DOCSLIB.ORG

Migration Amendment (Repairing Medical Transfers) Bill 2019 by Dr Tanya Mcintyre, 15 August 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Migration Amendment (Repairing Medical Transfers) Bill 2019 by Dr Tanya Mcintyre, 15 August 2019 Submission to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee inquiry into the Migration Amendment (Repairing Medical Transfers) Bill 2019 by Dr Tanya McIntyre, 15 August 2019 Submission overview and concerns This submission outlines my views on refugees and asylum seekers 1 in need of medical evacuation from Papua New Guinea and Nauru to Australia, as enabled by the Home Affairs Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures) Act 2019 , referred to herein as the “medevac law”. I am concerned that people who are physically and mentally unwell are denied medical treatment. I am appalled that this is done to uphold government policy that is explicit in its aim to inflict ongoing harm on one group of people to try to compel them to return to the harm they fled as refugees, and to warn others of the harm they would also suffer if they try to seek refuge in Australia. I am concerned about this brutal and inhumane treatment of refugees. It does not befit the fair, democratic and compassionate principles that we like to think underpin Australian society and polity. My experience with refugees in Australia’s offshore detention regime In 2012 I began visiting refugees in Australian immigration detention. In 2014 I completed a Graduate Certificate in Australian Migration Law and Practice. My other credentials include a PhD in Asian studies. Since 2014 I have met and communicated with refugees detained by Australia on Nauru and Manus Island after 19 July 2013 when offshore detention became more than a temporary processing regime and became a feature of the practice of permanent exile of people who sought protection in Australia. In 2015 I registered as a migration agent and began providing migration assistance to refugees in Australia’s immigration detention network. Since 2015, I have been a member of Darwin Asylum Seeker Support and Advocacy Network (DASSAN) through which I assisted sending e-books to refugees on Manus Island and Nauru and distributing a hardship fund to refugees, including in Papua New Guinea. In 2017 I lived in Wewak in Papua New Guinea for several months. I worked for a local non- government organisation to establish monitoring and evaluation systems for a project that supports market vendors, who were mainly women, to elevate the status of their work into the formal economy as a regulated and safe working environment. 1 The terms ‘refugee’ and ‘asylum seeker’ generally refer to, respectively, people found to be refugees through a refugee determination process and people seeking asylum but not found to be refugees either through a refugee determination process or not having yet undergone or completed a refugee determination process. However, in this submission, I hereon refer to both groups as refugees. This is for ease of reference and to not distract from the subject of medical needs by delving into immigration status issues. It also acknowledgement that many people in Papua New Guinea and Nauru not yet found to be refugees are still requesting their refugee claims be assessed or reviewed according to the principles of the UN Refugee Convention and the UN guidelines on determining refugee status. Submission to Senate Committee by Dr Tanya McIntyre Medevac Law Page 1 of 5 While living in Wewak in 2017, I made two trips to Manus Island, for approximately two weeks on each occasion, and met some of the refugees held there since 2013. In April-May 2019, I visited Manus Island for approximately three weeks, and Port Moresby for approximately a week. I was devastated to see everyone I had met on Manus Island in 2017 suffering further and sharp decline in their health and wellbeing. In 2017, people I met on Manus Island had descended to a level of despair and hopelessness lower than I have ever seen in the years I have interacted with refugees. Yet by 2019, the same people had crashed to unimaginably gut wrenching pits of despair and hopelessness. Whereas in 2017 people were relatively engaged and welcomed the opportunity to exchange stories and experiences, by 2019 the same people apologetically struggled to even go out of their guarded accommodation due to their incapacity to cope with life. In recent months, I have been assisting more than 20 refugees with their applications under the medevac law. This involves gathering their medical records and contextual information about factors affecting their health and wellbeing, responding to emergencies including suicide attempts, and referring to appropriate services where possible. Observations of Wewak medical services – a comparative example of regional Papua New Guinea Medical services in the regional town of Wewak may be loosely compared to that of Lorengau on Manus Island. However, Wewak is not as remote as Manus Island. Wewak is situated on the north coast of the main island of Papua New Guinea, and is larger and better-resourced than Lorengau. Wewak population is around 30,000. Lorengau population is around 7,000. Wewak medical services, although substandard, are likely better than medical services in Lorengau. Moreover, Wewak is not overwhelmed by a population of ‘foreigners’. Whereas the large number of refugees in Lorengau in recent years has placed additional demand on already substandard medical services. While living in Wewak, I visited a patient at the Wewak Hospital. I also knew two Australians who worked at Wewak Hospital – one in administration and another as a surgeon. The patient I visited at Wewak Hospital was my co-worker’s father from a nearby village. He was a fit, lean and strong man in his mid-fifties who developed diabetes undiagnosed until some of his toes fell off after rotting from a small, infected wound. Through several weeks in a ward of about 40 patients in one large room, while one of his daughters slept on the floor of the hospital by his bed and provided necessary care for him that the hospital could not provide, he underwent two amputations of his leg – the first below the knee and the second above the knee. Shortly after the second amputation he died, as the infection was not contained. The Australian administrative worker I knew at Wewak Hospital told me about the impact of funding constraints. For example, a doctor employed to deliver outreach services to the villages around Wewak was only funded for wages but not for travel or program support so the doctor could not deliver any services. Additionally, when administrative staff were not paid wages for months, they did not attend work, or attended but failed to undertake duties. The Australian surgeon I knew at Wewak Hospital told me that, despite the commendable skills and commitment of medical professionals, the hospital was extremely under-resourced of both equipment and medical expertise. For example, the hospital had no independent electricity supply, so during frequent power blackouts doctors used torches and mobile phone lights to see as they completed surgery in the dark. Further, doctors worked extremely long hours and were constantly challenged to perform procedures that stretched their competencies. Patients routinely died preventable deaths that Submission to Senate Committee by Dr Tanya McIntyre Medevac Law Page 2 of 5 in Australia would invoke full investigation yet no follow up in Wewak Hospital ever occurred. There was no scrutiny of medical or systemic failure. I also knew of a disabilities service in Wewak that did not pay its employees for months, so instead of attending work, physiotherapists and other professionals resorted to selling garden produce in local markets to make ends meet. I bought some of their produce. General observations about the health of refugees held in Papua New Guinea All the refugees I met in Papua New Guinea suffered chronic physical complaints for years, and struggled increasingly with serious mental health conditions. Their treatment was mainly ineffective medication. Doctors often say and write reports that their illnesses are caused or exacerbated by stress and anxiety, resulting from their being held in Papua Guinea indefinitely. Medications are often changed due to lack of availability and for trial – this has particularly detrimental effect on refugees taking psychotropic medications. Food quality and diet is poor, increasingly so since Australia withdrew in October 2017 from directly operating the centres. Activities have declined since Australian operational withdrawal, for example with closure of prayer spaces and gyms. Almost all refugees I met had eating and sleeping disorders due to chronic pain, gastro issues and mental health issues, and were taking pain killers and tranquilisers. Some refugees suffered complex conditions that required surgery. Some had suffered botched surgery, resulting in disability. Some suffered injuries from assaults, resulting in disability and mental ill health. At least half the refugees I met reluctantly admitted to self-harming or attempting suicide – I suspect higher actual incidence. Individual cases of refugees and medical evacuation I outline below three cases of refugees I know and have assisted in their efforts to be medically evacuated to Australia. These three cases exemplify the need for medevac law to be retained. The first case is about a refugee evacuated before introduction of the medevac law. The second case is about a refugee evacuated under the medevac law. The third case is about a refugee remaining in Port Morseby whose application under the medevac law is pending. Case 1: Refugee evacuated from Nauru prior to medevac law A refugee on Nauru who I communicated with for about a year suffers multiple serious physical and mental health conditions. He lived in a tent on Nauru for most of five years. He suffers extreme loneliness and longing for family and community that he is now forever separated from. He has serious neurological and heart conditions, and severe anxiety and depression, for which he was not treated on Nauru.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Civil Aviation Development Investment Program (Tranche 3)
    Resettlement Due Diligence Reports Project Number: 43141-044 June 2016 PNG: Multitranche Financing Facility - Civil Aviation Development Investment Program (Tranche 3) Prepared by National Airports Corporation for the Asian Development Bank. This resettlement due diligence report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Table of Contents B. Resettlement Due Diligence Report 1. Madang Airport Due Diligence Report 2. Mendi Airport Due Diligence Report 3. Momote Airport Due Diligence Report 4. Mt. Hagen Due Diligence Report 5. Vanimo Airport Due Diligence Report 6. Wewak Airport Due Diligence Report 4. Madang Airport Due Diligence Report. I. OUTLINE FOR MADANG AIRPORT DUE DILIGENCE REPORT 1. The is a Due Diligent Report (DDR) that reviews the Pavement Strengthening Upgrading, & Associated Works proposed for the Madang Airport in Madang Province (MP). It presents social safeguard aspects/social impacts assessment of the proposed works and mitigation measures. II. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 2. Madang Airport is situated at 5° 12 30 S, 145° 47 0 E in Madang and is about 5km from Madang Town, Provincial Headquarters of Madang Province where banks, post office, business houses, hotels and guest houses are located.
    [Show full text]
  • Papua New Guinea
    PAPUA NEW GUINEA EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS OPERATIONAL LOGISTICS CONTINGENCY PLAN PART 2 –EXISTING RESPONSE CAPACITY & OVERVIEW OF LOGISTICS SITUATION GLOBAL LOGISTICS CLUSTER – WFP FEBRUARY – MARCH 2011 1 | P a g e A. Summary A. SUMMARY 2 B. EXISTING RESPONSE CAPACITIES 4 C. LOGISTICS ACTORS 6 A. THE LOGISTICS COORDINATION GROUP 6 B. PAPUA NEW GUINEAN ACTORS 6 AT NATIONAL LEVEL 6 AT PROVINCIAL LEVEL 9 C. INTERNATIONAL COORDINATION BODIES 10 DMT 10 THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL 10 D. OVERVIEW OF LOGISTICS INFRASTRUCTURE, SERVICES & STOCKS 11 A. LOGISTICS INFRASTRUCTURES OF PNG 11 PORTS 11 AIRPORTS 14 ROADS 15 WATERWAYS 17 STORAGE 18 MILLING CAPACITIES 19 B. LOGISTICS SERVICES OF PNG 20 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 20 FUEL SUPPLY 20 TRANSPORTERS 21 HEAVY HANDLING AND POWER EQUIPMENT 21 POWER SUPPLY 21 TELECOMS 22 LOCAL SUPPLIES MARKETS 22 C. CUSTOMS CLEARANCE 23 IMPORT CLEARANCE PROCEDURES 23 TAX EXEMPTION PROCESS 24 THE IMPORTING PROCESS FOR EXEMPTIONS 25 D. REGULATORY DEPARTMENTS 26 CASA 26 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 26 NATIONAL INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AUTHORITY (NICTA) 27 2 | P a g e MARITIME AUTHORITIES 28 1. NATIONAL MARITIME SAFETY AUTHORITY 28 2. TECHNICAL DEPARTMENTS DEPENDING FROM THE NATIONAL PORT CORPORATION LTD 30 E. PNG GLOBAL LOGISTICS CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS 34 A. CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS PROPOSED 34 MAJOR PROBLEMS/BOTTLENECKS IDENTIFIED: 34 SOLUTIONS PROPOSED 34 B. EXISTING OPERATIONAL CORRIDORS IN PNG 35 MAIN ENTRY POINTS: 35 SECONDARY ENTRY POINTS: 35 EXISTING CORRIDORS: 36 LOGISTICS HUBS: 39 C. STORAGE: 41 CURRENT SITUATION: 41 PROPOSED LONG TERM SOLUTION 41 DURING EMERGENCIES 41 D. DELIVERIES: 41 3 | P a g e B. Existing response capacities Here under is an updated list of the main response capacities currently present in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • PNG: Building Resilience to Climate Change in Papua New Guinea
    Environmental Assessment and Review Framework September 2015 PNG: Building Resilience to Climate Change in Papua New Guinea This environmental assessment and review framework is a document of the borrower/recipient. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Project information, including draft and final documents, will be made available for public review and comment as per ADB Public Communications Policy 2011. The environmental assessment and review framework will be uploaded to ADB website and will be disclosed locally. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................... ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. ii 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 A. BACKGROUND .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RAPID ASSESSMENT of AVOIDABLE BLINDNESS and DIABETIC RETINOPATHY REPORT Papua New Guinea 2017
    RAPID ASSESSMENT OF AVOIDABLE BLINDNESS AND DIABETIC RETINOPATHY REPORT Papua New Guinea 2017 RAPID ASSESSMENT OF AVOIDABLE BLINDNESS AND DIABETIC RETINOPATHY PAPUA NEW GUINEA, 2017 1 Acknowledgements The Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB) + Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) was a Brien Holden Vision Institute (the Institute) project, conducted in cooperation with the Institute’s partner in Papua New Guinea (PNG) – PNG Eye Care. We would like to sincerely thank the Fred Hollows Foundation, Australia for providing project funding, PNG Eye Care for managing the field work logistics, Fred Hollows New Zealand for providing expertise to the steering committee, Dr Hans Limburg and Dr Ana Cama for providing the RAAB training. We also wish to acknowledge the National Prevention of Blindness Committee in PNG and the following individuals for their tremendous contributions: Dr Jambi Garap – President of National Prevention of Blindness Committee PNG, Board President of PNG Eye Care Dr Simon Melengas – Chief Ophthalmologist PNG Dr Geoffrey Wabulembo - Paediatric ophthalmologist, University of PNG and CBM Mr Samuel Koim – General Manager, PNG Eye Care Dr Georgia Guldan – Professor of Public Health, Acting Head of Division of Public Health, School of Medical and Health Services, University of PNG Dr Apisai Kerek – Ophthalmologist, Port Moresby General Hospital Dr Robert Ko – Ophthalmologist, Port Moresby General Hospital Dr David Pahau – Ophthalmologist, Boram General Hospital Dr Waimbe Wahamu – Ophthalmologist, Mt Hagen Hospital Ms Theresa Gende
    [Show full text]
  • Key Findings and Recommendations
    UNHCR FACT SHEET ON SITUATION OF REFUGEES AND ASYLUM-SEEKERS ON MANUS ISLAND, PAPUA NEW GUINEA 15 December 2017 Key Findings and Recommendations Operational Context 3,172 refugees and asylum-seekers have been forcibly transferred by Australia to ‘offshore processing’ facilities in Papua New Guinea and Nauru since the introduction of the current policy in 2013.1 Of these, some 800 remain in Papua New Guinea. Following the Australia-United States relocation arrangement, UNHCR has referred more than 1,200 refugees to the United States of America since December 2016. Another 500 people still require a review of their refugee status determination process by authorities in Papua New Guinea and Nauru, under the Australian arrangement. Long-term solutions remain needed for all people transferred by Australia to Papua New Guinea and Nauru. Neither Papua New Guinea nor Nauru are appropriate places for local integration for the majority of refugees and asylum-seekers, particularly given their acute needs as a result of prolonged detention and harsh conditions. PROTECTION Key Findings ■ Physical security remains a serious concern at Ward 1 of Lorengau, Manus Island, where both West Lorengau Haus and Hillside Haus are located. On the night of Saturday 9 to Sunday 10 December 2017, three separate incidents occurred in which aggrieved local residents approached these facilities and threatened refugees and asylum-seekers. This follows previous similar incidents on 17 November 2017 and 7 December 2017. 1 Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Parliament of Australia, Additional Estimates Hearing, AE17/170, 27 February 2017. www.unhcr.org 1 ■ The findings below are derived from consistent reports by refugees and asylum-seekers, local community members, locally contracted security staff and local police authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Spawning Aggregations of Coral Reef Fish in New Ireland and Manus Provinces, Papua New Guinea: Local Knowledge Field Survey Report
    July 2004 TNC Pacific Island Countries Report No. 4/04 (Unrestricted) Spawning Aggregations of Coral Reef Fish in New Ireland and Manus Provinces, Papua New Guinea: Local Knowledge Field Survey Report Unrestricted Access Version Prepared by: Richard J. Hamilton1, Manuai Matawai2 and Tapas Potuku3 Pacific Island Countries Coastal Marine Program The Nature Conservancy Author Contact Details: 1 51 Edmondstone Street, South Brisbane, Qld, 4101, Australia. Email: [email protected] 2 PO Box 408, Lorengau, Manus Province, Papua New Guinea 3 PO Box 522, Kavieng, New Ireland Province, Papua New Guinea Citation: Hamilton, R., M. Matawai and T. Potuku. 2004. Spawning Aggregations of Coral Reef Fish in New Ireland and Manus Provinces, Papua New Guinea: Local Knowledge Field Survey Report. (UNRESTRICTED ACCESS VERSION). Report prepared for the Pacific Island Countries Coastal Marine Program, The Nature Conservancy. TNC Pacific Island Countries Report No. 4/04. © 2004 The Nature Conservancy All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior permission from the copyright holder(s). Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Acknowledgements We are extremely grateful to the numerous individuals in the communities visited in Kavieng and Manus for welcoming us, accommodating us and teaching us about reef fish spawning aggregations on their reefs. The information presented in this report is based upon their knowledge, and could not have been documented without their interest and support. In Kavieng we would like to specifically thank, Luman Lapan, Steven July Lapan, Lawrence Litau, Pomat, Ranson Aisoli, John Aini and Brenda Sainol for assisting in various ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Food and Cultural Practices of the Papua New Guinean Community In
    Food and cultural practices of the Papua New Guinean community in Australia: a community resource Food is central to the cultural and religious practices of most communities. For this reason, understanding and appreciating the food and food practices of another culture is part of building your own cultural competence. What people eat is also important to their long-term health. When people migrate to Australia, changes to the food they eat and reductions in physical activity often result in poorer health in the long term. Common health problems include nutrition-related chronic diseases like type 2 diabetes and heart disease. Lorengau MANUS Vanimo Kavieng WEST SEPIK Wewak NEW IRELAND Kokopo EAST SEPIK Papua New Guinea MADANG Madang ENGA EAST NEW BRITAIN Buka Wabag WESTERN HIGHLANDS HELA Mt. Hagen Kimbe JIWAKA Kundiawa BOUGANVILLE Tari WEST NEW BRITAIN Mendi Goroka SOUTHERN CHIMBU EASTERN Lae HIGHLANDS HIGHLANDS MOROBE GULF WESTERN Kerema Popondetta Daru CENTRAL NORTHERN PORT MORESBY NATIONAL CAPITAL DISTRICT Alotau MILNE BAY This resource provides information about the food and food practices of Papua New Guinean people settled in Queensland, Australia. It also provides general information on traditional greetings and etiquette, a general background on their country and their health profile in Australia. For readers who are involved in nutrition education, there is also a selection on culturally appropriate ways to approach this. 1. Traditional greetings and etiquette English Papua New Guinea – Tok Pisin (Melanesian Pidgin) Pronunciation Hello Halo Halo Friend/relative Wantok One-tok Good morning Mornin Mor-nin Good afternoon Apinun Api-noon Goodbye/See you later Lukim yu behain Loo-kim you be-hin For many Papua New Guinean people, it is customary to shake hands and ask, “Yu orait?” (You all right? How are you?).
    [Show full text]
  • PNG Provincial Hospital Boards' Compliance with Statutory Financial Reporting Obligations
    The University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Arts Papers and Journal Articles School of Arts 2012 PNG provincial hospital boards' compliance with statutory financial reporting obligations Mignon Shardlow University of Notre Dame Australia, [email protected] Alistair Brown Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/arts_article Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons This article was originally published as: Shardlow, M., & Brown, A. (2012). PNG provincial hospital boards' compliance with statutory financial eporr ting obligations. Legal Issues in Business, 5, 27-39. This article is posted on ResearchOnline@ND at https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/arts_article/112. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This is the author’s version of an article published as: Shardlow, M., & Brown, A. (2012). PNG provincial hospital boards' compliance with statutory financial reporting obligations. Legal Issues in Business, 5 , 27-39. PNG Provincial Hospital Boards’ Compliance With Statutory Financial Reporting Obligations Mignon Shardlow School of Arts & Sciences University of Notre Dame Australia Alistair Brown School of Accounting Curtin University of Technology; Chutian Scholar (Hubei Province) School of Accounting Zhongnan University of Economics and Law Abstract This article employs textual analysis to examine the financial statement reporting by provincial hospital boards in Papua New Guinea (‘PNG’) as they attempt to comply with mandatory financial statement reporting. Hospital boards in PNG are established under the Public Hospital Act 1994 (PNG), which requires the boards to satisfy the accounting, financial management and reporting requirements indicated under the Public Finances (Management) Act 1995 (PNG). The existing literature on hospital board reporting compliance has previously focused on developed countries with sound governance systems and developed infrastructures.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity Report 3Rd LGN Forum Activity Alotau Milne Bay
    Activity Report: Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security (CTI-CFF) 3rd Local Government Network Meeting Alotau, Papua New Guinea, March 25-27,2015 Activity Report: Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security ii (CTI-CFF) Local Government Network (LGN) Meeting Alotau, Papua New Guinea March 25-27, 2015 This publication was prepared to support the implementation of the CTI-CFF Regional and National Plans of Action. Funding for the preparation of this document was provided by the US Agency for International Development (USAID) through the US Department of Interior Mission Support Participating Agency Partnership Agreement No. AID-486-T-13-00002 DISCLAIMER The views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government For more information about this report, please contact: CTI-CFF Regional Secretariat Coral Triangle Center Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Jl. DanauTambligan No. 78 Mina Bahari Building II, 17th Foor Sanur, Bali, Indonesia 8022 Jalan Medan MerdekaTimur No. 16 Contact: RiliDjohani CFF MEWG Meeting: Review of rSCTR and M&E Indicators Jakarta Pusat 10110, Indonesia Email: [email protected] - Contact: ArwandrijaRukma www.coratrianglecenter.org Email: [email protected] www.coraltriangleinitiative.org Full Report CTI Report Full Cover photo credit: HestiWidodo/CTC ii Activity Report LGN Planning Meeting, Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia, July 7-8, 2014 CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • WANANG CONSERVATION AREA Papua New Guinea
    Empowered lives. Resilient nations. WANANG CONSERVATION AREA Papua New Guinea Equator Initiative Case Studies Local sustainable development solutions for people, nature, and resilient communities UNDP EQUATOR INITIATIVE CASE STUDY SERIES Local and indigenous communities across the world are 126 countries, the winners were recognized for their advancing innovative sustainable development solutions achievements at a prize ceremony held in conjunction that work for people and for nature. Few publications with the United Nations Convention on Climate Change or case studies tell the full story of how such initiatives (COP21) in Paris. Special emphasis was placed on the evolve, the breadth of their impacts, or how they change protection, restoration, and sustainable management over time. Fewer still have undertaken to tell these stories of forests; securing and protecting rights to communal with community practitioners themselves guiding the lands, territories, and natural resources; community- narrative. The Equator Initiative aims to fill that gap. based adaptation to climate change; and activism for The Equator Initiative, supported by generous funding environmental justice. The following case study is one in from the Government of Norway, awarded the Equator a growing series that describes vetted and peer-reviewed Prize 2015 to 21 outstanding local community and best practices intended to inspire the policy dialogue indigenous peoples initiatives to reduce poverty, protect needed to take local success to scale, to improve the global nature, and strengthen resilience in the face of climate knowledge base on local environment and development change. Selected from 1,461 nominations from across solutions, and to serve as models for replication. PROJECT SUMMARY KEY FACTS Wanang Conservation Area is an alliance of ten Equator Prize Winner indigenous, rainforest-dwelling clans that together 2015 protect 10,000 hectares of forest for biodiversity research, carbon storage, and sustainable livelihoods.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Findings and Recommendations
    UNHCR FACT SHEET ON SITUATION OF REFUGEES AND ASYLUM-SEEKERS ON MANUS ISLAND, PAPUA NEW GUINEA 21 January 2018 Key Findings and Recommendations Operational Context 3,172 refugees and asylum-seekers have been forcibly transferred by Australia to ‘offshore processing’ facilities in Papua New Guinea and Nauru since the introduction of the current policy in 2013.1 Of these, some 800 remain in Papua New Guinea. Following the Australia-United States relocation arrangement, UNHCR has endorsed the referral of more than 1,200 refugees to the United States of America since December 2016. Another 500 people still require a review of their refugee status determination process by authorities in Papua New Guinea and Nauru, under the Australian arrangement. Long-term solutions remain needed for all people transferred by Australia to Papua New Guinea and Nauru. Neither Papua New Guinea nor Nauru are appropriate places for local integration for the majority of refugees and asylum-seekers, particularly given their acute needs as a result of prolonged detention and harsh conditions. UNHCR’s last monitoring mission to Manus Island took place from 9 to 13 January 2018. This visit followed UNHCR’s continued monitoring presence on Manus Island from 28 October to 13 December 2017. PROTECTION Key Findings ■ Physical security remains a concern at Ward 1 of Lorengau, Manus Island, where both West Lorengau Haus and Hillside Haus are located. Despite a continuing increase in community tensions, and three separate security incidents in December 2017,2 current fencing is inadequate to prevent unauthorized individuals from entering the respective sites by breaching the perimeter.
    [Show full text]
  • Papua New Guinea Highlights Surveillance and Points of Entry
    Papua New Guinea Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Health Situation Report #24 07 June 2020 This Situation Report is jointly issued by PNG National Department of Health and World Health Organization once weekly. This Report is not comprehensive and covers information received as of reporting date. Highlights Papua New Guinea has eight cases of COVID-19, to date: six cases were mild and have fully recovered; two were moderate cases, admitted to hospital and recovered, one of which was repatriated. It’s been 44 days since the last case has been reported, despite ongoing sample collection and testing. With the National Parliament’s 80-2 decision, the State of Emergency (SOE) is extended for two weeks (up to 16 June). The purpose of the extension is to draft and pass Public Health Emergency Act of 2020. The proposed act is aimed at providing a legal framework to prepare for, detect and rapidly respond to COVID-19 and other public health threats with the whole-of- Government approach. With the recognition of global risk for COVD-19, the Prime Minister acknowledged the importance of continuing working with the provinces to prepare for and respond to COVID-19 while considering a transition strategy for ‘new normal’ in the country. Following the SOE extension, the Emergency Controller revoked previous SOE orders and issued 13 new orders related to public health and social measures and for strengthening the efforts for COVID-19 response and mitigating the social and economic impact to the people of PNG (See Annex A). The extended SOE will also allow time to transition to Niupela Pasin (New Normal).
    [Show full text]