Congressional Record—Senate S129

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congressional Record—Senate S129 January 22, 2004 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S129 in the majority or minority, Democrat chairman and ranking member of the of both bodies on this matter. It is in- or Republican, liberal or conservative, Appropriations Committee or their des- credibly difficult for me to understand we ought to be concerned when some ignee for debate only. why we are moving forward with this small group of people, in the dark of Who seeks recognition? The Senator bill when we have something that night, overturn legitimate public roll- from New Jersey. strikes at the heart of what it is we call decisions made by this body. We Mr. CORZINE. Mr. President, I yield value in this country. Work ought to ought to be concerned about that be- myself about 10 minutes, if that is ap- be something that is rewarded. It cause I think it is an erosion of democ- propriate. ought to be recognized. It has been a racy in our Republic that is deplorable, The PRESIDENT pro tempore. With- part of the consensus we have in this deplorable. How many more times is it out objection, it is so ordered. country. Obviously, it is broadly con- going to happen? How does it render Mr. CORZINE. I thank the Chair. ceived as being the right thing by the the Senate, this so-called deliberative First of all, I want to speak today majority of folks in both houses and on body, when we can deliberate, make about this appropriations bill that is both sides of the aisle. I have grave dif- tough decisions here on the Senate now on the floor. I have serious ambiv- ficulty understanding this. It goes to floor, only to be overturned? What does alence about how we should deal with the fundamental essence of how our it say? the specifics of this measure. I know economy works. Work ought to be val- With regard to the issues themselves members of the Appropriations Com- ued at least the same as capital in this I will say this: I said a couple of days mittee, led by the Presiding Officer, society. ago this is the beginning. It was not have worked long and hard. They have Here we are turning our backs on it. our desire to shut the Government worked in a fair way to try to make We are sending the wrong signal to our down, to block this bill ultimately. We sure they put together the best final kids, and to society in general. It is a wanted to give our Republican col- product they can, have been sensitive big mistake, in my view—so big that I leagues a chance to fix it. They have to the needs of their colleagues, and think it actually compromises the chosen not to fix any of these issues. have worked to try to be balanced value of the overall piece of legislation. But we will be back. We must be back. about how they brought forth this final Second, I have serious concerns We will continue to offer amendments product. Unfortunately, through the about media concentration. Of course, on whatever vehicle is presented to us. conference process, a product has a lot of us do not often like things that We are now preparing Congressional emerged that differs from that sought are said in the media. We don’t like Review Act resolutions. The legislative by our leaders here in the Senate. that to-and-fro which impacts us indi- veto is available to us on some of these It is with some ambivalence that I vidually. But society is better by it. It matters and we will use it. feel the need to express some of the is a lot better when we have a healthy So we will be back again and again. reasons why I will not be supporting debate of ideas and different view- These issues will not go away. We will the Omnibus appropriations bill for points come out. That is what democ- continue to fight and we will continue 2004. It contains what I believe are seri- racy is about. to work, first, because we care about ous policy flaws that, furthermore, The last time I checked, both sides of the institution but, second, because we don’t deal actually with the appropria- this body supported the media con- care about these policies. tions process. They go far beyond what centration rule at 35 percent. And So, Mr. President, it is with great should be addressed, debated and con- somehow we have a different rule than concern—chagrin, that we find our- cluded in the democratic forum of this what was agreed to by both houses. I selves in a position today that I wish Senate, and in the House. heard the distinguished minority lead- had never presented itself to this body. It seems to me that the most serious er speak to the essence of the institu- We will have a vote on cloture. We problem here is not even those policies, tion, and the institution is broader— may have a vote on final passage. But although they are very important in not just the Senate but the Senate and it will not be the last vote on these and of themselves, but this process the House. How can we reach agree- issues. that has somehow overturned the poli- ments on things and then come out I hope in the interest of this institu- cies supported by wide majorities in with a different result on something as tion we will learn the hard lessons that both houses, policies we worked so long important as how we communicate these specific problems have created and hard to deal with—I think this with the public in this country? How do for each of us. process is out of kilter. we change the dynamics of political de- I yield the floor. But I also believe that, at a policy bate and news coverage on which the level, they are important, things such people rely to fulfill their civic duty f as overtime. It is just hard to believe and gather information to make deci- RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME when we can pass a dividend and cap- sions, such as who they are going to The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under ital gains tax cut to help those who are support? How will they make informed the previous order, leadership time is already doing well to improve wealth, decisions when we have this concentra- reserved. and, to put it in economic terms, to re- tion? It is an incredibly difficult con- ward capital, we are turning our backs f cept for me to understand. on labor and on work. We don’t raise a lot of cows in New AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOP- I don’t mean labor in an organized Jersey, but we eat a lot of meat. I don’t MENT, FOOD AND DRUG ADMIN- sense. I mean our workforce, the people understand the country-of-origin label- ISTRATION, AND RELATED who work. It seems to me that people ing issue. Why would we not take the AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS who work should have at least the steps that are necessary to protect the ACT, 2004—CONFERENCE REPORT same value attested to their efforts as American people and to protect the The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under people who invest. Here we are talking country’s economic interests so we can the previous order, the Senate will re- about 8 million people who will come keep the export markets open? This is sume consideration of the conference off these rolls of potential overtime not fundamentally sound on either the report to accompany H.R. 2673, which benefits. For what reason? For what safety of the public or our own eco- the clerk will report. reason are we doing this when we want nomic security. Why are we trying to The legislative clerk read as follows: to reinforce the work ethic in this cut jobs in this country? It is bad A conference report to accompany H.R. country? And these are the people who enough that we are cutting overtime. 2673, making appropriations for Agriculture, have modest to middle-income posi- Now we are undermining our ability to Rural Development, Food and Drug Adminis- tions in our society. actually be effective in the global mar- tration, and related agencies for the fiscal It is extraordinarily difficult to un- ket because we are making policy that year ending September 30, 2004, and for other derstand this decision when you con- reflects a narrow interest as opposed to purposes. sider the context that both this Senate the public’s interests and the broader The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under and the House of Representatives have economic interests of the country. the previous order, there will be 41⁄2 opposed changes to our overtime rules. It is hard to understand at a period in hours equally divided between the This bill is a turnaround from the will time when we are down 2.3 million jobs VerDate Mar 15 2010 22:20 Jan 29, 2014 Jkt 081600 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4637 Sfmt 0634 E:\2004SENATE\S22JA4.REC S22JA4 mmaher on DSKCGSP4G1 with SOCIALSECURITY S130 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE January 22, 2004 in less than 3 years, where there hasn’t whatever he wants? Whether this ment indicated, it is entirely possible a been the kind of growth in economic passes or not, the President can do vote on the cloture motion will occur reality of people’s lives—that is, going whatever he wants; is the Senator before 2 p.m.
Recommended publications
  • Setting a New Course in Native American Protest Movements: the Menominee Warrior Society’S Takeover of the Alexian Brothers Novitiate in 1975
    Setting a New Course in Native American Protest Movements: The Menominee Warrior Society’s Takeover of the Alexian Brothers Novitiate in 1975 Rachel Lavender Capstone Advisor: Dr. Patricia Turner Cooperating Professors: Dr. Andrew Sturtevant and Dr. Heather Ann Moody History 489 December, 2017 Copyright for this work is owned by the author. This digital version is published by McIntyre Library, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire with the consent of the author. Table of Contents Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………….. Pg. 1 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………. Pg. 2 Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………………. Pg. 3 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………... Pg. 4 Secondary Literature……………………………………………………………………. Pg. 7 Long Term Causes: Menominee Termination and D.R.U.M.S…………..…………….. Pg. 14 Trigger………………………………………………………………………………….. Pg. 20 The Takeover: A Collision of Tactics Ada Deer and Legislative Change……………………………………………… Pg. 22 The Menominee Warrior Society and Direct Action…………………………… Pg. 27 After Gresham: Conclusion…………………………………………………………….. Pg. 30 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………. Pg. 35 1 Abstract Abstract: In the 1960s and 1970s, the United States experienced multiple Native American protest movements. These movements came from two different methods of protest: direct action, or grassroots tactics, and long-term political strategies.. The first method, grassroots tactics, was exemplified by groups such as the American Indian Movement and the Menominee Warrior Society. The occupations of Alcatraz Wounded Knee and the BIA, as well as the takeover of the Alexian Brothers Novitiate all represented the use of grassroots tactics. The second method of protest was that of peaceful change through legislation, or political strategies. The D.R.U.M.S. movement, the Menominee Restoration Committee and the political activism of Ada Deer all represented the use of political strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Menominee Termination and Restoration- an Overview
    Menominee Termination And Restoration- An Overview Termination was a program championed by many federal policy makers between the late 1940s and early 1960s. The goal of termination was to end Indian tribes' status as sovereign nations. The program was, in some sense, a step backward in U.S. Indian policy because during the 1930s the Commissioner of Indian affairs, John Collier, wanted to empower Indians and end blatantly racist policies the United States had instituted throughout its history. The crowning achievement of his Collier's tenure was the 1934 Indian Reorganization Act (IRA). The IRA became the centerpiece of what Collier called the "Indian New Deal," and explicitly recognized and encouraged Indian tribes as sovereign nations. IRA allowed Indian communities to write constitutions and organize tribal governments to govern their own internal affairs. Despite this, many congressmen and federal bureaucrats disagreed with Collier's program. Prior to Collier, the United States encouraged Indians to give up their cultures and live like "civilized" Whites. Collier left office in 1945, and his departure led these new reformers to feel they could reverse his policies and finish assimilating Indians into American mainstream society. The new reformers' program had many parallels to programs which had existed before Collier, but there were also differences. Reformers of the post-1945 era did not talk about "civilizing" the Indians but spoke instead of "freeing" and "emancipating" Indians from federal control. Goals of Termination Their program had four key goals: • Repealing laws that discriminated against Indians and gave them a different status from other Americans; • Disbanding the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and transferring its duties to other federal and state agencies or to tribes themselves; • Ending federal supervision of individual Indians; • Ending federal supervision and trust responsibilities for Indian tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • NARF Legal Review 29-2
    NativeNative AmericanAmerican RightsRights FundFund Regionalization By Any Other Name is Termination Thirty-four years ago, in are responsible for oper- a Special Message on ating them. Regionalization By Any Other Name is Indian Affairs, President Termination .............................. page 1 With those words Nixon stated: President Nixon repudiated It is long past time CASE UPDATES the prior federal policy era that the Indian policies Court in Landmark Cobell v. Norton of termination and ushered of the Federal govern- Indian Trust Suit Rules Department of in the new federal policy of ment began to recognize the Interior Must Provide Detailed Indian self-determination. Notification of Rights ............ page 8 and build upon the But recent legislative devel- capacities and insights CALLING TRIBES TO ACTION! opments reject the tenet of of the Indian people. .................................................... page 9 tribal self-determination as Both as a matter of jus- applied to Alaska tribes and tice and as a matter of Indian Law Library .................. page 10 threaten to eliminate the enlightened social poli- sovereign status of tribes cy, we must begin to act in Alaska altogether. This on the basis of what the process is being done under Indians themselves have long been telling the guise of “regionalization” of tribal funding us. The time has come to break decisively sources and is being systematically carried out with the past and to create the conditions through riders to appropriations bills. Attached for a new era in which the Indian future to the FY 04 Consolidated Spending Bill (Sec. is determined by Indian acts and Indian 112 of HR 2673) were legislative riders that decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Termination and Restoration in Oregon by Donald Fixico
    Termination and Restoration in Oregon By Donald Fixico Of the federal-Indian policies introduced to American Indians, termination of trust relations in the 1950s was arguably the most dangerous for Native peoples. On a case-by-case basis, termination threatened to end the trust relationship the U.S. government had with tribes, bands, communities, and individuals who possessed trust lands or properties, thereby giving Indians the same status as all other American citi- zens. It meant that they owned land or property without the federal protective responsibilities that were guaranteed them in the 374 United States-Indian treaties that were negotiated and ratified between 1778 and 1871. Termination stripped Indians of their identity, a part of the process to assimilate them into the mainstream American culture. The roots of termination date to World War II, when more than 25,000 Indians served in the armed ser- vices, including several hundred women. In the aftermath of the war, some bureaucrats decided it was time to change federal policy to once and for all free Native people from U.S. guardianship and pater- nalism. The Cold War was just beginning, and many American politicians believed it was important to protect conservative democratic values against anything that might be considered un-American. Indian ways of life and communal cultures on reservations ran counter to President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s po- litical philosophy and the perceived threat of Communism. At the same time, racism in America targeted Indians and other minorities,
    [Show full text]
  • American Indian Studies in Wisconsin and United States
    American Indian Studies in Wisconsin and United States TEACHER RESOURCE GUIDE DEVELOPED FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT OF JANESVILLE, WI Allies of Native Nations Committee DIVERSITY ACTION TEAM OF ROCK COUNTY |LAST UPDATED: 11/1/2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 General Resources: .................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Wisconsin-Based Overview of Act 31............................................................................................................................................ 4 Wisconsin Resources ........................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Midwest Resources .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 American Indian Overview resources ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Evaluating American Indian Materials...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Clinton's Legacy on Indigenous Issues
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications Jepson School of Leadership Studies 2001 Clinton's Legacy on Indigenous Issues David E. Wilkins University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/jepson-faculty-publications Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, and the Leadership Studies Commons Recommended Citation Wilkins, David E. “Clinton’s Legacy on Indigenous Issues.” News from Indian Country 15, no. 1 (January 2001): 18A. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Jepson School of Leadership Studies at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Clinton's legacy on Indigenous issues Wilkins, David . News from Indian Country ; Hayward, Wis. [Hayward, Wis]15 Jan 2001: 18A. ABSTRACT (ABSTRACT) The president, of course, has not express constitutional responsibility for Indian nations - that is a power reserved to the Congress under the commerce clause. Nevertheless, it is to the president, dating back to George Washington, who had an active hand in Indian affairs through the treaty process, that tribal nations and their leaders have most often looked to gauge the federal government's character and commitment to fulfill the nation's historic treaty and ongoing trust obligations to indigenous people. [Clinton]'s appointment of Bruce Babbitt, the former governor of Arizona, home to twenty-one reservations, to be the Secretary of the Interior, and Ada Deer, a Menominee Indian leader, and the first Indian woman to serve as the Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs, were generally viewed as positive appointments throughout Indian Country.
    [Show full text]
  • The Menominee Struggle to Maintain Their Tribal Assets and Protect Their Treaty Rights Following Termination
    North Dakota Law Review Volume 51 Number 1 Article 6 1974 The Menominee Struggle to Maintain Their Tribal Assets and Protect Their Treaty Rights following Termination Joseph F. Preloznik Steven Felsenthal Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Preloznik, Joseph F. and Felsenthal, Steven (1974) "The Menominee Struggle to Maintain Their Tribal Assets and Protect Their Treaty Rights following Termination," North Dakota Law Review: Vol. 51 : No. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr/vol51/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Dakota Law Review by an authorized editor of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE MENOMINEE STRUGGLE TO MAINTAIN THEIR TRIBAL ASSETS AND PROTECT THEIR TREATY RIGHTS FOLLOWING TERMINATION JOSEPH F. PRELOZNIK* STEVEN FELSENTHAL * * I. INTRODUCTION The termination policy" enabled Congress to eliminate federal fiduciary responsibility over Native Americans. However, for the undesirous and unprepared Indian, this same termination policy pro- duced a "termination psychosis": a demoralization and anxiety among terminated and nonterminated Indians who experienced either directly or by threat of application forced cultural disintegration by operation of federal decree. For the Menominee Tribe of Wisconsin termination has exhausted their tribal treasury, opened their
    [Show full text]
  • Inspirational Leadership Curriculum for Grades 8-12
    The National Native American Hall of Fame recognizes and honors the inspirational achievements of Native Americans in contemporary history For Teachers This Native American biography-based curriculum is designed for use by teachers of grade levels 8-12 throughout the nation, as it meets national content standards in the areas of literacy, social studies, health, science, and art. The lessons in this curriculum are meant to introduce students to noteworthy individuals who have been inducted into the National Native American Hall of Fame. Students are meant to become inspired to learn more about the National Native American Hall of Fame and the remarkable lives and contributions of its inductees. Shane Doyle, EdD From the CEO We, at the National Native American Hall of Fame are excited and proud to present our “Inspirational Leadership” education curriculum. Developing educational lesson plans about each of our Hall of Fame inductees is one of our organization’s key objectives. We feel that in order to make Native Americans more visible, we need to start in our schools. Each of the lesson plans provide educators with great information and resources, while offering inspiration and role models to students. We are very grateful to our supporters who have funded the work that has made this curriculum possible. These funders include: Northwest Area Foundation First Interstate Bank Foundation NoVo Foundation Dennis and Phyllis Washington Foundation Foundation for Community Vitality O.P. and W.E. Edwards Foundation Tides Foundation Humanities Montana National Endowment for the Humanities Chi Miigwech! James Parker Shield Watch our 11-minute introduction to the National Native American Hall of Fame “Inspirational Leadership Curriculum” featuring Shane Doyle and James Parker Shield at https://vimeo.com/474797515 The interview is also accessible by scanning the Quick Response (QR) code with a smartphone or QR Reader.
    [Show full text]
  • The Women of Drums and the Struggle for Menominee Restoration
    THE WOMEN OF DRUMS AND THE STRUGGLE FOR MENOMINEE RESTORATION Ethan W. Bowers A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2015 Committee: Nicole M. Jackson, Advisor Andrea Riley-Mukavetz ii ABSTRACT Nicole M. Jackson, Advisor During the 1950s and 1960s the Menominee were casualties of the Federal Termination Policy; stripped of all ties to the U.S. government, the Menominee people, economy, and environment suffered great consequences. In 1970, Determination of Rights and Unity for Menominee Shareholders (DRUMS) emerged as an activist organization in opposition to Termination and the Menominee governing elite controlling Menominee Enterprises Inc. (MEI), the tribe’s political voice, and its assets. In similar fashion to the American Indian Movement (AIM), DRUMS protested, published newsletters, and spoke out against MEI. In contrast to AIM, DRUMS struggled for cultural preservation through reform of federal policy and was lead primarily by women. Three women: Ada Deer, Sylvia Wilber, and Shirley Daly aided in devising and executing a diplomatic strategy of federal lobbying, democratic election, and public protest. DRUMS formed inter-organizational linkages, and infiltrated institutional establishments to affect change through democratically representative channels. Research of extensive primary material available on this subject including news clippings, meeting minutes, financial documents, legislative studies, personal correspondence, and referendums, confirms that DRUMS, while similar to AIM, was composed of a distinct grassroots demographic of women who re-constructed methods of resistance utilized by the dominant society to ensure survivance. Furthermore, evidence should explicate DRUMS as a noteworthy activist group led publicly and politically by women such as Ada Deer, Sylvia Wilber, and Shirley Daly, and that the women of DRUMS deserve credit for their contribution to the end of the termination era in federal Indian policy in the 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • A Native American Leaders' Forum Sandra Lee Nowack
    American Indian Law Review Volume 18 | Number 2 1-1-1993 So That You Will Hear Us: A Native American Leaders' Forum Sandra Lee Nowack Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/ailr Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation Sandra L. Nowack, So That You Will Hear Us: A Native American Leaders' Forum, 18 Am. Indian L. Rev. 551 (2018), https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/ailr/vol18/iss2/8 This Special Feature is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPECIAL FEATURES SO THAT YOU WILL HEAR US: A NATIVE AMERICAN LEADERS' FORUM Compiled by Sandra Lee Nowack On July 15, 1993, in a confirmation statement before the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, Assistant Secretary Ada E. Deer shared her hopes for a "progressive federal/tribal partnership" during her tenure with the Bureau of Indian Affairs. In this feature, the American Indian Law Review presents a written forum in which Native American leaders communicate with Assistant Secretary Deer, and with the Native American legal communi- ty. The forum serves as a voice - a shared voice of Indian leaders, expressing their views of the crucial issues facing the Bureau of Indian Affairs today. Table of Contents I. Confirmation Statement of Ada E. Deer Before the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, July 15, 1993 i1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ada E. Deer DEMOCRAT for SECRETARY of STATE
    Ada E. Deer DEMOCRAT FOR SECRETARY OF STATE ••'•••.••.••••'• A Truly Distinguished Wisconsin Native A RECORD OF SERVICE Ada Deer's exceptional abilities and personal effectiveness are reflected in her extensive record of public service. She has been a member of the national boards of Common Cause and the Girl Scouts of America, served on Congressional Commissions on the Mental Health of Children and American Indian Policy Review. Currently she is a member of the President's Commission on White House Fellows and serves on the national boards of •Jf National Association of Social Workers (Minority Committee) •#• Americans for Indian Opportunity •& American Indian Scholarships •X- Council on Foundations ADA DEER. A RECORD A Record of Leadership As both Vice President and Congressional OF ACCOMPLISHMENT liaison of the National Committee to Save the A woman of remarkable achievements, Ada was Menominee People and Forest, Ada played a key born on the Menominee Indian Reservation and role in the Menominee Restoration — a victory graduated from Shawano High School. Ada's dis­ which reversed the federal government's existing tinctions include: policy toward Native Americans. •)(• The First Menominee to graduate Following this victory for tribal self-rule, Ada from UW-Madison(1957) was elected Chairperson of the Menominee Res­ toration Committee, drafted a Tribal Constitution •)(• Master of Social Work, and By-Laws, and prepared the Menominee Columbia University, Nation for the resumption of self-rule over their Reservation for the first time since 1954. •%• Outstanding Young Woman of America, 1966 Today she teaches in the School of Social Work and Native American Studies program at UW- •)(• Honorary Doctorates from the Madison.
    [Show full text]
  • Miisaninawiind :: Manidoo-Giizis :: Jan 27-Feb 2 2020
    Miisaninawiind :: Manidoo-Giizis :: Jan 27-Feb 2 2020 Resources Heritage and Culture Directory Tourism Job Opportunities Divisions Boozhoo and welcome to the Miisaninawiind weekly newsletter! The Miisaniinawind brings you important news, announcements and updates, designed specifically for the Red Cliff community. But that's not all. The weekly eNewsletter will also provide news about neighboring tribes, communities and broader issues across Indian Country that matter to you. If you have photos, news or information you'd like to share, please email submissions to [email protected]. Check our Facebook page HERE and our website HERE. We are working on a new website and can't wait to share it with you! Want to receive the newsletter each week? Sign up HERE. Click HERE to view this email as a webpage instead. News & Updates Community Meet and Greet with Tricia Zunker February 3 @ 3:00 PM, Legendary Waters All are invited to meet and speak with Tricia Zunker of Ho-Chunk Nation as she runs for congress to be a voice for the people of northwest Wisconsin. Zunker seeks to take the Wisconsin 7th congressional district seat in a special election after the departure of Sean Duffy. She previously visited Red Cliff in January to meet with Tribal Administration regarding the issues facing our community and how she can help us overcome these issues if she were to be elected to Congress. Zunker expressed the importance of community members getting out to vote in the upcoming primary and special elections. The primary will be held on February 18. The special election will be held on May 12.
    [Show full text]