DOCSLIB.ORG

Southwest Multi-State Rail Planning Study Technical Background Report September 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southwest Multi-State Rail Planning Study Technical Background Report September 2014 Southwest Multi-State Rail Planning Study Technical Background Report September 2014 Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 What is a Multi-State Rail Plan? ................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Why the Southwest?.................................................................................................................................. 8 1.4 Geographic Scope of Study ........................................................................................................................ 9 1.5 Study Stakeholders .................................................................................................................................. 10 1.6 Guiding Principles for Southwest Multi-State Rail Network Planning ..................................................... 11 Chapter 2. Planning Context ................................................................................................................................. 12 2.1 Overview of the Study Area ..................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Population and Travel Demand ............................................................................................................... 15 2.3 Economic Activity..................................................................................................................................... 18 Chapter 3. The Multi-State Transportation System .............................................................................................. 21 3.1 Rail Network ............................................................................................................................................ 21 3.2 Air Network .............................................................................................................................................. 34 3.3 Highway Network .................................................................................................................................... 41 3.4 Intercity Bus ............................................................................................................................................. 47 3.5 Local Transit Systems ............................................................................................................................... 48 3.6 Ports ......................................................................................................................................................... 50 Chapter 4. Corridor Profiles .................................................................................................................................. 53 4.1 Corridor Identification Process ................................................................................................................ 53 4.2 Corridors Analyzed ................................................................................................................................... 53 Chapter 5. The Multi-State Preliminary Network Vision ...................................................................................... 76 5.1 Analysis Methods and the Network Planning Tool .................................................................................. 76 5.2 Preliminary Multi-State Network............................................................................................................. 80 5.3 Preliminary Multi-State Network Performance ....................................................................................... 84 Chapter 6. Governance ......................................................................................................................................... 86 6.1 Study Approach to Governance and Institutional Considerations .......................................................... 86 6.2 Areas of Need for Multi-State Coordination ........................................................................................... 87 6.3 Challenges to Multi-State Coordination .................................................................................................. 87 6.4 Alternative Governance Structures Considered ...................................................................................... 88 6.5 Governance Findings and Recommendations ......................................................................................... 92 Chapter 7. Next Steps ........................................................................................................................................... 95 ii | Technical Background Report Appendices Appendix A. List of MSAs in the Extended SW Study Area Appendix B. SW Study Area Population Appendix C. Rail and Highway Projects List Appendix D. Economic Characteristics of Major MSAs in the Study Region Appendix E. Summary of Transit Services in Selected MSAs Appendix F. Corridor Projected Growth Trends and Network Analysis Assumptions Appendix G. CONNECT SW Global Variable Inputs Appendix H. Corridor Performance Appendix I. Multi-State Governance Models Figures Figure 1 Southwest Study Area and Extended Study Area ..................................................................................... 9 Figure 2 Stakeholder involvement milestones ..................................................................................................... 11 Figure 3 Significant land uses in the SW Study Area ............................................................................................ 14 Figure 4 Forecast population growth between 2010 and 2050 in the SW Study Area ........................................ 15 Figure 5 Population distribution in the SW Study Area ........................................................................................ 15 Figure 6 Population density .................................................................................................................................. 16 Figure 7 Current (2010) intercity mode shares between MSAs in the Southwest Network ................................ 17 Figure 8 Total trips between selected MSAs ........................................................................................................ 18 Figure 9 Rail network ............................................................................................................................................ 22 Figure 10 Freight density map .............................................................................................................................. 24 Figure 11 Planned rail improvement projects ...................................................................................................... 29 Figure 12 Annual enplanements ........................................................................................................................... 35 Figure 13 Top 10 air travel markets less than 600 miles ...................................................................................... 36 Figure 14 Top 10 air/rail travel markets less than 600 miles ............................................................................... 36 Figure 15 Percent of flights delayed at 29 major airports .................................................................................... 37 Figure 16 FACT 2 airport capacity needs .............................................................................................................. 39 Figure 17 Highway network .................................................................................................................................. 43 Figure 18 Planned highway capacity projects ...................................................................................................... 46 Figure 19 Amtrak Thruway service in the Southwest ........................................................................................... 47 Figure 20 Transbay Transit Center rendering ....................................................................................................... 49 Figure 21 ARTIC Intermodal Center rendering ..................................................................................................... 50 Figure 22 Top ten ports in the SW Study Area by import/export value ............................................................... 51 Figure 23 San Diego–S.F./Oakland existing mode share and travel times ........................................................... 54 Figure 24 San Diego–S.F./Oakland corridor characteristics ................................................................................. 55 Figure 25 Greater Los Angeles–Las Vegas existing mode share and travel times ................................................ 56 Figure 26 Greater Los Angeles–Las Vegas corridor characteristics ...................................................................... 57 Figure 27 Greater Los Angeles-Phoenix existing modes share and travel times ................................................. 58 Figure 28 Greater Los Angeles-Phoenix corridor characteristics ......................................................................... 59 Figure 29 San Diego–Phoenix existing mode share and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Use F-Response Cloud Connector to Access Google Drive Cloud Storage
    F-Response Mission Guide Email:[email protected] Using the F-Response Cloud Connector with Google Drive Website:www.f-response.com Rev 1.0 Phone: 1-800-317-5497 Your Mission: Use F-Response Cloud Connector to access Google Drive Cloud Storage Note: This guide assumes you have installed F-Response TACTICAL, Consultant, Consultant + Covert, or Enterprise, your F-Response licensing dongle is plugged into your analyst machine, and the F-Response Cloud Connector (FCLDC) has been started. For more information, please reference the F-Response User Manual. Step 1: Open Google Drive Credential Configuration window Before you can connect to Google Drive you must first input valid credentials. In the F-Response Cloud Storage Connector go to File->Configure Credentials-> Configure Google Drive Credentials. Cloud Storage Connector Step 2: Open URL or Copy to Clipboard The first step in obtaining access to the Google Drive account is to request access either via the browser directly, or if you do not have access to the account in question, copying the request URL to the clipboard to be shared with the account holder via email, IM, etc. Regardless of the method chosen, the web browser user will be asked to login to Google Drive and authorize the F- Response Cloud Connector, upon completion they will be redirected to the F-Response website where an Authorization code will be presented. This is the Google Drive Authorization Code and must be inputed into the dialog box as indicated: F-Response Mission Guide Email:[email protected] Using the F-Response Cloud Connector with Google Drive Website:www.f-response.com Rev 1.0 Phone: 1-800-317-5497 Press Validate Access and the dialog will now present the User Account name, UID, and additional details in the Confirm Account section.
    [Show full text]
  • Jational Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form
    •m No. 10-300 REV. (9/77) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE JATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS >_____ NAME HISTORIC BROADWAY THEATER AND COMMERCIAL DISTRICT________________________ AND/OR COMMON LOCATION STREET & NUMBER <f' 300-8^9 ^tttff Broadway —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Los Angeles VICINITY OF 25 STATE CODE COUNTY CODE California 06 Los Angeles 037 | CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE X.DISTRICT —PUBLIC ^.OCCUPIED _ AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED .^COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE .XBOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE ^ENTERTAINMENT _ REUGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS 2L.YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY —OTHER: NAME Multiple Ownership (see list) STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE VICINITY OF | LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDSETC. Los Angeie s County Hall of Records STREET & NUMBER 320 West Temple Street CITY. TOWN STATE Los Angeles California ! REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TiTLE California Historic Resources Inventory DATE July 1977 —FEDERAL ^JSTATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS office of Historic Preservation CITY, TOWN STATE . ,. Los Angeles California DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED ^ORIGINAL SITE X.GOOD 0 —RUINS X_ALTERED _MOVED DATE- —FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Broadway Theater and Commercial District is a six-block complex of predominately commercial and entertainment structures done in a variety of architectural styles. The district extends along both sides of Broadway from Third to Ninth Streets and exhibits a number of structures in varying condition and degree of alteration.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Bus and Metro Rail System
    Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Metro Bus Lines East/West Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays North/South Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Limited Stop Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Special Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Approximate frequency in minutes Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Weekdays Saturdays Sundays 102 Walnut Park-Florence-East Jefferson Bl- 200 Alvarado St 5-8 11 12-30 10 12-30 12 12-30 302 Sunset Bl Limited 6-20—————— 603 Rampart Bl-Hoover St-Allesandro St- Local Service To/From Downtown LA 29-4038-4531-4545454545 10-12123020-303020-3030 Exposition Bl-Coliseum St 201 Silverlake Bl-Atwater-Glendale 40 40 40 60 60a 60 60a 305 Crosstown Bus:UCLA/Westwood- Colorado St Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve 3045-60————— NEWHALL 105 202 Imperial/Wilmington Station Limited 605 SANTA CLARITA 2 Sunset Bl 3-8 9-10 15-30 12-14 15-30 15-25 20-30 Vernon Av-La Cienega Bl 15-18 18-20 20-60 15 20-60 20 40-60 Willowbrook-Compton-Wilmington 30-60 — 60* — 60* — —60* Grande Vista Av-Boyle Heights- 5 10 15-20 30a 30 30a 30 30a PRINCESSA 4 Santa Monica Bl 7-14 8-14 15-18 12-18 12-15 15-30 15 108 Marina del Rey-Slauson Av-Pico Rivera 4-8 15 18-60 14-17 18-60 15-20 25-60 204 Vermont Av 6-10 10-15 20-30 15-20 15-30 12-15 15-30 312 La Brea
    [Show full text]
  • 40Thanniv Ersary
    Spring 2011 • $7 95 FSharing tihe exr periencste of Fastest railways past and present & rsary nive 40th An Things Were Not the Same after May 1, 1971 by George E. Kanary D-Day for Amtrak 5We certainly did not see Turboliners in regular service in Chicago before Amtrak. This train is In mid April, 1971, I was returning from headed for St. Louis in August 1977. —All photos by the author except as noted Seattle, Washington on my favorite train to the Pacific Northwest, the NORTH back into freight service or retire. The what I considered to be an inauspicious COAST LIMITED. For nearly 70 years, friendly stewardess-nurses would find other beginning to the new service. Even the the flagship train of the Northern Pacific employment. The locomotives and cars new name, AMTRAK, was a disappoint - RR, one of the oldest named trains in the would go into the AMTRAK fleet and be ment to me, since I preferred the classier country, had closely followed the route of dispersed country wide, some even winding sounding RAILPAX, which was eliminat - the Lewis and Clark Expedition of 1804, up running on the other side of the river on ed at nearly the last moment. and was definitely the super scenic way to the Milwaukee Road to the Twin Cities. In addition, wasn’t AMTRAK really Seattle and Portland. My first association That was only one example of the serv - being brought into existence to eliminate with the North Coast Limited dated to ices that would be lost with the advent of the passenger train in America? Didn’t 1948, when I took my first long distance AMTRAK on May 1, 1971.
    [Show full text]
  • The Signal Bridge
    THE SIGNAL BRIDGE Volume 18 NEWSLETTER OF THE MOUNTAIN EMPIRE MODEL RAILROADERS CLUB Number 5B MAY 2011 BONUS PAGES Published for the Education and Information of Its Membership NORFOLK & WESTERN/SOUTHERN RAILWAY DEPOT BRISTOL TENNESSEE/VIRGINIA CLUB OFFICERS LOCATION HOURS President: Secretary: Newsletter Editor: ETSU Campus, Business Meetings are held the Fred Alsop Donald Ramey Ted Bleck-Doran: George L. Carter 3rd Tuesday of each month. Railroad Museum Meetings start at 7:00 PM at Vice-President: Treasurer: Webmaster: ETSU Campus, Johnson City, TN. John Carter Duane Swank John Edwards Brown Hall Science Bldg, Room 312, Open House for viewing every Saturday from 10:00 am until 3:00 pm. Work Nights each Thursday from 5:00 pm until ?? APRIL 2011 THE SIGNAL BRIDGE Page 2 APRIL 2011 THE SIGNAL BRIDGE Page 3 APRIL 2011 THE SIGNAL BRIDGE II scheme. The "stripe" style paint schemes would be used on AMTRAK PAINT SCHEMES Amtrak for many more years. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Phase II Amtrak paint schemes or "Phases" (referred to by Amtrak), are a series of livery applied to the outside of their rolling stock in the United States. The livery phases appeared as different designs, with a majority using a red, white, and blue (the colors of the American flag) format, except for promotional trains, state partnership routes, and the Acela "splotches" phase. The first Amtrak Phases started to emerge around 1972, shortly after Amtrak's formation. Phase paint schemes Phase I F40PH in Phase II Livery Phase II was one of the first paint schemes of Amtrak to use entirely the "stripe" style.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Rail Service the Vermont Way
    DRAFT Regional Rail Service The Vermont Way Authored by Christopher Parker and Carl Fowler November 30, 2017 Contents Contents 2 Executive Summary 4 The Budd Car RDC Advantage 5 Project System Description 6 Routes 6 Schedule 7 Major Employers and Markets 8 Commuter vs. Intercity Designation 10 Project Developer 10 Stakeholders 10 Transportation organizations 10 Town and City Governments 11 Colleges and Universities 11 Resorts 11 Host Railroads 11 Vermont Rail Systems 11 New England Central Railroad 12 Amtrak 12 Possible contract operators 12 Dispatching 13 Liability Insurance 13 Tracks and Right-of-Way 15 Upgraded Track 15 Safety: Grade Crossing Upgrades 15 Proposed Standard 16 Upgrades by segment 16 Cost of Upgrades 17 Safety 19 Platforms and Stations 20 Proposed Stations 20 Existing Stations 22 Construction Methods of New Stations 22 Current and Historical Precedents 25 Rail in Vermont 25 Regional Rail Service in the United States 27 New Mexico 27 Maine 27 Oregon 28 Arizona and Rural New York 28 Rural Massachusetts 28 Executive Summary For more than twenty years various studies have responded to a yearning in Vermont for a regional passenger rail service which would connect Vermont towns and cities. This White Paper, commissioned by Champ P3, LLC reviews the opportunities for and obstacles to delivering rail service at a rural scale appropriate for a rural state. Champ P3 is a mission driven public-private partnership modeled on the Eagle P3 which built Denver’s new commuter rail network. Vermont’s two railroads, Vermont Rail System and Genesee & Wyoming, have experience hosting and operating commuter rail service utilizing Budd cars.
    [Show full text]
  • 11-07-19-Board-Packet-1.Pdf
    Long Beach Transit welcomes you to this meeting and invites you to participate in matters before the Board. Information and Procedures Concerning Conduct at Board of Directors’ Meetings PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: All members of the public may address the Board on any Special presentations which include slides, video, etc., item listed on the agenda. during the course of a meeting will only be allowed when All members of the public may address the Board on non- requested of the Board Secretary eight days in advance of agenda items from “Business From The Floor.” the meeting, which will require prior approval from the Chair. Each speaker will be asked to complete a Speaker Card and turn it in to the Board Secretary prior to the conclusion BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR: of the staff presentation and will state his/her name at the podium before speaking. A member of the general public may address the Board on any matter not appearing on the agenda that is of interest Persons demonstrating rude, bois- to such person and within the jurisdiction of the terous or profane behavior will be Board. called to order by the Chair. If such conduct continues, the Chair may No action can be taken by the Board on any call a recess, requesting the removal The Board of Directors items brought forward at this time. The Board of such person(s) from the Council and Staff shall work to may request this item be brought back at a Chamber, adjourn the meeting or subsequent meeting. take some other appropriate action.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Report FY19 Rider Profile CAPITOL Corridorticket JOINT Type POWERS AUTHORITY WORK/ BUSINESS 67%
    Performance Report FY19 Rider Profile CAPITOL CORRIDORTicket JOINT Type POWERS AUTHORITY WORK/ BUSINESS 67% Ticket WithWelcome FY2019, the Capitol Corridor Aboard! celebrated five straight years of Type record-breaking ridership and revenue, with a new all-time high of 10-RIDE 1,777,136 riders and $38.03 million in revenue. ThisWORK/ growth is reflected 18% FAMILY/ BUSINESS OTHER 1% 67% REC/in the FareboxFRIENDS Ratio, which reached a previously unattained 60%. SCHOOL 3% LEISURE 15% 12% ROUND-TRIP/ To build upon this success, and to ensure the Capitol Corridor’s place as ONE-WAY a premier travel choice, the CCJPA is making progress on infrastructure 50% improvements, safety upgrades, customer service enhancements, MONTHLY and service expansion projects. These efforts aim to maintain Capitol 32% Corridor as a quality, convenient,OTHER 1% cost-effective, and flexibleFAMILY/ option for REC/ FRIENDS years to come. SCHOOL 3% LEISURE 15% Rider Profile Ticket Type 12% SHOP/VACATION 2% WORK/ BUSINESS 21 Years of Improvement* 67% SERVICE REVENUE-TO- LEVEL RIDERSHIP REVENUE COST RATIO +275% +284% +508% +100% Rider Customer Satisfaction Profile 10-RIDE WORK/ 18% FAMILY/ BUSINESS OTHER 1% 67% FY 2019 FY 2019 FY 2019 REC/ FYFRIENDS 2019 30 DAILY 1,777,136SCHOOL 3% $38.03MLEISURE 60%15% TRAINS 12% ROUND-TRIP/ ONE-WAY 50% MONTHLY 90% 87% 90% 91% 89% 89% 87% 89% 88% 85% 90% 32% OTHER 1% FAMILY/ FY 1998 REC/ FRIENDS 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 SCHOOL 3% 2018 2019 (PRE-CCJPA) FY 1998 FY 1998 FY 1998 LEISURE 15% 8 DAILY (PRE-CCJPA) (PRE-CCJPA) (PRE-CCJPA) SHOP/VACATION 2% 12% TRAINS 463,000 $6.25M 30% *CCJPA assumed management of the service in 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preservation Plan for the Fred Harvey Houses
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2010 Branding the Southwest: A Preservation Plan for the Fred Harvey Houses Patrick W. Kidd University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Kidd, Patrick W., "Branding the Southwest: A Preservation Plan for the Fred Harvey Houses" (2010). Theses (Historic Preservation). 144. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/144 Suggested Citation: Kidd, Patrick W. (2010) "Branding the Southwest: A Preservation Plan for the Fred Harvey Houses." (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/144 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Branding the Southwest: A Preservation Plan for the Fred Harvey Houses Keywords Historic Preservation; Southwest, Railroad Disciplines Architecture | Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Suggested Citation: Kidd, Patrick W. (2010) "Branding the Southwest: A Preservation Plan for the Fred Harvey Houses." (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/144 BRANDING THE SOUTHWEST: A PRESERVATION PLAN FOR THE FRED HARVEY HOUSES Patrick W. Kidd A Thesis in Historic Preservation Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Master of Science in Historic Preservation 2010 ____________________________ Advisor Dr. Aaron V. Wunsch, PhD Lecturer in Architectural History ____________________________ Program Chair Dr. Randall F. Mason, PhD Associate Professor This work is dedicated to all those who strive to preserve and promote our rich rail heritage and to make it available to future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Surfliner® Trains Coaches: Unreserved
    PACIFIC SURFLINER® MAY 10, 2010 And Effective CALIFORNIA COASTAL SERVICES SM Enjoy the journey. PACIFIC SURFLINER® serving SAN LUIS OBISPO - SANTA BARBARA LOS ANGELES - ORANGE COUNTY 1-800-USA-RAIL SAN DIEGO Call CALIFORNIA COASTAL SERVICES serving ROSEVILLE - SACRAMENTO OAKLAND - SAN LUIS OBISPO SANTA BARBARA - LOS ANGELES - SAN DIEGO And intermediate stations AMTRAK.COM Visit NRPC Form W31–600M–5/10/10 Stock #02-3312 PACIFIC SURFLINER-Northbound San Diego • Orange County • Los Angeles • Santa Barbara • San Luis Obispo Train Number 5801 799 763 565 567 769 571 573 775 577 579 583 785 587 589 591 595 597 5811 Normal Days of Operation Daily Daily Daily Daily Mo-Fr Daily SaSu Mo-Fr Daily SaSu Mo-Fr Daily Daily SaSu Mo-Fr SaSu Daily FrSu Daily Will Also Operate 5/31,9/6 5/31,9/6 5/31,9/6 5/31,9/6 5/31,9/6 Will Not Operate 5/31,9/6 5/31,9/6 5/31,9/6 5/31,9/6 On Board Service ® B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y Mile Symbol San Diego, CA (Tijuana ) (PT) 0 Dp 6 10A 7 05A 8 10A 9 30A 10 35A 10 50A 12 00N 12 55P 1 25P 3 00P 4 00P 5 20P 5 55P 6 20P 8 20P 9 15P 210 00P San Diego, CA -Old Town 3 %§R 4 06P %§R 5 27P %§R 6 27P Solana Beach, CA 26 6 45A 7 39A 8 44A 10 04A 11 09A 11 24A 12 34P 1 29P 1 59P 3 34P 4 35P 5 56P 6 29P 6 56P 8 54P 9 49P 210 30P Oceanside, CA (LEGOLAND) %∞ 41 7 01A 7 55A 8 58A 10 18A 11 25A 11 39A 12 49P 1 44P 2 14P 3 50P 4 52P 6 10P 6 44P 7 10P 9 09P 10 04P 211 00P San Clemente Pier, CA 63 4 11P 5 15P San Juan Capistrano, CA 70 7 31A 8 28A 9 29A 10
    [Show full text]
  • Great Passenger Trains
    SOUTHERN PACIFIC PASSENGER TRAINS Dcdication 1.tt, tt/!nt tr. tr.,....,,, t.\1,:1.r., 1,',.\ll{l I'1,.. Orrhe6rcl(cndpipt^: \/r'.r" l']t tti,\ ),,n\,tt "l " ,,,.,r'-ll ..\'' !l''.\l\ tr't.; s e,R n,t 7'\lin rl,l;n'rt uri'trtrn I'ri rrt''' i i J.l {' L\rtrlror Lrb^ t|, tt! Ln \Lt.' r"n\, ]'// r 1.rP sfi " Bnct covea main: r,rl{/ /rrr. s,t ) | u 1)i n; }'t1') i I I t t nrn ) qt t $ttr l,\li.{}! t'ta t" Wirf nrr.r!rlnD..J Llu!,n!lrrrcl,)i*r!s J;r rhr I),\11!ht l.llq!l ,rt,l' ',1 1l', t.tt, ltit rll .\ll rish. ,c{1.(l /i'' n'r,,,,, ,, '| ,| h: s;".;--h R.tti" K, .tt tt: , t;lht nt|lttt, tht nr\'] tith"! Rlr.t &t 1)rrru (;r/r,d; Ilrnn SrJ'irnl srli ,t r"r,',, !rtr\,' t , rl lll'lrl r fit.iD nlI nFcr: ri 7ri7. J'a/ t.ru li;lit r\,l|lt' rh,t\'r't o l. 'lr . Bi.Lcovcr, 'r' ' \n r t Li u t' l b rt r t\, r t't' rt lnr\vl(lsr '\llr(nn nh.o.' r. nrklr..rNrtr rnrA!'ril" 'ri lh ti! n, tl,r',l i'rr " oi rtn,pl trt ,'\trnrtr nn[1ni l.' ."1,'."J .'lr', ""r' r,tt/,r ! r t j r,- r,, ,,,, t.. ,. .t .t Krl,L'run, 'll,i. ml,li..ti,", hA n,n lJ.c.
    [Show full text]