OCT 2013 NEWEST ANNOUNCMENTS.Qxd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Natural Resources Section of the Resources Management Plan
NATURAL RESOURCES SECTION OF THE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA Prepared by Golden Gate National Recreation Area National Park Service Department of the Interior December 20, 1999 Prepared by: ___________________________________ Date:_____________ Division of Natural Resource Management and Research Approved by: ___________________________________ Date:_____________ General Superintendent, Golden Gate National Recreation Area NATURAL RESOURCES SECTION OF THE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose of Park Establishment 1 1.2 Purpose of the Plan 1 1.3 Compliance/National Environmental Policy Act 2 2 NATURAL RESOURCES VALUES 3 2.1 Geography, Geology and Minerals 3 2.2 Water Resources 4 2.3 Plant Resources 4 2.4 Rare and Endangered Species 4 2.5 Wildlife Resources 5 2.6 Marine Resources 15 2.7 Air Resources and Night Sky 16 3 CONDITIONS AND THREATS TO NATURAL RESOURCES 19 3.1 Geologic and Mineral Resources 19 3.2 Water Resources 20 3.3 Plant Resources 22 3.4 Rare and Endangered Species 24 3.5 Wildlife Resources 31 3.6 Marine Resources 34 3.7 Air Resources and Night Sky 36 4 GGNRA NATURAL RESOURCE PROGRAM 37 4.1 Objectives of the Natural Resource Program 37 4.2 Inventory and Monitoring (Vital Signs) — an Integrated Program 38 4.3 Restoration — an Integrated Program 38 4.4 Wildlife Program 41 4.5 Integrated Pest Management (IPM) 55 4.6 Vegetation Program 55 4.7 Forestry Program 65 4.8 Range Inventory and Management 67 4.9 Prescribed Fire Management 67 4.10 Aquatic/Hydrology -
The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. -
Northstarnews Mayl06color
Volume 37 Number 5 May 2006 Trips I Have Taken Oh So Long Ago - To Kansas City For Ball Games — By H. Martin Swan Inside this issue Missouri Pacific’s Missouri River Eagle at Kansas City. Photo-Courtesy H. Martin Swan Officer Contact List P.2 Membership Information P.2 Meeting Notice The May meeting of the Northstar Chapter will be at 7pm May 20 The President’s Page P.2 at the St. Paul Fire Department Training Center, 1695 Energy Park Trips I Have Taken Oh So Long Ago- P.3 Drive, St. Paul (Snelling and Energy Park Drive just east of Midway Kansas City Stadium). Mike Mackner will show a program on Civil War railroading. Interchange Track P.4 What’s In A Name? P.5 Rail Camp Manager Terminated P.7 April Meeting Minutes P.7 Page Northstar Chapter Officers Board of Directors President H. Martin Swan Email: [email protected] Phone: 612-961-1684 Vice President Mark Braun Email: [email protected] Phone: 320-587-2279 Past President Bill Herzog Email [email protected] Phone: 952-470-4021 National Director Doug Johnson Email: [email protected] Phone: 612-825-6458 Treasurer Joe Fishbein Email: [email protected] Phone: 651-457-1610 Secretary Dave Norman Email:[email protected] Phone: 612-729-2428 Trustee Dennis Louden Email: [email protected] Phone: 651-698-8559 Staff Program Chairman John Goodman Email: [email protected] Newsletter Editor Russ Isbrandt Email: [email protected] Phone: 651-426-1156 Webmaster Dan Meyer Website: www.northstar-nrhs.org Note: Consult the website for any announcements regarding Chapter activities including cancellation of meeting for any reason including weather. -
Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations
Pursuant to Section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-432, Division B): Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations Covering the Quarter Ended June, 2019 (Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2019) Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation Published August 2019 Table of Contents (Notes follow on the next page.) Financial Table 1 (A/B): Short-Term Avoidable Operating Costs (Note 1) Table 2 (A/B): Fully Allocated Operating Cost covered by Passenger-Related Revenue Table 3 (A/B): Long-Term Avoidable Operating Loss (Note 1) Table 4 (A/B): Adjusted Loss per Passenger- Mile Table 5: Passenger-Miles per Train-Mile On-Time Performance (Table 6) Test No. 1 Change in Effective Speed Test No. 2 Endpoint OTP Test No. 3 All-Stations OTP Train Delays Train Delays - Off NEC Table 7: Off-NEC Host Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Table 8: Off-NEC Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Train Delays - On NEC Table 9: On-NEC Total Host and Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Other Service Quality Table 10: Customer Satisfaction Indicator (eCSI) Scores Table 11: Service Interruptions per 10,000 Train-Miles due to Equipment-related Problems Table 12: Complaints Received Table 13: Food-related Complaints Table 14: Personnel-related Complaints Table 15: Equipment-related Complaints Table 16: Station-related Complaints Public Benefits (Table 17) Connectivity Measure Availability of Other Modes Reference Materials Table 18: Route Descriptions Terminology & Definitions Table 19: Delay Code Definitions Table 20: Host Railroad Code Definitions Appendixes A. -
20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad -
Adding Passenger Service
A Modeler’s Aid Clinic Passenger Operations Conducted By Bruce Knapp How to integrate Passenger Trains into your operating sessions or How the Santa Fe Operated Passenger Service Why Passenger Service? Period and Equipment 1830 to 1850 Revenue Wood cars - usually stage coach bodies Advertising 1850 to 1870 Show off your modeling skills Wood cars built for railroad use Introduce sleeping cars Add interest Introduce air brakes & knuckle couplers Visitors like passenger trains 1880 to 1900 Introduce dining cars You make Walthers and Rapido very happy Introduce steam heat You also make local hobby dealers happy Introduce electric lighting Introduce vestibules and diaphragms Two Typical Wood Cars Period and Equipment 1900 to 1930 steel cars become standard air conditioning introduced All-reserved “name trains” 1930 to 1970 streamlining introduced “passenger specific” color schemes common high speed steam and diesels introduced 1971 to Present Amtrak formed Types of Passenger Service Mixed Train Combine Premier Class [Named Trains] Normal Service [Named or numbered] Local Service [locomotive & cars] Local Service [single unit] Commuter Service Mail & Express Trains Mixed Train Service Fan Trip [especially steam] Famous “Name Trains” Assigned Locomotives Chief, El Capitan, Super Chief: ATSF Steam [1940’s to 1960’s] th 20 Century Limited, Ohio Limited: NYC First Class: 4-6-2, 4-6-4, 4-8-2, 4-8-4 Broadway Limited: PRR The Hummingbird: L&N Local Service: 4-4-2, 4-6-2, 4-6-4 City of Los Angeles, City of San Francisco: UP Mixed Train: 2-8-0, 4-6-0, -
Great Passenger Trains
SOUTHERN PACIFIC PASSENGER TRAINS Dcdication 1.tt, tt/!nt tr. tr.,....,,, t.\1,:1.r., 1,',.\ll{l I'1,.. Orrhe6rcl(cndpipt^: \/r'.r" l']t tti,\ ),,n\,tt "l " ,,,.,r'-ll ..\'' !l''.\l\ tr't.; s e,R n,t 7'\lin rl,l;n'rt uri'trtrn I'ri rrt''' i i J.l {' L\rtrlror Lrb^ t|, tt! Ln \Lt.' r"n\, ]'// r 1.rP sfi " Bnct covea main: r,rl{/ /rrr. s,t ) | u 1)i n; }'t1') i I I t t nrn ) qt t $ttr l,\li.{}! t'ta t" Wirf nrr.r!rlnD..J Llu!,n!lrrrcl,)i*r!s J;r rhr I),\11!ht l.llq!l ,rt,l' ',1 1l', t.tt, ltit rll .\ll rish. ,c{1.(l /i'' n'r,,,,, ,, '| ,| h: s;".;--h R.tti" K, .tt tt: , t;lht nt|lttt, tht nr\'] tith"! Rlr.t &t 1)rrru (;r/r,d; Ilrnn SrJ'irnl srli ,t r"r,',, !rtr\,' t , rl lll'lrl r fit.iD nlI nFcr: ri 7ri7. J'a/ t.ru li;lit r\,l|lt' rh,t\'r't o l. 'lr . Bi.Lcovcr, 'r' ' \n r t Li u t' l b rt r t\, r t't' rt lnr\vl(lsr '\llr(nn nh.o.' r. nrklr..rNrtr rnrA!'ril" 'ri lh ti! n, tl,r',l i'rr " oi rtn,pl trt ,'\trnrtr nn[1ni l.' ."1,'."J .'lr', ""r' r,tt/,r ! r t j r,- r,, ,,,, t.. ,. .t .t Krl,L'run, 'll,i. ml,li..ti,", hA n,n lJ.c. -
Steel Wheels 4Q20 Web.Pdf
Arizona News All Aboard Arizona Todd Liebman, President For well over a hundred and rail corridor between Los Angeles-Phoenix-Tucson and even thirty years, passenger trains further east to El Paso would be an economic driver for have been a daily fixture Arizona. Arizona’s congested transportation system diminishes of life in Northern Arizona, the quality of life for Arizonans increasing air pollution, literally building communities congestion related delays, and negatively impacting the state’s like Flagstaff and Winslow, economy. Conversely, for a relatively small investment, Amtrak bringing economic activity could return to Phoenix, the Sunset Limited/Texas Eagle to the cities served along Route 66. That came to an end in could operate daily, and the Southwest Chief could return October when Amtrak reduced the Southwest Chief route to to daily service across Northern Arizona. It is often in rural three day per week service, along with all long-distance train communities, like Yuma and Winslow, where passenger rail service in the United States. This cutback is expected to create has the biggest impact. These communities have fewer public economic losses of $239 million in the first nine months to transportation options, and the train serves as a vital lifeline for the communities served from Chicago to Los Angeles. These residents and visitors alike. cuts will not help Amtrak’s bottom line and may do permanent The outlook does not have to be bleak. We can achieve our damage to ridership and the financial health of passenger rail in goals related to daily Amtrak service on routes across Arizona America, and to the communities served by rail. -
Q1-2 2021 Newsletter
Northwest Rail News 1st & 2nd Quarter 2021 statewide ‘High Speed Ground Transportation’ Reviving a Rail (HSGT) system. The next year, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) designated the Pacific Revolution: How Northwest Rail Corridor, which runs through the HSR in Washington heart of Seattle, as a high-speed rail (HSR) corridor. With the results of the earlier HSGT study in, the Can Get Back On 1993 Washington State Legislature passed RCW Chapter 47.79 and created something revolutionary: Track By Patrick Carnahan — Seattle, WA a goal to build a regional HSR network connecting Seattle with Portland, Spokane, and Vancouver, Amidst the fallout of the coronavirus pandemic, British Columbia by 2030. As recommended by the interest in passenger rail has increased markedly study, Washington and Oregon began implementing across the United States. With an enthusiastically modern intercity passenger rail service on existing pro-rail federal administration now in power, talk of tracks between Vancouver, BC and Eugene, OR, with our nation’s “second great railroading revolution” the goal of increasing this service’s top speed to 110 has begun among advocates and transit blogs from mph. From this came Amtrak Cascades, one of the coast to coast. But is this only our second, or even nation’s most successful intercity passenger rail third, attempt at such a revolution? What about the services. Following the study’s vision, the one that started in the Pacific Northwest around 30 Washington State and Oregon Departments of years ago, the one that aimed to create the most Transportation (WSDOT and ODOT) both created advanced rail system in North America? bold long-range plans for Cascades that would dramatically increase the line’s frequency and Where It Started usefulness. -
Copy the Vocabulary of Unit 3 (Pp
Englisch 8a Topic 1 Vocabulary unit 3 Topic 2 California Topic 1 Vocabulary unit 3 Task: Copy the vocabulary of unit 3 (pp. 179 – 184) (Don’t forget: In our first “real“ English lesson we are going to write a vocbulary test, p. 181) Topic 2 California (aus: Cornelsen Verlag Berlin, Lernen an Stationen, Englisch, California) Tasks: See working sheets (Arbeitsblätter können ausgedruckt oder abgeschrieben werden, Informationstexte müssen nicht abgeschrieben werden; fertige Materialien werden in die Englischmappe geheftet. Falls ein Informationsflyer gebastelt wird, bitte in eine Folie legen und diese einheften) - San Francisco: The Golden Gate Bridge (Aufgabe 3: Mach einen Informationsflyer über die Golden Gate Bridge, mit Bildern/Fotos und Text – natürlich auf Englisch ) - Hollywood (Aufgabe 4: Schreibt und zeichnet eine Werbeanzeige für eine Studio Führung – natürlich auf Englisch ) - Meeting famous people from California: *Levi Strauss and the blue jeans *Walt Disney Being in San Francisco The Golden Gate Bridge One of the most famous and most beautiful bridges in the world is the Golden Gate Bridge – gateway to the Pacific Ocean. It was built from 1933 to 1937 and connects San Francisco and the Marina Peninsula County. For years San Francisco Bay had to be crossed by ferries before the bridge was built. There weren’t enough ferries, so they started building the 2,727-metre-long bridge, which is now one of the longest suspension bridges in the world. When the miners came to San Francisco during the gold rush, San Francisco harbour got the name “Golden Gate”, so the bridge was given this name too. First the engineer, the German American Joseph Strauss, wanted to paint the bridge grey. -
A Friend in Need••
ISSUE 134 - Mar/Apr 2006 The Train Sheet A FRIEND IN NEED••. Locomotive Association in an impressive display of - Eugene John Vicknair cooperation. Now, every minute of time packing journals, repairing brakes and welding step wells San Francisco, CA - Sunday, February 26 - 1:30 PM comes down to this early morning move. Days of shuttling cars over rickety industrial trackage There is a small crowd gathered near the "Coke strewn with debris and encroached by wayward Spur" in San Francisco's Bayview neighborhood. trucks has eventually brought over 30 passenger Radio chatter can be heard from several handheld and freight cars out of Hunter's Point. FRRS units. Many of those milling around are noticeably President Rod McClure sits in the cab ofWP GP7 tired and there is a nervous energy in the air. 707, waiting for word from his crew that all is Nearby, sitting on the former Southern Pacific ready. Yardmaster Steve Habeck clears the train for double track mainline, is the beginnings of a train movement and McClure replies and reaches for the the likes of which has never been seen in The City. throttle. On the ground, the small crowd calls out And idling at the headend is a set of familiar as the 707 blasts her horn. orange and silver locomotives, running on decidedly unfamiliar rails. 'They're moving!" Their purpose is to muscle the bulk of the Golden The massive effort to relocate the majority of Gate Railroad Museum's collection to a new GGRM's equipment began several months location. Most of the train's crew has been away earlier. -
OCT 2013 NEWEST ANNOUNCMENTS.Qxd
NEWEST ANNOUNCEMENTS 2017 ACE 3000 The most Unique Steam Modern Steam Locomotive Locomotive Design Ever The ACE 3000 was a prototype mod- Concieved. Never Before ern 4-8-2 coal-burning steam locomo- Produced in any Scale. With tive which was designed in the late the permission from Mr. 1970s to early '80s by Ross Rowland, L. D. Porta, and a design team from the Rowlands, Sunset Models American Coal Enterprises company. will reproduce this model in a variety of Liveries, as it was intended to be. The front unit is a 4-8-2 duplex while the rear unit is unpowered. To make this project possible we need your Reservation!!! Built for main-line service, these B&O EL-3 & EL-5 HUGE articulateds (2-8-8-0) were delivered in 4 batches over a 20 2-8-8-0 year period. Sunset Models is going to produce a model of the EL-3 as compound Mallets (With Huge Low Pressure Front Cylinders) as they were pre-1927, and the EL-5 as a simple-expan- sion 4 cylinder locomotive as they ran post-1927. Your reservation is what makes these projects hap- pen, so if you want one, don't just B&O EL-5 Shown sit there, reserve one TODAY!!! EMD SD40-2 Diesels Announcing the EMD SD40-2 as never before produced in O Scale. Scale Accurate. ABS Body, Die Cast Trucks, Fixed Pilot, All Drivers Powered with real ball bearing journals and Full Cab Interior Lighted, Horizontal Motor Design (NO CHINA DRIVE), These fantastic models will perform smoothly and powerfully just like the prototye.