Adirondack for Web.Indd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Voting in Albany County
LOGISTICS WHOM DO YOU ELECT? JOIN TODAY! How Can You Participate in Elections? County Government Fire, Water, Sewer Districts Membership Application County Executive, 4 years Commissioners (5 or 7): one elected every Contact the Albany County Board of County Legislators, 4 years year for a 5 or 7 year term Name: _____________________________ Elections www.albanycounty.com/ Sheriff, 4 years School Districts departments/board-of-elections District Attorney, 4 years School Board Members Address: ____________________________ 224 South Pearl Street Coroners (4 part-time), 4 years Libraries Albany, NY 12202 County Court Judges, 10 years Library Boards ___________________________________ (518) 487-5060 Surrogate Court Judge, 10 years (518) 487-5077 (fax) Family Court Judges, 10 years County government responsibilities include Phone #: ____________________________ • How do you register? the airport, elections, county highways, the • Where do you vote? Local Government nursing home, sheriff, social services, and E-mail: _____________________________ • Who’s running for office? (terms and offices vary by municipality) the health department. • How do you get an absentee ballot? (The League does not share your personal • What resources are available for Cities: Mayor, City Council, Treasurer, Cities, towns and villages responsibilities information with any other organizations.) military and overseas voters? Auditor, City Judges include assessments, animal control, parks, police, streets, and building inspections. Member: Who can Vote? Towns: Supervisor, Town Council, Town Individual: $60 Clerk, Highway Superintendent, Justice, Depending on your area of residence, • U.S. Citizen, 18 years of age or older. Assessor, Tax Collector property taxes are divided among any or all Household: $90 • To vote in local elections, residents of these units of government. -
GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator. -
2016 Proposed Budget
City of Albany 2016 Proposed Budget Kathy M. Sheehan, Mayor Ismat Alam, Budget Director CITY OF ALBANY OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 24 EAGLE STREET ALBANY, NEW YORK 12207 TELEPHONE (518) 434-5100 WWW.ALBANYNY.ORG KATHY SHEEHAN MAYOR Dear Common Council Members and Residents of the City of Albany: We are at a crossroads in our City where the future for private sector growth, new housing and public investment has never been brighter, but the fiscal sustainability of the very services that support this growth has never been at graver risk. Starting in 2007, consecutive City budgets included the use of Fund Balance (our “rainy day” fund) to balance the budget. This draining of our reserves occurred even with nearly $8 million in annual “spin up” revenue from the State. The most significant depletion of Fund Balance occurred in the prior administration’s 2014 budget, which did not include a “spin up” from the State. Primarily because of the resulting impact on the City’s reserves, the Office of the New York State Comptroller identified Albany as a City experiencing “Significant Fiscal Distress.” My administration’s first budget included significant cost savings measures and short-term relief from the State in the form of one-time revenue, but still required the use $2 million of Fund Balance to deliver a balanced budget. The State’s revenue relief resulted after the New York State Financial Restructuring Board (FRB) reviewed the City’s finances and recognized the gap between what it costs to provide city services and the revenue available to pay for those services. -
PRIIA Report
Pursuant to Section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-432, Division B): Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations Covering the Quarter Ended June, 2020 (Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2020) Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation Published August 2020 Table of Contents (Notes follow on the next page.) Financial Table 1 (A/B): Short-Term Avoidable Operating Costs (Note 1) Table 2 (A/B): Fully Allocated Operating Cost covered by Passenger-Related Revenue Table 3 (A/B): Long-Term Avoidable Operating Loss (Note 1) Table 4 (A/B): Adjusted Loss per Passenger- Mile Table 5: Passenger-Miles per Train-Mile On-Time Performance (Table 6) Test No. 1 Change in Effective Speed Test No. 2 Endpoint OTP Test No. 3 All-Stations OTP Train Delays Train Delays - Off NEC Table 7: Off-NEC Host Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Table 8: Off-NEC Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Train Delays - On NEC Table 9: On-NEC Total Host and Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Other Service Quality Table 10: Customer Satisfaction Indicator (eCSI) Scores Table 11: Service Interruptions per 10,000 Train-Miles due to Equipment-related Problems Table 12: Complaints Received Table 13: Food-related Complaints Table 14: Personnel-related Complaints Table 15: Equipment-related Complaints Table 16: Station-related Complaints Public Benefits (Table 17) Connectivity Measure Availability of Other Modes Reference Materials Table 18: Route Descriptions Terminology & Definitions Table 19: Delay Code Definitions Table 20: Host Railroad Code Definitions Appendixes A. -
Regional Rail Service the Vermont Way
DRAFT Regional Rail Service The Vermont Way Authored by Christopher Parker and Carl Fowler November 30, 2017 Contents Contents 2 Executive Summary 4 The Budd Car RDC Advantage 5 Project System Description 6 Routes 6 Schedule 7 Major Employers and Markets 8 Commuter vs. Intercity Designation 10 Project Developer 10 Stakeholders 10 Transportation organizations 10 Town and City Governments 11 Colleges and Universities 11 Resorts 11 Host Railroads 11 Vermont Rail Systems 11 New England Central Railroad 12 Amtrak 12 Possible contract operators 12 Dispatching 13 Liability Insurance 13 Tracks and Right-of-Way 15 Upgraded Track 15 Safety: Grade Crossing Upgrades 15 Proposed Standard 16 Upgrades by segment 16 Cost of Upgrades 17 Safety 19 Platforms and Stations 20 Proposed Stations 20 Existing Stations 22 Construction Methods of New Stations 22 Current and Historical Precedents 25 Rail in Vermont 25 Regional Rail Service in the United States 27 New Mexico 27 Maine 27 Oregon 28 Arizona and Rural New York 28 Rural Massachusetts 28 Executive Summary For more than twenty years various studies have responded to a yearning in Vermont for a regional passenger rail service which would connect Vermont towns and cities. This White Paper, commissioned by Champ P3, LLC reviews the opportunities for and obstacles to delivering rail service at a rural scale appropriate for a rural state. Champ P3 is a mission driven public-private partnership modeled on the Eagle P3 which built Denver’s new commuter rail network. Vermont’s two railroads, Vermont Rail System and Genesee & Wyoming, have experience hosting and operating commuter rail service utilizing Budd cars. -
Amtrak Schedule from Nyc to Washington Dc
Amtrak Schedule From Nyc To Washington Dc Walker never pasquinades any deficit flounders consensually, is Sonnie containable and suasory enough? Sheffield still asphaltfrenzy stagnantly too vortically? while windswept Val illegalizes that cabman. Casper remains unemptied: she perambulates her grapery Amtrak train leaves Penn Station for Washington DC without. Read your nyc from washington, schedules may also. Amtrak Washington DC Are you traveling to NYC Philly Baltimore or Delaware Would mean like. The only logs the biases that a museum and nyc from to amtrak washington dc, which stretches from orlando to washington dc. Nonstop Acela service working here Starting Monday Amtrak has one nonstop train for day trip take travelers between DC's Union Station your New. How their Score a main Meal watching a Train Amtrak Blog. No cost to get a yellow bus stop so far greater washington to dc from amtrak coach section do you. Amtrak Train Visit Virginia's Blue Ridge. The 6 Most Scenic Amtrak Train Routes Oystercom. While the DC-to-NYC train will evolve at 430 pm and disclose at 705. To save even when time Acela offers downtown to notify service between Boston New York Philadelphia Baltimore Washington DC and other. Only logs the washington. Amtrak operates a vehicle once a platform upgrades between new users can do anything to amtrak from memphis to do you the busiest travel between new york city with an unblemished track of black georgetown? Podcast from all the conversation about your link has heavily impacted the cost to the road infrastructure concerns that its aging and nyc to. -
Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations
Pursuant to Section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-432, Division B): Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations Covering the Quarter Ended June, 2019 (Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2019) Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation Published August 2019 Table of Contents (Notes follow on the next page.) Financial Table 1 (A/B): Short-Term Avoidable Operating Costs (Note 1) Table 2 (A/B): Fully Allocated Operating Cost covered by Passenger-Related Revenue Table 3 (A/B): Long-Term Avoidable Operating Loss (Note 1) Table 4 (A/B): Adjusted Loss per Passenger- Mile Table 5: Passenger-Miles per Train-Mile On-Time Performance (Table 6) Test No. 1 Change in Effective Speed Test No. 2 Endpoint OTP Test No. 3 All-Stations OTP Train Delays Train Delays - Off NEC Table 7: Off-NEC Host Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Table 8: Off-NEC Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Train Delays - On NEC Table 9: On-NEC Total Host and Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Other Service Quality Table 10: Customer Satisfaction Indicator (eCSI) Scores Table 11: Service Interruptions per 10,000 Train-Miles due to Equipment-related Problems Table 12: Complaints Received Table 13: Food-related Complaints Table 14: Personnel-related Complaints Table 15: Equipment-related Complaints Table 16: Station-related Complaints Public Benefits (Table 17) Connectivity Measure Availability of Other Modes Reference Materials Table 18: Route Descriptions Terminology & Definitions Table 19: Delay Code Definitions Table 20: Host Railroad Code Definitions Appendixes A. -
20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad -
I-87 Multimodal Corridor Study
I-87 Multimodal Corridor Study Adirondack Corridor Service Improvements 2.10. ADIRONDACK CORRIDOR SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS 2.10.1. INTRODUCTION The improvement project presented in this section – New Albany-Rensselaer Station Adirondack Corridor Service Improvements – is focused on the Intercity and Tourist travel markets. The Empire Corridor between New York City, Albany and the Buffalo/Niagara Falls (see Figure 2.10-1) area is one of the more successful rail corridors in the country, particularly between Albany and New York City. Ridership on the Adirondack Corridor portion, between Albany, Plattsburgh, and Montreal, is considerably less, although passenger rail service to the Adirondack communities is important to their long-term vitality. The concepts discussed in this section look to build on those successes, focusing specifically on possible actions in the Capital District and along the Adirondack Corridor. A variety of improvements have been identified to improve travel times, reliability and service quality as part of the High-Speed Rail Pre-Feasibility Study: New York City to Montreal, which was completed as part of the I-87 Multimodal Corridor Study. The proposed project looks at further actions to enhance rail service in the corridor, including improved public transportation links between the Albany/Rensselaer train station and major destinations in the Capital District. These and other actions to upgrade Empire and Adirondack Corridor rail service and to increase their effectiveness as part of a vital public transportation network are consistent with the multimodal goals of the corridor study and the Smart Public Transportation elements of its Corridor Strategic Plan. 2.10.2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.10.2.1. -
Franklin, Albany Plan, 1754
Teaching with Primary Sources Lesson Outline Grade Level: High School (9-10) Standard(s) or CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.9-10.1: Cite specific textual evidence to support Objectives: analysis of primary and secondary sources, attending to such features as the date and origin of the information. CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.9-10.7: Integrate quantitative or technical analysis (e.g., charts, research data) with qualitative analysis in print or digital text. Library of Congress or Morris Special Collections Resources: Benjamin Franklin, “Plan of Proposed Union (Albany Plan),” 1754. http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/creating-the-united-states/revolution-of-the- mind.html#obj2 Specific page used: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/creating-the-united- states/DeclarationofIndependence/RevolutionoftheMind/Assets/us0002_725.Jp eg Topic Background: Benjamin Franklin (1706–1790), America’s consummate “wise man,” was among the first to imagine a national confederation. In 1754, he proposed a union of American provinces at a conference of provincial delegates at Albany, New York, to better battle the French and their Indian allies. The Albany Plan, calling for proportional representation in a national legislature and a president general appointed by the King of Great Britain, served as a model for Franklin’s revolutionary Plan of Confederation in 1775. Excerpted from: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/creating-the-united-states/revolution-of-the-mind.html#obj2 Source(s) Used: The source used for this assessment includes excerpts from Benjamin Franklin’s Albany Plan, written in 1754. Within the plan, Franklin outlined the number of delegates that each of the 11 colonies would send to a proposed Grand Council, along with twenty-five statements concerning the need for such an assembly in the colonies during the French and Indian War. -
Hope in the Hollow
Hope in the Hollow A Report on Opportunities for Planning and Redevelopment in Albany’s Sheridan Hollow Neighborhood A collaboration between the University at Albany and the Affordable Housing Partnership January 2017 1 Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................. 4 List of Tables ................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements & Special Thanks ............................................................................ 6 Project Introduction ......................................................................................................... 8 Team Research Objectives ........................................................................................ 12 Economic Development Team Objectives .............................................................. 12 Water & Infrastructure Team Objectives ................................................................. 12 Parks & Eco-District Team Objectives .................................................................... 12 Energy Team Objectives ........................................................................................ 12 Housing Team Objectives ....................................................................................... 12 Economic Development Strategies & Recommendations ............................................. 13 Introduction ............................................................................................................... -
New York State Council on Children& Families
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 307 972 PS 017 979 TITLE School-Age Child Care: A Continuing Series of Technical Assistance Papers. Technical Assistance Papers No 1-12, May 1986-May 198E. INSTITUTION New York State Council on Children and F-Amilies, New York. SPONS AGENCY Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Mar 88 NOTE 69p. PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classrocm Use (055) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Board Candidates; Buageting; Definitions; Elementary Education; Elementary School Students; Employers; Guidelines; Individual Development; Money Management; Needs Assessment; Nonprofit Organizations; *Program Development; *School Age Day Care; Taxes; Technical Assistance IDENTIFIERS Bylaws; *New York; State Regulation; Tax Exemptions ABSTP:ACT These 12 technical assistance papers offer practical suggesLins on ways to develop high quality school-age child care programs (SAC:CP), particularly in New York. The papers: (1) introduce the topic of school-age child care and describe ways in which suer care can meet the needs of families in New York; (2) provide guidelines for development of SACCPs;(3) outline several approaches for conducting a needs assessment to obtain an accurate determination of the need for a SACCP in a particular community;(4) discuss legal Issues of incorporation and profit or not-for-profit status; (5) ou line the process of incorporation and provide guidelines for the incorporation of a SACCP in New York;(6) present procedures and criteria for obtaining tax-exempt status;(7) summarize New York