DOCSLIB.ORG

Holmium Laser Versus Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Holmium Laser Versus Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate TAU0010.1177/1756287218779784Therapeutic Advances in UrologyGM Pirola, G Saredi 779784research-article2018 Therapeutic Advances in Urology Original Research Ther Adv Urol Holmium laser versus thulium laser 1 –11 DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287218779784 10.1177/ enucleation of the prostate: a matched- 1756287218779784https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287218779784 © The Author(s), 2018. Reprints and permissions: pair analysis from two centers http://www.sagepub.co.uk/ journalsPermissions.nav Giacomo Maria Pirola , Giovanni Saredi, Ricardo Codas Duarte, Lorraine Bernard, Andrea Pacchetti, Lorenzo Berti, Eugenio Martorana, Giulio Carcano, Lionel Badet and Hakim Fassi-Fehri Abstract Background: The aim of our study was to compare perioperative and functional outcomes of two different prostatic laser enucleation techniques performed in two high-volume centers: 100 W holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) (Lyon, France) and 110 W thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) (Varese, Italy). Materials and Methods: A nonrandomized, observational, retrospective and matched-pair analysis was performed on two homogeneous groups of 117 patients that underwent prostate laser enucleation in the HoLEP or ThuLEP centers between January 2015 and April 2017, following the classical ‘three lobes’ enucleation technique. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and prostate volume were the main parameters considered for matching the patients between the two groups. Patients on anticoagulant therapy, with documented detrusor hypoactivity or hyperactivity or with the finding of concurrent prostate cancer were excluded from the study. Follow up was assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Results: Median enucleation and morcellation time was 75.5 and 11.5 min, respectively, in the HoLEP group versus 70.5 and 12 min, respectively, in the ThuLEP group (p = 0.001 and 0.49, respectively). Enucleated adenoma weight was comparable (44 g versus 45.6 g, p = Correspondence to: Pirola Giacomo Maria 0.60). Energy index (3884.63 versus 4137.35 J/g, p = 0.30) and enucleation index (0.57 versus Department of Urology, 0.6 g/min, p 0.81) were similar in the two groups. Catheterization time was comparable (1 University of Modena and = Reggio Emilia, Via del versus 1 day; p = 0.14). The International Prostate Symptom Score and Quality of Life score Pozzo 71, Modena, 41124, Italy significantly decreased, as well as maximal urinary flow rate. Median prostate-specific antigen [email protected] (PSA) drop 1 year after surgery was 2.1 ng/ml in the HoLEP group (−52.83%) versus 1.75 ng/ml Giovanni Saredi Andrea Pacchetti in the ThuLEP group (−47.85%) (p = 0.013). Lorenzo Berti Conclusion: Both HoLEP (100 W) and ThuLEP (110 W) relieve lower urinary tract symptoms in Department of Urology, Ospedale di Circolo e a comparable way with high efficacy and safety, with negligible clinical differences. Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy Ricardo Codas Duarte Keywords: endoscopic enucleation of the prostate, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, Lionel Badet Hakim Fassi-Fehri matched-pair analysis, thulium laser enucleation of the prostate Department of Urology and Transplantation, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, Received: 22 November 2016; revised manuscript accepted: 25 January 2018. France Lorraine Bernard Clinical Research Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Introduction affirm its efficacy. A retrospective study by Elmansy Lyon, France Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate and colleagues1 reported long-term outcomes of Eugenio Martorana Department of Urology, (ThuLEP) and holmium laser enucleation of the HoLEP with a maximum follow up of 10 years University of Modena and prostate (HoLEP) are two endoscopic enuclea- (mean 62 months), reporting durable functional Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy tion of the prostate techniques. results with low reoperation rates. A recent meta- Giulio Carcano analysis by Cornu and colleagues2 compared func- Department of Surgery, HoLEP is part of the usual treatment in many uro- tional outcomes of different surgical treatments for Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, logical centers, and consistent literature findings benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), showing that Varese, Italy journals.sagepub.com/home/tau 1 Therapeutic Advances in Urology 00(0) HoLEP had more satisfactory outcomes than clas- Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and preopera- sic monopolar transurethral resection of the pros- tive symptomatology. To maximize the clarity tate (TURP), in terms of short-term urinary and correctness of data reporting, we referred function recovery, complication rate, and hospital in this paper to Strengthening the Reporting of stay. Observational Studies in Epidemiology state- ments reporting guidelines for observational In 2010, Herrmann and colleagues first proposed studies.8 a similar technique for prostatic adenoma enu- cleation using a thulium laser, called ThuLEP.3 Similarly to HoLEP, a number of studies have Clinical setting confirmed the feasibility and efficacy of ThuLEP. HoLEP (holmium laser enucleation of the prostate) A review by Barbalat and colleagues4 showed that Center, Lyon, France. HoLEP is routinely prac- thulium laser prostatectomy represents a safe and ticed in this institution by two experienced sur- effective procedure. geons since May 2013, who performed 80 interventions each, during the first 18 months of Regarding their physical properties, both lasers their experience. We didn’t consider for this study are ideal for endourological applications as they any patient who underwent the operation at the are completely absorbed by water, with a tissue beginning of the surgeon’s learning curve. During penetration depth of 0.4 mm for holmium and of the study period, 200 patients underwent the pro- 0.25 mm for thulium laser. The main difference is cedure. According to Shah and colleagues,9 a sur- that holmium has a pulsed energy, while thulium geon can be considered completely confident emits a continuous laser wave.5 with HoLEP after 50 cases, so the two surgeons could be considered experts at the time of this The only comparative study in a clinical setting of analysis. HoLEP and ThuLEP is that of Zhang and col- leagues6 that reported a monocentric randomiza- ThuLEP (thulium laser enucleation of the prostate) tion of 133 patients with a maximum prostate Center, Varese, Italy. ThuLEP has been practiced volume of 80 ml undergoing HoLEP or ThuLEP. in this center by two expert surgeons since June Adenoma enucleation was performed followed by 2012, with about 300 patients treated before the a ‘mushroom’ monopolar electroresection of the time considered for this study (about 150 proce- prostate lobes, following the technique described dures for each surgeon). As initially assessed by by Hochreiter and colleagues7 demonstrating Bach,10 the learning curve to acquire a complete their similar efficacy and safety. surgical skill in thulium laser enucleation is rela- tively fast; shorter than for HoLEP. In a previous In this study, we want to further investigate the work from our study group, 30 procedures were possible differences in terms of intraoperative var- shown as sufficient to fully achieve the skills iables, surgical complications, and outcomes required for the procedure.11 In May 2015, an ‘en between the two techniques. We herein present a bloc’ technique was introduced by one of the sur- matched-pair comparison between a large group geons (GS), although the patients treated with of HoLEP and ThuLEP procedures in two highly this new technique are not considered in the pres- experienced centers. ent study.12 Patients and methods Surgical indication This observational, retrospective and matched- Indications for prostatic enucleation were similar pair analysis was a controlled, but not rand- in both centers (see inclusion and exclusion crite- omized, study, based on the retrospective ria sections). Indication for prostatic enucleation analysis of prospectively collected data of a was symptomatic BPH refractory to medical ther- series of patients that underwent prostate laser apy. Independently from PV, patients were enucleation for symptomatic lower urinary enrolled for surgery if they presented a maximal tract symptoms (LUTS) between January 2015 urinary flow rate (Qmax) less than 15 ml per s, an and April 2017 in two different urological cent- International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ers. Comparability was guaranteed by a strict greater than 15 points, a history of repeated uri- analysis of clinical databases in terms of nary tract infections or recurrent episodes of uri- prostate volume (PV), American Society of nary retention. The IPSS questionnaire13 was 2 journals.sagepub.com/home/tau GM Pirola, G Saredi et al. administered to patients in national validated Surgical technique forms14,15 before surgery and thereafter during A similar surgical technique was practiced for follow-up controls. both HoLEP and ThuLEP. Following the initial depiction by Gilling and Fraundorfer for HoLEP16 Preoperative patient assessment included a physi- and Herrmann and colleagues for ThuLEP,3 a cal examination with digital rectal examination, three-lobe enucleation was performed. PSA assay, transrectal ecographic estimation of prostate volume, uroflowmetry, measurement of The ureteral orifices were first identified and postvoid residual urine (PVR), urine analysis and marked at short distance using coagulation. Then, urine culture. Moreover, symptomatologic ques- the median lobe was progressively incised at 5
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rare Earth Elements: the Global Supply Chain
    Rare Earth Elements: The Global Supply Chain Marc Humphries Analyst in Energy Policy September 30, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41347 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Rare Earth Elements: The Global Supply Chain Summary The concentration of production of rare earth elements (REEs) outside the United States raises the important issue of supply vulnerability. REEs are used for new energy technologies and national security applications. Is the United States vulnerable to supply disruptions of REEs? Are these elements essential to U.S. national security and economic well-being? There are 17 rare earth elements (REEs), 15 within the chemical group called lanthanides, plus yttrium and scandium. The lanthanides consist of the following: lanthanum, cerium, praseodymium, neodymium, promethium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, and lutetium. Rare earths are moderately abundant in the earth’s crust, some even more abundant than copper, lead, gold, and platinum. While more abundant than many other minerals, REE are not concentrated enough to make them easily exploitable economically. The United States was once self-reliant in domestically produced REEs, but over the past 15 years has become 100% reliant on imports, primarily from China, because of lower-cost operations. There is no rare earth mine production in the United States. U.S.-based Molycorp operates a separation plant at Mountain Pass, CA, and sells the rare earth concentrates and refined products from previously mined above-ground stocks. Neodymium, praseodymium, and lanthanum oxides are produced for further processing but these materials are not turned into rare earth metal in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the Periodic Table and Its Consequences Citation: J
    Firenze University Press www.fupress.com/substantia The Development of the Periodic Table and its Consequences Citation: J. Emsley (2019) The Devel- opment of the Periodic Table and its Consequences. Substantia 3(2) Suppl. 5: 15-27. doi: 10.13128/Substantia-297 John Emsley Copyright: © 2019 J. Emsley. This is Alameda Lodge, 23a Alameda Road, Ampthill, MK45 2LA, UK an open access, peer-reviewed article E-mail: [email protected] published by Firenze University Press (http://www.fupress.com/substantia) and distributed under the terms of the Abstract. Chemistry is fortunate among the sciences in having an icon that is instant- Creative Commons Attribution License, ly recognisable around the world: the periodic table. The United Nations has deemed which permits unrestricted use, distri- 2019 to be the International Year of the Periodic Table, in commemoration of the 150th bution, and reproduction in any medi- anniversary of the first paper in which it appeared. That had been written by a Russian um, provided the original author and chemist, Dmitri Mendeleev, and was published in May 1869. Since then, there have source are credited. been many versions of the table, but one format has come to be the most widely used Data Availability Statement: All rel- and is to be seen everywhere. The route to this preferred form of the table makes an evant data are within the paper and its interesting story. Supporting Information files. Keywords. Periodic table, Mendeleev, Newlands, Deming, Seaborg. Competing Interests: The Author(s) declare(s) no conflict of interest. INTRODUCTION There are hundreds of periodic tables but the one that is widely repro- duced has the approval of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) and is shown in Fig.1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Symbols of the Chemical Elements
    42 THE SYMBOLS OF THE CHEMICAL ELEMENTS DARRYL FRANCIS Sutton, Surrey, England [email protected] The names of the chemical elements have received a certain amount of attention in Word Wa s over the years. The very first issue of Word Ways in February 1968 presented a quiz on 20 transposed element names. Later articles have offered more extensive transpositions, trnsadditions, old names for some of the elements, elements in US placenames, and words composed solely of the element symbols, such as CoAgULaTe. In this article, I want to examine the symbols of the chemical elements as an ordered coUection of letters. Many earlier items in Word Ways have treated the typewriter (computer) keyboard as an ordered sequence of letters (QWERTYillOPASDFGHJKLZXCVBNM) and have posed ques­ tions such as: • What is the longest word with its letters spelled in keyboard order? • What is the longest word with its letter spelled in rever e keyboard order? • What is the longest word with letters from the first letter row? Similar questions can be raised with regard to the elemental symbols. First off let's take a look at the periodic table, the listing of chemical elements in atomic number order and the corre ponding symbols. The list below contains 109 elements, with atomic numbers from 1 to 109. For three f the elements (aluminum, sulfur, cesium) there exist variant Briti h pellings (aluminium ulphur, caesium). For elements 104 to 109 I have used the new provisional name rather than the earlier suggested names. My 1998 printing of the Merriam-Webster ollegiate Di tionary lOth editi n.
    [Show full text]
  • THULIUM Element Symbol: Tm Atomic Number: 69
    THULIUM Element Symbol: Tm Atomic Number: 69 An initiative of IYC 2011 brought to you by the RACI IONA JOHNSON www.raci.org.au THULIUM Element symbol: Tm Atomic number: 69 The element Thulium (when purified from mineral ores) is a silver-grey lustrous metal. Thulium metal is soft, malleable and ductile, and is so soft that it can be cut with a knife. The density is 9.32 grams per cubic centimetre: which is a bit lighter than Lead, but heavier than Iron, Copper, Nickel, and Tin. The surface of the metal will readily tarnish in air and produce an oxide. Thulium will also burn readily in air. Thulium will react slowly with cold water, and quite quickly with hot water to form Thulium hydroxide and Hydrogen. Thulium was named in honour of Thule: an ancient Roman name for a mythical country in the far North, which was probably Scandinavia. The first compound containing Thulium was discovered and named by Swedish Chemist Per Teodor Cleve (1840 – 1905) in 1879. Cleve made his discovery while studying the black-coloured rock that had been discovered around the town of Ytterby, Sweden in 1787. After removing all the other components from the rock the most interesting portion was where the Thulium accumulated because the solution possessed a bluish green colour. The compound was Thulium oxide (also called Thulia). Solid Thulium oxide has a pale green colour. The complete analysis of that rock took more than 100 years, and in the process nine new elements were discovered including Thulium. Pure metallic Thulium was not produced until 1910 by Charles James (1880-1928) an American chemist.
    [Show full text]
  • All-Fiber Passively Mode-Locked Thulium/Holmium Laser with Two Center Wavelengths
    All-fiber passively mode-locked thulium/holmium laser with two center wavelengths Rajesh Kadel and Brian R. Washburn* 116 Cardwell Hall, Kansas State University, Department of Physics, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA *Corresponding author: [email protected] Received 18 June 2012; revised 17 August 2012; accepted 17 August 2012; posted 20 August 2012 (Doc. ID 170797); published 11 September 2012 We have demonstrated a self-starting, passively mode-locked Tm/Ho codoped fiber laser that lases at one of two center wavelengths. An amplified 1.56 μm distributed feedback laser pumps a ring laser cavity which contains 1 m of Tm/Ho codoped silica fiber. Mode locking is obtained via nonlinear polarization rotation using a c-band polarization sensitive isolator with two polarization controllers. The laser is able to pulse separately at either 1.97 or 2.04 μm by altering the intracavity polarization during the initiation of mode locking. The codoped fiber permits pulsing at one of two wavelengths, where the shorter is due to the Tm3 emission and the longer due to the Ho3 emission. The laser produces a stable pulse train at 28.4 MHz with 25 mW average power, and a pulse duration of 966 fs with 9 nm bandwidth. © 2012 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: 060.2320, 140.3070, 190.4370. 1. Introduction power pulses. The frequency combs from these lasers Continuous and pulsed laser sources in the mid- can be extended to wavelengths outside their gain infrared region (3–10 μm) have long been sought after bandwidth using fiber nonlinearities. for many important applications such as medical di- Unfortunately there are few lasers that can produce agnostics [1], molecular identification [2], or gas mon- mid-IR frequency combs directly.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Table 1 Periodic Table
    Periodic table 1 Periodic table This article is about the table used in chemistry. For other uses, see Periodic table (disambiguation). The periodic table is a tabular arrangement of the chemical elements, organized on the basis of their atomic numbers (numbers of protons in the nucleus), electron configurations , and recurring chemical properties. Elements are presented in order of increasing atomic number, which is typically listed with the chemical symbol in each box. The standard form of the table consists of a grid of elements laid out in 18 columns and 7 Standard 18-column form of the periodic table. For the color legend, see section Layout, rows, with a double row of elements under the larger table. below that. The table can also be deconstructed into four rectangular blocks: the s-block to the left, the p-block to the right, the d-block in the middle, and the f-block below that. The rows of the table are called periods; the columns are called groups, with some of these having names such as halogens or noble gases. Since, by definition, a periodic table incorporates recurring trends, any such table can be used to derive relationships between the properties of the elements and predict the properties of new, yet to be discovered or synthesized, elements. As a result, a periodic table—whether in the standard form or some other variant—provides a useful framework for analyzing chemical behavior, and such tables are widely used in chemistry and other sciences. Although precursors exist, Dmitri Mendeleev is generally credited with the publication, in 1869, of the first widely recognized periodic table.
    [Show full text]
  • Separation of Radioactive Elements from Rare Earth Element-Bearing Minerals
    metals Review Separation of Radioactive Elements from Rare Earth Element-Bearing Minerals Adrián Carrillo García 1, Mohammad Latifi 1,2, Ahmadreza Amini 1 and Jamal Chaouki 1,* 1 Process Development Advanced Research Lab (PEARL), Chemical Engineering Department, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, C.P. 6079, Succ. Centre-ville, Montreal, QC H3C 3A7, Canada; [email protected] (A.C.G.); mohammad.latifi@polymtl.ca (M.L.); [email protected] (A.A.) 2 NeoCtech Corp., Montreal, QC H3G 2N7, Canada * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 8 October 2020; Accepted: 13 November 2020; Published: 17 November 2020 Abstract: Rare earth elements (REE), originally found in various low-grade deposits in the form of different minerals, are associated with gangues that have similar physicochemical properties. However, the production of REE is attractive due to their numerous applications in advanced materials and new technologies. The presence of the radioactive elements, thorium and uranium, in the REE deposits, is a production challenge. Their separation is crucial to gaining a product with minimum radioactivity in the downstream processes, and to mitigate the environmental and safety issues. In the present study, different techniques for separation of the radioactive elements from REE are reviewed, including leaching, precipitation, solvent extraction, and ion chromatography. In addition, the waste management of the separated radioactive elements is discussed with a particular conclusion that such a waste stream can be
    [Show full text]
  • BNL-79513-2007-CP Standard Atomic Weights Tables 2007 Abridged To
    BNL-79513-2007-CP Standard Atomic Weights Tables 2007 Abridged to Four and Five Significant Figures Norman E. Holden Energy Sciences & Technology Department National Nuclear Data Center Brookhaven National Laboratory P.O. Box 5000 Upton, NY 11973-5000 www.bnl.gov Prepared for the 44th IUPAC General Assembly, in Torino, Italy August 2007 Notice: This manuscript has been authored by employees of Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The publisher by accepting the manuscript for publication acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. This preprint is intended for publication in a journal or proceedings. Since changes may be made before publication, it may not be cited or reproduced without the author’s permission. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Extraterrestrial Rare Earth Elements: to the Moon and Beyond
    resources Article Sources of Extraterrestrial Rare Earth Elements: To the Moon and Beyond Claire L. McLeod 1,* and Mark. P. S. Krekeler 2 1 Department of Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences, 203 Shideler Hall, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA 2 Department of Geology and Environmental Earth Science, Miami University-Hamilton, Hamilton, OH 45011, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: 513-529-9662; Fax: 513-529-1542 Received: 10 June 2017; Accepted: 18 August 2017; Published: 23 August 2017 Abstract: The resource budget of Earth is limited. Rare-earth elements (REEs) are used across the world by society on a daily basis yet several of these elements have <2500 years of reserves left, based on current demand, mining operations, and technologies. With an increasing population, exploration of potential extraterrestrial REE resources is inevitable, with the Earth’s Moon being a logical first target. Following lunar differentiation at ~4.50–4.45 Ga, a late-stage (after ~99% solidification) residual liquid enriched in Potassium (K), Rare-earth elements (REE), and Phosphorus (P), (or “KREEP”) formed. Today, the KREEP-rich region underlies the Oceanus Procellarum and Imbrium Basin region on the lunar near-side (the Procellarum KREEP Terrain, PKT) and has been tentatively estimated at preserving 2.2 × 108 km3 of KREEP-rich lithologies. The majority of lunar samples (Apollo, Luna, or meteoritic samples) contain REE-bearing minerals as trace phases, e.g., apatite and/or merrillite, with merrillite potentially contributing up to 3% of the PKT. Other lunar REE-bearing lunar phases include monazite, yittrobetafite (up to 94,500 ppm yttrium), and tranquillityite (up to 4.6 wt % yttrium, up to 0.25 wt % neodymium), however, lunar sample REE abundances are low compared to terrestrial ores.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elements.Pdf
    A Periodic Table of the Elements at Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory's Chemistry Division Presents Periodic Table of the Elements A Resource for Elementary, Middle School, and High School Students Click an element for more information: Group** Period 1 18 IA VIIIA 1A 8A 1 2 13 14 15 16 17 2 1 H IIA IIIA IVA VA VIAVIIA He 1.008 2A 3A 4A 5A 6A 7A 4.003 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 Li Be B C N O F Ne 6.941 9.012 10.81 12.01 14.01 16.00 19.00 20.18 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 3 Na Mg IIIB IVB VB VIB VIIB ------- VIII IB IIB Al Si P S Cl Ar 22.99 24.31 3B 4B 5B 6B 7B ------- 1B 2B 26.98 28.09 30.97 32.07 35.45 39.95 ------- 8 ------- 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 4 K Ca Sc Ti V Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge As Se Br Kr 39.10 40.08 44.96 47.88 50.94 52.00 54.94 55.85 58.47 58.69 63.55 65.39 69.72 72.59 74.92 78.96 79.90 83.80 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 5 Rb Sr Y Zr NbMo Tc Ru Rh PdAgCd In Sn Sb Te I Xe 85.47 87.62 88.91 91.22 92.91 95.94 (98) 101.1 102.9 106.4 107.9 112.4 114.8 118.7 121.8 127.6 126.9 131.3 55 56 57 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 6 Cs Ba La* Hf Ta W Re Os Ir Pt AuHg Tl Pb Bi Po At Rn 132.9 137.3 138.9 178.5 180.9 183.9 186.2 190.2 190.2 195.1 197.0 200.5 204.4 207.2 209.0 (210) (210) (222) 87 88 89 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 114 116 118 7 Fr Ra Ac~RfDb Sg Bh Hs Mt --- --- --- --- --- --- (223) (226) (227) (257) (260) (263) (262) (265) (266) () () () () () () http://pearl1.lanl.gov/periodic/ (1 of 3) [5/17/2001 4:06:20 PM] A Periodic Table of the Elements at Los Alamos National Laboratory 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 Lanthanide Series* Ce Pr NdPmSm Eu Gd TbDyHo Er TmYbLu 140.1 140.9 144.2 (147) 150.4 152.0 157.3 158.9 162.5 164.9 167.3 168.9 173.0 175.0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 Actinide Series~ Th Pa U Np Pu AmCmBk Cf Es FmMdNo Lr 232.0 (231) (238) (237) (242) (243) (247) (247) (249) (254) (253) (256) (254) (257) ** Groups are noted by 3 notation conventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon DEQ Briefing Paper: Rare Earth Elements
    Briefing Paper: Rare Earth Elements Oct. 4, 2011 Primary Author: Barb Puchy Executive Summary This paper describes rare earth elements - their composition, qualities and uses – and how these difficult-to-extract elements play a role in the global material management system. It describes how these elements may become more critical in the future for the military and for technologies including hybrid cars, wind turbines, cell phones and spy planes. This paper looks at the environmental consequences of using rare earth minerals, their limited availability, and how reusing and recycling these elements can be part of a more sustainable worldwide system. Rare earth elements include 17 chemical elements that are not really “rare” but are actually relatively abundant in the Earth’s crust. However, they seldom exist in pure form and are rarely in concentrated minable deposits, making them costly to extract. They include lanthanum, cerium, praseodymium, neodymium, promethium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, and lutetium (the lanthanide elements on periodic table). Yttrium and scandium are also often considered rare earth elements since they tend to occur in the same ore deposits as the lanthanides and exhibit similar chemical properties. These rare earth elements’ unique properties have led to an ever-increasing variety of applications. These include uses in major industries such as automotive, medical, defense, technology/computers and clean energy, as well as use in hybrid cars and wind turbines. Because of widespread use of these elements in technology, particularly by the military, the U.S. is examining domestic deposits with renewed interest and funding. Currently, about 97 percent of the world supply of rare earth elements comes from China.
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic Weights of the Elements 2011 (IUPAC Technical Report)*
    Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 85, No. 5, pp. 1047–1078, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/PAC-REP-13-03-02 © 2013 IUPAC, Publication date (Web): 29 April 2013 Atomic weights of the elements 2011 (IUPAC Technical Report)* Michael E. Wieser1,‡, Norman Holden2, Tyler B. Coplen3, John K. Böhlke3, Michael Berglund4, Willi A. Brand5, Paul De Bièvre6, Manfred Gröning7, Robert D. Loss8, Juris Meija9, Takafumi Hirata10, Thomas Prohaska11, Ronny Schoenberg12, Glenda O’Connor13, Thomas Walczyk14, Shige Yoneda15, and Xiang-Kun Zhu16 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; 2Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA; 3U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA; 4Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, Geel, Belgium; 5Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany; 6Independent Consultant on MiC, Belgium; 7International Atomic Energy Agency, Seibersdorf, Austria; 8Department of Applied Physics, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia; 9National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada; 10Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; 11Department of Chemistry, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria; 12Institute for Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; 13New Brunswick Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA; 14Department of Chemistry (Science) and Department of Biochemistry (Medicine), National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore; 15National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo, Japan; 16Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, China Abstract: The biennial review of atomic-weight determinations and other cognate data has resulted in changes for the standard atomic weights of five elements. The atomic weight of bromine has changed from 79.904(1) to the interval [79.901, 79.907], germanium from 72.63(1) to 72.630(8), indium from 114.818(3) to 114.818(1), magnesium from 24.3050(6) to the interval [24.304, 24.307], and mercury from 200.59(2) to 200.592(3).
    [Show full text]