C Subline 13: Masox Am Doku
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Analysis of the possibilities of electric minibus operation Electro-mobility Internal Deliverable No.: DI5.02.02 Project Acronym: 2MOVE2 Full Title: New forms of sustainable urban transport and mobility Grant Agreement No.: 296036 Workpackage/Measure No.: WP 5 / B5.02 Workpackage/ Measure Title: Development of electro- mobility and introduction of electric mini-buses on the route within Brno city centre Responsible Author(s): Jiri Cerny Responsible Co-Author(s): Zdenek Jarolin Date: 30th June 2014 Status: Draft / Final Dissemination level: Public/ Confidential Cleaner and better transport in cities Abstract The aim of the measure is to introduce and promote electric technologies for private and public transport like a substitution of conventional way of operating cars and buses powered by diesel. The first part of the measure is concerned on preparation the concept of support and use of alternative drives (electric car, electric bus) and possibilities for building of charging stations in the parking objects. In addition it was commissioned the study about e- mobility and the possibilities to improve sustainability in the town. This study finish in spring 2014. The second part of measure is focused on the development of electro/mobility introduction of electric mini/buses in the historical centre. The measure leader is SMB, but DPMB is responsible for all the effort done in this measure. This measure is consultated with energy company, that constructed first private charging station in the Czech Republic. The main area, that will be affected, are certain parts of the city centre, which had so far been inaccessible by public transport due to the lack of vehicles of suitable size and technical specifications. Also the benefits could be improved traffic flows and tourist attraction. Within this measure it will be purchased three electric minibuses that should be used for route near the city centre. The exact route and operation parameters will be outputs of the study, it is expected that the route can be: Špilberk (castle) – Česká (centre) – Vila Tugendhat (Unesco heritage). Project Partners Organization Country Abbreviation Brno City Municipality CZ SMB Dopravní podnik města Brna CZ DPMB Document History Date Person Action Status Diss. Level Jiri Cerny 27/6/14 Analysis of possiblities WP 5 / B5.02 Draft SC, EM, TC Zdenek Jarolin Status: Draft, Final, Approved, and Submitted. Dissemination Level: PC = Project Coordinator, SC=Site Coordinator, TC=Technical Coordinator, EM=Evaluation Manager. Organisation • Date 2 / 43 Cleaner and better transport in cities Contents INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 6 1. THE STUDY .................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1. PROCESS OF ELABORATION OF THE STUDY ................................................................................. 7 1.2. CONTENT OF THE STUDY ............................................................................................................ 7 1.2.1. Institutional frame ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.2.2. Demography of Brno ..................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.3. Private use of electro-mobility ...................................................................................................... 8 2. ELECTROMOBILITY IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT .......................................................................... 10 2.1. OPPORTUNITIES FOR INTRODUCTION OF ELECTRO-BUSES IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT ......................... 12 2.1.1. Regular lines in the city centre .................................................................................................... 13 2.1.2. Tangential lines ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.1.3. Tourist lines ................................................................................................................................. 14 2.1.4. Extension of trolleybus lines ........................................................................................................ 14 2.1.5. Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ............................................................................................................... 15 2.2. PLACEMENT OF PUBLIC RECHARGING STATIONS FOR PRIVATE USE .............................................. 15 2.2.1. Charging infrastructure ............................................................................................................... 15 2.2.2. Unified system of charging connectors ....................................................................................... 15 3. ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL ELECTRIC BUS ROUTES ............................................................. 16 3.1. ROUTE B1 ............................................................................................................................... 16 3.2. ROUTE B2 ............................................................................................................................... 17 3.3. ROUTE B3 ............................................................................................................................... 18 3.4. ROUTE B4 ............................................................................................................................... 20 3.5. ROUTE T1 ............................................................................................................................... 21 3.6. ROUTE T2 ............................................................................................................................... 22 4. ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT OF ELECTRO-MOBILITY ............ 24 4.1. SOCIAL EFFECTS ...................................................................................................................... 24 4.2. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ....................................................................................................... 24 Organisation • Date 3 / 43 Cleaner and better transport in cities 5. PROPOSAL OF BASIC PARAMETERS FOR THE CALL FOR ELECTRIC-MINIBUSES FOR BRNO .................................................................................................................................................... 27 6. PROPOSAL OF MEASURES FOR SUPPORT OF ELECTRO-MOBILITY IN BRNO ................. 29 6.1. FINANCIAL MEASURES .............................................................................................................. 29 6.2. NON-FINANCIAL MEASURES ...................................................................................................... 29 6.3. STRATEGIC MEASURES ............................................................................................................. 29 7. CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................... 30 7.1. OPPORTUNITIES FOR ELECTRO-MOBILITY IN THE CITY OF BRNO .................................................. 30 8. TESTING OF ELECTRIC BUSES IN BRNO ................................................................................ 31 8.1. HISTORY OF ELECTROMOBILITY IN BRNO ................................................................................... 31 8.2. ALTERNATIVE FUELS IN BRNO ................................................................................................... 31 9. TESTING METHODS AND INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 33 9.1. DEVELOPMENT OF ELECTROMOBILITY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC .................................................. 33 9.2. ELECTRIC BUSES IN BRNO ........................................................................................................ 33 9.3. TESTING METHODS AND ASSESSED ASPECTS ............................................................................. 34 Driveability and driver’s comfort .................................................................................................................. 34 Electric energy consumption ........................................................................................................................ 34 Battery capacity and range per charge ........................................................................................................ 35 Length of the bus and passenger capacity ................................................................................................... 35 Recharging methods ..................................................................................................................................... 35 Comparison with trolleybuses ...................................................................................................................... 36 10. TESTED ELECTRIC BUSES .................................................................................................... 36 10.1. SOR EBN 10.5 ................................................................................................................... 36 10.2. AMZ CITYSMILE 10E ........................................................................................................... 38 10.3. IVECO SKD STRATOS LE 30 E ..........................................................................................