Posthorn Nov 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Posthorn Nov 2015 POSTAL & COURIER SERVICES BRANCH OF THE ROYAL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION THE POSTHORN Addition 30 November 2015 Contents Operation Sea Lion/ Seelowe Operation Sea lion/ Seelowe Page 1- 11 Allied-Occupied Germany Page 11- 16 Germany BFPOs then & Now. Page 16 - 18 Cold War Remembered Page 18 - 23 Medal Update Page 23 - 24 Post Notes Annual General Meeting Page 24 - 26 Membership & Committee Page 26 Lost & Found Members Page 26 -27 Subscriptions Page 27 - 29 Booking Form Page 30 Forthcoming Events Annual Dinner & Dance Operation Sea Lion (German: Unternehmen Seelöwe) was Nazi Germany's plan PCS REA Reunion to invade the United Kingdom during the Second World War, following the Fall of 8th – 10th April 2016 France. For any likelihood of success the operation required both air and naval superiority over the English Channel, neither of which the Germans ever achieved during or after the Battle of Britain. Sea Lion was postponed indefinitely on 17 REA Events 2016 September 1940 and never carried out. 28 May Trooping the Colour - Major General’s Review 09 June Royal Hospital Chelsea Background Founder’s Day Parade Adolf Hitler had decided by early November 1939 on forcing an end to the war by 4 June Trooping the Colour – invading France. In order to avoid the heavily-defended Maginot Line the Germans Colonel’s Review 8 - 9 June Beating Retreat, had to invade Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg in order to invade London France. With the prospect of the Channel ports falling under Kriegsmarine (the 10 – 12 June Chilwell Weekend* German navy) control, and attempting to anticipate the obvious next step that might 11 June Queen’s Birthday entail, Grand Admiral (Großadmiral) Erich Raeder (head of the Kriegsmarine) Parade instructed his operations officer, Kapitän Hans Jürgen Reinicke, to draw up a 29 – 31 July Minley Weekend* document examining "the possibility of troop landings in England should the future 16 - 18 September Corps progress of the war make the problem arise." Reinicke spent five days on this study Memorial Weekend* and set forth the following prerequisites: Elimination or sealing off of Royal 08 October REA AGM and Navy forces from the landing and approach areas. Annual Dinner * 09 October Sapper Sunday at Royal Hospital Chelsea Elimination of the Royal Air Force (RAF). 10 November Field of Destruction of all Royal Navy units in the coastal zone. Remembrance, Westminster Prevention of British submarine action against the landing fleet. Abbey 13 November Remembrance In December 1939, the German Army issued its own study paper Sunday (designated Nordwest) and solicited opinions and input from both *National Events the Kriegsmarine and Luftwaffe(the German Air Force). The paper outlined an assault on England's eastern coast between The Wash and the River Thames by troops crossing the North Sea from the Low The POSTHORN November 2015 Newsletter Page | 1 Country ports. Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring, head of the Luftwaffe, responded with a single-page letter in which he stated: "...a combined operation having the objective of landing in England must be rejected. It could only be the final act of an already victorious war against Britain as otherwise the preconditions for success of a combined operation would not be met." The Kriegsmarine response was rather more restrained but equally focused on pointing out the many difficulties to be surmounted if invading England was to be a viable option. Later in the spring of 1940 the Kriegsmarine became even more opposed to invading Britain after its Pyrrhic victory in Norway. After Operation Weserübung, as the invasion of Norway had been code-named, the Kriegsmarine had only one heavy cruiser, two light cruisers, and four destroyers available for operations. Admiral Raeder was strongly opposed to Sea Lion since almost the entire Kriegsmarine surface fleet had been either sunk or badly damaged in Weserübung, and his service was hopelessly outnumbered by the ships of the Royal Navy. On 16 July 1940, following Germany's swift and successful occupation of France and the Low Countries and growing impatient with Britain's outright rejection of his recent peace overtures, Hitler issued Führer Directive No. 16, setting in motion preparations for a landing in Britain. He prefaced the order by stating: "As England, in spite of her hopeless military situation, still shows no signs of willingness to come to terms, I have decided to prepare, and if necessary to carry out, a landing operation against her. The aim of this operation is to eliminate the English Motherland as a base from which the war against Germany can be continued, and, if necessary, to occupy the country completely." Hitler's directive set four conditions for the invasion to occur: The RAF was to be "beaten down in its morale and in fact, that it can no longer display any appreciable aggressive force in opposition to the German crossing". The English Channel was to be swept of British mines at the crossing points, and the Strait of Dover must be blocked at both ends by German mines. The coastal zone between occupied France and England must be dominated by heavy artillery. The Royal Navy must be sufficiently engaged in the North Sea and the Mediterranean so that it could not intervene in the crossing. British home squadrons must be damaged or destroyed by air and torpedo attacks. This ultimately placed responsibility for Sea Lion 's success squarely on the shoulders of Raeder and Göring, neither of whom had the slightest enthusiasm for the venture and, in fact, did little to hide their opposition to it. Nor did Directive 16 provide for a combined operational headquarters under which all three service branches (Army, Navy, Air Force) could work together under a single umbrella organisation to plan, coordinate and execute such a complex undertaking (similar to the Allies' creation of the Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force (SHAEF) for the later Normandy landings). Upon hearing of Hitler's intentions, Italian dictator Benito Mussolini, through his Foreign Minister Count Galeazzo Ciano, quickly offered up to ten divisions and thirty squadrons of Italian aircraft for the proposed invasion. Hitler initially declined any such aid but eventually allowed a small contingent of Italian fighters and bombers, the Italian Air Corps (Corpo Aereo Italiano or CAI), to assist in the Luftwaffe's aerial campaign over Britain in October/November 1940.] German land forces In the plan finalised in August 1940, the invasion force was organised into two army groups drawn from the 6th Army, the 9th Army and the 16th Army. The first wave of the landing would have consisted of eleven infantry and mountain divisions, the second wave of eight panzer and motorised infantry divisions and finally, the third wave was formed of six further infantry divisions. The initial assault would have also included two airborne divisions and the special forces of the Brandenburg Regiment.[13] Air power Battle of Britain Beginning in August 1940, the German Luftwaffe began a series of concentrated aerial attacks (designated Unternehmen Adlerangriff or Operation Eagle Attack) on targets throughout the United Kingdom in an attempt to destroy the RAF and establish air superiority over Great Britain. The campaign later became known as the Battle of Britain. The change in emphasis of the bombing from RAF bases to bombing London, however, turned Adlerangriff into a strategic bombing operation. The effect of the switch in strategy is disputed. Some historians argue that the change in strategy lost the Luftwaffe the opportunity of winning the air battle, or air superiority. Others argue the Luftwaffe achieved little in the air battle and the RAF was not on the verge of collapse, as often claimed. Another perspective has also been put forward, which suggests the Germans could not have gained air superiority before the weather window closed. Others have pointed out that it was unlikely the Luftwaffe would ever be able to destroy RAF Fighter Command. If British losses became severe, the RAF could simply have withdrawn northward and regrouped. It could then deploy when, or if, the Germans launched an invasion. Most historians argue Sea Lion would have failed regardless, because of the weaknesses of German sea power compared to the Royal Navy. The view of those who believed, regardless of a potential German victory in the air battle, that Sea Lion was still not going to succeed included a number of German General Staff members. Admiral Karl Dönitz believed air superiority was "not enough". Dönitz stated, "we possessed neither control of the air or the sea; nor were we in any position to gain it". Erich Raeder, commander-in-chief of the Kriegsmarine in 1940 argued: The POSTHORN November 2015 Newsletter Page | 2 .....the emphatic reminder that up until now the British had never thrown the full power of their fleet into action. However, a German invasion of England would be a matter of life and death for the British, and they would unhesitatingly commit their naval forces, to the last ship and the last man, into an all-out fight for survival. Our Air Force could not be counted on to guard our transports from the British Fleets, because their operations would depend on the weather, if for no other reason. It could not be expected that even for a brief period our Air Force could make up for our lack of naval supremacy. When Franz Halder, the Chief of the Army General Staff, heard of the state of the Kriegsmarine, and its plan for the invasion, he noted in his diary, on 28 July 1940, "If that [the plan] is true, all previous statements by the navy were so much rubbish and we can throw away the whole plan of invasion". Alfred Jodl, Chief of Operations in the OKW (Oberkommando der Wehrmacht), remarked, after Raeder said the Kriegsmarine could not meet the operational requirements of the Army, "then a landing in England must be regarded as a sheer act of desperation".
Recommended publications
  • Sub Rosa Newsletter of the Friends of the Intelligence Corps Museum E Newsletter 08 - Summer 2014 a WARM WELCOME to YOUR SUMMER SUB ROSA !
    Sub Rosa Newsletter of the Friends of The Intelligence Corps Museum E Newsletter 08 - Summer 2014 A WARM WELCOME TO YOUR SUMMER SUB ROSA ! Firstly we would like to congratulate Museum Curator – Sally Ann Reed, Archivist – Joyce MUSEUM NEWS: Hutton and all the team for presenting the much refreshed museum displays in time for Corps WWI Day (19th July). is was a truly Herculean effort all round and was much appreciated by INTERACTIVE those who were able to attend on the day and will surely impress all visitors to the museum in DISPLAY the coming months and beyond. We hope that many FICM members and their guests will take the opportunity to attend the trust’s open COMMISSIONED day and reception to be held on 11th September (Templer Day) in the museum, thus affording an excellent opportunity to appreciate the new layout and features, such as the brand new interactive WWI This important display has been made possible by the most generous display (made possible with substantial support from Julian Barnard). You are urged to register for this donations of: Mr Julian Barnard & event as soon as possible, please. We also draw your attention to the opportunity to visit the priory on Trusthouse Forte, arranged with the October 11th to attend the Priory Friends’ study day, which marks the 850th anniversary of Archbishop kind assistance of Lady Balfour of Thomas Becket’s visit to the priory! (See planned events). Burleigh. In addition to contributions from the “usual suspects” this edition features fascinating articles from Derek Hawker, Angus Southwood and museum volunteer, Andy Cole – our thanks to you all! Thankfully we are beginning to see an increasing flow of new articles of interest and anecdotes from former Corps personnel, which are truly valued by readers of Sub Rosa – so do, please keep them coming in! John Quenby, Chairman PLANNED EVENTS 12 August 2014 – Corps parade and ceremonial near Rouen in France.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2019 Full Issue the .SU
    Naval War College Review Volume 72 Article 1 Number 1 Winter 2019 2019 Winter 2019 Full Issue The .SU . Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Naval War College, The .SU . (2019) "Winter 2019 Full Issue," Naval War College Review: Vol. 72 : No. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol72/iss1/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Naval War College: Winter 2019 Full Issue Winter 2019 Volume 72, Number 1 Winter 2019 Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2019 1 Naval War College Review, Vol. 72 [2019], No. 1, Art. 1 Cover Aerial view of an international container cargo ship. In “Ships of State?,” Christopher R. O’Dea describes how China COSCO Shipping Corporation Limited has come to control a rapidly expanding network of ports and terminals, ostensibly for commercial purposes, but has thereby gained the ability to project power through the increased physical presence of its naval vessels—turning the oceans that historically have protected the United States from foreign threats into a venue in which China can challenge U.S. interests. Credit: Getty Images https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol72/iss1/1 2 Naval War College: Winter 2019 Full Issue NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW Winter 2019 Volume 72, Number 1 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE PRESS 686 Cushing Road Newport, RI 02841-1207 Published by U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles
    The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles The Chinese Navy Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles Saunders, EDITED BY Yung, Swaine, PhILLIP C. SAUNderS, ChrISToPher YUNG, and Yang MIChAeL Swaine, ANd ANdreW NIeN-dzU YANG CeNTer For The STUdY oF ChINeSe MilitarY AffairS INSTITUTe For NATIoNAL STrATeGIC STUdIeS NatioNAL deFeNSe UNIverSITY COVER 4 SPINE 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY COVER.indd 3 COVER 1 11/29/11 12:35 PM The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY.indb 1 11/29/11 12:37 PM 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY.indb 2 11/29/11 12:37 PM The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles Edited by Phillip C. Saunders, Christopher D. Yung, Michael Swaine, and Andrew Nien-Dzu Yang Published by National Defense University Press for the Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs Institute for National Strategic Studies Washington, D.C. 2011 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY.indb 3 11/29/11 12:37 PM Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Defense or any other agency of the Federal Government. Cleared for public release; distribution unlimited. Chapter 5 was originally published as an article of the same title in Asian Security 5, no. 2 (2009), 144–169. Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. Used by permission. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Chinese Navy : expanding capabilities, evolving roles / edited by Phillip C. Saunders ... [et al.]. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index.
    [Show full text]
  • Allied Military Liaison Missions, 1946-1990
    PARALLEL HISTORY PROJECT ON NATO AND THE WARSAW PACT (PHP) Allied Military Liaison Missions, 1946-1990 Christopher Winkler, Anna Locher, and Christian Nuenlist (eds.) by courtesy of the Allied Musem, Berlin PHP Publications Series Washington, D.C. / Zurich July 2005 This publication is part of a publications series by the Parallel History Project on NATO and the Warsaw Pact (PHP). The PHP provides new scholarly perspectives on contemporary international history by collecting, analyzing, and interpreting formerly secret governmental documents. Since its establishment in 1999, the project has collected thousands of pages of material on security-related issues of the Cold War, published a large number of online documentaries on central issues such as mutual threat perceptions and alliance management, and organized several major international conferences on war planning, intelligence, and intra-bloc tensions. Further information is provided at the PHP Website: www.isn.ethz.ch/php. Table of Contents 1) Introduction, by Christopher Winkler.............................................................................1 2) The Military Liaison Missions in Germany During the Cold War: Documents and Interpretations, by Gen. William E. Odom.......................................................................12 3) Sample Document : Information on Incident with Members of the US Military Mission in Techentin (District of Schwerin) ..................................................................................14 Please note: This issue of the PHP Publication Series offers highlights from a much larger online document collection. Please consult the PHP website for all the documents in their original language and other features: http://www.isn.ethz.ch/php/collections/coll_mlm.htm. The PHP has published a number of document collections on various aspects of the security- related history of the cold war: http://www.isn.ethz.ch/php.
    [Show full text]
  • Niedersächsisches Justizministerium
    Neuwerk (zu Hamburg) Bezirk des Oberlandesgerichts und der Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Schleswig-Holstein Celle Balje Krummen- Flecken deich Freiburg - Organisation der ordentlichen Gerichte Nordkehdingen (Elbe) CUXHAVEN OTTERNDORF Belum und Staatsanwaltschaften - Flecken Neuhaus Geversdorf Oederquart (Oste) Neuen- Minsener Oog Cadenberge kirchen Oster- Wisch- Nordleda bruch hafen Stand: 1. September 2015 BülkauAm Dobrock Oberndorf Mellum Land Hadeln Wurster Nordseeküste Ihlienworth Wingst Wanna Osten Drochtersen Odis- Hemmoor heim HEMMOOR Großenwörden Steinau Stinstedt Mittelsten- Engelschoff ahe Hansestadt GEESTLAND Lamstedt Hechthausen STADE Börde Lamstedt Himmel- Burweg pforten Hammah Kranen-Oldendorf-Himmelpforten Hollern- burg Düden- Twielenfleth Armstorf Hollnseth büttel WILHELMS- Oldendorf Grünen- (Stade) Stade Stein-deich Fries- Bremer- kirchen HAVEN Cuxhaven Estorf Heinbockel Agathen- Hamburg (Stade) burg Lühe Alfstedt Mitteln- Butjadingen haven (Geestequelle) Guder- kirchen hand- Schiffdorf Dollern viertel (zu Bremen) Ebersdorf Neuen- Fredenbeck Horneburg kirchen Jork Deinste (Lühe) Flecken Hipstedt Fredenbeck Horneburg NORDENHAM Geestequelle Nottens- BREMERVÖRDE Kutenholz dorf Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Bargstedt Oerel Blieders- dorf BUXTEHUDE Loxstedt Flecken Farven Harsefeld Basdahl Beverstedt Apensen Brest Neu Wulmstorf Harsefeld (Harburg) land Stadland Deinstedt Apensen Drage Marschacht Beckdorf Moisburg Sandbostel Rosengarten Elbmarsch Anderlingen Seevetal VAREL Ahlerstedt Reges- Appel Tespe Sauensiek bostel Stelle Gnarrenburg
    [Show full text]
  • BRIXMIS (British Commanders'-In-Chief Mission to the Soviet Forces in Germany)
    BRIXMIS (British Commanders'-In-Chief Mission to the Soviet Forces in Germany) BRIXMIS was a military liaison which operated behind the Iron Curtain in East Germany during the cold war. The area covered was as illustrated. The British Commanders'-in-Chief Mission (BRIXMIS) to the Soviet Forces in Germany (GSFG) was formed on 16 September 1946 under the Robertson-Malinin Agreement between the chiefs of staff of the British and Soviet forces in occupied (east) Germany. The agreement called for the reciprocal exchange of liaison missions in order to foster good working relations between the military occupation authorities in the two zones. Similar agreements were made the following year by the Soviets with the French (FMLM) and the Americans (USMLM). For unexplained reasons the agreements differed significantly as BRIXMIS was allowed to have almost as many liaison staff in the Soviet Zone as the other two missions combined. The agreements remained in force until 2 October 1990 when all three missions were deactivated on the eve of Germany's reunification. For the first 2-3 years BRIXMIS was part of the Control Commission Germany (CCG) and the military personnel were paid by the FCO and were registered with CCG. The original BRIXMIS charter in 1946 included the following tasks: • Repatriation of POWs, displaced persons and deserters. • The search for war criminals and their extradition. • Graves registration. • Settling of border disputes. • Anti black market operations. • Passage of information between the Soviet and British Commanders- in-Chief. 1 The first BRIXMIS Tour was on 5 October 1946 when it crossed the Glienicker Bridge to take over the Mission House in Potsdam.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Navy Records
    -1- PLEASE ALWAYS QUOTE LIST NUMBER WHEN ORDERING. BOOK POST: From the 1st April 2014. Our postage charges will be as follows:- UK Customers: 0 to 1 Kilo - £3.50 1 to 2 Kilos - £4.50 2 to 30 Kilos - £8.50* * UK Mainland only (exceptions Scottish Highlands & Islands, Northern Ireland, Isle of Man and Isles of Scilly) Overseas customers: will be asked to pay the normal seamail, postage rates. Air Mail is available: extra charge on request. BOOK CARRIAGE: U.K. Parcels weighing less than 2kg are sent by 2nd class or Royal Mail standard parcel. Parcels weighing more than 2kg are sent via Parcel Force, 48 hour service. Books are sent at customers risk unless separately insured. The extra cost of insured carriage or ‘signed for’ delivery to customers is available on request. All orders are despatched promptly, usually next day. BOOK ORDERING: Books may be ordered by letter, phone, or e-mail or fax. Our e-mail is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Do not forget to look at the back-dated catalogues. Books are frequently unsold. BOOK PAYMENT: All customers may pay by Cash, Cheque and ALL Credit and Debit cards EXCEPT AMEX OR EUROCHEQUE. Please quote your card number, expiry date and security code (the last 3 digits on the signature strip) in separate emails if preferred for security reasons and the full address at which the card is registered when ordering. U.K and Overseas customers may also await our Proforma Invoice. Institutions will receive the books with an invoice plus postage or carriage charges.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Eyes Alpha by the Same Author UK Eyes Alpha Big Boys' Rules: the SAS and the Secret Struggle Against the IRA Lnside British Lntelligence
    UK Eyes Alpha By the same author UK Eyes Alpha Big Boys' Rules: The SAS and the secret struggle against the IRA lnside British lntelligence Mark Urban tr firhrr anr/ fulrr' ft For Ruth and Edwin Contents lntroduction Part One The First published in I996 1 Coming Earthquake 3 and Faber Limited by Faber 2 A Dark and Curious Shadow 13 3 Queen Square London vcrN JAU 3 The Charm Offensive 26 Typeset by Faber and Faber Ltd Printed in England by Clays Ltd, St Ives plc 4 Most Ridiculed Service 42 All rights reserved 5 ZIRCON 56 O Mark Urban, 1996 6 Springtime for Sceptics 70 Mark Urbar-r is hereby identified as author of 7 A Brilliant Intelligence Operation 84 this work in accordance with Section 77 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 8 The \7all Comes Tumbling Down 101 A CIP rccord for this book is available from the Part Two British Library 9 Supergun LL7 tsnN o-57r-r7689-5 10 Black Death on the Nevsky Prospekt L29 ll Assault on Kuwait L43 12 Desert Shield 153 13 Desert Storm 165 14 Moscow Endgame LA2 Part Three l5 An Accidcnt of History L97 l(r Irrlo thc ll:rllirrn 2LO tt),)B / (,1,1 l, I Qulgrnirc 17 Time for Revenge 22L lntroduction 18 Intelligence, Power and Economic Hegemony 232 19 Very Huge Bills 245 How good is British intelligence? What kind of a return do ministers and officials get 20 The Axe Falls 2il for the hundreds of millions of pounds spent on espionage each year? How does this secret establishment find direction and purpose 2l Irish Intrigues 269 in an age when old certainties have evaporated? Very few people, even in Conclusion 286 Whitehall, would feel confident enough to answer these questions.
    [Show full text]
  • UK National Archives Or (Mainly) 39
    Date: 20.04.2017 T N A _____ U.K. NATIONAL ARCHIVES (formerly known as the "PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE") NATIONAL ARCHIVES NATIONAL ARCHIVES Chancery Lane Ruskin Avenue London WC2A 1LR Kew Tel.(01)405 0741 Richmond Surrey TW9 4DU Tel.(01)876 3444 LIST OF FILES AT THE U.K. NATIONAL ARCHIVES, THE FORMER 'PRO' (PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE) FOR WHICH SOME INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE (IN MOST CASES JUST THE RECORD-TITLE) OR FROM WHICH COPIES WERE ALREADY OBTAINED. FILES LISTED REFER MAINLY TO DOCUMENTS WHICH MIGHT BE USEFUL TO A PERSON INTERESTED IN GERMAN WARSHIPS OF THE SECOND WORLD WAR AND RELATED SUBJECTS. THIS LIST IS NOT EXHAUSTIVE. RECORDS LISTED MAY BE SEEN ONLY AT THE NA, KEW. THERE ARE LEAFLETS (IN THE LOBBY AT KEW) ON MANY OF THE MOST POPULAR SUBJECTS OF STUDY. THESE COULD BE CHECKED ALSO TO SEE WHICH CLASSES OF RECORDS ARE LIKELY TO BE USEFUL. * = Please check the separate enclosure for more information on this record. Checks by 81 done solely with regard for attacks of escort vessels on Uboats. GROUP LIST ADM - ADMIRALTY ADM 1: Admiralty, papers of secretariat, operational records 7: Miscellaneous 41: Hired armed vessels, ships' muster books 51: HM surface ship's logs, till ADM54 inclusive 91: Ships and vessels 92: Signalling 93: Telecommunications & radio 116: Admiralty, papers of secretariat, operational records 136: Ship's books 137: Historical section 138: Ships' Covers Series I (transferred to NMM, Greenwhich) 173: HM submarine logs 177: Navy list, confidential edition 178: Sensitive Admiralty papers (mainly court martials) 179: Portsmouth
    [Show full text]
  • Bds the First Forty Years 1963-2003
    BDS THE FIRST FORTY YEARS 1963-2003 Four decades of work for the welfare of deer A Personal View and Memoir by Founder Member Peter Carne CHAPTERS 1. Why a British Deer Society? 2. The Deer Group 3. Birth of the BDS 4. Early days 5. Forging ahead 6. Onward and upward 7. Further Branch development 8. The Journal 9. Moving on 10. Spreading the load 11. Into the ‘70s 12. Celebrating a birthday 13. After the party 14. Growing pains 15. Going professional 16. Royal Patronage 17. Business as usual 18. So far so good 19. Into the 1980’s 20. Twenty years on 21. Ufton Nervet 22. Child-Beale 23. Happier times 24. The early 1990s 25. Our Fourth decade 26. Thirty years on 27. A new era 28. Changing times 29. A Company limited by Guarantee 30. 2000 not out! 31. All change! 32. Anniversary count down 33. Epilogue Appendix: Illustrations The British Deer Society accepts no responsibility for interpretations of fact or expressions of opinion in the accompanying text, which are entirely those of the author. Peter Carne has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identified as Author of this work. 2 1. Why a British Deer Society? THE FIRST HALF of the twentieth century was a dark age for British deer, in England especially. Two world wars and their aftermath saw the closure of very many ancient deer parks. Some were converted to farmland for wartime and post war food production. Others were requisitioned as sites for military camps or for other defence purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 North Quabbin Edition
    2020 North Quabbin Edition: Axis & Allies John Lake 4-12-2020 Table of contents Introduction to Nations…………………………………………………………… 3 Identifying the Map………………………………………………………………. 4 o Friendly………………….4 o Hostile………………..….4 o Occupied……………..….4 o Impassable…….………...4 o Neutral…….………….....5 o Internment……………….6 o Islands………………...…6 o Sea zones…………….…..6 o Straights and canals….…..6 Identifying the Game pieces……………………………………………………… 7 o Staring Bonus………….…..9 o Order of Play…….…...…....9 How to play……………………………………………………………………… 10 o Phase 1: Research and Development………….………………… 10 o Phase 2: Purchase Units………….……………………………… 12 o Phase 3: Combat Move………….…………………………….… 13 o Phase 4: Conduct Combat Move………….…………………….. 14 . Anti Air…………….. 15 . Bombardments……... 15 . Bribed Overflight……17 . Liberating terr/ cap….17 . Multinational forces…18 . Strategic Bombing…..18 . Sabotage…………….19 o Phase 5: Non-Combat Move………….………………………… 20 o Phase 6: Mobilize New Units………….…………..………….… 20 o Phase 7: Collect Income………….………………………...…… 20 Unit Profiles ………………………………………………………………………..20 o Infrastructure…………………… 21 o Rail Units……………………….. 24 o Land Units…………………...….. 27 o Air units…………..…………….. 37 o Sea Units………………………... 42 Automatic specials…………………………………………………………….... 50 National Specials……………………………………………………………….. 53 o Major Powers…………….…………53 o Minor Powers……………….………61 o Neutral Powers……………………...67 Operations/ Objectives…………………………………………………………. 74 o Resource Wars……………………...74 o Propaganda & Entertainment……….82 o Doolittle Raid……………………….84 o P.O.W.s……………………………..84 o Colossal Bridges……………………85 o Group Monson…………………..…88 o Operation Herkules ………………..88 Reference charts………………………………………………………………….89 2 Your World At War: Which Power Should I Play? Overall, the Axis powers begin stronger militarily but inferior economically to the Allies. They start with many combat forces in play but comparatively little buying power. The Allies individually have fewer combat forces, but with their combined incomes they have more resources than the Axis.
    [Show full text]
  • [16.0] Operation Herkules [17.0] DETACHMENTS
    6 The exact placement of MSU's and throw the British out of eastern Cyrenaica. The Add". dumps does, of course, depend on the Gazala campaign ensued. .. .2 if Ramcke Heavy Airborne Infamry specific situation. However, some concepts After Gazala, when the British army seemed to is cOl11miued are worth keeping in mind: (I) The closer a have been completely demolished and lhe way to .. 1 if Folgorc Glider Infantry is committed dump is to the units supplied by iI, Ihe better; the Nile dclla open, Rommel decided 10 use the (2) Supply lincs thaI run north-south are bel­ forces slotted for Herkules (the Sicilian Luftwaffe ... 1 for each Axis Air Point committcd (16.13) ter than ones that run east-west (this is in particular) in his drive o n Egypt. The Malta in­ Subtract. .. because a north-south line has a smaller vasion was .><:rapped, despite the overwhelming ... 1 for each Commonwealth Air point at Malta southern flank than an east-....·eSI line, and is opposition of [he German General St aff. Malta thus easier to protect from a nanking recovered, and its deleterious effect on Axis supply ... 2 if any Commonwealth unit is in General maneuver); (3) Always, always check that lines grew. Within a few months. more than a third Supply and west of Lxx23 your supply grid is Out of range of all enemy of the Axis materiel whie:h lOok .ship for Africa The Assaullindex is totalled. a~ld the die is rolled. units, regardless of whether or not such was falling prey [0 Allied interdiction.
    [Show full text]