Application of Santana, Madeira to Biosphere Reserve September 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Application of Santana, Madeira to Biosphere Reserve September 2010 APPLICATION OF SANTANA, MADEIRA TO BIOSPHERE RESERVE SEPTEMBER 2010 APPLICATION OF SANTANA, MADEIRA TO BIOSPHERE RESERVE GENERAL COORDINATION MUNICÍPIO DE SANTANA ODÍLIA GARCÊS PRODUCTION TERRA CIDADE, EEM REGINA RIBEIRO FÁBIO PEREIRA TECNHICAL DIRECTION ANTÓNIO DOMINGOS ABREU SÉRGIO MARQUES TEIXEIRA AUTHORS ANTÓNIO DOMINGOS ABREU SÉRGIO MARQUES TEIXEIRA DUARTE COSTA DIVA FREITAS MANUELA MARQUES FILIPA LOJA GRAÇA MATEUS MARIA JOÃO NEVES FERDINANDO ABREU TAMIRA FREITAS COLLABORATION PAULO OLIVEIRA BERNARDO FARIA EUNICE PINTO PHOTOS CARLOS VIVEIROS SECRETARIA REGIONAL DE EDUCAÇÃO E CULTURA - DIRECÇÃO REGIONAL DOS ASSUNTOS CULTURAIS SÉRGIO MARQUES TEIXEIRA VIRGÍLIO GOMES SPNM – PARQUE NATURAL DA MADEIRA TAMIRA FREITAS TERRA CIDADE EEM ACKOWLEDGMENTS A special thanks to the entire population of Santana for the motivation and expressions of support for this application To REDBIOS for the permanent encouragement and technical support that is offering over the past few years to the Autonomous Region of Madeira so that it can also promote the creation of a Biosphere Reserve, that this application is the result. Our thanks to all the officials from different departments of the Regional Government of Madeira, the city of Santana, the school district of Santana, entrepreneurs and local and regional organizations that, since the first time declared their readiness, interest and participation in the application process of Santana Biosphere Reserve. Index Part I: Summary 9 1. Proposed name of the biosphere reserve ................................................................. 9 2. Country .................................................................................................................... 9 3. Fulfillment of the three functions of Biosphere Reserves ....................................... 10 3.1. Conservation ................................................................................................... 10 3.2. Development ................................................................................................... 12 3.3. Logistic support ............................................................................................... 17 4. Criteria for designation as a Biosphere Reserve ..................................................... 19 4.1. Encompass a mosaic of ecological systems representative of major biogeographic regions, including a gradation of human intervention ............................................ 19 4.2. Be of significance for biological diversity conservation ........................................... 22 4.3. Provide na opportunity to explore and demonstrate approaches to sustainable development on a regional scale ........................................................................ 25 4.4. Have na appropriate size to serve the three functions of biosphere reserves ............ 26 4.5. Through appropriate zonation ............................................................................ 28 a) A legally constituted core area or areas devoted to long term protection, acording to the conservation objectives of the biosphere reserve, and of suficient size to meet these objectives.......................................................... 28 4.6. Organizational arrangements should be provided for the involvement and participation of a suitable range of inter alia public authorities, local communities and private interests in the design and the carrying out of the functions of a biosphere reserve ............................................................................................. 47 4.7. Mechanisms for implementation ......................................................................... 48 a) Mechanisms to manage human use and activities in the buffer zone or zones ........... 48 b) A management plan or policy for the area as a Biosphere Reserve .......................... 48 c) A designated authority or mechanism to implement this policy or plan .................... 49 d) Programmes for research, monitoring, education and training ................................ 50 5.1. Signed by the authority/authorities in charge of the management of the core area(s) ........................................................................................................... 52 5.2. Signed by the authority/authorities in charge of the management of the Buffer zone(s) ........................................................................................................... 52 5.3. Signed as appropriate by the national (or state or provincial) administration responsible for the management of the core area(s) and the buffer zone ................ 52 5.4. Signed by the authority/authorities, elected local governement recognized authority or spokesperson representative of the communities located in the transition area ................................................................................................. 52 5.5. Signed on behalf of the MAB National Committee or focal point .............................. 52 Part II: Description 53 6. Location (Latitude and Longitude) ......................................................................... 53 iv Application of Santana, Madeira to Biosphere Reserve – UNESCO - MAB 7. Area ........................................................................................................................ 53 7.1. Size of Core Area(s) .......................................................................................... 53 7.2. Size of Buffer Zone(s) ....................................................................................... 53 7.3. Approximate size of Transition Area(s) ................................................................ 53 7.4. Brief rationale of this zonation ............................................................................ 54 8. Biogeographical Region .......................................................................................... 54 9. Land use history ..................................................................................................... 55 10. Human population of proposed biosphere reserve ................................................ 56 10.1. Core Area(s) .................................................................................................. 56 10.2. Buffer Zone(s) ................................................................................................ 56 10.3. Transition Area(s) .................................................................................... 575756 10.4. Brief description of local communities living within or near the proposed Biosphere Reserve ............................................................................................ 57 10.5. Name of nearest major town ............................................................................ 58 10.6. Cultural significance ................................................................................. 595958 11. Physical Characteristics ........................................................................................ 70 11.1. General description of site charactheristics and topography of area ....................... 70 11.2.1. Highest elevation above sea level ................................................................ 71 11.2.2. Lowest elevation above sea level ................................................................. 71 11.2.3. For coastal/ marine areas, maximum depth below mean sea level ................... 71 11.3. Climate ......................................................................................................... 71 11.3.1. Average temperature of the warmest month ................................................. 71 11.3.2. Average temperatrure of the coldest month .................................................. 71 11.3.3. Mean anual precipitation ............................................................................. 71 11.3.4. If a meteorological station is in or near the proposed Biosphere reserve, indicate the year since when climatic data have been recorded ........................ 71 11.4. Geology, geomorphology, soils ......................................................................... 72 12. Biological Characteristics ...................................................................................... 81 12.1. Terrestrial Area .............................................................................................. 81 12.1.1. Characteristic species .......................................................................... 878786 12.1.2. Important Natural Processes ................................................................ 909089 12.1.3. Main Human Impacts .......................................................................... 919190 12.1.4. Relevant Management Practices............................................................ 929291 12.2. Coastal and Marine Area ........................................................................... 929291 12.2.1. Characteristic species .......................................................................... 969695 12.2.2. Important Natural Processes ................................................................ 979796 12.2.3. Main human impacts ........................................................................... 999998 12.2.4. Relevant management practices ...................................................... 101101100 12.3. Rural area .......................................................................................... 103103102 12.4. Urban
Recommended publications
  • 1 1 DNA Barcodes Reveal Deeply Neglected Diversity and Numerous
    Page 1 of 57 1 DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in 2 Madagascar 3 4 5 Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde1,2, Lucas Sire2, Bruno Rasmussen2, Rodolphe Rougerie3, 6 Christian Wieser4, Allaoui Ahamadi Allaoui 5, Joël Minet3, Jeremy R. deWaard6, Thibaud 7 Decaëns7, David C. Lees8 8 9 1 INRA, UR633, Zoologie Forestière, F- 45075 Orléans, France. 10 2 Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, UMR 7261 CNRS Université de Tours, UFR 11 Sciences et Techniques, Tours, France. 12 3Institut de Systématique Evolution Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, 13 CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 50, 75005 Paris, France. 14 4 Landesmuseum für Kärnten, Abteilung Zoologie, Museumgasse 2, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria 15 5 Department of Entomology, University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar 16 6 Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E., Guelph, ON 17 N1G2W1, Canada 18 7Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS–Université de Genome Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIV GUELPH on 10/03/18 19 Montpellier–Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier–EPHE), 1919 Route de Mende, F-34293 20 Montpellier, France. 21 8Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, SW7 5BD, UK. 22 23 24 Email for correspondence: [email protected] For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from final official version of record. 1 Page 2 of 57 25 26 Abstract 27 Madagascar is a prime evolutionary hotspot globally, but its unique biodiversity is under threat, 28 essentially from anthropogenic disturbance.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcodes Reveal Deeply Neglected Diversity and Numerous Invasions of Micromoths in Madagascar
    Genome DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in Madagascar Journal: Genome Manuscript ID gen-2018-0065.R2 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 17-Jul-2018 Author: Complete List of Authors: Lopez-Vaamonde, Carlos; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), ; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte (IRBI), Sire, Lucas; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte Rasmussen,Draft Bruno; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte Rougerie, Rodolphe; Institut Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Wieser, Christian; Landesmuseum für Kärnten Ahamadi, Allaoui; University of Antananarivo, Department Entomology Minet, Joël; Institut de Systematique Evolution Biodiversite deWaard, Jeremy; Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Decaëns, Thibaud; Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS–Université de Montpellier–Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier–EPHE), , CEFE UMR 5175 CNRS Lees, David; Natural History Museum London Keyword: Africa, invasive alien species, Lepidoptera, Malaise trap, plant pests Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special 7th International Barcode of Life Issue? : https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/genome-pubs Page 1 of 57 Genome 1 DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in 2 Madagascar 3 4 5 Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde1,2, Lucas Sire2, Bruno Rasmussen2, Rodolphe Rougerie3, 6 Christian Wieser4, Allaoui Ahamadi Allaoui 5, Joël Minet3, Jeremy R. deWaard6, Thibaud 7 Decaëns7, David C. Lees8 8 9 1 INRA, UR633, Zoologie Forestière, F- 45075 Orléans, France. 10 2 Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, UMR 7261 CNRS Université de Tours, UFR 11 Sciences et Techniques, Tours, France.
    [Show full text]
  • From Hungary on Zinnia Elegans (Asteraceae)
    Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 55 (2), pp. 223–234 (2020) DOI: 10.1556/038.55.2020.023 A New Leipothrix Species (Acari: Acariformes: Eriophyoidea) from Hungary on Zinnia elegans (Asteraceae) G. RIPKA1*, E. KISS2, J. KONTSCHÁN3 and Á. SZABÓ4 1National Food Chain Safety Office, Directorate of Plant Protection, Soil Conservation and Agri-environment, H-1118 Budapest, Budaörsi út 141-145, Hungary 2Plant Protection Institute, Szent István University, H-2100 Gödöllő, Páter Károly u. 1, Hungary 3Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, H-1525 Budapest, P.O. Box 102, Hungary 4Department of Entomology, Faculty of Horticultural Science, Szent István University, H-1118 Budapest, Villányi út 29-43, Hungary (Received: 11 September 2020; accepted: 12 October 2020) A new vagrant species of phyllocoptine mites, Leipothrix nagyi n. sp. collected from Zinnia elegans (Asteraceae) is described and illustrated from Hungary. Further three eriophyoid species were recorded for the first time in Hungary, viz. Aceria hippophaena (Nalepa, 1898) found on Hippophaë rhamnoides, Epitrimerus cupressi (Keifer, 1939) collected from Cupressus sempervirens and Epitrimerus tanaceti Boczek et Davis, 1984 associated with Tanacetum vulgare. The female of E. tanaceti is re-described, while the male and nymph are described for the first time. Keywords: Eriophyidae, Leipothrix, common zinnia, Asteraceae, Hungary. The large family Asteraceae (Compositae) contains 1,911 plant genera with 32,913 accepted species names (The Plant List, 2013). Representatives of the family Asteraceae are a dominant feature of the Hungarian flora with 267 recognised species. According to Király (2009) it amounts to 9.8% of the current vascular plants of Hungary. An ex- traordinary range of eriophyoids occupy the plants of this family.
    [Show full text]
  • Cochylini Del 2
    Cochylini del 2 Agapeta, Eupoecilia, Aethes (part.) Agapeta hamana (L.) 4268 15-25 mm. Imago flyver sidst på dagen og kommer fint til lys fra maj til august (september). Ikke alle eksem- plarer er så stærkt tegnet som ovenstående. Agapeta hamana (L.) Larven lever overvintrende i i rødderne af forskellige tidsler (Carduus, Cirsium mv.). Udbredt i Europa op til Mellemsverige og Finland. Almindelig. Agapeta largana (Rebel) 4270 16-23 mm. Imago er på vingerne i solens sidste stråler fra sidst i juni gennem juli. Lokalt ikke sjælden på enge. Præimaginale stadier er ukendte. Kendt fra Grækenland, Rumænien, Ungarn, det vestlige Østrig og jeg har selv fundet den flere steder i det sydøstlige Frankrig. Agapeta zoegana (L.) 4271 15-24 mm. Imago flyver i de sidste lyse timer og kommer fint til lys i juli-august. Agapeta zoegana (L.) Larven lever overvintrende i rødderne af Blåhat (Knautia) og Knopurt (Centaurea). Den forpupper sig i rødderne. Agapeta zoegana (L.) Ind i mellem dukker eksemplarer op som er formørket i den yderste tredjedel. Disse eksemparer er gerne mindre end normalt. Agapeta zoegana (L.) I Danmark er der ikke mange findesteder i Jylland og arten mangler helt vest for israndslinjen. I det øvrige land er den ikke sjælden, men sjældent talrig. Nordgrænsen går gennem det sydligste Norge, mellemste Sverige og sydlige Finland. Arten når til Ural og Lilleasien. Eugnosta lathoniana (Hb.) 4279 21-27 mm. Imago flyver sidst på dagen fra midt i maj til sidst i juni. Præimaginale stadier er ukendte. Udbredt i det meste af Sydeuropa, mod nord til Tyskland, men herfra kendes ingen konkrete fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Autographa Gamma
    1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Authors, Reviewers, Draft Log 4 Introduction to the Reference 6 Soybean Background 11 Arthropods 14 Primary Pests of Soybean (Full Pest Datasheet) 14 Adoretus sinicus ............................................................................................................. 14 Autographa gamma ....................................................................................................... 26 Chrysodeixis chalcites ................................................................................................... 36 Cydia fabivora ................................................................................................................. 49 Diabrotica speciosa ........................................................................................................ 55 Helicoverpa armigera..................................................................................................... 65 Leguminivora glycinivorella .......................................................................................... 80 Mamestra brassicae....................................................................................................... 85 Spodoptera littoralis ....................................................................................................... 94 Spodoptera litura .......................................................................................................... 106 Secondary Pests of Soybean (Truncated Pest Datasheet) 118 Adoxophyes orana ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PLUME MOTHS of AFGHANISTAN (LEPIDOPTERA, PTEROPHORIDAE) 1Altai State University, Lenina 61
    Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University 183 UDC 595.7(262.81) Peter Ustjuzhanin,1,6* Vasily Kovtunovich,2 Igor Pljushtch,3 Juriy Skrylnik4, Oleg Pak5 PLUME MOTHS OF AFGHANISTAN (LEPIDOPTERA, PTEROPHORIDAE) 1Altai State University, Lenina 61. RF-656049. Barnaul, Russia. 2 Moscow Society of Nature Explorers. Home address: Russia, Moscow, 121433, Malaya Filevskaya str., 24/1, app. 20. 3Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology, National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Bogdan Khmielnitski str., 15, 01601, Kiev, Ukraine. 4 Ukrainian Research Institute of Forestry & Forest Melioration, 61024, Pushkinska str. 86, Kharkov, Ukraine. 5 Donetsk National University, Faculty of Biology, Shchors str., 46, 83050, Donetsk, Ukraine. 6*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] New data on Pterophoridae from Afghanistan are considered. A checklist of Pterophoridae species of the fauna of Afghanistan is presented, as including 32 species of 14 genera. Merrifieldia tridactyla is for the first time recorded for the fauna of Afghanistan. The basic literature on the Afghanistan Pterophoridae were used in the study. Key words: Pterophoridae, plume moths, Afghanistan, fauna, new data. INTRODUCTION Many Pterophoridae as Cossidae are specific inhabitants of the arid regions of the Palaearctic. Usually deserts are good zoogeographical barriers preventing from mixing the faunas of different zoogeographical regions (Yakovlev & Dubatolov 2013; Yakovlev, 2015; Yakovlev et al., 2015). Until now there were no special publications on Pterophoridae from Afghanistan. The first description of a new species of Pterophoridae, Stenoptilia nurolhaki, from Afghanistan was in the work by Amsel (1967), In a series of works by Ernst Arenberger (1981, 1987, 1995), six new species were described from Afghanistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaderni Del Museo Civico Di Storia Naturale Di Ferrara
    ISSN 2283-6918 Quaderni del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Ferrara Anno 2018 • Volume 6 Q 6 Quaderni del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Ferrara Periodico annuale ISSN. 2283-6918 Editor: STEFA N O MAZZOTT I Associate Editors: CARLA CORAZZA , EM A N UELA CAR I A ni , EN R ic O TREV is A ni Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Ferrara, Italia Comitato scientifico / Advisory board CE S ARE AN DREA PA P AZZO ni FI L ipp O Picc OL I Università di Modena Università di Ferrara CO S TA N ZA BO N AD im A N MAURO PELL I ZZAR I Università di Ferrara Ferrara ALE ss A N DRO Min ELL I LU ci O BO N ATO Università di Padova Università di Padova MAURO FA S OLA Mic HELE Mis TR I Università di Pavia Università di Ferrara CARLO FERRAR I VALER I A LE nci O ni Università di Bologna Museo delle Scienze di Trento PI ETRO BRA N D M AYR CORRADO BATT is T I Università della Calabria Università Roma Tre MAR C O BOLOG N A Nic KLA S JA nss O N Università di Roma Tre Linköping University, Sweden IRE N EO FERRAR I Università di Parma In copertina: Fusto fiorale di tornasole comune (Chrozophora tintoria), foto di Nicola Merloni; sezione sottile di Micrite a foraminiferi planctonici del Cretacico superiore (Maastrichtiano), foto di Enrico Trevisani; fiore di digitale purpurea (Digitalis purpurea), foto di Paolo Cortesi; cardo dei lanaioli (Dipsacus fullonum), foto di Paolo Cortesi; ala di macaone (Papilio machaon), foto di Paolo Cortesi; geco comune o tarantola (Tarentola mauritanica), foto di Maurizio Bonora; occhio della sfinge del gallio (Macroglossum stellatarum), foto di Nicola Merloni; bruco della farfalla Calliteara pudibonda, foto di Maurizio Bonora; piumaggio di pernice dei bambù cinese (Bambusicola toracica), foto dell’archivio del Museo Civico di Lentate sul Seveso (Monza).
    [Show full text]
  • Asteraceae) and Its Implications to the Taxonomic Position of the Genus Pietrosia
    Phytotaxa 197 (4): 282–290 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.197.4.5 First mature fruit description of Pietrosia laevitomentosa (Asteraceae) and its implications to the taxonomic position of the genus Pietrosia ANCA MANOLE Plant and Animal Cytobiology Department, Institute of Biology Bucharest of the Romanian Academy, 296 Splaiul Independentei, 060031 Bucharest, Romania; email: [email protected] Abstract For the first time we describe the morphology and anatomy of mature achenes bearing fertile seeds of Pietrosia laevito- mentosa, an endemic plant species in the Eastern Carpathians. The new diagnostic features of the genus Pietrosia justify its taxonomic recognition as separate from Andryala; those are the achene size (between 2.5 and 4.3 mm long), the deciduous pappus, the single-rimmed achene apex, the elongate exocarpic cells, the complete ring of mesocarpic sclerenchyma (up to 11-layered), and the number and localization of the vascular bundles (5 bundles, in the small ribs). Furthermore, our data may also serve to reconsider the species ecology and conservation strategies. Key words: carpology, Compositae, conservation, Eastern Carpathians, endangered species, endemism, Romania, sexual propagation Introduction Pietrosia laevitomentosa Nyár. in Sennikov (1999: 78) is still an enigmatic species despite being the subject of active scientific interest after its discovery fifty years ago. It was the only species assigned to the genus Andryala found so far north, as all the other species occur in the Mediterranean Region and Macaronesia (Lucas & Synge 1978). According to published reports, the plant has a very restricted distribution in an area of about 150 square meters on rocky slopes of the Pietrosul Bistriţei Mountain (Eastern Carpathians, Romania).
    [Show full text]
  • The Microlepidopterous Fauna of Sri Lanka, Formerly Ceylon, Is Famous
    ON A COLLECTION OF SOME FAMILIES OF MICRO- LEPIDOPTERA FROM SRI LANKA (CEYLON) by A. DIAKONOFF Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden With 65 text-figures and 18 plates CONTENTS Preface 3 Cochylidae 5 Tortricidae, Olethreutinae, Grapholitini 8 „ „ Eucosmini 23 „ „ Olethreutini 66 „ Chlidanotinae, Chlidanotini 78 „ „ Polyorthini 79 „ „ Hilarographini 81 „ „ Phricanthini 81 „ Tortricinae, Tortricini 83 „ „ Archipini 95 Brachodidae 98 Choreutidae 102 Carposinidae 103 Glyphipterigidae 108 A list of identified species no A list of collecting localities 114 Index of insect names 117 Index of latin plant names 122 PREFACE The microlepidopterous fauna of Sri Lanka, formerly Ceylon, is famous for its richness and variety, due, without doubt, to the diversified biotopes and landscapes of this beautiful island. In spite of this, there does not exist a survey of its fauna — except a single contribution, by Lord Walsingham, in Moore's "Lepidoptera of Ceylon", already almost a hundred years old, and a number of small papers and stray descriptions of new species, in various journals. The authors of these papers were Walker, Zeller, Lord Walsingham and a few other classics — until, starting with 1905, a flood of new descriptions 4 ZOOLOGISCHE VERHANDELINGEN I93 (1982) and records from India and Ceylon appeared, all by the hand of Edward Meyrick. He was almost the single specialist of these faunas, until his death in 1938. To this great Lepidopterist we chiefly owe our knowledge of all groups of Microlepidoptera of Sri Lanka. After his death this information stopped abruptly. In the later years great changes have taken place in the tropical countries. We are now facing, alas, the disastrously quick destruction of natural bio- topes, especially by the reckless liquidation of the tropical forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nota lepidopterologica Jahr/Year: 2006 Band/Volume: 29 Autor(en)/Author(s): Fibiger Michael, Sammut Paul M., Seguna Anthony, Catania Aldo Artikel/Article: Recent records of Noctuidae from Malta, with five species new to the European fauna, and a new subspecies 193-213 ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Notalepid. 29(3/4): 193-213 193 Recent records of Noctuidae from Malta, with five species new to the European fauna, and a new subspecies Michael Fibiger Paul Sammut-, Anthony Seguna \ & Aldo Catania^ ' Molbecha Allé 49, 4180 Sor0, Denmark; e-mail: [email protected] 2 137, 'Fawkner/2\ Dingli Rd., Rabat, RBT 07, Malta; e-mail: [email protected] ^ 'Redeemer', Triq 1-Emigrant, Naxxar, Malta; e-mail: [email protected] ^ 'Rama Rama', Triq Möns. Anton Cilia, Zebbug, Malta; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Recent records of Noctuoidea from Malta are given. Five noctuid species are recorded from Europe for the first time: Eublemma conistrota Hampson, 1910, Eiiblemma deserti Rothschild, 1909, Anumeta hilgerti (Rothschild 1909), Hadiila deserticula (Hampson 1905), and Eiixoa canariensis Rebel, 1902. New synonyms are stated: Leptosia velocissima f. tarda Turati, 1926, syn. n. and Leptosia griseimargo Warren, 1912, syn. n., both synonyms of Metachrostis velox (Hübner, 1813); and Pseudohadena (Eremohadena) roseonitens espugnensis Lajonquiere, 1964, syn. n., a synonym of P. (E.) roseonitens roseonitens (Oberthür, 1887). A new subspecies of Xylena exsoleta (Linneaus, 1758), Xylena exsoleta maltensis ssp. n., is established. The literature on Maltese Noctuoidea is reviewed and erronuousely reported species are indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Leaf-Mining Flies (Diptera, Agromyzidae) of Finland
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 441: 291–303Checklist (2014) of the leaf-mining flies( Diptera, Agromyzidae) of Finland 291 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7586 CHECKLIST www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the leaf-mining flies (Diptera, Agromyzidae) of Finland Jere Kahanpää1 1 Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoology Unit, P.O. Box 17, FI–00014 University of Helsinki, Finland Corresponding author: Jere Kahanpää ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Salmela | Received 25 March 2014 | Accepted 28 April 2014 | Published 19 September 2014 http://zoobank.org/04E1C552-F83F-4611-8166-F6B1A4C98E0E Citation: Kahanpää J (2014) Checklist of the leaf-mining flies (Diptera, Agromyzidae) of Finland. In: Kahanpää J, Salmela J (Eds) Checklist of the Diptera of Finland. ZooKeys 441: 291–303. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7586 Abstract A checklist of the Agromyzidae (Diptera) recorded from Finland is presented. 279 (or 280) species are currently known from the country. Phytomyza linguae Lundqvist, 1947 is recorded as new to Finland. Keywords Checklist, Finland, Diptera, biodiversity, faunistics Introduction The Agromyzidae are called the leaf-miner or leaf-mining flies and not without reason, although a substantial fraction of the species feed as larvae on other parts of living plants. While Agromyzidae is traditionally placed in the superfamily Opomyzoidea, its exact relationships with other acalyptrate Diptera are poorly understood (see for example Winkler et al. 2010). Two subfamilies are recognised within the leaf-mining flies: Agromyzinae and Phytomyzinae. Both are now recognised as natural groups (Dempewolf 2005, Scheffer et al. 2007). Unfortunately the genera are not as well defined: at least Ophiomyia, Phy- toliriomyza and Aulagromyza are paraphyletic in DNA sequence analyses (see Scheffer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Recerca I Territori V12 B (002)(1).Pdf
    Butterfly and moths in l’Empordà and their response to global change Recerca i territori Volume 12 NUMBER 12 / SEPTEMBER 2020 Edition Graphic design Càtedra d’Ecosistemes Litorals Mediterranis Mostra Comunicació Parc Natural del Montgrí, les Illes Medes i el Baix Ter Museu de la Mediterrània Printing Gràfiques Agustí Coordinadors of the volume Constantí Stefanescu, Tristan Lafranchis ISSN: 2013-5939 Dipòsit legal: GI 896-2020 “Recerca i Territori” Collection Coordinator Printed on recycled paper Cyclus print Xavier Quintana With the support of: Summary Foreword ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Xavier Quintana Butterflies of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ................................................................................................................. 11 Tristan Lafranchis Moths of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ............................................................................................................................31 Tristan Lafranchis The dispersion of Lepidoptera in the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ...........................................................51 Tristan Lafranchis Three decades of butterfly monitoring at El Cortalet ...................................................................................69 (Aiguamolls de l’Empordà Natural Park) Constantí Stefanescu Effects of abandonment and restoration in Mediterranean meadows .......................................87
    [Show full text]