Philanthropy Magazine Spring 2020: Taking America's

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Philanthropy Magazine Spring 2020: Taking America's Reprinted with the permission of Philanthropy benefactions Mini-Mouse vs. Megalodon By Karl Zinsmeister his issue of Philanthropy could pull into one of the facilities and representing large investments of labor, T magazine is an extended grab a few moments to look around and expenditure, and effort. look at little versus big, at take photos until we got kicked out. The And in the Balkans, China’s aid versus arm-twisting, at inspiration man at the wheel, a former Special Forces interventions are unfolding cheek- versus intimidation. It asks whether lots soldier, was instantly game, and steered by-jowl with major manipulations by of helpful little mice can fend off huge our SUV off the highway and down a the Russians. Russia runs extensive scary sharks. And it does all this within gravel road to one of the Chinese camps. propaganda, intelligence, and military an unusual philanthropic niche—charities I jumped out and strode quickly operations in the region. Russians have that support foreign-policy and national- down a tidy row of spartan offices marked captured control of the major energy defense goals. “Payroll,” “Engineering,” “Contracts,” companies in Serbia. In the southern Begin by examining the photograph and such. I reached a sign marking the part of that country they recently on the opposite page. I shot it a “Commissary,” and then a series of large built a large secure facility labeled couple months ago in the heart of the buildings labeled “Dorm 1, 2, 3, 4” and so in one-foot letters, “Russian-Serbian Caucasus—a strategic crossroads ringed forth. This is a major operation. Hortatory Humanitarian Center.” Experts, by Russia, Ukraine, Turkey, Iran, Iraq, placards in Chinese and broken English however, say that the windowless gray and other hot-button nations. As this urge that “Proper behavior lead a better building next to an airport is a lightly picture was taken, there were separatist future,” and trumpet “The Belt and Road: disguised intelligence and military boundary lines, gun trucks, propaganda Building Prosperity Together.” base. When I try to visit, a soldier tells broadcasters, foreign-funded madrassahs, Very soon, large unsmiling Chinese me I cannot enter or take pictures. ethnic extremists, and armed forces of men appeared and told us we could not In Iraq, where I also traveled on this all stripes looming over the horizon. take photos and must leave immediately. trip, the Chinese very recently clinched What you are looking at is one of the The Special Warfare and PsyOps a 20-year oil-for-infrastructure deal that hundreds of work camps organized and backgrounds of my two ex-military will send more than 100,000 barrels of paid for by China through its so-called colleagues immediately kicked in. They petroleum to China every day. Beijing gets “Belt and Road Initiative”—a vast play for explained in a mix of languages and the simultaneous right to build factories, influence across the low-income world. In pantomime that we needed to get off the railways, and other facilities in Iraq that scores of frail countries, the Chinese are highway because the human bladder has a will be overseen by Chinese managers laying down rail lines, bridges, highways, mind of its own. That all these big signs and use Chinese materials and operating and docks. They are building telecom covered with red kanji got us hoping we systems, making them a seamless networks, shipping hubs, and ports. They might find a good Chinese buffet down extension of China’s domestic operations. are creating facial-recognition networks this gravel road. That it sure did feel All of this financed by loans from the and other police infrastructure. They nice to stretch our legs and breathe the Chinese government. Meanwhile, the are snatching up manufacturing plants, mountain air. A burly Chinese officer state-owned Russian oil company Rosneft, pipelines, and refineries. In the first 11 took a picture of our license plate as we operating as a tool of the Kremlin, has months of 2019, Chinese entities signed pulled away. provided the Kurdistan government with 6,055 contracts in 61 countries for Belt $4 billion over the last couple years to and Road projects costing $128 billion. gain effective control over the large oil During a half-day drive across the wo weeks later in Serbia I and gas resources in Iraq’s north. tiny but strategic country of Georgia I T saw more Belt and Road And it’s not just countries I visited peered down into half a dozen camps like projects: A bridge across like Georgia, Serbia, and Iraq. Across the one pictured here, where Chinese the Danube in Belgrade. The new the globe, Russians are newly assertive laborers, engineers, and equipment were A2 motorway. Tunnels. Rail lines. in their foreign policy, and hundreds digging, blasting, and pouring concrete. Huge tire and steel plants taken over of thousands of Chinese are toiling I asked my traveling companions if we by Chinese state-owned firms. All in Belt and Road work camps. The 4 PHILANTHROPY Chinese are building thousands of miles might employ big industrial policies to to complete similar projects would be of road and rail, 42 seaports, and plan curry favor with poor citizens abroad many multiples of what the Chinese to spend $900 billion in 70 countries just makes us giggle. Our bureaucratic are spending. We can’t beat them at over the foreseeable future—drawing agencies can‘t run a reliable health that game. many strategic, resource-rich, contested service for Native Americans or So are we powerless to respond? countries into their orbit. veterans, oversee efficient train or Have we been checkmated by today’s postal operations, or keep homeless savvy, if sometimes brutal, exercises encampments from blocking in power politics by the Chinese and oes the U.S. government commuter traffic. Russian regimes? Must we just sit on our D need its own mega programs Building edifice complexes across hands and watch contested parts of the to mirror these aggressive the developing world is not something globe turn sullen toward us and indebted Chinese and Russian moves? A new our federal government could pull to our opponents? Marshall Plan for the information era? off. The Chinese send thousands In a word: No. An infrastructure blitz for huddled of workers to remote regions for masses all around the world? multi-year stints, where they sleep Or maybe we need our version of in dormitory bunk beds and live on irst of all, most of the Chinese the Chinese military mobilization that cafeteria food. Our nation lacks the F investments will have less has dredged fresh islands in the South social regimentation to accomplish ultimate value to the recipient China Sea and then armed them? Is that. At American levels of wages, nations than might appear. Belt and their system of high-tech personal worker protection, capital expense, and Road contracts stipulate that most work monitoring and dissent-suppression the environmental care, the costs for us be carried out by Chinese workers, that way of the future? Must we organize a counterpart to the disinformation and commando operations the Russians have used to seize territory in Ukraine, Georgia, Syria, and elsewhere? Mega projects sometimes create mega problems. Lord save us! Those strong-arm Human-to-human contact tactics are not American methods. Karl Zinsmeister Karl And the notion that Washington can be a good counter measure. SPRING 2020 5 benefactions machinery must be bought from Chinese A gauntlet has been thrown down firms, that capital goods will be imported Commissioner Johannes Hahn. There for Americans. Hard military actions from China tax exempt. All of the trucks is simply “pressure that things are and savvy economic measures will and machines in the adjoining photo were transferred into their ownership” if a be required to navigate it. We’ll also brought in from the People’s Republic. beneficiary can’t repay. need efforts to win hearts and minds, Same with materials. With little local Even as China expands its Belt using the soft strengths of our nation: sourcing, this kind of construction and Road initiative, some countries are the good faith of our people, and the doesn’t offer much economic boost to the beginning to object. Big construction allure of our liberty-based culture. recipient nation. efforts in Pakistan, Malaysia, Nepal, This latter work is often done best To make these transactions easy for Sierra Leone, Myanmar, and other outside of government. host countries, the Chinese offer massive places have been put on hold. Critics It’s far from inevitable that loans. But of course loans must eventually are expressing concern about “debt-trap megalodon will gobble us up. But we be paid back. Experts accuse the Chinese diplomacy,” an attempt to create “tribute can’t just sit still while it circles. We need of hiding the fact that a large fraction of states” that kowtow to Beijing, and a to defend ourselves. And the creativity the public-works projects they sponsor will “new colonialism.” and independence of America’s privately never return their investment, requiring B&R projects often bring funded civil society can be very helpful either permanent subsidies or forfeiture. environmental damage. As the treatment in this. When the Sri Lankan government of the mountain river in my photo hints, The feature article you will read recently found it couldn’t meet the little care is taken on that front, and there starting on page 19 is an embedded payments on a new port, it had to give are complaints of deteriorated land, water, travelogue that sketches some of the ways China a 99-year lease on the facility and air quality.
Recommended publications
  • WBIF Monitoring Report Published
    MONITORING REPORT May 2021 MONITORING REPORT Abbreviations and acronyms AFD Agence Française de Développement KfW kfW Development Bank bn Billion MD Main Design CBA Cost-Benefit Analysis m Million CD Concept Design PD Preliminary Design CEB Council of Europe Development Bank PFG Project Financiers’ Group CF Co-financing / Investment Grant PFS Pre-feasibility Study DD Detailed Design PIU Support to Project Implementation Unit EWBJF European Western Balkans Joint Fund PSD Public Sector Development EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and RBMP River Basin Management Plan Development REEP/REEP Plus Regional Energy Efficiency Programme for EBRD SSF EBRD Shareholder Special Fund the Western Balkans EFA Economic and Financial Appraisal SC Steering Committee EIA Environmental Impact Assessment SD Sector Development EIB European Investment Bank SDP Sector Development Project EFSE European Fund for Southeast Europe SIA Social Impact Assessment ESIA Environmental and Social Impact SOC Social Sector Assessment SOW Supervision of Works ENE Energy Sector TA Technical Assistance ENV Environment Sector TMA Technical and Management Assistance EU European Union ToR Terms of Reference EWBJF European Western Balkans Joint Fund TRA Transport Sector FAA Financial Affordability Analysis WB EDIF Western Balkans Enterprise and Innovation FS Feasibility Study Facility GGF Green for Growth Fund WBG World Bank Group ID Identification WBIF Western Balkans Investment Framework IFI International Financial Institution WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant IPA Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance IPF Infrastructure Project Facility IRS Interest Rate Subsidies This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the Western Balkans Investment Framework and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents.Worldbank.Org
    46730 THE WORLD BANK GROUP WASHINGTON, D.C. TP-23 TRANSPORT PAPERS NOVEMBER 2008 Public Disclosure Authorized Road User Charges: Current Practice and Perspectives in Central and Eastern Europe Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized TRANSPORT SECTOR BOARD ROAD USER CHARGES: CURRENT PRACTICE AND PERSPECTIVES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige THE WORLD BANK WASHINGTON, D.C. © 2008 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This volume is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website
    EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of North Adriatic Ports
    THE ROLE OF NORTH ADRIATIC PORTS Chief Editor: Chen Xin Prepared by Science and Research Centre Koper, Slovenia University of Ljubljana, Slovenia Published by: China-CEE Institute Nonprofit Ltd. Telephone: +36-1-5858-690 E-mail: [email protected] Webpage: www.china-cee.eu Address: 1052, Budapest, Petőfi Sándor utca 11. Chief Editor: Dr. Chen Xin ISBN: 978-615-6124-07-4 Cover design: PONT co.lab Copyright: China-CEE Institute Nonprofit Ltd. The reproduction of the study or parts of the study are prohibited. The findings of the study may only be cited if the source is acknowledged. The Role of North Adriatic Ports Chief Editor: Dr. Chen Xin CHINA-CEE INSTITUTE Budapest, July 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ........................................................................................................ 3 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 5 2 PREVIOUS STUDIES .............................................................................. 8 3 NORTH ADRIATIC PORTS .................................................................. 11 3.1 Overview of the five main northern Adriatic ports .......................... 12 3.1.1 Ravenna................................................................................... 12 3.1.2 Venice (Venezia) ..................................................................... 15 3.1.3 Trieste ..................................................................................... 18 3.1.4 Koper .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Touch & Go and Touch 2 with Go
    Touch & Go and Touch 2 with Go Autumn 2018 map update release notes 4 more pages required in Autumn edition to fit information Keeping up to date with The Toyota Map Update Release Notes Map update information these and many more features: Touch & Go (CY11) helps you stay on track with the map Full map navigation Release date: Autumn 2018 Driver-friendly full map pan-European navigation updates of the Touch & Go and Touch 2 Version: 2018 with clear visual displays for signposts, junctions and lane with Go navigation systems. Database: 2018.Q1 guidance. Media: USB stick or download by user Speed limit and safety Toyota map updates are released at least once a year System vendor: Harman camera alerts Drive safely with the help of a and at a maximum twice. Coverage: Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia Herzegovina, speed limit display and warning, including an optional Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Gibraltar, France, speed warning setting. Alerts Keep up with the product information, map changes, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Latvia, notify you of fixed safety Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia (F.Y.R.O.M), Malta, Moldova, camera locations (in countries premium content and sales arguments. where it is legal). Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, San Marino, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Vatican. Intuitive detour suggestions Real-time traffic information Contents updates* alert you to Touch 2 with Go (CY13/16) congestion ahead on your planned route. The system Map update information 3 Release date: Autumn, 2018 calculates potential delay times and suggests a detour Navigation features 4 Version: 2018 to avoid the problem.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.4.5 Environmental Influences - 51 - Chapter 6
    POLITECNICO DI MILANO China’s “Belt and Road” Initiative and Its Spatial Impacts in Europe: Case study on projects in European countries with “B&R” involving Graduation Thesis Master of Urban Planning and Policy Design School of Architecture Urban Planning Construction Engineering(AUIC) ZHANG ZHEN KAI Supervisor: Prof. Valeria Fedeli Student Number:850133 2019 I Abstract: China proposed a global strategy, “The Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st-century Maritime Silk Road” (“B&R”), in 2013. It is an initiative of jointly building an economic corridor along the route of ancient “silk road” with countries on it. As of April 30, 2019, 131 countries and 30 international organizations have signed cooperation documents with China on the “B&R”. China came up with a few interventions e.g. China railway express and China-Central and Eastern European Countries cooperation (also known as “17+1”) to adapt “B&R” with European countries. Plenty of projects are developing or developed under “B&R” and “17+1”, the impacts of these projects in terms of urban developing can be concluded to urban transformation, migration, urban integration and urban desertification. To better succeeded the goals of the “B&R”, Communications and cooperation on both governmental and civil fields need to be strengthened and deepened to jointly face the challenges. Key words: “Belt and Road”, Urban transformation, Spatial impact, China, Europe. II Abstract in Italiao: Nel 2013 la Cina ha proposto una strategia globale, “zona economica della via della seta e la via della seta marittima del XXI secolo”("B&R"). È un'iniziativa di costruzione congiunta di un corridoio economico lungo il percorso dell'antica "via della seta" con i paesi su di esso.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Papers June 2009
    49513 THE WORLD BANK GROUP WASHINGTON, D.C. TP-24 TRANSPORT PAPERS JUNE 2009 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized PRIVATE PARTICIPATION IN THE TRANSPORT SECTOR Lessons from Recent Experience in Europe and Central Asia V. Cuttaree, M. Humphreys, S. Muzira, and J-P Strand Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized TRANSPORT SECTOR BOARD PRIVATE PARTICIPATION IN THE TRANSPORT SECTOR Lessons from Recent Experience in Europe and Central Asia V. Cuttaree, M. Humphreys, S. Muzira, and J-P Strand THE WORLD BANK WASHINGTON, D.C. 2009 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This volume is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 18.06.2020
    DAILY REPORT 18.06.2020. DAILY REPORT 18.06.2020. Reporting time: 08.00 h S ERBIA HORGOŠ: • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 3-4 hours, 45 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 4-5 hours, 1.5 km long waiting line. The borderzone is full KELEBIA • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 1-2 hours, 20 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 2-3 hours, 1 km long waiting line. TOVARNIK-ŠID • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 30 minutes, 10 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 1 hours, 10 trucks in the waiting line. BATROVCI • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 3-4 hours, 45 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 1-2 hours, 20 trucks in the waiting line. PREŠEVO BORDER CROSSING • Entry to Serbia: no delays. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. GRADINA • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 2-3 hours, 35 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. VATIN • Entry to Serbia: no delays. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 50 minutes, 6 trucks in the waiting line. As of June 1, Serbia has fully opened its borders with BiH, Montenegro, Albania, North Macedonia, and Bulgaria. DAILY REPORT 18.06.2020. B OSN I A AND HERZEGO VINA Gradiška: • 50 freight vehicles waiting on BiH exit. There is an increased number of passenger vehicles. • Increased number of vehicles on BiH entry, waiting time 2 hour, a lot of passenger vehicles waiting. • jams at the customs terminal Gardiška. Rača: • No vehicles on BIH entry and no delays.
    [Show full text]
  • Rijeka-Zagreb Motorway Construction Starts At
    HRVATSKA UDRUGA KONCESIONARA ZA AUTOCESTE S NAPLATOM CESTARINE CROATIAN ASSOCIATION OF TOLL MOTORWAYS CONCESSIONAIRES Bilten 7. / 2006 RIJEKA-ZAGREB MOTORWAY Financing agreement between the Autocesta Rijeka - Zagreb d.d. and the European Investment Bank and loan agreement between the Re- public of Croatian and the European Investment Bank On March 9, 2006 the Autocesta Rijeka on and Development (EBRD), according to - Zagreb d.d. (ARZ) and the European Inves- which both Banks participated, each with 50 tment Bank (EIB) signed the financing agree- percent, in the amount required for finan- ment amounting to € 210 million, destined cing the Stage I of this project. for financing the stage IIB of the Rijeka - Za- The Stage IIB, i.e. completion of the Ri- greb motorway, i.e. road widening to full mo- jeka - Zagreb motorway by adding the se- The financing agreement concluded torway profile in the length of 44.26 km from cond pavement on the remaining 44.26 between the European Investment Bank Kikovica to Stara Sušica (Vrbovsko) viaduct. km of the semi-motorway, has been divi- and the Autocesta Rijeka - Zagreb d.d. This € 210 million loan, backed by the gu- ded based on time schedule into 5 secti- was signed by the ARZ Board President arantee issued by the Republic of Croatia, is ons. Individual contracts will be concluded Mr. Jurica Prskalo and the EIB Vice-Pre- to be reimbursed within 25 years, while the for the construction of each such section, sident, Mr. Wolfgang Roth, while the gu- grace period is 5 years. The interest rate is while a separate contract will be conclu- arantee agreement entered into between EURIBOR rate + up to 0.13 percent, with ded for the road and tunnel equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Safe Side
    Annual Report 2019 ON THE SAFE SIDE. Annual Report 2019 Annual Report 2019 ON THE SAFE SIDE. STRABAG is a European-based technology group for construction services, a leader in innovation and financial strength. Our services span all areas of the construction industry and cover the entire construction value chain. We bring together people, materials and machinery at the right place and at the right time in order to realise even complex construction projects – on schedule, of the Annual Report 2019 highest quality and at the best price. KEY FIGURES KEY FINANCIAL FIGURES 2015 2016 2017 2018 ∆ % 2019 Output volume (€ mln.) 14,289.76 13,491.03 14,620.89 16,322.88 2 16,617.97 Revenue (€ mln.) 13,123.48 12,400.46 13,508.72 15,221.83 3 15,668.57 Order backlog (€ mln.) 13,134.58 14,815.79 16,591.87 16,899.71 3 17,411.48 Employees (FTE) 73,315 71,839 72,904 75,460 2 76,919 KEY EARNINGS FIGURES 2015 2016 2017 2018 ∆ % 2019 EBITDA (€ mln.) 816.10 855.18 834.58 952.60 17 1,113.30 EBITDA margin (% of revenue) 6.2 6.9 6.2 6.3 7.1 EBIT (€ mln.) 341.04 424.91 448.36 558.21 8 602.58 EBIT adjusted (€ mln.)1 397.10 502.90 EBIT margin (% of revenue) 2.6 3.4 3.3 3.7 3.8 EBIT margin adjusted (% of revenue)1 3.2 3.3 EBT (€ mln.) 316.62 421.13 421.21 530.78 9 577.24 Net income (€ mln.) 182.49 282.00 292.36 362.78 4 378.56 Net income after minorities (€ mln.) 156.29 277.65 278.91 353.53 5 371.70 Net income after minorities margin (% of revenue) 1.2 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.4 Earnings per share (€) 1.52 2.71 2.72 3.45 5 3.62 Cash flow from operating activities (€ mln.)2 1,240.35
    [Show full text]
  • European Public-Private Partnership Transport Market September 2017 European Public-Private Partnership Transport Market
    European Public-Private Partnership transport market September 2017 European Public-Private Partnership transport market Directors Javier Parada Partner in charge of the Infrastructure Industry, Spain Miguel Laserna Directing Partner of Financial Advisory- Infrastructures Coordinated by Karolina Anna Mlodzik Kate McCarthy Published by Deloitte University EMEA CVBA Contact Infrastructure Department Deloitte Madrid Torre Picasso - Plaza Pablo Ruiz Picasso 1, 28020 Madrid, Spain +34 91514 5000 www.deloitte.es September 2017 2 September 2017 Contents INTRODUCTION 5 1. OVERVIEW 1.1. The transport infrastructure gap 6 1.2. 2016 European PPP transport market 9 1.2.1.European greenfield PPP transactions that reached financial close in 2016 9 1.2.2. European greenfield PPP transport projects with a preferred proponent announced in 2016 14 1.2.3. European greenfield PPP transport projects with a pre-qualified or shortlisted proponent in 2016 16 1.2.4. European PPP transport refinancings in 2016 16 1.2.5. European PPP transport M&A transactions in 2016 19 1.3. Conclusions 22 2. THE MAIN PLAYERS 2.1. Top 35 ranking 24 2.2. Main players’ current strategy 25 Main players’ role in the infrastructure lifecycle 25 Sponsors 26 Operators 27 Institutional investors 27 3. CONTEXT FOR EUROPEAN PPPS 3.1. Policy and regulation trends 30 3.1.1. Regulatory changes: Directives 2014/23/UE, 2014/24/UE and 2014/25/UE 30 3.2. Funding and financing trends 32 3.2.1. An investment plan for Europe: the Juncker Plan 33 3.2.2. Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative 39 4. EUROPEAN GREENFIELD PPP TRANSPORT PIPELINE 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 05.05.2020
    DAILY REPORT 05.05.2020. DAILY REPORT 05.05.2020. Reporting time: 13.30 h S ERBIA HORGOŠ: • Entry to Serbia; waiting time 40 minutes, 4-5 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 1-2 hours, 1 km long waiting line. KELEBIA • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 30 minutes, 3 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 2-3 hours, 30 trucks in the waiting line. TOVARNIK-ŠID • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 10 minutes (1 truck). • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 50 minutes, 7 trucks in the waiting line. • On Tovarnik-Šid border crossing, the goods coming from Croatia can enter only if export customs clearance was done in Croatia. The goods going to Croatia for unloading should undergo customs clearance in Croatia. BATROVCI • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 40 minutes, 4 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 4-5 hours, 4 km long waiting line. PREŠEVO BORDER CROSSING • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 50 minutes, 5 trucks in the waiting line • Exit from Serbia: no delays. GRADINA • Entry to Serbia: no delays. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 40 minutes, 5-6 trucks in the waiting line. VATIN • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 20 minutes, 2 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 40 minutes, 4-5 trucks in the waiting line. As of April 6th, there will be no transit traffic towards Romania through border crossings Srpska Crnja and Đerdap. The trucks from Serbia that are transiting through Romania can use Vatin border crossing.
    [Show full text]