DOCSLIB.ORG

Cold War Infrastructure for Strategic Air Command-The Bomber Mission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cold War Infrastructure for Strategic Air Command-The Bomber Mission COLD WAR INFRASTRUCTURE FOR STRATEGIC AIR COMMAND: THE BOMBER MISSION Prepared for Headquarters, Air Combat Command Langley Air Force Base, Virginia November 1999 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................ vii List of Acronyms ............................................................................................................................... ix Introduction....................................................................................................................................... xi Chapter 1: Cold War Events and the Operational Infrastructure of the Air Force.....................................1 1946-1950......................................................................................................................................1 The Germans ..............................................................................................................................1 The Major Commands and First Generation Infrastructure .............................................................3 ADC and ANG.........................................................................................................................4 SAC ........................................................................................................................................5 The 1950s.......................................................................................................................................6 Evolution of the Directorate of Civil Engineering ..........................................................................6 Achieving Standardized Design .................................................................................................7 Prefabricated Structures, the Steel Industry, and Mobilization......................................................8 The Major Commands and Second Generation Infrastructure .........................................................9 ADC and TAC .........................................................................................................................9 SAC ...................................................................................................................................... 11 After 1960.................................................................................................................................... 14 Chapter 2: Evolution of Key Property Types ...................................................................................... 19 First Generation Maintenance Hangar for the B-36 ......................................................................... 20 Second Generation Maintenance Hangar for the B-36, B-47, and B-52 ............................................. 35 Prefabricated, Mobilization Infrastructure....................................................................................... 62 Nose Docks, Temporary Shelters, and Wing Hangars .................................................................. 62 Prefabricated Airmen Dormitories .............................................................................................. 84 Pavement Experimentation for the Very Heavy Bomber.................................................................. 92 Q Areas........................................................................................................................................ 97 A Structures............................................................................................................................ 100 C Structure ............................................................................................................................. 104 Plants I and II (A and B).......................................................................................................... 104 Command and Control Building............................................................................................... 106 S Structure.............................................................................................................................. 106 Alert Apron Configurations and Crew Quarters ............................................................................ 107 Headquarters Command Post and the SAC Chapel........................................................................ 124 Command Post........................................................................................................................ 124 SAC Chapel............................................................................................................................ 126 Late Cold War SAC Infrastructure............................................................................................... 128 Chapter 3: Character-Defining Features and National Register Integrity ............................................. 145 First Generation Maintenance Hangar: the Thin-Shell, Concrete Structure...................................... 145 Second Generation Maintenance Hangar: the Steel, Double-Cantilever Series................................. 147 Prefabricated, Mobilization Infrastructure..................................................................................... 150 Wing Hangars......................................................................................................................... 150 SAC Airmen Dormitories......................................................................................................... 152 Experimental Pavement............................................................................................................... 153 Q Areas...................................................................................................................................... 154 Alert Aprons and Moleholes ........................................................................................................ 155 SAC Command Post and Chapel.................................................................................................. 158 Command Post........................................................................................................................ 158 Chapel.................................................................................................................................... 158 Late Cold War Infrastructure....................................................................................................... 158 i Chapter 4: Real Property Management of Historic SAC Infrastructure ............................................... 159 Barksdale Air Force Base ............................................................................................................ 161 Beale Air Force Base .................................................................................................................. 162 Cannon Air Force Base ............................................................................................................... 163 Davis-Monthan Air Force Base ................................................................................................... 164 Dyess Air Force Base.................................................................................................................. 165 Ellsworth Air Force Base ............................................................................................................ 166 Holloman Air Force Base ............................................................................................................ 167 Langley Air Force Base .............................................................................................................. 168 Minot Air Force Base.................................................................................................................. 169 Moody Air Force Base................................................................................................................ 170 Mountain Home Air Force Base .................................................................................................. 171 Nellis Air Force Base.................................................................................................................. 172 Offutt Air Force Base.................................................................................................................. 173 Seymour Johnson Air Force Base ................................................................................................ 174 Shaw Air Force Base .................................................................................................................. 175 Whiteman Air Force Base ........................................................................................................... 176 Chapter 5: Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 177 Current ACC Installations: Issues of Inventory ............................................................................. 178 Nose Docks and Wing Hangars................................................................................................ 178 Experimental Airfield Pavement............................................................................................... 178 Alert Crew Trailers.................................................................................................................. 178 Current ACC Real Property: Issues of Documents and Drawings ..................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cold War Infrastructure for Air Defense: the Fighter and Command Missions
    COLD WAR INFRASTRUCTURE FOR AIR DEFENSE: THE FIGHTER AND COMMAND MISSIONS Prepared for Headquarters, Air Combat Command Langley Air Force Base, Virginia November 1999 Table of Contents Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................................v List of Acronyms .............................................................................................................................vii Introduction......................................................................................................................................ix Chapter 1: Cold War Events and the Operational Infrastructure of the Air Force.....................................1 1946-1950......................................................................................................................................1 The Germans ..............................................................................................................................1 The Major Commands and First Generation Infrastructure .............................................................3 ADC and ANG........................................................................................................................4 SAC .......................................................................................................................................5 The 1950s.......................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Clovis Municipal Airport
    Clovis Municipal Airport BAirportigBear MasterCityAi Planrport Master Plan Planning Services BigBearCityAirport Master Plan Planning Services Prepared by: In association with AIRPORT MASTER PLAN for Clovis Municipal Airport Clovis, New Mexico Prepared for City of Clovis, New Mexico by KSA, Inc. in association with CDM Smith, Inc. DRAFT FINAL September 2015 The preparation of this document was financially support, in part, through a grant provided by the New Mexico Department of Transportation. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the NMDOT or Federal Aviation Administration. Acceptance of this report by the NMDOT or FAA does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the State of New Mexico or United States to participate in any development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable or would have justification in accordance with appropriate public laws. PLAN Table of Contents Chapter One: Inventory of Existing Conditions 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Overview of the Airport .......................................................................... 1-2 1.2.1 CVN Location .................................................................................1-2 1.2.2 CVN Sponsor Management ..............................................................1-4 1.2.3 CVN History ....................................................................................1-5
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage, Heroes, Horizons 50 Years of A/TA Tradition and Transformation
    AIRLIFT/TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 26 • Number 4 • Fall 2018 Heritage, Heroes, Horizons 50 Years of A/TA Tradition and Transformation Pages 14 2018 A/TA Awards Pages 25-58 A Salute to Our Industry Partners Pages 60-69 Table of Contents 2018 A/TA Board of Offi cers & Convention Staff ..................................................................... 2 A/TA UpFront Chairman’s Comments. ............................................................................................................. 4 President’s Message .................................................................................................................... 5 Secretary’s Notes ........................................................................................................................ 6 AIRLIFT/TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 26 • Number 4 • Fall 2018 The Inexorable March of Time, an article by Col. Dennis “Bud” Traynor, USAF ret ...................7 ISSN 2578-4064 Airlift/Tanker Quarterly is published four times a year by the Features Airlift/Tanker Association, 7983 Rhodes Farm Way, Chattanooga, A Welcome Message from Air Mobility Command Commader General Maryanne Miller ...... 8 Tennessee 37421. Postage paid at St. Louis, Missouri. Subscription rate: $40.00 per year. Change of address A Welcome Message from Air Mobility Command Chief Master Sergeant Larry C. Williams, Jr... 10 requires four weeks notice. The Airlift/Tanker Association is a non-profi t professional Cover Story organization dedicated to providing a forum for people Heritage, Heores, Horizons interested
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 161 CHAPTER 368 Be It Enacted Hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the ^^"'^'/Or^ C ^ United States Of
    324 PUBLIC LAW 161-JULY 15, 1955 [69 STAT. Public Law 161 CHAPTER 368 July 15.1955 AN ACT THa R 68291 *• * To authorize certain construction at inilitai-y, naval, and Air F<n"ce installations, and for otlier purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the an^^"'^'/ord Air Forc^e conc^> United States of America in Congress assembled^ struction TITLE I ^'"^" SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army is authorized to establish or develop military installations and facilities by the acquisition, con­ struction, conversion, rehabilitation, or installation of permanent or temporary public works in respect of the following projects, which include site preparation, appurtenances, and related utilities and equipment: CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES TECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITIES (Ordnance Corps) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Troop housing, community facilities, utilities, and family housing, $1,736,000. Black Hills Ordnance Depot, South Dakota: Family housing, $1,428,000. Blue Grass Ordnance Depot, Kentucky: Operational and mainte­ nance facilities, $509,000. Erie Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Operational and maintenance facilities and utilities, $1,933,000. Frankford Arsenal, Pennsylvania: Utilities, $855,000. LOrdstown Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Operational and maintenance facilities, $875,000. Pueblo Ordnance Depot, (^olorado: Operational and maintenance facilities, $1,843,000. Ked River Arsenal, Texas: Operational and maintenance facilities, $140,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama: Research and development facilities and community facilities, $2,865,000. E(.>ck Island Arsenal, Illinois: Operational and maintenance facil­ ities, $347,000. Rossford Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Utilities, $400,000. Savanna Ordnance Depot, Illinois: Operational and maintenance facilities, $342,000. Seneca Ordnance Depot, New York: Community facilities, $129,000.
    [Show full text]
  • 80 Stat.] Public Law 89-568-Sept
    80 STAT.] PUBLIC LAW 89-568-SEPT. 12, 1966 739 Public Law 89-568 AN ACT September 12, 1966 To authorize certain construction at military installations, and for other 1^^' ^^Q^l purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. Military con- ' £7 7 struction Aufhori- zation Act, 1967. TITLE I SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop mill- ^'^^• tary installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, converting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including site preparations, appurtenances, utilities, and equipment for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES CONTINENTAL ARMY COMMAND (First Army) Fort Devens, Massachusetts: Troop housing, $7,117,000. Fort Dix, New Jersey: Training facilities, $1,914,000. Fort Eustis, Virginia: Training facilities, maintenance facilities, and troop housing, $957,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky: Training facilities, $2,470,000. United States Military Academy, West Point, New York: Training facilities, storage facilities, and utilities, $2,451,000. (Third Army) Armed Forces Examining Entrance Station, Montgomery, Ala­ bama : Administrative facilities, $235,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky: Operational facilities, $355,000. Fort Gordon, Georgia: Troop housing, $12,630,000. Fort Jackson, South Carolina: Training facilities, and utilities, $4,072,000. Fort Rucker, Alabama: Operational facilities, $318,000. (Fourth Army) Fort Bliss, Texas: Maintenance facilities, and research, develop­ ment, and test facilities, $1,636,000. Fort Chaffee, Arkansas: Utilities, $225,000. Fort Hood, Texas: Training facilities, and utilities, $1,871,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana: Training facilities, $861,000. Fort Wolters, Texas: Training facilities, $1,026,000.
    [Show full text]
  • M1:Litlqry Law Review
    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PAMPHLET 27-1 00-22 M1:LITLQRY LAW REVIEW GOVER?;\IEST C.41 SED IIEL.4TS I\ THE PERFORhIANCE OF FEDERXI, COSTRICT.5 THE I>IPr\CT OF THE COSTRACT CLAL‘S E 5 Ifajor Robert B. Clarke PL-BLIC POLICt- .4TD PHIV.ITE PEACE-THE FINALITY OF .4 JLDICI 4L DETER>IIS.ITION Caprain .li’attheu B. O’Donnell, Jr. THE DEVIL‘S ARTICLE Wing Commander D. R. .i’zchols IIILTT>iRY LA%- 13 SP.4IN Brigadier General Eduardo De IVO Louis THE IAK OF THE SF-4: A P.4RALLEL FOR SPACE LAW Captain lack H. Pilltanas FIVE -YE A R C KvIL LXT I V E IN DES PREFACE The Military Law Review is designed to provide a medium for those interested in the field of military law to share the product of their experience and research with their fellow lawyers. Articles should be of direct concern and import in this area of scholarship, and preference will be given to those articles having lasting value as reference material for the military lawyer. The Militury Law Review does not purport to promulgate De- partment of the Army policy or to be in any sense directory. The opinions reflected in each article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Judge Advocate General or the Department of the Army. Articles, comments, and notes should be submitted in duplicate, triple spaced, to the Editor, Military Law Review, The Judge Ad- vocate General’s School, U. s. Army, Charlottesville, Virginia. Footnotes should be triple spaced, set out on pages separate from the text and follow the manner of citation in the Harvurd Blue Book.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Rates & Charges Survey
    AIRPORT RATES & CHARGES SURVEY 2021 Table of Contents About the Survey 2-5 Respondent Information 6-13 Regional Survey Results 14-22 Survey Results by State 23-41 1 2020 General Aviation Airports Rates & Charges Survey In 2020, KSA undertook a robust data collection effort for our Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Southwest Region airport sponsors. The results of this survey are intended to be a resource for aviation professionals regarding general aviation airport rates and charges across all categories and provide a clearinghouse for regional comparisons. Rest assured, no individual airport data will be published. The airport data has been complied to create a composite of airport types for your reference and use. Each participating airport will receive a copy of the survey results. We are preparing this survey as a service to airports within our region. Thank you to those that participated. We believe this will benefit our colleagues and peers in the airport industry looking to benchmark their respective market areas and remain competitive in developing sustainable revenue sources at their facility. ABOUT US: Founded in 1978, KSA provides a broad range of consulting, management, engineering, architecture, planning, surveying, and construction services to our clients across the south-central United States. As a firm, KSA’s primary work portfolio includes non-hub commercial service and general airports in the Southwest Region. We have completed over a thousand projects at hundreds of aviation facilities including Commercial Service, Reliever, and General Aviation airports. More at www.ksaeng.com 2 Aviation Rates & Fee 2020 INTRO Welcome to KSA’s inaugural issue of the Aviation Rates & Fees for Southwest region General Aviation Airports.
    [Show full text]
  • E Sandia Corporation Observes Ten Year Anniversary Nov. 1, History Told in Nuclear Weapons Program Ten Years Isn't a Very Long Time
    • SANDIA LABORATORY today presents an imposing out of camera view, right center. The increase in num• 1949. Today the facilities at Sandia Base are valued at array of large, permanent-type buildings. The old ber of buildings constructed by the AEC for use by $70,000,000 and still growing. Aerial photograph taken hangar shown in the historical picture on page 3 is just Sandia has been steady throughout the years since by C. F. Wilson, Optical Measurements Division 5216. e Sandia Corporation Observes Ten Year Anniversary Nov. 1, History Told in Nuclear Weapons Program Ten years isn't a very long time. the contract for operating San• However, Sandia Corporation's dia Laboratory. On July 11, decade of history in the nuclear 1949, the U. S. Atomic Energy weapons program takes in much Commission announced t h at of the atomic a ge. Western E I e c t ric Company November 1, 1949, was the day would be the successor to the of the founding of Sandia Cor• University. poration. The history of Sandia The Western Electric Company Laboratory started a few years established Sandia Corporation as prior to that. a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sandia Laboratory was found• Western Electric to operate the ed on Sandia Base, Albuquerque, Laboratory under the provisions of in 1945 as a facility of the Uni• a non-profit contract which had versity of California's Los Ala• been negotiated with the AEC. mos Scientific Laboratory. In On the first day of November, published every other friday for the employees of undia corporation, contractor to the atomic energy commission early 1949 the regents of the 10 years ago, Sandia Corporation University of California express• assumed operation of the Labora• VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • LORING AIR FORCE BASE, ALERT AREA Southeeatern Portion of Base
    LORING AIR FORCE BASE, ALERT AREA HAER No. ME-64-E Southeeatern portion of base; east of southern end of runway Limestone Vicinity Aroostook County Maine WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA PHOTOGRAPHS HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service Northeast Region Philadelphia Support Office U.S. Custom House 200 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD LORING AIR FORCE BASE, ALERT AREA HAERNO.ME-64-E Location: Southeastern portion of base; east of southern end of runway Limestone Vicinity Aroostook County, Maine USGS 7.5-minute Fort Fairfield NW Quadrangle Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates 1) 19:585655.5198881; 2) 19:585828.5198728; 3) 19:585797.5198480; 4) 19:585275.5198277; Pate(s) of Construction: 1959-1986 Architects: Leo A. Daly Company, Hoyle, Tanner & Associates, Inc., Alonzo B. Reed, Inc. Present Owner(s): United States Air Force Air Force Base Conversion Agency (AFBCA) - Loring RR1, Box 1719 Limestone, Maine 04750-7943 Present Occupants: Vacant Present Use: Vacant Significance: The design of the structures in the Alert Area at Loring Air Force Base (AFB) represents special, strategic modifications of standard Air Force design in response to Soviet weapons advancements. The Alert Area is the physical embodiment of the Strategic Air Command (SAC) Alert mission, and continues to convey its Cold War character. The mission - critical structures of the Alert Area clearly represent the Ground Alert concept of SAC. All aspects of the duty are illustrated: living in close quarters, working with top-secret materials, quick and easy access to aircraft, high-security operations, and swift execution of the takeoff of the alert force in time of emergency.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DOD Is Beefing up Operations at Andersen Air Force Base and Throughout the Marianas
    ccess is the name of the game for security in the Pacific. For airmen, this access hinges on Guam. Guam is an American pos- session—US soil. While there are many other desirable bas- Aing locations in the western Pacific, Guam—nearly 220 square miles of sov- ereign American territory about 3,900 miles west of Hawaii—is the only one where basing rights will never be an issue. Andersen Air Force Base, at the north- ern tip of the island, is a historic instal- lation. The main runway is famous for its dip in the center, an ocean cliff at the end, and its white color—radiating from crushed coral mixed in the concrete. Andersen hosted US combat aircraft in World War II and throughout the Vietnam War and the Cold War. For the last 10 years, USAF has been increasing its presence on Guam. So has the Navy, which homeports submarines there, and plans call for some Marine Corps aviation and ground units from Okinawa to move to a new home on the island. The strategic importance of Guam extends to other territories in the Marianas island chain such as Tinian and Saipan. President Obama’s Asia-Pacific rebal- ance leans heavily on Guam for access, transient staging, and presence. “What many people do not realize is that it sits at the tip of the spear for the defense of our nation and is woven into the strategic fabric of the Pacific theater,” noted Rep. Solomon Ortiz (D- Tex.) in 2009. The Guam Hub Before airpower, the Northern Mari- anas were the site of Spanish imperial stopovers and Japanese occupation.
    [Show full text]