DOCSLIB.ORG

Status Report, Final Version, 080229

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Status Report, Final Version, 080229 Northern Europe Regional initiative – Implementation Group “Optimizing the use of the interconnectors – SwePol Link and Baltic Cable” Status report Ref: ERI-NO-IG Final version 11-04-2008 European Regulators’ Group for Electricity and Gas Contact: Council of European Energy Regulators ASBL 28 rue le Titien, 1000 Bruxelles Arrondissement judiciaire de Bruxelles RPM 0861.035.445 Ref: ERI-NO-IG [Optimizing the use of the interconnectors – SwePol Link and Baltic Cable] Document history Version Date Description Author 1 2007-04-03 Initial Draft Tony Rosten 2 2007-04-27 Draft 2 Tony Rosten 3 2007-05-07 Draft 3 Tony Rosten 4 2007-06-12 Draft 4 Tony Rosten 5 2007-08-24 Draft 5 Tony Rosten 6 2007-09-19 Draft 6 Tony Rosten 7 2007-10-03 Draft 7 Tony Rosten 8 2007-11-23 Draft 8 Tony Rosten 9 2007-12-19 Draft 9 Tony Rosten 10 2008-01-08 Draft 10 Tony Rosten 11 2008-02-18 Draft 11 Tony Rosten 12 2008-02-29 Final version Tony Rosten 2/63 Ref: ERI-NO-IG [Optimizing the use of the interconnectors – SwePol Link and Baltic Cable] Table of Contents 1 BACKGROUND................................................................................................................... 5 2 THE ELECTRICITY MARKETS AND PRESENT SITUATIONS .......................................... 7 2.1 Sweden ........................................................................................................................ 7 2.1.1 Market description........................................................................................... 7 2.1.2 Overview of the regulatory authority’s role and responsibilities ..................... 10 2.2 Germany..................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Market description......................................................................................... 11 2.2.2 Overview of the regulatory authority’s role and responsibilities ..................... 13 2.3 Poland ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.3.1 Market description......................................................................................... 16 2.3.2 Overview of the regulatory authority’s role and responsibilities ..................... 20 3 INTERCONNECTORS BETWEEN SWEDEN AND CONTINENTAL EUROPE................. 22 3.1 Background ................................................................................................................ 22 3.2 Baltic Cable ................................................................................................................ 22 3.2.1 History, ownership and legal structure .......................................................... 22 3.2.2 Utilisation of the interconnector, capacity allocation and third party access... 22 3.2.3 Circumstances limiting the use of the interconnector .................................... 23 3.2.4 Circumstances limiting third party access ..................................................... 23 3.3 SwePol Link................................................................................................................ 23 3.3.1 History, ownership and legal structure .......................................................... 23 3.3.2 Utilisation of the interconnector, capacity allocation and third party access... 24 3.3.3 Circumstances limiting the use of the interconnector .................................... 24 3.3.4 Circumstances limiting third party access ..................................................... 25 3/63 Ref: ERI-NO-IG [Optimizing the use of the interconnectors – SwePol Link and Baltic Cable] 4 THE EC LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK AND INTERPRETATION OF THE LEGAL SITUATION REGARDING THE CABLES................................................................................ 26 4.1 Regulators view of the interpretation of the legal situation .......................................... 26 4.1.1 Background................................................................................................... 26 4.1.2 The relevant Community legislation .............................................................. 27 4.1.2 The judgement of the European Court of Justice in Case C-17/03 VEMW and others ECR I-4983...................................................................................................... 31 4.1.3 Legal conclusion as regards SwePol Link and Baltic Cable .......................... 32 4.2 Baltic Cable AB´s position on the legal status fo Baltic Cable vs EC law..................... 33 4.2.1 Summary ...................................................................................................... 33 4.2.2 Baltic Cable under EC law ............................................................................ 34 4.3 SwePol Link AB´s position on the legal status of SwePol Link vs EC law ................... 37 4.4 Svenska Kraftnät´s legal position concerning SwePol Link AB ................................... 39 4.5 Vattenfall AB´s position on the legal situation of SwePol Link ..................................... 45 4.6 PSE-Operator position on the situation of SwePol Link............................................... 47 5 SUMMARY OF THE WORK IN THE IMPLEMENTATION GROUP AND THE CURRENT SITUATION REGARDING SWEPOL LINK AND BALTIC CABLE .......................................... 49 ANNEX 1 – DESCRIPTION BALTIC CABLE (BASED ON A DOCUMENT FROM THE CABLE OWNERS)................................................................................................................................ 51 ANNEX 2 – DESCRIPTION SWEPOL LINK (BASED ON A DOCUMENT FROM THE CABLE OWNERS)................................................................................................................................ 57 ANNEX 3 – VALUE AND DIRECTION OF ENERGY FLOW USING SWEPOL LINK.............. 62 ANNEX 4 – PARTICIPANTS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION GROUP ........................................ 63 4/63 Ref: ERI-NO-IG [Optimizing the use of the interconnectors – SwePol Link and Baltic Cable] 1 Background There is a general understanding that integration of electricity markets requires an efficient utilization of existing interconnectors. The regional approach as a transitional phase towards the creation of one internal electricity market was first launched in the March 2004 Strategy Paper of The Commission. The subsequent ERGEG Regional Initiative is also explicitly supported by the Energy Council 8 June 2006, while at the same time stressing that “Cross-border exchange of energy should be improved and the regional energy cooperation should be accelerated…” There are currently five existing interconnectors on the Nordic-Continental interface today and this Implementation Group will focus on Baltic Cable and SwePol Link which both are operated as “merchant lines”. In this report merchant line will refer to an interconnector where the owners have priority rights to the capacity, and where the cost for the cable are covered by the users (i.e. no part of the cost is included in the calculation of the respective national grid tariffs). There are two issues that have to be addressed in the work of the Implementation Group for SwePol Link and Baltic Cable: • the present operation of the cables including opportunities for third party access • how these cables can be integrated in a common coordinated regional congestion management method according to the provisions in the CMG (Congestion Management Guidelines) Special attention will be given to the consequences of the present ownership structure and capacity allocation, with view to move towards common capacity allocation and congestion management methods on all present and future interconnectors between the Nordel area and continental Europe. 5/63 Ref: ERI-NO-IG [Optimizing the use of the interconnectors – SwePol Link and Baltic Cable] There are terms of reference stated by the the Regional Coordination Committee (RCC) of the ERGEG Northern Europe Electricity Regional Initiative. According to the terms of reference the implementation group will describe the current situation, the EC legal framework, describe the pros and cons of present methods applied, list alternative solutions and finally propose capacity allocation and congestion management mechanisms for Baltic Cable and SwePol Link which aligns them as much as possible with other interconnectors between Nordel area and continental Europe. The Implementation Group only addresses issues in relation to day-ahead allocation and utilization of transmission capacity. However the possibilities for intra-day utilization are also important for the total efficient use of interconnectors. Furthermore, the implementation group does not address the issue how available transmission capacity (ATC) for the interconnectors is determined as a function of the situation in the surrounding national grids. Parallel to the work in this implementation group, the IG Transparency of the Northern Europe region has recently published a report containing a common regional understanding of market relevant information to be published by TSOs/PXs. This is based on present EU transparency requirements as well as ERGEG guidelines published. The implementation is to take place in a two step approach during 2008. The IG Transparency will be monitoring the implementation. In the report it is mentioned that it should be discussed in this IG to what extent the transparency rules can be adopted regarding Baltic Cable and SwePol Link. 6/63 Ref: ERI-NO-IG [Optimizing the use of the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Swepol Link Sets New Environmental Standard for HVDC Transmission
    00 ABB Review 4/2001 SwePol Link sets new environmental standard for HVDC transmission Leif Söderberg, Bernt Abrahamsson Six cable links – all of them HVDC (high-voltage direct current) – are currently in service between the power grids of continental Europe and the Nordic region, with another five planned. The latest to be brought on line is the SwePol Link, which connects the electricity networks of Poland and Sweden. It is unique in that, unlike previous installations that depend on electrode stations to transmit the return current under ground or under water, it uses 20-kV XLPE cable to carry this current. The high-voltage HVDC submarine cable used for the SwePol Link is designed for 600 MW at 450 kV. he reason for all these links is the technically feasible to reverse the entire onds to prevent grid failure if the voltage T vital need to secure power system 600 MW power throughput of the in southern Sweden drops below 380 kV. reliability in each of the participating SwePol Link in just 1.3 seconds, although With all previous links of this kind, countries. They make it easier to this is not a feature that will be used in electrode stations off the coast transmit optimize power generation in an area in practice. Nevertheless, a typical emer- the return current under the sea, and this which different countries use different gency power measure could call for a has worked perfectly well (Table 1). The means of power generation and have ∆P ramp-up of 300 MW within a few sec- first such cable link was laid in 1954 different power demand profiles over a 24-hour period.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Stories: Contributions to the History of Electricity in Sweden
    Electric Stories Contributions to the history of electricity in Sweden Collected papers by Mats Bladh Published by Linköping University Electronic Press, 2011 ISBN: 978‐91‐7393‐078‐9 URL: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva‐70080 Cover Photo: Aatu Liimatta © The Author Content About Collected Papers ............................................................................................. 5 About the author ....................................................................................................... 6 “Momentum” In the Swedish Electricity Industry ..................................................... 7 Abstract .......................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Four beginnings .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Utilities ........................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Industrial firms ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 Power companies ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Network Development Plan 2016 – 2025
    NOVEMBER 2015 NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2016 – 2025 A Ten-Year Plan for the Swedish National Grid. SVENSKA KRAFTNÄT Our society is dependent on electricity. Svenska kraftnät is responsible for ensuring that Sweden has a safe, environmentally sound and cost-effective transmission system for electricity – today and in the future. We achieve this in the short term by monitoring the electrical system around the clock, and in the long term by building new power lines to meet tomorrow’s electricity needs. Cover photo Tomas Ärlemo Org. Nr 202100-4284 SVENSKA KRAFTNÄT Box 1200 172 24 Sundbyberg Sweden Sturegatan 1 Tel +46 10-475 80 00 Fax +46 10-475 89 50 www.svk.se/en PREFACE The board of Svenska kraftnät decided in April 2013 on a long-term plan document for the development of the Swedish National Grid. Long-term plan 2025 described the challenges for Svenska kraftnät in the 10 to 15 years term. The purpose was, among other things, to increase the transparency of Svenska kraftnät’s planning and to provide an opportunity for the various stakeholders in the electricity market to influence it. Until then, the national network planning mainly consisted of the three-year investment and financing plans that Svenska kraftnät annually provide to the Government. These plans are, however, primarily a description of how investments already decided are expected to turn out over the next three financial years. They do not give an account of the Administration’s long-term priorities and the grounds for them. A certain network planning is conducted also at Nordic level in order to identify grid reinforcements with specific benefit for the whole of the Nordic electricity market.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands
    20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands VDE-Bezirksverein Kassel e.V., Universität Kassel am 21.01.2016 Walter Schossig, Gotha VDE Ausschuss Geschichte der Elektrotechnik [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de Tel: 03621/701016 Folie 1 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands Chronologie Entstehung von Verbundnetzen Trennung des Deutschen Verbundnetzes Entwicklung in Ost- und Westeuropa Innerdeutscher Stromexport Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands Erweiterung des Europäischen Verbundnetzes Ein Auszug der Vortragsfolien. Bei Interesse an Quellenangaben oder weiteren Informationen: [email protected] bzw. www.walter-schossig.de/Literatur [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de Tel: 03621/701016 Folie 2 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands Beginn der Stromversorgung 1866-1878 Technisch wirtschaftliche Versuche 1878-1884 Einzelanlagen 1884-1890 Blockanlagen 1890-1900 Ortszentralen 1900-1913 Überlandzentralen 1913-1915 Anfänge der Verbundwirtschaft [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de Tel: 03621/701016 Folie 3 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands < Einzelanlagen 1878-1884 > 1878 St.George Lane Fox (GB) u. Thomas Alva Edison (US) entwickeln erste Pläne zur kollektiven Verteilung des Stromes in ganze Stadtteile, die im Jahre 1881 in Godalming (GB) und ein Jahr später in New York (US) ihre erste Anwendung finden [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Infrastructure Projects in the Baltic Sea
    FACTS ISSUE 2 | 06 – 2007 FACTS ABOUT THE NATURAL GAS PIPELINE ACROSS THE BALTIC SEA ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN THE BALTIC SEA ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES CAN BE numerous rivers that flow into the sea. Historically, COPED WITH the main challenge for infrastructure projects has therefore been to maintain this balance. Nord Stream is only one of several planned or already operating energy infrastructure projects Energy infrastructure projects like pipelines, wind in the Baltic Sea. In addition to the pipeline from farms and submarine power cables are in general Vyborg to Greifswald, further offshore natural gas smaller than infrastructure projects like bridges, pipelines across the Baltic Sea are under consid- tunnels and harbours. However, the energy projects eration: Poland is interested in a connection from stretch over longer distances and it may therefore Denmark across the Baltic Sea (Baltic Pipe), while be necessary to cross sensitive areas, like munitions Estonia and Finland are also planning a connecting dump sites. pipeline across the sea (Balticconnector). Further- more, subsea power cables and several offshore All use of the sea has an impact; this includes energy wind parks already exist or are planned in the infrastructure as well as ship traffic or traffic infra- Baltic Sea. All of these projects are striving to keep structure. One of the reasons for choosing locations their impact on the environment as low as possible in the sea instead of onshore is the availability of and to preserve the Baltic ecosystem as it is. “Nord space, which is becoming a scarce resource. In this Stream: Facts” talked to Per Jørgensen, a leading context, the impact of large diameter pipelines like international expert in the field of infrastructure, Nord Stream is almost the same as smaller pipeline energy and environment about these projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Det Här Underlaget För Tidigt Samråd För Kriegers Flak Är Framtaget Av Sweden Offshore Wind AB Som Ingår Numera I Vattenfall-Koncernen
    Det här underlaget för tidigt samråd för Kriegers flak är framtaget av Sweden Offshore Wind AB som ingår numera i Vattenfall-koncernen. 1. Bakgrund och syfte......................................................................................................... 1 2. Presentation av företaget ................................................................................................ 2 3. Lokalisering och utformning av transformatorstationerna............................................. 3 4. Lokalisering och utformning av sjökablarna.................................................................. 5 5. Beskrivning av berörda områden till havs och vid kusten ............................................. 6 6. Beskrivning av de identifierade landningspunkterna................................................... 10 7. Beskrivning av projektets olika faser........................................................................... 15 8. Fysisk påverkan på omgivningen och konsekvenser av påverkan............................... 16 9. Alternativa lokaliseringar............................................................................................. 23 10. Alternativ utformning............................................................................................... 23 11. Nollalternativ............................................................................................................ 24 12. Kontaktuppgifter ...................................................................................................... 24 1. Bakgrund
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report January–September 2020
    Interim report January–September 2020 Business highlights, July–September 2020 Financial highlights, January–September 2020 • Unusually high hydrological balance puts pressure on Nordic • Net sales decreased by 4% (-5% excluding currency effects) electricity prices to SEK 114,815 million (120,181) • Inauguration of Princess Ariane wind farm in the Netherlands • Underlying operating profit1 of SEK 17,802 million (16,889) • Participation in auction for closure of Moorburg power plant in • Operating profit1 of SEK 10,030 million (19,715) Hamburg • Profit for the period of SEK 1,989 million (14,373) • Tendering process for the electricity grid in Berlin rejected by Financial highlights, July–September 2020 the Higher Regional Court. After the end of the quarter, • Net sales decreased by 2% (0% excluding currency effects) Vattenfall offered to sell the company Stromnetz Berlin to the to SEK 35,375 million (35,938) State of Berlin • Underlying operating profit1 of SEK 4,818 million (3,594) • Inauguration of pilot plant for HYBRIT, a partnership project • Operating profit1 of SEK 4,743 million (8,677) for fossil-free steel production • Profit for the period of SEK 3,583 million (6,700) • Anna Borg named as new President and CEO, effective 1 November KEY DATA Jan-Sep Jan-Sep Jul-Sep Jul-Sep Full year Last 12 Amounts in SEK million unless indicated otherwise 2020 2019 2020 2019 2019 months Net sales 114 815 120 181 35 375 35 938 166 360 160 994 Operating profit before depreciation, amortisation and 1 impairment losses (EBITDA) 34 387 33 601 9
    [Show full text]
  • Prisbildning Och Konkurrens På Elmarknaden
    Prisbildning och konkurrens på elmarknaden ER 2006:13 Böcker och rapporter utgivna av Statens energimyndighet kan beställas från Energimyndighetens förlag. Orderfax: 016-544 22 59 e-post: [email protected] © Statens energimyndighet Upplaga: 200 ex ER 2006:13 ISSN 1403-1892 Förord På uppdrag av regeringen har Energimarknadsinspektionen vid Statens energimyndighet analyserat den svenska och nordiska elmarknadens funktionssätt med tonvikt på konkurrensen och prisbildningen. Den 1 januari 1996 reformerades den svenska elmarknaden. Konkurrens infördes i handel med och produktion av el medan nätverksamhet är ett reglerat monopol. Prisutvecklingen på den svenska och nordiska elmarknaden under de senaste åren har föranlett en diskussion om hur väl elmarknaden fungerar. Bland annat har lönsamheten bland elmarknadens aktörer och effektiviteten i prisbildningen på råkraftsmarknaden ifrågasatts. Rapporten belyser utvecklingen på den nordiska råkraftsmarknaden och söker förklara det senaste decenniets elprisökningar. Vidare behandlas konsekvenserna för slutkunderna på den nordiska slutkundsmarknaden. Därefter analyseras konkurrensen på den nordiska elmarknaden. Inspektionen föreslår även ett antal åtgärder för att förbättra förutsättningarna för en väl fungerande konkurrens på elmarknaden. Även konkurrenssituationen på den svenska slutkundsmarknaden behandlas. I det nordiska elsystemet är det viktigt att begränsningar i överföringskapacitet hanteras på ett rationellt sätt. I rapporten analyseras några konsekvenser av att införa en delning av Sverige i så kallade elspotområden. Energimarknadsinspektionen har i arbetet med rapporten, och för att inhämta synpunkter, samarbetat med en referensgrupp bestående av företrädare från näringslivet samt representanter från andra berörda myndigheter och organisationer. Sammanfattning och slutsatser Den 1 januari 1996 reformerades den svenska elmarknaden. Konkurrens infördes i handel med och produktion av el medan nätverksamhet är ett reglerat monopol.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019 .Pdf 18MB
    Annual Report Statkraft AS 2019 CONTENT 3 Introduction 3 Statkraft at a glance 6 The Board of Directors 7 The Corporate Management 8 Letter from the CEO 9 Report from the Board of Directors 12 Strategy – Powering a green future 16 Financial performance 20 Segments 25 Risk management 29 Sustainability 31 Sustainability management 33 Statkraft’s contribution 35 Social disclosures 41 Environmental disclosures 45 Economic disclosures 49 Corporate Governance 59 Statements 59 Group Financial Statements 59 Financial Statements 64 Notes 129 Statkraft AS Financial Statements 129 Financial Statements 133 Notes 150 Auditor’s Statement 155 Sustainability Statement 170 Auditor’s Statement 176 Declaration from the Board of Directors and CEO 177 Key figures and Alternative Performance Measures Statkraft is a leading renewable energy company with activities on three continents within hydro, wind and solar. Through our market activities and production assets we create value for our owner, our customers and the societies we operate in. Statkraft at a glance USA Statkraft has 4.000 employees Peru Brazil in 16 countries Chile Europe’s largest producer of renewable energy EBIT underlying Net profit Cash flow from operations 17.6 11.3 12.0 NOK BILLION NOK BILLION NOK BILLION ROACE Net interest-bearing debt Dividend paid in 2019 16.3 16.0 8.5 PER CENT NOK BILLION NOK BILLION Norway Sweden The Netherlands United Kingdom Ireland Germany France Spain Nepal Albania Turkey India Power generated in 2019 Share renewable energy Investments in 2019 61 93 7.4 TWH PER CENT NOK BILLION Standard & Poor's Fitch Ratings' long-term rating long-term rating A- BBB+ 59% Norway 27% Europe 14% Outside Europe 5 ANNUAL REPORT 2019 | STATKRAFT AS 6 The Board of Directors From the left: Vilde Eriksen Bjerknes, Mikael Lundin, Ingelise Arntsen, Asbjørn Sevlejordet, Thorhild Widvey, Peter Mellbye, Bengt Ekenstierna, Hilde Drønen and Thorbjørn Holøs Thorhild Widvey Peter Mellbye Hilde Drønen Born 1956, Norwegian Born 1949, Norwegian Born 1961, Norwegian Chair of the board, member since 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • The Baltic Cable HVDC Connection Sweden / Germany
    Submarine Cable Link The Baltic Cable HVDC Connection Sweden / Germany Sweden Germany Cable data Project content Voltage 450 kV DC HVDC cable and accessories Power 600 MW HVDC converter stations Length 250 km Cable system design Conductor 1600 mm2 Cu Project management Insulation MIND Installation (on land and at sea) Weight 55 kg/m Customer Baltic Cable AB Year 1994 World record holder for length, voltage and power Four new world record were set in 1994 Cable Route by ABB, with the successful completion The Västra Kärrstorp converter station of the Baltic Cable HVDC transmission in Sweden was built close to an existing link between Sweden and Germany: transformer station at Arrie, south of Malmö and about 17 km from the coast. 1) Stretching over 250 km, it was the The link was first routed through a 12 longest submarine HVDC cable km overhead line, then by land for about ever laid. 5.3 km to the coast. From there it runs 2) At 600 MW, the Baltic Cable is one across the bottom of the Baltic Sea to of the most powerful HVDC cables the mouth of the River Trave in in commercial operation. Germany. The cable then follows the 3) With 450 kV DC, the cable has the course of the Trave for a distance of 12 highest voltage rating of all existing km until it reaches the Herrenwyk submarine HVDC cables. converter station in the outskirts of 4) The 5.3 km land section of the Lübeck in Germany. The total length of cable in Sweden was laid in one the link is 262 km, of which 250 km are continuous length in an open-cut HVDC power cables.
    [Show full text]
  • Form 20-F 2006
    As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2007. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F (Mark One) n REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR ¥ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2006 OR n TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR n SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of event requiring this shell company report . For the transition period from to Commission file number: 1-14688 E.ON AG (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) E.ON AG (Translation of Registrant’s name into English) Federal Republic of Germany E.ON-Platz 1, D-40479 Du¨sseldorf, GERMANY (Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (Address of Principal Executive Offices) Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered American Depositary Shares representing Ordinary Shares with no par value New York Stock Exchange Ordinary Shares with no par value New York Stock Exchange* Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None (Title of Class) Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None (Title of Class) Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
    [Show full text]
  • Trygg Elförsörjning I Skåne Län – Underlagsrapport Utgiven Av: Länsstyrelsen Skåne Författare: Hannes Sonnsjö [email protected]
    Titel: Trygg elförsörjning i Skåne län – underlagsrapport Utgiven av: Länsstyrelsen Skåne Författare: Hannes Sonnsjö [email protected] Medförfattare: Tobias Gunneberg Sandra Johanne Selander Beställning: Länsstyrelsen Skåne Samhällsbyggnad 205 15 Malmö Telefon 010-224 10 00 Copyright: Länsstyrelsen Skåne Diarienummer: 31140-2020-1 ISBN: 978-91-7675-205-0 Rapportnummer: 2020:26 (version 1, 2020-09-07) Illustrationer och grafik: Christoffer Nielsen Tryckår: 2020 Förord Denna rapport utgör ett analysunderlag till den gemensamma slutrapport som länsstyrelserna lämnar till energi- och digitaliseringsminister Anders Ygeman den 7 september 2020. Vårt arbete tar sin utgångspunkt i hur vi kan planera vår elförsörjning bättre och vad som behövs för att i framtiden undvika fler situationer där nyetableringar riskerar att nekas eller utbyggnad av klimatsmart infrastruktur skjuts på framtiden. Vi kan konstatera att medvetenheten hos kommuner, näringsliv och elnätsbolag ökat under de månader som analysarbetet genomförts. Avgörande faktorer är god samverkan, ett breddat perspektiv och en förståelse för varandras roller och ansvar. När energilandskapet förändras uppstår naturligen konflikter. Det kan till exempel handla om att mindre aktörer vill åstadkomma något där regelverken inte är i takt med tiden eller att en etablerad aktörs affärsmodell inte längre är lika lönsam. Det är i mötet mellan det nya – det småskaliga som växer nerifrån och upp – och det etablerade – det storskaliga och centraliserade – som det blir tydligt att energilandskapet är i förändring. På kort sikt kommer billig sol och vindkraft under gynnsamma väderförhållanden att konkurrera ut dyrare, men ofta mer planerbara, alternativ. Då uppstår ett behov av att göra avvägningar mellan politiska mål, att beakta olika tidsperspektiv, att beräkna kostnader och att reda ut ansvarsförhållanden.
    [Show full text]