DOCSLIB.ORG

MORT NO Senate-91-405- PUB DATE 77 NOTE 244P.: Paper Copy Not Available Due to Small Print Size

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MORT NO Senate-91-405- PUB DATE 77 NOTE 244P.: Paper Copy Not Available Due to Small Print Size DOCUMENT RESUME . -11-0 190 306 lac 01.2 154 TITLE. Meetings of the American Indian Policy Review Commission (March 5, May 2, June 13, July 11, and September 12, 1975). Volume 1. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C.Senate Select Committee on Indian Affairs. MORT NO Senate-91-405- PUB DATE 77 NOTE 244p.: Paper copy not available due to small print size. For related documents, see RC 012 155-159: EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage.. PC Not Available from EDRS. 0 DESCRIPTORS *American Indiansv'Change Agents; *Change Strategies: *Federal Indian Relationship: *Go*/ernment Role: Hearings: Management by Objectives; Nonreservation American Indians: Objectives: Personnel Selection: Policyr Reservation American Indians: Self Determination: Staff Orientation: Tribes: *Trust Responsibility (Government): Urban American Indians- IDENTIFIERH. *American Indian Policy Review Commission; American Indian Task Forces: Senate Select Committee on Indian Affairs , e. ABSTRACT The Senate Select Committee on Indian Affairs met on March 5, 1975, to'organize and select officers and membersof the American Indian POlicy Review Commission. Senator James Abourzek was elected chairman.and Repreientative Lloyd Heeds was elected vice chairman. Rules of procedure were tentatively adopted. Mr. Ernie Stevens vas t:dn selected as Staff Director and Mr. KirkeKickingbird as Staff Counsel. The following people'wereelected as tribal representatives: Ada Deer, John Borbridge, and Jake Whitecrow for federally recognized tribes: Louis Bruce for Urban Indians: and Adolph Dial for nonfederfaly recognized 'Indians. The firstbusiness meeting of the Commission was held on May 2, 1975. Chairman Abourzek stated that the Commission wOuld conduct a sweepingreview of the U.S. historical and legal relationship with American Indians andthat the information compiled would provi0 the intellectual framework for future_American Indian policy. Slenator Abourzek also said that the Commission would examine the difference between white and Indian society and the difference between the Indian tribes and societies. The meeting cn June 13 was concerned with discussions of and nominations.to the 11 task forces, some of which were to begin functioning in July. The meetings on July 11 and September 12 were again concerned with organizational activities. (AN) ********************Ig************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** ° A 0_17 dnq 4 tR91D "Ct L ICOMXITTEEPINT U.S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON. INDIAN AFFAIRS MEETINGS OF THEAMERICAN INDIAN POLICY REVIEW COMMISSION MARCH 5, MAY 2, JUNE 13, JULY 11, AND SEPTEMBER 12, 1975 WASHINGTON, D.C. VOLUME 1 U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION T.115 00CUMF NT HAS EIF F N II PPO. DU(FO EXACTlY AS RFC F IVF F POM THE PERSON OP OPGANIZA TION Ok A TING IT POINTS OF vIE W OP OPINIONS SIATF 0 00 NOT NE( E SSAPIt Y RE P4E SF NT OF 1 1( .At NA T IONAl INSTITUTE OF ECM( A TION POS1 TION OP P01 IC V rwl Printed for the use of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Indian Affairs U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 91-406 0 WASHINGTON is1977 r."4.3.Vsf. go, r SELECT COMMITTEE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS [Created by FL Res, 4, 95tb Cong.] JAMES ABOUREZIC, South Dakota, Chairman HOWARD METZENBAUM, Oblo DEWEY F. BARTLETT, Oklaboma JOHN MELCHER, Montana MARK 0. HATFIELD, Oregon EOM= L. STZUNII, Staff Director kJ' CON'TENTS' MEETINGS OT THE AMERICAN INDIAN POLICY REVIEW COMMISSION Page March 5, 1975 I May 2, 1975 ., 17 Afternoon sesMon i 41 r7 June 13, 1975 : 73 Afternoon seuion 93 .,July 11, 1975 . 127 Afternoon seuion 133 September 12, 1975 ' 179 Afternoon session : 209 4 MEETINGS OF THEAMERICAN INDIANPOLICY REVIEW COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, MARCH 5, 1975 INDIAN POLICY REVIEWCOMMISSION, AMERICAN Washington, D.C. 3:40 p.m., in room The Commission met,pursuant to notice, at EF-lOO, the Capitol. Present: Senator Abourezk,chairman; CongressmanMeeds, vice chairman; Senator Metcalf,member; Senator Hatfield,member; Con- Yates, member. gressman Steiger,member; and Congressman start a new Senator METCALF. Gentlemen,I do not know how you Commission. There are not anyrules, there is not anyprotocol. Olie of however, is seniority both inthe House and the fetishes of a Congress,, I should not be a in the Senate. I happier tobe the senior Member and Member in contest for eitherthe offices or appointmeat onthe Com- objection I will delegate tomyself the authority mission. Unless there is will to call this Commissionto orckir, andunless there is objection, we proceed with the meeting. of business should be theelection of a Chair- I think the first order I can get out of theChair, I man of theCommission and, therefore, so Chairman of the warn everybody thatI was elected once temporary Democratic Study Committeein the House. I held thatoffice for 31/2 years because I nevercalled a meeting. So I am notgoing to get into that position. business is the election of aChairman. Once I think the first order of the rest of the we elect aChairman itis his responsibility to run meeting. Nominations are in order forChilirman. Any other discussienthat we have prior to that election? Congressman MEEDS. Mr.Chairman. Senator METCALF. CongressmanMeeds. Congressman MEEDS. I wouldlike to be recognizedfor the purpose I would like to nominatethe Senator from of making a nomination. Indian Policy South Dakota, JamesAbourezk, as Chairman of the Review Commission. I do sowith the full understandingthat this is difficult job, very demandingjob, and that in all going to be a very is best versed in this probability theentleman from South Dakota subject matter than all of usand that he is indeedthe father of this whether it is an honor orwhether we ought legislation. I do not know should unanimously give the to offercondolences, but I think that we chairmanship to the gentlemanfrom South Dakota. Senator HATFIELD. Mr.Chairman, I seek recognition. Senator METCALF. SenatorHatfield. from the Senator HATFIELD. SinceCongressman Meeds and I come same part of the countryyou might accuse usof having some kind of a (1) 2 regional arrangement here, but actually, I think it just fits naturally. Congressman Meeds being a member of the majority party and my being a member of the minority party, the Congressman being a Member of the house .and I being a Member of the Senate, that it would be my honor to join with him and give the nomination he makes a hearty second. I have worked with Senator Abourezk on the Interior.Committee in the Senate, which is the committee that handles *he Indian legislation. I know of not only his intellectual capacity but of his marvelous and tremendous heart, his ability to see these things in terms of human values, and not just in terms of organization or bureaus or appropri- ations but really in terms of human beings. So I am very honored to join Congressman Meeds, my good neigh- bor to the north, and second the nominkion of Senator Abourezk. Senator METCALF. I am delighted to hear that nomination. Of course Senatot.Abourezk has been a leader in our committee, Senator Hatfield, and chairman of our Indian Affairs Subcommittee. Are there any other nominations? Congressman STEIGER. Mr. Chairman, I move the nominations be closed. Senator METCALF. Unless there is objection, nominations are closed, and a unanimous vote will be cast for Senator Abourezk as Chaiman of the Commission. With flailing hands I hand over this gavel, which I do not have, and you take over the chairmanship. I am delighted and it is a great privilege to serve with you and will be a privilege for all of us. Chairman ABOUREZK. I guess I have to make an acceptance speech. Senator METCALF. Put it in the record. Congressman STEIGER. Hear, hear. Chairman ABOUREZK. Who was it who once said when he was on rail--the verge of being tarred and feathered and ridden out of town on the Congressman YATES Abraham Lincoln. Chairman ABOUREZK.If it were not for the honor, I would just as soon walk." Congressman YATES. Abraham Lincoln. Chairman ABOUREZK. Thank you very much. I appreciate very much the kind words and I consider this to be an honor. Nomination will be open for our Vice Chairman. Congressman STEIGER. Mr. Chairman. Chairman ABOUREZK. Sam Steigei. Congressman STEIGER. I would like to nominate Lloyd Meeds. I will stipulate all the magnificent reasons why he should be. Besides that, he has the votes. Senator METCALF. I am going to second that nomination. Chairman ABOUREZK. I would like to second that also. Senator METCALF. I will also stipulate all those reasons. Congressman YATES. I join in the nomination. Congressman STEIGER. I move that the nominations be closed. Chairman ABOUREZK. Without objection, the nomination and elec- tion of Lloyd will be considered unanimous. The next thing we ought to do is adopt the rules, unless people want more time to study them. We brought a set of draft rules which I had one of the staff prepare from existing Senate rules that conforms to the statute which set up this Commission. fi 3 Senator METCALF. Mr. Chairman, these ruleshave just been present- ed to us. Chabman Asointelic. If you would like more time-- Senator METCALF. I suggest that since we need tohave rules and regulations, I suggest that since these have beendrafted to conform with the statute, that we tentatively adoptthose rules of the Commis- sion, and if anybody wants to bring up amendments orchanges, we will reserve our right to do it at anytime that we should deem proper. Subject to that, I move adoption of the rules. Chairman ABOUREZK. Without objection, the ruleswill be tentatively adopted subject to further study and amendmentsand correcticins. [The rules followl RULES OF PROCEDURE, FOR TM AMERICAN INDIAN POLICYREVIEW COMMISSION I MEETINGS OF THE COMMISSION 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Setting a New Course in Native American Protest Movements: the Menominee Warrior Society’S Takeover of the Alexian Brothers Novitiate in 1975
    Setting a New Course in Native American Protest Movements: The Menominee Warrior Society’s Takeover of the Alexian Brothers Novitiate in 1975 Rachel Lavender Capstone Advisor: Dr. Patricia Turner Cooperating Professors: Dr. Andrew Sturtevant and Dr. Heather Ann Moody History 489 December, 2017 Copyright for this work is owned by the author. This digital version is published by McIntyre Library, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire with the consent of the author. Table of Contents Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………….. Pg. 1 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………. Pg. 2 Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………………. Pg. 3 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………... Pg. 4 Secondary Literature……………………………………………………………………. Pg. 7 Long Term Causes: Menominee Termination and D.R.U.M.S…………..…………….. Pg. 14 Trigger………………………………………………………………………………….. Pg. 20 The Takeover: A Collision of Tactics Ada Deer and Legislative Change……………………………………………… Pg. 22 The Menominee Warrior Society and Direct Action…………………………… Pg. 27 After Gresham: Conclusion…………………………………………………………….. Pg. 30 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………. Pg. 35 1 Abstract Abstract: In the 1960s and 1970s, the United States experienced multiple Native American protest movements. These movements came from two different methods of protest: direct action, or grassroots tactics, and long-term political strategies.. The first method, grassroots tactics, was exemplified by groups such as the American Indian Movement and the Menominee Warrior Society. The occupations of Alcatraz Wounded Knee and the BIA, as well as the takeover of the Alexian Brothers Novitiate all represented the use of grassroots tactics. The second method of protest was that of peaceful change through legislation, or political strategies. The D.R.U.M.S. movement, the Menominee Restoration Committee and the political activism of Ada Deer all represented the use of political strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Menominee Termination and Restoration- an Overview
    Menominee Termination And Restoration- An Overview Termination was a program championed by many federal policy makers between the late 1940s and early 1960s. The goal of termination was to end Indian tribes' status as sovereign nations. The program was, in some sense, a step backward in U.S. Indian policy because during the 1930s the Commissioner of Indian affairs, John Collier, wanted to empower Indians and end blatantly racist policies the United States had instituted throughout its history. The crowning achievement of his Collier's tenure was the 1934 Indian Reorganization Act (IRA). The IRA became the centerpiece of what Collier called the "Indian New Deal," and explicitly recognized and encouraged Indian tribes as sovereign nations. IRA allowed Indian communities to write constitutions and organize tribal governments to govern their own internal affairs. Despite this, many congressmen and federal bureaucrats disagreed with Collier's program. Prior to Collier, the United States encouraged Indians to give up their cultures and live like "civilized" Whites. Collier left office in 1945, and his departure led these new reformers to feel they could reverse his policies and finish assimilating Indians into American mainstream society. The new reformers' program had many parallels to programs which had existed before Collier, but there were also differences. Reformers of the post-1945 era did not talk about "civilizing" the Indians but spoke instead of "freeing" and "emancipating" Indians from federal control. Goals of Termination Their program had four key goals: • Repealing laws that discriminated against Indians and gave them a different status from other Americans; • Disbanding the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and transferring its duties to other federal and state agencies or to tribes themselves; • Ending federal supervision of individual Indians; • Ending federal supervision and trust responsibilities for Indian tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • NARF Legal Review 29-2
    NativeNative AmericanAmerican RightsRights FundFund Regionalization By Any Other Name is Termination Thirty-four years ago, in are responsible for oper- a Special Message on ating them. Regionalization By Any Other Name is Indian Affairs, President Termination .............................. page 1 With those words Nixon stated: President Nixon repudiated It is long past time CASE UPDATES the prior federal policy era that the Indian policies Court in Landmark Cobell v. Norton of termination and ushered of the Federal govern- Indian Trust Suit Rules Department of in the new federal policy of ment began to recognize the Interior Must Provide Detailed Indian self-determination. Notification of Rights ............ page 8 and build upon the But recent legislative devel- capacities and insights CALLING TRIBES TO ACTION! opments reject the tenet of of the Indian people. .................................................... page 9 tribal self-determination as Both as a matter of jus- applied to Alaska tribes and tice and as a matter of Indian Law Library .................. page 10 threaten to eliminate the enlightened social poli- sovereign status of tribes cy, we must begin to act in Alaska altogether. This on the basis of what the process is being done under Indians themselves have long been telling the guise of “regionalization” of tribal funding us. The time has come to break decisively sources and is being systematically carried out with the past and to create the conditions through riders to appropriations bills. Attached for a new era in which the Indian future to the FY 04 Consolidated Spending Bill (Sec. is determined by Indian acts and Indian 112 of HR 2673) were legislative riders that decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Termination and Restoration in Oregon by Donald Fixico
    Termination and Restoration in Oregon By Donald Fixico Of the federal-Indian policies introduced to American Indians, termination of trust relations in the 1950s was arguably the most dangerous for Native peoples. On a case-by-case basis, termination threatened to end the trust relationship the U.S. government had with tribes, bands, communities, and individuals who possessed trust lands or properties, thereby giving Indians the same status as all other American citi- zens. It meant that they owned land or property without the federal protective responsibilities that were guaranteed them in the 374 United States-Indian treaties that were negotiated and ratified between 1778 and 1871. Termination stripped Indians of their identity, a part of the process to assimilate them into the mainstream American culture. The roots of termination date to World War II, when more than 25,000 Indians served in the armed ser- vices, including several hundred women. In the aftermath of the war, some bureaucrats decided it was time to change federal policy to once and for all free Native people from U.S. guardianship and pater- nalism. The Cold War was just beginning, and many American politicians believed it was important to protect conservative democratic values against anything that might be considered un-American. Indian ways of life and communal cultures on reservations ran counter to President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s po- litical philosophy and the perceived threat of Communism. At the same time, racism in America targeted Indians and other minorities,
    [Show full text]
  • American Indian Studies in Wisconsin and United States
    American Indian Studies in Wisconsin and United States TEACHER RESOURCE GUIDE DEVELOPED FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT OF JANESVILLE, WI Allies of Native Nations Committee DIVERSITY ACTION TEAM OF ROCK COUNTY |LAST UPDATED: 11/1/2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 General Resources: .................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Wisconsin-Based Overview of Act 31............................................................................................................................................ 4 Wisconsin Resources ........................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Midwest Resources .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 American Indian Overview resources ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Evaluating American Indian Materials...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Clinton's Legacy on Indigenous Issues
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications Jepson School of Leadership Studies 2001 Clinton's Legacy on Indigenous Issues David E. Wilkins University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/jepson-faculty-publications Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, and the Leadership Studies Commons Recommended Citation Wilkins, David E. “Clinton’s Legacy on Indigenous Issues.” News from Indian Country 15, no. 1 (January 2001): 18A. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Jepson School of Leadership Studies at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Clinton's legacy on Indigenous issues Wilkins, David . News from Indian Country ; Hayward, Wis. [Hayward, Wis]15 Jan 2001: 18A. ABSTRACT (ABSTRACT) The president, of course, has not express constitutional responsibility for Indian nations - that is a power reserved to the Congress under the commerce clause. Nevertheless, it is to the president, dating back to George Washington, who had an active hand in Indian affairs through the treaty process, that tribal nations and their leaders have most often looked to gauge the federal government's character and commitment to fulfill the nation's historic treaty and ongoing trust obligations to indigenous people. [Clinton]'s appointment of Bruce Babbitt, the former governor of Arizona, home to twenty-one reservations, to be the Secretary of the Interior, and Ada Deer, a Menominee Indian leader, and the first Indian woman to serve as the Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs, were generally viewed as positive appointments throughout Indian Country.
    [Show full text]
  • The Menominee Struggle to Maintain Their Tribal Assets and Protect Their Treaty Rights Following Termination
    North Dakota Law Review Volume 51 Number 1 Article 6 1974 The Menominee Struggle to Maintain Their Tribal Assets and Protect Their Treaty Rights following Termination Joseph F. Preloznik Steven Felsenthal Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Preloznik, Joseph F. and Felsenthal, Steven (1974) "The Menominee Struggle to Maintain Their Tribal Assets and Protect Their Treaty Rights following Termination," North Dakota Law Review: Vol. 51 : No. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr/vol51/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Dakota Law Review by an authorized editor of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE MENOMINEE STRUGGLE TO MAINTAIN THEIR TRIBAL ASSETS AND PROTECT THEIR TREATY RIGHTS FOLLOWING TERMINATION JOSEPH F. PRELOZNIK* STEVEN FELSENTHAL * * I. INTRODUCTION The termination policy" enabled Congress to eliminate federal fiduciary responsibility over Native Americans. However, for the undesirous and unprepared Indian, this same termination policy pro- duced a "termination psychosis": a demoralization and anxiety among terminated and nonterminated Indians who experienced either directly or by threat of application forced cultural disintegration by operation of federal decree. For the Menominee Tribe of Wisconsin termination has exhausted their tribal treasury, opened their
    [Show full text]
  • Inspirational Leadership Curriculum for Grades 8-12
    The National Native American Hall of Fame recognizes and honors the inspirational achievements of Native Americans in contemporary history For Teachers This Native American biography-based curriculum is designed for use by teachers of grade levels 8-12 throughout the nation, as it meets national content standards in the areas of literacy, social studies, health, science, and art. The lessons in this curriculum are meant to introduce students to noteworthy individuals who have been inducted into the National Native American Hall of Fame. Students are meant to become inspired to learn more about the National Native American Hall of Fame and the remarkable lives and contributions of its inductees. Shane Doyle, EdD From the CEO We, at the National Native American Hall of Fame are excited and proud to present our “Inspirational Leadership” education curriculum. Developing educational lesson plans about each of our Hall of Fame inductees is one of our organization’s key objectives. We feel that in order to make Native Americans more visible, we need to start in our schools. Each of the lesson plans provide educators with great information and resources, while offering inspiration and role models to students. We are very grateful to our supporters who have funded the work that has made this curriculum possible. These funders include: Northwest Area Foundation First Interstate Bank Foundation NoVo Foundation Dennis and Phyllis Washington Foundation Foundation for Community Vitality O.P. and W.E. Edwards Foundation Tides Foundation Humanities Montana National Endowment for the Humanities Chi Miigwech! James Parker Shield Watch our 11-minute introduction to the National Native American Hall of Fame “Inspirational Leadership Curriculum” featuring Shane Doyle and James Parker Shield at https://vimeo.com/474797515 The interview is also accessible by scanning the Quick Response (QR) code with a smartphone or QR Reader.
    [Show full text]
  • The Women of Drums and the Struggle for Menominee Restoration
    THE WOMEN OF DRUMS AND THE STRUGGLE FOR MENOMINEE RESTORATION Ethan W. Bowers A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2015 Committee: Nicole M. Jackson, Advisor Andrea Riley-Mukavetz ii ABSTRACT Nicole M. Jackson, Advisor During the 1950s and 1960s the Menominee were casualties of the Federal Termination Policy; stripped of all ties to the U.S. government, the Menominee people, economy, and environment suffered great consequences. In 1970, Determination of Rights and Unity for Menominee Shareholders (DRUMS) emerged as an activist organization in opposition to Termination and the Menominee governing elite controlling Menominee Enterprises Inc. (MEI), the tribe’s political voice, and its assets. In similar fashion to the American Indian Movement (AIM), DRUMS protested, published newsletters, and spoke out against MEI. In contrast to AIM, DRUMS struggled for cultural preservation through reform of federal policy and was lead primarily by women. Three women: Ada Deer, Sylvia Wilber, and Shirley Daly aided in devising and executing a diplomatic strategy of federal lobbying, democratic election, and public protest. DRUMS formed inter-organizational linkages, and infiltrated institutional establishments to affect change through democratically representative channels. Research of extensive primary material available on this subject including news clippings, meeting minutes, financial documents, legislative studies, personal correspondence, and referendums, confirms that DRUMS, while similar to AIM, was composed of a distinct grassroots demographic of women who re-constructed methods of resistance utilized by the dominant society to ensure survivance. Furthermore, evidence should explicate DRUMS as a noteworthy activist group led publicly and politically by women such as Ada Deer, Sylvia Wilber, and Shirley Daly, and that the women of DRUMS deserve credit for their contribution to the end of the termination era in federal Indian policy in the 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • A Native American Leaders' Forum Sandra Lee Nowack
    American Indian Law Review Volume 18 | Number 2 1-1-1993 So That You Will Hear Us: A Native American Leaders' Forum Sandra Lee Nowack Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/ailr Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation Sandra L. Nowack, So That You Will Hear Us: A Native American Leaders' Forum, 18 Am. Indian L. Rev. 551 (2018), https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/ailr/vol18/iss2/8 This Special Feature is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPECIAL FEATURES SO THAT YOU WILL HEAR US: A NATIVE AMERICAN LEADERS' FORUM Compiled by Sandra Lee Nowack On July 15, 1993, in a confirmation statement before the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, Assistant Secretary Ada E. Deer shared her hopes for a "progressive federal/tribal partnership" during her tenure with the Bureau of Indian Affairs. In this feature, the American Indian Law Review presents a written forum in which Native American leaders communicate with Assistant Secretary Deer, and with the Native American legal communi- ty. The forum serves as a voice - a shared voice of Indian leaders, expressing their views of the crucial issues facing the Bureau of Indian Affairs today. Table of Contents I. Confirmation Statement of Ada E. Deer Before the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, July 15, 1993 i1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ada E. Deer DEMOCRAT for SECRETARY of STATE
    Ada E. Deer DEMOCRAT FOR SECRETARY OF STATE ••'•••.••.••••'• A Truly Distinguished Wisconsin Native A RECORD OF SERVICE Ada Deer's exceptional abilities and personal effectiveness are reflected in her extensive record of public service. She has been a member of the national boards of Common Cause and the Girl Scouts of America, served on Congressional Commissions on the Mental Health of Children and American Indian Policy Review. Currently she is a member of the President's Commission on White House Fellows and serves on the national boards of •Jf National Association of Social Workers (Minority Committee) •#• Americans for Indian Opportunity •& American Indian Scholarships •X- Council on Foundations ADA DEER. A RECORD A Record of Leadership As both Vice President and Congressional OF ACCOMPLISHMENT liaison of the National Committee to Save the A woman of remarkable achievements, Ada was Menominee People and Forest, Ada played a key born on the Menominee Indian Reservation and role in the Menominee Restoration — a victory graduated from Shawano High School. Ada's dis­ which reversed the federal government's existing tinctions include: policy toward Native Americans. •)(• The First Menominee to graduate Following this victory for tribal self-rule, Ada from UW-Madison(1957) was elected Chairperson of the Menominee Res­ toration Committee, drafted a Tribal Constitution •)(• Master of Social Work, and By-Laws, and prepared the Menominee Columbia University, Nation for the resumption of self-rule over their Reservation for the first time since 1954. •%• Outstanding Young Woman of America, 1966 Today she teaches in the School of Social Work and Native American Studies program at UW- •)(• Honorary Doctorates from the Madison.
    [Show full text]
  • Miisaninawiind :: Manidoo-Giizis :: Jan 27-Feb 2 2020
    Miisaninawiind :: Manidoo-Giizis :: Jan 27-Feb 2 2020 Resources Heritage and Culture Directory Tourism Job Opportunities Divisions Boozhoo and welcome to the Miisaninawiind weekly newsletter! The Miisaniinawind brings you important news, announcements and updates, designed specifically for the Red Cliff community. But that's not all. The weekly eNewsletter will also provide news about neighboring tribes, communities and broader issues across Indian Country that matter to you. If you have photos, news or information you'd like to share, please email submissions to [email protected]. Check our Facebook page HERE and our website HERE. We are working on a new website and can't wait to share it with you! Want to receive the newsletter each week? Sign up HERE. Click HERE to view this email as a webpage instead. News & Updates Community Meet and Greet with Tricia Zunker February 3 @ 3:00 PM, Legendary Waters All are invited to meet and speak with Tricia Zunker of Ho-Chunk Nation as she runs for congress to be a voice for the people of northwest Wisconsin. Zunker seeks to take the Wisconsin 7th congressional district seat in a special election after the departure of Sean Duffy. She previously visited Red Cliff in January to meet with Tribal Administration regarding the issues facing our community and how she can help us overcome these issues if she were to be elected to Congress. Zunker expressed the importance of community members getting out to vote in the upcoming primary and special elections. The primary will be held on February 18. The special election will be held on May 12.
    [Show full text]