DOCSLIB.ORG

ΣΆΣΠΕΙΡΕΣ / ΣΑΥΑΡΟΙ / ΣΑΒΕΙΡΟΙ in the 5Th CENTURY BC to the 8Th CENTURY AD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ΣΆΣΠΕΙΡΕΣ / ΣΑΥΑΡΟΙ / ΣΑΒΕΙΡΟΙ in the 5Th CENTURY BC to the 8Th CENTURY AD Japanese Slavic and East European Studies Vol.37. 2016 ARTICLES ΣΆΣΠΕΙΡΕΣ / ΣΑΥΑΡΟΙ / ΣΑΒΕΙΡΟΙ IN THE 5th CENTURY BC TO THE 8th CENTURY AD Anton Salmin Department of the Eastern Slavs and Peoples of European Russia at the Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera) of the Russian Academy of Sciences Altogether, historians have identified the ethnonyms Σάπειρες, Σάσπειρες, Σάβιροι, Sapires, Savares, and Saviri.1 In the lower reaches of the Volga and in Volga Bulgaria, they were already known as Suvars. The aim of this paper is to give a historical chronology of this tribe from the 5th century BC to the 8th century AD . As Herodotus tells us in his History, the Achaemenid King Darius I (522–486 BC) divided the Persian state into 20 provinces (satrapies). Having established these divisions, he appointed men to rule them and instituted the payment of tribute from each tribe . The capital of the state was the city of Persepolis . The country had a single monetary system based on the gold daric weighing 8.2 grams and the silver siglos weighing 5.6 grams. The Matienians, Saspeirians (Σάσπειρες), and Alarodians were allotted to the 18th province and commanded to pay Darius 200 talents. The Alarodians and Saspeirians went on campaigns equipped like the Colchians, that is to say, they wore wooden helmets and carried small shields of uncured leather, short spears, and daggers.2 In the year 333 BC, Alexander the Great defeated Darius III at the Battle of Issus, and, as a result, Asia Minor was lost to the Persians. In roughly the first half of the 3rd century BC, Apollonius of Rhodes wrote about the Sapirs / Sapeires (Σάπειρες) who had “long been living” next to the tribes called the Becheiri and Byzeres 3. The reference is to lands to the south of the Çoruh River, while the Becheiri lived in the area between Trebizond (Trabzon) and the Black Sea.4 17 Anton Salmin Beginning with thee, O Phoebus, I will recount the famous deeds of men of old, who, at the behest of King Pelias, down through the mouth of Pontus and between the Cyanean rocks, sped well-benched Argo in quest of the golden fleece. That is how the splendid Argonautica, by the Greek poet Apollonius of Rho- des, begins. The band of brave men who have gathered to sail to distant Colchis is told by the blind soothsayer Phineus (a son of Agenor, a former king of Thrace) which tribes they will encounter on their way. Among those mentioned are the Sa- peires . The Argonautica is an epic work, very close in subject matter to Homer’s Odyssey and Iliad. Paraphrasing a researcher of the Cimmerians,5 we can ask: “Where did the author of The Argonautica learn the real name of the Sapirs?” The answer is simple: his main protagonists, Pelias and Jason, were historical personages. Pelias was a man who seized royal power by force; Jason was his nephew, the son of King Aeson of Iolcos, and Alcimede / Polymede. The entire plot is constructed around them and the scheming around the throne. Of pri- mary significance for us, however, is the Greeks’ knowledge of the real picture of the peoples populating the southeast coast of Pontus. “Of course, it cannot be a question of proper localization, since the action... takes place in a mythi- cal, rather than a real world, but the use of real-life geographical details in the description of these journeys cannot be denied.”6 Many of Askold Ivanchik’s assertions about the Odyssey author’s sources about the Cimmerians and the Black Sea also have a direct logical bearing on The Argonautica, for example, the identification of the Pontic Colchis with Aea / Aia and the Black Sea with the Ocean. Thus, in any case, the references are to the true situation in the Black Sea region. Incidentally, these details had already appeared in the works of authors of the 8th–6th centuries BC 7. In the 8th century, mariners, followed by settlers, established more than 900 trading posts and settlements in the Propontis (Sea of Marmara); however, the largest were in Colchis. By the 5th–4th centuries BC, the Greeks already had a precise picture of the boundaries of the world that they had made their home. Moreover, researchers write of mixed marriages between the newcomers and the local tribes 8. At the very least, we can speak with cer- tainty about the reality of the ethnonyms Βεχείρες, Σάπειρες, and Βύζηράς that Apollonius of Rhodes used in his Argonautica . 18 ΣΆΣΠΕΙΡΕΣ / ΣΑΥΑΡΟΙ / ΣΑΒΕΙΡΟΙ in the 5th century BC to the 8th century AD Ptolemy wrote about the Savirs, in the form of Σαύαƍοι in the Caucasus, below the Aorsi and the Pagyritae, in the second half of the 2nd century AD .9 For that reason, scholars justly speak of the appearance of the Savirs, and also the Barsils, in the Northern Caucasus “already in the pre-Hunnish period.”10 The historian Vasilii Dimitriev agreed with Ptolemy’s assertion about the pre- sence of a group of Savirs in the Northern Caucasus in the 2nd century11 and considered that the ancestors of the Chuvash were located there “in the 2nd and 3rd centuries.”12 In the first half of the 3rd century, the Greek grammarian Herodian (Aelius Herodianus) wrote of tribes called σάπεϱ / σάπειϱ.13 In the early 3rd century, a military-political alliance of the nomads living in the northwestern Caspian basin passed through the Gate of Chor (i. e., the Derbent Gate), crossed the Kura River, and invaded Armenia. Researchers draw on the works of Movses Khorenatsi and Bardaisan and correctly suppose that those nomads definitely included Khazirs (Khazars) and Basils (Barsils).14 However, taking into account the overall historical and geographical situation, it is also possible to say that the nomads who attacked the Armenian lands included both Huns and Savirs . Ammianus Marcellinus records the Sapires in the year 361–362.15 That is why researchers of the history of the Caucasus hold the opinion that the Savirs / Sabirs began to penetrate into the steppe and foothills’ tableland zone of the Northern Caucasus no later than the first centuries AD.16 Matters become clearer from the 5th century, when, as active participants in the Perso-Byzantine wars, the Savirs / Sabirs (Σάβειϱοι) were drawn into in- teraction with the Persians, Eastern Romans, Ugrian tribes, Avars, Armenians, Alans, and Laz.17 Stephanus of Byzantium, describing events of the 5th century, mentions the Sapirs / Savirs / Sabirs (Σάπείϱεϛ / Σάβείϱεϛ) living on the River Akampis (Çoruh) between Colchis and Persia.18 In the early period of Caucasian history, the Savirs were often confused with other tribes, primarily with the Huns. “...the Huns, like a kind of very fertile sod of exceedingly strong tribes, expanded with two-pronged ferocity against other peoples. Some of these are called Altziagiri, others Sabiri; and they have separate dwelling places,” Jordanes wrote of the tribes that made up the core of the Hunnish confederation .19 Actually, the Huns themselves comprised only a small fraction of their forces. The great mass was made up of allies and con- quered tribes. 19 Anton Salmin Attila became the sole leader of the Hunnish union after violently ousting his own brother, Blida / Bleda (Βλήδα / Bleda), in 445. He then united many tribes and completely usurped power. Until Attila’s death, only isolated episodes are recorded in which the Savirs / Sabirs displayed particular bravery in combat. On all other occasions, the Savirs acted as part of Attila’s forces and were called Huns, or, at best, “Hunno-Savirs,” or, “the Huns called Savirs.” After the death of Attila in 453 and the break-up of the Hunnish union into autonomous tribes in the Caucasus, the Savir confederation acquired a dominant role. The Onogur state fell apart and was replaced by a new military and politi- cal union led by the Savirs. It included Huns and Bulgars. “The disintegration of the first Hunno-Bulgarian amalgamation led by the Onogurs caused the start of a parallel process of unification among the nomads of eastern Ciscaucasia and the emergence of a new military and political union led by the Sabirs.”20 In roughly the year 463, the Savirs, who lived a nomadic existence in the steppes north of the Caucasus, attacked the Saragur, Ugor, and Onogur. In turn, the Saragur encroached on the lands of the Acatzir. This action was prompted by the Savirs / Sabirs (Σαβίϱων) themselves being attacked by the Avars, while the Avars themselves had been driven out by tribes living on the coast.21 The majority of scholars accept this date from Priscus of Panium’s History as the first mention of the Savirs; however, variations of the ethnonym “Savirs” were known several centuries before that. To be more exact, in the original work by Priscus, the reference is not precisely to the year 463 but to the period 461–465, as it is not possible from what he writes to assign the event to a particular year — it began appearing in research thanks to someone’s infectious initiative. In the second half of the fifth century, the Savirs settled in the region of the Kuma River along the Caspian Sea. As we see, the ethnonym Σάβειϱοι again crops up actively in Byzantine sources after the death of Attila . In the early 460s, the Savirs / Sabirs forced the Onogur to leave the lands they had occupied and move to the west of the Ciscaucasian region. This left the southeastern nomadic territory completely under the control of the Savirs .22 On the basis of available data, it is possible to form a hypothesis as to how the Savirs would have been armed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Crimean Khanate, Ottomans and the Rise of the Russian Empire*
    STRUGGLE FOR EAST-EUROPEAN EMPIRE: 1400-1700 The Crimean Khanate, Ottomans and the Rise of the Russian Empire* HALİL İNALCIK The empire of the Golden Horde, built by Batu, son of Djodji and the grand son of Genghis Khan, around 1240, was an empire which united the whole East-Europe under its domination. The Golden Horde empire comprised ali of the remnants of the earlier nomadic peoples of Turkic language in the steppe area which were then known under the common name of Tatar within this new political framework. The Golden Horde ruled directly över the Eurasian steppe from Khwarezm to the Danube and över the Russian principalities in the forest zone indirectly as tribute-paying states. Already in the second half of the 13th century the western part of the steppe from the Don river to the Danube tended to become a separate political entity under the powerful emir Noghay. In the second half of the 14th century rival branches of the Djodjid dynasty, each supported by a group of the dissident clans, started a long struggle for the Ulugh-Yurd, the core of the empire in the lower itil (Volga) river, and for the title of Ulugh Khan which meant the supreme ruler of the empire. Toktamish Khan restored, for a short period, the unity of the empire. When defeated by Tamerlane, his sons and dependent clans resumed the struggle for the Ulugh-Khan-ship in the westem steppe area. During ali this period, the Crimean peninsula, separated from the steppe by a narrow isthmus, became a refuge area for the defeated in the steppe.
    [Show full text]
  • Sittas — Wódz Justyniana
    ROZPRAWY TERESA WOLIŃSKA Uniwersytet Łódzki Katedra Historii Bizancjum Sittas — wódz Justyniana Jednym z najbardziej zaufanych ludzi Justyniana I w początkowym okresie je­ go panowania, a zarazem jedną z najważniejszych osobistości w Bizancjum, był bez wątpienia Sittas. Uzdolnienia tego wybitnego wodza porównuje się z talentem Belizariusza, od którego był niewiele starszy i z którym prawie równocześnie rozpo­ czynał karierę. Niskie pochodzenie nie przeszkodziło mu w osiągnięciu najwyższych zaszczytów, nie tylko na polu wojskowym1. Jako magister militum prae­sentalis był najwyższym rangą dowódcą wojskowym w państwie2. Dzięki małżeństwu z Komito, starszą siostrą cesarzowej Teodory, spowinowacił się z rodziną cesarską3. Mimo ogromnych zasług i bardzo wysokiej pozycji w państwie, Sittas jest dla nas postacią bardzo tajemniczą. Niewiele wiemy o jego pochodzeniu i początkach kariery. Tak naprawdę nie mamy pewności nawet co do jego imienia. Występuje ono w źródłach w bardzo zróżnicowanych formach: a) S{tta34, b) Zt{tta35, 1 A.A.Czekałow a, Narod­ i­ senatorskaja­ aristokracija­ Konstantinopola­ w­ VI­ wiekie, „Wi­ zantijskij Wriemiennik”, t. XXXII, 1971, s. 25. 2 Joannis Malalae Chronographia, Bonnae 1831, s. 465 [dalej: M a l a l a s ], A. D e m a n d t, Die­Spätantike.­Römische­Geschichte­von­Diocletian­bis­Justinian, München 1989, s. 200; E. S t e i n , Histoire­du­Bas­Empire, przeł. J.–R. P a l a n q u e, t. II: De­la­disparition­de­l’Empire­d’Occident­à­la mort­de­Justinien, Paris–Bruxelles, 1959, cz. 2, s. 291; E. S t e i n, Sittas, [w:] Realencyclopädie­der klassischen­Altertumswissenschaft [dalej: RE], t.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunnic Warfare in the Fourth and Fifth Centuries C.E.: Archery and the Collapse of the Western Roman Empire
    HUNNIC WARFARE IN THE FOURTH AND FIFTH CENTURIES C.E.: ARCHERY AND THE COLLAPSE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE A Thesis Submitted to the Committee of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Science. TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada © Copyright by Laura E. Fyfe 2016 Anthropology M.A. Graduate Program January 2017 ABSTRACT Hunnic Warfare in the Fourth and Fifth Centuries C.E.: Archery and the Collapse of the Western Roman Empire Laura E. Fyfe The Huns are one of the most misunderstood and mythologized barbarian invaders encountered by the Roman Empire. They were described by their contemporaries as savage nomadic warriors with superior archery skills, and it is this image that has been written into the history of the fall of the Western Roman Empire and influenced studies of Late Antiquity through countless generations of scholarship. This study examines evidence of Hunnic archery, questions the acceptance and significance of the “Hunnic archer” image, and situates Hunnic archery within the context of the fall of the Western Roman Empire. To achieve a more accurate picture of the importance of archery in Hunnic warfare and society, this study undertakes a mortuary analysis of burial sites associated with the Huns in Europe, a tactical and logistical study of mounted archery and Late Roman and Hunnic military engagements, and an analysis of the primary and secondary literature. Keywords: Archer, Archery, Army, Arrow, Barbarian, Bow, Burial Assemblages, Byzantine, Collapse, Composite Bow, Frontier, Hun, Logistics, Migration Period, Roman, Roman Empire, Tactics, Weapons Graves ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my thesis advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Reshaping East Roman Diplomacy with Barbarians During the 5Th Century
    Chapter 1 From Hegemony to Negotiation: Reshaping East Roman Diplomacy with Barbarians during the 5th Century Audrey Becker Introduction During the first half of the 4th century ad, thanks to their military power, the Romans had been giving the barbarian tribes bordering the Danube and the Rhine no choice but to accept the conclusion of deditio after losing the war, leav- ing them in a very humiliating position.1 Yet, the military and political events of the second half of the 4th century ad, and even more of the 5th century ad, led the Romans to reconsider their relationship with the barbarian tribes.2 The characteristics of diplomatic relationship changed even before the defeat at Andrinople in 378, because the barbarian tribes, in the middle of the 4th cen- tury, gradually became able to restore the balance of power, leading the Eastern Roman Empire to reconsider its relations with its barbarian neighbours. This compelled the Byzantine Empire, from the end of the 4th century onward, to take into account barbarian leaders or kings who became, at that time, real dip- lomatic actors playing, of necessity, with formal rules of diplomatic protocol to 1 For instance, Constantinus with the Sarmatians in 323: Zosimus, Historia Nova 2.21.3, ed.Paschoud (Paris, 2000), p. 92; Julian in 358 with the Alemanni kings Suomarius and Hor- tarius: Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 17.10.3, ed. Sabbah (Paris, 1989), p. 64; Ammianus Marcellinus 17.10.9, p. 66; Constantius ii, in 358 as well, with the kings of the Sarmatians and Quadi: Ammianus Marcellinus 17.12.9–16, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MAIN RULES of TRIBUTE PAYMENT in MID 5Th CENTURY ATHENIAN ARCHE ACCORDING to CLEINIAS DECREE
    GRAECO-LATINA BRUNENSIA 20, 2015, 1 LUKÁŠ KUBALA (MASARYK UNIVERSITY, BRNO) THE MAIN RULES OF TRIBUTE PAYMENT IN MID 5th CENTURY ATHENIAN ARCHE ACCORDING TO CLEINIAS DECREE The main priority of my paper is to point out, through epigraphic sources and evidence from the 5th century Athens, one of the most characteristic features and objectives of Athenian “imperialism” during the last two decades of the period called Pentekontaetia (the period of fifty years – 479–431 B.C.). I will especially focus my attention on one of the most important epigraphic sources from this period – Cleinias decree (448/7, 425/4(?) B.C.). The impor- tance of this decree is significant, because it puts an exact view on the process of collection of the tribute (foros) in the mid-5th century Athenian arche. The financial regulations pre- scribed in the decree were valid for all members of the Athenian arche, and had a great im- pact on restriction of their autonomy at the expense of growth of Athenian dominance in the symmachy. The main objective I want to achieve in this paper, the importance of epigraphic material and evidence as one of the most important (and in some cases irreplaceable) sourc- es of information about the image of Athenian “imperialism” and Athenian relationship towards their subject-allies in the 5th century B.C. The reason why I choose particularly this decree as a representative type of epigraphic evidence, is to show how important the annual collection of the tribute was for the Athenians, and how the Athenians used the collection of the foros, as Isocrates mentions to “publicly humiliate” the allies and how they strengthened their hegemonic position in Delian symmachy transforming it into their own thalassocratic “empire” and allies into their “subjects”.
    [Show full text]
  • N.I.Il`Minskii and the Christianization of the Chuvash
    Durham E-Theses Narodnost` and Obshchechelovechnost` in 19th century Russian missionary work: N.I.Il`minskii and the Christianization of the Chuvash KOLOSOVA, ALISON,RUTH How to cite: KOLOSOVA, ALISON,RUTH (2016) Narodnost` and Obshchechelovechnost` in 19th century Russian missionary work: N.I.Il`minskii and the Christianization of the Chuvash, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11403/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 1 Narodnost` and Obshchechelovechnost` in 19th century Russian missionary work: N.I.Il`minskii and the Christianization of the Chuvash PhD Thesis submitted by Alison Ruth Kolosova Material Abstract Nikolai Il`minskii, a specialist in Arabic and the Turkic languages which he taught at the Kazan Theological Academy and Kazan University from the 1840s to 1860s, became in 1872 the Director of the Kazan Teachers‟ Seminary where the first teachers were trained for native- language schools among the Turkic and Finnic peoples of the Volga-Urals and Siberia.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion, Power and Nationhood in Sovereign Bashkortostan
    Religion, State & Society, Vo!. 25, No. 3, 1997 Religion, Power and Nationhood in Sovereign Bashkortostan SERGEI FILATOV Relations between the nation-state and religion are always paradoxical, an effort to square the circle. Spiritual life, the search for the absolute and worship belong to a sphere which is by nature free and not susceptible to control by authority. How can a president, a police officer or an ordinary patriot decide for an individual what consti­ tutes truth, goodness or personal salvation from sin and death? On the other hand, faith forms the national character, moral norms and the concept of duty, and so a sense of national identity and social order depend upon it. Understanding this, states and national leaders throughout human history have used God for the benefit of Caesar. Even priests themselves often forget whom it is they serve. In all historical circumstances, however, religious faith shows that it stands outside state, nation and society, and consistently betrays the plans and expectations of monarchs, presidents, secret police, collaborators and patriots. It changes regardless of any orders from those in authority. Peoples, states, empires and civilisations change fundamentally or vanish completely because the basic ideas which supported them also vanish. Sometimes it is the rulers themselves, striving to preserve their kingdoms, who are unaware that their faith and view of the world are changing and themselves turn out to be the medium of the changes which destroy them. In the countries of the former USSR, indeed in all the former socialist camp, constant attempts to 'tame the spirit' were in themselves nothing new, but the histor­ ical situation, the level of public awareness and the character of religiosity were unique; and the use of religion for national and state purposes therefore acquired distinctive and somewhat grotesque characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • 33 Hungarian Histories
    Miklós M. Molnár 33 HUNGARIAN HISTORIES HUNGARIAN IDENTITY THROUGH PORTRAITS www.CatchBudapest.com Table of Contents Preface ........................................................................................ 5 How to Read this Book (Preface by the Author) ............................. 6 In Search of Roots ....................................................................... 8 Attila the Hun, Our Hun ............................................................................. 9 Chief Árpád, The Founding Father ............................................................ 13 Sándor Kőrösi-Csoma, Seeking Hungarian roots, founding Tibetology .... 16 Ármin Vámbéry, The Dervish in Disguise ................................................. 19 Nation Builders ......................................................................... 23 Mátyás, The King in Disguise ................................................................... 24 István Széchenyi, The Greatest of the Magyars ........................................ 28 Albert Apponyi, The Architect of Trianon ................................................ 32 Mihály Károlyi, The Red Count ................................................................ 36 Anna Kéthly, A Friend of Social Justice, a Thorn in the Side of Politicians ................................................................................................. 40 László Rajk, The Man who was Buried Three Times ................................ 43 Voices .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/04/2021 08:59:36AM Via Free Access
    Chapter 12 Aristocrats, Mercenaries, Clergymen and Refugees: Deliberate and Forced Mobility of Armenians in the Early Medieval Mediterranean (6th to 11th Century a.d.) Johannes Preiser-Kapeller 1 Introduction Armenian mobility in the early Middle Ages has found some attention in the scholarly community. This is especially true for the migration of individuals and groups towards the Byzantine Empire. A considerable amount of this re- search has focused on the carriers and histories of individual aristocrats or noble families of Armenian origin. The obviously significant share of these in the Byzantine elite has even led to formulations such as Byzantium being a “Greco-Armenian Empire”.1 While, as expected, evidence for the elite stratum is relatively dense, larger scale migration of members of the lower aristocracy (“azat”, within the ranking system of Armenian nobility, see below) or non- aristocrats (“anazat”) can also be traced with regard to the overall movement of groups within the entire Byzantine sphere. In contrast to the nobility, however, the life stories and strategies of individuals of these backgrounds very rarely can be reconstructed based on our evidence. In all cases, the actual signifi- cance of an “Armenian” identity for individuals and groups identified as “Ar- menian” by contemporary sources or modern day scholarship (on the basis of 1 Charanis, “Armenians in the Byzantine Empire”, passim; Charanis, “Transfer of population”; Toumanoff, “Caucasia and Byzantium”, pp. 131–133; Ditten, Ethnische Verschiebungen, pp. 124–127, 134–135; Haldon, “Late Roman Senatorial Elite”, pp. 213–215; Whitby, “Recruitment”, pp. 87–90, 99–101, 106–110; Isaac, “Army in the Late Roman East”, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Things Fall Apart
    ChurchChurch HistoryHistory ChurchChurch HistoryHistory IntroductionIntroduction toto ChurchChurch HistoryHistory st rd TheThe AncientAncient ChurchChurch AD 11st-3-3rd centuriescenturies th th TheThe RiseRise ofof ChristendomChristendom AD 44th-5-5th centuriescenturies th th TheThe EarlyEarly MiddleMiddle AgesAges AD 66th-10-10th centuriescenturies th th TheThe AgeAge ofof CrusadesCrusades AD 1111th-13-13th centuriescenturies th th TheThe RenaissanceRenaissance AD 1414th-15-15th centuriescenturies th ConquestConquest andand ReformationReformation AD 1616th centurycentury th th TheThe AgeAge ofof EnlightenmentEnlightenment AD 1717th-18-18th centuriescenturies th TheThe AgeAge ofof RevolutionRevolution AD 1919th centurycentury th TheThe ModernModern AgeAge AD 2020th centurycentury st TheThe PostmodernPostmodern AgeAge AD 2121st centurycentury ChurchChurch HistoryHistory IntroductionIntroduction toto ChurchChurch HistoryHistory st rd TheThe AncientAncient ChurchChurch AD 11st-3-3rd centuriescenturies th th TheThe RiseRise ofof ChristendomChristendom AD 44th-5-5th centuriescenturies Constantine: The Thirteenth Apostle The First Ecumenical Council The Constantinian Line The Establishment of Christendom The Second Ecumenical Council Fathers of the New Church Things Fall Apart... TheThe RiseRise ofof ChristendomChristendom TheThe FallFall ofof thethe RomanRoman EmpireEmpire tooktook aa whilewhile 410410 AlaricAlaric andand hishis VisigothsVisigoths sackedsacked RomeRome ItIt waswas aa horrifichorrific threethree days,days, butbut thenthen itit
    [Show full text]
  • Governance on Russia's Early-Modern Frontier
    ABSOLUTISM AND EMPIRE: GOVERNANCE ON RUSSIA’S EARLY-MODERN FRONTIER DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Matthew Paul Romaniello, B. A., M. A. The Ohio State University 2003 Examination Committee: Approved by Dr. Eve Levin, Advisor Dr. Geoffrey Parker Advisor Dr. David Hoffmann Department of History Dr. Nicholas Breyfogle ABSTRACT The conquest of the Khanate of Kazan’ was a pivotal event in the development of Muscovy. Moscow gained possession over a previously independent political entity with a multiethnic and multiconfessional populace. The Muscovite political system adapted to the unique circumstances of its expanding frontier and prepared for the continuing expansion to its east through Siberia and to the south down to the Caspian port city of Astrakhan. Muscovy’s government attempted to incorporate quickly its new land and peoples within the preexisting structures of the state. Though Muscovy had been multiethnic from its origins, the Middle Volga Region introduced a sizeable Muslim population for the first time, an event of great import following the Muslim conquest of Constantinople in the previous century. Kazan’s social composition paralleled Moscow’s; the city and its environs contained elites, peasants, and slaves. While the Muslim elite quickly converted to Russian Orthodoxy to preserve their social status, much of the local population did not, leaving Moscow’s frontier populated with animists and Muslims, who had stronger cultural connections to their nomadic neighbors than their Orthodox rulers. The state had two major goals for the Middle Volga Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Jane Burbank New York University
    POLITICAL IMAGINATION AND IMPERIAL SOVEREIGNTY: THE CASE OF KAZAN An NCEEER Working Paper by Jane Burbank New York University National Council for Eurasian and East European Research University of Washington Box 353650 Seattle, WA 98195 [email protected] http://www.nceeer.org/ TITLE VIII PROGRAM Project Information* Principal Investigator: Jane Burbank NCEEER Contract Number: 824-01h Date: October 16, 2012 Copyright Information Individual researchers retain the copyright on their work products derived from research funded through a contract or grant from the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (NCEEER). However, the NCEEER and the United States Government have the right to duplicate and disseminate, in written and electronic form, reports submitted to NCEEER to fulfill Contract or Grant Agreements either (a) for NCEEER’s own internal use, or (b) for use by the United States Government, and as follows: (1) for further dissemination to domestic, international, and foreign governments, entities and/or individuals to serve official United States Government purposes or (2) for dissemination in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of the United States Government granting the public access to documents held by the United States Government. Neither NCEEER nor the United States Government nor any recipient of this Report may use it for commercial sale. * The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract or grant funds provided by the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research, funds which were made available by the U.S. Department of State under Title VIII (The Soviet-East European Research and Training Act of 1983, as amended).
    [Show full text]