DOCSLIB.ORG

Coast-Daylight

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coast-Daylight MAY 2013 Coast Corridor SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PLAN The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California or the Federal Railroad Administration. This publication does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. FINAL SUBMITTAL May 2013 SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Coast Corridor Prepared for Prepared by California Department of Transportation AECOM 1120 N Street 2101 Webster Street #1900 P.O. Box 942874 Oakland, CA 94612 Sacramento, CA 95814 with Cambridge Systematics & Arellano Associates [This page intentionally blank] Coast Corridor Service Development Plan May 2013 Contents 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1.1 Organization of the Coast Corridor SDP ................................................................................ 1-3 1.2 Relationship of the Coast Corridor SDP to Other Documents ................................................... 1-4 1.2.1 SDP Support for State Rail Plan ............................................................................................ 1-4 1.2.2 Integration with other SDPs ................................................................................................... 1-4 1.2.3 Relationship to Corridor Environmental Analyses .................................................................. 1-4 2.0 Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Purpose ...................................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.2 Need ........................................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.2.1 Corridor Transportation Market Challenges ........................................................................... 2-5 2.2.2 Source: Moody’s Economy.com, 2011. Corridor Transportation Market Opportunities ........ 2-6 2.2.3 Current and Forecasted Demand ........................................................................................... 2-7 2.2.4 Corridor Capacity Constraints ................................................................................................ 2-9 2.3 Scope and Objective of the Plan .............................................................................................. 2-10 2.3.1 Scope ................................................................................................................................... 2-10 2.3.2 Objectives ............................................................................................................................. 2-11 3.0 Rationale ........................................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Capacity Benefits ....................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.2 Multi-Modal System Benefits ...................................................................................................... 3-2 3.3 Operational Benefits ................................................................................................................... 3-2 4.0 Identification of Alternatives ........................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Previous Corridor Planning Studies ........................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Corridor Rail Service Plans .................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 Corridor Rail Service Improvements ...................................................................................... 4-2 4.2 No-Build Alternative ................................................................................................................... 4-3 4.3 Build Alternative ......................................................................................................................... 4-3 4.3.1 Long-Term (2020–2040) Improvements ................................................................................ 4-6 5.0 Evaluation of Alternatives ............................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Purpose and Need Criteria ......................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Technical Feasibility ................................................................................................................... 5-5 5.3 Economic Feasibility .................................................................................................................. 5-6 5.4 Environmental Resources and Quality ....................................................................................... 5-7 5.5 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 5-8 6.0 Planning Methodologies ................................................................................................................. 6-1 6.1 Planning Horizons ...................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1.1 Year 2020 (Near-Term) .......................................................................................................... 6-1 Page i Coast Corridor Service Development Plan May 2013 6.1.2 Year 2040 (Long-Term) .......................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Major Overall Assumptions ........................................................................................................ 6-1 6.2.1 Socioeconomic Data .............................................................................................................. 6-2 6.2.2 Forecasting Assumptions ....................................................................................................... 6-2 6.2.3 Freight Rail Forecasting Methodology ................................................................................... 6-4 6.2.4 Market Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 6-6 6.2.5 GIS Methodology ................................................................................................................... 6-7 6.2.6 Alternatives Analysis Methodology ........................................................................................ 6-8 7.0 Outreach Efforts ............................................................................................................................. 7-1 7.1 Stakeholder Meetings ................................................................................................................ 7-1 7.1.1 California State Rail Plan Advisory Committee ...................................................................... 7-1 7.1.2 State Agencies/Regional Agencies ........................................................................................ 7-2 7.1.3 SDP Rail Corridor Committees and Railroads ....................................................................... 7-3 7.2 Public Meetings .......................................................................................................................... 7-4 8.0 Ridership Demand and Revenue Forecast .................................................................................... 8-1 8.1 Passenger Rail Forecast ............................................................................................................ 8-1 8.1.1 Methodology and Approach ................................................................................................... 8-1 8.1.2 Study Area Definition ............................................................................................................. 8-1 8.1.3 Data Sources and Assumptions ............................................................................................. 8-2 8.1.4 Travel Demand Model ............................................................................................................ 8-3 8.1.5 Baseline and Future Scenarios Forecasted Ridership .......................................................... 8-4 8.2 Revenue Forecast ...................................................................................................................... 8-4 8.2.1 Ticket Revenue Forecast ....................................................................................................... 8-4 8.2.2 Auxiliary Revenue Forecast ................................................................................................... 8-5 9.0 Operations Modeling ...................................................................................................................... 9-1 9.1 Modeling Methodology ............................................................................................................... 9-2 9.1.1 Service Network
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Simi Valley General Plan Update Technical Background Report 5-1 Chapter 5 Circulation
    CHAPTER 5 Circulation 5.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter summarizes the existing transportation conditions in the planning area. The chapter addresses multi-modal transportation elements including conditions of the City’s local roadway system, transit system, bicycle paths, and goods movement infrastructure. The City of Simi Valley is served by various transportation facilities, including one regional freeway (State Route 118), one freight/commuter rail line, an extensive roadway network, and several bus transit lines. 5.2 EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM 5.2.1 Regional Access State Route 118 (SR-118) provides regional access to the City. The facility has three general purpose lanes in each direction and is currently being widened from six to eight lanes, from Tapo Canyon Road to the Los Angeles County line. The freeway carries between 80,000 and 135,000 daily trips in Simi Valley, generally increasing from west to east. There are eight full-access interchanges on SR-118 within the City. These interchanges are Madera Road; First Street; Erringer Road; Sycamore Drive; Tapo Canyon Road; Stearns Street; Yosemite Avenue; and Kuehner Drive. 5.2.2 Functional Roadway Classifications The existing regional and local roadway network in Simi Valley is a hierarchical system of highways and local streets developed to provide regional traffic movement and local access. The following section provides a description of the functional classification of the facilities within the planning area. Figure 5-1 (Cross Sections) depicts typical cross sections for all of the roadway classifications. The street classifications for the major facilities in the planning area are shown on Figure 5-2 (Functional Street Classifications).
    [Show full text]
  • The Third Crossing
    The Third Crossing A Megaproject in a Megaregion www.thirdcrossing.org Final Report, February 2017 Transportation Planning Studio Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the Department of City and Regional Planning (DCRP) at the College of Environmental Design (CED) at UC Berkeley, the University of California Transportation Center and Institute of Transportation Studies (ITS), UC Berkeley for support. A special thanks also goes to the helpful feedback from studio instructor Karen Trapenberg Frick and UC Berkeley faculty and researchers including Jesus Barajas and Jason Corburn. We also acknowledge the tremendous support and insights from colleagues at numerous public agencies and non-profit organizations throughout California. A very special thanks goes to David Ory, Michael Reilly, and Fletcher Foti of MTC for their gracious support in running regional travel and land use models, and to Professor Paul Waddell and Sam Blanchard of UrbanSim, Inc. for lending their resources and expertise in land use modeling. We also thank our classmates Joseph Poirier and Lee Reis; as well as David Eifler, Teresa Caldeira, Jennifer Wolch, Robert Cervero, Elizabeth Deakin, Malla Hadley, Leslie Huang and other colleagues at CED; and, Alexandre Bayen, Laura Melendy and Jeanne Marie Acceturo of ITS Berkeley. About Us We are a team of 15 graduate students in City Planning, Transportation Engineering, and Public Health. This project aims to facilitate a conversation about the future of transportation between the East Bay and San Francisco and in the larger Northern California megaregion. We are part of the Department of City and Regional Planning in the UC Berkeley College of Environmental Design, with support from the University of California Transportation Center and The Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Santa Clara to Sacramento Schedule
    Amtrak Santa Clara To Sacramento Schedule Volatilisable and syzygial Tray interrupts some ginnels so devouringly! Vectorial Merry parbuckles some paramounts and complicating his weft so biannually! Crabwise Cletus discharging her burdens so piecemeal that Westleigh unsnap very unrighteously. The rancho cucamonga metrolink station to sacramento to violence in el paso robles amtrak instead of travel In sacramento to amtrak tips, schedules subject to find a scheduled departure times in. Amtrak can get engine to Sacramento from 165 cities including Los Angeles. Take a mortal at each route we propose that this trip. How business get from Santa Clara to Sacramento by warm or car. Street from santa clara amtrak staff in life for your help you see the schedule. The only even to know my cost for accommodations is negligent either lunar or stock on their website. Er 439 Der S Tue 1 ROL DE Subject all of bill SAN JOAQUIN. Trains on amtrak santa clara to sacramento schedule when i wonder whether this really matters to sacramento? Yosemite Lodge in Yosemite Valley. California to sacramento to clark street. The new Amtrak Viewliner roomettes do not have their own toilet. Track all important calendar dates the candidates and race results for the. California to sacramento, schedules and all scheduled departure times when you decide to get personal information and this? The santa clara and friday evening, eugene or to call is to log in. Metra passengers each week. The sudden death of amtrak santa clara to sacramento schedule on other? Was wondering if you often explain how me howit works when ticket buying for a bedroom.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations
    Pursuant to Section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-432, Division B): Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations Covering the Quarter Ended June, 2019 (Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2019) Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation Published August 2019 Table of Contents (Notes follow on the next page.) Financial Table 1 (A/B): Short-Term Avoidable Operating Costs (Note 1) Table 2 (A/B): Fully Allocated Operating Cost covered by Passenger-Related Revenue Table 3 (A/B): Long-Term Avoidable Operating Loss (Note 1) Table 4 (A/B): Adjusted Loss per Passenger- Mile Table 5: Passenger-Miles per Train-Mile On-Time Performance (Table 6) Test No. 1 Change in Effective Speed Test No. 2 Endpoint OTP Test No. 3 All-Stations OTP Train Delays Train Delays - Off NEC Table 7: Off-NEC Host Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Table 8: Off-NEC Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Train Delays - On NEC Table 9: On-NEC Total Host and Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Other Service Quality Table 10: Customer Satisfaction Indicator (eCSI) Scores Table 11: Service Interruptions per 10,000 Train-Miles due to Equipment-related Problems Table 12: Complaints Received Table 13: Food-related Complaints Table 14: Personnel-related Complaints Table 15: Equipment-related Complaints Table 16: Station-related Complaints Public Benefits (Table 17) Connectivity Measure Availability of Other Modes Reference Materials Table 18: Route Descriptions Terminology & Definitions Table 19: Delay Code Definitions Table 20: Host Railroad Code Definitions Appendixes A.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting
    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • Adding Passenger Service
    A Modeler’s Aid Clinic Passenger Operations Conducted By Bruce Knapp How to integrate Passenger Trains into your operating sessions or How the Santa Fe Operated Passenger Service Why Passenger Service? Period and Equipment 1830 to 1850 Revenue Wood cars - usually stage coach bodies Advertising 1850 to 1870 Show off your modeling skills Wood cars built for railroad use Introduce sleeping cars Add interest Introduce air brakes & knuckle couplers Visitors like passenger trains 1880 to 1900 Introduce dining cars You make Walthers and Rapido very happy Introduce steam heat You also make local hobby dealers happy Introduce electric lighting Introduce vestibules and diaphragms Two Typical Wood Cars Period and Equipment 1900 to 1930 steel cars become standard air conditioning introduced All-reserved “name trains” 1930 to 1970 streamlining introduced “passenger specific” color schemes common high speed steam and diesels introduced 1971 to Present Amtrak formed Types of Passenger Service Mixed Train Combine Premier Class [Named Trains] Normal Service [Named or numbered] Local Service [locomotive & cars] Local Service [single unit] Commuter Service Mail & Express Trains Mixed Train Service Fan Trip [especially steam] Famous “Name Trains” Assigned Locomotives Chief, El Capitan, Super Chief: ATSF Steam [1940’s to 1960’s] th 20 Century Limited, Ohio Limited: NYC First Class: 4-6-2, 4-6-4, 4-8-2, 4-8-4 Broadway Limited: PRR The Hummingbird: L&N Local Service: 4-4-2, 4-6-2, 4-6-4 City of Los Angeles, City of San Francisco: UP Mixed Train: 2-8-0, 4-6-0,
    [Show full text]
  • Nature of Incident: Start Smart Program Location: Camarillo Police Station 3701 E. Las Posas Road Camarillo, Ca. 93010] Date &Am
    Camarillo - Start Smart Program 1/28/2013 3:30:00 PM Nature of Incident: Start Smart Program Location: Camarillo Police Station 3701 E. Las Posas Road Camarillo, Ca. 93010] Date & Time: Thursday 21st @ 5:30 pm Unit Responsible: Camarillo Traffic Bureau Narrative: The Camarillo Police Department will be hosting a program to educate newly licensed and future drivers. The 'Start Smart' Program is a cooperative effort between the California Highway Patrol, Camarillo Police Department, teenage drivers, and their parents. In an attempt to remain proactive and not reactive, Start Smart is designed to help young drivers and their parents/guardians understand the responsibilities associated with driving a motor vehicle. Start Smart will show how a poor choice behind the wheel can change the lives of everyone involved. Our goal is to raise awareness and reduce the number of teen-related injuries and deaths due to collisions. Interested parents are asked to call Sergeant Renee Ferguson at 805-388-5132 for more information and for reservations call the Camarillo Police Department Community Resource Unit at 805-388-5155 to make a reservation. Space is limited to 20 students and their parents. There is no charge to attend the program. Deputy Preparing Media Deputy Robert Steele Release: Media Release Date: January 22, 2013 Follow-Up Contact: Sergeant Renee Ferguson (805) 388-5132 Approved by: Captain Bruce Macedo Ventura County Crime Stoppers will pay up to $1,000 reward for information, which leads to the arrest and criminal complaint against the person(s) responsible for this crime. The caller may remain anonymous. The call is not recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors M a R C H 1 3 , 2 0
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS MARCH 13, 2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY BOARD ROSTER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY County Member Alternate Orange: Shawn Nelson (Chair) Jeffrey Lalloway* Supervisor, 4th District Mayor Pro Tem, City of Irvine 2 votes County of Orange, Chairman OCTA Board, Chair OCTA Board Gregory T. Winterbottom Todd Spitzer* Public Member Supervisor, 3rd District OCTA Board County of Orange OCTA Board Riverside: Daryl Busch (Vice-Chair) Andrew Kotyuk* Mayor Council Member 2 votes City of Perris City of San Jacinto RCTC Board, Chair RCTC Board Karen Spiegel Debbie Franklin* Council Member Mayor City of Corona City of Banning RCTC Board RCTC Board Ventura: Keith Millhouse (2nd Vice-Chair) Brian Humphrey Mayor Pro Tem Citizen Representative 1 vote City of Moorpark VCTC Board VCTC Board Los Angeles: Michael Antonovich Robert T. Bartlett Supervisor, 5th District Metro Appointee 4 votes County of Los Angeles, Mayor Metro Board Don Knabe Richard Katz Supervisor, 4th District Metro Appointee County of Los Angeles Metro Board Paul Krekorian Borja Leon Councilmember, 2nd District Metro Appointee Metro Board Ara Najarian [currently awaiting appointment] Council Member City of Glendale Metro Board One Gateway Plaza, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90012 SCRRA Board of Directors Roster Page 2 San Bernardino: Larry McCallon James Ramos* Mayor Supervisor, 3rd District 2 votes City of Highland County of San Bernardino, Chair SANBAG Board SANBAG Board Paul Eaton Alan D. Wapner* Mayor Mayor Pro Tem City of Montclair City of Ontario SANBAG Board SANBAG Board EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS San Diego Association of Governments: [CURRENTLY AWAITING APPOINTMENT] Contact: Linda Culp Principal Planner – Rail Southern California Association of Governments: Art Brown Mayor, City of Buena Park State of California: Ryan Chamberlain Director, Caltrans District 12 Alternate: [CURRENTLY AWAITING APPOINTMENT] *Alternates represent either member Revised 02/27/15 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING FRIDAY, MARCH 13, 2015 – 10:00a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Passenger Trains
    SOUTHERN PACIFIC PASSENGER TRAINS Dcdication 1.tt, tt/!nt tr. tr.,....,,, t.\1,:1.r., 1,',.\ll{l I'1,.. Orrhe6rcl(cndpipt^: \/r'.r" l']t tti,\ ),,n\,tt "l " ,,,.,r'-ll ..\'' !l''.\l\ tr't.; s e,R n,t 7'\lin rl,l;n'rt uri'trtrn I'ri rrt''' i i J.l {' L\rtrlror Lrb^ t|, tt! Ln \Lt.' r"n\, ]'// r 1.rP sfi " Bnct covea main: r,rl{/ /rrr. s,t ) | u 1)i n; }'t1') i I I t t nrn ) qt t $ttr l,\li.{}! t'ta t" Wirf nrr.r!rlnD..J Llu!,n!lrrrcl,)i*r!s J;r rhr I),\11!ht l.llq!l ,rt,l' ',1 1l', t.tt, ltit rll .\ll rish. ,c{1.(l /i'' n'r,,,,, ,, '| ,| h: s;".;--h R.tti" K, .tt tt: , t;lht nt|lttt, tht nr\'] tith"! Rlr.t &t 1)rrru (;r/r,d; Ilrnn SrJ'irnl srli ,t r"r,',, !rtr\,' t , rl lll'lrl r fit.iD nlI nFcr: ri 7ri7. J'a/ t.ru li;lit r\,l|lt' rh,t\'r't o l. 'lr . Bi.Lcovcr, 'r' ' \n r t Li u t' l b rt r t\, r t't' rt lnr\vl(lsr '\llr(nn nh.o.' r. nrklr..rNrtr rnrA!'ril" 'ri lh ti! n, tl,r',l i'rr " oi rtn,pl trt ,'\trnrtr nn[1ni l.' ."1,'."J .'lr', ""r' r,tt/,r ! r t j r,- r,, ,,,, t.. ,. .t .t Krl,L'run, 'll,i. ml,li..ti,", hA n,n lJ.c.
    [Show full text]
  • Transbay Transit Center, San Francisco
    CITY OF LAGUNA NIGUEL GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN Transit-Oriented Development Case Studies Prepared for City of Laguna Niguel 27781 La Paz Road Laguna Niguel, California 92677 Prepared by PBS&J 12301 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 430 Los Angeles, California 90025 November 2007 Contents CASE STUDIES Introduction.................................................................................................................................1 CASE STUDY 1 Downtown Arlington Heights, Illinois......................................................................................3 CASE STUDY 2 Del Mar Station, Pasadena.....................................................................................................7 CASE STUDY 3 EmeryStation, Emeryville, CA............................................................................................... 11 CASE STUDY 4 North Hollywood Commercial Core ................................................................................... 17 CASE STUDY 5 Rail Station District, Santa Ana............................................................................................ 21 CASE STUDY 6 Grossmont Transit Station, La Mesa ................................................................................... 25 CASE STUDY 7 Pleasant Hill BART Transit Village ...................................................................................... 29 CASE STUDY 8 Rincon Hill Area Plan, San Francisco .................................................................................. 33 CASE STUDY 9 Transbay Transit
    [Show full text]
  • 5901 Christie Avenue | Emeryville, California
    5901 Christie Avenue | Emeryville, California FOR LEASE HOME HIGHLIGHTS FLOOR PLANS LOCATION Charlie Sweeney 555 12th Street, Suite 1400 +1 510 267 6021 Oakland, CA 94607 [email protected] main +1 510 465 8000 LIC #01987199 fax +1 510 465 1350 cushmanwakefield.com Cushman & Wakefield Copyright 2015. No warranty or representation, express or implied, is made to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and same is submitted subject to errors, omissions, change of price, rental or other conditions, withdrawal without notice, and to any special listing conditions imposed by the property owner(s). As applicable, we make no representation as to the condition of the property (or properties) in question. 5901 Christie Avenue Emeryville, CA HOME HIGHLIGHTS FLOOR PLANS LOCATION Property Highlights • Panoramic Bay Views • Mixture of Creative Office Space and Traditional Office Space • HVAC • Recent Interior and Exterior Improvements Amenities • Free on site parking • Freight and passenger elevators • Excellent Emeryville location, adjacent to the Public Market and walking distance to many restaurants, health & fitness facility and retail amenities • Immediate access to I-80/I-580 for convenient access to San Francisco, downtown Oakland and the East Bay thoroughfare • Property Management on-site • 24-7 Building Security and Tenant Access Available Suites Suite 208 | ±2,261 SF | $3.00 - $3.25 FSG 5901 Christie Avenue Emeryville, CA HOME HIGHLIGHTS FLOOR PLANS LOCATION 2nd Floor Plan Suite 208 | ±2,261 SF Highlights • 6 Private Offices • Large Conference Room • Kitchen Charlie Sweeney 555 12th Street, Suite 1400 +1 510 267 6021 Oakland, CA 94607 [email protected] main +1 510 465 8000 LIC #01987199 fax +1 510 465 1350 cushmanwakefield.com Cushman & Wakefield Copyright 2015.
    [Show full text]