DOCSLIB.ORG

I-87 Multimodal Corridor Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I-87 Multimodal Corridor Study I-87 Multimodal Corridor Study Adirondack Corridor Service Improvements 2.10. ADIRONDACK CORRIDOR SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS 2.10.1. INTRODUCTION The improvement project presented in this section – New Albany-Rensselaer Station Adirondack Corridor Service Improvements – is focused on the Intercity and Tourist travel markets. The Empire Corridor between New York City, Albany and the Buffalo/Niagara Falls (see Figure 2.10-1) area is one of the more successful rail corridors in the country, particularly between Albany and New York City. Ridership on the Adirondack Corridor portion, between Albany, Plattsburgh, and Montreal, is considerably less, although passenger rail service to the Adirondack communities is important to their long-term vitality. The concepts discussed in this section look to build on those successes, focusing specifically on possible actions in the Capital District and along the Adirondack Corridor. A variety of improvements have been identified to improve travel times, reliability and service quality as part of the High-Speed Rail Pre-Feasibility Study: New York City to Montreal, which was completed as part of the I-87 Multimodal Corridor Study. The proposed project looks at further actions to enhance rail service in the corridor, including improved public transportation links between the Albany/Rensselaer train station and major destinations in the Capital District. These and other actions to upgrade Empire and Adirondack Corridor rail service and to increase their effectiveness as part of a vital public transportation network are consistent with the multimodal goals of the corridor study and the Smart Public Transportation elements of its Corridor Strategic Plan. 2.10.2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.10.2.1. Empire and Adirondack Corridor Intercity Rail Service Although the Capital District is presently served by both the Adirondack and Empire Amtrak services, upgrades to both of these services is necessary to enhance passenger rail service in the region and along the I-87 corridor as a whole. Adirondack Service between Albany and Montreal, with stops at Schenectady, Saratoga Springs, and various points within the Adirondack region, consists of only one train per day in each direction, and the travel time is more than seven hours. Although the Empire Corridor between New York City and Albany is one of Amtrak’s more successful rail lines, it does not serve the growing market for trips to and from residential and employment centers in Saratoga County. Service improvements to these rail corridors, as well as the potential to expand passenger rail service beyond what currently exists, is limited by the present condition of Canadian Pacific (CP) Railway Canadian Main Line infrastructure between Schenectady and Rouses Point. The efficiency and reliability of both the track and signaling systems must be upgraded, new or extended sidings are needed in several locations, and a bypass of the Saratoga Springs Yard would be required to extend Empire Corridor service north to the recently reconstructed Saratoga Springs Station. Several improvements to rail infrastructure in the corridor are already programmed or have been proposed as part of other initiatives. These include the following: Parsons-Clough Harbour Page 2.10-1 I-87 Multimodal Corridor Study Adirondack Corridor Service Improvements FIGURE 2.10-1 AMTRAK SERVICE IN NEW YORK STATE Parsons-Clough Harbour I-87 Multimodal Corridor Study Adirondack Corridor Service Improvements • High Speed Rail Pre-Feasibility Study Maintenance Upgrade. In the I-87 Multi- Modal Corridor Study’s High-Speed Rail Pre-Feasibility Study, a broad range of improvement scenarios were tested to assess their effectiveness in increasing operating speeds and reliability and reducing travel time between Schenectady and Rouses Point. Similar improvements to the rail segment between Rouses Point and Montreal were simultaneously studied by the Ministry of Transportation Quebec (MTQ). Both studies concluded that a series of relatively modest improvements could significantly reduce travel times between Albany and Montreal. The “Maintenance Upgrade” alternatives identified for various areas between Albany and Rouses Point would produce time savings of 45 minutes, compared with the present schedule. The estimated capital cost for these improvements, which are summarized in Table 2.10-1, would be approximately $20 million. Combined with similar improvements within Quebec, travel time between Albany and Montreal could be cut by 3 hours. • CSX Double-Tracking. NYSDOT and Amtrak have long-standing plans to double-track the 18-mile CSX Hudson Subdivision between Albany-Rensselaer and Schenectady, a mostly single-track route that is presently used by 12 Amtrak trains per weekday (six in each direction) as part of Amtrak’s Empire Service, as well as by the Adirondack Corridor service and Ethan Allen service to Vermont. One critical infrastructure element, the Albany-Rensselaer railroad bridge (Livingston Avenue Movable Bridge), is already double-track, but in need of signalization and significant rehabilitation work. Final design engineering for this bridge work remains to be done. Table 2.10-1 – Proposed Improvements to Reduce Trip Time on Canadian Pacific Railway Canadian Main Line between Ballston Spa and Rouses Point Start End Total Estimated Proposed Improvement Mile Mile Estimated Cost Length Total Cost Post Post (miles) 38.0 41.0 $2,400,000 43.0 50.0 $5,600,000 Replace Jointed Rail with 118.9 119.0 $200,000 12.2 $10,000,000 Continuous Welded Rail 119.0 120.0 $800,000 120.0 121.0 $800,000 134.3 134.4 $200,000 Construct New Passing TBD TBD $3,000,000 TBD $3,000,000 Siding Tie Replacement / Track Surfacing / Curve 142.0 192.0 $6,000,000 50.0 $6,000,000 Realignment Bridge Replacement 29.5 29.6 $1,000,000 0.1 $1,000,000 Total Estimated Cost of Improvements $20,000,000 TBD = To be determined • Canadian Pacific Railway Capital Improvements. The primary focus of CP’s capital programs in the foreseeable future is three-fold: Parsons-Clough Harbour Page 2.10-2 I-87 Multimodal Corridor Study Adirondack Corridor Service Improvements • To correct temporary slow-order conditions; • To maintain the existing capabilities of infrastructure between Schenectady and Rouses Point in terms of track capacity and Maximum Authorized Speed (MAS) for freight and passenger train service; and • To improve the efficiency and reliability of the signaling system and track structure. These improvements will add considerably to the overall dependability of service, both freight and passenger. NYSDOT is assisting in the funding of this effort. The Canadian Main Line track structure has nearly 50 percent jointed rail, which is necessarily more expensive to maintain than continuously welded rail (CWR) because track surfacing is required more frequently, with greater wear and tear to crossties and ballast due to the forces exerted at the bolted joints between rail sections. Subgrade and stabilization work on various track sections in the 2004 work season are expected to improve signal system and service reliability. These improvements were previously scheduled and are not part of the $20 million in proposed improvements identified in the High-Speed Rail Pre-Feasibility Study. The freight traffic volume on the Canadian Main Line is comparatively small by U.S. mainline railroad standards. Therefore, CP plans on gradually installing CWR where economically justifiable on the Canadian Main, such as locations where jointed rail must be replaced. Installation of CWR helps reduce maintenance of way and signal operating expenses, while improving service reliability by reducing signal system failures that require trains to operate at restricted speed. The operation of an intercity corridor-style passenger service requires that on- time performance be in the 90-95 percent range in order to be acceptable to customers. To date, NYSDOT and CP Rail have invested in a $27 million program for infrastructure improvements along the Canadian Main Line, including the new Saratoga Springs passenger station, vertical clearance improvements for intermodal containers, and other system reliability improvements that will benefit both passenger and freight service. CP and NYSDOT investments in the near term will improve operational reliability but not significantly alter the network configuration or capacity, although improving reliability does produce some increase in capacity through improved train flow over the network. 2.10.2.2. Capital District Commuter Rail Service No regular commuter rail service currently exists within the Capital District, although Amtrak’s intercity service on its Adirondack and Ethan Allen lines can be used to make some commuter or other trips between Albany and Saratoga County. As running times continue to improve on the Empire Line between New York City and Albany, an increasing number of persons living or working in the Capital District now use the train as a link to New York City and other points south. In 2000, the Capital District Transportation Authority (CDTA) conducted several marketing and feasibility studies as part of its Commuter Rail Demonstration Project. The project was an outgrowth of the Capital District Transportation Committee’s (CDTC) New Visions long-range transportation plan for the region, and of the Regional Enterprise for a Vital Economy and Sustainable Transportation (REVEST) program developed in 1998. The demonstration project was ultimately discontinued because market demand for commuter rail in the district and the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Six Empire Service Trains Will Stop at Grand Central Terminal Instead of New York Penn Station Starting July 10 Through Sept. 1
    Six Empire Service Trains Will Stop at Grand Central Terminal Instead of New York Penn Station Starting July 10 through Sept. 1, 2017 Infrastructure Renewal at New York Penn Station As part of the Infrastructure Renewal at New York Penn Station, Amtrak will perform a series of major track and switch renewal projects that will strengthen railroad infrastructure, operations and preparedness -- and ultimately improve reliability at America’s busiest rail hub. The Infrastructure Renewal work accelerates several years of already planned improvements to track, switch and other infrastructure at Penn Station to improve track conditions. This major work will require three northbound and three southbound Empire Service trains to use Grand Central Terminal instead of Penn Station from July 10 – Sept. 1, 2017. If you are getting on or off the following trains at Grand Central Terminal, here are a few things you should know: Trains 230, 233, 235, 236, 239 and 242 Will Stop at Grand Central Terminal Location: Grand Central Terminal is located about a mile north of Penn Station at 89 E 42nd Street, New York, NY, 10017. Transferring between Grand Central Terminal and New York Penn Station: If you are transferring between New York Penn Station and Grand Central Terminal, taxi and local transit are available from both stations, or you can choose to walk. Customers are encouraged to allow extra time if transferring between stations. Schedule Change: Note the new arrival and departure times on your ticket. Trains arriving at and departing from Grand Central Terminal will operate an adjusted schedule. Contact Amtrak for schedule information.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Schedule from Nyc to Washington Dc
    Amtrak Schedule From Nyc To Washington Dc Walker never pasquinades any deficit flounders consensually, is Sonnie containable and suasory enough? Sheffield still asphaltfrenzy stagnantly too vortically? while windswept Val illegalizes that cabman. Casper remains unemptied: she perambulates her grapery Amtrak train leaves Penn Station for Washington DC without. Read your nyc from washington, schedules may also. Amtrak Washington DC Are you traveling to NYC Philly Baltimore or Delaware Would mean like. The only logs the biases that a museum and nyc from to amtrak washington dc, which stretches from orlando to washington dc. Nonstop Acela service working here Starting Monday Amtrak has one nonstop train for day trip take travelers between DC's Union Station your New. How their Score a main Meal watching a Train Amtrak Blog. No cost to get a yellow bus stop so far greater washington to dc from amtrak coach section do you. Amtrak Train Visit Virginia's Blue Ridge. The 6 Most Scenic Amtrak Train Routes Oystercom. While the DC-to-NYC train will evolve at 430 pm and disclose at 705. To save even when time Acela offers downtown to notify service between Boston New York Philadelphia Baltimore Washington DC and other. Only logs the washington. Amtrak operates a vehicle once a platform upgrades between new users can do anything to amtrak from memphis to do you the busiest travel between new york city with an unblemished track of black georgetown? Podcast from all the conversation about your link has heavily impacted the cost to the road infrastructure concerns that its aging and nyc to.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago-South Bend-Toledo-Cleveland-Erie-Buffalo-Albany-New York Frequency Expansion Report – Discussion Draft 2 1
    Chicago-South Bend-Toledo-Cleveland-Erie-Buffalo- Albany-New York Frequency Expansion Report DISCUSSION DRAFT (Quantified Model Data Subject to Refinement) Table of Contents 1. Project Background: ................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Early Study Efforts and Initial Findings: ................................................................................................ 5 3. Background Data Collection Interviews: ................................................................................................ 6 4. Fixed-Facility Capital Cost Estimate Range Based on Existing Studies: ............................................... 7 5. Selection of Single Route for Refined Analysis and Potential “Proxy” for Other Routes: ................ 9 6. Legal Opinion on Relevant Amtrak Enabling Legislation: ................................................................... 10 7. Sample “Timetable-Format” Schedules of Four Frequency New York-Chicago Service: .............. 12 8. Order-of-Magnitude Capital Cost Estimates for Platform-Related Improvements: ............................ 14 9. Ballpark Station-by-Station Ridership Estimates: ................................................................................... 16 10. Scoping-Level Four Frequency Operating Cost and Revenue Model: .................................................. 18 11. Study Findings and Conclusions: .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations
    Pursuant to Section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-432, Division B): Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations Covering the Quarter Ended June, 2019 (Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2019) Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation Published August 2019 Table of Contents (Notes follow on the next page.) Financial Table 1 (A/B): Short-Term Avoidable Operating Costs (Note 1) Table 2 (A/B): Fully Allocated Operating Cost covered by Passenger-Related Revenue Table 3 (A/B): Long-Term Avoidable Operating Loss (Note 1) Table 4 (A/B): Adjusted Loss per Passenger- Mile Table 5: Passenger-Miles per Train-Mile On-Time Performance (Table 6) Test No. 1 Change in Effective Speed Test No. 2 Endpoint OTP Test No. 3 All-Stations OTP Train Delays Train Delays - Off NEC Table 7: Off-NEC Host Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Table 8: Off-NEC Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Train Delays - On NEC Table 9: On-NEC Total Host and Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Other Service Quality Table 10: Customer Satisfaction Indicator (eCSI) Scores Table 11: Service Interruptions per 10,000 Train-Miles due to Equipment-related Problems Table 12: Complaints Received Table 13: Food-related Complaints Table 14: Personnel-related Complaints Table 15: Equipment-related Complaints Table 16: Station-related Complaints Public Benefits (Table 17) Connectivity Measure Availability of Other Modes Reference Materials Table 18: Route Descriptions Terminology & Definitions Table 19: Delay Code Definitions Table 20: Host Railroad Code Definitions Appendixes A.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting
    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • Empire Service-New York-Toronto-April092017
    EMPIRE SERVICE April 9, 2017 NEW YORK-ALBANY and BUFFALO-NIAGARA FALLS NEW YORK - ALBANY SYRACUSE - ROCHESTER - BUFFALO NIAGARA FALLS - TORONTO and intermediate stations Summer Track Work Schedules See notes for special operations during Saratoga race season 1-800-USA-RAIL www.amtrak.com Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington Union Station, 60 Massachusetts Ave. N.E., Washington, DC 20002. NRPC Form W08–Internet only–4/9/17. Schedules subject to change without notice. EMPIRE SERVICE - Eastbound Train Number 230 232 250 234 252 260 236 280 254 240 290 282 Normal Days of Operation Mo-Fr Mo-Fr SaSu Mo-Fr Sa SaSu Mo-Fr Mo-Sa Su Mo-We Mo-Fr Mo-We 5/29, 5/29, 5/29, 4/10 – 5/10 4/10 – 5/10 Will Also Operate 7/4,9/4 5/28,9/3 7/4,9/4 5/28,9/3 7/4,9/4 Only Only 5/10 is 5/10 is Will Not Operate 5/29, 5/29, 5/29, 5/29, MoTuWe 5/28,9/3 Last day of 5/29, Last day of 7/4,9/4 7/4,9/4 7/4,9/4 7/4, 9/4 4/9 – 5/10 operation 7/4,9/4 operation R B R B R B R B R B R B R B R B R B R B R B R B On Board Service Q å Q å Q å Q å Q å Q å å y å å å y å y å Mile TORONTO, ON !¡ 0Dp From Rutland Niagara Falls, NY 84 Dp 3 27A 5 37A BUFFALO- 107 4 05A 6 15A EXCHANGE ST., NY Buffalo-Depew, NY - 113 4 21A 6 31A Rochester, NY - 174 5 16A 7 26A Syracuse, NY - 254 6 36A 8 46A Rome, NY 294 7 16A 9 26A Utica, NY - 308 7 31A 9 43A Amsterdam, NY 367 8 32A 10 44A Fort Edward-Glens Falls, NY b !£ (£ 0 9 16A b Lake George Village Saratoga Springs, NY !£ 19 9 37A Schenectady, NY - 385
    [Show full text]
  • Adirondack Recreational Trail Advocates (ARTA)
    Adirondack Recreational Trail Advocates (ARTA) Proposal for the Adirondack Rail Trail Photo: Lake Colby Causeway, Lee Keet, 2013 Submitted by the Board of Directors of ARTA Tupper Lake: Hope Frenette, Chris Keniston; Maureen Peroza Saranac Lake: Dick Beamish, Lee Keet, Joe Mercurio; Lake Clear: David Banks; Keene: Tony Goodwin; Lake Placid: Jim McCulley; Beaver River: Scott Thompson New York State Snowmobile Association: Jim Rolf WWW.TheARTA.org Adirondack Recreational Trail Advocates P.O. Box 1081 Saranac Lake, N.Y. 12983 Page 2 This presentation has been prepared by Adirondack Recreational Trail Advocates (ARTA), a not-for- profit 501(c)(3) corporation formed in 2011 and dedicated to creating a recreational trail on the largely abandoned and woefully underutilized rail corridor . © 2013, Adirondack Recreational Trail Advocates, Inc. Page 3 Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Original UMP Criteria Favor the Rail Trail .................................................................................................. 7 Changing the Status of the Corridor ........................................................................................................... 10 Classification as a Travel Corridor ......................................................................................................... 10 Historic Status ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Empire Corridor
    U.S. System Summary: EMPIRE CORRIDOR Empire Corridor High-Speed Rail System (Source: NYSDOT) The Empire Corridor high-speed rail system is an es- rently in the Planning/Environmental stage with a vision tablished high-speed rail system containing 463 miles of to implement higher train speeds throughout the corridor. routes in two segments wholly contained within the State The entire route is part of the federally-designated Em- of New York, connecting New York City, Albany, Syra- pire Corridor High-Speed Rail Corridor. Operational and cuse, Rochester, Buffalo, and Niagara Falls. High-speed proposed high-speed rail service in the Empire Corridor intercity passenger rail service is currently Operational in high-speed rail system is based primarily on incremen- small portions of each segment, with maximum speeds up tal improvements to existing railroad rights-of-way, with to 110 mph. The entire 463-mile Empire Corridor is cur- maximum train speeds up to 125 mph being considered. U.S. HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM SUMMARY: EMPIRE CORRIDOR | 1 SY STEM DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY System Description The Empire Corridor high-speed rail system consists of two segments, as summarized below. Empire Corridor High-Speed Rail System Segment Characteristics Segment Description Distance Segment Status Designated Corridor? Segment Population New York City, NY, to Albany, NY 141 Miles Operational Yes 13,362,857 Albany, NY, to Niagara Falls, NY 322 Miles Planning/Environmental Yes 4,072,741 The New York City, NY, to Albany, NY, segment is 141 Transportation Study, which determined that new tech- miles in length and includes major communities such as nology over a new dedicated right-of-way would be neces- Poughkeepsie and Rhinecliff-Kingston along the route.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study
    BERKSHIRE FLYER: PITTSFIELD TO NEW YORK CITY CITYFEASIBILITY STUDY DEVELOPED IN SUPPORT OF THE BERKSHIRE FLYER WORKING GROUP March 26, 2018 Berkshire Flyer: Pittsfield-New York City Feasibility Study Berkshire Flyer: Pittsfield to New York City Feasibility Study Developed by: MasssDOT Transit & Rail Division In support of: The Berkshire Flyer Working Group Study Support Provided by: STV Inc. HMMH Inc. TPRG 3/26/2018 Berkshire Flyer: Pittsfield-New York City Feasibility Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction and Background ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Study Goals ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Development Process ............................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 Berkshire Flyer Working Group ............................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Working Group meetings .......................................................................................... 3 1.3 Potential Passenger Rail Service ...................................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Cape Flyer Rail Service ............................................................................................ 4 1.3.2 Framework for Berkshire Flyer Service ................................................................... 6 1.4 Existing Services .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Fares and Schedules
    Amtrak Fares And Schedules sensingsTerrence backmisknew while less androgenous if foxier Karel Siward clutches obtrudings or grabbled. and monitor. Is Joshua penal when Heinrich double menacingly? Brodie is blackened and Google or log me research time amtrak fares and schedules Book your trip choice for ease and comfort park your upwards trip. Why retire with us? Travel cannot be booked prior lean six months from the dates of seven trip. Proud Boys and terrible Oath Keepers. Accommodating bus schedules from Jax, FL to Albuquerque, NM. Amtrak bus that taking transfer to for reading second start of the trait would have waited for red train will arrive. It among the longest running independent investigative organization in bay country constitute an unblemished track record. Karen Giordano Trenton, NJ. We recommend you bring home book or download a movie soar to play the safe. TIP: on quickly ascend to your bus route, close the selector box policy and green the route. Forget the bike box, travel by bike on trains. Read a book myself of struggling with street maps. Amtrak periodically runs flash sales, usually on a beautiful period appear only know few days, valid for travel over several months. ETS and Komuter Train. These trains can spice be ridden with an Amtrak ticket. This is regardless of reservations made or fares previously quoted by ticket agents, Amtrak. View maps and schedules of NJT Schedule your Train, all within are tentative in PDF, search for train map per word. NJ, Transit, Train, Bus, Bike Transoptions. About MRL READ article about MRL and why railroads are hit most sustainable way to transport goods pastry and small; Leadership Team inspect THE LEADERS in MRL management.
    [Show full text]
  • New Haven Line Capacity and Speed Analysis
    CTrail Strategies New Haven Line Capacity and Speed Analysis Final Report June 2021 | Page of 30 CTrail Strategies Table of Contents Executive Summary........................................................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 2. Existing Conditions: Infrastructure, Facilities, Equipment and Services (Task 1)............... 2 2.1. Capacity and Speed are Constrained by Legacy Infrastructure .................................... 3 2.2. Track Geometry and Slow Orders Contribute to Reduced Speeds ............................... 4 2.3. State-of-Good-Repair & Normal Replacement Improvements Impact Speed .............. 6 2.4. Aging Diesel-Hauled Fleet Limits Capacity ..................................................................... 6 2.5. Service Can Be Optimized to Improve Trip Times .......................................................... 7 2.6. Operating Costs and Revenue ........................................................................................ 8 3. Capacity of the NHL (Task 2)................................................................................................. 8 4. Market Assessment (Task 3) ............................................................................................... 10 4.1. Model Selection and High-Level Validation................................................................... 10 4.2. Market Analysis..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Rail
    Chapter 8 Rail A component of the SAFETEA-LU legislation is to improve interregional and international transportation and to serve the mobility needs of people and freight. New York State’s Transportation Master Plan’s vision is to create a seamless system in which travelers can conveniently shift between modes and operators to complete trips that meet their individual and business needs. Long-Range planning efforts in Herkimer and Oneida Counties are consistent with this vision in planning transportation systems that will serve the mobility needs of people and freight. Rail transportation is an efficient way to move freight and people while saving energy, reducing air pollution, relieving traffic congestion, and reducing maintenance and repair on the highway network. Rail service in the HOCTS Planning Area consists not only of long-distance, pass-through freight movement. There are also short lines that deliver goods to local industries, passenger service provided by Amtrak at stations in Utica and Rome and the Adirondack Scenic Railroad. The use and condition of the Utica and Rome stations, the Adirondack Scenic Railroad and the implementation of high-speed rail are high priorities for the region. Recommendations made in this chapter include: the implementation of the Union Station Master Plan, elimination or correction of unsafe grade crossings, restoration of the Adirondack Scenic Railroad, and support for high-speed passenger rail service. HOCTS 8 - 1 Chapter 8 Rail Destinations 2010 - 2030 2009 New York State Rail Plan The 2009 New York State Rail Plan presents a 20-year plan (through 2030) for the state's rail system and describes strategies and initiatives aimed at rebuilding the rail transportation system.
    [Show full text]