DOCSLIB.ORG

Assistance to Victims

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assistance to Victims T-ES(2018)38_bil rev. 01/04/2019 LANZAROTE COMMITTEE / COMITE DE LANZAROTE Compilation of Replies to Question 6 (Assistance to victims) of the Thematic Questionnaire on the protection of children against sexual exploitation and sexual abuse facilitated by information and communication technologies (ICTs) Compilation des réponses à la Question 6 (Assistance aux victimes) du Questionnaire Thématique sur la protection des enfants contre l'exploitation et les abus sexuels facilités par les technologies de l'information et de la communication (TIC) Question 6. Assistance to victims 6.1. What specific reporting mechanisms, including helplines, are in place to ensure that child victims of exposure online of: a. self-generated sexually explicit images and/or videos are provided with the necessary support, assistance and psychological help? b. self-generated sexual content are provided with the necessary support, assistance and psychological help? 6.2. What legislative or other measures have been taken to ensure that child victims of online exposure of: a. self-generated sexually explicit images and/or videos are provided with the necessary support, assistance and psychological help? b. self-generated sexual content are provided with the necessary support, assistance and psychological help? → Please provide, if any, information on the number of victims who received support, assistance and psychological help in the above mentioned specific contexts (questions 6.1 and 6.2). Question 6. Assistance aux victimes 6.1. Quels mécanismes de signalement et/ou services d’assistance téléphonique ont été mis en place pour veiller à ce que les enfants victimes d’une exposition en ligne à : a. des images et/ou des vidéos sexuellement explicites autoproduites puissent bénéficier de l’aide, de l’assistance et du soutien psychologique nécessaires ? b. des contenus à caractère sexuel autoproduits puissent bénéficier de l’aide, de l’assistance et du soutien psychologique nécessaires ? 6.2. Quelles mesures législatives ou autres ont été prises pour veiller à ce que les enfants victimes d’une exposition en ligne à : a. des images et/ou des vidéos sexuellement explicites autoproduites puissent bénéficier de l’aide, de l’assistance et du soutien psychologique nécessaires ? b. des contenus à caractère sexuel autoproduits puissent bénéficier de l’aide, de l’assistance et du soutien psychologique nécessaires ? → Veuillez indiquer, le cas échéant, le nombre de victimes ayant reçu une aide, une assistance et un soutien psychologiques dans les contextes particuliers évoqués ci-dessus (questions 6.1 et 6.2). 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS / TABLE DES MATIERES ALBANIA / ALBANIE ......................................................................................................... 5 ANDORRA / ANDORRE .................................................................................................... 7 AUSTRIA / AUTRICHE ....................................................................................................... 8 BELGIUM / BELGIQUE .................................................................................................... 11 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA / BOSNIE-HERZEGOVINE .................................................... 14 BULGARIA / BULGARIE .................................................................................................. 16 CROATIA / CROATIE ....................................................................................................... 18 CYPRUS / CHYPRE .......................................................................................................... 21 CZECH REPUBLIC / REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE ..................................................................... 23 DENMARK / DANEMARK ............................................................................................... 25 ESTONIA / ESTONIE ....................................................................................................... 26 FINLAND / FINLANDE ..................................................................................................... 29 FRANCE ......................................................................................................................... 32 GEORGIA / GEORGIE ...................................................................................................... 35 GERMANY / ALLEMAGNE .............................................................................................. 35 GREECE / GRECE ............................................................................................................ 38 HUNGARY / HONGRIE.................................................................................................... 40 ICELAND / ISLANDE ....................................................................................................... 45 ITALY / ITALIE ................................................................................................................ 46 LATVIA / LETTONIE ........................................................................................................ 48 LIECHTENSTEIN .............................................................................................................. 56 LITHUANIA / LITUANIE................................................................................................... 58 LUXEMBOURG ............................................................................................................... 59 MALTA / MALTE ............................................................................................................ 60 REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA / REPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA .................................................. 61 MONACO ...................................................................................................................... 63 MONTENEGRO .............................................................................................................. 64 NETHERLANDS / PAYS-BAS ............................................................................................ 66 NORTH MACEDONIA / MACEDOINE DU NORD ............................................................... 67 NORWAY / NORVEGE .................................................................................................... 68 3 POLAND / POLOGNE ...................................................................................................... 69 PORTUGAL .................................................................................................................... 70 ROMANIA / ROUMANIE ................................................................................................ 72 RUSSIAN FEDERATION / FEDERATION DE RUSSIE ........................................................... 73 SAN MARINO / SAINT-MARIN ........................................................................................ 74 SERBIA / SERBIE ............................................................................................................ 74 SLOVAK REPUBLIC / REPUBLIQUE DE SLOVAQUIE .......................................................... 77 SLOVENIA / SLOVENIE ................................................................................................... 79 SPAIN / ESPAGNE .......................................................................................................... 82 SWEDEN / SUEDE .......................................................................................................... 84 SWITZERLAND / SUISSE ................................................................................................. 85 TURKEY / TURQUIE ........................................................................................................ 87 UKRAINE ....................................................................................................................... 88 4 COMPILATION 1 of replies / des réponses ALBANIA / ALBANIE State replies / Réponses de l’Etat Question 6.1.a. and b. The Law 18/2017 “On the Rights and protection of the child” has introduced the obligation of everyone to report cases of abuse and violence against children, even when there is a reasonable doubt. The obligation is for the whole public, however it is more specifically directed to professionals, who may incur penalties if failing to report such cases. The National Platform for Child Safety Online (www.ISIGURT.al) is a tool for reporting illegal or unsafe content for children and young people or any incidents. The National Platform is accompanied by a Mobile App (called ISIGURT) that has direct links to reporting incidents or calling directly child helpline services. ALO 116-111 (the Albanian National Child Helpline) provides free of charge 24/7 access to children and young people to report any incidence or ask for information on internet safety, personal safety etc. A counselling website has been launched in 2016: www.nukjevetem.al where children and young people can seek advice on issues that concern them. The State Agency for the Protection of Children’s Rights has established memorandum of understanding and protocols with both these services (helpline and website) to ensure timely end effective reporting to authorities of cases of child abuse. The State Agency for the Protection of Children's Rights signed in April 2016 the cooperation agreement with the National Children's Counseling Line Alo 116 111. This agreement aims to improve the referral system for children at risk, through increased cross-sector co- operation and co-ordination work between public and non-public structures.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.7.2021 SWD(2021) 710 Final
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.7.2021 SWD(2021) 710 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT 2021 Rule of Law Report Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Spain Accompanying the COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS 2021 Rule of Law Report The rule of law situation in the European Union {COM(2021) 700 final} - {SWD(2021) 701 final} - {SWD(2021) 702 final} - {SWD(2021) 703 final} - {SWD(2021) 704 final} - {SWD(2021) 705 final} - {SWD(2021) 706 final} - {SWD(2021) 707 final} - {SWD(2021) 708 final} - {SWD(2021) 709 final} - {SWD(2021) 711 final} - {SWD(2021) 712 final} - {SWD(2021) 713 final} - {SWD(2021) 714 final} - {SWD(2021) 715 final} - {SWD(2021) 716 final} - {SWD(2021) 717 final} - {SWD(2021) 718 final} - {SWD(2021) 719 final} - {SWD(2021) 720 final} - {SWD(2021) 721 final} - {SWD(2021) 722 final} - {SWD(2021) 723 final} - {SWD(2021) 724 final} - {SWD(2021) 725 final} - {SWD(2021) 726 final} - {SWD(2021) 727 final} EN EN ABSTRACT The Spanish justice system continues to face some challenges. In particular, the lack of renewal of the Council for the Judiciary persists in the absence of an agreement in Parliament to renew a number of constitutional bodies. A welcome development was the withdrawal of a proposed reform of the system for the selection of its judges-members that would have increased the perception of the Council as vulnerable to politicisation. In this context, calls were made for establishing a system of election of the judges-members of the Council by their peers in line with European standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Greta(2018)7
    G R E T A GROUP OF EXPERTS ON ACTION AGAINST TRAFFICKING IN HUMAN BEINGS GRETA(2018)7 Report concerning the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by Spain SECOND EVALUATION ROUND Adopted 23 March 2018 Published 20 June 2018 Secretariat of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings (GRETA and Committee of the Parties) Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex France [email protected] www.coe.int/en/web/anti-human-trafficking GRETA(2018)7 3 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table of contents Preamble ............................................................................................................................. 4 I. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 5 II. Main developments in the implementation of the Convention by Spain ........................ 7 1. Emerging trends in trafficking in human beings ......................................................... 7 2. Developments in the legal framework ........................................................................ 8 3. Developments in the institutional framework ............................................................ 9 4. National Action Plan ................................................................................................. 12 5. Training of relevant professionals ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 069977/EU XXVII.GP Eingelangt Am 22/07/21
    069977/EU XXVII.GP Eingelangt am 22/07/21 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.7.2021 SWD(2021) 710 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT 2021 Rule of Law Report Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Spain Accompanying the COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS 2021 Rule of Law Report The rule of law situation in the European Union {COM(2021) 700 final} - {SWD(2021) 701 final} - {SWD(2021) 702 final} - {SWD(2021) 703 final} - {SWD(2021) 704 final} - {SWD(2021) 705 final} - {SWD(2021) 706 final} - {SWD(2021) 707 final} - {SWD(2021) 708 final} - {SWD(2021) 709 final} - {SWD(2021) 711 final} - {SWD(2021) 712 final} - {SWD(2021) 713 final} - {SWD(2021) 714 final} - {SWD(2021) 715 final} - {SWD(2021) 716 final} - {SWD(2021) 717 final} - {SWD(2021) 718 final} - {SWD(2021) 719 final} - {SWD(2021) 720 final} - {SWD(2021) 721 final} - {SWD(2021) 722 final} - {SWD(2021) 723 final} - {SWD(2021) 724 final} - {SWD(2021) 725 final} - {SWD(2021) 726 final} - {SWD(2021) 727 final} EN EN www.parlament.gv.at ABSTRACT The Spanish justice system continues to face some challenges. In particular, the lack of renewal of the Council for the Judiciary persists in the absence of an agreement in Parliament to renew a number of constitutional bodies. A welcome development was the withdrawal of a proposed reform of the system for the selection of its judges-members that would have increased the perception of the Council as vulnerable to politicisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Extortion in Spain
    Extortion in Spain thE Economic contExt Spain’s economy is the 14th largest in the world and 5th largest in the European Union in nominal GDP terms. The country is listed 23rd in the UN’s Human Development Index and 30th in GDP (PPP) per capita as stated by the World Bank, making it a high income economy and situated among the countries of very high human development. Spain has been suffering from an extended economic crisis from 2007 to 2014, which has had a great impact on the labour market as well as on the whole economy. The economic slump significantly reduced imports and increased, while the country kept attracting a growing number of foreign tourists. As a result, its trade balance in goods and services reached almost a 6 % deficit of GDP in 2007 and achieved a surplus in 2012 for the first time since 1997. Figure 1. Tourism in the overall trade balance in goods and services (% GDp) .ETßINßGOODSßANDßSERVICES %XPORTSßEXCEPTß4OURISM )MPORTSßEXCEPTß4OURISM 4OURISM ßREVENUE 4OURISM ßEXPENDITUREß Source: Statistic bulletin of Banco de España, 2015. Extortion in Spain In November 2015, OECD’s economic forecast stated: “A robust economy recovery in Spain is projected to continue into 2016 and 2017, throughout a gradually slowing pace as the positive impact of the depreciation of the euro, and lower oil and other commodity prices, dissipate. Low borrowing rates of business and households will also continue to provide support together with the fiscal stance, which is expected to be mildly expansionary over the past two years. These factors, together with the implementation of significant structural reforms, are increasing business confidence” (OECD, 2015: 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation Report Es
    008894/EU XXVI. GP Eingelangt am 23/01/18 Council of the European Union Brussels, 23 January 2018 (OR. en) 12660/12 DCL 1 GENVAL 53 DECLASSIFICATION of document: ST12660/12 RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED dated: 19 September 2012 new status: Public Subject: EVALUATION REPORT ON THE FIFTH ROUND OF MUTUAL EVALUATIONS "FINANCIAL CRIME AND FINANCIAL INVESTIGATIONS" REPORT ON SPAIN . Delegations will find attached the declassified version of the above document. The text of this document is identical to the previous version. 12660/12 DCL 1 /dl DGF 2C EN www.parlament.gv.at RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED COUNCIL OF Brussels, 19 September 2012 THE EUROPEAN UNION 12660/12 RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED GENVAL 53 EVALUATION REPORT ON THE FIFTH ROUND OF MUTUAL EVALUATIONS "FINANCIAL CRIME AND FINANCIAL INVESTIGATIONS" REPORT ON SPAIN 12660/12 PN/ec 1 DGD 2B RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED EN www.parlament.gv.at RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 5 2 NATIONAL SYSTEM AND CRIMINAL POLICY ........................................... 7 2.1 SPECIALIZED UNITS ............................................................................................ 7 2.1.1 Investigative authorities ................................................................................ 7 2.1.2 Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) ................................................................ 10 2.1.3 Asset Recovery Office (ARO) and other similar bodies ............................
    [Show full text]
  • Delitos Económicos
    06-19 ESCRITURA 114:62escritura 06-13 5/12/18 10:09 Página 6 6| Escritura PÚBLICA | noviembre-diciembre 2018 | EN EL ESCAPARATE | IN THE SPOTLIGHT Delitos económicos: Inauguración. De izda. a dcha.: José la colaboración del Notariado Ángel Martínez Sanchiz, Pedro Garrido y José Marqueño. en su prevención y persecución Initial XPERTOS DE LAS PRINCIPALES instituciones inter‐ rrorismo, el blanqueo de capitales o el fraude fiscal, en‐ conference nacionales, como Naciones Unidas, la Comisión Eu‐ tre otros. (left to right): E ropea, el Grupo de Acción Financiera Internacional Por parte española participaron miembros de la Poli‐ José Ángel Martínez (de Latinoamérica), la Oficina Europea de Lucha contra el cía Nacional, Guardia Civil, Audiencia Nacional, SEPBLAC, Sanchiz, Pedro Fraude, o Europol debatieron sobre cómo intensificar y Fiscalías Especiales Anticorrupción y Antidroga, Aduanas, Garrido, and José sistematizar la colaboración de los notarios en la preven‐ Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores, Agencia Marqueño. ción y lucha contra delitos como la financiación del te‐ Estatal de Administración Tributaria, Tribunal de Cuen‐ in English Crimes of a financial Experts from major international institutions preventing and combating crimes such as such as the United Nations, the European terrorist financing, money laundering, and nature: Collaboration Commission, the Financial Action Task Force tax fraud, among others.. of the Notariat in of Latin America, the European Anti-Fraud Spanish engagement included members Office, and Europol discussed ways to step of the National Police, Civil Guard, National Prevention and up and systematize notarial collaboration in High Court, the SEPBLAC money laundering Prosecution At the end of November, the Madrid headquarters of the General Council of the Spanish Notariat (CGN) hosted the international forum Economic Crimes: Collaboration of the Notariat in Prevention and Prosecution, organized by the host institution and the International Union of Notaries (UINL), representing notaries from 88 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Crime and Financial Investigations"
    Council of the European Union Brussels, 23 January 2018 (OR. en) 12660/12 DCL 1 GENVAL 53 DECLASSIFICATION of document: ST12660/12 RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED dated: 19 September 2012 new status: Public Subject: EVALUATION REPORT ON THE FIFTH ROUND OF MUTUAL EVALUATIONS "FINANCIAL CRIME AND FINANCIAL INVESTIGATIONS" REPORT ON SPAIN . Delegations will find attached the declassified version of the above document. The text of this document is identical to the previous version. 12660/12 DCL 1 /dl DGF 2C EN RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED COUNCIL OF Brussels, 19 September 2012 THE EUROPEAN UNION 12660/12 RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED GENVAL 53 EVALUATION REPORT ON THE FIFTH ROUND OF MUTUAL EVALUATIONS "FINANCIAL CRIME AND FINANCIAL INVESTIGATIONS" REPORT ON SPAIN 12660/12 PN/ec 1 DGD 2B RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED EN RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 5 2 NATIONAL SYSTEM AND CRIMINAL POLICY ........................................... 7 2.1 SPECIALIZED UNITS ............................................................................................ 7 2.1.1 Investigative authorities ................................................................................ 7 2.1.2 Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) ................................................................ 10 2.1.3 Asset Recovery Office (ARO) and other similar bodies ............................. 11 2.1.4 Judicial authorities .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ASPI Counterterrorism Yearbook 2021
    COUNTERTERRORISM YEARBOOK 2021 S OF AS AR P E I S Y T Y R T A T N E E G Y W T 2 0 1 01 - 2 0 2 ABOUT ASPI The Australian Strategic Policy Institute was formed in 2001 as an independent, non‑partisan think tank. Its core aim is to provide the Australian Government with fresh ideas on Australia’s defence, security and strategic policy choices. ASPI is responsible for informing the public on a range of strategic issues, generating new thinking for government and harnessing strategic thinking internationally. ASPI’s sources of funding are identified in our Annual Report, online at http://www.aspi.org.au and in the acknowledgements section of individual publications. ASPI remains independent in the content of the research and in all editorial judgements. It is incorporated as a company, and is governed by a Council with broad membership. ASPI’s core values are collegiality, originality and innovation, quality and excellence and independence. ASPI’s publications—including this paper—are not intended in any way to express or reflect the views of the Australian Government. The opinions and recommendations in this paper are published by ASPI to promote public debate and understanding of strategic and defence issues. They reflect the personal views of the author(s) and should not be seen as representing the formal position of ASPI on any particular issue. ABOUT THE COUNTER-TERRORISM POLICY CENTRE ASPI’s Counter‑Terrorism Policy Centre (CTPC) was established in late 2015. The centre undertakes research across the spectrum of counterterrorism topics, facilitates dialogue and discussion amongst stakeholders, and provides advice to government, community and industry stakeholders, with a particular focus on what can be done to counter terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • D4.4 Landscape and Gap Analysis FINAL After QA
    Rights, Equality and Citizenship (REC) Programme of the European Commission (2014-2020) Monitoring and Detecting Online Hate Speech Version 1.1 D4.4 Landscape and Gap Analysis Abstract This is deliverable 4.4 for the Mandola project. This document focuses on the variety of ongoing initiatives (both EC funded and Non EC-funded, and profiles current activities in Europe and performs a brief Gap Analysis. Many countries are already supported by hotlines taking reports about hate speech through the INHOPE network and through other networks including INACH. However, some countries still do not have a structured response to hate speech or a method to handle complaints or reports about hate speech. For example, many members of the INHOPE network are from the area of children’s rights and have no mandate to respond to hate speech except in-so-far as they affect children. This report will highlight best practice in this field and through the gap analysis determine areas which MANDOLA will focus on. Contractual D ate of Delivery 30 Nov 201 6 Actual Date of Delivery 21 August 2017 Deliverable Security Class Public Editor Cormac Callanan <[email protected]> Contributors All MANDOLA partners Quality Assurance Marios Dikaiakos <[email protected]> MANDOLA D4.1 This project is implemented by the Mandola Consortium and funded by the Rights, Equality and Citizenship (REC) Programme of the European Commission. The MANDOLA consortium consists of: FORTH Coordinator Greece ACONITE Principal Contractor Ireland ICITA Principal Contractor Bulgaria INTHEMIS Principal Contractor France UAM Principal Contractor Spain UCY Principal Contractor Cyprus UM Principal Contractor France www.mandola-project.eu - 2 / 139 - August 2017 Document Revisions & Quality Assurance MANDOLA D4.1 Document Revisions & Quality Assurance Internal Reviewers 1.
    [Show full text]