DOCSLIB.ORG

Eg Phd, Mphil, Dclinpsychol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eg Phd, Mphil, Dclinpsychol This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine in Decline (1982-2007). Political Agency and Marginalisation. By Francesco Saverio Leopardi PhD Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies The University of Edinburgh 2017 2 Abstract. This thesis examines the political trajectory of the Popular Front for the Liberation Palestine (PFLP) during the period from the 1982 eviction of the Palestinian factions from their headquarters in Beirut, to the 2006-07 division between Hamas and Fatah in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT). During this period, the PFLP experienced a process of decline that resulted in its marginalisation within the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) and the wider Palestinian national movement. This study addresses the issue of the PFLP’s decline by focusing on its own political agency to determine the role of policy and decision making, ideology and political narrative in the marginalisation process. This work therefore, on the one hand, aims at putting the PFLP’s decline into historical perspective, identifying it as a process rather than simply the effect of outstanding events as it is often argued. On the other, its goal is to ascribe to ‘subjective factors’, namely aspects directly linked to the PFLP’s agency, the adequate weight in determining its decline. This appears particularly significant as the weakening of the Palestinian left has been frequently explained as a by-product of global and local external or ‘objective’ developments such as the downfall of the Soviet Union or the emergence of political Islam. By providing a comprehensive and processual analysis of the PFLP’s decline, this study not only aims at complementing the literature on the Palestinian national movement, which still lacks a focused approach on the main Palestinian leftist force. It also aims at shedding light on a major cause, and its historical origins, of the current Palestinian political impasse, namely the absence of an alternative between Hamas and the PNA’s governing entities, both crippled by a legitimacy crisis and unable to progress Palestinian interests. By virtue of its close survey of the PFLP’s conduct, a further goal of this thesis is to address the historical role of the PLO and its de-facto heir, the PNA. What is evidenced is the double, and contradictory, role of the essential but also constraining framework that the PLO and later the PNA represented for the PFLP’s policies. The focus on the PFLP’s political agency allows the identification of a pattern in its policy which affected negatively its standing within the Palestinian national movement. Throughout the period addressed, policy fluctuation marked the PFLP’s action, undermining the effectiveness of its political line and jeopardising its political 3 weight. The present study highlights how such a policy fluctuation pattern originated from major dilemmas and contradictions that the PFLP had to consider while producing its policies. The main dilemma, informing all other sources of tensions affecting the PFLP, has been defined as an ‘opposition-integration’ dilemma. In other words, the PFLP, while opposing the PLO leadership’s policies, first and foremost its quest for a diplomatic settlement with Israel under US patronage, needed to maintain its integration within the PLO regime, which represented an essential economic and political framework. This produced inconsistent, ‘fluctuant’ policies that prevented the PFLP from maintaining its political weight and stopping its marginalisation process. This opposition-integration dilemma was combined with other sources of tensions marking the PFLP such as: relations with other PLO opposition factions, relations with Arab partners, its contacts with Palestinian Islamists, the confrontation with the PNA after the 1993 Oslo accords or the internal divide between the exiled leadership and the cadres located in the OPT. The PFLP’s official publications, mainly retrieved from its mouthpiece, Al-Hadaf magazine, embodied the main source upon which this study relies. Beside this corpus of documents, other primary sources, such as documents issued by relevant actors, have been scrutinised, while all information has been read against the background of the wider academic literature currently available on the Palestinian national movement. This research also drew information from interviews with former and current PFLP members as well as with experts of the Palestinian national movement. 4 Lay summary. The present thesis studies the history of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), the main Palestinian leftist faction and second movement for size and popularity within the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), the umbrella organisation internationally recognised as representative of the Palestinian people. This thesis addresses the period between 1982 and 2007, as the PFLP experienced a marginalisation process during this time lapse. Such process started after the eviction of the Palestinian forces from their headquarters in Beirut following the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon and appeared completed in 2007, when the conflict between Fatah, ruling party of the Palestinian National Authority (PNA) and Hamas, its main, Islamist rival, consecrated the polarisation of the Palestinian political field. In analysing this marginalisation process, the thesis focuses on the PFLP’s political agency, namely its decision-making process, policy production and the evolution of its political line to investigate the role of these ‘subjective factors’ in its decline. The goal is to outline how the PFLP responded to outstanding challenges (downfall of Soviet Union, rise of Islamist rivals, etc.) to provide a deeper, more complete description of the dynamics causing its decline. Based on this approach, this study describes a ‘policy fluctuation’ pattern affecting the PFLP negatively and resurfacing throughout the period addressed. By policy fluctuation what is meant is the PFLP’s inability to produce a consistent political line capable of balancing the different sources of pressures, both internal and external, endured over the time. The result was a fluctuation between such sources of pressure that undermined the effectiveness of the PFLP’s agenda, its political credibility and popular support. In the investigation of the sources of pressures, or contradictions, producing policy fluctuation, this study outlines a fundamental dynamic, influencing all other relevant factors: the opposition- integration dilemma. This dilemma, characterising the PFLP all over its history but whose effects were exacerbated after 1982, consists in the pursuit of opposition to the PLO leadership, namely Fatah, while considering integration into the PLO institutions, and therefore its overall unity, as a priority. This dilemma combined with other dynamics, such as relations with other Palestinian forces, relations with regional allies or internal divisions, worsening the policy fluctuations pattern. 5 The thesis follows a chronological order to keep track of the aforementioned dynamics over the time. The first two chapters focuses on the period between 1982 and 1987. Specifically, they respectively treat the PFLP’s policies towards the Palestinian internal situation, marked by deep divisions and the PFLP’s relations with Syria and the USSR. The third chapter addresses the PFLP’s conduct during the first half of the First Intifada (1987-1990) to show how returning problems jeopardised the PFLP’s chances to revive its political course. The fourth chapter covers the 1990s, a decade of great transformations with the 1993 Oslo accords between Israel and the PLO and the advent of the PNA. The fifth and last chapter approaches the history of the Second Intifada (2000-2005) and of the following years until the 2006-2007 Fatah-Hamas conflict. 6 Thesis Declaration. This is to certify that: the work contained within has been composed by me, and this is entirely my own work, and no part of this thesis has been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. Signed: F.S. Leopardi Date: 09 October 2017 7 8 Acknowledgments. I would like to thank the University of Edinburgh for giving me the opportunity to pursue my PhD and develop my research and professional skills. I am also grateful to the Council for British Research in the Levant for providing a travel grant which was essential in ensuring the success of this research. Joining the Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies Department at the University of Edinburgh allowed me to be part of a welcoming and stimulating community. My gratitude therefore, goes to my supervisors Dr Anthony Gorman and Dr Thomas Pierret whose guidance and advice made the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Student Officers: President: Mohamed El Habbak Chairs: Adam Beblawy, Ibrahim Shoukry
    Forum: Security Council Issue: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict Student Officers: President: Mohamed El Habbak Chairs: Adam Beblawy, Ibrahim Shoukry Introduction: Beginning in the mid-20th century, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the still continuing dispute between Israel and Palestine and part of the larger Arab-Israeli conflict, and is known as the world’s “most intractable conflict.” Despite efforts to reach long-term peace, both parties have failed to reach a final agreement. The crux of the problem lies in a few major points including security, borders, water rights, control of Jerusalem, Israeli settlements, Palestinian freedom of movement, and Palestinian right of return. Furthermore, a hallmark of the conflict is the level of violence for practically the entirety of the conflict, which hasn’t been confined only to the military, but has been prevalent in civilian populations. The main solution proposed to end the conflict is the two-state solution, which is supported by the majority of Palestinians and Israelis. However, no consensus has been reached and negotiations are still underway to this day. The gravity of this conflict is significant as lives are on the line every day, multiple human rights violations take place frequently, Israel has an alleged nuclear arsenal, and the rise of some terroristic groups and ideologies are directly linked to it. Key Terms: Gaza Strip: Region of Palestine under Egyptian control. Balfour Declaration: British promise to the Jewish people to create a sovereign state for them. Golan Heights: Syrian territory under Israeli control. West Bank: Palestinian sovereign territory under Jordanian protection. Focused Overview: To understand this struggle, one must examine the origins of each group’s claim to the land.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-2019 Model Arab League BACKGROUND GUIDE Council on Palestinian Affairs Ncusar.Org/Modelarableague
    2018-2019 Model Arab League BACKGROUND GUIDE Council on Palestinian Affairs ncusar.org/modelarableague Original draft by Jamila Velez Khader, Chair of the Council on Palestinian Affairs at the 2019 National University Model Arab League, with contributions from the dedicated staff and volunteers at the National Council on U.S.-Arab Relations Topic I: Devising strategies to plan for potential failure of peace negotiations. I. Introduction to the Topic A. General Background As early as 1947, Palestinian Arabs and Jews have wanted to undertake peace negotiations under the auspice of the United Nations. However, 1991 was the start of the series of peace negotiations between Israel and Palestine.1 The series of peace negotiations have produced a collection of peace plans, international summits, secret negotiations, UN resolutions, think tanks, initiatives, interim truces and state-building programmes, etc that have all failed. The reasons for why each peace negotiation has faltered is because each peace plan has failed to address key issues at a local, regional and global level for all parties involved. The main players in these negotiations include the Palestinian government, political parties of Palestine, the Israeli State, and members of the Arab League and United Nations. The most recent peace plan between one of Palestine’s prominent political parties, Hamas, which governs Gaza, took place with Israel in Cairo, Egypt. Currently, Egypt is finalizing the details of a one year truce that could extend to four years.2 Although this can be considered progress, it is only short term. A truce up to four years is not sustainable and does not resolve the larger issues at hand which include: Palestinian statehood, border placement, rights of Palestinian refugees and diaspora, Israeli settlements and the role of Arab League and United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamas and Fateh Neck and Neck As Palestinian Elections Near
    OPINION OFFICE OF ANALYSIS RESEARCH DEPARTMENT OF STATE, WASHINGTON, DC 20520 January 19, 2005 M-05-06 Hamas and Fateh Neck and Neck As Palestinian Elections Near A just-completed Office of Research survey in the Palestinian Territories shows a much closer race at the polls than some have predicted. Among likely voters, 32 percent intend to back Fateh on the National Ballot, while 30 percent say they will support Hamas. Corruption is the leading issue among the Palestinian public, with most believing that Hamas is more qualified than Fateh to clean it up. While Hamas is seen as less able than Fateh to advance negotiations with Israel, a majority of both Fateh and Hamas supporters back a continuation of the ceasefire, ongoing talks with Israel, and a two-state solution. The survey, conducted January 13-15, indicates that eight-in-ten among the electorate are either “very likely” (53%) or “somewhat likely” (28%) to vote on the National Ballot in the January 25th elections for the Palestinian Legislative Council. Among likely voters, about a third each intend to vote for Hamas and Fateh (Table 1). Independent Palestine, led by Mustafa Bhargouti, is backed by 13 percent of likely voters. Based on these results, Fateh would gain roughly 24 of the 66 National Ballot seats, Hamas 22 seats, Independent Palestine 9 seats, with the remaining 11 split among smaller parties. These results show a closer race than other published surveys of likely voters, which have tended to place Fateh ahead at the polls by a wider margin (Appendix, Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Hamas: Militant Legacy Or Israeli Tool?
    THE ORIGINS OF HAMAS: MILITANT LEGACY OR ISRAELI TOOL? JEAN-PIERRE FILIU Since its creation in 1987, Hamas has been at the forefront of armed resistance in the occupied Palestinian territories. While the move- ment itself claims an unbroken militancy in Palestine dating back to 1935, others credit post-1967 maneuvers of Israeli Intelligence for its establishment. This article, in assessing these opposing nar- ratives and offering its own interpretation, delves into the historical foundations of Hamas starting with the establishment in 1946 of the Gaza branch of the Muslim Brotherhood (the mother organization) and ending with its emergence as a distinct entity at the outbreak of the !rst intifada. Particular emphasis is given to the Brotherhood’s pre-1987 record of militancy in the Strip, and on the complicated and intertwining relationship between the Brotherhood and Fatah. HAMAS,1 FOUNDED IN the Gaza Strip in December 1987, has been the sub- ject of numerous studies, articles, and analyses,2 particularly since its victory in the Palestinian legislative elections of January 2006 and its takeover of Gaza in June 2007. Yet despite this, little academic atten- tion has been paid to the historical foundations of the movement, which grew out of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Gaza branch established in 1946. Meanwhile, two contradictory interpretations of the movement’s origins are in wide circulation. The !rst portrays Hamas as heir to a militant lineage, rigorously inde- pendent of all Arab regimes, including Egypt, and harking back to ‘Izz al-Din al-Qassam,3 a Syrian cleric killed in 1935 while !ghting the British in Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • An Unusual Revolution: the Palestinian Thawra in Lebanon, C
    Durham Middle East Papers AN UNUSuaL REVOLUTION: THE PALESTINIAN THAWra IN LEBANON, C. 1969-82 Dr Anne Irfan Durham Middle East Paper No. 103 Durham Middle East Papers Institute for Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies Institute for Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies Durham University Al-Qasimi Building Elvet Hill Road Durham AN UNUSuaL REVOLUTION: Durham Middle East Papers No. 103 DH1 3TU ISSN 1476-4830 THE PALESTINIAN THAWra IN LEBANON, C. 1969-82 Tel: +44 (0)191 3345680 September 2020 The Durham Middle East Papers series covers all aspects of the economy, politics, social science, history, literature and languages of the Middle East. Authors are invited to submit papers to the Editorial Board for consideration for publication. Dr Anne Irfan The views expressed in this paper are the author(s) alone and do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher or IMEIS. All Rights Reserved. This paper cannot be photocopied or reproduced without prior permission. Durham Middle East Paper No. 103 © Dr Anne Irfan and Durham University, 2020 About The Institute Editorial Board The Institute for Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (IMEIS), within the Professor Anoush Ehteshami Dr Colin Turner School of Government & International Affairs, is a Social Science-focused Exofficio member Reader in Islamic Thought in academic institute of excellence, research-led in ethos, with a track-record of Professor of International Relations the School of Government and internationally acclaimed research outputs across all sub-areas of its activity. in the School of
    [Show full text]
  • PFLP Bulletin No. 60
    To our readers: This Bulletin is enlarged and delayed due to our wish to include the report of the PFLP Central Committee meeting in February. Then , as we were going to press, the Zionist occupation authorities dissolved the AI Bireh municipal council, and the uprising of our masses escalated greatly. These events are the lead article; the rest of the material in the Bulletin covers the time period prior to March 15th. Due to the expansion of this issue, you will not be receiving a Bulletin dated May. Bulletin No. 62 will be out in Table of Contents: 3 Events in the occupied territories 5 Editorial 6 Occupied homeland Day of the Land Conference in Acca 7 Current Zionist settlement policy 12 Bir Zeit University closed Palestinian prisoner released 13 Story of a Palestinian under occupation -interview with Salih Baransi 18 Golan Heights general strike 19 Zionist attack expected in Lebanon -:- interview with PFLP's military responsible Abu Ahmed Fuad 21 Martyrs Day 22 Mass rally in Sour 24 March in Allay commemorating Kamal Jumblatt 25 Poem to the Palestinian people I 28 Palestinian Communist Party 30 Mass work 31 International Womens Day Interview with Jihan Helou, General Union of Palestinian Women 34 Women speak 35 PFLP marks Womens Day - presentation by Comrade George Habash 37 Egypt- interview with Progressive Assembly Party 39 Subversion against Democratic Yemen 40 PFLP Central Committee Report 52 SW APO anniversary ~--;::::;::u::i:::h:;L~~;;-----------~ 1 ::;r:=~ ;·:::::::::::::::: : :: :: ::::::::: : ::: : :::::::::::::::::: : ::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: : ::::::::::: : ::::::::: : ::: : ::::::: :: :: : : : ::::: : : : : : :::: :: ::::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: : : : : 1 City: .............................................. ....... ............. .......... Country: ....................................... : .... .. ............... .................................................. 1 Enclosed is a cheque of$ ............................ .. ...... for ......... .. ................... No. of subscriptions I1 I 0 I/We want.
    [Show full text]
  • Syria a Revolution, a Conspiracy Or a Civil
    Foreign debts, reforms and the change of the social pact in the Arab World The Making of the Washington Consensus in the Middle East and North Africa. Negotiating international assets, debts and power (1979-91) University of Bologna, October 10-11, 2018 Samir AITA President, Cercle des Economistes Arabes The 1980’s and the Arab countries • What really characterizes this decade comparatively to others? • Did this decade really changed the Arab countries and rooted the “Arab Spring”? • How internal social, economic and political issues interacted with world environment? • Is it all about oil? Or about development paradigms? The 1980’s and the Arab countries • Why a crisis of foreign debts in the 1980’s? The 1980’s and the Arab countries • What were the causes and the consequences of inflation? Political and social issues 1950’s-1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s Internal politics • Political instability • Stability • Extreme stability • Extreme stability Regional politics • Comptetition • Cohesive • Extreme divisions • Cohesive • Wars Ideology • Anti-colonial • Arabism • « Me first » • Islamism • Arabism • Palestine less • Islamism • Palestine less • Modernism/reactio central • Palestine not central central nary • Democracy? • War on • Democracy? • Palestine Central « communism » (Afghanistan) • Democracy? Elites • Urban elites • Rural, tribal • ‘Asabiyah • Extremely • Urban ➔Rural, ‘Asabiyah & • Extremely authoritarian tribal elites clientelism authoritarian • ‘Asabiyah • Authoritarian • Clientelism weakening • What’s next? Society • Rural-urban
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine 100 Years of Struggle: the Most Important Events Yasser
    Palestine 100 Years of Struggle: The Most Important Events Yasser Arafat Foundation 1 Early 20th Century - The total population of Palestine is estimated at 600,000, including approximately 36,000 of the Jewish faith, most of whom immigrated to Palestine for purely religious reasons, the remainder Muslims and Christians, all living and praying side by side. 1901 - The Zionist Organization (later called the World Zionist Organization [WZO]) founded during the First Zionist Congress held in Basel Switzerland in 1897, establishes the “Jewish National Fund” for the purpose of purchasing land in Palestine. 1902 - Ottoman Sultan Abdul Hamid II agrees to receives Theodor Herzl, the founder of the Zionist movement and, despite Herzl’s offer to pay off the debt of the Empire, decisively rejects the idea of Zionist settlement in Palestine. - A majority of the delegates at The Fifth Zionist Congress view with favor the British offer to allocate part of the lands of Uganda for the settlement of Jews. However, the offer was rejected the following year. 2 1904 - A wave of Jewish immigrants, mainly from Russia and Poland, begins to arrive in Palestine, settling in agricultural areas. 1909 Jewish immigrants establish the city of “Tel Aviv” on the outskirts of Jaffa. 1914 - The First World War begins. - - The Jewish population in Palestine grows to 59,000, of a total population of 657,000. 1915- 1916 - In correspondence between Sir Henry McMahon, the British High Commissioner in Egypt, and Sharif Hussein of Mecca, wherein Hussein demands the “independence of the Arab States”, specifying the boundaries of the territories within the Ottoman rule at the time, which clearly includes Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • RESPONSES to INFORMATION REQUESTS (Rirs) Page 1 of 2
    Home > Research > Responses to Information Requests RESPONSES TO INFORMATION REQUESTS (RIRs) New Search | About RIR's | Help 03 April 2006 JOR101125.E Jordan: The "Arab National Movement" and treatment of its members by authorities (January 1999 - March 2006) Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Ottawa Information on the Arab National Movement (ANM) in Jordan was scarce among the sources consulted by the Research Directorate. The ANM is described as a Marxist political party (Political Handbook of the Middle East 2006 2006, 238) founded in Beirut in 1948 following the founding of the State of Israel (HRW Oct. 2002; CDI 23 Oct. 2002). The ANM was founded (IPS n.d.) and led by George Habash who went on to create the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PLFP) (ibid.; HRW Oct. 2002). According to the Center for Defense Information (CDI), a part of the World Security Institute (WSI), which is a research institute supported by public charity and based in Washington, DC (CDI n.d.), the ANM "spread quickly throughout the Arab World" (ibid. 23 Oct. 2002). The CDI added that the ANM was allied with Egypt's Gamal Abdul- Nasser, with whom it shared views on "a unified, free and socialist Arab world with an autonomous Palestine" (ibid.). The Political Handbook of the Middle East 2006 stated that in a 1989 Jordanian poll, the ANM was one of several political parties supporting independent political candidates (2006, 238). The most recent media report on the ANM found by the Research Directorate was from the 29 August 1999 issue of the Jerusalem-based Al-Quds newspaper, which reported that members of the ANM were part of a subcommittee to the Jordanian Opposition Parties' Coordinating Committee, made up of the 14 Jordanian opposition parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Zionist Repression Using the T Amir
    '. "One of the major reasons for the formation of the PFLP was the class perspective we gave the Palestinian and Arab struggle. Through experience we learned that the most oppressed classes - the workers, peasants, sections of the petit bourgeoisie, the Palestinians living in the refugee camps - are the ones most in contradiction with the imperialist, Zionist and reactionary alliance. It is they who carve history with determination that can persevere in this protracted war without wavering." Comrade George Habash The Popular Front for the Uberation of Palestine is a Marxist-Leninist organization that is an integral part of the Palestinian Resistance and the Arab national liberation movement. The Bulletin is the English language magazine of the PFL~. It has been published monthly since March 1979 with the following aims: - presenting-the political line of the PFLP - providing current information and analysis of the Palestinian liberation struggle, as well as developments in the Arab world and on the international level - serving as a tool for building solidarity with progressive organizations, parties, national liberation movements and countries around the world Subscribing to the PFLP Bulletin is one way you can support these aims; so is encouraging comrades and friends to read and subscribe to the Bulletin. Another means for supporting our work is to write to us with your evaiuations, suggestions and criticism concerning the Bulletin. In addition, back issues are available upon request. Ofparticular interest are these back issues which contain major PFLP policy statements of current relevance : PFLP Bulletin No. 33 features a comprehensive interview with Comrade George Habash, General Secretary, on the how and why of the PFLP's emergence in the context of the Arab National Movement and the Palestinian struggle.
    [Show full text]
  • BPA in Memoriam G. Habash 24 Feb 08
    IN MEMORIAM GEORGE HABASH (1926 – 2008) Born in LYDDA, PALESTINE Died in Exile AMMAN, JORDAN “Every Palestinian has the right to fight for his home, his land, his family and his dignity – these are his rights.” George Habash, 1998 Dr George Habash was born into a Christian merchant family in Palestine and experienced the devastating effects of the Palestinian al-Nakba (Catastrophe) when he and his family along with 750,000 fellow Palestinians were terrorised into leaving their homes and homeland by Zionist forces to make way for the artificially created Jewish state, Israel. Although he graduated in medicine and specialised in paediatrics, he eventually devoted his time to the life-long struggle for the liberation of Palestine. In 1952, he founded the Arab Nationalist Movement (ANM) which aimed to unify the Arab world to confront Israel. He saw Zionism as a force that would divide the Arab world and believed that Egyptian President Gamal Abdul Nasser would be the instrument of Arab unity that would enable a conventional war to be mounted against Israel. The Arab loss of the 1967 six-day war dashed his hopes and the ANM folded. Habash then decided that guerrilla war was the only option for the Palestinians (despite his initial criticism of Arafat’s Fedayyeen) and he formed the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP). He believed that desperate people must turn to desperate acts and although the hijacking of planes brought world-wide condemnation, it also brought publicity to the Palestinian cause. “When we hijack a plane it has more effect than if we killed a hundred Israelis in battle .
    [Show full text]
  • Anziska, Seth Revisiting the 1982 Lebanon
    Anziska, Seth Revisiting the 1982 Lebanon War: History, Memory and the Making of Akram Zaatari’s Letter to a Refusing Pilot Israelis, it is said, tend to “forget and suppress” the 1982 invasion of Lebanon.1 There is often silence or selective remembrance about Lebanon, for some it is even an “exonerated war.”2 Yet it is not forgotten in the cities of Beirut, Sidon and Tyre, or in the Palestinian refugee camps of Burj el-Barajne, Sabra and Ain al-Hilweh. Israel’s presence in Lebanon altered daily life and shaped the political dynamics of a fractured country. Beyond the history of the war itself, what happens when the Lebanese confront their memories of 1982? In revisiting this war, how might they force us to look anew at dominant narratives of the Zionist past and Israel’s fraught place in the contemporary Middle East? My presentation focuses on the recovery of one moment in the history of the 1982 War, an incident of refusal over the skies of southern Lebanon. It is pieced together from archives, interviews and memories between Jaffa and Beirut. This uncanny story has led to Akram Zaatari’s acclaimed film installation, Letter to a Refusing Pilot, at the Lebanese Pavilion of the 2013 Venice Biennale. Zaatari’s Letter is intended for the mythological pilot revealed as Hagai Tamir, but it is for all of us to read. A portrait of life on the ground, the artist returns to the target and excavates the fabric of a quotidian Lebanese reality forgotten (or never known) in Israel.
    [Show full text]