DOCSLIB.ORG

The End of Uncia at the Roman Mint

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The End of Uncia at the Roman Mint The end of the Unciae at the Roman mint @profyarrow livyarrow.org ANS 2015.20.2029 ANS 2015.20.2924 ANS 2015.20.2926 Aims o Identify known specimens and new types o Consequences of revised chronology o Patterns in metrology o Prosopography and historical contexts o Connect to broader pattern of small bronzes Watch for… A Working Hypothesis Roman moneyers wanted to be SEEN addressing POPULAR concerns Visible “Creativity” Letter control-marks c. 104-96 BCE Crises associated with Saturninus Social War Number, symbol, letter control-marks ANS 1950.103.39 c. 92-79 BCE Collapse of Cinnan Regime and Sulla’s Dictatorship Sporadic control-marking c. 78-57 BCE Cf. Witschonke, R. "The use of die marks on Roman Republican coinage." RBN 92, no. 67 (2012) 130s Unciae Patterns of Bronze Minting at Rome Uncial Standard 110s Unciae Molinari, C. M. “Rearrangement of the denarius-series in the years of the First Sicilian Slave Revolt, the legacy of Attalus III and the Sardinian rebellion.” Nomismata 8 A last flourishing (2016). (and a few semunciae) Lockyear, K. “Mind the Gap! Roman Republican coin hoards from Italy and Iberia at the end of the second century BC” Numismatic Chronicle (2018). Semuncial Standard 130s Unciae Uncial Standard ANS 2015.20.2029 Molinari, C. M. “Rearrangement of the denarius-series in the years of the First Sicilian Slave Revolt, the legacy of Attalus III and the Sardinian rebellion.” Nomismata 8 (2016). Known Populists? Curiatius Metellus Locking up consuls? Sourcing Grain from Disputing the price grain? Thessaly as Aedile? Rev. of ANS 1941.131.65 Garnsey, Peter D. A. and Rathbone, Dominic W.. “The background to the grain law of Gaius Gracchus.” Journal of Roman Studies 75 (1985). a convenient weight? two photos, one coin Uncial Standard 110s Unciae BnF REP-8252 Lockyear, K. “Mind the Gap! Roman Republican coin hoards from Italy and Iberia at the end of the second century BC” Numismatic Chronicle (2018). Cipius (5) RBW 1113 BnF REP-8252 “I am not asleep for EVERYONE” [wink-wink-nudge-nudge, just for my wife’s lover] Syme, Ronald. "Senators, Tribes and Towns." Historia 13.1 (1964): 105-25. Fonteius (3) BnF REP-11494 RBW 1115 RBW 958 Nerva (1) UNIQUE RBW 1126 ANS 1944.100.599 McCabe Collection Nerva RBW 1126 Philippus (2) “…he often played the demagogue…” More ‘light’ quadrans A Unified College? (6) McCabe Collection Uncial Standard 110s Unciae Uncial Standard A last flourishing (and a few semunciae) Semuncial Standard Lockyear, K. “Mind the Gap! Roman Republican coin hoards from Italy and Iberia at the end of the second century BC” Numismatic Chronicle (2018). Uncial Standard ALL ROMA on uncia A last flourishing (and a few semunciae) ALL oak wreaths accept Herennius Semuncial Standard Three photos, one coin And a lost second specimen Cerco’s crown? RBW 1141 RBW 1167 Unique? ANS 2015.20.2926 ANS 2015.20.2924 Tubulus (44, 3) Herennius (17, 1) Visible “Creativity” Letter control-marks c. 104-96 BCE Crises associated with Saturninus Social War Number, symbol, letter control-marks ANS 1950.103.39 c. 92-79 BCE Collapse of Cinnan Regime and Sulla’s Dictatorship Sporadic control-marking c. 78-57 BCE Cf. Witschonke, R. "The use of die marks on Roman Republican coinage." RBN 92, no. 67 (2012).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2014) ADVANCED)DIVISION) ) Page)1) ROUND)I
    MASSACHUSETTS)CERTAMEN),)2014) ADVANCED)DIVISION) ) Page)1) ROUND)I 1:! TU:!!! What!pair!of!Babylonian!lovers!planned!to!meet!at!the!tomb!of!Ninus,!but!were!thwarted!by!a!lioness?) PYRAMUS)AND)THISBE! B1:!!! What!did!Pyramus!do!when!he!found!Thisbe’s!bloody!veil!and!thought!she!was!dead?! ! ! ! ! KILLED)HIMSELF! B2:!!! What!plant!forever!changed!color!when!it!was!splattered!with!Pyramus’!and!Thisbe’s!blood?! ! ! ! ! MULBERRY) ) ) 2:! TU:! For!the!verb!fallō,)give!the!3rd!person!singular,!perfect,!active!subjunctive.! ) FEFELLERIT! B1:! Give!the!corresponding!form!of!disco.! ) DIDICERIT! B2:! Give!the!corresponding!form!of!fio.! ) FACTUS)(A,UM))SIT) ) ) 3:! TU:! Who!was!the!victorious!general!at!the!battle!of!Pydna!in!168!BC?! ) AEMELIUS)PAULUS! B1:! Who!was!the!son!of!Aemelius!Paulus!that!sacked!Corinth!in!146!BC?! ! ! ! ! SCIPIO)AEMELIANUS) ! B2:! Scipio!Aemelianus!was!adopted!by!which!flamen-dialis,-thus!making!him!part!of!a!more!aristocratic!family?! ) (PUBLIUS)CORNELIUS))SCIPIO)AFRICANUS) ) ) 4:! TU:!! According!to!its!derivation,!an!irascible!person!is!easy!to!put!into!what!kind!of!mood?! ) ANGER/ANGRY! B1:!! Give!the!Latin!verb!and!its!meaning!from!which!the!English!word!“sample”!is!derived.) EMŌ)–)TO)BUY! B2:!! Give!the!Latin!noun!and!its!meaning!from!which!the!English!word!“rush”!is!derived.! ) CAUSA)–)REASON,)CAUSE) ) [SCORE)CHECK]) ) 5:! TU:!!! What!Paduan!prose!author!of!the!Augustan!age!wrote!a!history!of!Rome!in!142!books?) TITUS)LIVIUS/LIVY! B1:!!! What!was!the!Latin!title!of!Livy’s!history?! ) AB)URBE)CONDITA! B2:!!! Which!of!the!following!topics!is!not!covered!in!one!of!the!35!extant!books!of!Ab-Urbe-Condita:!!!
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Roman Measures Page 1 of 6
    Ancient Roman Measures Page 1 of 6 Ancient Rome Table of Measures of Length/Distance Name of Unit (Greek) Digitus Meters 01-Digitus (Daktylos) 1 0.0185 02-Uncia - Polex 1.33 0.0246 03-Duorum Digitorum (Condylos) 2 0.037 04-Palmus (Pala(i)ste) 4 0.074 05-Pes Dimidius (Dihas) 8 0.148 06-Palma Porrecta (Orthodoron) 11 0.2035 07-Palmus Major (Spithame) 12 0.222 08-Pes (Pous) 16 0.296 09-Pugnus (Pygme) 18 0.333 10-Palmipes (Pygon) 20 0.370 11-Cubitus - Ulna (pechus) 24 0.444 12-Gradus – Pes Sestertius (bema aploun) 40 0.74 13-Passus (bema diploun) 80 1.48 14-Ulna Extenda (Orguia) 96 1.776 15-Acnua -Dekempeda - Pertica (Akaina) 160 2.96 16-Actus 1920 35.52 17-Actus Stadium 10000 185 18-Stadium (Stadion Attic) 10000 185 19-Milliarium - Mille passuum 80000 1480 20-Leuka - Leuga 120000 2220 http://www.anistor.gr/history/diophant.html Ancient Roman Measures Page 2 of 6 Table of Measures of Area Name of Unit Pes Quadratus Meters2 01-Pes Quadratus 1 0.0876 02-Dimidium scrupulum 50 4.38 03-Scripulum - scrupulum 100 8.76 04-Actus minimus 480 42.048 05-Uncia 2400 210.24 06-Clima 3600 315.36 07-Sextans 4800 420.48 08-Actus quadratus 14400 1261.44 09-Arvum - Arura 22500 1971 10-Jugerum 28800 2522.88 11-Heredium 57600 5045.76 12-Centuria 5760000 504576 13-Saltus 23040000 2018304 http://www.anistor.gr/history/diophant.html Ancient Roman Measures Page 3 of 6 Table of Measures of Liquids Name of Unit Ligula Liters 01-Ligula 1 0.0114 02-Uncia (metric) 2 0.0228 03-Cyathus 4 0.0456 04-Acetabulum 6 0.0684 05-Sextans 8 0.0912 06-Quartarius – Quadrans 12 0.1368
    [Show full text]
  • 3927 25.90 Brass 6 Obols / Sestertius 3928 24.91
    91 / 140 THE COINAGE SYSTEM OF CLEOPATRA VII, MARC ANTONY AND AUGUSTUS IN CYPRUS 3927 25.90 brass 6 obols / sestertius 3928 24.91 brass 6 obols / sestertius 3929 14.15 brass 3 obols / dupondius 3930 16.23 brass same (2 examples weighed) 3931 6.72 obol / 2/3 as (3 examples weighed) 3932 9.78 3/2 obol / as *Not struck at a Cypriot mint. 92 / 140 THE COINAGE SYSTEM OF CLEOPATRA VII, MARC ANTONY AND AUGUSTUS IN CYPRUS Cypriot Coinage under Tiberius and Later, After 14 AD To the people of Cyprus, far from the frontiers of the Empire, the centuries of the Pax Romana formed an uneventful although contented period. Mattingly notes, “Cyprus . lay just outside of the main currents of life.” A population unused to political independence or democratic institutions did not find Roman rule oppressive. Radiate Divus Augustus and laureate Tiberius on c. 15.6g Cypriot dupondius - triobol. In c. 15-16 AD the laureate head of Tiberius was paired with Livia seated right (RPC 3919, as) and paired with that of Divus Augustus (RPC 3917 and 3918 dupondii). Both types are copied from Roman Imperial types of the early reign of Tiberius. For his son Drusus, hemiobols were struck with the reverse designs begun by late in the reign of Cleopatra: Zeus Salaminios and the Temple of Aphrodite at Paphos. In addition, a reverse with both of these symbols was struck. Drusus obverse was paired with either Zeus Salaminios, or Temple of Aphrodite reverses, as well as this reverse that shows both. (4.19g) Conical black stone found in 1888 near the ruins of the temple of Aphrodite at Paphos, now in the Museum of Kouklia.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Coins Elementary Manual
    ^1 If5*« ^IP _\i * K -- ' t| Wk '^ ^. 1 Digitized by Google Digitized by Google Digitized by Google Digitized by Google Digitized by Google Digitized by Google PROTAT BROTHERS, PRINTBRS, MACON (PRANCi) Digitized by Google ROMAN COINS ELEMENTARY MANUAL COMPILED BY CAV. FRANCESCO gNECCHI VICE-PRBSIDENT OF THE ITALIAN NUMISMATIC SOaETT, HONORARY MEMBER OF THE LONDON, BELGIAN AND SWISS NUMISMATIC SOCIBTIES. 2"^ EDITION RKVISRD, CORRECTED AND AMPLIFIED Translated by the Rev<> Alfred Watson HANDS MEMBF,R OP THE LONDON NUMISMATIC SOCIETT LONDON SPINK & SON 17 & l8 PICCADILLY W. — I & 2 GRACECHURCH ST. B.C. 1903 (ALL RIGHTS RF^ERVED) Digitized by Google Arc //-/7^. K.^ Digitized by Google ROMAN COINS ELEMENTARY MANUAL AUTHOR S PREFACE TO THE ENGLISH EDITION In the month of July 1898 the Rev. A. W. Hands, with whom I had become acquainted through our common interests and stud- ieSy wrote to me asking whether it would be agreeable to me and reasonable to translate and publish in English my little manual of the Roman Coinage, and most kindly offering to assist me, if my knowledge of the English language was not sufficient. Feeling honoured by the request, and happy indeed to give any assistance I could in rendering this science popular in other coun- tries as well as my own, I suggested that it would he probably less trouble ii he would undertake the translation himselt; and it was with much pleasure and thankfulness that I found this proposal was accepted. It happened that the first edition of my Manual was then nearly exhausted, and by waiting a short time I should be able to offer to the English reader the translation of the second edition, which was being rapidly prepared with additions and improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • GREEK and ROMAN COINS GREEK COINS Technique Ancient Greek
    GREEK AND ROMAN COINS GREEK COINS Technique Ancient Greek coins were struck from blank pieces of metal first prepared by heating and casting in molds of suitable size. At the same time, the weight was adjusted. Next, the blanks were stamped with devices which had been prepared on the dies. The lower die, for the obverse, was fixed in the anvil; the reverse was attached to a punch. The metal blank, heated to soften it, was placed on the anvil and struck with the punch, thus producing a design on both sides of the blank. Weights and Values The values of Greek coins were strictly related to the weights of the coins, since the coins were struck in intrinsically valuable metals. All Greek coins were issued according to the particular weight system adopted by the issuing city-state. Each system was based on the weight of the principal coin; the weights of all other coins of that system were multiples or sub-divisions of this major denomination. There were a number of weight standards in use in the Greek world, but the basic unit of weight was the drachm (handful) which was divided into six obols (spits). The drachm, however, varied in weight. At Aigina it weighed over six grammes, at Corinth less than three. In the 6th century B.C. many cities used the standard of the island of Aegina. In the 5th century, however, the Attic standard, based on the Athenian tetradrachm of 17 grammes, prevailed in many areas of Greece, and this was the system adopted in the 4th century by Alexander the Great.
    [Show full text]
  • Nummi Serrati, Bigati Et Alii. Coins of the Roman Republic in East-Central Europe North of the Sudetes and the Carpathians
    Chapter 2 Outline history of Roman Republican coinage The study of the history of the coinage of the Roman state, including that of the Republican Period, has a history going back several centuries. In the past two hundred years in particular there has been an impressive corpus of relevant literature, such as coin catalogues and a wide range of analytical-descriptive studies. Of these the volume essential in the study of Roman Republican coinage defi nitely continues to be the catalogue provided with an extensive commentary written by Michael H. Crawford over forty years ago.18 Admittedly, some arguments presented therein, such as the dating proposed for particular issues, have met with valid criticism,19 but for the study of Republican coin fi nds from northern territories, substantially removed from the Mediterranean world, this is a minor matter. In the study of coin fi nds recovered in our study area from pre-Roman and Roman period prehistoric contexts, we have very few, and usually quite vague, references to an absolute chronology (i.e. the age determined in years of the Common Era) therefore doubts as to the very precise dating of some of the coin issues are the least of our problems. This is especially the case when these doubts are raised mostly with respect to the older coins of the series. These types seem to have entered the territory to the north of the Sudetes and the Carpathians a few score, and in some cases, even over a hundred, years after their date of minting. It is quite important on the other hand to be consistent in our use of the chronological fi ndings related to the Roman Republican coinage, in our case, those of M.
    [Show full text]
  • Literary Evidence for Roman Arithmetic with Fractions
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Classical Studies: Faculty Publications and Other Works Faculty Publications 10-2001 Literary Evidence for Roman Arithmetic with Fractions David W. Maher John F. Makowski Loyola University Chicago, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/classicalstudies_facpubs Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Maher, DW, and Makowski, JF. "Literary evidence for Roman arithmetic with fractions" in Classical Philology 96(4), 2001. 376-399. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classical Studies: Faculty Publications and Other Works by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. © University of Chicago Press, 2001. LITERARY EVIDENCE FOR ROMAN ARITHMETIC WITH FRACTIONS DAVID W. MAHER AND JOHN F. MAKOWSKI R OMAN ARITHMETIC IS A PERENNIALLY TROUBLING subject for both classicists and mathematicians.Scholars universally comment on the difficulty posed by Roman alphabetical notation both in expres- sing simple figures and in doing written calculations. For example, Lloyd Motz and Jefferson Weaver with exasperation ask, "How ... can anyone do any arithmetic with DCCCLXXXVIII, the Roman equivalent of 888?," and Florian Cajori concludes that the Romans must have resorted to the abacus in order to multiply a number like 723 (DCCXXIII) by 364 (CCCLXIV).' Yet our sources, literary and inscriptional, indicate that the Romans were capable of highly sophisticated calculations, and, of course, it is well rec- ognized that they had great facility with the abacus and with finger reck- oning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Empire Strikes: the Growth of Roman Infrastructural Minting Power, 60 B.C
    The Empire Strikes: The Growth of Roman Infrastructural Minting Power, 60 B.C. – A.D. 68 A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Classics of the College of Arts and Sciences by David Schwei M.A., University of Cincinnati, December 2012 B.A., Emory University, May 2009 Committee Chairs: Peter van Minnen, Ph.D Barbara Burrell, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Coins permeated the Roman Empire, and they offer a unique perspective into the ability of the Roman state to implement its decisions in Italy and the provinces. This dissertation examines how this ability changed and grew over time, between 60 B.C. and A.D. 68, as seen through coin production. Earlier scholars assumed that the mint at Rome always produced coinage for the entire empire, or they have focused on a sudden change under Augustus. Recent advances in catalogs, documentation of coin hoards, and metallurgical analyses allow a fuller picture to be painted. This dissertation integrates the previously overlooked coinages of Asia Minor, Syria, and Egypt with the denarius of the Latin West. In order to measure the development of the Roman state’s infrastructural power, this dissertation combines the anthropological ideal types of hegemonic and territorial empires with the numismatic method of detecting coordinated activity at multiple mints. The Roman state exercised its power over various regions to different extents, and it used its power differently over time. During the Republic, the Roman state had low infrastructural minting capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Coin Reference Guide
    Ancient Coin Reference Guide Part One Compiled by Ron Rutkowsky When I first began collecting ancient coins I started to put together a guide which would help me to identify them and to learn more about their history. Over the years this has developed into several notebooks filled with what I felt would be useful information. My plan now is to make all this information available to other collectors of ancient coinage. I cannot claim any credit for this information; it has all come from many sources including the internet. Throughout this reference I use the old era terms of BC (Before Christ) and AD (Anno Domni, year of our Lord) rather than the more politically correct BCE (Before the Christian era) and CE (Christian era). Rome With most collections, there must be a starting point. Mine was with Roman coinage. The history of Rome is a subject that we all learned about in school. From Julius Caesar, Marc Anthony, to Constantine the Great and the fall of the empire in the late 5th century AD. Rome first came into being around the year 753 BC, when it was ruled under noble families that descended from the Etruscans. During those early days, it was ruled by kings. Later the Republic ruled by a Senate headed by a Consul whose term of office was one year replaced the kingdom. The Senate lasted until Julius Caesar took over as a dictator in 47 BC and was murdered on March 15, 44 BC. I will skip over the years until 27 BC when Octavian (Augustus) ended the Republic and the Roman Empire was formed making him the first emperor.
    [Show full text]
  • Variarum I.X of Cassiodorus As a Program of Monetary Policy
    FLORILEGIUM 9, 1987 VARIARUM I.X OF CASSIODORUS AS A PROGRAM OF MONETARY POLICY Luciana Cuppo Csaki Magnus Aurelius Cassiodorus Senator does not, by and large, enjoy a good reputation among scholars. “Epistulae . admirationem movent exilitate sua et vaniloquentia” : this is what Theodor Mommsen1 wrote about the Variae, and his ghost still looms on the scholarly horizon.2 Further com­ ments by Mommsen: “Sylloge Cassiodorana Variarum Libri XII . quod nullum verbum habet, quo aut Germani offendantur aut Iustinianus, inge- nium auctoris testatur et pavidum et callidum et ita umbratile, ut ne ii quidam laudare queant qui imitantur.”3 These words, published in 1894, set the tone for much of subsequent scholarship. Var. I.X is no exception; if considered at all by scholars, this letter has been seen as a response to complaints by allegedly underpaid guards, or as a proof for certain features of the Western Byzantine monetary system.4 Actually, it is far more than that. Var. I.X, written in the name of Theoderic and addressed to “Boethio v. i. atque patricio,” is occasioned by a complaint presented jointly by the palace excubitors to the king (“adunata nobis supplicatione conquesti sunt,” I.X.10): allegedly, the guards were being paid in solidi of substandard weight (“nec integri ponderis,” I.X. 11) by the praefectus arcae. Theoderic called upon Boethius to investigate the matter and ascertain the truth, so as to 53 54 FLORILEGIUM 9, 1987 make sure that the proper weight of the solidi be maintained. We do not know why Boethius was put in charge of the investigation or how the re­ duction in weight of the solidi was achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • AES EXCURRENS and the ABACUS* in the Text Distributio Partium (DP) by Lucius Volusius Maecianus (Mae- Cianus, for Short)1, Which
    AESEXCURRENS AND THE ABACUS* Abstract: This paper seeks to shed some new light on the function of the abacus (counting board) as an instrument for financial computa- tions in Roman times. The likely layout of the abacus is presented for the Roman monetary notations for aesexcurrens (small change) in the as-, sestertius- and denarius-based accounting systems mentioned in L. Volusius Maecianus’ Distributio Partium. It is shown that the Roman abacus possessed the flexibility needed for handling both the common Roman duodecimal fractions and the less common decimal fractions, i.e. the libella and its subdivisions. In turn, the very design of the abacus seems to have driven the later Roman notations for small change. INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES, ORGANISATION In the text DistributioPartium (DP) by Lucius Volusius Maecianus (Mae- cianus, for short)1, which is one of the few primary sources for Roman metrology, reference is made to the different notations that the Romans supposedly used to record sums of money. Monetary amounts were regis- tered in terms of multiples and fractions of the accounting units in use: at the time a clear distinction was made between as-, sestertius- and denarius- based monetary notations and types of accounting, known as the ratio aeraria, ratiosestertiaria (or ratioadsestertium) and ratiodenariaria (or * The author wishes to express his gratitude to Prof. Dr. S. Cuomo, Department of History, Classics and Archaeology, Birkbeck College, University of London, U.K., to Prof. Dr. J.P. Hogendijk, Mathematical Institute, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands and to Dr. F.A.J. Hoogendijk, Papyrological Institute, Leiden University, The Netherlands, for reading early drafts of this paper and their valuable suggestions for improvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Currencies of the Classical World
    Currencies of the Classical World © MoneyMuseum The list of currencies represented at the MoneyMuseum doesn’t quite reach from A to Z, but almost from antoninianus to uncia. The coins of the Roman emperor Antoninus Augustus are only museum pieces now, but the uncia is still with us, as the ounce, which is now being replaced by new metric units in Britain, but is alive and kicking in the United States. Nowadays, though, it isn’t a currency any more, only a unit of weight. But there are other currencies that have definitely died out, whose very names sound exotic, such as the hecte or the obol. Two currencies from ancient times have survived into our own day, the Hebrew shekel and the Greek drachm – although the curtain came down on the drachm in February 2002 ... 1 von 25 www.sunflower.ch Antoninianus How such coins were called in Roman times, we do not know. Since the middle ages, they are identified as antoniniani, after the name of the emperor who introduced them: Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, better known as Caracalla. The distinctive mark of the antoniniani is the aureole of the emperor and the crescent of the empress respectively. The coins were introduced in 214 AD supposedly as double denarii with acceptable silver content, yet at a weight of only 1.5 denarii. However, the silver content of the antoniniani sunk rapidly, so that forty years later, antoniniani were mere copper coins with a thin layer of silver. The reason for this was a coinage devaluation that had already set in during the reign of Caracalla's father, Emperor Septimius Severus (193-211).
    [Show full text]