DOCSLIB.ORG

Workshop Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Workshop Report STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP ON THE MANAGEMENT OF THE LIVE REEF FOOD FISH TRADE IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA Workshop Report Lamana Hotel, Port Moresby, 7-9 July, 2009 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by the National Fisheries Authority and The Nature Conservancy with funding from the Coral Triangle Support Partnership (CTSP). NATIONAL FISHERIES AUTHORITY REPORT OF THE NATIONAL FISHERIES AUTHORITY STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP ON THE MANAGEMENT OF THE LIVE REEF FOOD FISH TRADE IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA, PORT MORESBY, 7-9 JULY, 2009. National Fisheries Authority of Papua New Guinea The Nature Conservancy Coral Triangle Support Partnership PNG LRFFT Stakeholder Management Workshop Report 3 Report of the National Fisheries Authority Stakeholder Workshop on the Management of the Live Reef Food Fish Trade in Papua New Guinea. Port Moresby, 7-9 July, 2009 National Fisheries Authority of Papua New Guinea The Nature Conservancy USAID Project Number: GCP LWA Award # LAG-A-00-99-00048-00 Citation: NFA & TNC (2009) Report of the National Fisheries Authority Stakeholder Workshop on the Management of the Live Reef Food Fish Trade in Papua New Guinea. Pt. Moresby, 7-9 July, 2009. National Fisheries Authority and The Nature Conservancy, Pt. Moresby, PNG. 76 pp Edited by: Dr Andrew Smith, Director, Coastal Fisheries Management Program (Asia-Pacific), The Nature Conservancy, PO Box 5681, West End, QLD 4101, Australia. Tel: +61 7 3214 6912; Email: [email protected] Mr. Leban Gisawa, Manager - Inshore Fisheries, National Fisheries Authority, PO Box 2016, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea. Tel: +675 309 0444; Email: [email protected] Printed in: Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea, 2009 More information on the six-nation Coral Triangle Initiative and support by USAID can be found at: www.cti-secretariat.net www.uscti.org www.usctsp.org Funding for the preparation of this document was provided by the USAID-funded Coral Triangle Support Partnership (CTSP) to The Nature Conservancy. CTSP is a consortium led by the World Wildlife Fund, The Nature Conservancy and Conservation International. © 2011 Coral Triangle Support Partnership. All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this report for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such permission should be addressed to: Maurice Knight Chief of Party, US Coral Triangle Support Partnership (CTSP) One Wolter Place - Mezzanine Fl. Jl. Wolter Monginsidi No.63B Kebayoran Baru, Jakarta 12180, Indonesia Indonesia Phone: +62-81-116-0837/Fax: +62-21-576-1080 US Phone: 202-468-4502/Fax: 202-293-9211 [email protected] Disclaimer: This document is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of Coral Triangle Support Partnership (CTSP), the National Fisheries Authority (PNG) and The Nature Conservancy, and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. 4 PNG LRFFT Stakeholder Management Workshop Report CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................................ ii Acronyms and Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................................................... iv 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Workshop Purpose and Objectives ............................................................................................................................................ 3 2.1. Purpose ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.2. Objectives ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 2.3. Outputs ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.4. Process and Agenda ................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3. Workshop Report .................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 3.1. Opening ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 3.2. Expectations ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 3.3. Background Presentations ....................................................................................................................................................................... 8 3.4. Discussion of Current Management Plan Objective ............................................................................................................. 21 3.5. Issue Identification, Risk Assessment and Management Actions ..................................................................................... 22 3.6. Management Plan Review .................................................................................................................................................................... 28 3.7. Recommendations ................................................................................................................................................................................... 29 3.8. Next Steps ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30 3.9. Evaluation ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 31 3.10. Closing ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 31 Appendix A USCTI Results Framework ........................................................................................................................................ 32 Appendix B Workshop List of Participants ................................................................................................................................. 33 Appendix C Workshop Agenda ......................................................................................................................................................... 37 Appendix D Review of the Live Reef Food Fish Fishery operation and its management in Papua New Guinea .................................................................................................................................................................................... 39 Appendix E Possible Issues to Consider Under EAF Component Tree ................................................................... 51 Appendix F Working Group Results: Issues, Risk Assessments and Management Actions .......................... 52 Appendix G Review of The National Live Reef Food Fish Fishery Management Plan – Annotations and Notes...................................................................................................................................................................................... 57 Appendix H Workshop Evaluation Summary ............................................................................................................................ 64 PNG LRFFT Stakeholder Management Workshop Report 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was funded under the USAID-supported Coral Triangle Support Partnership (CTSP). As part of the US Coral Triangle Initiative Support Program, CTSP is part of the United States Government’s commitment to promote the sustainable management of the marine and coastal resources in the Coral Triangle. In cooperation with the national governments of the Coral Triangle and the international community, this five-year program provides technical assistance and builds capacity to address critical issues including
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Civil Aviation Development Investment Program (Tranche 3)
    Resettlement Due Diligence Reports Project Number: 43141-044 June 2016 PNG: Multitranche Financing Facility - Civil Aviation Development Investment Program (Tranche 3) Prepared by National Airports Corporation for the Asian Development Bank. This resettlement due diligence report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Table of Contents B. Resettlement Due Diligence Report 1. Madang Airport Due Diligence Report 2. Mendi Airport Due Diligence Report 3. Momote Airport Due Diligence Report 4. Mt. Hagen Due Diligence Report 5. Vanimo Airport Due Diligence Report 6. Wewak Airport Due Diligence Report 4. Madang Airport Due Diligence Report. I. OUTLINE FOR MADANG AIRPORT DUE DILIGENCE REPORT 1. The is a Due Diligent Report (DDR) that reviews the Pavement Strengthening Upgrading, & Associated Works proposed for the Madang Airport in Madang Province (MP). It presents social safeguard aspects/social impacts assessment of the proposed works and mitigation measures. II. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 2. Madang Airport is situated at 5° 12 30 S, 145° 47 0 E in Madang and is about 5km from Madang Town, Provincial Headquarters of Madang Province where banks, post office, business houses, hotels and guest houses are located.
    [Show full text]
  • Papua New Guinea
    PAPUA NEW GUINEA EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS OPERATIONAL LOGISTICS CONTINGENCY PLAN PART 2 –EXISTING RESPONSE CAPACITY & OVERVIEW OF LOGISTICS SITUATION GLOBAL LOGISTICS CLUSTER – WFP FEBRUARY – MARCH 2011 1 | P a g e A. Summary A. SUMMARY 2 B. EXISTING RESPONSE CAPACITIES 4 C. LOGISTICS ACTORS 6 A. THE LOGISTICS COORDINATION GROUP 6 B. PAPUA NEW GUINEAN ACTORS 6 AT NATIONAL LEVEL 6 AT PROVINCIAL LEVEL 9 C. INTERNATIONAL COORDINATION BODIES 10 DMT 10 THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL 10 D. OVERVIEW OF LOGISTICS INFRASTRUCTURE, SERVICES & STOCKS 11 A. LOGISTICS INFRASTRUCTURES OF PNG 11 PORTS 11 AIRPORTS 14 ROADS 15 WATERWAYS 17 STORAGE 18 MILLING CAPACITIES 19 B. LOGISTICS SERVICES OF PNG 20 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 20 FUEL SUPPLY 20 TRANSPORTERS 21 HEAVY HANDLING AND POWER EQUIPMENT 21 POWER SUPPLY 21 TELECOMS 22 LOCAL SUPPLIES MARKETS 22 C. CUSTOMS CLEARANCE 23 IMPORT CLEARANCE PROCEDURES 23 TAX EXEMPTION PROCESS 24 THE IMPORTING PROCESS FOR EXEMPTIONS 25 D. REGULATORY DEPARTMENTS 26 CASA 26 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 26 NATIONAL INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AUTHORITY (NICTA) 27 2 | P a g e MARITIME AUTHORITIES 28 1. NATIONAL MARITIME SAFETY AUTHORITY 28 2. TECHNICAL DEPARTMENTS DEPENDING FROM THE NATIONAL PORT CORPORATION LTD 30 E. PNG GLOBAL LOGISTICS CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS 34 A. CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS PROPOSED 34 MAJOR PROBLEMS/BOTTLENECKS IDENTIFIED: 34 SOLUTIONS PROPOSED 34 B. EXISTING OPERATIONAL CORRIDORS IN PNG 35 MAIN ENTRY POINTS: 35 SECONDARY ENTRY POINTS: 35 EXISTING CORRIDORS: 36 LOGISTICS HUBS: 39 C. STORAGE: 41 CURRENT SITUATION: 41 PROPOSED LONG TERM SOLUTION 41 DURING EMERGENCIES 41 D. DELIVERIES: 41 3 | P a g e B. Existing response capacities Here under is an updated list of the main response capacities currently present in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Health&Medicalinfoupdate8/10/2017 Page 1 HEALTH and MEDICAL
    HEALTH AND MEDICAL INFORMATION The American Embassy assumes no responsibility for the professional ability or integrity of the persons, centers, or hospitals appearing on this list. The names of doctors are listed in alphabetical, specialty and regional order. The order in which this information appears has no other significance. Routine care is generally available from general practitioners or family practice professionals. Care from specialists is by referral only, which means you first visit the general practitioner before seeing the specialist. Most specialists have private offices (called “surgeries” or “clinic”), as well as consulting and treatment rooms located in Medical Centers attached to the main teaching hospitals. Residential areas are served by a large number of general practitioners who can take care of most general illnesses The U.S Government assumes no responsibility for payment of medical expenses for private individuals. The Social Security Medicare Program does not provide coverage for hospital or medical outside the U.S.A. For further information please see our information sheet entitled “Medical Information for American Traveling Abroad.” IMPORTANT EMERGENCY NUMBERS AMBULANCE/EMERGENCY SERVICES (National Capital District only) Police: 112 / (675) 324-4200 Fire: 110 St John Ambulance: 111 Life-line: 326-0011 / 326-1680 Mental Health Services: 301-3694 HIV/AIDS info: 323-6161 MEDEVAC Niugini Air Rescue Tel (675) 323-2033 Fax (675) 323-5244 Airport (675) 323-4700; A/H Mobile (675) 683-0305 Toll free: 0561293722468 - 24hrs Medevac Pacific Services: Tel (675) 323-5626; 325-6633 Mobile (675) 683-8767 PNG Wide Toll free: 1801 911 / 76835227 – 24hrs Health&MedicalInfoupdate8/10/2017 Page 1 AMR Air Ambulance 8001 South InterPort Blvd Ste.
    [Show full text]
  • Resilience Sourcebook
    RESILIENCE SOURCEBOOK INSPIRED BY THE 2013 MILSTEIN SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL AND ECOLOGICAL RESILIENCE IN ISLAND SYSTEMS INFORMING POLICY AND SHARING LESSONS FOR MANAGEMENT CASE STUDIES OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL RESILIENCE IN ISLAND SYSTEMS Center for Biodiversity and Conservation CASE STUDIES OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL RESILIENCE IN ISLAND SYSTEMS LEARNING THROUGH DOING: THE STORY OF AILAN AWARENESS’S PARTNERSHIPS WITH COASTAL COMMUNITIES NEW IRELAND PROVINCE, PAPUA NEW GUINEA John Aini1 Paige West1,2 Founded in 1993, Ailan Awareness is a small Papua New Guinean nongovernmental organization that specializes in community-based marine conservation. Below are stories from two of the communities where it has been working. Lovangai, the setting for the first case, is the community from which Ailan Awareness emerged. The founders of Ailan Awareness – John Aini, Bernard Miller Aini, and Michael Ladi – are all from Lovangai Map Data: and established Ailan Awareness in response ©2013 Google to their observations of declining fisheries stocks in their home waters. New Ireland Province The progression of the work in Lovangai Lovangai illustrates the lessons learned for Ailan Simbo Belifu Awareness during the organization’s beginning years: how it came to its unique approach to marine conservation. The second story, about Pananaru, shows the potential of this approach. EVOLVING APPROACHES TO MARINE RESOUrcE MANAGEMENT THE DISTURBANCE ENHANCE RESILIENCE IN LOVANGAI, NEW IRELAND, PAPUA In 1982-83, when Aini was studying fisheries NEW GUINEA science in Kavieng, he would periodically come home to Lovangai and saw that fisheries near THE SETTING Lovangai were degraded – reefs were fished out; Lovangai is located on New Hanover Island, at 2° people had to travel very far in order to catch 38’41”S, 150°17’59”E, a 2.5-hour boat ride from anything of value, and traditional conservation Kaveing, the capital of New Ireland Province.
    [Show full text]
  • PNG: Building Resilience to Climate Change in Papua New Guinea
    Environmental Assessment and Review Framework September 2015 PNG: Building Resilience to Climate Change in Papua New Guinea This environmental assessment and review framework is a document of the borrower/recipient. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Project information, including draft and final documents, will be made available for public review and comment as per ADB Public Communications Policy 2011. The environmental assessment and review framework will be uploaded to ADB website and will be disclosed locally. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................... ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. ii 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 A. BACKGROUND .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RAPID ASSESSMENT of AVOIDABLE BLINDNESS and DIABETIC RETINOPATHY REPORT Papua New Guinea 2017
    RAPID ASSESSMENT OF AVOIDABLE BLINDNESS AND DIABETIC RETINOPATHY REPORT Papua New Guinea 2017 RAPID ASSESSMENT OF AVOIDABLE BLINDNESS AND DIABETIC RETINOPATHY PAPUA NEW GUINEA, 2017 1 Acknowledgements The Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB) + Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) was a Brien Holden Vision Institute (the Institute) project, conducted in cooperation with the Institute’s partner in Papua New Guinea (PNG) – PNG Eye Care. We would like to sincerely thank the Fred Hollows Foundation, Australia for providing project funding, PNG Eye Care for managing the field work logistics, Fred Hollows New Zealand for providing expertise to the steering committee, Dr Hans Limburg and Dr Ana Cama for providing the RAAB training. We also wish to acknowledge the National Prevention of Blindness Committee in PNG and the following individuals for their tremendous contributions: Dr Jambi Garap – President of National Prevention of Blindness Committee PNG, Board President of PNG Eye Care Dr Simon Melengas – Chief Ophthalmologist PNG Dr Geoffrey Wabulembo - Paediatric ophthalmologist, University of PNG and CBM Mr Samuel Koim – General Manager, PNG Eye Care Dr Georgia Guldan – Professor of Public Health, Acting Head of Division of Public Health, School of Medical and Health Services, University of PNG Dr Apisai Kerek – Ophthalmologist, Port Moresby General Hospital Dr Robert Ko – Ophthalmologist, Port Moresby General Hospital Dr David Pahau – Ophthalmologist, Boram General Hospital Dr Waimbe Wahamu – Ophthalmologist, Mt Hagen Hospital Ms Theresa Gende
    [Show full text]
  • PAPUA NEW GUINEA and SOLOMON ISLANDS - 6HYHUH6HD6ZHOO)ORRGV $IIHFWHG$UHDV5HSRUWHGDVRI'HFHPEHUY
    PAPUA NEW GUINEA and SOLOMON ISLANDS - 6HYHUH6HD6ZHOO)ORRGV $IIHFWHG$UHDV5HSRUWHGDVRI'HFHPEHUY Legend 7LGHVKDYHDIIHFWHGQXPHURXVLVODQGV RIIWKHQRUWKFRDVWRI0DQXVLQFOXGLQJ $IIHFWHGORFDWLRQ 3RQDP3LW\OXK$ KXV$QGUDDQG%LSL 1DWLRQDOFDSLWDO 0DMRUWRZQ 7KHFRDVWOLQHEHWZHQ )ORRGLQJGDPDJHDURXQG 0RVWKHDYLO\DIIHFWHG .DYLHQJDQG1DPDWDQDL $IIHFWHG :HZDNWRZQDORQJWKH LQ1HZ,UHODQG3URYLQFH EmirauTench ,QWHUQDWLRQDOERXQGDU\ (DVW6HSLNFRDVWDQG0XULN PonamPityluh 3URYLQFHERXQGDU\ ,VODQGVLQWKH6HSLNULYHU $WROOFRPPXQLWLHVLQFOXGLQJ Kavieng 0$186 7DVPDQ0RUWORFN1XJXULD 7KLVPDSVKRZVUHJLRQV Konos DQGWKH&DUWHUHWV DQGVSHFLILFORFDWLRQV Kimadan DIIHFWHGE\VHYHUHVHD :(67 Wewak P D U 1(:,5(/$1' L V F N Namatanai VZHOOVLQ3DSXD1HZ 6(3,. % 6 H D Tasman *XLQHDDQGWKH6RORPRQ ($67 ,VODQGVDVRI'HFHPEHU 6(3,. ($671(: Mortlock %5,7$,1 Nuguria 0$'$1* Madang Pelau %XNDFRDVW 3OHDVHUHIHUWRWKHODWHVW (1*$ :(67(51 :(671(: +,*+/$1'6 2&+$6LW5HSIRUPRUH %5,7$,1 Luaniua GHWDLOHGLQIRUPDWLRQRQ 0252%( $8721202865(*,21 6287+(51 &+,0%8 2)%28*$,19,//( +,*+/$1'6 ($67(51 +,*+/$1'6 Lae SOLOMON Map Doc Name: 6 R 2&+$B31*B.LQJB)ORRGVBYB O R P R GLIDE Number: )/ *8/) Q 6 H D ISLANDS Creation Date: 'HF PAPUA NEW GUINEA Projection/Datum: *HRJUDSKLF:*6 :(67(51 Web Resources: KWWSRFKDRQOLQHXQRUJURDS Nominal Scale at A4 paper size: Popondetta 3HODXDQG/XDQLXDRQ2QWRQJ NPV -DYDDWROOLQWKH6RORPRQ,VODQGV &(175$/ Map data source(s): *$8/31*1DWLRQDO6WDWLVWLFDO2IILFH 162 *(%&2 252 0LOQH%D\ 8QLWHG1DWLRQV&DUWRJUDSKLF8QLW Port Moresby Disclaimers: 0,/1(%$< Honiara 7KH GHVLJQDWLRQV HPSOR\HG DQG WKH SUHVHQWDWLRQ RI PDWHULDORQWKLVPDSGRQRWLPSO\WKHH[SUHVVLRQRIDQ\
    [Show full text]
  • Key Findings and Recommendations
    UNHCR FACT SHEET ON SITUATION OF REFUGEES AND ASYLUM-SEEKERS ON MANUS ISLAND, PAPUA NEW GUINEA 15 December 2017 Key Findings and Recommendations Operational Context 3,172 refugees and asylum-seekers have been forcibly transferred by Australia to ‘offshore processing’ facilities in Papua New Guinea and Nauru since the introduction of the current policy in 2013.1 Of these, some 800 remain in Papua New Guinea. Following the Australia-United States relocation arrangement, UNHCR has referred more than 1,200 refugees to the United States of America since December 2016. Another 500 people still require a review of their refugee status determination process by authorities in Papua New Guinea and Nauru, under the Australian arrangement. Long-term solutions remain needed for all people transferred by Australia to Papua New Guinea and Nauru. Neither Papua New Guinea nor Nauru are appropriate places for local integration for the majority of refugees and asylum-seekers, particularly given their acute needs as a result of prolonged detention and harsh conditions. PROTECTION Key Findings ■ Physical security remains a serious concern at Ward 1 of Lorengau, Manus Island, where both West Lorengau Haus and Hillside Haus are located. On the night of Saturday 9 to Sunday 10 December 2017, three separate incidents occurred in which aggrieved local residents approached these facilities and threatened refugees and asylum-seekers. This follows previous similar incidents on 17 November 2017 and 7 December 2017. 1 Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Parliament of Australia, Additional Estimates Hearing, AE17/170, 27 February 2017. www.unhcr.org 1 ■ The findings below are derived from consistent reports by refugees and asylum-seekers, local community members, locally contracted security staff and local police authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern and Milne Bay Mission, South Pacific Division
    Northern and Milne Bay Mission headquarters, Papua New Guinea. Photo courtesy of Barry Oliver. Northern and Milne Bay Mission, South Pacific Division BARRY OLIVER Barry Oliver, Ph.D., retired in 2015 as president of the South Pacific Division of Seventh-day Adventists, Sydney, Australia. An Australian by birth Oliver has served the Church as a pastor, evangelist, college teacher, and administrator. In retirement, he is a conjoint associate professor at Avondale College of Higher Education. He has authored over 106 significant publications and 192 magazine articles. He is married to Julie with three adult sons and three grandchildren. The Northern and Milne Bay Mission (N&MBM) is the Seventh-day Adventist Church administrative entity for the Northern and Milne Bay areas of Papua New Guinea.1 The Territory and Statistics of the Northern and Milne Bay Mission The territory of the N&MBM is the “Milne Bay and Northern Provinces of Papua New Guinea.”2 It is a part of and responsible to the Papua New Guinea Union Mission, Lae, Morobe Province, Papua New Guinea. The Papua New Guinea Union Mission comprises the Seventh-day Adventist Church entities in the country of Papua New Guinea. There are nine local missions and one local conference in the union. They are the Central Papuan Conference, the Bougainville Mission, the New Britain New Ireland Mission, the Northern and Milne Bay Mission, Morobe Mission, Madang Manus Mission, Sepik Mission, Eastern Highlands Simbu Mission, Western Highlands Mission and South West Papuan Mission. The administrative office of N&MBM is located at Killerton Road, Popondetta 241, Papua New Guinea.
    [Show full text]
  • MARSH Project Final Report, Including Response to Audit
    MANGROVE REHABILITATION FOR SUSTAINABLY- MANAGED HEALTHY FORESTS (MARSH) FINAL REPORT REPORTING ON WORK BETWEEN OCTOBER 1, 2012 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 SUBMITTED January 18, 2016 Cover photo: A mangrove nursery in the Central Province established by the MARSH project Photo: © MARSH PMU Mangrove Rehabilitation for Sustainably-Managed Healthy Forests Final Report Prepared for Cooperative Agreement to a Public International Organization No. AID- 492-A-12-00010, USAID, Philippines Submitted to: Randy John Vinluan, Agreement Officer’s Representative, USAID/Pacific Islands By: IUCN Regional Office for Oceania, International Union for the Conservation of Nature Submitted on: January 18th, 2016 Contacts: Mr. Taholo Kami Dr. Milika Sobey IUCN Oceania Regional Office IUCN Oceania Regional Office IUCN (International Union for IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Conservation of Nature) Private Mail Bag 5 Ma’afu Street, Private Mail Bag 5 Ma’afu Street, Suva, Fiji Islands Suva, Fiji Islands tel. +679 3319 084 tel. +679 3100 392 fax. +679 3100 128 fax. +679 3100 128 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] 2 Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 6 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 General
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Biodiversity Survey of Papua New Guinea’S Manus and Mussau Islands
    A Rapid Biodiversity Survey of Papua New Guinea’s Manus and Mussau Islands edited by Nathan Whitmore Published by: Wildlife Conservation Society Papua New Guinea Program PO BOX 277, Goroka, Eastern Highlands Province PAPUA NEW GUINEA Tel: +675-532-3494 www.wcs.org Editor: Nathan Whitmore. Authors: Ken P. Aplin, Arison Arihafa, Kyle N. Armstrong, Richard Cuthbert, Chris J. Müller, Junior Novera, Stephen J. Richards, William Tamarua, Günther Theischinger, Fanie Venter, and Nathan Whitmore. The Wildlife Conservation Society is a private, not-for-profit organisation exempt from federal income tax under section 501c(3) of the Inland Revenue Code. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Wildlife Conservation Society, the Criticial Ecosystems Partnership Fund, nor the Papua New Guinean Department of Environment or Conservation. Suggested citation: Whitmore N. (editor) 2015. A rapid biodiversity survey of Papua New Guinea’s Manus and Mussau Islands. Wildlife Conservation Society Papua New Guinea Program. Goroka, PNG. ISBN: 978-0-9943203-1-5 Front cover Image: Fanie Venter: cliffs of Mussau. ©2015 Wildlife Conservation Society A rapid biodiversity survey of Papua New Guinea’s Manus and Mussau Islands. Edited by Nathan Whitmore Table of Contents Participants i Acknowledgements iii Organisational profiles iv Letter of support v Foreword vi Executive summary vii Introduction 1 Chapters 1: Plants of Mussau Island 4 2: Butterflies of Mussau Island (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera)
    [Show full text]
  • Failure Analysis and Design Improvement Proposal for Flood- Damaged Bridges in Papua New Guinea
    Failure Analysis and Design Improvement Proposal for Flood- damaged Bridges in Papua New Guinea Gibson Ali HOLEMBA Candidate for the Degree of Master of Engineering Supervisor: Professor Takashi MATSUMOTO Division of Engineering and Policy for Sustainable Environment Introduction people as a by-product of the water cycle process. The only way out to reduce or control and provide a The climatic effect of flood against the road infrastructure sustainable solution is an innovative way of engineering such as a bridge is so prevalent that it requires deeper and technology and better flood mitigation planning and engineering and technological intervention to address this control works. Fig. 1 shows 5.0m of road approach and ever-present phenomenon. Papua New Guinea has been bridge abutment of Pine Tops Bridge damaged by the experiencing frequent bridge failures and collapses due to flood in April of 2017. flooding rivers in the recent past. According to the internal records from Papua New Guinea Department of Works, it has shown that over Two Hundred and Eighty (285) bridges, fords (causeways) and major culverts were damaged by flood action alone in the last Five years. That is at a rate of 57 bridges in a year and this result is very staggering. Bridge damages have been observed to be mainly at the bridge foundations. More specifically, the flooding waters erode the bridge abutments, scour the bridge piers and weaken the bridge’s resistance against the flood loads and eventually destroy the bridge. In addition, it is also Figure 1. Flood-damaged Pine Tops Bridge, Wau attested that riverbank and road approach embankment Highway, Morobe Province, Papua New Guinea.
    [Show full text]