Swan and Canning Rivers Foreshore Assessment and Management Strategy10.04 MB

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Swan and Canning Rivers Foreshore Assessment and Management Strategy10.04 MB Swan and Canning Rivers Foreshore Assessment and Management Strategy March 2008 Table of Contents Preface.......................................................................................................................................1 1.1 The Swan River Trust...................................................................................................1 1.2 About this Document ....................................................................................................1 2 Executive Summary............................................................................................................3 2.1 Riverbanks and Shoreline Issues .................................................................................3 2.2 Vegetation Issues.........................................................................................................7 2.3 Strategies for Management ........................................................................................10 2.4 Management Priorities................................................................................................12 3 Foreshore Assessment .....................................................................................................17 3.1 Overall Approach........................................................................................................17 3.2 Riverbank and Shoreline Assessment ........................................................................17 3.3 Vegetation Assessment..............................................................................................50 4 Foreshore Strategy ...........................................................................................................81 4.1 Approach....................................................................................................................81 4.2 Riverbanks and Shoreline Issues and Management...................................................82 4.3 Priorities for Action - Riverbanks and Shorelines ........................................................86 4.4 Vegetation Issues and Management ........................................................................110 4.5 Priorities for Action–Vegetation.................................................................................113 4.6 Summary: Priority Sites for Management .................................................................148 5 References .....................................................................................................................152 6 Appendices.....................................................................................................................154 Preface 1.1 The Swan River Trust The Swan River Trust works in collaboration with the Commonwealth and various State, and local government agencies, community and industry organisations to deliver two important outcomes: 1. The long-term community benefit of the Swan Canning river system is protected and enhanced; and 2. The ecological health of the Swan Canning river system is protected and enhanced. The replacement of the Swan River Trust Act 1988 and the Environmental Protection (Swan and Canning Rivers) Policy 1997 with the Swan and Canning Rivers Management Act (proclaimed September 2006) improves the State's ability to manage activities that may affect the Swan and Canning rivers. This will enable management issues such as maintaining biodiversity, facilitating commercial and recreational use of the waterways, and conserving indigenous and European heritage to be more effectively addressed. The new legislation recognises the importance of the rivers as an icon of Perth by establishing the Swan Canning Riverpark. Riverpark consists of the waterways and adjacent Crown land reserves of the Swan, Canning, Helena and Southern rivers (private property is not included in Riverpark). The legislation makes the Trust responsible for the waterways, establishes joint management arrangements for shorelines, and requires preparation of a Riverpark Management Program to integrate management of the waterways and the adjacent reserves along the foreshore. Since January 2002, the Trust, through its Riverbank Program, has worked with local and State government land managers to initiate foreshore protection and rehabilitation projects within its management area. The Trust will contine to work in partnership with local and State government to maintain and improve Riverpark foreshore areas. 1.2 About this Document The Swan River Trust has long recognised that to effectively manage the Swan Canning foreshores and allocate investments, a good understanding of the foreshore condition and threatening processes is required. In 2002, the Trust successfully sought funding through the Natural Heritage Trust to undertake an ecological and physical assessment of the Swan Canning foreshores and subsequently established a ‘Foreshore Assessment’ project in partnership with the Swan Catchment Council. That project was aimed at: • identifying condition and pressures; • making recommendations for management; • identifying priorities for investment; and • providing a benchmark for future evaluation. This document represents a culmination of that project and is divided into two major parts. The first part summarises the findings of the Foreshore Assessment, describing foreshores, their pressures and condition. The second part of this document is a management strategy which summarises the foreshore issues, defines management responses and identifies priorities for action. 1 Throughout this document, the riverbanks and shorelines are considered separately from the foreshore vegetation. This is deliberate and consistent with the two objectives of the Swan River Trust’s Riverbank Program: • To protect and enhance riverbanks and shorelines to mitigate threats to foreshore values; and • To protect, enhance and manage fringing indigenous vegetation and habitat. The Foreshore Strategy is intended as a guide for investment. It is neither an investment plan, nor a strategic plan for the Trust as a whole. Recommendations of the Foreshore Strategy will be considered and implemented through the Trust Riverbank Program under the Healthy Rivers Action Plan, and also through the Swan Catchment Council investment plans for the NHT3. Implementation is also through existing State and local government plans and community action plans. The Foreshore Assessment accounts for the current condition and pressures on riverbanks and shorelines and their associated vegetation. Management strategies are focussed on addressing these. The Foreshore Assessment, and thereby the Strategy, does not account for the potential impacts of climate change. It is too early to reliably anticipate the pace of any systemic change that will be forced by climate. However, it is expected that climate change will result in increased sea levels and storm surges within the Swan and Canning rivers. Therefore, the risk of erosion or inundation in some areas would be expected to increase beyond that identified in this document. In areas where that risk is high, it will become increasingly important to ensure that infrastructure is adequately protected, and to improve the stability of shorelines using appropriate techniques where necessary. It will also be important to ensure that adequate setbacks are in place to enable the shorelines and associated vegetation to adapt to the physical changes that they will encounter. Climate change is also likely to exacerbate sedimentation where streamflows decline, thereby increasing pressure on areas where this problem already exists. In addition, climate change is likely to change the distribution and abundance of fringing vegetation from which is recorded here. An important recommendation of the recent report on climate change in the Swan and Canning rivers (Technical Advisory Panel 2007) was the need for an assessment of the vulnerablility of foreshore areas to provide the basis for determining future planning setbacks, managing foreshore vegetation and erosion, and designing erosion control measures. This document and the associated database provide the benchmark against which future change can be measured and vulnerability under different scenarios evaluated. 2 2 Executive Summary The Swan and Canning Rivers Foreshore Assessment divided the river into three zones (Figure 2.1). The zones are: 1. Estuary: Perth and Melville Waters downstream of the Causeway and Mount Henry Bridges (Zone 1); 2. Swan: Swan, Helena and Lower Avon rivers upstream of the Causeway and within the Swan River Trust Management Area (Zone 2); and 3. Canning: Canning and Southern rivers upstream of Mount Henry Bridge within the Swan River Trust Development Control Area (Zone 3). In each zone, the condition and pressures of the shoreline (both built and non-built) and vegetation were documented. Information compiled as part of the Foreshore Assessment was then used as the basis for developing a management strategy. The strategy makes recommendations for management response within two overarching objectives, which are: • To protect and enhance riverbanks and shorelines to mitigate threats to foreshore values; and • To protect, enhance and manage fringing indigenous vegetation and habitat. Within the first objective the term ‘shoreline’ is defined as the area two metres either side of the high water mark (Swan Canning Rivers Management Act 2006). This is used in combination with the term ‘riverbank’ to acknowledge the spatial extent of foreshores and their
Recommended publications
  • Swan and Helena Rivers Management Framework Heritage Audit and Statement of Significance • FINAL REPORT • 26 February 2009
    Swan and Helena Rivers Management Framework Heritage Audit and Statement of Significance • FINAL REPORT • 26 FEbRuARy 2009 REPORT CONTRIBUTORS: Alan Briggs Robin Chinnery Laura Colman Dr David Dolan Dr Sue Graham-Taylor A COLLABORATIVE PROJECT BY: Jenni Howlett Cheryl-Anne McCann LATITUDE CREATIVE SERVICES Brooke Mandy HERITAGE AND CONSERVATION PROFESSIONALS Gina Pickering (Project Manager) NATIONAL TRUST (WA) Rosemary Rosario Alison Storey Prepared FOR ThE EAsTERN Metropolitan REgIONAL COuNCIL ON bEhALF OF Dr Richard Walley OAM Cover image: View upstream, near Barker’s Bridge. Acknowledgements The consultants acknowledge the assistance received from the Councillors, staff and residents of the Town of Bassendean, Cities of Bayswater, Belmont and Swan and the Eastern Metropolitan Regional Council (EMRC), including Ruth Andrew, Dean Cracknell, Sally De La Cruz, Daniel Hanley, Brian Reed and Rachel Thorp; Bassendean, Bayswater, Belmont and Maylands Historical Societies, Ascot Kayak Club, Claughton Reserve Friends Group, Ellis House, Foreshore Environment Action Group, Friends of Ascot Waters and Ascot Island, Friends of Gobba Lake, Maylands Ratepayers and Residents Association, Maylands Yacht Club, Success Hill Action Group, Urban Bushland Council, Viveash Community Group, Swan Chamber of Commerce, Midland Brick and the other community members who participated in the heritage audit community consultation. Special thanks also to Anne Brake, Albert Corunna, Frances Humphries, Leoni Humphries, Oswald Humphries, Christine Lewis, Barry McGuire, May McGuire, Stephen Newby, Fred Pickett, Beverley Rebbeck, Irene Stainton, Luke Toomey, Richard Offen, Tom Perrigo and Shelley Withers for their support in this project. The views expressed in this document are the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the EMRC.
    [Show full text]
  • Swamp : Walking the Wetlands of the Swan Coastal Plain
    Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses: Doctorates and Masters Theses 2012 Swamp : walking the wetlands of the Swan Coastal Plain ; and with the exegesis, A walk in the anthropocene: homesickness and the walker-writer Anandashila Saraswati Edith Cowan University Recommended Citation Saraswati, A. (2012). Swamp : walking the wetlands of the Swan Coastal Plain ; and with the exegesis, A walk in the anthropocene: homesickness and the walker-writer. Retrieved from https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/588 This Thesis is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/588 Edith Cowan University Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorize you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. USE OF THESIS This copy is the property of Edith Cowan University. However, the literary rights of the author must also be respected. If any passage from this thesis is quoted or closely paraphrased in a paper of written work prepared by the user, the source of the passage must be acknowledged in the work.
    [Show full text]
  • New Perth Stadium Transport Project Definition Plan December 2012
    new Perth Stadium Transport Project Definition Plan December 2012 Artist’s impression: pedestrian bridge location 0ii transport solution for the new Perth Stadium transport solution for the new Perth Stadium Artist’s impression: new Perth Stadium Station 03 contents key features 2 Appendix 1 19 Dedicated train services 2 Transport facilities to be funded Complementary bus services 3 by the Government Pedestrian connection to CBD 3 Appendix 2 19 Enhancing existing infrastructure 3 Indicative cashflow evolution of the transport solution 4 executive summary 6 Project Definition Outcomes 7 Infrastructure 15 Importance of rigour 16 Cost Estimates 16 Project Management 17 Staging 17 Cashflow 17 01 key features Passengers first. Holistic transport approach. Multiple transport options. The new Perth Stadium By applying the ‘tentacles of movement’ presents an opportunity for philosophy, spectators will be dispersed, rather than surging together in one the Public Transport Authority direction, ensuring fast and safe transfers (PTA) to concurrently develop and reducing the impacts on nearby the transport solution within residential and environmental areas. a new precinct at Burswood, Key features of the responsive and rather than retrofit it into a robust transport solution, to be delivered constrained space. for the start of the 2018 AFL season, include: Adopting the new Perth Stadium’s ‘fan first’ philosophy, the Transport Dedicated train services PDP reflects passenger needs and Six-platform Stadium Station for demands to create a ‘passenger first’ convenient loading and rapid transfers transport solution. to destinations. This will be achieved through Nearby stowage for up to 117 railcars a $298 million (July 2011 prices) to keep a continuous flow of trains integrated train, bus and pedestrian following events.
    [Show full text]
  • Achievement Ride Routes 2015
    ACHIEVEMENT RIDE ROUTES 2015 50 km Achievement Ride From Burswood take the bike path along South Perth foreshore, under the Narrows Bridge and onto the Kwinana Freeway shared path to Success. Turn off at Armadale Rd to Success (Cockburn Gateway) shops for refreshments. Return to Burswood reverse route. 75 km Achievement Ride From Burswood take the bike path along South Perth foreshore, under the Narrows Bridge and onto Kwinana Freeway shared path to Success (Cockburn Gateway) shops for a coffee break. Return to bike path and continue south to Thomas Rd. The Shell Service Station on Thomas Road 150 m west of the Freeway sells food. Return to Burswood reverse route. 100 km Achievement Ride From Burswood take the bike path along South Perth foreshore under Narrows Bridge and onto Kwinana Freeway bike path south to Baldivis. Turn off at Safety Bay Rd to Hungry Jacks, 650 m west of the Freeway. Return to Burswood reverse route. 150 km Achievement Ride From Burswood take the bike path along South Perth foreshore under Narrows Bridge and onto Kwinana Freeway bike path south to Baldivis. Turn off at Safety Bay Rd to Hungry Jacks, 650 m west of Freeway. Top up water here as there are no water stops along the route south. Return to freeway bike path & continue south. Distances below are from Hungry Jacks. Left through tunnel under road at 23 km Turning point for 150 km is the Nambeelup Brook Bridge at 25 km. Return to Burswood reverse route. 200 km Achievement Ride From Burswood take the bike path along South Perth foreshore under Narrows Bridge and onto the Kwinana Freeway bike path south to Baldivis.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycle Count Data 2014/15
    Cycle count data 2014/15 Introduction Perth’s cycle network is monitored using 34 permanent bicycle counters located primarily on PSPs and RSPs in the Perth Metropolitan Area (Appendix A). These counters provide an accurate, continuous count of bicycle riders at each of the counter locations. The counters have been installed progressively since mid-2008 as the network has developed. While the counters provide an accurate picture of cycling at the counter sites there are numerous cycling routes which are not captured in the current counter network. For this reason, the analysis within this section should be considered as indicative rather than definitive indicators of cycling trends in the Perth Metropolitan Area. Overall Indicators Perth CBD Cycling travel into and out of the Perth Central Business District (CBD) is estimated using eight counters located on the CBD periphery (ten from 2014/15). These sites represent an incomplete cordon of cyclist movements into and out of the CBD, particularly on the road network towards North Perth. They will underestimate the amount of cycling activity into and out of the Perth CBD. During 2014/15 there was an average of 10,500 riders crossing the Perth CBD cordon per day across the ten sites, increasing to 11,200 on weekdays (Figure 1.1). Overall, there has been a decrease in cycling across the cordon of 4% between 2013/14 and 2014/15. Most of the decrease is attributable to a 5% decline in weekday cycling demand; weekend demand has been stable over the period. Figure 1.1: Average daily cyclists across the Perth CBD cordon Cycle count data 2014/15 Page 1 of 13 Almost all of the decrease in cycling across the Perth CBD cordon can be attributed to very substantial decreases in cycling at the Narrows Bridge east abutment and Riverside Drive at Causeway Bridge (Figure 1.3).
    [Show full text]
  • A Boating Guide for the Swan Canning Riverpark
    MITCHELL CRESCENT WALCOTT RD 5 Knots WHATLEY Garratt Road Bridge 2.8 Ascot Racecourse STREET Bardon Park STREET GUILDFORD GRANDSTAND VINCENT STREET Maylands Yacht Club City Beach Hospital MAYLANDS ST ANNES ASCOT STREET S.F. ASCOT STREET 8 Knots WATERS 5 Knots BULWER Special Closed Waters Motorised Vessels BEAUFORT SEA SCOUTS FREEWAY STREET Banks Grove Farm Y Y Y Reserve Tranby House Boat Ruins Reserve AERODROME 5 Knots Belmont Park ts BELGRAVIA ST PARADE POWERHOUSE Jetty Ruins o Racecourse Slipway n Overhead Power K MAYLANDS WILLIAM 8 Lines 132kV WEST 11·5 BUNBURY BRIDGE MARKET NEWCASTLE PERTH T STREET S MURRAY ST A E HAY WELLINGTON Windan Bridge Telephone Goongoongup 3.9 STREET Bridge ST BELMONT STREET CAUTION Water STREET Clarkson Reserve STREET Foul Ground Ski Maylands GEORGE 9 Submerged Piles Boat Ramp Area LEGEND 5 knots 270.1° Claisebrook BELMONT LORD 3 5 Knots Cove HIGHWAY Indicates STREET Hardey Park 5 Knot Area safe water MURRAY to the North Bldg (conspic) Belmont Jetty (260) HAY Hospital Boat Shed North STREET Cracknell Park 8 Knot Area N ER Y Closed Waters ST RIVERVALE EA WILLIAM Motorised Vessels 8 Knots for vessels PERTH STREET Gloucester Park over 20m only SHENTON PARK AVE Indicates STREET EAST PERTH BURSWOOD 12 safe water Reservoir BARRACK AVE Barrack St ADELAIDE to the South Jetties WAC Water Ski Area South SWAN AND CANNING RIVERS STREET APBA VICTORIA Speed Foul RIVERSIDE LATHLAIN Non Public Memorial TCE Boat Water Ski Area A boating guide for the Swan Canning Riverpark Kings Park Langley Area Military Exercise Narrows
    [Show full text]
  • South Perth Bike Plan 2012 / 2017 Final Report Prepared by Lamwise May 2012 South Perth Bike Plan 2012-17
    South Perth Bike Plan 2012 / 2017 Final Report Prepared by Lamwise May 2012 South Perth Bike Plan 2012-17 Contents Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………………….. 2 1.0 Introduction .....................………………………….…...………………….………. 4 2.0 Background ………………………………………..…..…….…………………..….. 5 3.0 Context ………………………………………………………………………………. 7 4.0 The Current Bicycle Network ………………………………………….………… 8 5.0 Deficiencies ………………………………………………………………………… 14 Map – Existing Network ….………………………………………………………………. 15 6.0 Planning Considerations ………………………………...............………………. 16 7.0 Proposed Bicycle Network (Vision) …………………………….………..……. 19 Map – Local Network Changes ……...………………………………………………….. 25 Map – Proposed Network ...………….………………………………………………….. 28 8.0 Connections to Adjacent Councils ………………………………………..…… 29 9.0 Bicycle Parking ………………………………………………………………..…… 31 10.0 Infrastructure Implementation Plan .………………………….…………..…… 34 Priority 1 Projects (2012/13) ……………………………....……………………..……… 34 Priority 2 Projects (2013/14) …..…………..…………………………..………………… 35 Priority 3 Projects (2014/15) ……………..……………………………………………… 36 Priority 4 Projects (2015/16) ……………..……………………………………………… 38 Priority 5 Projects (2016/17) …………...………….…………………………………….. 40 Map – Implementation Priorities ……………………………………………………….. 43 11.0 Best Practice ……………...…………………………………….…………………. 44 12.0 Recommendations …..………………………………....……………………..…. 47 Appendix 1 – Policy Context Specifics Appendix 2 – Road Network Inventory Appendix 3 – Path Network Inventory 1 South Perth Bike Plan 2012-17 Executive Summary The South Perth Bike
    [Show full text]
  • Receding Hairline
    Perth Hash House Harriers - Receding Hairline www.perthhash.com Run : Hare: Co-Hare: Run Comments: 1046 26 February 1990 Sawbones 1047 5 March 1990 Committee Harriettes 1048 12 March 1990 Bazza 1049 19 March 1990 Crater 1050 26 March 1990 Ee Aarr 1051 2 April 1990 Me Mate 1052 9 April 1990 Stumbles 1053 16 April 1990 Polecat 1056 7 June 1990 (Thu) Committee H4 1057 14 May 1990 Brutus 1058 21 May 1990 Shakin 1059 28 May 1990 Christ 1060 4 June 1990 Shylock 1061 11 June 1990 Jaapie 1062 18 June 1990 Galloping Gillie 1063 25 June 1990 Polly Bushranger 1064 2 July 1990 Arab 1065 9 July 1990 Iceman 1066 16 July 1990 Committee Bullsbrook 666 run 1067 23 July 1990 Wagon 1068 30 July 1990 Flyboy 1069 6 August 1990 Sir Tom Dunnee Arse 1070 13 August 1990 Aids 1071 20 August 1990 Budgie 1072 27 August 1990 Mumbles 1073 3 September 1990 Wombat 1074 10 September 1990 Emu 1075 17 September 1990 Raindrops 1077 2 October 1990 (Tue) Lumpy Mr Wong 1078 8 October 1990 Scrooge Barney 1079 15 October 1990 Growie Dazza 1080 22 October 1990 Bo Derek Twohill 1081 29 October 1990 Chunder 1082 5 November 1990 Mafia 1083 12 November 1990 Dulux 1084 19 November 1990 Slack 1085 26 November 1990 Ankles 1086 3 December 1990 Haggis Antman 1087 10 December 1990 Chalkie 1088 17 December 1990 Doc 1089 24 December 1990 Stumbles Kong 1090 30 December 1990 (Sun) Dunnee 1091 1 January 1991 (Tue) Cans 1092 14 January 1991 Radio Ron 1093 21 January 1991 Sir Tom Arse 1094 29 January 1991 (Tue) Kong Cans 19-Oct-20 www.perthhash.com 1 Perth Hash House Harriers - Receding Hairline www.perthhash.com Run : Hare: Co-Hare: Run Comments: 1095 4 February 1991 Deke Ol' Wares 1096 11 February 1991 Ol' Wares Jungle 1097 18 February 1991 Committee 1098 25 February 1991 Brutus John Roberts 1099 4 March 1991 Committee Palace Run 1100 11 March 1991 Louie the Colonel Fly 1101 18 March 1991 Waterworks A.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Australian Bicycle Network Plan 2014-2031 MINISTER’S FOREWORD
    Western Australian Bicycle Network Plan 2014-2031 MINISTER’S FOREWORD It gives me great pleasure to release the Western Australian Bicycle Network Plan 2014-2031, to guide the expansion of metropolitan and regional cycling facilities in this State. The number of Perth people cycling to work, or The WABN Plan includes a number of new for pleasure, has increased more than fivefold initiatives. The initiatives include a Connecting over the past 15 years and this trend is expected Schools program and a Connecting Stations to continue as more Western Australians reap the program, which both target regular short trips and environmental, social and health benefits offered are expected to deliver strong community benefits by choosing bicycles for business or leisure trips. by improving the health of our community while In 2012/13 alone, the number of cycling trips to also reducing congestion at key locations during and from the Perth Central Business District peak drop-off and pick-up periods. (CBD) increased by 16.4 per cent. For the Perth area there will be a continued focus In meeting Western Australia’s rising demand for on building Principal Shared Paths along freeways paths and on-road facilities for cyclists, the WABN and railway lines, prioritising those within a 15 km Plan will guide the continued delivery of cycling radius of the Perth CBD. The aim is to provide infrastructure to better meet the growing need commuters with a viable alternative transport for convenient, safe cycling routes and end-of- mode which is safe and reduces reliance on trip facilities, whilst aligning with the current State motorised transport in areas carrying high volumes Government urban planning policy and directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Swan and Helena Rivers Regional Recreational Path Development Plan – February 2009
    Swan and Helena Rivers Regional Recreational Path Development Plan Prepared for On behalf of February 2009 Swan and Helena Rivers Regional Recreational Path Development Plan – February 2009 Swan and Helena Rivers Regional Recreational Path Development Plan On behalf of Prepared by February 2009 Transplan Pty Ltd 2 Swan and Helena Rivers Regional Recreational Path Development Plan – February 2009 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 RECOMMENDATIONS 8 1.0 - BACKGROUND TO THIS PROJECT 10 2.0 - PROJECT OBJECTIVES 12 3.0 - METHODOLOGY 14 4.0 – THE EXISTING TRAIL/PATHWAY NETWORK 15 5.0 - PATH LOCATION DESIGN GUIDELINES 16 5.1 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE TRAILS 16 5.2 ROUTE ALIGNMENT GUIDELINES – BOTANY BAY TRAIL 17 5.3 EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE GREENWAY TRAIL ALIGNMENTS - WILLAMETTE (RIVER) GREENWAY TRAIL 19 5.4 ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES FOR DUAL-USE PATHS 20 5.5 PHYSICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS 20 5.6 HERITAGE AUDIT AND STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 23 6.0 – THE MISSING LINKS IN THE PATHWAY NETWORK 25 6.1 TOWN OF BASSENDEAN 25 6.2 CITY OF BAYSWATER 25 6.3 CITY OF BELMONT 26 6.4 CITY OF SWAN 26 7.0 - UPGRADING OF EXISTING PATHWAYS 28 7.1 TOWN OF BASSENDEAN 28 7.2 CITY OF BAYSWATER 28 7.3 CITY OF BELMONT 28 7.4 CITY OF SWAN 29 8.0 – DETERMINING PRIORITIES 30 9.0 - TRAIL WORKS LISTS AND INDICATIVE COST ESTIMATES 32 9.1 TOWN OF BASSENDEAN 32 9.2 CITY OF BAYSWATER 33 9.3 CITY OF BELMONT 33 9.4 CITY OF SWAN 35 9.5 SIGNAGE COSTS 36 9.6 TOTAL COSTS 37 10.0 - PATH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Perth Water Buneenboro Precinct Plan
    Perth Water Buneenboro Precinct Plan September 2019 Ngala kaaditj Whadjuk moort keyen kaadak nidja boodja We acknowledge the Whadjuk people as the original owners of this land Prepared for: Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, on behalf of the Perth Water Vision Group Project Team: Lead consultant: element – place strategy, engagement, heritage, urban planning Consultant team: Syrinx – environmental planning, landscape design Arup – transport planning and engineering Dr Richard Walley and David Collard – Aboriginal engagement and advisory Front page image: element “The river has long been a hub for our people. It is our church, our university, our shopping centre and our playground.” Dr. Richard Walley, Noongar elder Photo: Sharon Morskate Contents Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................................................1 Document purpose and structure ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Precinct Plan policy area ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Vision .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Condition of the Swan Canning Estuary in 2015, Based on the Fish Community Indices of Estuarine Condition
    Assessment of the condition of the Swan Canning Estuary in 2015, based on the Fish Community Indices of estuarine condition. Final report July 2015 Chris Hallett and James Tweedley Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research, Murdoch University Prepared for the Department of Parks and Wildlife Fish Community Index: Condition of the Swan Canning Estuary 2015 Disclaimer The authors have prepared this report in accordance with the usual care and thoroughness of the Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research (CFFR), for use by the Department of Parks and Wildlife and only those third parties who have been authorised in writing by the CFFR to rely on the report. It is based on generally accepted practices and standards at the time it was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this report. It is prepared in accordance with the scope of work and for the purpose required by the Department of Parks and Wildlife. The methodology adopted and sources of information used by the authors are outlined in this report. The authors have made no independent verification of this information beyond the agreed scope of works, and they assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies or omissions. No indications were found during our investigations that information contained in this report as provided to the authors was false. This report was prepared during May-June 2015 and is based on the information reviewed at the time of preparation. The authors disclaim any responsibility for changes that may have occurred after this time. This report should be read in full.
    [Show full text]