DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix J1 EMI EMF Baseline Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

GO Rail Network Electrification TPAP Final ElectromagneticREVIEW OF PARSONS Interference/ElectromagneticPROPOSAL TO UPGRADE TRACK CIRCUITS Fields Baseline Conditions Report For Prepared by: Insert TUV Logo Reviewed by: Gannett Fleming Project No. 060277 Metrolinx Electrification Project Contract No. QBS-2014-IEP-002 Submittal Date: July 2017 Prepared By: Gannett Fleming Canada ULC 8/31/17 i | P a g e METROLINX GO RAIL ELECTRIFICATION Quality Assurance Document Release Form Name of Firm: RSC / TÜV Document Name: GO Transit Rail Network Electrification EA EMC Baseline Conditions Report Rev. 4 Submittal Date: July 18, 2017 Discipline: EMC Prepared By: Wilton D. Alston, TÜV Rheinland Date: July 18, 2017 Reviewed By: Gittens / Fagley, TÜV Rheinland Date: July 18, 2017 Approved By: Wilton D. Alston, TÜV Rheinland Date: July 18, 2017 Project Manager The above electronic signatures indicate that the named document is controlled by Gannett Fleming Canada ULC, and has been: 1. Prepared by qualified staff in accordance with generally accepted professional practice. 2. Checked for completeness and accuracy by the appointed discipline reviewers and that the discipline reviewers did not perform the original work. 3. Reviewed and resolved compatibility interfaces and potential conflicts among the involved disciplines. 4. Updated to address previously agreed-to reviewer comments, including any remaining comments from previous internal or external reviews. 5. Reviewed for conformance to scope and other statutory and regulatory requirements. 6. Determined suitable for submittal by the Project Manager. Prepared By: RSC/TÜV Rev. 4 i | P a g e REVISION HISTORY Revision Date Comments 1 March 11, 2016 Draft Submission to Metrolinx. 2 May 13, 2016 Incorporated revisions and updates 3 October 20, 2016 Incorporated additional comments and updates 4 July 18, 2017 Final Response Version – Final updates Prepared By: RSC/TÜV Rev. 4 ii | P a g e GO Rail Network Electrification TPAP Final Electromagnetic Interference/Electromagnetic Fields Baseline Conditions Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS .............................................................................................2 1.2 SCOPE OF THE PROJECT ...................................................................................................................2 1.3 STUDY AREA .................................................................................................................................2 1.3.1 GO RAIL CORRIDORS ............................................................................................................................. 3 1.3.2 TRACTION POWER FACILITY LOCATIONS .................................................................................................... 4 1.3.3 MODIFICATIONS TO WILLOWBROOK MAINTENANCE FACILITY AND EAST RAIL MAINTENANCE FACILITY .............. 11 1.3.4 MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING LAYOVER FACILITIES .................................................................................... 11 2.1 TAP LOCATIONS ........................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 230KV/55KV/25KV CONNECTION ROUTES....................................................................................... 12 2.3 TRACTION POWER SUBSTATIONS ..................................................................................................... 12 2.4 TRACTION POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ......................................................................................... 12 2.4.1 OVERHEAD CONTACT SYSTEM (OCS) ...................................................................................................... 12 2.4.2 PARALLELING AND SWITCHING STATIONS ................................................................................................ 13 2.4.3 MODIFIED MAINTENANCE FACILITIES ...................................................................................................... 14 2.5 BRIDGE MODIFICATIONS ............................................................................................................... 14 3.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION REVIEW .............................................................................................. 16 3.2 DATA GAP ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................... 17 3.3 APPROACH TO BASELINE DATA COLLECTION – EMI/EMF ...................................................................... 17 3.3.1 EMI BASELINE COLLECTION – BACKGROUND ........................................................................................... 17 3.3.2 BASELINE EMI RECEPTOR MAPPING ....................................................................................................... 18 3.4 APPROACH TO BASELINE DATA COLLECTION – ELF EMF ....................................................................... 21 3.4.1 ELF EMF BASELINE COLLECTION – BACKGROUND .................................................................................... 21 3.4.2 ELF EMF SITE SURVEY PROCEDURE – RAILWAY ROWS ............................................................................. 21 4.1 EMI BASELINE CONDITIONS (EMI SENSITIVE RECEPTORS) ..................................................................... 23 4.1.1 AIRPORTS ........................................................................................................................................... 23 4.1.2 HOSPITALS ......................................................................................................................................... 24 4.1.3 MEDICAL IMAGING FACILITIES ............................................................................................................... 26 4.1.4 HELIPORTS ......................................................................................................................................... 30 4.2 EMF BASELINE CONDITIONS........................................................................................................... 31 4.2.1 TRACTION POWER FACILITY SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 33 4.2.2 UNION STATION RAIL CORRIDOR ............................................................................................................ 35 Prepared By: RSC/TÜV Rev. 4 iii | P a g e GO Rail Network Electrification TPAP Final Electromagnetic Interference/Electromagnetic Fields Baseline Conditions Report 4.2.2.1 SECTION USRC-1 – UP EXPRESS UNION GO STATION TO DON YARD LAYOVER ............................................. 35 4.2.3 LAKESHORE WEST CORRIDOR ................................................................................................................ 46 4.2.3.1 LAKESHORE WEST TRACTION POWER FACILITIES ....................................................................................... 46 4.2.3.2 SECTION LSW-1 – STRACHAN AVENUE TO MIMICO GO STATION ................................................................ 46 4.2.3.3 SECTION LSW-2 – MIMICO GO STATION TO LONG BRANCH GO STATION .................................................... 46 4.2.3.4 SECTION LSW-3 – LONG BRANCH GO STATION TO PORT CREDIT GO STATION ............................................. 47 4.2.3.5 SECTION LSW-4 – PORT CREDIT GO STATION TO CLARKSON GO STATION ................................................... 47 4.2.3.6 SECTION LSW-5 – CLARKSON GO STATION TO OAKVILLE GO STATION ........................................................ 47 4.2.3.7 SECTION LSW-6 – OAKVILLE GO STATION TO BRONTE GO STATION ........................................................... 47 4.2.3.8 SECTION LSW-7 – BRONTE GO STATION TO APPLEBY GO STATION ............................................................. 48 4.2.3.9 SECTION LSW-8 – APPLEBY GO STATION TO BURLINGTON ........................................................................ 49 4.2.4 KITCHENER CORRIDOR .......................................................................................................................... 53 4.2.4.1 KITCHENER TRACTION POWER FACILITY ................................................................................................... 53 4.2.4.2 SECTION KT-1 – UP EXPRESS SPUR (AT HIGHWAY 427) TO MALTON GO STATION ........................................ 53 4.2.4.3 SECTION KT-2 – MALTON GO STATION TO BRAMALEA .............................................................................. 54 4.2.5 BARRIE CORRIDOR ............................................................................................................................... 58 4.2.5.1 BARRIE TRACTION POWER FACILITIES ...................................................................................................... 58 4.2.5.2 SECTION BR-1 – PARKDALE JUNCTION TO CALEDONIA GO STATION ............................................................ 58 4.2.5.3 SECTION BR-2 – CALEDONIA GO STATION TO DOWNSVIEW PARK GO STATION ............................................ 58 4.2.5.4 SECTION BR-3 – DOWNSVIEW PARK GO STATION TO RUTHERFORD GO STATION .......................................... 58 4.2.5.5 SECTION BR-4 – RUTHERFORD GO STATION TO KING CITY GO STATION ...................................................... 59 4.2.5.6 SECTION BR-5 – KING CITY GO STATION TO BATHURST STREET .................................................................. 59 4.2.5.7 SECTION BR-6 – BATHURST STREET TO AURORA GO STATION ...................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Ontario Power Generation: Application to Renew the Licence to Prepare Site for the Darlington New Nuclear Project (DNNP)

    Ontario Power Generation: Application to Renew the Licence to Prepare Site for the Darlington New Nuclear Project (DNNP)

    Ontario Power Generation: Application to Renew the Licence to Prepare Site for the Darlington New Nuclear Project (DNNP) CNSC Staff Presentation Commission Hearing June 10-11, 2021 CMD 21-H4.A e-Doc 6522189 (PPTX) nuclearsafety.gc.ca e-Doc 6569476 (PDF) Ontario Power Generation: Darlington New Nuclear Project Licence Renewal June 10-11, 2021, CMD 21-H4 Presentation Outline • Project Location and History • Assessment of Renewal Application • OPG’s Performance • Other Matters of Regulatory Interest • Proposed Licence • Conclusions • Recommendations 2 nuclearsafety.gc.ca Ontario Power Generation: Darlington New Nuclear Project Licence Renewal June 10-11, 2021, CMD 21-H4 Purpose of Hearing Ontario Power Generation (OPG) is requesting that the Commission: • Renew the DNNP licence to prepare site for a period of 10 years from the date of issuance CNSC staff recommend that the Commission: • Renew the proposed licence, PRSL 18.00/2031 • Authorize delegation of authority as set out in CMD 21-H4 nuclearsafety.gc.ca 3 Ontario Power Generation: Darlington New Nuclear Project Licence Renewal June 10-11, 2021, CMD 21-H4 PROJECT LOCATION AND HISTORY nuclearsafety.gc.ca 4 Ontario Power Generation: Darlington New Nuclear Project Licence Renewal June 10-11, 2021, CMD 21-H4 Existing Darlington Nuclear Generating Station Site Darlington New Nuclear Project (DNNP) Site nuclearsafety.gc.ca 5 Ontario Power Generation: Darlington New Nuclear Project Licence Renewal June 10-11, 2021, CMD 21-H4 CNSC Licence under the Nuclear Safety and Control Act (NSCA) The NSCA
  • City of Toronto: Get Involved

    City of Toronto: Get Involved

    City of Toronto: Get involved http://www.toronto.ca/involved/projects/malvern_lrt/faq.htm Scarborough-Malvern Light Rail Transit (LRT) Transit City Updated of November 13, 2009 Malvern Light Rail in 51 languages Transit Frequently Asked Questions Frequently asked questions General Contact us When is the earliest that construction could start and finish? How will Transit City help Toronto? How is Light Rail Transit (LRT) superior to existing streetcar service in Toronto? What work has been completed since the last round of Open Houses in 2008? What specific transit connections is the LRT aiming to address? Existing Bus Routes What will happen to existing bus routes in the area after the LRT is built / Which routes will be changed or removed? Connections and Service How will a connection be made at Kennedy Station? How does the Scarborough-Malvern LRT relate/connect to the proposed extension of the Scarborough Rapid Transit (SRT)? Are both projects (Malvern and SRT) needed north of Sheppard Avenue? What are the future plans for TTC connections at the Guildwood GO / VIA Rail Station? Could GO / TTC increase parking spots at Guildwood GO/ VIA Rail Station? Could the Eglinton Crosstown LRT and Scarborough-Malvern LRT terminate at Guildwood GO / VIA Rail Station instead of Kennedy Station? How will the Scarborough-Malvern LRT connect with the Kingston Rd transit project? How frequently will vehicles serve the Scarborough-Malvern LRT route? (e.g. every 10 minutes)? Protecting Green Space How will green spaces and trees (Morningside Park) be protected?
  • Pickering Nuclear 2017 Impingement Monitoring Report

    Pickering Nuclear 2017 Impingement Monitoring Report

    Internal Use Only Document Number: Usage Classification: Report P-REP-07263-00011 N/A Sheet Number: Revision Number: Page: N/A R000 1 of 17 Title: PICKERING NUCLEAR 2017 IMPINGEMENT MONITORING REPORT © Ontario Power Generation Inc., 2018. This document has been produced and distributed for Ontario Power Generation Inc. purposes only. No part of this document may be reproduced, published, converted, or stored in any data retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of Ontario Power Generation Inc. Pickering Nuclear 2017 Impingement Monitoring Report P-REP-07263-00011-R000 2018-04-16 Order Number: N/A Other Reference Number: Internal Use Only Prepared By: Jeff Wright Prepared By: Doug Brown Environmental Advisor Environmental Advisor Environment Programs Environment Programs Reviewed By: Concurred By: Vanessa Tang Hon Yue Ali Esmaeily Section Manager Section Manager Environment Ops Support Environment Programs Pickering Approved By: Raphael McCalla Director Environment Ops Support Nuclear N-TMP-10010-R012 (Microsoft® 2007) Internal Use Only Document Number: Usage Classification: Report P-REP-07263-00011 N/A Sheet Number: Revision Number: Page: N/A R000 2 of 17 Title: PICKERING NUCLEAR 2017 IMPINGEMENT MONITORING REPORT Table of Contents Page List of Tables and Figures ............................................................................................................. 3 Revision Summary .......................................................................................................................
  • Tvontario (Tee-Vee-On-Táre-Ee-Oh) N

    Tvontario (Tee-Vee-On-Táre-Ee-Oh) N

    TVOntario (tee-vee-on-táre-ee-oh) n. adjunct to Ontario’s formal education and training systems, on air, online and in print. adj. intelligent; accessible; educational; inspirational. v. increasing self-sufficiency; delivering uncompromising quality. Members make it happen! Annual Report Card 2003–2004 To the Honourable Mary Anne Chambers, Minister of Training, Colleges and Universities, Mandate Queen’s Park I take pleasure in submitting the Annual Report of the Ontario Educational Communications Authority (TVOntario) for the fiscal year April 1, 2003, to March 31, 2004. This is done in accordance with Section 12 (1) of the Ontario Educational Communications Authority Act. TVOntario’s mandate is to serve as an adjunct to the formal education and training This Annual Report outlines the milestones we set and our successes in achieving them for the year systems in Ontario, by using television and 2003–04, during which we delivered to the people of Ontario unique services that support the other communications technologies to Government’s top priority of education, and at the same time increased our financial self- provide high quality educational programs, sufficiency. curriculum resources and distance education courses in English and in French. Through the integration of our broadcast and online technologies, and the commitment and vision of a talented staff, TVOntario provides valuable educational resources and learning experiences In 1970, TVOntario was established as the that fulfill the needs of Ontarians. With our focus on formal educational programming and Ontario Educational Communications resources, diversity, innovation, and self-sufficiency at the core of our day-to-day operations, there Authority.
  • 2018 ONTARIO Budget for General Inquiries Regarding 2018 Ontario Budget: Budget Papers, Please Call

    2018 ONTARIO Budget for General Inquiries Regarding 2018 Ontario Budget: Budget Papers, Please Call

    2018 ONTARIO BUDGE 2018 ONTARIO A PLAN FOR CARE AND OPPORTUNITY RX C. Lee RX T THE HONOURABLE CHARLES SOUSA MINISTER OF FINANCE 2018 ONTARIO BUDGET BUDGET PAPERS For general inquiries regarding 2018 Ontario Budget: Budget Papers, please call: Toll-free English and French inquiries: 1-800-337-7222 Teletypewriter (TTY): 1-800-263-7776 For electronic copies of this document, visit our website at www.ontario.ca/budget A printed copy of this publication can be ordered: Online: www.serviceontario.ca/publications By phone: ServiceOntario Contact Centre (Monday to Friday, 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM) Telephone: 416-326-5300 TTY: 416-325-3408 Toll-free across Canada: 1-800-668-9938 TTY Toll-free across Ontario: 1-800-268-7095 © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2018 ISBN 978-1-4868-1883-9 (Print) ISBN 978-1-4868-1884-6 (HTML) ISBN 978-1-4868-1885-3 (PDF) Ce document est disponible en français sous le titre : Budget de l’Ontario 2018 – Documents budgétaires Foreword A Plan for Care and Opportunity Ontario’s economy is performing well. This is largely due to the businesses and entrepreneurs who create jobs and to the women and men who get up each morning to go to the plant, or the office, or another place of work to make Ontario a more prosperous province. At the same time, the government has made strategic investments to support growth. Enhanced education, skills and training, new infrastructure, a competitive business environment and support for startups and small businesses are helping create good jobs. On the surface, the numbers tell a positive story: Our economy has outperformed those of all G7 nations since 2014; Our unemployment rate, at 5.5 per cent, is the lowest it has been in almost 20 years; and Last year alone, 500 net new jobs were created, on average, each day in Ontario, and they were mostly full‐time.
  • DS-20-60 City Comments on Metrolinx's Draft Environmental Project Report for the New Track and Facilities Project

    DS-20-60 City Comments on Metrolinx's Draft Environmental Project Report for the New Track and Facilities Project

    Public Report To: Development Services Committee From: Warren Munro, HBA, RPP, Commissioner, Development Services Department Report Number: DS-20-60 Date of Report: June 3, 2020 Date of Meeting: June 8, 2020 Subject: City Comments on Metrolinx’s Draft Environmental Project Report for the New Track and Facilities Project File: B-7000-0020 1.0 Purpose The purpose of this report is to: a) Provide a high level overview of the information contained in Metrolinx’s Draft Environmental Project Report (“Draft E.P.R.”) for the New Track and Facilities Transit Project Assessment Process (T.P.A.P.); b) Highlight the information provided in the Draft E.P.R. that is specific to the work proposed in the City of Oshawa at the Oshawa GO Station at 915 Bloor Street West; and, c) Obtain Council’s approval of City comments on Metrolinx’s Draft E.P.R. for the New Track and Facilities T.P.A.P. Metrolinx has requested that comments on the Draft E.P.R. for the New Track and Facilities T.P.A.P. be submitted by May 29, 2020. However, City staff have confirmed with staff at Metrolinx that the submission of City comments after the requested deadline is acceptable and appropriate, in order that staff’s comments may be considered by the Development Services Committee at its regularly scheduled meeting of June 8, 2020 and submitted to Metrolinx for consideration, followed by the subsequent related resolution of Council. Attachment 1 is a copy of a letter erroneously dated April 27, 2019 and received in May of 2020, from Metrolinx providing a high-level overview of the information in the Draft E.P.R.
  • New Track and Facilities

    New Track and Facilities

    Public Meeting #1 Welcome to the GO Expansion OnCorridor Program GO Expansion – New Track & Facilities TPAP Scan here to visit project site Proposed Layover & Train Storage Additional layover/storage yard facilities are required to accommodate service expansion. Layover/storage yards are strategically located throughout the rail network. Layover and storage facilities are necessary to achieve the targeted GO Expansion service levels by: • Reducing long-distance non-revenue trips. 3 • Accommodating train storage during off-peak hours. • Allowing trains to be routinely serviced and cleaned. Train Wash Facility • Providing flexibility for trains to operate more seamlessly across the network. A structure for cleaning the 4 5 exterior of trains, similar to a 2 drive-thru car wash. Progressive Maintenance Facility • A sheltered 400 metre long garage for train maintenance. 1 Exterior Interior Example of the Willowbrook Layover Facility, City of Toronto Layovers Facilities typically include: 3) Waste Management 1) Train Storage 4) Crew Services 2) Cleaning and Servicing 5) Track, Switches and Utilities Lincolnville Layover Facility GO Expansion – New Track & Facilities TPAP Scan here to visit project site Proposed Beach Layover Facility - City of Burlington To meet increasing service levels, the Beach Layover Facility is required for: • Storing trains during the day and night. • Reducing rail congestion on the Lakeshore West Corridor. • Serving as the terminus of electrification of the corridor. Existing Site Proposed Site Design Elements: Surrounding
  • (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016

    (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016

    Bolton Residential Expansion Study (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016 The purpose of this memorandum is to review the professional literature pertaining to the potential develop- ment of a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in the Bolton Residential Expansion Study area, in response to the Region of Peel’s recent release of the Discussion Paper. The Discussion Paper includes the establishment of evaluation themes and criteria, which are based on provincial and regional polices, stakeholder and public comments. It should be noted that while the Discussion Paper and the Region’s development of criteria does not specifi- cally advocate for TOD, it is the intent of this memorandum to illustrate that TOD-centric planning will not only adequately address such criteria, but will also complement and enhance the Region’s planning principles, key points and/or themes found in stakeholder and public comments. In the following are research findings related to TOD generally, and specifically, theMetrolinx Mobility Hub Guidelines For The Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (September 2011) objectives. Additionally, following a review and assessment of the “Response to Comments Submitted on the Bolton Residential Expansion Study ROPA” submission prepared by SGL Planning & Design Inc. (March 15, 2016), this memorandum evaluates some of the key arguments and assumptions made in this submission relative to the TOD research findings. Planning for Transit-Oriented Developments TOD policy and programs can result in catalytic development that creates walkable, livable neighborhoods around transit providing economic, livability and equitable benefits. The body of research on TODs in the United States has shown that TODs are more likely to succeed when project planning takes place in conjunction with transit system expansion.
  • Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report 2016

    Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report 2016

    Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the efforts of former Metrolinx Accessibility Advisory Committee (AAC) members Mr. Sean Henry and Mr. Brian Moore, both of whom stepped down from the AAC in 2016. They provided valuable input into our accessibility planning efforts. We would like to welcome Mr. Gordon Ryall and Ms. Heather Willis, who both joined the Metrolinx AAC in 2015. Lastly, we would like to thank all of the Metrolinx AAC members for the important work they do as volunteers to improve the accessibility of our services. Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report: 2016 1. Introduction The 2016 Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report provides an annual update of the Metrolinx Multi-Year Accessibility Plan published in December 2012, as well as the 2015 Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report. Metrolinx, a Crown agency of the Province of Ontario under the responsibility of the Ministry of Transportation, has three operating divisions: GO Transit, PRESTO and Union Pearson Express. This Status Report, in conjunction with the December 2012 Metrolinx Multi-Year Accessibility Plan, fulfills Metrolinx’s legal obligations for 2016 under the Ontarians with Disabilities Act (ODA), to publish an annual accessibility plan; and also under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), to publish an annual status report on its multi-year plan. The December 2012 Metrolinx Multi-Year Accessibility Plan and other accessibility planning documents can be referenced on the Metrolinx website at the following link: www.metrolinx.com/en/aboutus/accessibility/default.aspx. In accordance with the AODA, it must be updated every five years. Metrolinx, including its operating divisions, remains committed to proceeding with plans to ensure AODA compliance.
  • Highway 7 East 6950 Mixed Use High Rise Development Opportunity Markham, Ontario Sold

    Highway 7 East 6950 Mixed Use High Rise Development Opportunity Markham, Ontario Sold

    6910 HIGHWAY 7 EAST 6950 MIXED USE HIGH RISE DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY MARKHAM, ONTARIO SOLD MARKHAM STOUFFVILLE HOSPITAL CORNELL BUS NINTH LINE TERMINAL HIGHWAY 7 VIEW PROPERTY VIDEO MARKHAM ROAD NINTH LINE CORNELL BUS MARKHAM STOUFFVILLE TERMINAL HOSPITAL CHURCH STREET HIGHWAY 407 HIGHWAY 7 E VENU BUR OAK A CORNELL CENTRE BOULEVARD 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 THE OFFERING 7 RIVERLANDS AVENUE PLANNING CONTEXT RUSTLE WOODS AVENUE WILLIAM FOSTER ROAD 9 TRANSIT & AMENITIES 11 NEARBY DEVELOPMENTS 11 OFFERING PROCESS CONTACT INFORMATION THE OFFERING CITY OF MARKHAM - POPULATION CBRE Limited is pleased to offer for sale under Court Order 6910 & 6950 Highway 7 East in Markham 2016 337,800 (the “Site”). This + 19.65 ac. Site is located within the City of Markham’s Intensification Area as defined in the City’s Official Plan, and is also within the Cornell 2021** 370,300 Centre Secondary Plan boundary. The Secondary Plan builds policy framework for a regional corridor 2026** 398,300 and key development area centered on the Highway 7 rapid transit corridor and higher density mixed- use communities. The City is currently finalizing the 2031** 421,600 Secondary Plan. The area immediately surrounding the Site is undergoing many developments, such as the **Population projection Markham Stouffville Hospital that underwent a major expansion in 2014 which doubled its size, and the construction of Cornell Bus Terminal with 11 bays for VIVA, York Regional Transit, GO and Durham Regional MARKHAM STOUFFVILLE Transit buses. This new transit hub is anticipated to NINTH LINE HOSPITAL be operating in late 2019. New houses and multiple Markham CHURCH STREET condominium developments have been built or are still under-construction in the surrounding area.
  • Upper Canada Railway Society

    Upper Canada Railway Society

    INCORPORATED 1952 NUMBER 478 AUGUST 1989 TT\ Cr^uvjit : t ^ i>T. • \ ' , • ^ yd ;'.:-t-;"^ ' ( UPPER CANADA RAILWAY SOCIETY BOX 122 STATION "A" TORONTO, ONTARIO Former CPR business car 2, still in its original maroon paint and gold lettering, is pictured near the site of Leaside Station, Toronto, on July 15, 1989. It rests on a section of new track, slightly over two car lengths long, laid beside the main line but not connected. The car will be available for rent for meetings and other gatherings. It will be repainted in its CPR colours. Thompson The first TTC PCC, .A-1 class 4000, is loaded aboard a truck at Hillcrest Yard on June 21, 1989, for its return to the Rockwood streetcar museum. The car was in the Harvey Shop after being-displayed at the 1988 CNE for the 50th anniversary of PCCs in Toronto. p Thomp.son On July 31, 1989, TTC track crews were busy laying track on Spadina Ave. north from Lakeshore Rd., leading up to the new bridge over the railway tracks. The tracks will be in a raised concrete reservation, similar to the one on Oueens Quay. This view looks northwest from the abandoned CNR High Line embankment . , , „ „, --John D. Thompson , August 1989 UGRS Newsletter 3 Observations from a former Montreal commuter By Bob Sandusky . Vacationing near Dorion, Quebec for a few days in July cartwheel past my eyes. A teen-aged commuter had disembarked provided an opportunity to revisit a few haunts from my CP before his time, with spectacular results but no injury except to ', Lakeshore commuting days of 1965 to 1973.
  • GO Train Lakeshore East Extension Through Central Oshawa to Bowmanville

    GO Train Lakeshore East Extension Through Central Oshawa to Bowmanville

    GO Train Lakeshore East Extension through Central Oshawa to Bowmanville Economic Impact Analysis April 2016 GO Train Lakeshore East Extension through Central Oshawa to Bowmanville Economic Impact Analysis Prepared for: dLAB, City of Oshawa, Municipality of Clarington and Community Partners Prepared by: Arup Suite 2400, 2 Bloor Street East, Toronto Ontario M4W 1A8 Phone: (416) 515-0915 [email protected] arup.com & Altus Group Economic Consulting 33 Yonge Street Toronto Ontario M5E 1G4 Phone: (416) 641-9500 Fax: (416) 641-9501 [email protected] altusgroup.com April 2016 April 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background ..............................................................................3 1.2 Approach .................................................................................6 2 ECONOMIC OVERVIEW ....................................................................... 10 2.1 Employment Growth ...........................................................11 2.2 Population Growth ...............................................................17 2.3 Conclusions ...........................................................................24 3 COMMUNITY ECONOMIC IMPACT OF GO LAKESHORE EAST EXTENSION .............................................................................................. 26 3.1 Improved Access to Labour, Markets and Clients ...........26 3.2 Benefits to Post Secondary Institutions .............................28