DOCSLIB.ORG

Nano-Scaled Semiconductor Devices E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nano-Scaled Semiconductor Devices E Chapter 2 Device physics, modeling, and technology for nano-scaled semiconductor devices E. A. Gutie´rrez-D.1,F.Ga´miz2, V. Sverdlov3, S. Selberherr3 and A. Torres-J.1 This chapter introduces the device physics, modeling, and technology for the dif- ferent silicon-based device structures. Quantum-mechanical treatment for the device physics is done as well as the different and alternative approaches for advanced device simulation. The last section takes over the potential use that can be given to new materials and device structures. A preliminary set of applications are reviewed, such as Si-based materials with nanostructured properties, amorphous SiGe alloys applications such as thermal and photodetector sensors. Furthermore, the possibility to make use of CMOS fabrication steps for 3D Si die stacking is also reviewed. 2.1 Bulk MOSFETs and related device structures The Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistor (MOSFET) has been and still is the workhorse device behind the semiconductor industry. The MOSFET was born in the United States under the fatherhood of Atalla and Kahng in 1960 [2.1], but its birth certificate was issued until 1963 as a patent number 3,102,230 [2.2]. Once the MOSFET showed good and reproducible electrical characteristics, the idea to form a circuit composed of multiple field-effect transistors (FETs) flour- ished with the realization of a commercial integrated circuit (IC) in 1963. Later in 1968 RCA produced the first commercial IC made of 120 p-type FETs as a 20-bit shift register [2.3]. Later in 1968 RCA produced the first commercial com- plementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) IC, the 4000 series of CMOS logic gates [2.4]. Of course the concept of the IC is attributed to Jack Kilby who in 1958 patented the idea [2.5], and later in 2000 was granted the Nobel Prize. In 1963 Wanlass and Sah also introduced [2.6], in an experimental way, a set of CMOS logical gates, flip-flops, and ring oscillator with a maximum operating voltage of 40 V. 1National Institute for Astrophysics, Optics and Electronics, INAOE, Puebla, Mexico 2Department of Electronics, University of Granada, Spain 3Institute for Microelectronics, Technical University Vienna, Austria 18 Nano-scaled semiconductor devices À4 This technology showed a transconductance gm ¼ 5 Â 10 A/V, and a leakage current for a single inverter that would amount to 1 W of standby power for 107 inverters, which is about 100 nW per inverter, or 2.5 nA leakage current per inverter. The propagation delay time is about 100 ns. While today a 28 nm CMOS technology, À3 for instance, can have a gm ¼ 7 Â 10 A/V, and a delay time in the order of ps. In the two following sections a description of the conventional FET physics and its limitations will be introduced, and then alternative FET-related structures that alleviate the limited electrical performance of traditional FET devices are introduced in the second section. In the subsequent sections advanced FET-related devices, quantum effects, different approaches for semiconductor modeling and simulation, alternative materials and device structures, are reviewed. 2.1.1 Conventional field-effect transistor (FET) physics and limitations As already mentioned the MOSFET concept was demonstrated in early 1960s based on the surface semiconductor charge controlled by the electric field as shown in Figure 2.1. The charge Qs at the semiconductor surface, close to the semiconductor–gate oxide interface, is controlled by the electric field Ey in the y-axis as shown at the right side, which in turn is controlled by the gate (G) voltage. However, when a potential difference between the drain (D) and source (S) electrodes increases (in the x-axis direction), the charge Qs becomes dependent of both electric field com- ponents, Ey and Ex. Basically what we have is a cloud of charges, either electrons or holes, that modulates the drain-source conductance controlled by the four potentials VG, VS, VD, and VB. In a conventional MOSFET of the 1980s–1990s, with a typical channel length L from 10 to 0.5 mm, a gate oxide Tox from some 60 nm down to 14 nm, the electrical characteristics are like those depicted in Figure 2.2. Both are conventional, non-LDD, polysilicon gate technologies, with a SiO2 gate oxide. These are well-behaved MOSFETs with electrical characteristics close to the ideal behavior for non-low-voltage analog applications. The 10 mm transistor has been fabricated with an experimental process at INAOE [2.7], while the 0.5 mm Inversion channel Gate oxide Tox S G D Qs n+ n+ Depletion Neutral body y P-type semiconductor bulk B Figure 2.1 A conventional n-type MOSFET device Device physics, modeling, and technology for nano-scaled semiconductor 19 240 NFET 120 NFET (W/L) = (100 μm/50 μm) (W/L) = (70 μm/70 μm) 10 μm technology 200 0.5 μm technology 100 T = 60 nm ox Tox = 14 nm (μA) (μA) 160 d d I I 80 120 60 80 40 Channel current, Channel current, 20 40 0 0 012345 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 (a)Vd (V) (b) Vd (V) 8 1 60 2 10 μm technology 0.5 μm technology V = 0.1 V 7 V = 0.1 V d d 50 0 6 0 ) (A) ) (μA) d d I (A) (μA) 40 I d I d 5 I −1 −2 4 S = 152 mV/dec 30 S = 92 mV/dec 3 −2 20 −6 −4 Channel current, current, Channel g = 2.1 × 10 A/V −5 2 m current, Channel gm = 2.88 × 10 A/V Channel current, log ( −3 Channel current, log ( 10 1 V = 0.85 V t Vt = 0.73 V −6 0 −4 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 (c) Vg (V) (d) Vg (V) Figure 2.2 Electrical characteristics of two conventional MOSFET technologies of 10 mm and 0.5 mm. Plots (a) and (b) have Vg as a parameter from low to high values, while plots (c) and (d) correspond to Id–Vg characteristics in both log and linear scales transistor is from a commercial AMI technology [2.8]. From the Id–Vd character- istics a desirable high output resistance is observed for the 0.5 mm technology. In both cases the saturation, or high output resistance region (a and b), is well defined. The subthreshold regime (c and d) in both cases is also well defined. The 0.5 mm transistor, because of the thinner gate oxide, has a larger current drive capability than that of the 10 mm technology. The subthreshold slope S, a speed-switching feature, is smaller for a 10 mm technology, while the threshold voltage Vt is smaller for the 0.5 mm technology with respect to that of 10 mm. Smaller transistors with advanced technology features, such as thinner gate oxide, show better performance, faster switching, smaller threshold voltage Vt, higher current drive capability, and higher transconductance gm (@Id/@Vg), which result in lower bias voltage, faster circuits, and larger transistor density integration. The device physics and technology behind the enhanced electrical performance, as well as the limitations for a further down scaling, are described as follows. At the semiconductor–oxide interface the energy bands bend as shown in Figure 2.3. 20 Nano-scaled semiconductor devices Oxide y = y Neutral region d Depletion region Ec Tox Ei ψb ψs Gate EF Ev Semiconductor y = yinv y y = 0 Figure 2.3 Energy band bending at the semiconductor–oxide interface for a p-type semiconductor case Several features are observed, which are fundamental for the electrical per- formance of a MOSFET. Under the influence of a positive potential Vg applied to the gate terminal, the energy bands, Ec and Ev, bend down at the semiconductor- oxide interface. The energy band bending produces, in the semiconductor region, a region depleted of holes with an extension yd, and very close the surface, within an extension yinv, an inverted region populated with electrons. Such an inversion layer populated with electrons connects electrically the source with the drain terminal. The conductance of the MOSFET channel depends on both the gate (Vg) and the drain voltage (Vd) in such a way that it produces the electrical characteristics shown in Figure 2.2. A potential barrier at the semiconductor-oxide, and through the gate oxide thickness Tox, develops as well. Such a potential barrier at the oxide prevents electrons from the inversion layer to flow to the gate. However, if the gate oxide Tox is thinner than 10 nm, a considerable amount of electrons can tunnel through the gate oxide to the gate electrode. Another relevant feature is the thickness of the inversion layer yinv, which is in the range within the 10 nm as shown in Figure 2.4. Figure 2.4 shows the simulated current density for an n-type MOSFET with a gate oxide Tox ¼ 14 nm for a particular bias condition Vg ¼ 0.3 V and Vd ¼ 0.1 V. Most of the current that flows from source-to-drain is confined into a well potential of a thickness yinv of about 5 nm. Such a thickness, which determines the channel conductivity, is bias and technology dependent. It is uniform along the channel if the drain-to-source potential is zero. The gate voltage dependence of yinv, the inversion charge n, the surface potential ys, and the channel current Id are shown in Figure 2.5. The inversion channel gets thinner as the Vg voltage increases, while the inversion charge in the channel n increases exponentially, which compensates the thinning of the inversion channel.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Characterization of the Cmos Finfet Structure On
    CHARACTERIZATION OF THE CMOS FINFET STRUCTURE ON SINGLE-EVENT EFFECTS { BASIC CHARGE COLLECTION MECHANISMS AND SOFT ERROR MODES By Patrick Nsengiyumva Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Electrical Engineering May 11, 2018 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Lloyd W. Massengill, Ph.D. Michael L. Alles, Ph.D. Bharat B. Bhuva, Ph.D. W. Timothy Holman, Ph.D. Alexander M. Powell, Ph.D. © Copyright by Patrick Nsengiyumva 2018 All Rights Reserved DEDICATION In loving memory of my parents (Boniface Bimuwiha and Anne-Marie Mwavita), my uncle (Dr. Faustin Nubaha), and my grandmother (Verediana Bikamenshi). iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation work would not have been possible without the support and help of many people. First of all, I would like to express my deepest appreciation and thanks to my advisor Dr. Lloyd Massengill for his continual support, wisdom, and mentoring throughout my graduate program at Vanderbilt University. He has pushed me to look critically at my work and become a better research scholar. I would also like to thank Dr. Michael Alles and Dr. Bharat Bhuva, who have helped me identify new paths in my research and have been a constant source of ideas. I am also very grateful to Dr. W. T. Holman and Dr. Alexander Powell for serving on my committee and for their constructive comments. Special thanks go to Dr. Jeff Kauppila, Jeff Maharrey, Rachel Harrington, and Tim Haeffner for their support with test IC designs and experiments. I would also like to thank Dennis Ball (Scooter) for his tremendous help with TCAD models.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Power Dissipation of CMOS and Finfet Based 6T SRAM Memory M
    et International Journal on Emerging Technologies (Special Issue on ICRIET-2016) 7(2): 347-353(2016) ISSN No. (Print) : 0975-8364 ISSN No. (Online) : 2249-3255 Estimation of Power Dissipation of CMOS and finFET based 6T SRAM Memory M. R. Govind * and Chetan Alatagi** *Asst Prof, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, VSMIT, Nipani, Karanataka, India ** Asst Prof, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, VSMIT, Nipani, Karanataka, India (Corresponding author : M. R. Govind) (Received 28 September, 2016 Accepted 29 October, 2016) (Published by Research Trend, Website: www.researchtrend.net) ABSTRACT: This paper provides the estimation of power dissipation of CMOS and finFET based 6T SRAM Memory. CMOS expertise feature size and threshold voltage have been scaling down for decades for achieving high density and high performance. The continuing reduce in the feature size and the corresponding increases in chip density and operating frequency have made power consumption a major concern in VLSI design. Extreme power dissipation in integrated circuits discourages their use in moveable systems. Low threshold voltage also results in enlarged sub-threshold leakage current because transistors cannot be turned off completely. For these reasons, leakage power dissipation , has become a major part of total power consumption for current and future silicon technologies. FinFET evolving to be a promising technology in this regard .In this the designing, modeling and optimizing the 6-T SRAM cell device is done. Keywords: CMOS, FinFET, Static RAM, Read/Write, Sense Amplifier nanometer process technologies have advanced, Chip I. INTRODUCTION density and operating frequency have increased, that It is found that FinFET-based 6T SRAM cells designed makes power burning up in battery operated portable with built in feedback realize significant improvements devices a major concern.
    [Show full text]
  • The End of Moore's Law and Faster General Purpose Computing, and A
    The End of Moore’s Law & Faster General Purpose Computing, and a Road Forward John Hennessy Stanford University March 2019 The End of an Era • 40 years of stunning progress in microprocessor design • 1.4x annual performance improvement for 40+ years ≈ 106 x faster (throughput)! • Three architectural innovations: • Width: 8->16->64 bit (~4x) • Instruction level parallelism: • 4-10 cycles per instruction to 4+ instructions per cycle (~10-20x) • Multicore: one processor to 32 cores (~32x) • Clock rate: 3 MHz to 4 GHz (through technology & architecture) • Made possible by IC technology: • Moore’s Law: growth in transistor count • Dennard Scaling: power/transistor shrinks as speed & density increase • Power = frequency x CV2 • Energy expended per computation was reducing Future processors 1 THREE CHANGES CONVERGE • Technology • End of Dennard scaling: power becomes the key constraint • Slowdown in Moore’s Law: transistors cost (even unused) • Architectural • Limitation and inefficiencies in exploiting instruction level parallelism end the uniprocessor era. • Amdahl’s Law and its implications end the “easy” multicore era • Application focus shifts • From desktop to individual, mobile devices and ultrascale cloud computing, IoT: new constraints. Future processors 2 UNIPROCESSOR PERFORMANCE (SINGLE CORE) Performance = highest SPECInt by year; from Hennessy & Patterson [2018]. Future processors 3 MOORE’S LAW IN DRAMS 4 THE TECHNOLOGY SHIFTS MOORE’S LAW SLOWDOWN IN INTEL PROCESSORS 10X Cost/transisto r slowing down faster, due to fab costs. Future processors 5 TECHNOLOGY, POWER, AND DENNARD SCALING 200 4.5 180 4 Technology (nm) 160 3.5 Energy/nm^2 140 3 120 2.5 100 2 80 1.5 60 Namometers 1 40 20 0.5 nm^2 per Power Relative 0 0 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 Power consumption Energy scaling for fixed task is better, since more & faster xistors.
    [Show full text]
  • AI Chips: What They Are and Why They Matter
    APRIL 2020 AI Chips: What They Are and Why They Matter An AI Chips Reference AUTHORS Saif M. Khan Alexander Mann Table of Contents Introduction and Summary 3 The Laws of Chip Innovation 7 Transistor Shrinkage: Moore’s Law 7 Efficiency and Speed Improvements 8 Increasing Transistor Density Unlocks Improved Designs for Efficiency and Speed 9 Transistor Design is Reaching Fundamental Size Limits 10 The Slowing of Moore’s Law and the Decline of General-Purpose Chips 10 The Economies of Scale of General-Purpose Chips 10 Costs are Increasing Faster than the Semiconductor Market 11 The Semiconductor Industry’s Growth Rate is Unlikely to Increase 14 Chip Improvements as Moore’s Law Slows 15 Transistor Improvements Continue, but are Slowing 16 Improved Transistor Density Enables Specialization 18 The AI Chip Zoo 19 AI Chip Types 20 AI Chip Benchmarks 22 The Value of State-of-the-Art AI Chips 23 The Efficiency of State-of-the-Art AI Chips Translates into Cost-Effectiveness 23 Compute-Intensive AI Algorithms are Bottlenecked by Chip Costs and Speed 26 U.S. and Chinese AI Chips and Implications for National Competitiveness 27 Appendix A: Basics of Semiconductors and Chips 31 Appendix B: How AI Chips Work 33 Parallel Computing 33 Low-Precision Computing 34 Memory Optimization 35 Domain-Specific Languages 36 Appendix C: AI Chip Benchmarking Studies 37 Appendix D: Chip Economics Model 39 Chip Transistor Density, Design Costs, and Energy Costs 40 Foundry, Assembly, Test and Packaging Costs 41 Acknowledgments 44 Center for Security and Emerging Technology | 2 Introduction and Summary Artificial intelligence will play an important role in national and international security in the years to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing 10-Nm Finfet Technology in Microwind Etienne Sicard
    Introducing 10-nm FinFET technology in Microwind Etienne Sicard To cite this version: Etienne Sicard. Introducing 10-nm FinFET technology in Microwind. 2017. hal-01551695 HAL Id: hal-01551695 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01551695 Submitted on 30 Jun 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. APPLICATION NOTE 10 nm technology Introducing 10-nm FinFET technology in Microwind Etienne SICARD Professor INSA-Dgei, 135 Av de Rangueil 31077 Toulouse – France www.microwind.org email: [email protected] This paper describes the implementation of a high performance FinFET-based 10-nm CMOS Technology in Microwind. New concepts related to the design of FinFET and design for manufacturing are also described. The performances of a ring oscillator layout and a 6-transistor RAM memory layout are also analyzed. 1. Technology Roadmap Several companies and research centers have released details on the 14-nm CMOS technology, as a major step for improved integration and performances, with the target of 7-nm process by 2020. We recall in
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Finfets: from Devices to Architectures
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Advances in Electronics Volume 2014, Article ID 365689, 21 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/365689 Review Article FinFETs: From Devices to Architectures Debajit Bhattacharya and Niraj K. Jha Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Niraj K. Jha; [email protected] Received 4 June 2014; Accepted 23 July 2014; Published 7 September 2014 Academic Editor: Jaber Abu Qahouq Copyright © 2014 D. Bhattacharya and N. K. Jha. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Since Moore’s law driven scaling of planar MOSFETs faces formidable challenges in the nanometer regime, FinFETs and Trigate FETs have emerged as their successors. Owing to the presence of multiple (two/three) gates, FinFETs/Trigate FETs are able to tackle short-channel effects (SCEs) better than conventional planar MOSFETs at deeply scaled technology nodes and thus enable continued transistor scaling. In this paper, we review research on FinFETs from the bottommost device level to the topmost architecture level. We survey different types of FinFETs, various possible FinFET asymmetries and their impact, and novel logic- level and architecture-level tradeoffs offered by FinFETs. We also review analysis and optimization tools that are available for characterizing FinFET devices, circuits, and architectures. 1. Introduction (), drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL), and threshold voltage ( th) roll-off. Improvement in these metrics implies Relentless scaling of planar MOSFETs over the past four less degradation in the transistor’s th with continued scaling, decades has delivered ever-increasing transistor density and which in turn implies less degradation in off .
    [Show full text]
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission Form
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report: November 20, 2014 (Date of earliest event reported) INTEL CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 000-06217 94-1672743 (State or other jurisdiction (Commission (IRS Employer of incorporation) File Number) Identification No.) 2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, California 95054-1549 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (408) 765-8080 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) (Former name or former address, if changed since last report) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below): [ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) [ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) [ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) [ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4c)) Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure The information in this report shall not be treated as filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. On November 20, 2014, Intel Corporation presented business and financial information to institutional investors, analysts, members of the press and the general public at a publicly available webcast meeting (the "Investor Meeting").
    [Show full text]
  • The Breakthrough Advantage for Fpgas with Tri-Gate Technology
    WHITE PAPER FPGA The Breakthrough Advantage for FPGAs with Tri-Gate Technology Transistor design transitions from traditional planar to 3-D structures provide a significant boost in the capabilities of high-performance programmable logic. Authors Introduction Ryan Kenny In February 2013, Altera® and Intel® Corporation jointly announced that the next Senior Product Marketing Manager generation of Altera’s highest performance FPGA products would be produced Intel Programmable Solutions Group using Intel’s 14 nm 3-D Tri-Gate transistor technology exclusively. In December 2015, Intel completed the acquisition of Altera. This makes Intel the exclusive Jeff Watt major FPGA provider of the most advanced, highest performance semiconductor Technical Fellow technology available. To understand the impact of Tri-Gate technology on the Intel Programmable Solutions Group capabilities of high-performance FPGAs, and how significant this advantage is in digital circuit speed, power, and production availability, a background on the development and state of Tri-Gate and related technologies is offered here. Transistor design background In 1947 the first transistor, a germanium ‘point-contact’ structure, was demonstrated at Bell Laboratories. Silicon was first used to produce bipolar transistors in 1954, but it was not until 1960 that the first silicon metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) was built. The earliest MOSFETs Table of Contents were 2D planar devices with current flowing along the surface of the silicon under Introduction . .1 the gate. The basic structure of MOSFET devices has remained substantially unchanged for over 50 years. Transistor Design Background. .1 Since the prediction or proclamation of Moore’s Law in 1965, many additional Important Turning Point in enhancements and improvements have been made to the manufacture and Transistor Technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 Last Updated June 02, 2016 Title Dr. First Name Manoj Last Name Saxena Photograph Designation Associate Prof
    Last Updated June 02, 2016 Title Dr. First Name Manoj Last Name Saxena Photograph Designation Associate Professor Address Department of Electronics Deen Dayal Upadhyaya College University of Delhi Karampura, New Delhi-110015, India Phone No Office 011 -25458173 Residence 011 -28531418 Mobile 09968393104 Email [email protected], [email protected] Web -Page Education al Qualification s Degree Institution Year Ph.D. Electronics University of Delhi 2006 M. Sc. Electronics University of Delhi 2000 (Gold Medalist ) B. Sc. (H) Electronics University of Delhi 1998 Career Profile • Lecturer, Department of Electronics, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya College, University of Delhi (August 2000 - December 2005) • Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya College, University of Delhi (01/01/2006 – 26/08/2006) • Assistant Professor (Senior Lecturer), Department of Electronics, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya College, University of Delhi (27/08/2006 – 26/08/2009) • Assistant Professor (Reader), Department of Electronics, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya College, University of Delhi (27/08/2009 - Till Date) • Associate Professor, Department of Electronics, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya College, University of Delhi (27/08/2012 - Till Date) Administrative Assignments Year 20 16 – 2017 • Convener-Research Centre • Convener – Science Foundation • Convener – College Research Committee • Convener – Website Committee • Convener – Career Counseling and Placement Cell • Convener – India Today NIELSEN Survey Committee for Science, Commerce and Arts • Election Officer
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey on Multi Gate MOSFETS
    ISSN (Online) : 2319 - 8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347 - 6710 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology Volume 3, Special Issue 3, March 2014 2014 International Conference on Innovations in Engineering and Technology (ICIET’14) 21st & 22nd March Organized by K.L.N. College of Engineering, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India A Survey on Multi Gate MOSFETS B.Buvaneswari Department Of CSE , K.L.N College of engineering ,Madurai, , India (small MOSFETs demonstrate higher outflow currents, ABSTRACT— This paper presents the various device and lower output resistance). A multigate device or structure of MOSFETs like SOI-MOSFET, Double gate multiple gate junction transistor (MuGFET) refers to a Mosfet, Trigate mosfet, Multigate mosfet ,Nanowire MOSFET (metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect Mosfets,High-K Mosfets& their deserves. To grasp transistor) which includes quite one gate into a sole during a easy means, mathematical ideas of device device. The multiple gates could also be controlled by physics skipped. one gate.conductor, whereby the multiple gate surfaces act electrically as one gate, or by freelance gate INDEX TERMS-DG-MOSFET, GAA, MuG electrodes. A multigate device using freelance gate MOSFETS. electrodes is usually referred to as a Multiple Insulated Gate Field impact electronic transistor (MIGFET). Multigate transistors square measure one in every of I.INTRODUCTION quite an few ways being developed by CMOS semiconductor makers to form ever-smaller Over the past decades, the Metal oxide Semiconductor microprocessors and memory cells, conversationally (MOSFET) has repeatedly been scaled down in size[1]; spoken as extending Moore's Law.[1]Development classic MOSFET channel lengths were once many efforts into multigate transistors are reported by AMD, micrometers, however fashionable integrated circuits Hitachi, IBM, Infineon Technologies, Intel Corporation, square measure incorporating MOSFETs with channel TSMC, Free scale Semiconductor, University of lengths of tens of nanometers.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 16 Emerging Devices
    2019 Edition Chapter 16: Emerging Research Devices http://eps.ieee.org/hir 17 October 2019: updated, reorganized; added Section on Carbon Nanotube Electronics The HIR is devised and intended for technology assessment only and is without regard to any commercial considerations pertaining to individual products or equipment. We acknowledge with gratitude the use of material and figures in this Roadmap that are excerpted from original sources. Figures & tables should be re-used only with the permission of the original source. October, 2019 Emerging Research Devices To download additional chapters, please visit Table of Contents http://eps.ieee.org/hir CHAPTER 1: HETEROGENEOUS INTEGRATION ROADMAP: OVERVIEW ........................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2: HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING AND DATA CENTERS ............................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 3: THE INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) .................................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 4: MEDICAL, HEALTH & WEARABLES ............................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 5: AUTOMOTIVE ............................................................................................................................................ 1 CHAPTER 6: AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE ......................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER
    [Show full text]
  • Design Strategies for Ultralow Power 10Nm Finfets
    Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Theses 5-2017 Design Strategies for Ultralow Power 10nm FinFETs Abhijeet M. Walke [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses Recommended Citation Walke, Abhijeet M., "Design Strategies for Ultralow Power 10nm FinFETs" (2017). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Design Strategies for Ultralow Power 10nm FinFETs by ABHIJEET M. WALKE A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Electrical Engineering Department of Electrical & Microelectronic Engineering Kate Gleason College of Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, NY May 2017 i Design Strategies for Ultralow Power 10nm FinFETs ABHIJEET M. WALKE A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Electrical Engineering Approved by: Dr. Santosh Kurinec Date Professor, (Thesis Advisor) Dr. Karl Hirschman Date Professor, (Committee Member) Dr. Robert Pearson Date Professor, (Committee Member) Dr. Garrett Schlenvogt Date Silvaco, Inc, (External Committee Member) Dr. Sohail Dianat Date Professor, (Department Head) Department of Electrical and Microelectronic Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, New York May, 2017 ii Acknowledgements Before getting to the core of this master thesis, I would like to take some time to thank all those people who made this project possible. Firstly, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor Prof.
    [Show full text]