Natural Resources Section of the Resources Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Natural Resources Section of the Resources Management Plan NATURAL RESOURCES SECTION OF THE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA Prepared by Golden Gate National Recreation Area National Park Service Department of the Interior December 20, 1999 Prepared by: ___________________________________ Date:_____________ Division of Natural Resource Management and Research Approved by: ___________________________________ Date:_____________ General Superintendent, Golden Gate National Recreation Area NATURAL RESOURCES SECTION OF THE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose of Park Establishment 1 1.2 Purpose of the Plan 1 1.3 Compliance/National Environmental Policy Act 2 2 NATURAL RESOURCES VALUES 3 2.1 Geography, Geology and Minerals 3 2.2 Water Resources 4 2.3 Plant Resources 4 2.4 Rare and Endangered Species 4 2.5 Wildlife Resources 5 2.6 Marine Resources 15 2.7 Air Resources and Night Sky 16 3 CONDITIONS AND THREATS TO NATURAL RESOURCES 19 3.1 Geologic and Mineral Resources 19 3.2 Water Resources 20 3.3 Plant Resources 22 3.4 Rare and Endangered Species 24 3.5 Wildlife Resources 31 3.6 Marine Resources 34 3.7 Air Resources and Night Sky 36 4 GGNRA NATURAL RESOURCE PROGRAM 37 4.1 Objectives of the Natural Resource Program 37 4.2 Inventory and Monitoring (Vital Signs) — an Integrated Program 38 4.3 Restoration — an Integrated Program 38 4.4 Wildlife Program 41 4.5 Integrated Pest Management (IPM) 55 4.6 Vegetation Program 55 4.7 Forestry Program 65 4.8 Range Inventory and Management 67 4.9 Prescribed Fire Management 67 4.10 Aquatic/Hydrology Program 68 4.11 Physical Resources Program 75 4.12 Geographic Information System (GIS) Program 77 4.13 Research Program 79 4.14 Special Ecological Areas 80 5 STAFFING PLAN FOR GGNRA NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 83 5.1 Base Needs as Allocated by R-MAP 83 5.2 Staffing Organization 83 NRS_RMP iii Natural Resources Section of the Resource Management Plan 6 BIBLIOGRAPHY 87 6.1 References Cited 87 6.2 Personal Communications 90 APPENDICES Appendix A: Approach to Native Plant Habitat Restoration A-1 Appendix B: Approach to Non-Native Plant Management B-1 Appendix C: Approach to Rare Plant Management C-1 Appendix D: Synthesis of Existing Vegetation Monitoring Program D-1 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Special Status Species of Golden Gate National Recreation Area 6 Table 2. Significant Marine Resources in the Golden Gate National Recreation Area 15 Table 3. Sensitive Plant Threats and Recovery Actions 28 1 INTRODUCTION Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) was created from a vision to protect and promote the enjoyment of the natural and cultural resources on the edge of the urban San Francisco Bay Area communities. The vast natural resources that existed in the bay estuary and its environs prior to 1800 have been reduced to minute remnants, which are protected in a handful of national, state and local parks and open space. The opportunity exists in GGNRA to preserve the last remnants of what was once an abundant flora and fauna. This Natural Resources Management Plan documents the extent and condition of and threats to the natural resources of GGNRA, and lays a foundation for actions to preserve and restore, where necessary, the Californian habitats, and ecosystems on which they depend. It is complementary to and consistent with other National Park Service (NPS) and GGNRA management documents. 1.1 Purpose of Park Establishment The National Park Service Act of 1916 created the NPS: “. to conserve the scenery and natural and historic objects and the wildlife therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations.” GGNRA is administered by the NPS. One mandate for all national park units is to preserve natural resources values. GGNRA’s enabling legislation states that the park was founded: “In order to preserve for public use and enjoyment certain areas of Marin and San Francisco possessing outstanding natural, historic, scenic and recreational values . .” The act stated that management of the park: “. shall utilize the resources in a manner which will provide for recreation and educational opportunities consistent with sound principles of land use planning and management.” The act charges the Secretary to: “. preserve the recreation area, as far as possible, in its natural setting, and protect it from development and uses which would destroy the scenic beauty and natural character of the area.” 1.2 Purpose of the Plan This Natural Resources Management Plan identifies GGNRA’s natural resources and their condition. It describes a program to preserve, monitor, maintain, and restore, where necessary, the natural California habitats, and ecosystems on which they depend. The ever-growing metropolitan population adjacent to these natural areas exerts a great pressure to over-utilize the fragile natural systems that remain. This plan identifies these pressures and provides strategies for protecting the natural systems and resources. This plan is complementary to and consistent with other NPS and GGNRA management documents including the NPS Policies (1989), Statement for Management (1990), the General Management Plan (1980), and the Presidio General Management Plan (1994). This plan revises the previous Natural X:\Admin_&_Management_(A)\RMP12-1999\NRS_RMP.doc 1 Natural Resources Section of the Resource Management Plan Resources Management Plan (1994) and addenda (1982, 1984, 1987). The existing focused plans (Fire Management Plan, 1986; Water Resources Management Plan, 1991) were written as supplemental components of the 1994 Natural Resources Management Plan. The current plan is also consistent with the goals and objectives of the United Nations Man in the Biosphere program. GGNRA is a member of this program as part of the Central California Coast Biosphere Reserve. 1.3 Compliance/National Environmental Policy Act Compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other resource protection legislation is not accomplished through the Natural Resources Management Plan. Each Project Statement includes a section on the need for compliance, or indicates whether a project is categorically excluded from the NEPA process. NPS guidelines for Resources Management Plans require that environmental compliance be undertaken when funding is likely. Environmental documents for appropriate projects will be completed prior to any irreversible or irretrievable commitment of funds or efforts to a particular course of action, beyond planning. X:\Admin_&_Management_(A)\RMP12-1999\NRS_RMP.doc 2 2 NATURAL RESOURCES VALUES 2.1 Geography, Geology and Minerals GGNRA comprises approximately 75,000 acres of coastal lands in the San Francisco Bay Area. This long, narrow park is divided by the Golden Gate entrance to San Francisco Bay, which separates the northern Marin County lands from the southern San Francisco and San Mateo county lands. The topographical relief of the park ranges from sea level to 2,300 feet above mean sea level near the top of Mt. Tamalpais. Hillslopes range from almost flat marine terraces and alluvial deposits to steep canyons along some creeks, and near vertical bluffs above some beaches. Most watersheds are less than one square mile in area, and flow through narrow V-shaped stream beds cut through bedrock. Stream channel gradients range from 3 percent, in Elk Creek, to 35 percent, in steep tributaries on Bolinas Ridge. GGNRA is located in a seismically active zone. The San Andreas Fault extends northwest from near Fort Funston, and runs through Bolinas Lagoon and Tomales Bay. The San Andreas is the major fault in the area, but many smaller faults also exist. Movement on the San Andreas continues at an average of about 1 to 2 centimeters per year. This movement is expressed as a violent earthquake occurring about once a century. Many earthquakes of lesser magnitude occur along the length of the fault. Bedrock parent materials within the park are jumbled, as a result of grinding movement along the San Andreas Fault. Sandstone, pillow basalts, shale, Chert, greenstone (basalt), serpentine, and metamorphic rocks are among the bedrock types present. These rocks belong to the Franciscan Assemblage and were originally deposited on the ocean floor 80 to 140 million years ago. The rocks were greatly deformed and partly metamorphosed as the ocean floor was thrust under the western edge of the North American Plate, resulting in a landscape of easily eroded, sheared and crushed sandstone and shale, with occasional blocks of more resistant rock forming prominent outcrops. The Marin Headlands contains more resistant rocks than the more erodible Franciscan Melange found to the north of Pirates Cove. Radiolarian chert composed of fossilized radiolaria underlies about half of the Headlands, and because of its resistance to weathering, makes up nearly all the ridge tops and summits. The contorted layers in this chert express the plate-tectonic actions in this area and are frequently visited by geology classes. Topographically, melange areas have broader ridge crests and gentler slopes and contain more earthflows than the coherent Marin Headlands. Groundwater is close to the surface and frequently emerges as seeps or springs in the melange area. Locally, especially in the southwest part of San Francisco, are younger rocks, soft sedimentary deposits that are less than two million years old. The sea cliffs at Fort Funston were formed from the oldest of these tilted fossil-rich beds of sand and clay (the Merced Formation), and are easily eroded by wave action. In the last few hundred thousand years, sand and clay have accumulated as beaches, dunes and nearshore deposits, and these are now exposed at Sutro Heights, Baker Beach, Angel Island and Rodeo Cove. Many abandoned quarries are found within GGNRA. Dogtown Copper Mine, located just off Bolinas Ridge, is the only known mineral development in the park. It was developed in 1863 and re-worked around the turn of the century.
Recommended publications
  • The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Get PDF Salt Evaporation Pond
    I7YJMSA8ZXXW > Book # Salt Evaporation Pond Salt Evaporation Pond Filesize: 8.01 MB Reviews This ebook might be worth a read, and superior to other. It is probably the most amazing publication we have read. Your lifestyle period will likely be transform once you total looking over this publication. (Alana McCullough) DISCLAIMER | DMCA KTGINKSOL3G5 ~ Doc Salt Evaporation Pond SALT EVAPORATION POND Betascript Publishers Jan 2010, 2010. Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. Neuware - High Quality Content by WIKIPEDIA articles! Salt evaporation ponds are shallow man-made ponds designed to produce salts from sea water or other brines. The seawater or brine is fed into large ponds and water is drawn out through natural evaporation which allows the salt to be subsequently harvested. The ponds also provide a productive resting and feeding ground for many species of waterbirds, including several endangered species. The ponds are commonly separated by levees. Due to variable algal concentrations, vivid colors, from pale green to bright red, are created in the evaporation ponds. The color indicates the salinity of the ponds. Micro-organisms change their hues as the salinity of the pond increases. In low to mid-salinity ponds, green algae are predominant. In middle to high salinity ponds, an algae called Dunaliella salina shis the color to red. Millions of tiny brine shrimp create an orange cast in mid- salinity ponds. Other bacteria such as Stichococcus also contribute tints. 80 pp. Englisch. Read Salt Evaporation Pond Online Download PDF Salt Evaporation Pond QLWVIHJYBBW4 < eBook « Salt Evaporation Pond You May Also Like Crochet: Learn How to Make Money with Crochet and Create 10 Most Popular Crochet Patterns for Sale: ( Learn to Read Crochet Patterns, Charts, and Graphs, Beginner s Crochet Guide with Pictures) Createspace, United States, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • South Bay Salt Ponds Initial Stewardship Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement
    South Bay Salt Ponds Initial Stewardship Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement December 2003 Submitted by: California Department of United States Fish and Fish and Game Wildlife Service SOUTH BAY SALT PONDS INITIAL STEWARDSHIP PLAN NOTICE: This document represents a Draft EIR/EIS prepared by California Department of Fish and Game and the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Due to differences in publication requirements, the CEQA and NEPA documents will have different circulation times. CEQA: The Draft EIR/EIS will be circulated for a 45-day public and agency review period, beginning with the publication of this document on December 22, 2003 and ending 45 days after this date. Copies of the document have been made available to applicable local, state, and federal agencies and to interested organizations and individuals wishing to review and comment on the report. Written comments will be received by CDFG at the following address: Carl Wilcox Habitat Conservation Manager California Department of Fish and Game Region 3 Headquarters P.O. Box 47 Yountville, CA 94599 FAX (707) 944-5563 NEPA: USFWS will consider all comments on the DEIR/EIS provided by the public and federal, state, and local agencies within the 45-day comment period starting upon publication in the Federal Register. Written comments will be received by USFWS at the following address: Margaret Kolar Refuge Manager U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service San Francisco Bay NWR Complex P.O. Box 524 Newark, California 94560 FAX: (510) 792-5828 Email: [email protected] Draft South Bay Salt Pond Initial Stewardship Project Environmental Impact Report / Environmental Impact Statement Prepared for: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Copy the Vocabulary of Unit 3 (Pp
    Englisch 8a Topic 1 Vocabulary unit 3 Topic 2 California Topic 1 Vocabulary unit 3 Task: Copy the vocabulary of unit 3 (pp. 179 – 184) (Don’t forget: In our first “real“ English lesson we are going to write a vocbulary test, p. 181) Topic 2 California (aus: Cornelsen Verlag Berlin, Lernen an Stationen, Englisch, California) Tasks: See working sheets (Arbeitsblätter können ausgedruckt oder abgeschrieben werden, Informationstexte müssen nicht abgeschrieben werden; fertige Materialien werden in die Englischmappe geheftet. Falls ein Informationsflyer gebastelt wird, bitte in eine Folie legen und diese einheften) - San Francisco: The Golden Gate Bridge (Aufgabe 3: Mach einen Informationsflyer über die Golden Gate Bridge, mit Bildern/Fotos und Text – natürlich auf Englisch ) - Hollywood (Aufgabe 4: Schreibt und zeichnet eine Werbeanzeige für eine Studio Führung – natürlich auf Englisch ) - Meeting famous people from California: *Levi Strauss and the blue jeans *Walt Disney Being in San Francisco The Golden Gate Bridge One of the most famous and most beautiful bridges in the world is the Golden Gate Bridge – gateway to the Pacific Ocean. It was built from 1933 to 1937 and connects San Francisco and the Marina Peninsula County. For years San Francisco Bay had to be crossed by ferries before the bridge was built. There weren’t enough ferries, so they started building the 2,727-metre-long bridge, which is now one of the longest suspension bridges in the world. When the miners came to San Francisco during the gold rush, San Francisco harbour got the name “Golden Gate”, so the bridge was given this name too. First the engineer, the German American Joseph Strauss, wanted to paint the bridge grey.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Flora of Rarău Massif (Eastern Carpathians, Romania). Note Ii
    Memoirs of the Scientific Sections of the Romanian Academy Tome XXXVI, 2013 BIOLOGY THE VASCULAR FLORA OF RARĂU MASSIF (EASTERN CARPATHIANS, ROMANIA). NOTE II ADRIAN OPREA1 and CULIŢĂ SÎRBU2 1 “Anastasie Fătu” Botanical Garden, Str. Dumbrava Roşie, nr. 7-9, 700522–Iaşi, Romania 2 University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Iaşi, Faculty of Agriculture, Str. Mihail Sadoveanu, nr. 3, 700490–Iaşi, Romania Corresponding author: [email protected] This second part of the paper about the vascular flora of Rarău Massif listed approximately half of the whole number of the species registered by the authors in their field trips or already included in literature on the same area. Other taxa have been added to the initial list of plants, so that, the total number of taxa registered by the authors in Rarău Massif amount to 1443 taxa (1133 species and 310 subspecies, varieties and forms). There was signaled out the alien taxa on the surveyed area (18 species) and those dubious presence of some taxa for the same area (17 species). Also, there were listed all the vascular plants, protected by various laws or regulations, both internal or international, existing in Rarău (i.e. 189 taxa). Finally, there has been assessed the degree of wild flora conservation, using several indicators introduced in literature by Nowak, as they are: conservation indicator (C), threat conservation indicator) (CK), sozophytisation indicator (W), and conservation effectiveness indicator (E). Key words: Vascular flora, Rarău Massif, Romania, conservation indicators. 1. INTRODUCTION A comprehensive analysis of Rarău flora, in terms of plant diversity, taxonomic structure, biological, ecological and phytogeographic characteristics, as well as in terms of the richness in endemics, relict or threatened plant species was published in our previous note (see Oprea & Sîrbu 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • A Friend in Need••
    ISSUE 134 - Mar/Apr 2006 The Train Sheet A FRIEND IN NEED••. Locomotive Association in an impressive display of - Eugene John Vicknair cooperation. Now, every minute of time packing journals, repairing brakes and welding step wells San Francisco, CA - Sunday, February 26 - 1:30 PM comes down to this early morning move. Days of shuttling cars over rickety industrial trackage There is a small crowd gathered near the "Coke strewn with debris and encroached by wayward Spur" in San Francisco's Bayview neighborhood. trucks has eventually brought over 30 passenger Radio chatter can be heard from several handheld and freight cars out of Hunter's Point. FRRS units. Many of those milling around are noticeably President Rod McClure sits in the cab ofWP GP7 tired and there is a nervous energy in the air. 707, waiting for word from his crew that all is Nearby, sitting on the former Southern Pacific ready. Yardmaster Steve Habeck clears the train for double track mainline, is the beginnings of a train movement and McClure replies and reaches for the the likes of which has never been seen in The City. throttle. On the ground, the small crowd calls out And idling at the headend is a set of familiar as the 707 blasts her horn. orange and silver locomotives, running on decidedly unfamiliar rails. 'They're moving!" Their purpose is to muscle the bulk of the Golden The massive effort to relocate the majority of Gate Railroad Museum's collection to a new GGRM's equipment began several months location. Most of the train's crew has been away earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybridization in Compositae
    Hybridization in Compositae Dr. Edward Schilling University of Tennessee Tennessee – not Texas, but we still grow them big! [email protected] Ayres Hall – University of Tennessee campus in Knoxville, Tennessee University of Tennessee Leucanthemum vulgare – Inspiration for school colors (“Big Orange”) Compositae – Hybrids Abound! Changing view of hybridization: once consider rare, now known to be common in some groups Hotspots (Ellstrand et al. 1996. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 93: 5090-5093) Comparison of 5 floras (British Isles, Scandanavia, Great Plains, Intermountain, Hawaii): Asteraceae only family in top 6 in all 5 Helianthus x multiflorus Overview of Presentation – Selected Aspects of Hybridization 1. More rather than less – an example from the flower garden 2. Allopolyploidy – a changing view 3. Temporal diversity – Eupatorium (thoroughworts) 4. Hybrid speciation/lineages – Liatrinae (blazing stars) 5. Complications for phylogeny estimation – Helianthinae (sunflowers) Hybrid: offspring between two genetically different organisms Evolutionary Biology: usually used to designated offspring between different species “Interspecific Hybrid” “Species” – problematic term, so some authors include a description of their species concept in their definition of “hybrid”: Recognition of Hybrids: 1. Morphological “intermediacy” Actually – mixture of discrete parental traits + intermediacy for quantitative ones In practice: often a hybrid will also exhibit traits not present in either parent, transgressive Recognition of Hybrids: 1. Morphological “intermediacy” Actually – mixture of discrete parental traits + intermediacy for quantitative ones In practice: often a hybrid will also exhibit traits not present in either parent, transgressive 2. Genetic “additivity” Presence of genes from each parent Recognition of Hybrids: 1. Morphological “intermediacy” Actually – mixture of discrete parental traits + intermediacy for quantitative ones In practice: often a hybrid will also exhibit traits not present in either parent, transgressive 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Energy - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Solar energy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_energy From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Solar energy, radiant light and heat from the sun, has been harnessed by humans since ancient times using a range of ever-evolving technologies. Solar energy technologies include solar heating, solar photovoltaics, solar thermal electricity and solar architecture, which can make considerable contributions to solving some of the most urgent problems the world now faces.[1] Solar technologies are broadly characterized as either passive solar or active solar depending on the way they capture, convert and distribute solar energy. Active solar techniques include the use of photovoltaic panels and solar thermal collectors to harness the energy. Passive solar Nellis Solar Power Plant in the United States, one of techniques include orienting a building to the Sun, selecting the largest photovoltaic power plants in North materials with favorable thermal mass or light dispersing properties, and designing spaces that naturally circulate air. America. In 2011, the International Energy Agency said that "the development of affordable, Renewable energy inexhaustible and clean solar energy technologies will have huge longer-term benefits. It will increase countries’ energy security through reliance on an indigenous, inexhaustible and mostly import-independent resource, enhance sustainability, reduce pollution, lower the costs of mitigating climate change, and keep fossil fuel prices lower than otherwise. These advantages are
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to Protect the Monarch Butterfly (Danaus Plexippus Plexippus) Under the Endangered Species Act
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR © Jeffrey E. Belth PETITION TO PROTECT THE MONARCH BUTTERFLY (DANAUS PLEXIPPUS PLEXIPPUS) UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Notice of Petition Sally Jewell, Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Dan Ashe, Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Douglas Krofta, Chief Branch of Listing, Endangered Species Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 420 Arlington, VA 22203 [email protected] Monarch ESA Petition 2 PETITIONERS The Center for Biological Diversity (“Center”) is a nonprofit, public interest environmental organization dedicated to the protection of imperiled species and the habitat and climate they need to survive through science, policy, law, and creative media. The Center is supported by more than 775,000 members and activists throughout the country. The Center works to secure a future for all species, great or small, hovering on the brink of extinction. The Center for Food Safety (“CFS”) is a nonprofit public interest organization established in 1997 whose mission centers on protecting public health and the environment by curbing the adverse impacts of industrial agriculture and food production systems on public health, the environment, and animal welfare, and by instead promoting sustainable forms of agriculture. As particularly relevant here, CFS is the leading nonprofit working on the adverse impacts of genetically engineered crops and neonicotinoid pesticides. CFS and its over half-a-million members are concerned about the impacts of industrial agriculture on biodiversity generally, and on monarch butterflies specifically.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in Extreme Environments
    insight review articles Life in extreme environments Lynn J. Rothschild & Rocco L. Mancinelli NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035-1000, USA (e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]) Each recent report of liquid water existing elsewhere in the Solar System has reverberated through the international press and excited the imagination of humankind. Why? Because in the past few decades we have come to realize that where there is liquid water on Earth, virtually no matter what the physical conditions, there is life. What we previously thought of as insurmountable physical and chemical barriers to life, we now see as yet another niche harbouring ‘extremophiles’. This realization, coupled with new data on the survival of microbes in the space environment and modelling of the potential for transfer of life between celestial bodies, suggests that life could be more common than previously thought. Here we examine critically what it means to be an extremophile, and the implications of this for evolution, biotechnology and especially the search for life in the Universe. ormal is passé; extreme is chic. While thriving in biological extremes (for example, nutritional Aristotle cautioned “everything in extremes, and extremes of population density, parasites, moderation”, the Romans, known for their prey, and so on). excesses, coined the word ‘extremus’, the ‘Extremophile’ conjures up images of prokaryotes, yet the superlative of exter (‘being on the outside’). taxonomic range spans all three domains. Although all NBy the fifteenth century ‘extreme’ had arrived, via Middle hyperthermophiles are members of the Archaea and French, to English. At the dawning of the twenty-first Bacteria, eukaryotes are common among the psychrophiles, century we know that the Solar System, and even Earth, acidophiles, alkaliphiles, piezophiles, xerophiles and contain environmental extremes unimaginable to the halophiles (which respectively thrive at low temperatures, low ‘ancients’ of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • The History and Eponymy of the Common Name Joe-Pye-Weed for Eutrochium Species (Asteraceae)
    2017 THE GREAT LAKES BOTANIST 177 JOE PYE, JOE PYE’S LAW, AND JOE-PYE-WEED: THE HISTORY AND EPONYMY OF THE COMMON NAME JOE-PYE-WEED FOR EUTROCHIUM SPECIES (ASTERACEAE) Richard B. Pearce James S. Pringle 1025½ 4th Street Royal Botanical Gardens Galena, Illinois 61036-2609, U.S.A. P.O. Box 399 [email protected] Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3H8 [email protected] ABSTRACT Published accounts have differed greatly with regard to the origin of the common name Joe-Pye- weed, which is applied to Eutrochium spp. (Asteraceae: Eupatorieae). Discrepancies have long ex - isted as to the race of the man for whom Joe-Pye-weed was named, the century and the part of the country in which he lived, and even whether the plant name was derived from the name of any per - son, real or fictional. Our investigation has indicated that this plant name is from the cognomen of Joseph Shauquethqueat, an 18th- and early 19th-century Mohican sachem, who lived successively in the Mohican communities at Stockbridge, Massachusetts, and New Stockbridge, New York. KEYwORDS : Eutrochium, common name, Joe-Pye-weed, Shauquethqueat INTRODUCTION The common name Joe-Pye-weed is applied collectively to a group of closely related North American species in the family Asteraceae, tribe Eupatorieae, his - torically included in Eupatorium L. but now generally segregated as Eutrochium Raf. , following studies by Schilling et al. (1999) and Lamont (2004). Several other vernacular names have been applied to these plants in the past, but, as noted by Borland (1964), the name Joe-Pye-weed is the only one that remains in common use.
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Longevity and Dormancy State in a Disturbance-Dependent Forest Herb, Ageratina Altissima
    Seed Science Research (2016) 26, 148–152 doi:10.1017/S0960258516000052 © Cambridge University Press 2016 Seed longevity and dormancy state in a disturbance-dependent forest herb, Ageratina altissima Mame E. Redwood1, Glenn R. Matlack1* and Cynthia D. Huebner2 1Environmental and Plant Biology, Porter Hall, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA; 2Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA (Received 2 October 2015; accepted after revision 9 February 2016; first published online 10 March 2016) Abstract organisms to persist in heterogeneous, dynamic land- scapes (Venable and Brown, 1988). The guild of gap- Does seed dormancy allow disturbance-oriented forest dependent forest herbs allows a test of this hypothesis. herbs such as Ageratina altissima to persist in heteroge- Whereas most temperate-zone forest herb species show neous natural communities? To document seed longev- little seed dormancy and only occasionally appear in ity and dormancy state, Ageratina seeds were buried the soil seed bank (Matlack and Good, 1990; Hyatt in nylon mesh bags in second-growth forest stands in and Casper, 2000; Leckie et al., 2000), a subset of forest south-eastern Ohio, USA. Bags were recovered at herbs does appear in seed banks. These species are 2-month intervals, and seeds were tested for viability generally recognizable by their low tolerance of and germinability in the lab. Live seed numbers shade, small seeds, effective dispersal and opportunis- declined rapidly, with seed banks exhausted in an esti- tic use of forest gaps (Jankowska-Blaszczuk and – mated 33 37 months. Seeds showed a strong dor- Grubb, 1997; Hyatt and Casper, 2000). Canopy gaps – mancy polymorphism, with 71 84% of live seeds are isolated and ephemeral microhabitats, placing germinable between March and July, the season of severe limitations on the life histories of light- natural seedling emergence.
    [Show full text]