R.; Melo, Catarina; Aguiar, Carlos; André, Genage; Mendonça, Enésima P.; Ribeiro, Sérvio; Hortal, Joaquín; Santos, Ana M. C.; Barcelos, Luís; Enghoff, Henrik; Mahnert, Volker; Pita, Margarida T.; Ribes, Jordi; Baz, Arturo; Sousa, António B.; Vieira, Virgílio; Wunderlich, Jörg; Parmakelis, Aristeidis; Whittaker, Robert J.; Quartau, José Alberto; Serrano, Artur R. M.; Triantis, Kostas A. Published in: Biodiversity Data Journal DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.4.e10948 Publication date: 2016 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Borges, P. A. V., Gaspar, C., Crespo, L. C. F., Rigal, F., Cardoso, P., Pereira, F., Rego, C., Amorim, I. R., Melo, C., Aguiar, C., André, G., Mendonça, E. P., Ribeiro, S., Hortal, J., Santos, A. M. C., Barcelos, L., Enghoff, H., Mahnert, V., Pita, M. T., ... Triantis, K. A. (2016). New records and detailed distribution and abundance of selected arthropod species collected between 1999 and 2011 in Azorean native forests. Biodiversity Data Journal, 4, [e10948]. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e10948 Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e10948 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.4.e10948 Taxonomic Paper New records and detailed distribution and abundance of selected arthropod species collected between 1999 and 2011 in Azorean native forests Paulo A.V. Borges‡‡, Clara Gaspar , Luís Carlos Fonseca Crespo§,‡, François Rigal |,‡, Pedro Cardoso¶, ‡, Fernando Pereira‡‡, Carla Rego , Isabel R.
    [Show full text]
  • Psocid News : the Psocidologists' Newsletter
    Title Psocid News : The Psocidologists' Newsletter Author(s) Yoshizawa, Kazunori Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/35519 Type other Note edited by Kazunori Yoshizawa at the Systematic Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University Additional Information There are other files related to this item in HUSCAP. Check the above URL. File Information 020 PN_20.pdf (No. 20 (Feb. 28, 2018)) Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP ISSN 1348-1770 Sapporo, Japan Psocid News The Psocidologists’ Newsletter No. 20 (Feb 28, 2018) In-flight wing-coupling structure of Metylophorus sp. (Psocidae) (© Naoki Ogawa: See Ogawa & Yoshizawa, 2017b) AUTHORITIES FOR FAMILY-GROUP NAMES OF TROGIOMORPHA (INSECTA: PSOCODEA: 'PSOCOPTERA') By Charles LIENHARD and Kazunori YOSHIZAWA Authors' address. Lienhard, C.: Geneva Natural History Museum, CP 6434, 1211 Geneva 6, Switzerland (corresponding author: [email protected]). Yoshizawa, K.: Systematic Entomology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan. Introduction Unfortunately, a comprehensive documentation of authorities for family-group names is lacking for psocids. This lack of information is particularly problematic in a period when phylogenetic research results in the frequent propositions of new classifications (e. g. Yoshizawa & Johnson, 2014; Yoshizawa et al., 2014; Yoshizawa, 2016). According to the principle of coordination applied to family-group names (ICZN Article 36) each name can be used in all ranks of the family-group with the same authorship and date, the rank-specific suffixes being -ina (subtribe), -ini (tribe), -inae (subfamily), -idae (family) and -oidea (superfamily). All family-group names of the suborder Trogiomorpha that we were able to retrieve from the literature are listed here, including names based on fossil genera clearly assignable to Psocoptera (see Mockford et al., 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Psocid News : the Psocidologists' Newsletter. Special
    Title Psocid News : The Psocidologists' Newsletter Author(s) Yoshizawa, Kazunori Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/35519 Type other Note edited by Kazunori Yoshizawa at the Systematic Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University Additional Information There are other files related to this item in HUSCAP. Check the above URL. File Information PN_S4.pdf (Special Issue 4 (May 27, 2021)) Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP ISSN 1348-1770 (online edition) Sapporo, Japan Psocid News The Psocidologists' Newsletter Special Issue IV (May 27, 2021) SYNTHESIS OF PARTS 11-20 OF THE ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO LIENHARD & SMITHERS, 2002: "PSOCOPTERA (INSECTA) – WORLD CATALOGUE AND BIBLIOGRAPHY" Charles LIENHARD (Geneva Natural History Museum, Switzerland) E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Since the volume Psocoptera (Insecta) – World Catalogue and Bibliography was published by the Geneva Natural History Museum in 2002, twenty supplementary papers of additions and corrections have appeared in Psocid News. All available literature on Psocoptera was treated in the same style as the Catalogue (listed taxonomically, faunistically and thematically). For ease of use a synthesis of the first ten supplements was published as Special Issue 3 of Psocid News (Lienhard, 2016d). The present compilation offers a synthesis of the supplements 11 to 20 (published annually between 2012 and 2021 in Psocid News No. 14-23) and it contains a complement to the Subject Bibliography published
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article
    Ecologica Montenegrina 11: 74-79 (2017) This journal is available online at: www.biotaxa.org/em Little known and newly recorded species of Psocoptera in Bulgaria DILIAN GEORGIEV Department of Ecology and Environmental Conservation, University of Plovdiv, Tzar Assen Str. 24, BG-4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria, email: [email protected] Received: 6 September 2017│ Accepted by V. Pešić: 27 September 2017 │ Published online: 29 September 2017. The insects from the order Psocoptera are poorly studied in Bulgaria (Lienhard & Smithers 2002). In this note I report of nineteen species of Psocoptera which were little known or were not recorded in this country. The study was carried out between 22.9.2016 and 27.8.2017 from seven geographic regions of Bulgaria (Fig. 1): Upper Thracian Lowland, Black Sea Coast, and the mountains of Sakar, Strandzha, Rhodopes, Pirin and Sarnena Gora. All specimens were collected and identified by the author. The barklice were searched by following methods: 1. Actively searched under tree bark and collected by hand; 2. Sieving with 1 mm mesh width sieve of detritus or crushed tree bark particles above white cloth; 3. Beating the vegetation above a sieve; 4. Checking for dead individuals in paddles, beneath windows and in spider webs; 5. Sweep netting of vegetation. Specimens were then over narcotized by diethyl ether, stored in ethanol or glycerin (when prepared on microscope slides), and after processing deposited in the collection of the author. Species identifications and taxonomy followed mainly Lienhard (1998). As supporting sources for some of the species also Saville (2008), Kučerová et al. (2014) and Yang et al.
    [Show full text]