DOCSLIB.ORG

2012–2013 Sustainability Report by Generating Companies of Gazprom

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2012–2013 Sustainability Report by Generating Companies of Gazprom 2012–2013 Sustainability Report by Generating Companies of Gazprom Energoholding 2012–2013 Sustainability Report by Generating Companies of Gazprom Energoholding Table of Contents Table of Contents Report Profile . 3 Water management . 53 CEO Statement . 4 Industrial waste generation . 57 About Our Companies . 8 Fines and non-financial penalties imposed on the Company for violation of environmental laws . 59 Business map . 8 Environmental costs and investments . 60 Company overview . 12 Environmental complaints received by the companies in 2012–2013 . 61 Corporate supply chain . 15 Environmental awards . 61 Business units included in the consolidated financial statements . 17 Labour Sustainability . 62 Corporate governance structure . 17 Management's approach to HR policy and occupational health and safety . 62 Corporate values, principles, standards and rules of conduct . 19 Corporate human resources . 62 Membership in organisations . 19 Staff remuneration . 64 Material changes in the organisation during the reporting period . 21 Protection of employees' interests and rights; collective bargaining . 67 Stakeholder Relations . 23 Occupational health and safety at workplace . 68 Key stakeholder groups . 23 Raising the quality of human resources . 71 Ways of stakeholder interaction . 24 Preventing corruption among the Company's employees . 73 Organisation’s approach to risk management . 28 Social sustainability . 74 Economic Sustainability . 32 Management's approach to corporate projects that have an impact on society; availability of grievance Management's approach to ensure economic sustainability within the organisation and investment decision- mechanisms . 74 making . 32 Ensuring reliable energy supply in the short and longer terms . 74 Financial and economic performance . 33 Cooperation with local communities on safety . 76 Increased demand from private, commercial, institutional, and industrial consumers . 34 Cooperation with local communities on energy saving . 78 Decommissioning of inefficient facilities . 35 Cooperation with local communities on the environment . 79 Infrastructure investment projects . 36 Not-for-profit infrastructure projects run by the Company on a pro bono basis . 80 R&D for more reliable energy supply and sustainable business growth . 39 Cooperation with local communities on culture and sports . 81 Government support received by the Company over the reporting period . 41 Contacts . 83 Environmental Sustainability . 42 GRI Content Index . 84 Management’s approach to environmental aspects of the Company’s activities . 42 Fuel use and energy efficiency . 44 Pollutant and GHG emissions . 49 Climate change . 52 2 2012–2013 Sustainability Report by Generating Companies of Gazprom Energoholding Report Profile Report Profile This represents the first sustainability report of Gazprom Group’s Generating Companies (the “generating companies”) for the calendar years 2012–2013. G4-18 G4-20 How did we prepare this sustainability re- What scope and boundaries have we cho- What were the sources of information for G4-21 port? sen for this sustainability report? this sustainability report? This sustainability report has been pre- We have chosen a biennial reporting cy- We used management reports and most G4-22 pared in reference with the principles and cle, in line with the existing corporate prac- recent audited IFRS financial statements as G4-23 guidance in the Global Reporting Initiative tices of OAO Gazprom, our parent company . of the date of this report as the key source G4-28 Guidelines (GRI 4), including the Electric This report focuses mostly on the data for the of information on performance by the gen- G4-29 Utility Sector Supplement, and is “in accor- last two calendar years (2012 and 2013) . But erating companies . The data reflecting the G4-30 dance” with the Core option in terms of dis- since this is our first sustainability report, it performance of our generating companies G4-32 closure . also discloses our previous achievements on aspects not covered by management re- Going forward, we plan to gradually ex- that are most relevant to our stakeholders ports or financial statements were obtained G4-33 pand the amount of information to be dis- and to further sustainable development of by sending information requests to relevant closed in our sustainability reports and move our generating companies . units of the companies in reference with G4 to the Comprehensive level . For this reason, This report discusses the sustainable Sustainability Reporting Guidelines . this report provides wider disclosure on cer- development of Gazprom Energoholding’s Unless indicated otherwise, data for Gaz- tain aspects than is required by the Core op- three generating companies: OAO Mosener- prom Energoholding provided in this report tion . go, OAO TGC-11, and OAO OGK-2 [all listed are consolidated data for the three com- For a full list of aspects covered by this on the Moscow Exchange] . The report does panies, OAO Mosenergo, OAO TGC-1 and report and the relevant page number in the not disclose sustainability-related informa- OAO OGK-2 . report, please see the GRI Content Index sec- tion about OAO MOEK’s performance as the The report contains mid-term and long- tion . company only joined Gazprom Energohold- term plans of Gazprom Energoholding’s This sustainability report has undergone ing in late 2013 . We intend to expand the generating companies . Their implementa- a “Materiality Matters” check by GRI experts . scope of our next sustainability report by tion is subject to inherent risks and uncer- In preparing this report, we did not hold any adding information on OAO MOEK’s perfor- tainties including factors beyond the control public hearings involving representatives of mance . of Gazprom Energoholding’s generating relevant stakeholders, but we plan to con- companies . sider this going forward . Fig. 1. OOO Gazprom Energoholding, OAO Mosenergo, OAO OGK-2 headquarters, Moscow 3 1 Including OAO Murmanskaya CHP 2012–2013 Sustainability Report by Generating Companies of Gazprom Energoholding CEO Statement CEO Statement Dear colleagues and partners, G4-1 Thank you for reading this first sustainability report by Gazprom Energoholding’s generating companies . Why are sustainability issues important ing them with new capacity . Many of our in- improving ROE, optimising the fuel mix and pacity supply agreements (CSA) . CSA terms companies in our efforts to make operations to our companies today? vestment projects feature unique know-how achieving synergies through combining gas provide for investment in the construction more competitive . First of all, because uninterrupted electric- solutions . business and power generation as a key goal of new generation facilities with guaranteed Today, our key strategic sustainability pri- ity and heat supply to industrial consumers We are committed to the openness and in developing the company’s power genera- cost reimbursement as costs are reflected in orities include: and households in many Russian regions, transparency of our business and maintain tion business . To develop Gazprom Group’s the final price of capacity, resulting in an IRR 1) Ensuring reliable, safe and efficient op- including such key cities as Moscow, Saint an open dialogue with all stakeholders, be- power generation business the Strategy rate of at least 14% . The heat supply segment eration of power plants and heat supply net- Petersburg and Sochi, relies on generating lieving that the disclosure of non-financial in- provided for the acquisition of interests in is still regulated, although a phased reform works; capacities of our companies . This means formation about our performance in the form generating companies, construction of new process is underway . Power generation has 2) Increasing the operating efficiency and everyday responsibility for the quality and of a sustainability report will become a good capacities and the establishment of a holding become a rapidly growing, promising line of market capitalisation of Gazprom Energo- safety of lives and jobs of tens of millions of starting point for such dialogue . company to consolidate Gazprom Group’s business for Gazprom Group . holding’s assets; people! One of our objectives consists in increas- power generation assets . OOO Gazprom 3) Improving our competitive edge in the Given the high technological complexity ing the shareholder value of our generating Energoholding [100% subsidiary of OAO What are our strategic sustainability utility market by unlocking our potential in and the scale of our operations, we have to companies . Sustainability performance is an Gazprom] became such a company, which goals and priorities? operations and technology; look beyond simple economic efficiency . The increasingly important driver of a business' started developing and introducing common As reform continues in the Russian en- 4) Building an optimal capacity mix by unique character of our equipment requires market value, one that is considered by most corporate standards for management of the ergy sector, with the initial goal of creating a completing the implementation of CSA pro- us to continuously improve the safety of op- major players in the stock market . generating companies, OAO Mosenergo, competitive environment in the industry, we grammes, upgrading fixed assets and de- erations and provide continuous training and OAO TGC-1 and OAO OGK-2 . are encouraged to focus on improvements commissioning inefficient facilities; education to our employees . How was
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure- Present State And
    Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure – Present State and Future Potential By Claes Lykke Ragner FNI Report 13/2000 FRIDTJOF NANSENS INSTITUTT THE FRIDTJOF NANSEN INSTITUTE Tittel/Title Sider/Pages Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure – Present 124 State and Future Potential Publikasjonstype/Publication Type Nummer/Number FNI Report 13/2000 Forfatter(e)/Author(s) ISBN Claes Lykke Ragner 82-7613-400-9 Program/Programme ISSN 0801-2431 Prosjekt/Project Sammendrag/Abstract The report assesses the Northern Sea Route’s commercial potential and economic importance, both as a transit route between Europe and Asia, and as an export route for oil, gas and other natural resources in the Russian Arctic. First, it conducts a survey of past and present Northern Sea Route (NSR) cargo flows. Then follow discussions of the route’s commercial potential as a transit route, as well as of its economic importance and relevance for each of the Russian Arctic regions. These discussions are summarized by estimates of what types and volumes of NSR cargoes that can realistically be expected in the period 2000-2015. This is then followed by a survey of the status quo of the NSR infrastructure (above all the ice-breakers, ice-class cargo vessels and ports), with estimates of its future capacity. Based on the estimated future NSR cargo potential, future NSR infrastructure requirements are calculated and compared with the estimated capacity in order to identify the main, future infrastructure bottlenecks for NSR operations. The information presented in the report is mainly compiled from data and research results that were published through the International Northern Sea Route Programme (INSROP) 1993-99, but considerable updates have been made using recent information, statistics and analyses from various sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Arctic 6/2019 15
    Russian Arctic 6/2019 DOI: 10.24411/2658-4255-2019-10063 ADULT INCIDENCE IN THE RUSSIAN EUROPEAN ARCTIC WITH DEVELOPED MINING AND METALLURGICAL INDUSTRY A. N. Nikanov, V.M. Dorofeev, L.V. Talykova, N.V. Sturlis, I.V. Gushin Kola Research Laboratory for Occupational Health, Kirovsk, Murmansk region, Russia [email protected] The purpose of the research. The research aims to assess the adult incidence within the mining complex in the Murmansk Region (the Russian Arctic). Materials and methods. The analysis of the adult incidence change in 1989- 1990, 1999-2000, 2009-2010 and 2014-2015 was carried out. To assess the population health status, the incidence data was used in this work. The research covers the territory of the municipal formations with the city-forming mining and metallurgical complex (MMC) enterprises in the Murmansk Region. Main results and conclusions. It has been established that between 1989 and 2015 the adult incidence in the MMC territories, as well as in the Murmansk Region at large, clearly tends to increase (the coefficient of determination R2>0,7) for the following disease categories: neoplasms; endocrine diseases; diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs; diseases of the nervous system and sense organs; diseases of the circulatory system; diseases of the genitourinary system; diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue; congenital malformations. There is no doubt that a set of climatic, geographical and production factors, along with the pollution of the natural environment within the MMC territories in the Murmansk Region, has a negative impact on the health status of the adult population, including working individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1
    RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1 No. 33 Summer 2003 Special issue: The Transformation of Protected Areas in Russia A Ten-Year Review PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild (Letter from the Editors)......................................1 Ten Years of Teaching and Learning in Bolshaya Kokshaga Zapovednik ...............................................................24 BY WAY OF AN INTRODUCTION The Formation of Regional Associations A Brief History of Modern Russian Nature Reserves..........................2 of Protected Areas........................................................................................................27 A Glossary of Russian Protected Areas...........................................................3 The Growth of Regional Nature Protection: A Case Study from the Orlovskaya Oblast ..............................................29 THE PAST TEN YEARS: Making Friends beyond Boundaries.............................................................30 TRENDS AND CASE STUDIES A Spotlight on Kerzhensky Zapovednik...................................................32 Geographic Development ........................................................................................5 Ecotourism in Protected Areas: Problems and Possibilities......34 Legal Developments in Nature Protection.................................................7 A LOOK TO THE FUTURE Financing Zapovedniks ...........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • 280419 EU Project Kepler
    EU Project Kepler: Community-Based Observing and Societal Needs Work Report, April 2019 1 Tero Mustonen (editor) with regional coordinators and authors Kaisu Mustonen Jan Saijets Pauliina Feodoroff Jevgeni Kirillov Stefan Mikaelsson Camilla Brattland 2 Contents I. Introduction and Scope 4 II. Materials and Methods 6 III. Needs 13 Sweden 13 Finland 18 Norway 30 NW Russia 32 IV. Gaps 43 Sweden 43 Finland 43 Norway 50 NW Russia 55 V. Priorities 59 Sweden 62 Finland 64 NW Russia 64 VI. Conclusions 69 References 73 3 I. Introduction and Scope Participants of the Inari Kepler Workshop: Stefan Mikaelsson, Pauliina Feodoroff, Kaisu Mustonen, Tero Mustonen, Eirik Malnes, Jevgeni Kirillov. Snowchange, 2019 4 The purpose of this report is to review the stakeholder needs and community-based observations for the EU project “Kepler”1. It will focus on the remote sensing needs of the local and Indigenous communities of NW Russia, Sweden, Finland and Norway. The approach includes a discussion of cryospheric hazards and traditional weather observation and prediction materials from the Sámi communities. It has been produced to capture the results of the WP 1 of the Kepler project. Regional Coordinator Jevgeni Kirillov discusses land use changes in Ponoi watershed. Snowchange, 2019 The science lead for the report has been Tero Mustonen from Snowchange Co-op. Co-authors for the regional chapters and cryospheric hazards include 1 https://kepler-polar.eu/home/. KEPLER is a multi-partner initiative, built around the operational European Ice Services and Copernicus information providers, to prepare a roadmap for Copernicus to deliver an improved European capacity for monitoring and forecasting the Polar Regions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Industrial North.Pdf
    RISK AND SAFETY INDUSTRIAL NORTH NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENT Risk and Safety Industrial North Nuclear Technologies and Environment Moscow 2004 The Industrial North. Nuclear Technologies and Environment. — Moscow, «Komtechprint» Publishing House, 2004, 40 p. ISBN 5-89107-053-7 The edition addresses specialists of the legislative /executive authorities and those of local government of the north-west region; activists of public environmental movements; and teachers and students of higher educa- tion institutes as well as all those who are interested in the problems of stable development of the Russian North. This document is prepared by the Nuclear Safety Institute (IBRAE RAS) under work sponsored by the United States Department of Energy. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof including the U.S. Department of Energy and any and all employees of the U.S. Government, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or use- fulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe upon privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific entity, product, process, or service by name, trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not neces- sarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. ISBN 5-89107-053-7 Ó IBRAE RAS, 2004 Ó«Komtechprint», 2004 (Design) INTRODUCTION Industrialization of the majority of Russian regions took part of the brochure is dedicated to the forecast, preven- place during an era when environmental safety was not tion and mitigation of nuclear/radiological emergencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject of the Russian Federation)
    How to use the Atlas The Atlas has two map sections The Main Section shows the location of Russia’s intact forest landscapes. The Thematic Section shows their tree species composition in two different ways. The legend is placed at the beginning of each set of maps. If you are looking for an area near a town or village Go to the Index on page 153 and find the alphabetical list of settlements by English name. The Cyrillic name is also given along with the map page number and coordinates (latitude and longitude) where it can be found. Capitals of regions and districts (raiony) are listed along with many other settlements, but only in the vicinity of intact forest landscapes. The reader should not expect to see a city like Moscow listed. Villages that are insufficiently known or very small are not listed and appear on the map only as nameless dots. If you are looking for an administrative region Go to the Index on page 185 and find the list of administrative regions. The numbers refer to the map on the inside back cover. Having found the region on this map, the reader will know which index map to use to search further. If you are looking for the big picture Go to the overview map on page 35. This map shows all of Russia’s Intact Forest Landscapes, along with the borders and Roman numerals of the five index maps. If you are looking for a certain part of Russia Find the appropriate index map. These show the borders of the detailed maps for different parts of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Barents-Predators-Seminar-Draft
    Draft February 27th PROGRAM of International Seminar «Migration of Wild Predators near Populated Areas in the Barents Euro-Arctic Region» Wednesday, March 4, 2020 During Arrival of participants to the airport of Arkhangelsk. the day Transfer from the airport to «Novotel» hotel (Severnaya Dvina Emb., 55, ph.: +7 (8182) 22-99-88; self-service check-in at: accorhotels.com/9764) (local transport is provided by the host side) 19:00 – 21:00 Dinner at «Novotel» hotel (organised by the host side for non-resident participants) Thursday, March 5, 2020 09:20 – 09:40 Transfer from «Novotel» hotel to Arkhangelsk Region Government building (Conference room, Troitsky ave., 49/1) 09:40 – 10:00 Registration of participants, welcoming coffee 10:00 – 10:30 Official opening of the Seminar. Moderator: Mr. Tomas Hallberg, Head of the International Barents Secretariat (Kirkenes, Norway) Opening speeches: 1) Igor Orlov, Arkhangelsk Region Governor; 2) Magdalena Andersson, Governor of Västerbotten County, Sweden; 3) Nikolay Morgunov, Director, «Federal Centre of Hunting Industry Development» 10:30 – 11:30 Presentation of reports. Part 1. (speech time limit – up to 10 minutes). Moderator: tbc 1) Alexander Erulik, Minister of Natural Resources and Timber- Industry Complex of Arkhangelsk Region. Introductory report: «Information on Wild Predators Migration in Arkhangelsk Region» 2 2) Nikolay Morgunov, Director, «Federal Centre of Hunting Industry Development». Theme: tbc 3) Anatoly Pavlov, Head of State Supervision and Control Unit, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection of the Republic of Komi. Theme: «The Situation in the Republic of Komi on Wild Predators Migration Led to Their Presence in Populated Areas»; 4) Roman Mazurets, Head of Department for Protection, Control and Regulation of Wildlife Exploitation of Vologda Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Studying Phenological Phenomena in Subarctic Biomes with International School Pupils As Citizen Scientists
    Received: 29 June 2020 | Revised: 2 October 2020 | Accepted: 26 November 2020 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7122 ACADEMIC PRACTICE IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION Studying phenological phenomena in subarctic biomes with international school pupils as citizen scientists Cornelya F. C. Klütsch1 | Paul Eric Aspholm2 | Natalia Polikarpova3 | Olga Veisblium4 | Tor-Arne Bjørn2 | Anne Wikan1 | Victoria Gonzalez1 | Snorre B. Hagen1 1Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, NIBIO – Division of Environment Abstract and Natural Resources, Ås, Norway Citizen science can facilitate in-depth learning for pupils and students, contribute 2 Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy to scientific research, and permit civic participation. Here, we describe the develop- Research, NIBIO – Division of Forest and Forest Resources, Ås, Norway ment of the transnational school-based citizen science project Phenology of the North 3Pasvik State Nature Reserve, Rayakosky, Calotte. Its primary goal is to introduce pupils (age 12–15; grades 7–10) in northern Russia Norway, Russia, and Finland to the local and global challenges of climate change re- 4Kandalaksha State Nature Reserve, Kandalaksha, Russia sulting in life cycle changes at different trophic and ecosystem levels in their back- yards. Partnerships between regional scientists and staff from NIBIO Svanhovd, Correspondence Cornelya F. C. Klütsch and Snorre B. State nature reserves, national parks, and teachers and pupils from regional schools Hagen, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy aim to engage pupils in project-based learning. The project uses standardized proto- Research, NIBIO – Division of Environment and Natural Resources, Svanvik, Norway. cols, translated into the different languages of participating schools. The phenologi- Emails: [email protected] (C.K.); cal observations are centered around documenting clearly defined life cycle phases [email protected] (S.H.) (e.g., first appearance of species, flowering, ripening, leaf yellowing, snow fall, and Funding information melt).
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Potential Risk for Kola's Population from Radiological
    Assessment of Potential Risk for Kola’s Population from Radiological Impact of Accident on Spent Nuclear Fuel Facilities Andrey Naumov Sergey Morozov Pavel Amossov Alexander Mahura Mining Institute, Vsevolod Koshkin Kola Science Centre Yuri Federenko Alexander Baklanov Institute of Northern Ecology (Scientific Advisor) Problems, Kola Science Centre Danish Metrological Institute Northern Studies Working Paper cerum, Centre for Regional Science No. 21:2001 se-90187 Umeå Sweden Umeå University cerum, Centre for Regional Science Assessment of Potential Risk for Kola’s Population from Radiological Impact of Accident on Spent Nuclear Fuel Facilities Andrey Naumov Sergey Morozov Pavel Amossov Alexander Mahura Mining Institute, Vsevolod Koshkin Kola Science Centre Yuri Federenko Institute of Northern Ecology Alexander Baklanov Problems, Kola Science Centre (Scientific Advisor), Danish Meterological Institute cerum Northern Studies Working Paper no. 21 isbn 91-7305-105-5 issn 1400-1969 Address: Cerum, Umeå University, se-901 87 Umeå, Sweden Telephone: +46-90-786.6079, Fax: +46-90-786.5121 www.umu.se/cerum [email protected] 4 Modelling and Visualizing a Nuclear Accident’s Short Term Impact on Transportation Flows Table of Contents Table of Contents, 5 List of Abbreviations, 7 List of Figures, 9 List of Tables, 11 The Project “Nuclear Problems, Risk Perceptions of, and Societal Responses to, Nuclear Waste in the Barents Region” - an Acknowledgement, 13 Executive Summary, 14 Introduction, 17 1Modern Approaches to the Risk Analysis, 21 1.1. Base of risk analysis, 21 1.2. Methods of realization of the risk analysis, 24 1.3. Main parameters of risk, 25 1.4. The methods of quantitative analysis of risk, 26 1.5.
    [Show full text]
  • As of September 30, 2020
    LIST OF AFFILIATES Sberbank of Russia (full corporate name of the joint stock company) Issuer code: 0 1 4 8 1 – V as 3 0 0 9 2 0 2 0 of (indicate the date on which the list of affiliates of the joint stock company was compiled) Address of the issuer: 117997, Moscow, 19 Vavilova St. (address of the issuer – the joint stock company – indicated in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities where a body or a representative of the joint stock company is located) Information contained in this list of affiliates is subject to disclosure pursuant to the laws of the Russian Federation on securities. Website: http://www.sberbank.com; http://www.e-disclosure.ru/portal/company.aspx?id=3043 (the website used by the issuer to disclose information) Managing Director, Head of the Corporate Secretary Service (under the Power of Attorney No. 887-В (887-Д) dated 16 September 2019) original signed O. O. Tsvetkov (position of the authorized individual of the joint stock company) (signature) (initials, surname) L.S. “ 06 ” October 20 20 the city of Issuer codes INN (Taxpayer Identificat ion Number) 7707083893 OGRN (Primary State Registrati on Number) 1027700132195 I. Affiliates as of 3 0 0 9 2 0 2 0 Item Full company name (or name for a Address of a legal entity or place of Grounds for recognizing the entity Date on which Interest of the affiliate Percentage of ordinary No. nonprofit entity) or full name (if any) of residence of an individual (to be as an affiliate the grounds in the charter capital of shares of the joint the affiliate indicated only with the consent of became valid the joint stock stock company owned the individual) company, % by the affiliate, % 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory& Practice
    GREATER OPPORTUNITIES. GREATER RESPONSIBILITY. / theory& practice Operational efficiency and sustainability, flexibil- ity and consistency, availability and professional- ism, versatility and competency in the areas of expertise… These are only a few key factors supporting success in the insurance business. The SOGAZ Group success story, as well as its rep- utation and positions in the Russian insurance market prove that the company is fully in position to meet those challenging requirements. SOGAZ meets expectations of its clients, shareholders and partners, thus creating for them an oasis of stability and confidence in the future. annual report for / for 2005 CONTENT ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL /// Pages Pages Pages / Board of Directors / About SOGAZ Group / Cooperation Chairman's Appeal with Gas Industry / SOGAZ Group Members Management Board Group's Business / JSC / Chairman's Appeal / SOGAZ Management Diversification Board Up-to-date Approaches JSC / / SOGAZ Management and Technologies Board / Social Activity / 2005 Key Events and Charities / Activities of SOGAZ Group in 2005 – Main Results theory&practice theory&practice of successful business of better decisions SOGAZ GROUP ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL CHAIRMAN'S APPEAL MANAGEMENT BOARD MANAGEMENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS BOARD CHAIRMAN'S APPEAL AND / Greater Opportunities. Greater Responsibility. SOGAZ GROUP INSURANCE /// Pages Pages Pages JSC / SOGAZ Group / SOGAZ / Contact Information Regional Policy Financial Report / Representatives JSC JSC / Russian Insurance / SOGAZ Profit of SOGAZ Market Development
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of the Fish Industry in Russia October 2005
    SURVEY OF THE FISH INDUSTRY IN RUSSIA OCTOBER 2005 PREPARED BY FOR MINISTRY FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS & MINISTRY OF FISHERIES, ICELAND ii Contents Contents .............................................................................................................................. ii Executive Summary........................................................................................................... iv Mandate and background information............................................................................... ix Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... xi List of abbreviations ........................................................................................................ xii 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Geographic situation........................................................................................... 1 1.2 Population ........................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Economic situation..............................................................................................2 1.4 Political and legal factors.................................................................................... 2 2 FISH INDUSTRY STATISTICS ............................................................................... 4 2.1 Overview of statistical information sources ......................................................
    [Show full text]