DOCSLIB.ORG

Jadranko Prlić's Final Brief

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jadranko Prlić's Final Brief IT-04-74-T 69939 D69939 - D69743 29 March 2011 TR THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-04-74-T Before: Judge Jean-Claude Antonetti, Presiding Judge Arpad Prandler Judge Stefan Trechsel Reserve Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua Registrar: Mr. John Hocking Date filed: 29 March 2011 THE PROSECUTOR v. JADRANKO PRLIĆ BRUNO STOJIĆ SLOBODAN PRALJAK MILIVOJ PETKOVIĆ VALENTIN ĆORIĆ BERISLAV PUŠIĆ REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION JADRANKO PRLIĆ’S FINAL BRIEF Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Kenneth Scott Mr. Douglas Stringer Counsel for the Accused: Mr. Michael G. Karnavas and Ms. Suzana Tomanović for Jadranko Prlić Ms. Senka Nožica and Mr. Karim A. A. Khan for Bruno Stojić Mr. Božidar Kovačić and Ms. Nika Pinter for Slobodan Praljak Ms. Vesna Alaburić and Mr. Z. Ivanišević for Milivoj Petković Ms. Dijana Tomašegović-Tomić and Mr. Dražen Plavec for Valentin Ćorić Mr. Fahrudin Ibrišimović and Mr. Roger Sahota for Berislav Pušić 69938 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................... 1 II. STANDARD OF PROOF........................................................................................... 3 A.Presumption of innocence and proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt................... 3 B.No adverse inference can be drawn from the silence of the Accused....................... 5 III. DR. JADRANKO PRLIĆ’S BACKGROUND......................................................... 6 IV. INDIVIDUAL CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY UNDER ARTICLE 7(1) ........ 12 A. Joint Criminal Enterprise (“JCE”) ........................................................................... 12 i. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 12 ii. JCE III is not customary international law............................................................ 13 iii. It is proper to raise the question of JCE’s applicability at this stage ................... 15 iv. The Trial Chamber may depart from the findings of the Tadić Appeals Chamber on this issue................................................................................................ 16 v. If JCE is found to be applicable, it must be interpreted restrictively .................... 17 B. Other modes of liability under Article 7(1).............................................................. 17 i. Planning.................................................................................................................. 18 ii. Instigating.............................................................................................................. 18 iii. Ordering ............................................................................................................... 18 iv. Committing........................................................................................................... 18 v. Otherwise Aiding and Abetting............................................................................. 19 1. Aiding and abetting through a positive act............................................................ 19 2. Aiding and abetting by omission........................................................................... 19 3. Aiding and abetting by omission proper................................................................ 20 4. Aiding and abetting by tacit approval and encouragement ................................... 20 V. RESPONSIBILITY OF CIVILIAN SUPERIORS UNDER ARTICLE 7(3) ...... 21 A. Existence of a superior-subordinate relationship..................................................... 21 B. The superior knew or had reason to know that the criminal act was about to be or had been committed .............................................................................................. 22 C. Failure to take necessary or reasonable measures to prevent or punish ............... 24 VI. CONCURRENCE OF THE MODES OF INDIVIDUAL CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY................................................................................................... 25 VII. THE DEFENCE CASE .......................................................................................... 25 A. The importance of context .................................................................................... 25 B. The 1990 elections ................................................................................................ 26 C. Efforts of the internationals .................................................................................. 31 IT-04-74-T i 29 March 2011 69937 D. Rounds of negotiations ......................................................................................... 32 E. Improbability of Karađorđovo .............................................................................. 32 F. War breaks out between the SFRY and Croatia ................................................... 34 G. JNA attacks against Croatia & the UN/UNPROFOR Involvement...................... 35 H. BiH........................................................................................................................ 36 I. Decentralization and public service delivery at the municipal and regional level in BiH before the war................................................................................................ 38 J. The importance of the Social Accounting Office (SDK)...................................... 39 K. The impact of the war on BiH............................................................................... 39 L. Elections in Bosnia: what did the results mean?................................................... 41 M. Muslims secretly were organizing and planning for war.................................. 43 N. The beginning of regionalization.......................................................................... 44 O. The birth of the HZ HB......................................................................................... 46 P. Preparations for the referendum............................................................................ 47 Q. HVO establishment on 8 April 1992 .................................................................... 50 R. Graz....................................................................................................................... 51 S. The Statutory Decision of 15 May 1992............................................................... 53 T. Statutory Decision of 13 June 1992.......................................................................... 54 U. The development of regionalization ..................................................................... 56 V. Dr. Prlić’s involvement with the Mostar Special Purpose Council ...................... 56 W. HZ HB Presidency meeting dated 3 July 1992 ....................................................... 59 X. Friendship and Cooperation Agreement dated 21 July 1992................................ 63 Y. 14 August 1992 ........................................................................................................ 65 Z. Dr. Prlić’s interview – 17 August 1992 ................................................................ 70 AA. London Conference (26-28 August 1992) ............................................................ 73 BB. 17 September 1992 ................................................................................................ 74 CC. 17 October 1992 .................................................................................................... 77 DD. HDZ Convention in November 1992.................................................................... 81 EE. General remarks on the responsibility and work of the HVO HZ HB................... 82 FF. The relationship between the HVO HZ HB and the Presidency............................ 87 GG. The relationship between the HVO HZ HB and the municipalities...................... 89 HH. The Department of Finance................................................................................... 91 II. The Department of General Administration and Justice.......................................... 96 JJ. Institutions Concerning Refugees.......................................................................... 104 KK. The Department of Defence................................................................................ 114 LL. Prisons & Detentions Facilities............................................................................ 119 MM. 15 January 1993................................................................................................. 122 NN. Okruzy (districts) (March 1993).......................................................................... 131 OO. Međugorje ........................................................................................................... 134 PP. The Croatian Republic of Herceg-Bosna (HR HB).............................................. 136 QQ. Washington Agreement and the establishment of the Federation....................... 139 RR. The Mladić Notebooks ........................................................................................ 139 i. Exhibit P11376 - Mladić Notebook entry 5 October 1992............................. 139 ii. Exhibit P11377 - Mladić Notebook entry 6 October 1992............................. 141 iii. Exhibit P11380 - Mladić Notebook entry 26 October 1992........................... 142 iv. Exhibit P11388 - Mladić Notebook entry 31 January 1994 ........................... 144 v. Exhibit P11389 - Mladić Notebook entry
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The War in Bosnia and Herzegovina Or the Unacceptable Lightness of “Historicism”
    The War in Bosnia and Herzegovina Or the Unacceptable Lightness of “Historicism” Davor Marijan War Museum, Zagreb, Republic of Croatia Abstract The author in this study does not intend to provide a comprehensive account of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in part because the cur- rent level of research does not enable this. The only way to understand this conflict is through facts, not prejudices. However, such prejudices are particularly acute amongst Muslim-Bosniac authors. They base their claims on the notion that Serbs and Croats are the destroyers of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and that both are equally culpable in its destruction. Relying on mainly unpublished and uncited documents from the three constitutive nations of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the author factually chal- lenges basic and generally accepted claims. The author offers alternative responses to certain claims and draws attention to the complexity of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which has been mainly viewed in terms of black or white. The author does, however, suggest that in considering the character of the war it is necessary to examine first the war in Croatia and the inter-relationship between the two. The main focus is on 1992 and the Muslim and Croat differences that developed into open conflict at the beginning of 1993. The role of the international community in the war and the partition of Bosnia and Herzegovina are also discussed. At the end of the 20th century in Europe and the eclipse of Communism from the world political scene, it is not easy to trace the indelible marks left behind after the collapse of Yugoslavia and the wars that ensued.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural-Urban Differences and the Break-Up of Yugoslavia L’Opposition Ville-Campagne Et La Dissolution De La Yougoslavie
    Balkanologie Revue d'études pluridisciplinaires Vol. VI, n° 1-2 | 2002 Volume VI Numéro 1-2 Rural-urban differences and the break-up of Yugoslavia L’opposition ville-campagne et la dissolution de la Yougoslavie John B. Allcock Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/balkanologie/447 DOI: 10.4000/balkanologie.447 ISSN: 1965-0582 Publisher Association française d'études sur les Balkans (Afebalk) Printed version Date of publication: 1 December 2002 Number of pages: 101-125 ISSN: 1279-7952 Electronic reference John B. Allcock, « Rural-urban differences and the break-up of Yugoslavia », Balkanologie [Online], Vol. VI, n° 1-2 | 2002, Online since 04 February 2009, connection on 17 December 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/balkanologie/447 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/balkanologie.447 © Tous droits réservés Balkanologie VI (1-2), décembre 2002, p. 101-125 \ 101 RURAL-URBAN DIFFERENCES AND THE BREAK-UP OF YUGOSLAVIA* John B. Allcock* INTRODUCTION There has been widespread debate over the possible causes of the break­ up of the former Yugoslav federation, encompassing a broad choice of political, economic and cultural factors within the country, as well as aspects of its in­ ternational setting, which might be considered to have undermined the in­ tegrity of the state. Relatively little attention has been paid, however, to the importance of rural-urban differences in the development of these social and political conflicts. I set it out in this paper to remind the reader of the impor­ tance of this dimension of the disintegration of the former Yugoslavia, al­ though within the format of a brief article it is possible to do no more than il­ lustrate a hypothesis which will certainly require more rigorous empirical examination.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacy Support Person Registration of Respondent
    BEFORE THE IOWA BOARD OF PHARMACY Re: Case No. 2011-172 Pharmacy Support Person Registration of STATEMENT OF CHARGES TYLERANTHONY SMITH Registration No. 792, Respondent COMES NOW, the Complainant, Lloyd K. Jessen, and states: 1. He is the Executive Director ofthe Iowa Board ofPharmacy and files this Statement ofCharges solely in his official capacity. 2. The Board has jurisdiction in this matter pursuant to Iowa Code Chapters 147,155A and 272C (2011). 3. The Board issued Tyler Anthony Smith (hereinafter, "Respondent") pharmacy support person registration number 792, subject to the laws of the State ofIowa and the rules ofthe Board. Respondent's registration was last renewed on July 12, 2010, and will expire on June 30, 2012. 4. At all times material to this Statement ofCharges, Respondent was employed as a pharmacy support person at Hy-Vee Pharmacy, Perry, Iowa. A. CHARGES COUNT I- UNLAWFUL POSSESSION AND DISTRIBUTION OF DRUGS Respondent is charged pursuant to Iowa Code §§ 124.403, i55A.6B(s) and 155A.21 (2011), and 657 Iowa Administrative Code § 36.i(4)(h), with possession and distribution of a prescription drugs - specifically, controlled substances - for other than lawful purposes. COUNT II - VIOLATING LAWS RELATED TO PHARMACY Respondent is charged pursuant to Iowa Code § 155A.6B(5) (2011) and 657 Iowa Administrative Code § 36.i(4)(j) with violating state laws related to the practice of pharmacy; specifically, laws relating to possession and distribution ofcontrolled substances found at Iowa Code §§ 124.403,155A.21 and 155A.23 (2011). COUNT III - INABILITY TO PRACTICE DUE TO CHEMICAL ABUSE Respondent is charged pursuant to Iowa Code § i55A.6B(s) (2011), and 657 Iowa Administrative Code § 36.1(4X111) with the inability to practice as a pharmacy support person, with reasonable skill and safety, due to chemical abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of VANCOUVER RESOLUTION July 7, 2008
    CITY OF VANCOUVER RESOLUTION July 7, 2008 RESOLUTION NO. fl-&ha A RESOLUTION relating to selection of a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) for the Columbia River Crossing project (CRC), adauthorizing action by the City of Vancouver's delegates to the C-TRAN Board and Regional Transportation Council Board, guided by the principles herein, in support of a regional LPA. WHEREAS, Interstate 5 is a conidor of national significance that serves the entire west coast of the United States, as well as international commerce with Canada, Mexico, and all of the countries of the Pacific Rim that access US west coast sea ports; and WHEREAS, Interstate 5 between Portland, Oregon and Vancouver, Washington experiences some of the worst congestion along the entire length of the Interstate 5 corridor; and WHEREAS, the 1-5 Interstate Bridge is one of only two Columbia River crossings between Vancouver, Washington and Portland, Oregon and approximately 138,000 people rely on crossing the 1-5 Bridge daily by car, transit, bicycle and on foot; and WHEREAS, the Vancouver-Portland Metropolitan Area is expected to grow by one million new residents by the year 2030; and WHEREAS, the existing 1-5 bridges ate old and do not meet current seismic hazard avoidance standards; and WHEREAS, the 1-5 Transportation and Trade Partnership Final Strategic Plan recommended congestion and mobility improvements within the 1-5 Bridge Influence Area in 2002; and WHEREAS, the Governors of Oregon and Washington initiated the Columbia River Crossing Project (CRC) and appointed a 39
    [Show full text]
  • When Can I Confirm an Arbitration Award?
    When Can I Confirm an Arbitration Award? June 01, 2021 Timeline to Confirm Arbitration Award BST Ohio Corp. v. Wolgang, 2021-Ohio-1785 In this appeal, the Supreme Court of Ohio reversed the lower court’s decision, holding that neither R.C. 2711.09 nor R.C. 2711.13 requires a court to wait three months after an arbitration award is issued before confirming the award. The Bullet Point: In this matter, the Supreme Court of Ohio determined that trial courts need not wait three months before confirming an arbitration award. In making this determination, the Court analyzed the interplay of the timing requirements of R.C. 2711.09 and 2711.13. Under R.C. 2711.09, a party may file an application to confirm an arbitration award with a court of common pleas within one year after the award is issued. Thereafter, the court must grant an order and issue judgment confirming said award unless it has been vacated, modified, or corrected pursuant to R.C. 2711.10 and 2711.11. As compared to said one-year limit to confirm, R.C. 2711.13 mandates that a party seeking to alter the results of arbitration must move to vacate, modify, or correct the award within three months of the award being issued. In this case, the plaintiff applied to the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court (the “trial court”) to confirm the arbitration award the same day it was issued. The following day, the defendant filed a petition to vacate or correct the award in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA v. YUGOSLAVIA) PKELIMINARY OBJECTIONS JUNE 1995 I TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS .............................. 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................... 3 FACTS ........................................... 7 1.1. Relevant facts from the past of Bosnia and Herzegovina ............................. 7 1.2. The creation of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes and the status of Muslims in that State . 11 1.3. Genocide committed against the Serbs in Bosnia and Herzegovina during the Second World War . 12 1.4. The stati~sof Muslims in Bosnia-Herzegovina in post-war socialist Yugoslavia ................ 20 1.5. The first cirisis in inter-ethnic relations in post-war socialist Yugoslavia ................ 23 1.6. The founding of parties in the Yugoslav Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1990 ............. 24 1.7. The first multiparty elections in Bosnia-Herzegovina . 36 1.8. Disagreement between the three leading parties over the future organization of Yugoslavia and Bosnia- Herzegovina in 1991 ...................... 38 1.9. The rebellion by members of the SDA and the HDZ in the republican government against the SFRY and pressures on the Serb people in Bosnia-Herzegovina (1 991 -1 992) ............................. 3": 1.10 . The emergence of new states in the territory of the former Yugoslav republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina . 72 1.1 1. The establishment of the Bosnian Serb Republic . 73 1.12. The establishment of the so-called Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina ....................... 77 1.13 . The establishment of Herzeg-Bosnia ........... 82 1.14 . The establishment of the Autonomous Province of Western Bosnia ......................
    [Show full text]
  • OHR RTRS News Summary, 13 December 1999
    OHR RTRS News Summary, 13 December 1999 News Headlines RS leaders hold consultative session on Brcko demilitarization, border service, draft Permanent Election Law and work of RS representatives in BiH institutions Radisic discusses reduction of military capacity and entity armies with SFOR Commander General Adams Adams visits Banja Luka Military Academy Tudjman buried in Zagreb Izetbegovic sends condolences to Tudjman family and Croat nation Jelavic regrets Izetbegovic and Radisic did not attend Tudjman funeral Jelavic meets with Croat leaders Pavletic and Matesa Former Yugoslav politician Stane Dolanc dies in Ljubljana World news Dodik discusses on China-RS economic relations with BiH Ambassador to China Mudrenovic Mudrenovic meets with RS Economic Chamber delegation RS Ministers Gligoric and Dragicevic visit Prijedor Gligoric and Dragicevic meet with Prijedor officials, Prijedor Veterans Society and Association of families of Fallen Soldiers and War Invalids to discuss housing problems Serb Orasje and Orasje officials agree on reconstruction of houses in Jenjic In Banja Luka, ICTY investigators question two RS Army officers on events in Srebrenica Boys attack Catholic priests in Derventa Jajce Citizens Forum sends protest letter to international organizations in BiH regarding Croat officials in Jajce 11 Serbs bring complaints to BiH Federation to Human House of Rights In Livno, those who hold housing rights bearers cannot sign agreement on purchase if they did not pay all credits Liberal Bosniak Organization condemns RTV BiH One body discovered
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Iv Bosnian Crisis: Post-Formation Problems and Issues Chapter Iv
    CHAPTER IV BOSNIAN CRISIS: POST-FORMATION PROBLEMS AND ISSUES CHAPTER IV BOSNIAN CRISIS : POST-FORMATION, PROBLEMS AND ISSUES Bosnia and ~erzegovina' located in the Balkans is surrounded by Croatia in the north and west and Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) in the east and south. A narrow strip of land gives Bosnia access to the Adriatic Sea. Ethnically, it is 40 per cent Muslims, 33 per cent Serbs and 18 per cent Croats and 9 per cent others. 2 [see map 11 The strength of Serb population in Bosnia and Herzegovina never reached majority since 1941, when there was a big massacre perpetrated by Croats. Since then, there has been an abrupt growth of muslim population and equally abrupt regression of the Serb and Croat population. In the 20 years period between 1961 ancl 1981 the number of Serbs in Bosnia was reduced by 05413. In I-oughly the same period the Muslim population got doubled so that for the first time since 1941 massacr'e they becamr t,he 1a1yt.st ethnic group in Bosnia and l3t~rrec~ovina. iZcrtr1~1iny to 1981 (-enslls thc Scr-LIS in Rosliia ill~tlHerz,t-1gC)virld dc~i.c~(lrlte~1 for 32.02 prr('.?nt, the' Yl~sliin~;I 3q5 I (,(.tit dr~d the, Cr (ILIIs for IR.4 v~r <.,.tit of t hr? pullI. Tn the ;t~tI t 11,. t trt~;jl nurnbc~~of Se1.11:; i r~r?.~iisetl11111 1 heir t~(?rC'crllr~(j~. Source: Keesing' s Rewrd of Mrld Events, 199 3. decreased so that according to 1991 census they accounted for only 31.33 percent of the total population.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POSAVINA BORDER REGION of CROATIA and BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA: DEVELOPMENT up to 1918 (With Special Reference to Changes in Ethnic Composition)
    THE POSAVINA BORDER REGION OF CROATIA AND BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA: DEVELOPMENT UP TO 1918 (with special reference to changes in ethnic composition) Ivan CRKVEN^I] Zagreb UDK: 94(497.5-3 Posavina)''15/19'':323.1 Izvorni znanstveni rad Primljeno: 9. 9. 2003. After dealing with the natural features and social importance of the Posavina region in the past, presented is the importance of this region as a unique Croatian ethnic territory during the Mid- dle Ages. With the appearance of the Ottomans and especially at the beginning of the 16th century, great ethnic changes oc- cured, primarily due to the expulsion of Croats and arrival of new ethnic groups, mostly Orthodox Vlachs and later Muslims and ethnic Serbs. With the withdrawal of the Ottomans from the Pannonian basin to the areas south of the Sava River and the Danube, the Sava becomes the dividing line creating in its border areas two socially and politically different environments: the Slavonian Military Frontier on the Slavonian side and the Otto- man military-frontier system of kapitanates on the Bosnian side. Both systems had a special influence on the change of ethnic composition in this region. With the withdrawal of the Ottomans further towards the southeast of Europe and the Austrian occu- pation of Bosnia and Herzegovina the Sava River remains the border along which, especially on the Bosnian side, further changes of ethnic structure occured. Ivan Crkven~i}, Ilo~ka 34, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia. E-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The research subject in this work is the border region Posavi- na between the Republic of Croatia and the Republic Bosnia- 293 -Herzegovina.
    [Show full text]
  • Deterring Wartime Atrocities Deterring Wartime Jacqueline R
    Deterring Wartime Atrocities Deterring Wartime Jacqueline R. Atrocities McAllister Hard Lessons from the Yugoslav Tribunal How can the interna- tional community deter government and rebel forces from committing atroc- ities against civilians? Long after liberated Nazi concentration camp survivors held up the ªrst sign declaring, “Never Again!” civilians have faced genocide during civil wars around the world, from Bangladesh to the former Yugoslavia, and more recently in northern Iraq. Sexual violence, torture, and forced dis- appearances are among the other horrors that civilians continue to endure in wartime. In the 1990s, international ofªcials sought to respond to such suffering by es- tablishing a new generation of wartime international criminal tribunals (ICTs), starting with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in 1993. The ICTY paved the way for the establishment of the perma- nent International Criminal Court (ICC) ªve years later. Unlike earlier ICTs in Nuremberg and Tokyo, as well as more recent war crimes tribunals in Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Cambodia, East Timor, Lebanon, Bosnia, and Kosovo, the ICTY and the ICC are mandated to prosecute international criminal law violations committed in the context of active armed conºicts. In granting the ICTY and the ICC such authority, their founders hoped that the tribu- nals would deter combatants in those conºicts from perpetrating violence against civilians.1 Nevertheless, more than twenty-ªve years after the ICTY opened its doors, international justice scholars continue to debate the role of wartime tribunals in deterring atrocities against civilians, particularly in ongoing conºicts. Skep- tics contend that, in the heat of battle, combatants are unlikely to perceive a Jacqueline R.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Proceedings of the Meetings of the Board Of
    OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF PORTAGE COUNTY, WISCONSIN January 18, 2005 February 15, 2005 March 15, 2005 April 19, 2005 May 17, 2005 June 29, 2005 July 19, 2005 August 16,2005 September 21,2005 October 18, 2005 November 8, 2005 December 20, 2005 O. Philip Idsvoog, Chair Richard Purcell, First Vice-Chair Dwight Stevens, Second Vice-Chair Roger Wrycza, County Clerk ATTACHED IS THE PORTAGE COUNTY BOARD PROCEEDINGS FOR 2005 WHICH INCLUDE MINUTES AND RESOLUTIONS ATTACHMENTS THAT ARE LISTED FOR RESOLUTIONS ARE AVAILABLE AT THE COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICE RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION TITLE JANUARY 18, 2005 77-2004-2006 ZONING ORDINANCE MAP AMENDMENT, CRUEGER PROPERTY 78-2004-2006 ZONING ORDINANCE MAP AMENDMENT, TURNER PROPERTY 79-2004-2006 HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NEW POSITION REQUEST FOR 2005-NON TAX LEVY FUNDED-PUBLIC HEALTH PLANNER (ADDITIONAL 20 HOURS/WEEK) 80-2004-2006 DIRECT LEGISLATION REFERENDUM ON CREATING THE OFFICE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE 81-2004-2006 ADVISORY REFERENDUM QUESTIONS DEALING WITH FULL STATE FUNDING FOR MANDATED STATE PROGRAMS REQUESTED BY WISCONSIN COUNTIES ASSOCIATION 82-2004-2006 SUBCOMMITTEE TO REVIEW AMBULANCE SERVICE AMENDED AGREEMENT ISSUES 83-2004-2006 MANAGEMENT REVIEW PROCESS TO IDENTIFY THE FUTURE DIRECTION TECHNICAL FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION OF PORTAGE COUNTY AMENDMENT GOVERNMENT 84-2004-2006 FINAL RESOLUTION FEBRUARY 15, 2005 85-2004-2006 ZONING ORDINANCE MAP AMENDMENT, WANTA PROPERTY 86-2004-2006 AUTHORIZING, APPROVING AND RATIFYING A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT INCLUDING GROUND
    [Show full text]
  • Final Resolution and Order Vs
    COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO PUERTO RICO ENERGY COMMISSION MARC BEJARANO CASE NO.: CEPR-RV-2017-0004 PETITIONER SUBJECT: FinAl Resolution And Order vs. AUTORIDAD DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA DE PUERTO RICO RESPONDENT FINAL RESOLUTION AND ORDER I. Brief ProcedurAl BAckground On February 27, 2017, Marc Bejarano (“Petitioner” or “Mr. Bejarano”) filed a petition for bill review before the Puerto Energy Commission (“Commission”) pursuAnt to Article 6.27 of Act 57-20141 and Regulation 8863.2 Mr. Bejarano’s petition relates to a past due charge included in A bill dated October 28, 2016 issued by the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) to Ms. Wendy CArroll PArker. On MArch 17, 2017, PREPA AppeAred before the Commission And requested an extension until April 10, 2017 to reply to Mr. BejArAno’s petition. The Commission grAnted PREPA’s request on MArch 20, 2017. On April 4, 2017, Mr. BejArAno filed A Motion requesting thAt the heAring in this case be conducted in the English language. The Commission grAnted the Petitioner’s request on April 5, 2017, pursuant to Section 1.10 of Regulation 8543.3 On April 10, 2017, PREPA filed A motion requesting the dismissAl of Mr. BejArAno’s petition. On April 19, 2017, the Commission held A hearing to Address: (1) whether it has jurisdiction to consider the dispute of the past due charges contested by the Petitioner; (2) whether there Are grounds to consider the present cAse As A complAint rAther thAn A petition for bill review, given PREPA having allegedly transferred the past due balance to the 1 The Puerto Rico Energy TrAnsformAtion And RELIEF Act, As Amended.
    [Show full text]