DOCSLIB.ORG

D4.4 Landscape and Gap Analysis FINAL After QA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
D4.4 Landscape and Gap Analysis FINAL After QA Rights, Equality and Citizenship (REC) Programme of the European Commission (2014-2020) Monitoring and Detecting Online Hate Speech Version 1.1 D4.4 Landscape and Gap Analysis Abstract This is deliverable 4.4 for the Mandola project. This document focuses on the variety of ongoing initiatives (both EC funded and Non EC-funded, and profiles current activities in Europe and performs a brief Gap Analysis. Many countries are already supported by hotlines taking reports about hate speech through the INHOPE network and through other networks including INACH. However, some countries still do not have a structured response to hate speech or a method to handle complaints or reports about hate speech. For example, many members of the INHOPE network are from the area of children’s rights and have no mandate to respond to hate speech except in-so-far as they affect children. This report will highlight best practice in this field and through the gap analysis determine areas which MANDOLA will focus on. Contractual D ate of Delivery 30 Nov 201 6 Actual Date of Delivery 21 August 2017 Deliverable Security Class Public Editor Cormac Callanan <[email protected]> Contributors All MANDOLA partners Quality Assurance Marios Dikaiakos <[email protected]> MANDOLA D4.1 This project is implemented by the Mandola Consortium and funded by the Rights, Equality and Citizenship (REC) Programme of the European Commission. The MANDOLA consortium consists of: FORTH Coordinator Greece ACONITE Principal Contractor Ireland ICITA Principal Contractor Bulgaria INTHEMIS Principal Contractor France UAM Principal Contractor Spain UCY Principal Contractor Cyprus UM Principal Contractor France www.mandola-project.eu - 2 / 139 - August 2017 Document Revisions & Quality Assurance MANDOLA D4.1 Document Revisions & Quality Assurance Internal Reviewers 1. Marios Dikaiakos [email protected] 2. Evangelos Markatos [email protected] Revisions Version Date By Overview V1.1 20 -Aug -17 Editor, Aconite Updates an d edits to release Version 1. 1 Cormac Callanan V1.0 11-Aug -17 UCY, CY Quality Assurance Review Marios Dikaiakos V1.0 29 -Jun -17 Editor, Aconite Updates and edits to release Version 1.0 Cormac Callanan v1.1 27 -Jun -17 Estelle De Marco, Inthemis Reorganisation and contribution to the introduction, rewriting of sections relating to France V0.9 21 -Jun -17 Editor, Aconite Updates and edits to release Version 0.9 Cormac Callanan V0.9 1-May -17 University of Montpellier French content for Version 0.9 Adel Jomni Caroline Greco Christian Castane 0.8 18 -May -17 SPAIN: 1. part 3.3.4 of the document 1. Carlota Urruela 2. part 7.8 (Academia and Research) of the Spanish part 2. Marcos Hernando 3. part 5.6 (Government and Public 3. Carmen Jordá Institutions) and part 6.6 (Law Enforcement) of the Spanish part, and 4. Paloma Díaz proof-read 4. all sections of the Spanish part, and proof-read 0.8 22 -May -17 Albena Spasova Texts on Bulgaria Review/Edits on v0.8 Maya Boycheva- Manolcheva 0.8 18 -May -17 Maria Poveda Texts on Cy prus Review/Edits on v 0.8 0.8 5-May -17 Cormac Callanan First Drat Version Martin Smyth Dr. Aoife Duffy 0.4 16 -Feb -17 Editor, Aconite Draft outline Cormac Callanan www.mandola-project.eu - 3 / 139 - August 2017 Document Revisions & Quality Assurance MANDOLA D4.1 Table of Contents DOCUMENT REVISIONS & QUALITY ASSURANCE .................................................................................................... 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Target Audience .................................................................................................................................................................... 10 2 MANDOLA PROJECT OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Mandola Objectives ............................................................................................................................................................. 12 2.2 Mandola Innovations .......................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 Mandola Activities ................................................................................................................................................................ 13 3 OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.1 Insights ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Key themes .............................................................................................................................................................................. 19 3.3 Gaps Identified ....................................................................................................................................................................... 21 4 LANDSCAPE OF CURRENT INITIATIVES ............................................................................................................. 25 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................ 25 5 GOVERNMENT & PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS .......................................................................................................... 33 5.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................................... 33 5.2 BULGARIA ................................................................................................................................................................................ 34 5.3 CYPRUS ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 38 5.4 FRANCE ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 42 5.5 GREECE ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 48 5.6 IRELAND ................................................................................................................................................................................... 53 5.7 SPAIN ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 59 6 LAW ENFORCEMENT ................................................................................................................................................. 65 6.1 BULGARIA ................................................................................................................................................................................ 65 6.2 CYPRUS ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 67 6.3 FRANCE ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 68 6.4 GREECE ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 71 6.5 IRELAND ................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 6.6 SPAIN ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 75 7 ACADEMIA/RESEARCH ............................................................................................................................................ 80 7.1 BULGARIA ................................................................................................................................................................................ 80 7.2 CYPRUS ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 82 7.3 FRANCE ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 83 7.4 GREECE ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 86 7.5 IRELAND
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.7.2021 SWD(2021) 710 Final
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.7.2021 SWD(2021) 710 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT 2021 Rule of Law Report Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Spain Accompanying the COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS 2021 Rule of Law Report The rule of law situation in the European Union {COM(2021) 700 final} - {SWD(2021) 701 final} - {SWD(2021) 702 final} - {SWD(2021) 703 final} - {SWD(2021) 704 final} - {SWD(2021) 705 final} - {SWD(2021) 706 final} - {SWD(2021) 707 final} - {SWD(2021) 708 final} - {SWD(2021) 709 final} - {SWD(2021) 711 final} - {SWD(2021) 712 final} - {SWD(2021) 713 final} - {SWD(2021) 714 final} - {SWD(2021) 715 final} - {SWD(2021) 716 final} - {SWD(2021) 717 final} - {SWD(2021) 718 final} - {SWD(2021) 719 final} - {SWD(2021) 720 final} - {SWD(2021) 721 final} - {SWD(2021) 722 final} - {SWD(2021) 723 final} - {SWD(2021) 724 final} - {SWD(2021) 725 final} - {SWD(2021) 726 final} - {SWD(2021) 727 final} EN EN ABSTRACT The Spanish justice system continues to face some challenges. In particular, the lack of renewal of the Council for the Judiciary persists in the absence of an agreement in Parliament to renew a number of constitutional bodies. A welcome development was the withdrawal of a proposed reform of the system for the selection of its judges-members that would have increased the perception of the Council as vulnerable to politicisation. In this context, calls were made for establishing a system of election of the judges-members of the Council by their peers in line with European standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Greta(2018)7
    G R E T A GROUP OF EXPERTS ON ACTION AGAINST TRAFFICKING IN HUMAN BEINGS GRETA(2018)7 Report concerning the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by Spain SECOND EVALUATION ROUND Adopted 23 March 2018 Published 20 June 2018 Secretariat of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings (GRETA and Committee of the Parties) Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex France [email protected] www.coe.int/en/web/anti-human-trafficking GRETA(2018)7 3 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table of contents Preamble ............................................................................................................................. 4 I. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 5 II. Main developments in the implementation of the Convention by Spain ........................ 7 1. Emerging trends in trafficking in human beings ......................................................... 7 2. Developments in the legal framework ........................................................................ 8 3. Developments in the institutional framework ............................................................ 9 4. National Action Plan ................................................................................................. 12 5. Training of relevant professionals ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 069977/EU XXVII.GP Eingelangt Am 22/07/21
    069977/EU XXVII.GP Eingelangt am 22/07/21 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.7.2021 SWD(2021) 710 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT 2021 Rule of Law Report Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Spain Accompanying the COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS 2021 Rule of Law Report The rule of law situation in the European Union {COM(2021) 700 final} - {SWD(2021) 701 final} - {SWD(2021) 702 final} - {SWD(2021) 703 final} - {SWD(2021) 704 final} - {SWD(2021) 705 final} - {SWD(2021) 706 final} - {SWD(2021) 707 final} - {SWD(2021) 708 final} - {SWD(2021) 709 final} - {SWD(2021) 711 final} - {SWD(2021) 712 final} - {SWD(2021) 713 final} - {SWD(2021) 714 final} - {SWD(2021) 715 final} - {SWD(2021) 716 final} - {SWD(2021) 717 final} - {SWD(2021) 718 final} - {SWD(2021) 719 final} - {SWD(2021) 720 final} - {SWD(2021) 721 final} - {SWD(2021) 722 final} - {SWD(2021) 723 final} - {SWD(2021) 724 final} - {SWD(2021) 725 final} - {SWD(2021) 726 final} - {SWD(2021) 727 final} EN EN www.parlament.gv.at ABSTRACT The Spanish justice system continues to face some challenges. In particular, the lack of renewal of the Council for the Judiciary persists in the absence of an agreement in Parliament to renew a number of constitutional bodies. A welcome development was the withdrawal of a proposed reform of the system for the selection of its judges-members that would have increased the perception of the Council as vulnerable to politicisation.
    [Show full text]
  • From Ottawa to Sarajevo
    FROM OTTAWA TO SARAJEVO FROM OTTAWA TO SARAJEVO CANADIAN PEACEKEEPERS IN THE BALKANS Dawn M. Hewitt Centre for International Relations, Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada 1998 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Hewitt, Dawn M. From Ottawa to Sarajevo : Canadian peacekeepers in the Balkans (Martello papers ; 18) ISBN 0-88911-788-8 1. United Nations – Armed Forces. 2. United Nations – Canada. 3. Canada – Armed Forces – Bosnia and Hercegovina. 4. Canada – Armed Forces – Croatia. 5. Canada – Armed Forces – Yugoslavia. I. Queen’s University (Kingston, Ont.). Centre for International Relations. II. Title. III. Series. JX1981.P7H49 1997 355.3’57’0971 C97-932224-3 © Copyright 1998 Dedication To my parents, Msgt (ret) Norman E. Hewitt and Mrs Ruth Kane Hewitt The way of arms and arts as the way of the warrior is a constant precept that needs no detailing. Keep arts at your left side, arms by your right, the two must complement each other, without one the other can not be. Hojo Code The Martello Papers This is the eighteenth in a series of security studies published over the past several years by the Queen’s University Centre for International Relations (QCIR), under the general title of the Martello Papers. “From Ottawa to Sarajevo” is a detailed, empirical examination of Canadian participation in UN peacekeeping efforts in the former Yugoslavia between 1992 and 1995, written by a US Air Force officer, Major Dawn Hewitt, who served as Visiting Defence Fellow at the Centre during the 1996-97 academic year. Peacekeeping, by all accounts, has become increasingly complex since the end- ing of the Cold War, and as Major Hewitt’s monograph reveals, nowhere have those complexities and frustrations been more apparent than in the former Yugo- slavia.
    [Show full text]
  • Extortion in Spain
    Extortion in Spain thE Economic contExt Spain’s economy is the 14th largest in the world and 5th largest in the European Union in nominal GDP terms. The country is listed 23rd in the UN’s Human Development Index and 30th in GDP (PPP) per capita as stated by the World Bank, making it a high income economy and situated among the countries of very high human development. Spain has been suffering from an extended economic crisis from 2007 to 2014, which has had a great impact on the labour market as well as on the whole economy. The economic slump significantly reduced imports and increased, while the country kept attracting a growing number of foreign tourists. As a result, its trade balance in goods and services reached almost a 6 % deficit of GDP in 2007 and achieved a surplus in 2012 for the first time since 1997. Figure 1. Tourism in the overall trade balance in goods and services (% GDp) .ETßINßGOODSßANDßSERVICES %XPORTSßEXCEPTß4OURISM )MPORTSßEXCEPTß4OURISM 4OURISM ßREVENUE 4OURISM ßEXPENDITUREß Source: Statistic bulletin of Banco de España, 2015. Extortion in Spain In November 2015, OECD’s economic forecast stated: “A robust economy recovery in Spain is projected to continue into 2016 and 2017, throughout a gradually slowing pace as the positive impact of the depreciation of the euro, and lower oil and other commodity prices, dissipate. Low borrowing rates of business and households will also continue to provide support together with the fiscal stance, which is expected to be mildly expansionary over the past two years. These factors, together with the implementation of significant structural reforms, are increasing business confidence” (OECD, 2015: 1).
    [Show full text]
  • The Plan for Kosovo – Keeping Kosovo in Serbia by Changing the Ethnic Composition in Favour of Serbs
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The unfinished trial of Slobodan Milošević: Justice lost, history told Vrkić, N. Publication date 2015 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Vrkić, N. (2015). The unfinished trial of Slobodan Milošević: Justice lost, history told. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:01 Oct 2021 I wonder what your objective here is, and why are you saying or how you dare say that Kosovo borders with Serbia? Kosovo does not border with Serbia. Kosovo is Serbia. Slobodan Milošević, Opening Statement, 14 February 2002 Chapter VIII: The Plan for Kosovo – Keeping Kosovo in Serbia by Changing the Ethnic Composition in Favour of Serbs The Kosovo indictment alleged that, from 1 January 1999 to 20 June 1999, Milošević was a participant in a Joint Criminal Enterprise, the purpose of which was to expel a significant number of Kosovo Albanians from Kosovo in order to ensure Serb control of the province.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation Report Es
    008894/EU XXVI. GP Eingelangt am 23/01/18 Council of the European Union Brussels, 23 January 2018 (OR. en) 12660/12 DCL 1 GENVAL 53 DECLASSIFICATION of document: ST12660/12 RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED dated: 19 September 2012 new status: Public Subject: EVALUATION REPORT ON THE FIFTH ROUND OF MUTUAL EVALUATIONS "FINANCIAL CRIME AND FINANCIAL INVESTIGATIONS" REPORT ON SPAIN . Delegations will find attached the declassified version of the above document. The text of this document is identical to the previous version. 12660/12 DCL 1 /dl DGF 2C EN www.parlament.gv.at RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED COUNCIL OF Brussels, 19 September 2012 THE EUROPEAN UNION 12660/12 RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED GENVAL 53 EVALUATION REPORT ON THE FIFTH ROUND OF MUTUAL EVALUATIONS "FINANCIAL CRIME AND FINANCIAL INVESTIGATIONS" REPORT ON SPAIN 12660/12 PN/ec 1 DGD 2B RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED EN www.parlament.gv.at RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 5 2 NATIONAL SYSTEM AND CRIMINAL POLICY ........................................... 7 2.1 SPECIALIZED UNITS ............................................................................................ 7 2.1.1 Investigative authorities ................................................................................ 7 2.1.2 Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) ................................................................ 10 2.1.3 Asset Recovery Office (ARO) and other similar bodies ............................
    [Show full text]
  • Jonathan Gray
    DEAD MEN’S SECRETS Tantalising Hints of a Lost Super Race By JONATHAN GRAY © 2004 by Jonathan Gray. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the author. First published by AuthorHouse 04/07/04 ISBN: 1-4140-3749-X (e-book) ISBN: 1-4184-2555-9 (Paperback) ISBN: 1-4184-2556-7 (Dust Jacket) Printed in the United States of America Bloomington, Indiana This book is printed on acid free paper. DEDICATION To that courageous band of prehistorians who have dared to say publicly what many others have known in their hearts—that their emperor has nothing on. iii iv CONTENTS PROLOGUE ............................................................................................... ix PART ONE: HOW AN ORGINAL SUPER WORLD VANISHED ......................................................................... 1 1. THE DAY THE EARTH TIPPED OVER ....................................... 3 (How a worldwide super culture vanished in a cosmic disaster) 2. SEARCH ........................................................................................ 11 (Why the first cities suddenly hatched out of nowhere, fully mature) 3. MYSTERIOUS MESSAGES IN THE CANYON......................... 23 (How somebody mapped our whole planet before “history” began) 4. OPERATION SPIDER WEB......................................................... 35 (An incredible electric web that gave one city world control) 5. SUDDEN
    [Show full text]
  • Delitos Económicos
    06-19 ESCRITURA 114:62escritura 06-13 5/12/18 10:09 Página 6 6| Escritura PÚBLICA | noviembre-diciembre 2018 | EN EL ESCAPARATE | IN THE SPOTLIGHT Delitos económicos: Inauguración. De izda. a dcha.: José la colaboración del Notariado Ángel Martínez Sanchiz, Pedro Garrido y José Marqueño. en su prevención y persecución Initial XPERTOS DE LAS PRINCIPALES instituciones inter‐ rrorismo, el blanqueo de capitales o el fraude fiscal, en‐ conference nacionales, como Naciones Unidas, la Comisión Eu‐ tre otros. (left to right): E ropea, el Grupo de Acción Financiera Internacional Por parte española participaron miembros de la Poli‐ José Ángel Martínez (de Latinoamérica), la Oficina Europea de Lucha contra el cía Nacional, Guardia Civil, Audiencia Nacional, SEPBLAC, Sanchiz, Pedro Fraude, o Europol debatieron sobre cómo intensificar y Fiscalías Especiales Anticorrupción y Antidroga, Aduanas, Garrido, and José sistematizar la colaboración de los notarios en la preven‐ Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores, Agencia Marqueño. ción y lucha contra delitos como la financiación del te‐ Estatal de Administración Tributaria, Tribunal de Cuen‐ in English Crimes of a financial Experts from major international institutions preventing and combating crimes such as such as the United Nations, the European terrorist financing, money laundering, and nature: Collaboration Commission, the Financial Action Task Force tax fraud, among others.. of the Notariat in of Latin America, the European Anti-Fraud Spanish engagement included members Office, and Europol discussed ways to step of the National Police, Civil Guard, National Prevention and up and systematize notarial collaboration in High Court, the SEPBLAC money laundering Prosecution At the end of November, the Madrid headquarters of the General Council of the Spanish Notariat (CGN) hosted the international forum Economic Crimes: Collaboration of the Notariat in Prevention and Prosecution, organized by the host institution and the International Union of Notaries (UINL), representing notaries from 88 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Assistance to Victims
    T-ES(2018)38_bil rev. 01/04/2019 LANZAROTE COMMITTEE / COMITE DE LANZAROTE Compilation of Replies to Question 6 (Assistance to victims) of the Thematic Questionnaire on the protection of children against sexual exploitation and sexual abuse facilitated by information and communication technologies (ICTs) Compilation des réponses à la Question 6 (Assistance aux victimes) du Questionnaire Thématique sur la protection des enfants contre l'exploitation et les abus sexuels facilités par les technologies de l'information et de la communication (TIC) Question 6. Assistance to victims 6.1. What specific reporting mechanisms, including helplines, are in place to ensure that child victims of exposure online of: a. self-generated sexually explicit images and/or videos are provided with the necessary support, assistance and psychological help? b. self-generated sexual content are provided with the necessary support, assistance and psychological help? 6.2. What legislative or other measures have been taken to ensure that child victims of online exposure of: a. self-generated sexually explicit images and/or videos are provided with the necessary support, assistance and psychological help? b. self-generated sexual content are provided with the necessary support, assistance and psychological help? → Please provide, if any, information on the number of victims who received support, assistance and psychological help in the above mentioned specific contexts (questions 6.1 and 6.2). Question 6. Assistance aux victimes 6.1. Quels mécanismes de signalement et/ou services d’assistance téléphonique ont été mis en place pour veiller à ce que les enfants victimes d’une exposition en ligne à : a. des images et/ou des vidéos sexuellement explicites autoproduites puissent bénéficier de l’aide, de l’assistance et du soutien psychologique nécessaires ? b.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal Brief
    IT-04-74-A 18659 A18659 - A18459 29 July 2015 MB THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-04-74-A Before: Judge Theodor Meron, Presiding Judge Carmel Agius Judge Fausto Pocar Judge Liu Daqun Judge Bakone Justice Moloto Registrar: Mr. John Hocking Date filed: 29 July 2015 THE PROSECUTOR v. JADRANKO PRLIĆ BRUNO STOJIĆ SLOBODAN PRALJAK MILIVOJ PETKOVIĆ VALENTIN ĆORIĆ BERISLAV PUŠIĆ PUBLIC JADRANKO PRLIĆ’S NOTICE OF RE-FILING OF PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION OF JADRANKO PRLIĆ’S APPEAL BRIEF Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Douglas Stringer Mr. Mathias Marcussen Counsel for the Accused: Mr. Michael G. Karnavas and Ms. Suzana Tomanović for Jadranko Prlić Ms. Senka Nožica and Mr. Karim A. A. Khan for Bruno Stojić Ms. Nika Pinter and Ms. Nataša Fauveau-Ivanović for Slobodan Praljak Ms. Vesna Alaburić and Mr. Guénaël Mettraux for Milivoj Petković Ms. Dijana Tomašegović-Tomić and Mr. Dražen Plavec for Valentin Ćorić Mr. Fahrudin Ibrišimović and Mr. Roger Sahota for Berislav Pušić IT-04-74-A 18658 THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-04-74-A PROSECUTOR V. JADRANKO PRLIĆ ET AL. PUBLIC JADRANKO PRLIĆ’S NOTICE OF RE-FILING OF PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION OF JADRANKO PRLIĆ’S APPEAL BRIEF Jadranko Prlić, through his Counsel (“the Defence”), hereby files this notice pursuant to the Appeals Chamber’s Decision on the Prosecution’s Urgent Motion to Reclassify Public Briefs and Modify the Public Redacted Briefing Schedule dated 8 July 2015. Dated: 29 July 2015 Respectfully Submitted, The Hague, Netherlands _____________________ Michael G. Karnavas Counsel for Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Crime and Financial Investigations"
    Council of the European Union Brussels, 23 January 2018 (OR. en) 12660/12 DCL 1 GENVAL 53 DECLASSIFICATION of document: ST12660/12 RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED dated: 19 September 2012 new status: Public Subject: EVALUATION REPORT ON THE FIFTH ROUND OF MUTUAL EVALUATIONS "FINANCIAL CRIME AND FINANCIAL INVESTIGATIONS" REPORT ON SPAIN . Delegations will find attached the declassified version of the above document. The text of this document is identical to the previous version. 12660/12 DCL 1 /dl DGF 2C EN RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED COUNCIL OF Brussels, 19 September 2012 THE EUROPEAN UNION 12660/12 RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED GENVAL 53 EVALUATION REPORT ON THE FIFTH ROUND OF MUTUAL EVALUATIONS "FINANCIAL CRIME AND FINANCIAL INVESTIGATIONS" REPORT ON SPAIN 12660/12 PN/ec 1 DGD 2B RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED EN RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 5 2 NATIONAL SYSTEM AND CRIMINAL POLICY ........................................... 7 2.1 SPECIALIZED UNITS ............................................................................................ 7 2.1.1 Investigative authorities ................................................................................ 7 2.1.2 Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) ................................................................ 10 2.1.3 Asset Recovery Office (ARO) and other similar bodies ............................. 11 2.1.4 Judicial authorities .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]