DOCSLIB.ORG

Ivan Mišur GEODINAMSKA EVOLUCIJA METASEDIMENTNIH STIJENA NISKOG STUPNJA METAMORFIZMA NA MEDVEDNICI Doktorska Disertacija Zagre

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ivan Mišur GEODINAMSKA EVOLUCIJA METASEDIMENTNIH STIJENA NISKOG STUPNJA METAMORFIZMA NA MEDVEDNICI Doktorska Disertacija Zagre SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU PRIRODOSLOVNO-MATEMATIČKI FAKULTET GEOLOŠKI ODSJEK Ivan Mišur GEODINAMSKA EVOLUCIJA METASEDIMENTNIH STIJENA NISKOG STUPNJA METAMORFIZMA NA MEDVEDNICI Doktorska disertacija Zagreb, 2017. SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU PRIRODOSLOVNO-MATEMATIČKI FAKULTET GEOLOŠKI ODSJEK Ivan Mišur GEODINAMSKA EVOLUCIJA METASEDIMENTNIH STIJENA NISKOG STUPNJA METAMORFIZMA NA MEDVEDNICI Doktorska disertacija predložena Geološkom odsjeku Prirodoslovno-matematičkog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu radi stjecanja akademskog stupnja doktora prirodnih znanosti znanstveno polje geologija, grana mineralogija i petrologija Zagreb, 2017. Ova doktorska disertacija izrađena je na Zavodu za geologiju Hrvatskog geološkog instituta pod vodstvom prof.dr.sc. Dražena Balena te dr.sc. Mirka Belaka, višeg znanstvenog suradnika, u sklopu Doktorskog studija geologije na Geološkom odsjeku Prirodoslovno- matematičkog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. ZAHVALE Prof.dr.sc. Draženu Balenu i dr.sc. Mirku Belaku, na vodstvu i nesebičnoj pomoći. Prof.dr.sc. Balenu na savjetima i velikoj pomoći s geotermobarometrijskim računima i mjerenjima na mikrosondi. Dr.sc. Mirku Belaku hvala na prenesenom znanju iz terenskih i petrografskih istraživanja te potpori i podršci. Dr.sc. Mariji Horvat na svim savjetima i raspravama, podršci i pomoći. Prof.dr.sc. Ursu Klötzliju na konstruktivnim raspravama, prenesenom znanju iz geokronologije i na svim omogućenim analizama i posjetima laboratoriju za geokronologiju Sveučilišta u Beču. Prof.dr.sc. Hans-Joachim Massonneu na poduci iz modeliranja dijagrama pseudopresjeka i izopleta. Magdaleni Mandl na pomoći pri mjerenju cirkona na LA-ICP-MC-MS-u. Dr.sc. Lari Wachi na savjetima, podršci i pomoći pri mjerenju cirkona. Dr.sc. Aniti Grizelj, na trudu i pomoći pri analizi i inerpretaciji mjerenja na XRD-u. Puno hvala cimeru dr.sc. Mihovilu Brleku na pomoći, potpori, druženju i savjetima. Izv.prof.dr.sc. Blanki Cvetko Tešović veliko hvala za pomoć i savjete kroz obaveze na poslijediplomskom studiju na Prirodoslovno-matematičkom fakultetu i na podršci tijekom studija i izrade disertacije. Članovima komisije, prof.dr.sc. Darku Tibljašu, prof.dr.sc. Nenadu Tomašiću i prof.dr.sc. Bruni Tomljenoviću, na konstruktivnim savjetima i korekcijama. Dr.sc. Zorici Petrinec na savjetima oko disertacije. Dr.sc. Damiru Slovenecu, na logističkoj potpori i savjetima. Hvala svom osoblju odjela za litosferna istraživanja Sveučilišta u Beču, posebice Franzu Biedermannu, na prenesenom znanju rada u laboratoriju prilikom pripreme uzoraka. Hvala svom osoblju laboratorija za pripremu uzopraka Hrvatskog geološkog instituta, Tončeku, Mirjani, Dragici, Đurđici i Damiru koji su pomogli pri izradi preparata i separacijama cirkona. Kolegama Vlatku Brčiću, Tomislavu Kurečiću, Danijelu Ivaniševiću na podršci i savjetima. Hvala zaposlenicima Hrvatskog geološkog instituta koji su na bilo koji način pomogli pri izradi ove disertacije. Zaposlenicima Geološkog odsjeka PMF-a na prenesenom znanju. Prijateljima i kolegama s HGI-a, PMF-a, RGNF-a i šire koji su na bilo koji način pomogli tijekom izrade disertacije, ali najviše na prijateljstvu i podršci. Zahvaljujem se i Hrvatskom geološkom institutu (Zavod za geologiju) na ukazanom povjerenju, i financiranju ovog istraživanja. Veliko hvala roditeljima na požrtvovnosti, podršci, brizi i pomoći. Posebno se zahvaljujem Andrei za sve lijepe trenutke, podršci, pomoći, savjetima i potpori. SADRŽAJ 1. UVOD ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2. GEOLOGIJA ISTRAŽIVANOG PODRUČJA............................................................................... 4 2.1. POVIJESNI PREGLED ISTRAŽIVANJA ............................................................................. 4 2.2. GEOLOŠKI SMJEŠTAJ ISTRAŽIVANOG PODRUČJA ..................................................... 8 2.3. GEOLOŠKA GRAĐA .......................................................................................................... 13 3. MATERIJALI I METODE............................................................................................................ 19 3.1. MATERIJALI ....................................................................................................................... 19 3.1.1. UZORCI STIJENA ....................................................................................................... 19 3.1.2. CIRKON (ZrSiO4) ......................................................................................................... 19 3.1.3. MONACIT (Ce, La, Nd, Th)PO4 .................................................................................. 22 3.2. METODE .............................................................................................................................. 24 3.2.1. TERENSKA ISTRAŽIVANJA ..................................................................................... 24 3.2.1.1. TERENSKA ISTRAŽIVANJA LITOSTRATIGRAFSKE JEDINICE STARI POTOK………………………… ....................................................................... …..24 3.2.1.2. TERENSKA ISTRAŽIVANJA LITOSTRATIGRAFSKE JEDINICE SLANI POTOK………………… ................................................................................... …..26 3.2.1.3. TERENSKA ISTRAŽIVANJA LITOSTRATIGRAFSKE JEDINICE RISNJAK………………………… ................................................................... .…..29 3.2.1.4. TERENSKA ISTRAŽIVANJA LITOSTRATIGRAFSKE JEDINICE VILA REBAR………………… ............................................................................... ……..30 3.2.2. LABORATORIJSKA ISTRAŽIVANJA ................................................................. ….32 3.2.2.1. PETROGRAFSKI PREPARATI ......................................................................... ….32 3.2.2.2. RENDGENSKA DIFRAKCIJSKA ANALIZA (XRD) ...................................... ….32 3.2.2.3. ELEKTRONSKA MIKROSKOPIJA ................................................................. .….33 3.2.2.4. ISTRAŽIVANJA ELEKTRONSKOM MIKROSONDOM (EMP) ................... .….34 3.2.2.5. CIJELOSTIJENSKA KEMIJSKA ANALIZA INDUKTIVNO SPREGNUTOM PLAZMOM S MASENIM SPEKTROMETROM (ICP-MS) ............................ .….35 3.2.2.6. TOČNOST I PRECIZNOST PODATAKA ....................................................... .….36 3.2.2.7. ANALIZE CIRKONA METODAMA LASERSKE ABLACIJE (LA), INDUKTIVNO-SPREGNUTA PLAZMA (ICP), MULTIKOLEKTOR (MC) I MASENI SPEKTROMETAR (MS) ................................................................... .….40 3.2.2.8. MORFOLOGIJA CIRKONA ............................................................................. .….45 3.2.2.9. TERMODINAMSKI MODELI I IZRAČUNI ................................................... .….47 IV 3.2.2.9.1. GEOTERMOMETRIJSKA I GEOBAROMETRIJSKA ANALIZA ..... .….48 3.2.2.9.2. IZRADA FAZNOG DIJAGRAMA POMOĆU PERPLEX-a ................ .….50 3.2.2.9.3. KLORITNI GEOTERMOMETAR ........................................................ .….51 3.2.2.9.4. KLORIT – KLORITOIDNI GEOTERMOMETAR .............................. .….52 3.2.2.9.5. FENGITNI GEOBAROMETAR ........................................................... .….53 4. REZULTATI ................................................................................................................................. 54 4.1. LITOSTRATIGRAFSKA JEDINICA STARI POTOK ........................................................ 54 4.1.1. PETROGRAFSKA ANALIZA STIJENA JEDINICE STARI POTOK ....................... 54 4.1.2. RENDGENSKA DIFRAKCIJSKA ANALIZA STIJENA JEDINICE STARI POTOK … ............................................................................................................................. …..58 4.1.3. ICP-MS ANALIZA CIJELOSTIJENSKOG SASTAVA STIJENA LITOSTRATIGRAFSKE JEDINICE STARI POTOK ................................................ 60 4.1.4. ANALIZA UZORAKA LITOSTRATIGRAFSKE JEDINICE STARI POTOK ELEKTRONSKIM MIKROSKOPOM ......................................................................... 64 4.1.5. MJERENJA ELEKTRONSKOM MIKROSONDOM .................................................. 66 4.1.6. GEOTERMOBAROMETRIJSKA ANALIZA UZORKA KLORITOIDNOG ŠKRILJAVCA ............................................................................................................... 80 4.1.6.1. IZRADA DIJAGRAMA FAZNIH STABILNOSTI POMOĆU PROGRAMSKOG PAKETA PERPLE_X .............................................................................................. 80 4.1.6.2. GEOTERMOMETRIJA KLORITOIDNOG ŠKRILJAVCA .................................. 83 4.1.6.3. GEOBAROMETRIJSKI IZRAČUNI NA FENGITU IZ KLORITOIDNOG ŠKRILJAVCA .......................................................................................................... 86 4.1.7. IZOTOPNA MJERENJA NA CIRKONIMA (LA-MC-ICP-MS) ................................ 87 4.2. LITOSTRATIGRAFSKA JEDINICA SLANI POTOK ..................................................... 101 4.2.1. PETROGRAFSKA ANALIZA STIJENA JEDINICE SLANI POTOK ..................... 101 4.2.2. RENDGENSKA DIFRAKCIJSKA ANALIZA STIJENA JEDINICE SLANI POTOK …. ................................................................................................................................ 103 4.2.3. ICP-MS ANALIZA CIJELOSTIJENSKOG SASTAVA STIJENA LITOSTRATIGRAFSKE JEDINICE SLANI POTOK .............................................. 103 4.2.4. IZOTOPNA MJERENJA NA CIRKONIMA (LA-MC-ICP-MS) IZ UZORKA LITOSTRATIGRAFSKE JEDINICE SLANI POTOK .............................................. 106 4.3. LITOSTRATIGRAFSKA JEDINICA RISNJAK ..............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Microtectonic Measurements and Interpretation of the Mesozoic Formations in the Villány Hills and Görcsöny–Máriakéménd Ridge, Hungary
    Central European Geology, Vol. 53/1, pp. 21–42 (2010) DOI: 10.1556/CEuGeol.53.2010.1.2 Microtectonic measurements and interpretation of the Mesozoic formations in the Villány Hills and Görcsöny–Máriakéménd Ridge, Hungary Attila Petrik Department of Regional Geology Eötvös Lóránd University, Budapest Within the framework of a National Research Fund project, different types of scientific investigations were carried out with the aim of a comprehensive paleogeographic reconstruction of the Tisza structural unit. As part of this project microtectonic measurements in the area of the Villány Hills and Görcsöny–Máriakéménd Ridge were carried out. Several publications have already appeared concerning the structural development of the Mecsek–Villány area (Csontos and Bergerat 1988, 1993; Benkovics 1997; Csontos et al. 2002), but in these the Villány Hills and their surroundings played a secondary role compared to the Mecsek Mountains. The goal of the present study was to establish the limits of the structural phases and determine their relative and absolute ages. An important issue has been to clarify to what degree the suggested events of structural deformation could be integrated into regional geologic processes. The tectonic conditions of the area of interest were studied through description and analysis of structural elements of 12 investigated quarries within it. Calculated stress field data were also analyzed. Seven quarries in the Villány Hills, five in the Görcsöny–Máriakéménd area, the data of over 650 striae, 550 joints, various ductile deformation elements (folds, flexures) as well as stylolites, were recorded. Integrating these structural elements into the regional geologic processes was of significant importance. Introduction and geologic background The Tisza Unit (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • References Preface, Chapters 1, 2 and 3
    References Preface, Chapters 1, 2 and 3 Acosta J, Munoz A, Herranz P,Palomo C, Ballesteros M, Vaquero Beghein C, Resovsky JS, Trampert J (2002) P and S tomography M,Uchupi E (2002) Geodynamics of the Emile Baudot Escarp­ using normal-mode and surface waves data with a neighbour­ ment and the Balearic Promontory, western Mediterranean. hood algorithm. Geophys J Int 149:646-658 Mar Petrol GeoI18:349-369 Belousov VV,Volvovsky BS,Arkhipov IV,Buryanov VB,Evsyukov Aksu AE, Hiscott RN, Yasar D, Isler FI, Marsh S (2002a) Seismic YD, Goncharov VP, Gordienko VV, Ismagilov DF, Kislov GK, stratigraphy of Late Quaternary deposits from the southwest­ Kogan Ll,Kondyurin AV, Kozlov VN,Lebedev Ll, Lokholatnikov ern Black Sea shelf: evidence for non catastrophic variation in VM, Malovitsky YP, Moskalenko VN, Neprochnov YP, Ostisty sea level during the last 10.000 yr. Mar GeoI190:6-94 BK,Rusakov OM,Shimkus KM,Shlezinger AE,SochelnicovVV, Aksu AE et al. (2002b) Persistent Holocene outflow from the Black Sollogub VB, Solovyev VD, Starostenko VI, Starovoitov AF, Sea to the Eastern Mediterranean contradicts Noah's flood hy­ Terechov AA, Volvovsky IS, Shigunov AS, Zolotarev VG (1988) pothesis. GSA Today 12:4-10 Structure and evolution of the Earth's crust and upper mantle Aldinucci M, Cirilli S, Costantini A, Decandia FAet al. (2001) Stra­ of the Black Sea. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica e Applicata 30: tigraphic-structural evolution of the Late Paleozoic-Triassic 109-196 sequences of southern Tuscany (northern Apennines). Diparti­ Bernier P,Berne S,Rabineau M,Thollet G (2004) Last Glacial maxi­ mento di Scienze della Terra, Siena University, 72 pp mum shoreline position in the Gulf of Lions determined by Alleman F (2002) Erlauterungen zur Geologischen Karte des Fur­ lithified coastal sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • Heavy Minerals and Exotic Pebbles from the Eocene Flysch
    Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences Turkish J Earth Sci (2018) 27: 64-88 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/earth/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/yer-1707-9 Heavy minerals and exotic pebbles from the Eocene flysch deposits of the Magura Nappe (Outer Western Carpathians, eastern Slovakia): their composition and implications on the provenance 1, 2 † 3 Katarína BÓNOVÁ *, Ján BÓNA , Martin KOVÁČIK , Tomáš MIKUŠ 1 Institute of Geography, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia 2 Kpt. Jaroša 13, Košice, Slovakia 3 Earth Science Institute SAS, Geological Division, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia Received: 10.07.2017 Accepted/Published Online: 15.11.2017 Final Version: 08.01.2018 Abstract: The study aims to reconstruct the crystalline parent rock assemblages of the Eocene Strihovce Formation (Krynica Unit) and Mrázovce Member (Rača Unit) deposits, based on the heavy mineral suites, their corrosive features, geochemistry of garnet and tourmaline, zircon cathodoluminescence (CL) images, and exotic pebble composition. Both units are an integral part of the Magura Nappe belonging to the Flysch Belt (Outer Western Carpathians). Corrosion signs observable on heavy minerals point to different burial conditions and/or diverse sources. The compositions of the detrital garnets and tourmalines as well as the CL study of zircons indicate their origin in gneisses, mica schists, amphibolites, and granites in the source area. According to observed petrographic and mineralogical characteristics, palaeoflow data and palaeogeographical situation during the Eocene may show that the Tisza Mega- Unit crystalline complexes including a segment of the flysch substratum could represent the lateral (southern) input of detritus for the Krynica Unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Resource Analysis of Shale Gas and Shale Oil in Europe
    Draft Report for DG JRC in the Context of Contract JRC/PTT/2015/F.3/0027/NC "Development of shale gas and shale oil in Europe" European Unconventional Oil and Gas Assessment (EUOGA) Geological resource analysis of shale gas and shale oil in Europe Deliverable T4b mmmll Geological resource analysis of shale gas/oil in Europe June 2016 I 2 Geological resource analysis of shale gas/oil in Europe Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................. 3 Abstract ........................................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary ........................................................................................... 7 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 8 Item 4.1 Setup and distribute a template for uniformly describing EU shale plays to the National Geological Surveys .........................................................................12 Item 4.2 Elaborate and compile general and systematic descriptions of the shale plays from the NGS responses ....................................................................................15 T01, B02 - Norwegian-Danish-S. Sweden – Alum Shale .........................................16 T02 - Baltic Basin – Cambrian-Silurian Shales ......................................................22 T03 - South Lublin Basin, Narol Basin and Lviv-Volyn Basin – Lower Paleozoic Shales ......................................................................................................................37
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Geology Reviews
    Regional Geology Reviews Series Editors Roland Oberh€ansli Maarten de Wit Francois M. Roure For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/8643 . Ja´nos Haas Editor Ja´nos Haas • Ge´za Ha´mor{ •A´ ron Ja´mbor • Sa´ndor Kova´cs{ • Andra´s Nagymarosy • Tibor Szederke´nyi Geology of Hungary Editor Ja´nos Haas Eotv€ os€ Lora´nd University Geological, Geophysical and Space Science Research Group Budapest Hungary ISBN 978-3-642-21909-2 ISBN 978-3-642-21910-8 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-21910-8 Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2012936971 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Evaluation of the Mesozoic Complexes of Darnó Hill
    Central European Geology, Vol. 53/2–3, pp. 205–231 (2010) DOI: 10.1556/CEuGeol.53.2010.2–3.6 Re-evaluation of the Mesozoic complexes of Darnó Hill (NE Hungary) and comparisons with Neotethyan accretionary complexes of the Dinarides and Hellenides – preliminary data Sándor Kovács†, János Haas* Péter Ozsvárt Geological, Geophysical and Space Science Research Research Group for Paleontology Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest Hungarian Academy of Sciences-HNMH, Budapest Ladislav A. Palinkaš Gabriella Kiss, Ferenc Molnár Department of Mineralogy and Petrology Department of Mineralogy Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest Sándor Józsa Szilvia Kövér Department of Petrology, Faculty of Sciences Geological, Geophysical and Space Science Research Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Budapest The Mesozoic complex of Darnó Hill area in NE Hungary, according to well core documentation, is made up of two units. The upper unit, the Darnó Unit s.s., consists predominantly of blocks of ophiolitic rocks (pillow and massive basalt, gabbro) and subordinate abyssal sediments (red radiolarite and red pelagic mudstone of either Ladinian–Carnian or Bathonian–Callovian age, as well as bluish-grey, sometimes blackish siliceous shale of the latter age). The basalt is geochemically of MOR type, based on earlier evaluations. However, it comes in two types: reddish or greenish amygdaloidal pillow basalts with peperitic facies containing reddish micritic limestone inclusions, and green basalts without any sedimentary carbonate inclusion. The former type is probably Middle- Triassic, advanced rifting stage-related basalt, whereas the latter is probably of Jurassic age, corresponding to the Szarvaskõ-type basalt of the western Bükk Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alpine-Carpathian-Dinaridic Orogenic System: Correlation and Evolution of Tectonic Units
    1661-8726/08/010139–45 Swiss J. Geosci. 101 (2008) 139–183 DOI 10.1007/s00015-008-1247-3 Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2008 The Alpine-Carpathian-Dinaridic orogenic system: correlation and evolution of tectonic units STEFAN M. SCHMID 1, DANIEL BERNOULLI 1, BERNHARD FÜGENSCHUH 2, LIVIU MATENCO 3, SENECIO SCHEFER 1, RALF SCHUSTER 4, MATTHIAS TISCHLER 1 & KAMIL USTASZEWSKI 1 Key words: tectonics, collisional Orogens, Ophiolites, alps, Carpathians, Dinarides ABSTRACT A correlation of tectonic units of the Alpine-Carpathian-Dinaridic system of geometries resulting from out-of-sequence thrusting during Cretaceous and orogens, including the substrate of the Pannonian and Transylvanian basins, is Cenozoic orogenic phases underlay a variety of multi-ocean hypotheses, that presented in the form of a map. Combined with a series of crustal-scale cross were advanced in the literature and that we regard as incompatible with the sections this correlation of tectonic units yields a clearer picture of the three- field evidence. dimensional architecture of this system of orogens that owes its considerable The present-day configuration of tectonic units suggests that a former complexity to multiple overprinting of earlier by younger deformations. connection between ophiolitic units in West Carpathians and Dinarides was The synthesis advanced here indicates that none of the branches of the disrupted by substantial Miocene-age dislocations along the Mid-Hungarian Alpine Tethys and Neotethys extended eastward into the Dobrogea Orogen. Fault Zone, hiding a former lateral change in subduction polarity between Instead, the main branch of the Alpine Tethys linked up with the Meliata- West Carpathians and Dinarides. The SW-facing Dinaridic Orogen, mainly Maliac-Vardar branch of the Neotethys into the area of the present-day In- structured in Cretaceous and Palaeogene times, was juxtaposed with the Tisza ner Dinarides.
    [Show full text]
  • A Joint Report on Geomanifestations in the Pannonian Basin
    Project approved for funding as part of the ERA-NET GeoERA Authors and affiliation: Nina Rman, GeoZS Éva Kun, MBFSZ Natalija Samardžić, FZZG Dejan Šram, GeoZS Jure Atanackov, GeoZS Deliverable 4.2 Miloš Markič, GeoZS Andrej Lapanje, GeoZS Dušan Rajver, GeoZS A joint report on Ildikó Sarolta Selmeczi, MBFSZ geomanifestations in the Gyula Maros, MBFSZ Pannonian basin Tamara Marković, CGS-HGI Tamás Budai, MBFSZ Edit Babinszki, MBFSZ E-mail of contact person: [email protected] Version: 21.05.2021 This report is part of a project that has received funding by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 731166. Deliverable Data Deliverable number D4.2 Dissemination level Public Deliverable name A joint report on geomanifestations in the Pannonian basin Work package WP4, T4.2 Geomanifestations Lead WP/Deliverable beneficiary MBFSZ/GeoZS and MBFSZ Deliverable status Submitted (Author(s)) 21/05/2021 Rman Nina et al. Verified (WP leader) 24/05/2021 Gyula Maros Approved (Coordinator) 25/05/2021 Renata Barros TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 2 2 STRUCTURAL FRAMEWORK OF THE PANNONIAN BASIN ........................................ 3 2.1 The Pannonian Basin in the frame of the Alpine orogeny .............................................. 3 2.1.1 Pre-Pannonian phase ......................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Pannonian Basin evolution
    [Show full text]
  • Late Jurassic Mélanges in the Northern Calcareous Alps
    Chair of Geology and Economic Geology Master's Thesis A contribution of Middle – Late Jurassic Mélanges in the Northern Calcareous Alps (Raucherschober/Schafkogel) and the Inner Western Carpathians (Jaklovce) to the reconstruction of the Triassic – Jurassic passive and active Neo-Tethys distal continental margin Sebastian Paul Drvoderic, BSc May 2021 EIDESSTATTLICHE ERKLÄRUNG Ich erkläre an Eides statt, dass ich diese Arbeit selbständig verfasst, andere als die angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel nicht benutzt, und mich auch sonst keiner unerlaubten Hilfsmittel bedient habe. Ich erkläre, dass ich die Richtlinien des Senats der Montanuniversität Leoben zu "Gute wissenschaftliche Praxis" gelesen, verstanden und befolgt habe. Weiters erkläre ich, dass die elektronische und gedruckte Version der eingereichten wissenschaftlichen Abschlussarbeit formal und inhaltlich identisch sind. Datum: 10.05.2021 ________________________________________ Unterschrift Verfasser/in Sebastian Paul Drvoderic I DANKSAGUNG I would like to thank Ao.Univ.-Prof. Mag. et Dr.rer.nat. Hans-Jürgen Gawlick for supporting this master´s thesis in field work and data processing and Dr. Hisashi Suzuki (university Otani – Yapan) for age determinations of the radiolarians, as well as Dr. Felix Schlagintweit, for microfossil determinations. I also want to say thank you to the whole Department for Applied Geology for the provision of equipment and analysis devices. I do not want to miss the opportunity to thank my family for their support in all the years of my education and especially during my time at Montanuniversität. Finally, I say thank you to B. Steiner for the great support all around this study and more. II Kurzfassung Mélangen können grundlegende Erkenntnisse zu offenen Fragen der geodynamischen Entwicklung, paläogeographischen Rekonstruktionen und der von Gebirgen liefern.
    [Show full text]
  • Neotectonics and Its Relation to the Mid-Hungarian Mobile Belt
    EGU Stephan Mueller Special Publication Series, 3, 247–266, 2002 c European Geosciences Union 2002 Neotectonics and its relation to the Mid-Hungarian Mobile Belt K. D. Lorincz˝ 1, F. Horvath´ 2, and G. Detzky3 1MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas Co., Exploration and Production, H-1039 Budapest, Batthyany´ u. 45., Hungary 2Eotv¨ os¨ Lorand´ University, Geophysical Department, H-1117 Budapest, Pazm´ any´ P. s. 1/c, Hungary 3Eotv¨ os¨ Lorand´ Geophysical Institute of Hungary, H-1145 Budapest, Columbus u. 17–23., Hungary Received: 2 May 2001 – Accepted: 12 June 2002 Abstract. One of the most significant neotectonic zones of zontal stress axis shows a 90◦ clockwise rotation during the Hungary is the Mid-Hungarian mobile belt, which occupies Neogene through Quaternary from NW to NE. The horizon- a key position of the Carpathian-Pannonian region, because tal rotation of stress axes can be related to the shift of ter- it is located at the boundary of two terranes. The study area mination of subduction along the Carpathian arc. Complete is situated in this belt at the central part of the Great Hun- consumption of subductible lithosphere and, hence, onset of garian Plain, where on Mesozoic compressional structures continental collision exhibit a progressive time shift along two basins of different ages are superimposed: the Paleogene the arc from the Western towards the Eastern Carpathians. Szolnok flysch trough and the Neogene Pannonian basin. A detailed tectonic analysis was carried out in a 2 100×60 km area on the basis of integrated interpretation 1 Regional geology of seismic profiles of different penetration (deep, normal, and shallow) and borehole data.
    [Show full text]
  • Author's Personal Copy
    Author's personal copy Earth-Science Reviews 118 (2013) 45–68 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Earth-Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Widespread refertilization of cratonic and circum-cratonic lithospheric mantle Yan-Jie Tang a,⁎, Hong-Fu Zhang a,b, Ji-Feng Ying a, Ben-Xun Su a a State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 9825, Beijing 100029, China b State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China article info abstract Article history: Studies of mantle xenoliths have confirmed that Archean subcontinental lithospheric mantle (SCLM) is highly Received 21 August 2010 depleted in basaltic components (such as Al, Ca and Na) due to high-degree extraction of mafic and ultramafic Accepted 24 January 2013 melts and thus is refractory and buoyant, which made it chronically stable as tectonically independent units. Available online 4 February 2013 However, increasing studies show that ancient SCLM can be refertilized by episodic rejuvenation events like infiltration of upwelling fertile material. The North China Craton is one of the most typical cases for relatively Keywords: complete destruction of its Archean keel since the eruption of Paleozoic kimberlites, as is evidenced by a dra- Archean craton fl Circum-craton matic change in the compositions of mantle xenoliths sampled by Paleozoic to Cenozoic magmas, re ecting Subcontinental lithospheric mantle significant
    [Show full text]
  • D.5.1.1. Identification, Ranking and Characterization of Potential Geothermal Reservoirs
    D.5.1.1. Identification, ranking and characterization of potential geothermal reservoirs March 2018 D.5.4.1. Identification, ranking and characterization of potential geothermal reservoirs Authors: Ágnes Rotár-Szalkai (MBFSZ), Gyula Maros (MBFSZ), László Bereczki (MBFSZ), Gábor Markos (MBFSZ) Edit Babinszki (MBFSZ), László Zilahi-Sebess (MBFSZ), Ágnes Gulyás (MBFSZ), Éva Kun (MBFSZ), Teodóra Szőcs(MBFSZ), Tamás Kerékgyártó (MBFSZ), Annamária Nádor (MBFSZ), László Ádám (MANNVIT), Nina Rman (GeoZS), Dušan Rajver (GeoZS), Andrej Lapanje (GeoZS), Dejan Šram (GeoZS), Tamara Marković (HGI-CGS), Ana Vranješ (FMG), Radu Fărnoaga (IGR), (IGR), Albert Baltres (IGR), Ioan Cociuba (IGR), Ștefan Olah (Teratechnik), Natalija Samardžić (FZZG), Hazim Hrvatović (FZZG), Ferid Skopljak (FZZG),Boban Jolović (GSRS) with contributions from MBFSZ, Mannvit, InnoGeo, GeoZS, LEAP, HGI-CGS, ZARA, IGR, Terratechnik, FMG, FZZG, GSRS DARLINGe project is co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (1612249,99 €) and by the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance II (534646,6 €) under Grant Agreement no DTP1-099-3.2 Content 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Methods for the identification of geothermal reservoirs ............................................................... 1 3. Geographical setting of the project area ........................................................................................ 2 4. Geological conditions .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]