Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Student Officers: President: Mohamed El Habbak Chairs: Adam Beblawy, Ibrahim Shoukry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Forum: Issue:

Security Council The Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Student Officers:
President: Mohamed El Habbak

Chairs: Adam Beblawy, Ibrahim Shoukry

Introduction:

Beginning in the mid-20th century, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the still continuing dispute between Israel and Palestine and part of the larger Arab-Israeli conflict, and is known as

the world’s “most intractable conflict.” Despite efforts to reach long-term peace, both parties have

failed to reach a final agreement. The crux of the problem lies in a few major points including security, borders, water rights, control of Jerusalem, Israeli settlements, Palestinian freedom of movement, and Palestinian right of return. Furthermore, a hallmark of the conflict is the level of

violence for practically the entirety of the conflict, which hasn’t been confined only to the military,

but has been prevalent in civilian populations. The main solution proposed to end the conflict is the two-state solution, which is supported by the majority of Palestinians and Israelis. However, no consensus has been reached and negotiations are still underway to this day. The gravity of this conflict is significant as lives are on the line every day, multiple human rights violations take place frequently, Israel has an alleged nuclear arsenal, and the rise of some terroristic groups and ideologies are directly linked to it.

Key Terms:

Gaza Strip: Region of Palestine under Egyptian control. Balfour Declaration: British promise to the Jewish people to create a sovereign state for them. Golan Heights: Syrian territory under Israeli control. West Bank: Palestinian sovereign territory under Jordanian protection.

Focused Overview:

To understand this struggle, one must examine the origins of each group’s claim to the

land. The land in question has been a hotbed for settlement for thousands of years, primarily due to it being the crossroads of the three continents of the old world: Africa, Asia, and Europe. Thus, it has been settled by different cultures and peoples. It all started when the Canaanites built city states in the region around 2000 BCE. Over time, sematic belief grew in the region, giving rise to the Jewish religion and culture. However, the land started seeing conquests from different kingdoms. This started with the Assyrians, then the Babylonians, then the Persians, then the Greeks, then the Romans who proceeded to destroy Jerusalem and raze the Jewish temple to the ground, then exiled the Jewish people from the land. This is significant as Christianity started and prospered during the Roman rule in the region, causing Jerusalem to become a major center for Christians as it started there. Furthermore, Jerusalem has a very important position in Islamic belief

as well. As can be seen, the area, especially Jerusalem, was the epicenter for three of the world’s

most significant religions. The Arabs then proceeded to conquer the region from the Romans, which saw several different dynasties rule the region. Then, the region started switching rulers for a few centuries. This started with the Seljuk Turks, followed by Christian European crusaders, then the Arab took it back, then the Mongols, then the Arabs took it back yet again, then the Ottoman Turks took it back once again, before the Arabs took it back for the fourth time, until the British came and gave it back to the Turks. As can be seen, the region was a mess of rulers, kingdoms, cultures, and religions for the majority of its existence. Thus, a lot of people have a lot of claims for why this land should be theirs.

Fast forward to the 19th century, things get more complicated. The new global Zionist movement brought many Jewish migrants to the region, who are looking to escape from the increasing persecution of Jews in Europe. Thus, the demographics of the land begin to become more complex after centuries of rule under the Ottomans. This leads to the British finding themselves against the Ottomans in the First World War, and they issue the Balfour Declaration of 1917. This declaration pledged British support for the creation of a national homeland for the Jewish people in this land. Shortly thereafter, the British win the war and cease a bunch of land from the Turks, including the region of modern-day Palestine and Israel.

Under British rule, the land sees an even greater influx of Jewish people to it from Europe.
This massive migration of Jews from Europe to this land across the 1920s, 30s, and 40s, along with British colonial rule, lead to widespread violence between the Jews, who wanted a homeland after the horrors of the Holocaust, and the Arabs, who had been there for over a thousand years by that time and felt like they were being displaced from their ancestral home by European colonialism, which raised an era of Palestinian national identity. Seeing this, the British announced their withdrawal from the land in the 1947 after starting the problem so that they don’t get mixed up even further. The newly formed UN recommended the partition of this land into two new independent states: one Arab state, and one Jewish state, topped with an international government that would hold control over Jerusalem itself.

The problem at the time was that the Jews and the Arabs were already fighting a war against each other while the British were still ruling it. This led to the UN Partition Plan not lasting for long. The Palestinian Arabs refused the whole thing as they saw it as the partitioning of their ancestral land by foreign colonial powers. On the other hand, the Jews, who wanted a country of their own, accepted it and declared the independence of the State of Israel in 1948, the same day the British officially withdrew. Immediately after that, the Arab states of Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq all intervened on the behalf of the Palestinian Arabs, and attacked the State of Israel after the British left everyone to figure out this problem for themselves. Roughly a year later though, Israel emerges as the surprise victor in the conflict, and ends up taking way more territory than was envisioned by the UN Partition Plan. Nearly 80% of the Palestinian Arab populations get driven out of the territory that Israel took over in this conflict and were never allowed to return, in the event that became known as the Catastrophe to the Arabs.

Over the following decades, nearly a million more Jews would migrate into the State of
Israel, either by choice or by force. This war created a situation where peace was agreed upon, but none of the Arab stated would recognize the existence of the State of Israel as a country. As a

result, Israel’s borders were entirely legally undefined, and all the ceasefire lines with the

surrounding countries became the de facto borders instead. Only two parts of this land remained under Arab control after the Israelis emerged victorious in 1949: The West Bank, so called because it is west of the Jordan River, which was annexed by the Arab Jordanians, and the Gaza strip, which was occupied by the Arab Egyptians.

This situation continued until 1967, when the State of Israel once again entered into war with the combined forces of Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. Both sides accused the other of starting this conflict. But either way, Israel once again decisively won this war and took over even more territory, absorbing the West Bank and the Gaza Strip along with the Sinai Peninsula from Egypt and the Golan Heights from Syria. Despite international objections, Israel started to colonize all of these occupied territories with Israeli settlers, which began to affect the local demographics pretty substantially.

In 1973, Egypt and Syria once again joined forces to fight Israel in another war, and this time it was more of a draw. After this conflict, Israel agreed to return the Sinai Peninsula back to Egypt and evacuate all their settlers from there in exchange for recognition and the normalization

of relations with Egypt. Israel’s southern border with Egypt was now legally defined, but it still

left Israel in occupation of the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights, with the rest of their frontiers still delineated by the 1949 Armistice Lines.

In the early 1980s, Israel officially annexed East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights into the
State of Israel, which is widely unrecognized by anybody in the international community other than for the United States. In 1988, the Arab State of Palestine was declared with claimed territory consisting of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, still under Israeli occupation. In 1994, Jordan also

recognized the State of Israel, causing Israel’s Eastern boundary to become legally defined as well.

This takes us into the situation that strip of land finds itself in today. In 1994, the Palestinian
National Authority, or PA, was created as an interim body to run parts of Gaza and the West Bank until a final solution to the problem can be agreed upon. However, the Pas authority over the West Bank was severely limited to just 165 scattered so-called islands of sovereignty that only spanned

30% of the West Bank’s entire territory. The remaining 70% of the West Bank continue to this

day to be governed and administrated by Israel. Over 400,000 Israeli settlers have since moved into these zones over the decades since, along with 200,000 more into East Jerusalem. This, in

total, has brought the West Bank’s population up to nearly 18% Israeli at this point. The PA

maintained authority over Gaza until 2007, when the Islamist faction Hamas took power over

there. Hamas rejects the PA’s authority over the West Bank as being too soft and too focused on

compromise and instead, insists that all of the land that the British controlled prior to them leaving should be a part of the State of Palestine. The State of Palestine, which is the name used by the PA in the West Bank, became a non-member observer state to the UN in 2012, and is today internationally recognized as a state by 138 sitting UN members. The major countries that do not recognize it are the USA and its allies. The State of Palestine claims the entirety of the West Bank,

the Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem as their capital. But despite this, the State of Palestine’s

effective control is only over the 165 scattered islands of sovereignty inside of the West Bank, surrounded by Israel. Meanwhile, the State of Israel is recognized by 164 UN member states, and is not recognized by 28 others including most of the Arab world, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Malaysia, and Indonesia. The vast majority of the countries that do recognize Israel, however, only

recognize Israel’s borders at the time of 1949 and do not recognize any Israeli sovereignty over

the occupied territory since then. The only country in the world who does is the United States which recognizes Israeli sovereignty over East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights, but not the West Bank or Gaza. As of December 2015, there are 6.335 million Jews who live in the area between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, contrasted by 6.561 million non-Jews. So, in the combined areas of Israel, East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip, Jews no longer represent the majority of people.

There have been dozens of peace proposals made over the decades to end the world’s

longest standing unresolved conflict. So far, none have been successful. The most recent attempt by the Trump administration and the United States seems like it is destined for failure too.

Major Parties Involved:

Palestine

Palestine was considered as the region between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River up until 1948. Most of that region is now considered as Israel. Palestine is being associated as the geographical area that is currently occupied by the State of Israel, which are the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The control over this region is a complex situation as there are no international agreements that concern the borders. Many parts that have been claimed by Palestinians, have been occupied by Israel for years. During 1947, Palestine was under British rule and the United Nations released a resolution to partition Palestine into two sections. Less than a year after the Partition Plan for Palestine was introduced, in May 1948, Britain withdrew from its rule in the region and

Israel declared itself as an independent state. Almost immediately after Israel’s declaration,

neighboring Arab countries began to move armies into the region with the goal of preventing the Israeli establishment. This situation ensued the Arab-Israeli conflict which later on began the 1967 Six-Day war as a by-product of the tension in that region.

Israel

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is regarded with the ongoing occupation of Israelis in the West
Bank and the Gaza Strip, reaching 54 years. Public claims, of Jewish homeland in Palestine, at the 1917 Balfour Declaration created early tension in the region. At the time, the Jewish population in the region grew significantly due to immigration as an outcome of World War II. Later on, countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom started to recognize establishments in Palestine as a national home for Jewish people. Due to such decisions, tension started to rise in the region and continued to build up for many years later. However, it is said that the Israeli military occupation of Palestinian territories during the 1967 Six-Day war was what started the current Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

United States

The United States plays a great role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Its involvement began shortly after World War II by recommending that one hundred thousand holocaust survivors should relocate to Palestine. In 1948, the United States became the first country that recognized Israel as a sovereign nation. Israel struggled early on, during the 1973 war, to defend itself against invading Syrian and Egyptian forces. This situation impelled the United States to take control in future diplomacy. Since 1970, the United States has been using its veto power to block resolutions that condemned Israel due to the United Nations apparent bias against Israel; as viewed by the United States.

Timeline of Events:

November 29, 1947: UN sets a partition of Palestine setting creating two different states in the region and with a third regime governing the international zone of Jerusalem. The Jews accepted this yet the Arabs rejected the proposal.

May 14, 1948: Creation of the official state of Israel with the borders of the UN had proposed a year before.

May 14, 1948: Arab-Israeli war of 1948 ended in defeat for the Arabs and Palestine. January 6, 1949: Peace between both sides with Israel occupying the entirety of the region with the exception of the Jordanian occupied West Bank and the Egyptian occupied Gaza Strip.

October 29, 1956: The Suez Crisis was an attack of Egypt by combined forces of the Israelis, British, and French after Egypt had declared its independence. It resulted in the Israeli occupation of the Sinai Peninsula and the eventual withdraw of British and French forces following increasing international tensions.

March, 1957: End of the Suez Crisis with Israel occupying the Sinai Peninsula. June 5, 1967: The Six-day war, Israel moves on a surprise attack on Egypt with Syria and neighboring Jordan and Lebanon join to assist the Arabs. It ended with a major Israeli victory with them fully occupying the Gaza Strip, Sinai Peninsula, Golan Heights, West Bank and Jerusalem.

October 6, 1973: Yom Kippur War also known as October war begins with a surprise attack by both Syria and Egypt supported by there Arab allies. Initial gains were made by the Arabs reclaiming the Sinai Peninsula and the Golan Heights, Israel counter offensives led to the encirclement of the Egyptian army in Sinai and the retaking of the Golan heights. A cease fire was negotiated and Egypt had regained the Sinai Peninsula and the West Bank was restored.

Relevant UN Treaties and Events:

Oslo Accords

Israeli and Palestinian officials aspired to find peaceful solutions to the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine during the 1993 Oslo peace process. The peace process was mainly built upon a crucial milestone where Yasser Arafat, chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization at that

time, wrote a letter of recognition of Israel’s right to exist. Some of the agreements that were made

during the peace process was for Israel to ease on Palestinian territorial control in exchange for peace. However, the peace process quickly unraveled when Yitzhak Rabin, the Israeli official that represented Israel at the Oslo Accords, was assassinated.

Taba Summit

The Taba Summit was held in Taba, Egypt in January 2001 where the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was in discussion. The summit proposed the removal of the Israeli controlled regions and the Palestinians agreed this as a basis for further negotiation. As Israeli elections started, the talks

ended but both sides attested to the progress that had been made: “The sides declare that they have

never been closer to reaching an agreement and it is thus our shared belief that the remaining gaps

could be bridged with the resumption of negotiation following Israeli elections.” However, when

a new leader was elected in Israel, Ariel Sharon, the new government chose to not return to the high-level talks.

Failed Solution Attempts:

Camp David Summit 2000

The Camp David Summit, started in 2000, was convened by the US President, Bill Clinton, between Yasser Arafat and the Prime Minister of Israel, Ehud Barak. The summit proceeded with a solution of splitting a non-militarized Palestinian state into 3 to 4 parts, containing 87-92% of the West Bank and the entire Gaza Strip. Yasser Arafat rejected the offer as it was seen that it did not remove many parts if Israeli control with respect to land and settlements.

Road Map for Peace

During September 2002, a proposal presented by Russia, the United States, the United Nations, and the Quartet of the European Union was a Road Map for Peace. This proposal did not include and clear resolution to the conflict but rather a basis for future agreements. The Road Map for Peace called for a halt in Israeli settlement construction and Israeli-Palestinian violence during its first phase. However, the Road Map for Peace never made it past its first phase and neither goal was achieved.

Possible Solutions:

One State Solution

It involves the creation of one state in which the regions of Palestine and Israel are united

under one flag. Advocates for the idea have proposed two possibility’s where this solution becomes

a reality. First, is one that includes the entirety of the current Israeli and Palestinian state in addition

to the Golan Heights and the Gaza Strip. Second, is one that doesn’t include the Gaza Strip as it is

virtually self-sufficient. Internationally the plan succeeds with most nations favoring the option, yet voters in both states stand against the idea of the one state solution.

The one state solution has gained most of its popularity during the 21st century mostly due to the fact that the two-state solution has failed to achieve any form of peace for the better part of the 20th century. The proposition of all current Israeli and Palestinian territory to be combined under a non-segregating state. The Israeli-Palestinian nation would allow for free migration, provide equal rights, and acknowledge all of it inhabitants the same without judgement of race, religion, or any other prejudice that may impact the judgment of the nation. The second proposition of this idea disclosed the Gaza Strip and may even allow for the Golan Heights to return as Syrian Sovereign territory. It is important to not the returning of the Golan Heights is unlikely due to Syria’s current political instability. It disclosed the Gaza Strip due to its current self-sufficiency; the Gaza Strip would continue to function as it does with Egypt having major influence over the region.

That being said, both Israeli and Palatines voters appear to be strongly against the one state solutions. However, it is possible that voter responses have been altered within both nations and on both sides of the argument. For the one state solution to become a reality it would likely not come from within Palestine or Israel but rather from international influence and pressure.

The Two States

The Two States have crossed the line with one another through there volatile history. The
Two States would be divided at the borders of 1967, and the borders should be left there. The idea is accepted by most of the international community and aims two divide the two nations into one consisting of an Arab majority and one consisting of Jewish majority.

The Solution aims to divide the two peoples of the land into nations in which their rights may be secured with absolute determination of there very own respective states. Majority nations and major world power agree that the right of self-determination should be granted to the Palestinians and the Israelis alike. The major concerns of the Two State Solution would be the current Israeli settlers on what would be Palestinian Sovereign territory if the 67 line would be applied. As such they would be forced to migrate back to Israel most likely at the end of a barrel rather than by their own free will. The second issue is the City of Jerusalem which is considered holy by both Muslims and Jews alike. As such it would likely remain as a UN supervised international zone rather than belong to one or the other with the holy sites being accessible to all.

Useful Links

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_of_Control https://www.usip.org/publications/2020/01/israeli-palestinian-conflict-2020-what-are-possible-paths- ahead

https://www.heyalma.com/israel-guide/what-are-the-proposed-solutions-to-the-israeli-palestinian- conflict/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-state_solution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kashmir_conflict https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/4/2/anti-india-clashes-erupt-after-troops-kill-three-kashmir- rebels

Recommended publications
  • 2018-2019 Model Arab League BACKGROUND GUIDE Council on Palestinian Affairs Ncusar.Org/Modelarableague

    2018-2019 Model Arab League BACKGROUND GUIDE Council on Palestinian Affairs Ncusar.Org/Modelarableague

    2018-2019 Model Arab League BACKGROUND GUIDE Council on Palestinian Affairs ncusar.org/modelarableague Original draft by Jamila Velez Khader, Chair of the Council on Palestinian Affairs at the 2019 National University Model Arab League, with contributions from the dedicated staff and volunteers at the National Council on U.S.-Arab Relations Topic I: Devising strategies to plan for potential failure of peace negotiations. I. Introduction to the Topic A. General Background As early as 1947, Palestinian Arabs and Jews have wanted to undertake peace negotiations under the auspice of the United Nations. However, 1991 was the start of the series of peace negotiations between Israel and Palestine.1 The series of peace negotiations have produced a collection of peace plans, international summits, secret negotiations, UN resolutions, think tanks, initiatives, interim truces and state-building programmes, etc that have all failed. The reasons for why each peace negotiation has faltered is because each peace plan has failed to address key issues at a local, regional and global level for all parties involved. The main players in these negotiations include the Palestinian government, political parties of Palestine, the Israeli State, and members of the Arab League and United Nations. The most recent peace plan between one of Palestine’s prominent political parties, Hamas, which governs Gaza, took place with Israel in Cairo, Egypt. Currently, Egypt is finalizing the details of a one year truce that could extend to four years.2 Although this can be considered progress, it is only short term. A truce up to four years is not sustainable and does not resolve the larger issues at hand which include: Palestinian statehood, border placement, rights of Palestinian refugees and diaspora, Israeli settlements and the role of Arab League and United Nations.
  • Palestinian Forces

    Palestinian Forces

    Center for Strategic and International Studies Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy 1800 K Street, N.W. • Suite 400 • Washington, DC 20006 Phone: 1 (202) 775 -3270 • Fax : 1 (202) 457 -8746 Email: [email protected] Palestinian Forces Palestinian Authority and Militant Forces Anthony H. Cordesman Center for Strategic and International Studies [email protected] Rough Working Draft: Revised February 9, 2006 Copyright, Anthony H. Cordesman, all rights reserved. May not be reproduced, referenced, quote d, or excerpted without the written permission of the author. Cordesman: Palestinian Forces 2/9/06 Page 2 ROUGH WORKING DRAFT: REVISED FEBRUARY 9, 2006 ................................ ................................ ............ 1 THE MILITARY FORCES OF PALESTINE ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 2 THE OSLO ACCORDS AND THE NEW ISRAELI -PALESTINIAN WAR ................................ ................................ .............. 3 THE DEATH OF ARAFAT AND THE VICTORY OF HAMAS : REDEFINING PALESTINIAN POLITICS AND THE ARAB - ISRAELI MILITARY BALANCE ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 4 THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY FORC ES ................................ ................................ .......... 5 Palestinian Authority Forces During the Peace Process ................................ ................................ ..................... 6 The
  • Presidium Model United Nations 13Th-14Th August 2021

    Presidium Model United Nations 13Th-14Th August 2021

    Presidium Model United Nations 13th-14th August 2021 The United Nations Human Rights Council Agenda: The Israel-Palestine Conflict 1 LETTER FROM THE EXECUTIVE BOARD The Executive Board of Presidium Model United Nations welcomes each one of you. For many it may be the first ever MUN conference in your educational experience, and we strongly encourage you to go through the study guide that has been prepared for you as a part of the conference in order to get an in depth understanding of the issue that will be discussed in the committee. However, there is lot of content available beyond the study guides too. You are expected to research, collate, list down possible points of discussions, questions and plausible responses and be prepared to enjoy the intellectual energy in the group. At the same time it is not only about speaking and presenting, but very importantly it is also about the ability to listen, understand view points and learn from each one’s perspectives. Wishing all of you a great learning experience. Looking forward to having you all with us. Best wishes The Executive Board 1. Akul Halan (President) 2. Vansham Mudgil (Vice-President) 3. Sonal Gupta (Substantial Director) 2 The United Nations Security Council The Human Rights Council is an intergovernmental body of the United Nations, through which States discuss human rights conditions in the UN Member States. The Council’s mandate is to promote “universal respect for the protection of all human rights and fundamental freedoms for all” and “address situations of violations of human rights, including gross and systematic violations, and make recommendations thereon.” The Human Rights Council was established in 2006 by Resolution 60/251 as a subsidiary body to the UN General Assembly.
  • Advocating for Israel: History, Tools and Tips a Message from the Baltimore Jewish Council: TABLE of CONTENTS

    Advocating for Israel: History, Tools and Tips a Message from the Baltimore Jewish Council: TABLE of CONTENTS

    Advocating for Israel: History, Tools and Tips A Message from the Baltimore Jewish Council: TABLE OF CONTENTS The publication of this guide, Advocating for Israel: History, Tools and Tips, provides an opportunity for Introduction those who support Israel to become more involved in advocating on its behalf. It is designed for those who are becoming politically active for the first time, as well as seasoned Israel supporters. Event Timeline…………………………………………………………………………………………...2 While many people have traveled to Israel, attended lectures, and/or read about the country, there are Israel: Background…………………………………………………………………………………...….7 many who are not aware or comfortable with the process of advocacy. The purpose of this guide is to help bridge that gap. Key Words and Common Terms About Israel………………………………..………………………. 9 This guide was not created for a “one-time” event; it is a resource that can sit in your home, office, Understanding Israel’s Government…………………………...………………………………………11 classroom, or backpack and may be referred to at any time. Israel: Some Facts………………………….……………………………………………………………13 Information in this guide was developed from a variety of publications and web-based sources. We have Advocating for Israel………………...………………………………………………………...........…14 made every effort to confirm the veracity of the facts presented. Writing a Letter to Your Representative………………………………………………………………..15 To become more involved in Israel advocacy, please contact the Baltimore Jewish Council at Meeting With Officials………………………………………………………………………………….17 410-542-4850
  • View/Print Page As PDF

    View/Print Page As PDF

    MENU Policy Analysis / Articles & Op-Eds Armistice Now: An Interim Agreement for Israel and Palestine Feb 24, 2010 Articles & Testimony R ead this article at ForeignAffairs.com More than 16 years after the euphoria of the Oslo accords, the Israelis and the Palestinians have still not reached a final-status peace agreement. Indeed, the last decade has been dominated by setbacks -- the second intifada, which started in September 2000; Hamas' victory in the January 2006 Palestinian legislative elections; and then its military takeover of the Gaza Strip in June 2007 -- all of which have aggravated the conflict. A further effort to reach a comprehensive settlement is bound to falter, thus increasing the dangers of another major flare-up and undermining the credibility of the Palestinian Authority (PA). The prospects of a deal between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and PA President Mahmoud Abbas are slim, since Abbas already rejected former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's far-reaching proposals -- the sort of offer Netanyahu would never make. This diplomatic stalemate discredits moderates and plays into the hands of extremists on both sides who refuse to make the concessions that any viable peace treaty will require. Since an extended impasse is so dangerous, the best option for both the Israelis and the Palestinians is to seek a less ambitious agreement that transforms the situation on the ground and creates momentum for further negotiations by establishing a Palestinian state within armistice boundaries. In diplomatic terms, this formula would go beyond phase two of George W. Bush's 2002 "road map for peace," which proposed a Palestinian state with provisional boundaries, by striving to reach interim agreements on all the issues but stopping short of actually resolving the final-status issues of Jerusalem, the fate of the Palestinian refugees, and permanent boundaries, which were envisioned as phase three of Bush's road map.
  • Key Dates in Israel's History

    Key Dates in Israel's History

    Key Dates In Israel's History February 14, 1896 Publication of Theodor Herzl's treatise "The Jewish State" August 29, 1897 Opening of the First Zionist Congress at Basel, Switzerland November 2, 1917 Issuing of BoBoBoBoyyyycottcottcottcott (on the Jewish community of Palestine) July 22, 1946 Irgun bombs King David Hotel February 14, 1947 Britain gives UN responsibility for Palestine November 29, 1947 UNUNUNUN P PPParararartitiontitiontitiontition Plan PlanPlanPlan approved (Resolution 181) May 14, 1948 DeclarationDeclarationDeclarationDeclaration of ofofof th thththeeee State StateStateState of ofofof Israel IsraelIsraelIsrael May 15, 1948 Outbreak of WWWWarararar of ofofof In InInIndependependependependendendendencececece. Ends January 1949 1 / 11 January 25, 1949 Israel's first national election; David Ben-Gurion elected Prime Minister May 1950 Operation Ali Baba; brings 113,000 Iraqi Jews to Israel September 1950 Operation Magic Carpet; 47,000 Yemeni Jews to Israel Oct. 29-Nov. 6, 1956 Suez Campaign October 10, 1959 Creation of Fatah January 1964 Creation of PPPPalestinalestinalestinalestineeee Liberation LiberationLiberationLiberation Or OrOrOrganizationganizationganizationganization (PLO) January 1, 1965 Fatah first major attack: try to sabotage Israel’s water system May 15-22, 1967 Egyptian Mobilization in the Sinai/Closure of the Tiran Straits June 5-10, 1967 SixSixSixSix Da DaDaDayyyy W WWWarararar November 22, 1967 Adoption of UNUNUNUN Security SecuritySecuritySecurity Coun CounCounCouncilcilcilcil Reso ResoResoResolutionlutionlutionlution
  • Routledge Handbook of U.S. Counterterrorism and Irregular

    Routledge Handbook of U.S. Counterterrorism and Irregular

    ‘A unique, exceptional volume of compelling, thoughtful, and informative essays on the subjects of irregular warfare, counter-insurgency, and counter-terrorism – endeavors that will, unfortunately, continue to be unavoidable and necessary, even as the U.S. and our allies and partners shift our focus to Asia and the Pacific in an era of renewed great power rivalries. The co-editors – the late Michael Sheehan, a brilliant comrade in uniform and beyond, Liam Collins, one of America’s most talented and accomplished special operators and scholars on these subjects, and Erich Marquardt, the founding editor of the CTC Sentinel – have done a masterful job of assembling the works of the best and brightest on these subjects – subjects that will continue to demand our attention, resources, and commitment.’ General (ret.) David Petraeus, former Commander of the Surge in Afghanistan, U.S. Central Command, and Coalition Forces in Afghanistan and former Director of the CIA ‘Terrorism will continue to be a featured security challenge for the foreseeable future. We need to be careful about losing the intellectual and practical expertise hard-won over the last twenty years. This handbook, the brainchild of my late friend and longtime counter-terrorism expert Michael Sheehan, is an extraordinary resource for future policymakers and CT practitioners who will grapple with the evolving terrorism threat.’ General (ret.) Joseph Votel, former commander of US Special Operations Command and US Central Command ‘This volume will be essential reading for a new generation of practitioners and scholars. Providing vibrant first-hand accounts from experts in counterterrorism and irregular warfare, from 9/11 until the present, this book presents a blueprint of recent efforts and impending challenges.
  • The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: Historical and Prospective Intervention Analyses

    The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: Historical and Prospective Intervention Analyses

    Special Conflict Report The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: Historical and Prospective Intervention Analyses October 18-20, 2002 Waging Peace. Fighting Disease. Building Hope. The Carter Center strives to relieve suffering by advancing peace and health worldwide; it seeks to prevent and resolve conflicts, enhance freedom and democracy, and protect and promote human rights worldwide. The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: Historical and Prospective Intervention Analyses October 18–20, 2002 One Copenhill 453 Freedom Parkway Atlanta, GA 30307 (404) 420-5185 Fax (404) 420-3862 www.cartercenter.org July 2003 The Carter Center The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Foreword eptember will mark the 25th anniversary one environment may be useful in addressing similar of the Camp David Peace Accords. That issues in a totally different environment. In this historic moment remains the high-water report, we strive to distill the most important mark for diplomacy in the Middle East. elements that emerged from two days of discussions To this day, not one element of that agree- into a brief and useful document that may provide Sment has been violated; Egypt and Israel remain at insights on how to advance discussions regarding peace. September also will mark the 10th anniversary the final settlement of the Israel-Palestine conflict of the Oslo Peace Accords, which provided the first once that stage is reached. real opportunity to resolve perhaps the most difficult I would like to express my appreciation to those of the remaining elements required for regional peace participants: Professor Mari Fitzduff from INCORE and stability: an agreement between Israel and its in Belfast; Joseph Montville, formerly director of Palestinian neighbors.
  • Barriers to Peace in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

    Barriers to Peace in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

    The Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies Founded by the Charles H. Revson Foundation Barriers to Peace in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Editor: Yaacov Bar-Siman-Tov 2010 Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies – Study no. 406 Barriers to Peace in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Editor: Yaacov Bar-Siman-Tov The statements made and the views expressed are solely the responsibility of the authors. © Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Israel 6 Lloyd George St. Jerusalem 91082 http://www.kas.de/israel E-mail: [email protected] © 2010, The Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies The Hay Elyachar House 20 Radak St., 92186 Jerusalem http://www.jiis.org E-mail: [email protected] This publication was made possible by funds granted by the Charles H. Revson Foundation. In memory of Professor Alexander L. George, scholar, mentor, friend, and gentleman The Authors Yehudith Auerbach is Head of the Division of Journalism and Communication Studies and teaches at the Department of Political Studies of Bar-Ilan University. Dr. Auerbach studies processes of reconciliation and forgiveness . in national conflicts generally and in the Israeli-Palestinian context specifically and has published many articles on this issue. Yaacov Bar-Siman-Tov is a Professor of International Relations at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and holds the Chair for the Study of Peace and Regional Cooperation. Since 2003 he is the Head of the Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies. He specializes in the fields of conflict management and resolution, peace processes and negotiations, stable peace, reconciliation, and the Arab-Israeli conflict in particular. He is the author and editor of 15 books and many articles in these fields.
  • Israel - Palestine Conflict - a Tale of Grave Human Violations & Innumerable Casualties

    Israel - Palestine Conflict - a Tale of Grave Human Violations & Innumerable Casualties

    RESEARCH PAPER Law Volume : 4 | Issue : 9 | September 2014 | ISSN - 2249-555X Israel - Palestine Conflict - A Tale of Grave Human Violations & Innumerable Casualties KEYWORDS Mr.Manish Dalal Mr.ArunKumar Singh Assistant Professor in Law Noida International First year, Faculty of Law, Noida International University University * Corresponding author ABSTRACT Israel - Palestine conflict is one of the most burning issues of modern times which poses a big threat to international peace & security. This conflict is an example of grave human rights violations & a large no. of human causalities’. The warring sides are the Israeli government on the one hand and a group named Hamas which is controlling Gaza Strip after winning the elections in 2006 on the other hand. Hamas is mostly viewed as a terrorist organization all over the world. Both Israel & Hamas do not recognize each other's authority & ready to use violence to achieve their means. But to understand the reasons for this conflict one has to go back to history in the middle of 20th century where it all started. Introduction The First Palestinian Intifada The history of this war dates back to the year 1948 with The First Palestinian Intifada also known as a the first Pal- the declaration of State of Israel on 15th May, 1948 which estinian uprising against the Israeli occupation began on didn’t go down well with the Arab League which pro- 8th December, 1987 & ended on 13th September, 1993 claimed that the entire area given to Israel belongs to with the signing of Oslo Accords. It was the first biggest them & it didn’t recognize Israel as a State giving rise to uprising against Israel after their 1967 occupation of the 1948 Arab-Israel war in which many people lost their lives disputed territory of Gaza Strip, West Bank & East Jerusa- & many more became refugees.
  • The Annapolis Conference: a Chronic Case of Too Little, Too Late?

    The Annapolis Conference: a Chronic Case of Too Little, Too Late?

    THE ANNAPOLIS CONFERENCE: A CHRONIC CASE OF TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE? A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The School of Continuing Studies and of The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In Liberal Studies By Marta P. Silva, B.A. Georgetown University Washington, D.C. December 1, 2010 THE ANNAPOLIS CONFERENCE: A CHRONIC CASE OF TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE? Marta P. Silva, B.A. Mentor: Ralph Nurnberger, Ph.D. ABSTRACT On November 26- 27, 2007, President George W. Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice organized the Annapolis Peace Conference, the first international conference to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on American soil. It was held at the United States Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland. The conference brought together representatives from 49 states and organizations. The presence of such a diverse group demonstrated strong support for a resolution to the Israeli-conflict and for Ehud Olmert, Prime Minister of Israel and Mahmoud Abbas, President of the Palestinian National Authority as peace negotiators. This thesis analyzes why the Annapolis Peace Conference failed to resolve the Israel-Palestinian conflict. The United States’ long term myopia to the geopolitical realities of the Jewish/Muslim relationship has caused a pernicious, on-going stalemate in the Middle East. The discussion here begins with the analysis of the Bush administration’s policies throughout the two terms and then looks at the yearlong events leading up to the conference. The analysis concludes that the Bush administration’s lack of concern for the conflict during the President’s first term; the geopolitical fallout from the attacks on September 11, 2001; lack of enforcement of the Annapolis Peace Conference provisions; ii missed diplomatic and political leverage opportunities; and the political weakness of all three leaders during and after the Annapolis Peace Conference led to the failure of the Annapolis Peace Conference.
  • Beyond Annapolis. the Case for a Stronger EU Engagement by Muriel Asseburg and Volker Perthes*

    Beyond Annapolis. the Case for a Stronger EU Engagement by Muriel Asseburg and Volker Perthes*

    BEPA Monthly Brief - Issue 12, February 2008 1 Beyond Annapolis. The Case for a Stronger EU Engagement By Muriel Asseburg and Volker Perthes* In January 2008 peace making on the Israeli- and Ramallah and the Palestinian Authority has Palestinian track was relegated, once more, to focused on restoring law and order in West Bank the backburner. Israeli and Palestinian leaders cities. Yet, other Phase One commitments have were consumed by crisis management as not seen any progress. Neither have significant increased rocket fire on Israel had prompted an steps been taken to normalise Palestinian life, intensified blockade of the Gaza Strip and the nor have settlement outposts been dismantled or break-out of hundreds of thousands of Gaza building in settlements stopped effectively. residents after militants linked to Hamas had Palestinian institutions in East Jerusalem have blown open the border fence to Egypt. Those in not been reopened. And with the political split charge of the negotiations were also focused on between West Bank and Gaza Strip persisting, their own political survival. Israeli Prime comprehensive political reform in preparation Minister Ehud Olmert was under pressure to for Palestinian statehood has become illusory. resign in the context of the publication of the Moreover, the Annapolis process does not offer Winograd Committee’s final report. The stand- any constructive way of overcoming that split. It off between the adverse Palestinian governments rather builds on the “West Bank first” strategy in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip endured. adopted by the international community in Renewed peace process efforts kicked off with reaction to Hamas’ violent assumption of power great fanfare by the American administration in in the Gaza Strip last June.